AIMSweb Growth Table Reading-Curriculum Based Measurement Multi-Year Aggregate 2006-2007 School Year



Similar documents
Progress Monitoring Tools Chart Updated: December 2012

AIMSweb Default Cut Scores Explained

Progress Monitoring and RTI System

DUAL DISCREPANCY MODEL ASSESSMENT SCORES:

Phonics and Word Work

How To Pass A Test

Test of Early Numeracy. Kindergarten Benchmark Assessments. Benchmark Period 3 Notes and Observations: Given To: School: Fall Date Scored By

Fulda Independent School District 505

APPENDIX B CHECKLISTS

Using CBM to Progress Monitor English Language Learners

ISBN Item Format Price

Special Education Leads: Quality IEP Goals and Progress Monitoring Benefits Everyone

Review of K-12 Literacy and Math Progress Monitoring Tools

Selecting Research Based Instructional Programs

Create stories, songs, plays, and rhymes in play activities. Act out familiar stories, songs, rhymes, plays in play activities

DRA2 Word Analysis. correlated to. Virginia Learning Standards Grade 1

2e. Initial sounds isolate and pronounce in CVC (/c/ in cat) Onsets and rhymes in single

St. Petersburg College. RED 4335/Reading in the Content Area. Florida Reading Endorsement Competencies 1 & 2. Reading Alignment Matrix

Interpreting areading Scaled Scores for Instruction

District 2854 Ada-Borup Public Schools. Reading Well By Third Grade Plan. For. Ada-Borup Public Schools. Drafted April 2012

The Response to Intervention of English Language Learners At- Risk for Reading Problems

Common Core State Standards English Language Arts. IEP Goals and Objectives Guidance: Basic Format

Right into Reading. Program Overview Intervention Appropriate K 3+ A Phonics-Based Reading and Comprehension Program

Scientifically Based Reading Programs: What are they and how do I know?

Instructional Design: Objectives, Curriculum and Lesson Plans for Reading Sylvia Linan-Thompson, The University of Texas at Austin Haitham Taha,

Oral Diagnosis: The Physical Exam

7.0 Overview of Reports

Middle School Special Education Progress Monitoring and Goal- Setting Procedures. Section 2: Reading {Reading- Curriculum Based Measurement (R- CBM)}

Reading Competencies

Unit 2 Title: Word Work Grade Level: 1 st Grade Timeframe: 6 Weeks

Test Blueprint. Grade 3 Reading English Standards of Learning

Scholastic ReadingLine Aligns to Early Reading First Criteria and Required Activities

PA Academic Standards Mathematical Reasoning and Connections 2.5. Mathematical Problem Solving and Communication

Master of Science in Education Major in Early Childhood Literacy Online Graduate Education for Today s Teacher

Howard Community College Fall Courses for Educators

Comparison of Progress Monitoring with Computer Adaptive Tests and Curriculum Based Measures

Areas of Processing Deficit and Their Link to Areas of Academic Achievement

Teaching Reading Essentials:

INTEGRATING THE COMMON CORE STANDARDS INTO INTERACTIVE, ONLINE EARLY LITERACY PROGRAMS

First Grade Core Knowledge Addendum

Kindergarten Common Core State Standards: English Language Arts

Overview: Part 1 Adam Scheller, Ph.D. Senior Educational Consultant

Standards for Special Education Teachers

AIMSweb Quick Tip Handbook

Reading Specialist (151)

INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTIVITY WITH CELF 4 SOFTWARE! SAMPLE REPORTS. To order, call , or visit our Web site at

Scientifically Based Reading Programs. Marcia L. Kosanovich, Ph.D. Florida Center for Reading Research SLP Academy Fall, 2005

READING SPECIALIST STANDARDS

SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY

Student Progress Monitoring in Mathematics Pamela M. Stecker, PhD

Matrix Showing Match between NCATE Curriculum Guidelines for Early Childhood Education and CEOE Competencies. CEOE Subarea Competency III III

Rules for Excuses from Compulsory Attendance for Home Education in Ohio Revised Code (enacted in 1989):

SAMPLE EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION

The Early Grade Reading Assessment: Assessing children s acquisition of basic literacy skills in developing countries

DIBELS Next Benchmark Goals and Composite Score Dynamic Measurement Group, Inc. / August 19, 2016

mclass: Reading 3D Reminders

Comprehensive Reading Assessment Grades K-1

Dyslexia Certificate Program Level 1 Winter/Spring 2016

Foundation Skills. Presenters Demmi Paris IBSA Industry Manager - Foundation skills Anita Roberts Foundation skills consultant.

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION

Teaching Young Children How to Read: Phonics vs. Whole Language. Introduction and Background

Learning Disabilities: The S.A.D. Truth

Students with Reading Problems Their Characteristics and Needs

Practical, Research-Based Techniques for Teaching Students with Intellectual Disabilities to Read

Unit 1 Title: Word Work Grade Level: 1 st Grade Timeframe: 6 Weeks

A Parents Guide to Understanding. Reading

Setting Individual RTI Academic Performance Goals for the Off-Level Student Using Research Norms

OPELIKA CITY SCHOOLS

Interpretive Report of WISC-IV and WIAT-II Testing - (United Kingdom)

Opportunity Document for STEP Literacy Assessment

Charleston Southern University Graduate School of Education

COMPUTER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Using CBM for Progress Monitoring. Lynn S. Fuchs and Douglas Fuchs

C Reading Sufficiency Act - Programs of Reading Instruction

Understanding Types of Assessment Within an RTI Framework

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt StoryTown Grade 1. correlated to the. Common Core State Standards Initiative English Language Arts (2010) Grade 1

Reading/Fluency Standards Based Annual Goals

Bilingual Kindergarten Language Arts Report Card Rubric - Third Six Weeks

Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure

Psychology of Learning to Read

Reading Specialist Certification

Writing Instructionally Appropriate IEPs

Categories of Exceptionality and Definitions

Reading Readiness Online

iboard Phonics Curriculum Guidance

Patterns of Strengths and Weaknesses Standards and Procedures. for. Identification of Students with Suspected Specific Learning Disabilities

Strand: Reading Literature Topics Standard I can statements Vocabulary Key Ideas and Details

Minnesota K-12 Academic Standards in Language Arts Curriculum and Assessment Alignment Form Rewards Intermediate Grades 4-6

Math-Curriculum Based Measurement

CCSS English/Language Arts Standards Reading: Foundational Skills Kindergarten

DR. PAT MOSSMAN Tutoring

Technical Report. Overview. Revisions in this Edition. Four-Level Assessment Process

A SAMPLE INDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAM (IEP)

Transcription:

Reading-Curriculum Based Measurement Grade Percentile Num WRC Num WRC Num WRC ROI 9 53 8 9.6 75 23 49 82.6 5 9 24 53.2 25 236 3 8656 3 89495 29.7 7 6.4 Mean 9 35 59 26 32 37 9 5 3 45. 75 8 6. 5 55 79 94. 2 25 8328 28 73547 53 84689 69. 4 25 42.8 Mean 57 79 95 36 39 4 3 4 9 33 5 64.9 75 5 27 4 5 78 98 2.9 25 75327 5 69394 69 8557 84.9 3 42 53.6 Mean 8 97 4 9 5 69 84.9 75 25 4 56.9 5 4 27.8 25 57382 73 58592 89 59844.8 48 62 72.7 Mean 5 28 4 42 42 43 44

5 6 7 8 9 7 84 98.8 75 44 58 72.8 5 2 28 42.8 25 5483 86 56467 98 578.7 59 72 82.6 Mean 4 28 4 44 9 85 98 22.8 75 6 7 84.7 5 32 45 56.7 25 3267 2 337 4 34552 27.7 7 83 95.7 Mean 3 42 54 44 9 87 96 9.6 75 63 7 84.6 5 35 43 56.6 25 2276 7 236 5 23928 26.5 84 89 98.4 Mean 35 42 54 42 9 86 92.4 75 66 7 8.4 5 42 48 57.4 25 8885 3 97 9 9862 29.4 8 87 98.5 Mean 38 43 53 4 42 42 Num = Number of Students WRC = Words Read Correct ROI = Rate Of Improvement per week 44 45 43 46 46 44

Reading-Spanish Curriculum Based Measurement Grade Percentile Num WRC Num WRC Num WRC ROI 9 48 66 75 32 52. 5 9 38. 25 735 9 692 2.7 2 8.3 Mean 23 27 23 9 72 88.8 75 53 7 85.9 5 38 55 7.9 2 25 77 22 65 38 532 5.8 8 3.6 Mean 39 55 68 25 26 3 3 4 9 9 8 8.8 75 75 9 98.6 5 58 72 8.6 25 787 4 778 53 753 62.6 25 36 48.6 Mean 59 7 2 27 28 368 9 5 22 37.9 75 87 3.7 5 67 8 93.7 25 36 49 38 56 385 68.5 29 34 5.6 Mean 68 78 9 3 33 34

5 6 7 8 9 5 25 45.8 75 96 3 24.8 5 77 86.7 25 89 58 299 64 344 76.5 37 4 56.5 Mean 76 83 3 9 35 48 33 -. 75 3 26.2 5 84 98 95.3 25 59 55 73 73 64.3 27 43 4.4 Mean 84 98 9 4 9 75 5 25 Mean 33 4 36 39 9 69 75 49 5 24 25 358 9 63 Mean 8 43 Num = Number of Students WRC = Words Read Correct ROI = Rate Of Improvement per week

MAZE Comprehension Grade Percentile Num RC Num RC Num RC ROI 9 4 9.3 75 4 8 3.3 5 3 7.2 25 245 4383 4939 3. Mean 4 6 9 6 2 3 4 9 2 2 24.3 75 8 6 8.3 5 4 3.3 25 97 2 2 6 56 8.2 3 4. Mean 6 5 7 9 2 25 27.2 75 6 9 2. 5 4 5. 25 4537 7 5675 9 5423. 3 6 7. Mean 3 5 7 9 2 3 33.3 75 7 24 26.3 5 2 8 9.2 25 564 8 75 2 7536 3. 4 7 9. Mean 3 9 9 2 4

9 27 32 36.3 75 2 26 3.3 5 6 7 8 5 6 23.2 25 598 628 4 75 7.2 6 2.2 Mean 6 2 24 9 4 9 29 36 37.3 75 23 3 3.2 5 7 22 22. 25 88 2697 5 34 6. 8. Mean 8 23 23 9 9 32 33 39.2 75 26 27 3. 5 9 24. 25 937 4 56 5 773 7. 2. Mean 2 2 25 9 33 29 37. 75 26 23 29. 5 8 23. 25 74 5 993 4 8986 7. 3. Mean 2 9 24 9 9 Num = Number of Students RC = Responses Correct ROI = Rate Of Improvement 9

Initial Sounds Fluency Grade Percentile Num ISC Num ISC Num ISC ROI 9 22 4 48.7 75 25 3 33.5 5 8 2.4 K 25 5586 4 57799 2 248 2.2 6 3. Mean 22 24 9 6 7 Num = Number of Students ISC = Initial Sounds Correct ROI = Rate Of Improvement AIMSweb Growth Table Letter Naming Fluency Grade Percentile Num LNC Num LNC Num LNC ROI 9 37 56 67.8 75 25 45 55.8 5 34 44.9 K 25 85 2 86 9 84828 3.8 8 9.5 Mean 5 33 43 5 8 8 9 63 74 82.5 75 53 63 7.5 5 4 52 57.4 25 77585 29 547 38 3286 43.4 8 9 25.2 Mean 4 49 55 8 2 23 Num = Number of Students LNC = Letter Names Correct ROI = Rate Of Improvement

Letter Sound Fluency Grade Percentile Num LSC Num LSC Num LSC ROI 9 2 4 53.9 75 3 43.9 5 4 8 3.8 K 25 2336 3378 8 35424 9.5 2.3 Mean 7 32 5 7 9 46 58 6.4 75 36 48 5.4 5 26 38 4.4 25 2386 5 7699 27 5827 3.4 7 7.4 Mean 26 38 4 5 6 7 Num = Number of Students LSC = Letter Sounds Correct ROI = Rate Of Improvement

Phoneme Segmentation Fluency Grade Percentile Num PC Num PC Num PC ROI 9 42 46 62.6 75 29 36 53.7 5 9 4.8 K 25 2975 79227 7 839 24.7 8.2 Mean 6 22 38 7 8 9 55 65 69.4 75 46 57 6.4 5 35 47 5.4 25 7648 8 7888 36 6239 4.6 6 22 3.7 Mean 33 46 5 8 29 2 2 9 7. 75 56. 5 4. 25 62 26. 3. Mean 4 Num = Number of Students PC = Phonemes Correct ROI = Rate Of Improvement

Nonsense Word Fluency Grade Percentile Num SC Num SC Num SC ROI 9 4 4 57.2 75 28 42.2 5 6 29.8 K 25 283 63337 5 74478 7.5 7.2 Mean 3 9 32 9 8 23 9 54 85 5.7 75 39 62 82.2 5 25 46 58.9 25 7679 4 7679 33 68727 4.8 4 22 29.7 Mean 29 5 65 23 28 33 2 9 4 96 -. 75 74 7 72 -. 5 5 48 5. 25 44865 35 366 28 2485 32 -. 22 2 -.3 Mean 57 5 54 32 36 35 Num = Number of Students SC = Sounds Correct ROI = Rate Of Improvement

Spelling - Curriculum Based Measurement Grade Percentile Num CLS Num CLS Num CLS ROI 9 4 5 56.4 75 35 46 5.4 5 26 4 44.5 25 3 4 2284 33 237 36.6 3 7.5 Mean 25 37 4 4 3 4 9 64 66 68. 75 59 62 65.2 5 5 55 6.3 2 25 33 39 33 45 3329 54.4 28 33 42.4 Mean 47 52 57 5 5 3 3 4 9 4 8.2 75 96 2 8.3 5 83 9.5 25 29 63 29 74 2873 85.6 43 5 57.4 Mean 77 84 95 25 9 5 24 22.2 75 7 8 6.3 5 93 7 6.4 25 2634 73 34 87 2757 88.4 5 6 6.3 Mean 87 98 98 27 25 27 69 33

9 36 33 34 -. 75 3 27 29 5 6 7 8 5 7 5 9. 25 22 92 2368 94 265 98.2 65 62 63 -. Mean 8 6 8 28 9 42 4 47. 75 35 32 4. 5 8 28.2 25 956 94 24 263.4 66 78 83.4 Mean 2 3 3 9 37 45 43.2 75 27 34 35.2 5 8 6 7.3 25 83 83 84 95 2 94.3 54 73 79.6 Mean 2 2 3 46 9 45 42 42 -. 75 38 34 33 -. 5 24 8 4 -.3 25 939 88 7 97 8 94.2 7 73.8 Mean 4 48 3 29 Num = Number of Students CLS = Correct Letter Sequences ROI = Rate Of Improvement 29 26 28 3 28 27

Oral Counting Grade Percentile Num COC Num COC Num COC ROI 9 67 84 97.8 75 5 7 84.9 5 37 57 7.9 K 25 9424 8 39 85 55. 24 39.8 Mean 37 55 68 23 23 2 9 92.2 75 8 94.6 5 69 8 9.6 25 4245 55 348 69 3777 76.6 39 58 64.7 Mean 67 8 86 8 7 Num = Number of Students COC = Correct Oral Counts ROI = Rate Of Improvement

Number Identification Grade Percentile Num CNI Num CNI Num CNI ROI K 9 56 56 56 75 47 56 56.3 5 3 48 55.7 25 9753 3 8 34 567 44.9 2 32.8 Mean 3 43 49 9 9 62 78 8.5 75 54 68 72.5 5 43 57 62.5 25 9794 28 678 46 6664 5.6 5 32 38.6 Mean 4 56 6 8 7 6 Num = Number of Students CNI = Correct Number Identifications ROI = Rate Of Improvement 5 2

Quantity Discrimination Grade Percentile Num CQD Num CQD Num CQD ROI 9 26 28 28. 75 8 27 28.3 5 9 27.5 K 25 4272 3 673 7252 9.4 5 9.3 Mean 8 23 9 9 8 9 34 4 4.2 75 28 36 4.3 5 22 3 34.3 25 4878 4 3955 24 45 27.4 4 6.4 Mean 2 29 32 9 Num = Number of Students CQD = Correct Quantity Discriminations ROI = Rate Of Improvement

Missing Number Grade Percentile Num CMN Num CMN Num CMN ROI 9 4 2.2 75 6 9.3 5 4 5.3 K 25 3478 599 6 5866.3 2 5. Mean 6 4 6 7 6 9 25 27.2 75 6 2 23.2 5 2 7 9.2 25 932 7 935 3 669 4.2 2 9.2 Mean 2 7 9 7 8 7 Num = Number of Students CMN = Correct Missing Number ROI = Rate Of Improvement

Written Expression - Correct Writing Sequences Grade Percentile Num CWS Num CWS Num CWS ROI 9 5 2.3 75 5 9 4.3 5 2 4 9.2 25 352 857 7 4. 2. Mean 4 6 5 6 8 9 9 29 38.5 75 2 28.4 5 6 2 9.4 2 25 2425 2 263 6 256.3 3. Mean 8 5 8 3 3 3 4 9 35 43 5.4 75 26 34 39.4 5 6 24 28.3 25 2354 7 2528 4 2457 8.3 5 8.2 Mean 7 24 29 3 9 47 55 6.4 75 37 45 5.4 5 24 33 38.4 25 64 4 242 22 2327 28.4 6 2 7.3 Mean 26 33 39 6 5 6 7

9 58 63 72.4 75 45 5 6.4 5 6 7 8 5 33 4 48.4 25 988 2 244 28 96 35.4 4 24.4 Mean 34 39 48 8 9 63 7 76.4 75 52 59 64.3 5 4 47 52.3 25 4 29 685 35 668 39.3 25 28.2 Mean 4 47 52 7 9 75 74 84.3 75 62 6 7.2 5 48 48 55.2 25 798 34 737 35 787 37. 2 25 Mean 49 49 57 27 9 79 77 85.2 75 67 67 74.2 5 54 53 62.2 25 884 4 749 4 68 47.2 29 28 33. Mean 54 53 6 9 Num = Number of Students CWS = Correct Writing Sequences ROI = Rate Of Improvement 27 9 8 59

Written Expression - Total Words Written Grade Percentile Num TWW Num TWW Num TWW ROI 9 4 26 33.5 75 9 9 26.5 5 5 3 9.4 25 286 2 6 7 487 3.3 4 9.2 Mean 6 4 6 9 9 35 38 5.4 75 25 29 39.4 5 6 27.3 2 25 583 65 3 49.3 5 8 2.2 Mean 8 23 3 2 6 6 3 4 9 48 53 6.3 75 37 44 47.3 5 26 34 35.3 25 563 8 64 23 626 22. 9 5 3. Mean 28 34 36 4 9 56 62 65.3 75 43 5 53.3 5 3 4 4.3 25 67 82 3 7 29.5 2.6 Mean 29 4 4 5 7 8 8

9 62 68 65. 75 5 57 56. 5 6 7 8 5 37 46 45.2 25 843 23 9 36 672 35.3 27 26.7 Mean 36 47 46 22 9 6 66 74.4 75 47 57 64.5 5 33 48 53.6 25 467 473 38 642 4. 3 29.8 Mean 29 48 52 23 9 7 7 83.3 75 6 62 69.2 5 5 5 59.3 25 246 34 443 4 366 45.3 8 29 33.4 Mean 47 5 58 9 83 74 8 -. 75 72 65 7 5 59 55 58 25 94 45 397 44 29 45 34 34 35 Mean 58 54 58 6 8 Num = Number of Students TWW = Total Words Written ROI = Rate Of Improvement 6 5 8 8 9

Mathematics Computation Grade Percentile Num CD Num CD Num CD ROI 9 3 22 29.4 75 8 6.3 5 5 4.3 25 4675 2 9635 7 752.2 4 6.2 Mean 6 2 6 8 9 36 4.6 75 4 3 3.4 5 23 22.3 2 25 8787 8 9879 6 47 6.2 5. Mean 2 23 24 8 3 3 4 9 26 38 46.6 75 2 3 37.4 5 6 25 29.4 25 7886 2 8362 8 8735 2.3 3 5. Mean 7 26 3 8 9 62 74 86.7 75 46 59 7.7 5 35 44 53.5 25 8293 24 8735 32 8999 39.4 6 22 28.3 Mean 37 47 56 8 2 2 3 24

9 5 6 73.6 75 4 48 6.6 5 6 7 8 5 3 38 49.5 25 6944 23 763 28 823 36.4 5 8 25.3 Mean 32 39 49 5 9 53 69 65.3 75 39 5 47.2 5 27 37 33.2 25 2692 3654 27 338 25. 4 2 2.2 Mean 32 42 39 2 9 48 7 6.3 75 35 53 46.3 5 26 4 35.3 25 892 9 774 29 794 27.2 4 2 2.2 Mean 29 43 38 6 9 56 68 64.2 75 4 55 47.2 5 3 4 35. 25 83 22 72 28 6 27. 5 2 22.2 Mean 32 43 39 6 8 Num = Number of Students CD = Correct Digits ROI = Rate Of Improvement 7 23 23 5

MIDE Letter Naming Fluency Grade Percentile Num LNC Num LNC Num LNC ROI 9 5 42 48.9 75 7 33 4.9 5 2 8 33.9 K 25 448 373 6 32.6 3 9.3 Mean 5 2 3 7 6 5 9 4 75 29 5 25 255 8 2 Mean 22 23 Num = Number of Students LNC = Letter Names Correct ROI = Rate Of Improvement

MIDE Letter Sound Fluency Grade Percentile Num LSC Num LSC Num LSC ROI 9 3 46.9 75 9 33.8 5 9 22.7 K 25 393 4 233 4.6 5.2 Mean 3 24 2 5 9 35 75 2 5 3 25 236 5 3 Mean 6 2 Num = Number of Students LSC = Letter Sounds Correct ROI = Rate Of Improvement

MIDE Syllable Reading Fluency Grade Percentile Num LSC Num LSC Num LSC ROI 9 36 64.6 75 6 46.7 5 9 23.8 K 25 358 299.6 3.2 Mean 3 3 5 28 9 69 7 2.7 75 44 87 2.4 5 25 56.7 25 346 9 37 36.5 2.2 Mean 3 63 26 37 Num = Number of Students LSC = Letter Sounds Correct ROI = Rate Of Improvement

MIDE Syllable Segmentation Fluency Grade Percentile Num SSC Num SSC Num SSC ROI 9 39 56 63.7 75 34 47 56.6 5 7 4 47.8 K 25 83 372 29 297 37. 2 3.8 Mean 9 38 47 6 7 5 9 56 72.9 75 47 59.7 5 38 5.7 25 35 28 369 43.8 8 36.6 Mean 37 53 9 2 Num = Number of Students SSC = Syllable Segments Correct ROI = Rate Of Improvement

MIDE Spelling Grade Percentile Num CLS Num CLS Num CLS ROI 9 33 36.2 75 4 36.2 5 32.4 K 25 46 243 6.9 4.2 Mean 26 2 2 9 42 78 2. 75 3 73 2.3 5 57 2. 25 295 7 282 38.7 24.3 Mean 2 54 7 22 Num = Number of Students CLS = Correct Letter Sequences ROI = Rate Of Improvement