Middle Years Assessment of Key Competencies in Mathematics, Reading Comprehension, Expository Writing, and Student Engagement



Similar documents
[division name] Grades 7 and 8 Report Card. [school name]

Assessment, Recording and Reporting Policy

Assessment, Recording and Reporting Policy

Japanese International School. Assessment Recording and Reporting Policy

Requirements for Special Education in Accredited-Funded Private Schools

ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION, AND COMMUNICATION OF STUDENT LEARNING POLICY

Mark Rutherford School Assessment Policy (Reviewed by Governors Curriculum sub committee January 2014)

Bring Your Own Device Guide

R e p o r t i n g S t u d e n t L e a r n i n g. Guidelines for Effective Teacher-Parent-Student Communication

Suggested Guidelines for the Development and Peer Review of Online Distance Learning Courses

Additional Qualification Course Guideline. Primary Education Specialist

AfL with APP: developing collaborative schoolbased. Guidance for senior leaders

Rygaards International Secondary School Assessment, Recording and Reporting Policy

International Baccalaureate Diploma Assessment Policy Holy Heart of Mary High School

ONE YEAR COURSES FASHION IMAGE & STYLING INTENSIVE

SUPPORTING ASSESSMENT IN SCHOOLS - 1

EXAMPLE FIELD EXPERIENCE PLANNING TEMPLATE CCSU MAT Program

Policy statement: Assessment, recording and reporting achievement.

ONTARIO LEADERSHIP STRATEGY. Principal/ Vice-Principal Performance Appraisal

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES The roles and responsibilities expected of teachers at each classification level are specified in the Victorian Government

WORKING TOGETHER. A Handbook for Parents of Children with Special Needs in School Manitoba Education, Citizenship and Youth

DRAFT ACTION PLAN FOR BETTER LOWER SECONDARY EDUCATION IN NORWAY

Principal Performance Review

Sample Completed Summative Report Form for a Secondary Teacher 1*

cbe.ab.ca reporting Considerations for students with Alberta Education Special Education Coding K-9

Table of Contents. Different licences for different vehicles 1. Authorized Instruction: Learning to drive other types of vehicles 6

Proposed Policy for the Recognition of External Language Credentials

Assessment of, for and as

Guidance for School Improvement Partners. Supporting and challenging improvement in AfL with APP

Assessment for Learning and Pupils with Special Educational Needs

Nova Scotia Leadership Academy Instructional Leadership Program Information

Ministry of Education. Standards for School Boards Special Education Plans

Chapter 3 - Alternative Assessments

ICT-based communication and collaboration for learning policy

WHAT WORKS IN INNOVATION AND EDUCATION IMPROVING TEACHING AND LEARNING FOR ADULTS WITH BASIC SKILL NEEDS THROUGH FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT STUDY OUTLINE

The John Fisher School. Assessment, Recording and Reporting Policy

A R e s o u r c e G u i d e

Technology Plan Cover Sheet

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN MANITOBA EDUCATION, CITIZENSHIP AND YOUTH (MANITOBA, CANADA) AND

Ryburn Valley High School

Program Planning and Assessment

Numeracy across learning Principles and practice

/

State of Financial Education In Canada

Self Assessment Tool for Principals and Vice-Principals

LITERACY. Paying Attention to. Six Foundational Principles for Improvement in Literacy, K 12

IMMIGRATION Canada. Work permit. Kingston Visa Office Instructions. Table of contents IMM 5912 E ( )

Induction Elements Manual

The Alberta Student Assessment Study Executive Summary

Information for Individuals Adult Abuse Registry Check (Self Check-Mail) Checklist

Aboriginal Medical Student Financial Assistance Program (AMSFAP)

Ontario Statistical Neighbours

What is the PYP Perspective on Assessment?

HAYDON BRIDGE HIGH SCHOOL ASSESSMENT, RECORDING & REPORTING POLICY

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Occupational Therapists

After Degree Year 2 Information for Early, Early/Middle, and Middle Years Students for September, 2015

Assessment for Curriculum for Excellence. Strategic Vision Key Principles

North Carolina TEACHER. evaluation process. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction

PBS TeacherLine Course Syllabus

St. Joseph s College Education Department Handbook for Student Teachers Cooperating Teachers College Supervisors

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Special Education, Specialist

Frequently Asked Questions

Statutory assessment arrangements for the Foundation Phase and end of Key Stages 2 and 3

Hurworth School Assessment, Recording and Reporting Policy

Reporting Student Progress: Policy and Practice

Inspectorate Guidelines for Schools P R O M O T I N G T H E Q U A L I T Y O F L E A R N I N G

ELICOS NATIONAL STANDARDS

Illinois State Board of Education

Project Management System Table of Contents

Modern Foreign Languages (MFL)

To provide the public with information on roles and responsibilities in the area of special education

After Degree Year 2 Information for Senior Years Stream Students for September, 2016

The French Language Catholic School Curriculum

Table of Contents. What is STEP?... 3 The Purpose of STEP... 3 Initial Assessment Ongoing Assessment Background... 4

Grade 12 Consumer Mathematics Standards Test. Written Test Student Booklet

Basic Assessment Concepts for Teachers and School Administrators.

A Guide to Curriculum Development: Purposes, Practices, Procedures

Principal Practice Observation Tool

Inspectorate Guidelines for Schools P R O M O T I N G T H E Q U A L I T Y O F L E A R N I N G

MS Communication Arts Goals Building and District Update 2/26/2009

Possible examples of how the Framework For Teaching could apply to Instructional Coaches

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists Definition of an Effective School Psychologist

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Intermediate Division Business Studies Information and Communication Technology

Departmental Directive on the Management of Information in the Student Record and Other Records Pertaining to Students

Learning Goals & Success Criteria

Healthy Schools Strategy

CALIFORNIA S TEACHING PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS (TPE)

Evaluating teaching. 6.1 What is teacher evaluation and why is it important?

Policy, Guidelines, and Procedures for Alternative Education Programs

Secondary Education in Canada: A Student Transfer Guide Québec

Prettygate Junior School. Assessment, Recording and Reporting Policy. Date: Summer 2015 Review: Summer 2018

Committee On Public Secondary Schools. Standards for Accreditation

Policy Document Planning, Assessment, Recording and Reporting September 2010

Illinois State Board of Education

owing Community THROUGH ARTS EDUCATION

The Case of Singapore Rethinking Curriculum for the 21 st Century

How To Improve The Curriculum At Minnetonka School District

Evidence of Learning in the 21 st Century Classroom Classroom Observation Rubric To Guide Leadership for Learning by Instructional Leaders TASK

Establishing your identity

Developing Higher Level Thinking

Transcription:

Middle Years Assessment of Key Competencies in Mathematics, Reading Comprehension, Expository Writing, and Student Engagement

M i d d L E Y E A R s A s s E s s M E n t o f K E Y C o M p E t E n C i E s i n M A t h E M A t i C s, R E A d i n g C o M p R E h E n s i o n, E x p o s i t o R Y W R i t i n g, A n d s t u d E n t E n g A g E M E n t Revised May 2015 Manitoba Education and Advanced Learning

Manitoba Education and Advanced Learning Cataloguing in Publication Data Middle years assessment of key competencies in mathematics, reading comprehension, expository writing, and student engagement [electronic resource] Includes bibliographical references. ISBN: 978-0-7711-5779-0 1. Educational tests and measurements Manitoba. 2. Middle school students Manitoba Rating of. 3. Mathematical ability Testing. 4. Reading comprehension Ability testing. 5. Language arts Manitoba Ability testing. 6. English language Composition and exercises Ability testing. 7. Motivation in education Manitoba. 8. Academic achievement Manitoba. I. Manitoba. Manitoba Education and Advanced Learning. 371.26097127 Copyright @ 2015, the Government of Manitoba, represented by the Minister of Education and Advanced Learning. Manitoba Education and Advanced Learning School Programs Division Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Every effort has been made to acknowledge original sources and to comply with copyright law. If cases are identified where this has not been done, please notify Manitoba Education and Advanced Learning. Errors or omissions will be corrected in a future edition. Sincere thanks to the authors, artists, and publishers who allowed their original material to be used. Schools are encouraged to share this document with parents, guardians, and communities, as appropriate. Print copies of this document can be purchased from the Manitoba Text Book Bureau (stock number 80532). Order online at <www.mtbb.mb.ca>. This document is available on the Manitoba Education and Advanced Learning website at: <www.edu.gov.mb.ca/k12/assess/docs/my_policy/index.html>. Websites are subject to change without notice. This document is an update of the 2010 edition. Ce document est disponible en français au : <www.edu.gov.mb.ca/m12/eval/eval_7_8.html>. Available in alternate formats upon request.

C o n t E n t s Rationale 1 Purpose 2 Implementation 3 Assessing Students 5 Reporting Results 7 References 8 C o n t e n t s iii

R A t i o n A L E Assessment of student performance is vital to guide the teaching-learning process. Research shows that both the quality and level of academic achievement and student engagement can be increased through formative assessment assessment for and as learning (Manitoba Education, Citizenship and Youth). In classrooms where formative assessment refers to frequent, interactive assessments of student progress and understanding to identify learning needs and adjust teaching appropriately, the gains in student achievement are quite considerable (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]; Black and Wiliam; Allal and Lopez; Wiggins). This assessment for learning done by the teacher fosters an internal assessment as learning on the part of the student. To become independent learners, students need to participate in the assessment process. From the start, students need to construct for themselves an idea of what is to be learned. The teacher needs to explain the learning outcomes in terms that students understand, and to have them participate in n n n setting criteria that define success giving and obtaining feedback planning the next steps to reach the learning outcomes Depending on student needs, the teacher shows students how to carefully review and refine their work. Gradually, students learn to assess themselves and their peers fairly and realistically, being neither too harsh, nor too lax about the quality of the work. Going beyond self-assessment, students must make the necessary adjustments to their work, and use the feedback gained from self-assessment, and from their peers and teacher. Students must be actively engaged in the teaching-learning process. There is also a need to summarize information on the achievement of students summative assessment or assessment of learning at certain points in time, to inform students, teachers, parents, and the broader educational community. This type of information can be used to adjust the teaching-learning process and to support the ongoing dialogue with parents. An OECD study reports that parents who were given the opportunity to become familiar with alternate forms of reporting of their children s progress, such as through more extensive use of narratives and rubrics, found this helpful and informative, and gave them more guidance in how they might help their children with school work. Summative information also provides feedback to the school or system so that appropriate supports for further learning are provided and serves to communicate achievement to stakeholders. M i d d l e Y e a r s A s s e s s m e n t 1

p u R p o s E The primary purpose of the policy is to enhance student learning and engagement through classroom-based assessment processes that build student awareness and confidence in learning. Formative assessment practices (assessment for and as learning) have great potential to improve learning. These practices engage students in setting learning goals and the criteria for success and involve them in self-assessment and communicating about their progress. The second purpose is to gather summative information about the levels of achievement in key areas that Middle Years students have attained by the end of January. These key areas address reading, writing, and number skills, as well as student engagement in their learning. This Middle Years Assessment complements the Grades 3 and 4 Assessment and the Grade 12 provincial tests in providing a provincial picture of student achievement. Applied as an assessment of learning, there are three types of audience for the achievement information. The first is parents through vehicles such as school or division reports to the community. The second is the school-based learning team consisting of teachers and administrators as well as divisional leaders and trustees. The third is the larger educational and stakeholder communities including the department, the public, and researchers. These groups use the information at aggregate levels to examine trends, to support research, and to make decisions about the provision of resources to support student learning. 2 M i d d l e Y e a r s A s s e s s m e n t

i M p L E M E n t A t i o n This policy applies to all students in Grade 7 and Grade 8 in provincially funded schools. Non-funded and First Nations schools are invited to participate. The assessment addresses competencies in mathematics, reading, and writing, as well as engagement with learning as summarized in the following tables by grade and school program. English Program Key Competency Mid-grade 7 Mid-grade 8 number sense 4 Application of number skills 4 student Engagement 4 Reading Comprehension 4 Writing of Expository texts 4 Français Program Key Competency Mid-grade 7 Mid-grade 8 sens des nombres 4 habiletés mathématiques 4 Engagement de l élève 4 Compréhension en Lecture 4 Écriture de textes informatifs 4 Reading Comprehension (in English) Writing of Expository texts (in English) optional optional M i d d l e Y e a r s A s s e s s m e n t 3

French Immersion Program Key Competency Mid-grade 7 Mid-grade 8 sens des nombres 4 habiletés mathématiques 4 Engagement de l élève 4 Compréhension en Lecture 4 Écriture de textes informatifs 4 Reading Comprehension (in English) 4 Writing of Expository texts (in English) 4 School divisions and schools implement the Middle Years Assessment policy. Teachers gather assessment information on their students using teacher-selected strategies to assess competencies according to criteria (competencies, indicators, performance levels, exemplars) provided by the department in a separate document available at <www.edu.gov.mb.ca/k12/assess/myreporting.html>. 4 M i d d l e Y e a r s A s s e s s m e n t

A s s E s s i n g s t u d E n t s formative Assessment Throughout the year, it is important to incorporate formative (assessment for and as learning) practices in the daily life of the classroom. Together, teachers and students use assessment to set goals and the criteria for success, to plan and adjust the teaching-learning process, to provide descriptive feedback, and to observe and communicate progress. To become independent learners, students need to be involved in the assessment process. This might begin with the teacher modelling strategies and providing specific descriptive feedback. The teacher might show students how to carefully review and refine their work as needed. Gradually, students learn to assess themselves and make the necessary adjustments to their work. As part of this Middle Years Assessment Policy, students will gauge their own performance relative to the same criteria used by teachers. This is intended to engage students in their own learning and lead to discussions among students, parents, and teachers regarding learning and progress. summative Assessment In the last two weeks of January, 1 teachers prepare student reports showing each student s level of attainment on each of the identified key competencies. The assessment is not a test but is based on the teacher s observations and conversations with students during daily instruction and on evidence from work that is collected. This assessment is based on the most recent, stable evidence of student achievement gathered as part of the normal teaching-learning process, and is made relative to mid-year criteria provided by the department which are based on curricular, grade-level learning outcomes. The assessment of student performance for this policy is not restricted to language arts and mathematics teachers, and may include input from teacher teams, especially for student engagement. 1 french immersion schools with a late immersion program can assess grade 7 students in Mathématiques in the first two weeks of March. M i d d l e Y e a r s A s s e s s m e n t 5

In rare instances it will not be possible to assess some students and report results to parents or to the department as required by this policy due to exceptional circumstances. For example, the student might have arrived in the province in January with no performance information available. Such a student may be exempted from the reporting process provided the parents are informed, they give consent, and the school makes a request that includes the details of the circumstances to the department by the end of January. The format request letter must include n n n n n school name student name and MET number description of the exceptional circumstances statement that the parent approves of the exemption school contact person with title, telephone number, and signature The request may be mailed or sent by fax to English Program: Coordinator, Assessment Unit Instruction, Curriculum and Assessment Branch 71 1567 Dublin Avenue Winnipeg MB R3E 3J5 Fax: 204-948-2442 Français Program and French Immersion Program: Directeur, Direction des services de soutien en éducation Bureau de l éducation française Division 309 1181 Portage Avenue Winnipeg MB R3G 0T3 Fax: 204-948-3234 Once the exemption from reporting is granted by the department, no reporting to the parents is required. For reporting to the department, no further action is required. The exemption is indicated in the data, and no performance levels for any of the competencies are reported. For students who are not performing at any of the three levels presented in the reporting forms, please see the section entitled Reporting Results (on the following page) for further information. 6 M i d d l e Y e a r s A s s e s s m e n t

R E p o R t i n g R E s u L t s Schools report each student s performance to parents, in a timely manner, and to the department, no later than the end of February. The reporting of student achievement is to reflect student performance as of the last two weeks of January. Schools and school divisions are to include an analysis of their results in a report to the community, along with appropriate contextual background information. To facilitate data reporting, the department will provide summary reports of divisional and provincial results for all competencies, by school program, to school divisions. School-level data summaries are available from the web application used by schools to report to the department. Student performance reflects cumulative growth and achievement as a result of instruction over previous years. Therefore, it is appropriate to share the information with the teacher team in a school to foster collaborative efforts to improve student learning. Schools use the reporting forms provided by the department to communicate results to parents. These reports are to be signed by principals and copies are to be kept in students cumulative files. Performance levels are determined with the aid of examples in the parent reports and samples of student work provided in support documents available at <www.edu.gov.mb.ca/k12/assess/myreporting.html>. If a student s performance level is below the lowest level described in the reporting form for all competencies, this is normally because the student is not working towards gradelevel curricular outcomes as described in an individual education plan (IEP). In this case, it is not necessary to send a report home to parents providing that appropriate communication between home and school is ongoing. Where this applies for only some competencies, a report is sent home and no performance levels are indicated for those competencies. The comment section is used to explain the circumstances. For reporting data to the department via the Web, an option will be provided for each competency to indicate if the student is performing below the lowest performance level described on the parent report for the competency. Schools will report individual student results to the department no later than the end of February 1. Information about this reporting process will be sent to all schools near the beginning of each school year. Schools or school divisions wishing to incorporate reporting to parents for this policy into other reporting procedures rather than using the provincial reporting templates must first obtain authorization from the department. The department will use results data for publicly reporting at the provincial and program levels as well as addressing specific areas of interest and research. No departmental public reporting will permit the identification of a student, class, school, or school division. 1 french immersion schools with a late immersion program can report the grade 7 Mathématiques results to the department by the end of March. M i d d l e Y e a r s A s s e s s m e n t 7

R E f E R E n C E s Allal, Linda, and Lucie Mottier Lopez. Formative Assessment of Learning: A Review of Publications in French. Formative Assessment: Improving Learning in Secondary Classrooms. Paris, FR: OECD Publishing, 2005. 241 265. Black, Paul, and Dylan Wiliam. Changing Teaching through Formative Assessment: Research and Practice: The King s-medway-oxfordshire. Formative Assessment: Improving Learning in Secondary Classrooms. Paris, FR: OECD Publishing, 2005. 223-240. Manitoba Education, Citizenship and Youth. Rethinking Classroom Assessment with Purpose in Mind, Assessment for Learning, Assessment as Learning, Assessment of Learning. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Education, Citizenship and Youth, 2006. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Formative Assessment: Improving Learning in Secondary Classrooms. Paris, FR: OECD Publishing, 2005. Wiggins, Grant P. Educative Assessment Designing Assessments to Inform and Improve Student Performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass Inc., 1998. 8 M i d d l e Y e a r s A s s e s s m e n t

Printed in Canada Imprimé au Canada