Principal Performance Review
|
|
|
- Berniece Briggs
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Principal Performance Review: Principal Performance Review Principal Information Principal: School Year: School: Phone Number: Superintendent: District: Cluster: Network Leader: Status Interim Acting: Probationer: Tenured:
2 Principal Performance Review: PRINCIPAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW INTRODUCTION TO THE PRINCIPAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW The Principal Performance Review (PPR) offers you a critical opportunity to examine the progress your students are making and to identify the decisions and steps needed to help your school improve student outcomes. The PPR is designed as a core component of the DOE s accountability system. This annual review will result in a Final Rating for all principals based on performance in the following areas of responsibility: 1. Accomplishing the goals and objectives that you set for yourself at the beginning of the year 2. Your school s Progress Report results 3. Your school s most recent Quality Review score 4. Addressing the particular needs of English Language Learners and Special Education Adhering to legal requirements and other key DOE policies that apply to your school and that are addressed in the Compliance Review conducted each year by the DOE s Office of Compliance Services When setting your goals and objectives remember that the components of the Progress Report, the Quality Review, as well as other key data sources provide important information about areas of need and possible improvements in your school. We expect that you will consult the NYCDOE School Leadership Competencies when considering your strengths and development areas as a school leader. Your school s CEP can be especially useful in addressing programming, budgeting, and resource allocation. Using all of these supports, you are encouraged to focus particular attention on your school s needs to ensure that every child has access to daily rigorous instruction. By addressing the needs of these students will help your school show significant progress in student learning and outcomes. PRINCIPAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW THREE-STEP PROCESS 1. Goals and Objectives: A minimum of four and a maximum of five goals and objectives are due October 14, You will have an opportunity to revise the goals and objectives through November 30, Your superintendent will provide initial feed back to you by November 14 th. For updated guidance on setting goals and objectives, see the Principal Evaluations page under Leadership & Staff Development on the Principals Portal. 2. Mid-Year Principal Performance Review: On January 30, 2012, your mid-year summary (see Appendix D) is due to your superintendent. 3. Annual Principal Performance Review: On June 30, 2012, your final summary, which will be posted on the Principals Portal and shared in Principals Weekly this spring, is due to your superintendent. * Upon request, you may meet with your superintendent to address issues during any step of the process.
3 Principal Performance Review: Your Goals and Objectives Your goals and objectives are to be completed in consultation with your superintendent by October 14, If necessary, you will be able to revise the goals and objectives after issuance of the Progress Report, Quality Review, and/or annual PPR evaluation. Using the template in Appendix A, please describe a minimum of four and a maximum of five performance goals and objectives you have set for the coming year. These goals and objectives should focus on improving teacher effectiveness, student academic outcomes, or your school s learning environment. They must be agreed upon mutually with your community or high school superintendent. In addition, for the school year, at least two of your goals must align with the citywide instructional expectations. Please see the Principal Evaluations page under Leadership & Staff Development on the Principals Portal for additional guidance on setting goals and objectives and other supporting materials. In defining your goals and objectives, and selecting types of evidence you will use to demonstrate progress or completion of your objectives, consider your school s success across multiple measures in order to develop the most meaningful goals. These measures could include but are not limited to your school s results on the Progress Report; feedback from parents, teachers, and students on the School Survey; your school s most recent Quality Review report (3) your school s most recent CEP including the Language Allocation Policy (LAP) ; (4) your school s most recent NCLB outcomes; and (5) other available data. For each goal, please identify the measurable objective or target you have set for yourself, which reflects your best thinking about how to meet the demonstrated the needs of your school. In narrative form, please describe your plan for meeting each goal, including your strategy for staffing, scheduling, and funding to implement the action plan, as appropriate. You should also describe the objective evidence you will use to track progress throughout the year toward meeting each goal. (e.g., Periodic Assessment outcomes, number or frequency of teacher observations using a rubric of teacher practice, improvement of internal measures such as scores on common assessments or teacher made rubrics) In drafting your plan, please keep in mind the NYCDOE School Leadership Competencies. In particular, you should consider your strengths and development areas on the following five competencies that are critical to increasing student achievement and leading schools, and identify specific steps you can take to improve in these areas: a. Personal Leadership: Fosters a culture of excellence through personal leadership b. Data: Uses data to set high learning goals and increase student achievement c. Curriculum and Instruction: Leverages deep knowledge of curriculum, instruction, and assessment to improve student learning d. Staff and Community: Develops staff, appropriately shares leadership, and builds strong school communities e. Resources and Operations: Manages resources and operations to improve student learning In preparing your goals and objectives with your superintendent, you may invite your network leader and other relevant advisors to support you in this process. The support of network staff and other relevant advisors may include help with developing priorities, strategies and plans that enable you to meet the goals and objectives prepared. Networks may also offer training on developing effective goals and objectives. Goals and objectives are due to your superintendent on October 14, Mid-Year Principal Performance Review By January 30, 2012, you will submit a mid-year summary of your progress toward meeting the goals and objectives for the year. You can find a template for the mid-year PPR in Appendix D. During the mid-year PPR, your superintendent will review and provide feedback on your progress toward meeting all of the objectives in your PPR, as well as assess data for your school. The mid-year review is designed to provide you with an opportunity to assess the progress made for each PPR goal and to modify your goals, as necessary. You may invite a network representative to support you in the mid-year review process.
4 Principal Performance Review: Annual Principal Performance Review By June 30, 2012, you should complete the end-of-year summary template, which will be posted on the Principals Portal and shared in Principals Weekly this spring, providing an evidence-based narrative of the progress you have made toward meeting your goals and objectives for the year. The annual PPR will be completed immediately after issuance of the previous year s Progress Report results. Principals will have at least five working days to review Progress Report outcomes and report data inaccuracies to the Division of Academics, Performance, and Support before the superintendent completes the review. Prior to issuing a Final Rating to the principal, the superintendent will review the school s Progress Report, Quality Review reports, and other State accountability outcomes, Comprehensive Education Plan including the Language Allocation Policy, Annual Compliance Review report, and other important data about the school. The superintendent will assess the success in satisfying the goals and objectives in addition to the other PPR criteria. You may request a network representative to support you in this review process. You may also request to meet with your superintendent for further discussion.
5 Principal Performance Review: Evaluation Rubric A. Academic Performance Area Goals and Objectives (31%) 85% Progress Report (32%) 2 Activity Did the principal meet his/her Goals and Objectives? The school s Progress Report results: Final Evaluation Quality Review Score (22%) 3 The school s Quality Review score: Academic Performance Sub-Total B. Attention to Populations with Particular Needs Points Individualized Education Plan (IEP) mandated related and support services and SETSS were provided in a timely manner, and the first attend data was recorded into the computerized tracking system. 5% Special Education All special education evaluations were conducted within legally mandated timeframes: initial referrals were completed within sixty (60) calendar days of the receipt of parental consent; re-evaluations were completed within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of the referral; annual reviews of special education students were conducted as required. IEP teams made recommendations, to the extent appropriate, for services in the least restrictive environment, including maintaining the student in his or her current school. English Language Learners The Language Assessment Battery-Revised (LAB-R) was administered to all students whose home language is not English. Population with Particular Needs Sub-Total C. Compliance with Legal Mandates/Key DOE Policies 4 Points 10% Compliance with Legal Mandates/Key DOE Policies Sub-Total D. Computing the Overall Score Goals and Objectives (31%) + Progress Report (32%) + Quality Review (22%) + Populations with Particular Needs (5%) + Compliance (10%) = Overall Score (100%) Scores = Using the columns to the right, convert the Overall Score to the corresponding Rating. Overall Score Range Rating % 4 = Substantially Exceeds % 3 = Exceeds 53-70% 2 = Meets 31-52% 1 = Partially Meets 0-30% 0 = Does Not Meet See Appendix G for scoring details The Final Rating should be entered on page 6 subject to the considerations listed there
6 Principal Performance Review: Notes on Evaluation Rubric 1 The Substantially Exceeds score is reserved for truly outstanding performance. 2 Appendix B contains a link to more information about the progress report. 3 Appendix C contains a link to more information about the Quality Review. 4 The Office of Compliance Services (OCS) will assess each school s mid-year and year-end overall compliance with federal, state, and local laws, and with relevant Chancellor s Regulations. As part of this process, OCS will examine each school s success in addressing the important legal requirements for students with disabilities and English language learners that are delineated in Part B of the Evaluation Rubric. OCS will issue a report and recommendation to the superintendent covering compliance with federal, state, local laws, and Chancellor s regulations,. After reviewing the OCS report and consulting with the principal and the school s network representative, the superintendent will award youa score based on the school s success in satisfying the legal requirements for populations with particular needs (Part B above) and for compliance with legal and key DOE policy mandates (Part C above). Note that OCS has designed a compliance program to assist and support principals in identifying risks to the effective performance of critical educational and business functions. Schools that are not able to meet their compliance obligations should request assistance from OCS via the Network
7 Principal Performance Review: Final Rating and Summary (to be filled out by the superintendent) Principal s Name: School: Final Rating: Please check one. ( ) 0 = Does Not Meet ( ) 1 = Partially Meets ( ) 2 = Meets ( ) 3 = Exceeds ( ) 4 = Substantially Exceeds The Final Rating is the sum of the criteria as scored on the Evaluation Rubric on page 5. The Final Rating is subject to the superintendent s consideration of the following three guidelines which, as specifically set forth below, may result in a rating above or below the score on the Evaluation Rubric: Except in unusual circumstances, a principal s leadership of a school that was graded D or F on the most recent Progress Report and scored an Underdeveloped on the most recent Quality Review results in a Final Rating of Does Not Meet. The superintendent may change the Final Rating to partially meets or meets if the superintendent identifies, and the Chancellor approves, specific, identifiable reasons beyond the principal s control for the school s failure. Acceptable reasons must relate to (1) the principal s short time as the school s leader (including due to illness during the preceding year), (2) the principal s recent appointment to turn around a previously failing school, (3) the principal s achievement or surpassing of his/her goals and objectives, (4) other circumstances of at least the same magnitude and effect. Except in unusual circumstances, a principal s leadership of a school graded D on the Progress Report for two years in a row, or of a school graded C on the Progress Report for four years in a row, will result in a Final Rating of Does Not Meet. If the principal has served for all or nearly all of the two- or four- year period and the school scored below Developing on the most recent Quality Review, the final rating will result in Does Not Meet. If a Final Rating other than Does Not Meet is given in this situation, the superintendent must identify, and the Chancellor must approve, specific, identifiable reasons beyond the principal s control for the school s failure. Acceptable reasons must relate to (1) the principal s relatively short time as the school s leader (including due to illness during the preceding year), (2) the principal s achievement or surpassing of his/her goals and objectives; (3) other circumstances of at least the same magnitude and effect. If a principal leads a school that receives an overall score of 0 on any component of Part B or any category, e.g. Business and Funding, listed in the compliance checklist or desk review, or if a principal engaged in any misconduct or inappropriate conduct during the year, the superintendent may decrease the Final Rating. Whether or not a superintendent decreases the rating and, if so, by how much, depends upon the number of components or categories that are rated 0 and/or the frequency and severity of the misconduct or inappropriate conduct as assessed by the superintendent.
8 Principal Performance Review: Principal s Name: School: Final Rating: Please check one. ( ) 0 = Does Not Meet ( ) 1 = Partially Meets ( ) 2 = Meets ( ) 3 = Exceeds ( ) 4 = Substantially Exceeds Final Rating Summary: Using additional pages as needed, summarize the basis for the principal s Final Rating, referring to all aspects of the principal s performance. Identify strengths and priorities for next year. Attendance: Times No. First Year Time Lost Times Second Year Time Lost Times Third Year Time Lost Days in Car Days Hrs Min No. Days Hrs Min No. Days Hrs Min Or Borrowed Days Substitute Service No. of Days Lateness Absence (Exclude Non- Attendance) NOTE: For reports on probationers, complete 1 to 3 years as applicable. For all other personnel use First year to denote current year. All ratings of 0 and 1 are may be appealed. If a principal is downgraded for one of the reasons set forth in the bulleted paragraphs on page 6 of the PPR, then that principal may appeal the resulting downgraded rating, even if the rating is 2 or higher. All PPR appeals will be subject to the rules and procedures of the Office of Appeals and Reviews. This report has been seen and discussed by principal and superintendent. Date: Date: Principal s Signature: Superintendent s Signature:
9 Principal Performance Review: APPENDICES Appendix A - Goals and Objective Template Appendix B - Progress Report Guide For additional information about the Progress Report, please visit: or Appendix C - Quality Review Guide For additional information about the Quality Review, please go to: or Appendix D - Mid-year PPR Template Appendix E - NYCDOE School Leadership Competencies: EC293FDD68C9/0/NYCDOESchoolLeadershipCompetencyContinuum.pdf Appendix F - Details for Principal Performance Review Appendix G Additional Scoring Details
10 Principal Performance Review: Appendix A Principal Performance Review Goals and Objectives Template Principal s Name: School Name: Superintendent: Cluster: Date: Network Leader: District: Goals and Objectives Template: Identify a maximum of 5 Goals and Objectives. Please use this template for each goal. Goal Number 1 Goal Describe your goal. Measurable Objective Set the measurable target that will define whether or not you have met your goal. Action Plan Describe your plan for meeting your goal, including staffing, scheduling, and funding. Evidence Identify the objective evidence you will use throughout the year to evaluate your progress towards meeting your goal.
11 Principal Performance Review: Principal s Name: School Name: Superintendent: Cluster: Date: Network Leader: District: Goal Number 2 Goal Describe your goal. Measurable Objective Set the measurable target that will define whether or not you have met your goal. Action Plan Describe your plan for meeting your goal, including staffing, scheduling, and funding. Evidence Identify the objective evidence you will use throughout the year to evaluate your progress towards meeting your goal.
12 Principal Performance Review: Principal s Name: School Name: Superintendent: Cluster: Date: Network Leader: District: Goal Number 3 Goal Describe your goal. Measurable Objective Set the measurable target that will define whether or not you have met your goal. Action Plan Describe your plan for meeting your goal, including staffing, scheduling, and funding. Evidence Identify the objective evidence you will use throughout the year to evaluate your progress towards meeting your goal.
13 Principal Performance Review: Principal s Name: School Name: Superintendent: Cluster: Date: Network Leader: District: Goal Number 4 Goal Describe your goal. Measurable Objective Set the measurable target that will define whether or not you have met your goal. Action Plan Describe your plan for meeting your goal, including staffing, scheduling, and funding. Evidence Identify the objective evidence you will use throughout the year to evaluate your progress towards meeting your goal.
14 Principal Performance Review: Principal s Name: School Name: Superintendent: Cluster: Date: Network Leader: District: Goal Number 5 Goal Describe your goal. Measurable Objective Set the measurable target that will define whether or not you have met your goal. Action Plan Describe your plan for meeting your goal, including staffing, scheduling, and funding. Evidence Identify the objective evidence you will use throughout the year to evaluate your progress towards meeting your goal.
15 Principal Performance Review: Appendices B and C Appendix B - Progress Report Guide For additional information about the Progress Report, please visit: or Appendix C - Quality Review Guide For additional information about the Quality Review, please go to: or
16 Principal Performance Review: Principal Performance Review Mid-Year Summary Principal s Name: School Name: Superintendent: Cluster: Appendix D Network Leader: District: Date: (To be completed by the principal and submitted to the superintendent, via DOE . If you need additional time to complete this summary, please reach out to your superintendent.) The table will expand as you type. Goal 1: Objective: Summary: Goal 2: Objective: Summary: Goal 3: (If necessary) Objective: Summary: Goal 4: (If necessary) Objective: Summary:
17 Principal Performance Review: Goal 5: (If necessary) Objective: Summary: Summary of the progress you have made in meeting the expectations for Part B Attention to populations with special needs: Summary of the progress you have made in meeting the expectations for Part C Compliance with Legal Mandates/key DOE policies:
18 Principal Performance Review: Appendix E NYCDOE School Leadership Competencies: EC293FDD68C9/0/NYCDOESchoolLeadershipCompetencyContinuum.pdf
19 Principal Performance Review: From Part 4 Evaluation Rubric: Scoring Appendix F Details for Principal Performance Review A. Academic Performance a. Goals and Objectives (31%): The principal gets between 0 and 31 points based on the evaluation of the Superintendent as to whether the principal met his/her goals and objectives. Each goal will be equally weighted. b. Progress Report (32%): The principal gets between 0 and 32 points based on the school s Progress Report grade. Details are in the table below: The Progress Report grade will be converted to points using the conversion table below: A 32 B 24 C 18 D 10 F 0 c. Quality Review (22%): The principal gets between 0 and 22 points based on the school s Quality Review score. Details are in the table below: The Quality Review score will be converted using the conversion table below: Well developed 22 Proficient 15 Developing 8 Underdeveloped 0 *Schools that scored outstanding during the school year will be awarded 22 points until their next Quality Review. B. Attention to populations with Particular Needs C. Compliance with Legal Mandates / Key DOE policies- UPDATE FORTHCOMING Please see the Compliance section of the portal page for additional information. D. Final Rating The Overall Score for the PPR is the sum of parts A + B + C. The sum is then translated into a Final Rating for the principal. Sum of Parts A + B + C Rating % 4 = Substantially exceeds % 3 = Exceeds % 2 = Meets % 1 = Partially meets 0-30 % 0 = Does not meet
20 Principal Performance Review: Appendix G Additional Scoring Details For schools that do not get a Progress Report or Quality Review: Phase-out schools and new schools that do not receive a Progress Report grade will have the 32% of the PPR determined by the Progress Report grade added to the goals and objectives part of the PPR, making goals & objectives 63% of the overall PPR evaluation. Phase-out schools not undergoing a Quality Review will have the 22% determined by the Quality Review score added to the goals & objectives part of the PPR, making goals & objectives 53% of the overall PPR evaluation. If a school has neither a Progress Review grade nor a Quality Review score, the goals and objectives part will be 85% of the total PPR evaluation. For schools with multiple Progress Report grades: For schools that receive both an elementary/middle school Progress Report and a high school Progress Report grade, the sum of the points will be divided by two and the result will be used for the Progress Report part of the PPR. For example, if a school scores a C (18 points of the PPR ) score in the elementary/middle school Progress Report and a B (24 points of the PPR ) in the high school Progress Report, then the school will get a total of 21 points ( = 42/2 = 21) for the Progress Report section of the PPR. For principals not assigned as head of school : Principals who are not assigned as head of school and who are alternately assigned as principals (excessed principals, principal assigned, etc.) will be evaluated 100% on goals and objectives.
Performance Evaluation System Protocol. Licensed Executive Professionals
Colorado Springs School District 11 Dr. Nicholas Gledich, Superintendent Performance Evaluation System Protocol Licensed Executive Professionals Revised March 2014 235169.6 Department of Human Resources
Memorandum of Understanding. between. The New York City Department of Education. and. The New York State Education Department
Memorandum of Understanding between The New York City Department of Education and The New York State Education Department This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) sets forth the terms and understanding between
TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL
ISBE 23 ILLINOIS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 50 Section 50.10 Purpose 50.20 Applicability 50.30 Definitions TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES : EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION : PERSONNEL
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System Overview Teacher Effectiveness Student Achievement Student Achievement Stronge Evaluation System Effectiveness is the goal. Evaluation is merely
Within the context of this policy, the following definitions apply: B. Code A letter used to reflect the academic history of a student.
BOARD OF EDUCATION POLICY 8020 GRADING AND REPORTING: HIGH SCHOOL Effective: April 14, 2016 I. Policy Statement The Board of Education of Howard County is committed to ensuring that all students meet or
Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System. Teacher Evaluation Process Manual
Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System Teacher Evaluation Process Manual Updated February 2016 This manual is an interim update to remove inaccurate information. A more comprehensive update for 2016-17
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System. Frequently Asked Questions. General Questions
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Frequently Asked Questions General Questions Why is Gwinnett County Public Schools implementing a new evaluation system for teachers? Gwinnett s previous teacher evaluation
TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL
ISBE 23 ILLINOIS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 50 Section 50.10 Purpose 50.20 Applicability 50.30 Definitions TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES : EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION : PERSONNEL
PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
Employee Name: Position Title: Department: Supervisor Name: Date of Review: For Period: To At the beginning of each performance cycle, employee and supervisor establish performance objectives based on
Teacher Tenure 2011-12 Policy and Process Overview for Principals. NYCDOE School Year 2011-12
Teacher Tenure 2011-12 Policy and Process Overview for Principals NYCDOE School Year 2011-12 1 Session Outline 1. Teacher Tenure and the Citywide Instructional Expectations 2. Teacher Tenure Decision-Making
Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System. Principal Evaluation Process Manual
Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System Principal Evaluation Process Manual Updated February 2016 This manual is an interim update to remove inaccurate information. A more comprehensive update for 2016-17
MATTOON COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT #2 SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND FORMS
MATTOON COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT #2 SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND FORMS Revised 07/03/12 By David R. Skocy, Ph.D. Purpose: NON-TENURED SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER EVALUATION PROCEDURES
ETR PR-06 Form. Annotations for the New. Contents. Using the ETR Form document. Evaluation Team Report
Evaluation Team Report Annotations for the New ETR PR-06 Form The purpose of an evaluation under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is to determine whether a child is a child with a
Support Services Evaluation Handbook
Support Services Evaluation Handbook for members of Paraprofessionals and School-Related Personnel (PRSP), Baltimore Teachers Union, Local 340 City Union of Baltimore (CUB), Local 800 Baltimore City Public
James Rumsey Technical Institute Employee Performance and Effectiveness Evaluation Procedure
James Rumsey Technical Institute Employee Performance and Effectiveness Evaluation Procedure James Rumsey Technical Institute, a West Virginia state institution, is bound by Policy 5310, Performance Evaluation
STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES As Measures of Educator Effectiveness. A Guide For Principals
STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES As Measures of Educator Effectiveness A Guide For Principals WHAT IS AN SLO?... 3 WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF SLOS?... 3 SLOS IMPROVE TEACHER PRACTICE... 3 SLOS IMPROVE SCHOOLS...
Requirements & Guidelines for the Preparation of the New Mexico Online Portfolio for Alternative Licensure
Requirements & Guidelines for the Preparation of the New Mexico Online Portfolio for Alternative Licensure Prepared for the New Mexico Public Education Department Educator Quality Division http://www.ped.state.nm.us/
Fridley Alternative Compensation Plan Executive Summary
Fridley Alternative Compensation Plan Executive Summary Fridley School District Alternative Compensation Plan is a district wide program that is approved by the Minnesota Department of Education and was
Field Guide for the 2014-15 Principal Performance Review. A Guide for Principals and Evaluators
Field Guide for the 2014-15 Principal Performance Review A Guide for Principals and Evaluators Last updated: August 2015 Table of Contents Section Page Introduction 3 Measures of Leadership Practice 4
LAKE SILVER ELEMENTARY
Page 1 of 17 Accountability, Research, and Assessment School Improvement Plan 2010-2011 School Improvement Plan LAKE SILVER ELEMENTARY Approved by: Principal: 9/27/2010 Area Superintendent: 10/19/2010
Special Education Audit: Organizational, Program, and Service Delivery Review. Yonkers Public Schools. A Report of the External Core Team July 2008
Special Education Audit: Organizational, Program, and Service Delivery Review Yonkers Public Schools A Report of the External Core Team July 2008 The Collaborative Founded in 1994 Sponsored by the Education
Nutrition and Culinary Arts I. Example SLO
Nutrition and Culinary Arts Example SLO A Student Learning Objective (SLO) is a detailed process used to organize evidence of student growth over a specified period of time. The SLO process is appropriate
ALL PARENTS HAVE THE FOLLOWING RIGHTS: THE RIGHT TO A FREE PUBLIC SCHOOL EDUCATION.
Martine Guerrier Chief Family Engagement Officer [email protected] Each child s maximum potential can best be achieved through an active engagement between parents 1 and the education community.
Ohio School Counselor Evaluation Model MAY 2016
Ohio School Counselor Evaluation Model MAY 2016 Table of Contents Preface... 5 The Ohio Standards for School Counselors... 5 Ohio School Counselor Evaluation Framework... 6 School Counselor Evaluation
Teacher Guidebook 2014 15
Teacher Guidebook 2014 15 Updated March 18, 2015 Dallas ISD: What We re All About Vision Dallas ISD seeks to be a premier urban school district. Destination By The Year 2020, Dallas ISD will have the highest
ENROLLED SENATE BILL No. 103
Act No. 173 Public Acts of 2015 Approved by the Governor November 5, 2015 Filed with the Secretary of State November 5, 2015 EFFECTIVE DATE: November 5, 2015 Introduced by Senator Pavlov STATE OF MICHIGAN
Professional Education Unit
NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY Professional Education Unit ASSESSMENT SYSTEM HANDBOOK 2011/2012 PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNIT ASSESSMENT SYSTEM HANDBOOK Table of Contents The Unit Assessment System Overview...
inchester Public Schools
inchester Public Schools SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST EVALUATION School Psychologist Evaluation SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST EVALUATION Introduction The licensed personnel who staff our classrooms who provide related services
Rubric to Evaluate North Carolina s School-Based Physical Therapists
Rubric to Evaluate North Carolina s School-Based Physical Therapists Standard 1: School-based physical therapists demonstrate leadership. Element a. School-based physical therapists demonstrate leadership
Leadership Portfolio
California State University, Fresno Education Administration Program Developing Your Leadership Portfolio September 2005 Table of Contents What is the Leadership Portfolio?........... 1 Why develop the
Ferndale Area School District. ESL Program and Guidelines
Ferndale Area School District ESL Program and Guidelines Lynn Bennett ESL Coordinator Leonard Shurin ESL Curriculum and Staff Developer, IU08 Revised Summer 2010 ESL PROGRAM AND GUIDELINES 1. PROGRAM GOALS
Elementary Middle High School
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction PROCEDURAL COMPLIANCE SELF-ASSESSMENT EVALUATION PI-SA-RRC-EVAL-001 (Rev. 07-14) INSTRUCTIONS: Complete one copy for each student record selected for the sample.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR)
OSSINING UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT OSSINING, NEW YORK Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) PRINCIPAL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Adopted by the Board of Education July 23, 2014 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts AUDITOR OF THE COMMONWEALTH
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts AUDITOR OF THE COMMONWEALTH ONE ASHBURTON PLACE, ROOM 1819 BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02108 A. JOSEPH DeNUCCI AUDITOR TEL. (617) 727-6200 NO. 2008-1461-3A INDEPENDENT STATE
Teacher Performance Evaluation System TPES
Teacher Performance Evaluation System TPES The Code of Virginia 22.1253.13.5 states, in part, the following: B. Consistent with the finding that leadership is essential for the advancement of public education
Howard Lake-Waverly-Winsted Teacher Evaluation System
Howard Lake-Waverly-Winsted Teacher Evaluation System 1 Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model Howard Lake-Waverly-Winsted Schools The system described in this resource is the Minnesota Marzano Teacher Evaluation
Lebanese American University
Lebanese American University School of Arts and Sciences Graduate Student Guide October 2, 2015 1. Preamble This guide highlights major issues and questions that students may face during their graduate
Oklahoma Profile of State High School Exit Exam Policies 2012
OK PROFILE 1 Oklahoma Profile of State High School Exit Exam Policies 2012 State exit exam policy Beginning with students entering the 9 th grade in the 2008-09 school year, every student will be required
Oregon Administrative Rules Talented and Gifted
Oregon Administrative Rules Talented and Gifted 581-022-1310 Identification of Academically Talented and Intellectually Gifted Students (1) Each school district shall have local district policies and procedures
6.9 6.9.1. GRADING SYSTEMS
6.9 The professional staff will develop a program of studies which encourages students to continually strive for self-improvement and success in their academic work. 6.9.1. GRADING SYSTEMS Periodic grade
Alternate Route to Interim Teaching Certification Program Application
Office of Professional Preparation Services Alternate Route to Interim Teaching Certification Program Application For Educator Preparation Providers seeking approval to offer an alternate route to interim
Middle School (Grades 6-8) Measures of Student Learning Guide
Middle School (Grades 6-8) Measures of Student Learning Guide A Guide for School Committees and Principals June 21, 2013 Introduction Audience This document is intended as a guide to support principals
LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Policy Bulletin
TITLE: NUMBER: ISSUER: Performance Evaluation for UTLA Bargaining Unit Personnel John E. Deasy, Ph.D. Superintendent Justo Avila, Chief Human Resources Officer Human Resources Division Rachel Bonkovsky,
Pre-service Performance Assessment Professional Standards for Teachers: See 603 CMR 7.08
Please use this assessment in conjunction with the for Teachers guidelines: the rating scale; evaluation questions relating to the standards; and the license-specific questions per standard (b)2c. Candidates
TENNESSEE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Alternative Education Program Model/Standards Standard 1.0: Mission An exemplary alternative education program operates with a clearly stated mission, a formal set of standards, and a plan for program
Salt Lake City School District Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Writing Template
This SLCSD SLO Writing Template is to be used by educators writing SLOs as a measure of student growth for educator evaluation. Course/Grade Level Information Course name 3D Animation Brief course description
LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT REFERENCE GUIDE
REFERENCE GUIDE TITLE: NUMBER: ISSUER: Issuance of Diplomas or Certificates of Completion for All Eligible Grade 12 Students with Disabilities DATE: Jaime R. Aquino, Ph.D. Deputy Superintendent of Instruction
WAC 180-17-050 Release of a school district from designation as a. required action district. (1) The state board of education shall release
Exhibit C WAC 180-17-050 Release of a school district from designation as a required action district. (1) The state board of education shall release a school district from designation as a required action
Home Schooling Liaison Service. Table of Contents. Academic Assessment Report - Option 1 - Achievement Testing*
Home Schooling Liaison Service Table of Contents Procedures for Home Education Ohio Home Education Notification Form Sample Curriculum and Texts Ohio State Board of Education - Academic Assessment Academic
Believe and Succeed: Louisiana's Initiative to Transform Struggling Schools. Grant Application. John White State Superintendent of Education
Believe and Succeed: Louisiana's Initiative to Transform Struggling Schools Grant Application John White State Superintendent of Education December 17, 2013 1 Table of Contents I. Introduction... 3 II.
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROFESSIONAL STUDENT SERVICES PERSONNEL (PSSP)
BOARD PROCEDURE Approval Date 2015 Review Date 2020 Contact Person/Department Human Resources Administrator Replacing All previous procedures Page 1 of 20 Identification HR 4525 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROFESSIONAL
Bilingual Education Student Information Survey (BESIS) Manual Special Education 2009 10
Chief Achievement Office Students with Disabilities and ELLs Fall 2009 Bilingual Education Student Information Survey (BESIS) Manual Special Education 2009 10 Purpose The Bilingual Education Student Information
Administration A. Superintendent 1. Student Teacher University Agreement Template
Dr. Bruce Law Pamela Bylsma Tammy Prentiss Domenico Maniscalco Bill Eagan Superintendent Assistant Superintendent Assistant Superintendent Chief Human Chief Financial of Schools for Academics for Student
A. Student Learning Outcomes (SLO) for the M.S. Degree: Students will
1 A. Student Learning Outcomes (SLO) for the M.S. Degree: Students will 1. Demonstrate general content proficiency in three subject areas of the chemical sciences, and specific content proficiency within
FY15 DANVERS PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT GOALS THEME I ACHIEVEMENT
FY15 DANVERS PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT GOALS THEME I ACHIEVEMENT Goal: Curriculum, instruction and assessment necessary to support 21 st century learning and effectively meet the needs of all students are
Frequently Asked Questions: The IEP Process and Development of the IEP Document
Volume I, Version I Frequently Asked Questions: The IEP Process and Development of the IEP Document Published by: In Collaboration with: What procedures must be followed prior to holding an IEP Team meeting?
Policies for Evaluating Faculty: Recommendations for Incorporating Student and Peer Reviews in the Faculty Evaluation Process DRAFT
Policies for Evaluating Faculty: Recommendations for Incorporating Student and Peer Reviews in the Faculty Evaluation Process DRAFT Overview In 2011, The University of Texas System Chancellor unveiled
MOE Online Class Quality Guidelines
MOE Online Class Quality Guidelines The following guidelines were developed by the MiraCosta Online Educators committee to inform online faculty of required elements for Distance Education classes, offer
N.J.A.C. 6A:17, EDUCATION FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN AND STUDENTS IN STATE FACILITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS
N.J.A.C. 6A:17, EDUCATION FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN AND STUDENTS IN STATE FACILITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBCHAPTER 1 6A:17-1.1 6A:17-1.2 GENERAL PROVISIONS Purpose Definitions SUBCHAPTER 2 6A:17-2.1 6A:17-2.2
Appeal to Graduate with a Lower Score on a Regents Examination Information
THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT / THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 89 Washington Avenue Albany, NY 12234 Appeal to Graduate with a Lower Score on a Regents Examination Information General Information
THE FOUR NON NEGOTIABLES
THE FOUR NON NEGOTIABLES ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS SAFE AND SUPPORTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT PURPOSEFUL, TIMELY TWO WAY COMMUNICATION ECISD STRATEGIC PLAN 2015 2016 1 Beliefs Definition:
EVALUATION RUBRICS FOR COUNSELORS
EVALUATION RUBRICS FOR COUNSELORS Standards & Elements The evaluation system for school counselors is based on 5 Standards and 13 Elements. These Elements describe important competencies of effective school
Professional Clinical Ladder Program Application
Professional Clinical Ladder Program Application Table of Contents Introduction Letter 2 New Applicant Process 3 Getting Started 4 Application Process Diagram 5 Demographic Profile 6 How to Write a Narrative
Q Comp Requirements and Guiding Principles
Q Comp Requirements and Guiding Principles Program Purposes The purpose of the Q Comp program is for participating school districts, intermediate school districts, integration districts, state schools/academies
Autism Spectrum Disorder Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria Rubric
Autism Spectrum Disorder Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria Rubric 1. Professional Knowledge The teacher demonstrates an understanding of curriculum, subject content, and the developmental needs
THE New York City DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DIVISION OF HUMAN RESOURCES AND TALENT 65 COURT STREET BROOKLYN, NEW YORK 11201
PERSONNEL MEMORANDUM NO. 5, 2013-2014 THE New York City DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DIVISION OF HUMAN RESOURCES AND TALENT 65 COURT STREET BROOKLYN, NEW YORK 11201 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: All Superintendents, Executive
IHE Evidence XXX XXX XXX
UNA Edited 5/24/2013 Page 1 of 8 IHE Evidence TEAM Comments 290-3-3-.53.01. (1) Rationale. Grounded in the Alabama Standards for Leaders, and building on the knowledge and abilities developed at the Class
Illinois Center for School Improvement Framework: Core Functions, Indicators, and Key Questions
Framework: Core Functions, Indicators, and Key Questions The Core Functions and Indicators, which form the structure for the delivery and execution of (Illinois CSI) services, describe the big ideas or
Chapter 6: Individualized Education Programs (IEPs)
33 Chapter 6: Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) In this chapter you will: learn the parts of an IEP learn who is on an IEP team discover tips and things to remember when working on the IEP understand
Fact Sheet 15-13 UPDATED January 2016
UPDATED Fact Sheet Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) January 2016 Page 1 ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW (APPR) Fact Sheet 15-13 UPDATED January 2016 The 2015 state budget included replacing
Teacher and Leader Evaluation Requirements An Overview
Teacher and Leader Evaluation Requirements An Overview Teacher and Leader Evaluation Requirements: An Overview The Office of the State Superintendent of Education (OSSE) believes that all District of Columbia
A Guide for the Appointment of a Principal in a Private School in Dubai 2015-2016
A Guide for the Appointment of a Principal in a Private School in Dubai 2015-2016 A Guide for the Appointment of a Principal in a Private School in Dubai 2015-2016 Foreword: The Knowledge and Human Development
Allen Elementary School
Allen Elementary School April 4, 216 Dear Parents and Community Members: We are pleased to present you with the (AER), which provides key information on the 214-15 educational progress for the. The AER
TEAM PLANNING AND REPORTING
Chapter 10 TEAM PLANNING AND REPORTING TOOLS: Tool 10.1 Tool 10.2 Tool 10.3 Tool 10.4 Tool 10.5 Sample team plan. 3 pages Team planning template. 3 pages Alternative team planning template. 1 page Team
USDA New Supervisor Training Standard
USDA Virtual University, College of Leadership and Professional Development United States Department of Agriculture Office of Human Resources Management Virtual University 1400 independence Avenue, SW
Interpretive Guide for the Achievement Levels Report (2003 Revision) ITBS/ITED Testing Program
Interpretive Guide for the Achievement Levels Report (2003 Revision) ITBS/ITED Testing Program The purpose of this Interpretive Guide is to provide information to individuals who will use the Achievement
GUID 5950 School Counseling Internship Application and Information
GUID 5950 School Counseling Internship Application and Information Dear Student: The information is designed to facilitate the Internship application process and to enhance the quality of the Internship
Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University
Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University A. A description of how the proposed program has been revisioned to reflect
SECTION II CSA Sabbaticals
THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DIVISION OF HUMAN RESOURCES 65 COURT STREET BROOKLYN, NEW YORK 11201 PERSONNEL MEMORANDUM NO. 2 2015-2016 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: All Superintendents, Executive Directors,
3) Do you have "model" responses/answers to the questions that can be shared? Response: No.
Question and Answers for the Request for Application #15-068, Community College Basic Skills and Student Outcomes Transformation Program 1) How are you defining student support in instructional activities?
08X540. School For Community Research and Learning 1980 Lafayette Avenue School Address: Bronx, NY 10473
NYSED/NYCDOE JOINT INTERVENTION TEAM REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS BEDS Code/DBN: 08X540 School Name: School For Community Research and Learning 1980 Lafayette Avenue School Address: Bronx, NY 10473 Principal:
MNCIMP:SR Record Review Training
Top part of screen to enter dates Bottom part of screen to enter citations MNCIMP:SR Record Review Training Part B Timelines Timeline citations are not automatically generated. Reviewers will need to make
1. Student Teachers Page 2 2. Cooperating Teachers Page 5 3. Principals Page 7 4. Frequently Asked Questions Page 8
Office of Teacher Recruitment and Quality New York City Department of Education 65 Court Street Brooklyn, NY 11201 Email: [email protected] Student Teaching Handbook This handbook
Public Act 101 of 2011: Amendments to the Michigan Teacher Tenure Law
On July 19 th 2011, Governor Snyder signed into law the Teacher Quality and Tenure Reform bill package. These new laws make major changes to the Teacher Tenure Act, Revised School Code, and Public Employee
