ADDENDUM #1. Request for Proposals. COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM UPGRADE Proposal # 12-IS-001. Kenneth J. Schmidt



Similar documents
CITY OF OAK CREEK VoIP Telephone System Addendum

PROPOSALS REQUESTED THE TOWN OF OLD ORCHARD BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR IP-BASED VOICE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF SHELBY REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. Voice over IP System

Request for Proposals Voice over Internet Protocol Unified Communications System /2016

Request for Proposals Voice over Internet Protocol Unified Communications System /2016

Request for Proposal NORTEL TELEPHONE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE SERVICES. Luzerne County Information Technology Department LUZERNE COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA

Request for Proposal for Telephone System Hosted VoIP System On Premise VoIP System Hybrid IP System #RFP PHONE SYSTEM 1

Addendum SOLICITATION NAME ADDENDUM NUMBER. VOIP Telephone System C DATE

Lake County, Oregon Request for Proposal VoIP Telephone Communications System

The Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District requests quotations for. IP Telephony System

WISSAHICKON SCHOOL DISTRICT

RFP No. DPS FY15 UC. ANSWER: Yes, we are seeking Priority 1 Cloud Based solutions.

Enterprise Managed PBX Telephony

CLARK-PLEASANT COMMUNITY SCHOOLS

COMPLETE YOUR GO-TO-MARKET PLAN BUSINESS SOLUTIONS BARRY DERRICK PRODUCT MARKETING MANAGER

RFP 1337 Board approved Posted, 14 October, 2009

GARTNER REPORT: SIP TRUNKING

Clayton County Central Services

Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Phone System and Related Professional Services

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR. IP Phone System. Issue Date: April 1, Submittal Date: May 1, 2015 at 12:00 P.M. Contact: Tricia A.

Virtualizing Open Text Fax Server with Realtime Fax over IP and Open Text Fax Gateway

Request for Proposal RFP No. IT Phone System Replacement

The number LEON COUNTY NG9-1-1, RFP # BC Addendum #3

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

WEXFORD COUNTY REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

EL SEGUNDO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) VoIP TELEPHONY INSTALLATION #06 16 ADDENDUM 2

Q1 R1 Q2 R3 Q4 Q6 R6 Q7 R7 Q8 R8

Request for Proposals (RFP) for Mobile Phone/Data Service & Unified Communications and Collaboration System with Call Center Capability

Request for Proposals: Telecommunications and Local and Long Distance Services. Response to RFIs/Questions. Updated January 23, 2013

What s New in Converged Access and Unified Business Solutions

Request for Proposal - Business Telephone System

TCSD E- Rate Questions and Answers

The Cost Advantages of Using a Hosted Unified Communications Service A Total-Cost-of-Ownership Guide for Small and Mid-sized Businesses (SMBs)

DCADLEC RFP Clarifications

CLARITY 40OO SERIES IP HANDSET - IP PBX

City of Bismarck, ND Maintenance and Support for Mitel 3300 Voice System. Request for Proposal (RFP)

City of Sacramento VoIP Deployment Project. Presentation to State of California IP Telephony Working Group

Peer-to-Peer SIP Mode with FXS and FXO Gateways

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR INTERNAL CONNECTIONS. INCLUDING EQUIPMENT and. VoIP TELEPHONE SYSTEM FOR THE ALTERNATE HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING

City of Milwaukie VoIP RFP

How To Make A Phone System More Reliable And Reliable

TLN VoIP Q&A Document

ROANE COUNTY SCHOOLS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL TELEPHONE SYSTEM AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

At the PAC, how many ports are in each of the 3 Catalyst 3560G switches. Do you know how many IP phones will be assigned to each of the switches?

What s New in Converged Access and Unified Business Solutions. Tim Saunders VP, Product Management ADTRAN Enterprise Networks Division

IP Telephony Deployment Models

SWSD Phone Proposal. Presenter: Tom Atkins June 26 th 2013

RFB VOICE OVER IP HARDWARE AND RELATED SERVICES QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS As of October 5, 2011

Woodland Hills School District Request for Proposals VOICE OVER IP (VOIP) Telephone Communication System

RFP # ADDENDUM #1 & ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT

Van Buren County Unified Voice Communication RFP

WHITE PAPER. The Cost Advantages of Using a Hosted

Internet Telephony Terminology

Request for Proposal Phone System Clark County Department of Job and Family Services

The Top 7 Dos and Don ts of Choosing a Telephone System Upgrade. Or Why you may or may not wish to use your DMS provider

Request for Proposal 911- SUPPLEMENTAL ALI DATABASE MANAGEMENT SERVICES AND SUPPORT

RFP Addendum #3 Districtwide VOIP System THE FOLLOWING CLARIFICATIONS TO THE ABOVE CITED SOLICITATION ARE ANNOUNCED.

Hosted VoIP RFP. For. Adams County School District 50

City of Woodinville, Washington

Re: RFP # 08-X Communication/Telecommunication Cable, Wire and Associated Products ADDENDUM # 6

AudioCodes Gateway in the Lync Environment

Request for Proposal- Network Switches and Professional Services

CITY OF BLAINE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL IP TELEPHONY SYSTEMS CONSULTANT

Request for Proposal Bid Number IS

ARCHITECTURAL PARTNERS, P.C. 10 Ninth Street, Lynchburg, Va / Fax 434/

MINUTES. Pre-Submission Meeting

Specifications for VOIP Telephone System, Data Distribution and Protection and Associated Wireless Infrastructure

Question and Answer No. 1 Request for Proposals (RFP) Central Collections Unit (CCU) Contact Center Solution Solicitation Number F50B

PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING: October 5, 2011 AT 10:00 AM at the address below or by

Cisco IP Telephony. Presented By Alastair Brand NETintellect

SERVICE PROVIDER CRITERIA AND CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

COUNTY OF PERTH Request for Proposal. VoIP Telephone System

ADDENDUM. University of (702) ANSWER: A. INITIAL TERM. Page 1

Are there limits on the number of years the district would agree to under contract? Please See RFP

SAN RFP Questions and Answers

Cisco Emergency Responder 9.0

Transcription:

Racine County Purchasing Racine County Courthouse Kenneth J. Schmidt 730 Wisconsin Avenue Purchasing Coordinator Racine, WI 53403-1274 Phone (262) 636-3706 Fax (262) 636-3700 ADDENDUM #1 Request for Proposals COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM UPGRADE Proposal # 12-IS-001 This Addendum has been prepared by: Racine County Kenneth J. Schmidt Date: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 This Addendum is issued as stated in the original Request for Proposal on page 2 in INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS, section D to address questions received from vendors requesting clarification from Racine County on the specifications provided for the above subject request for proposals: 1) Is the County open to a phased install over the course of a few months to completion or is the County only interested in what we call a hot cut which is all sites happening at once? Racine County is open to different implementation techniques and will defer to the expertise and design of the chosen vendor to recommend the best plan for installation. 2) What is the timeframe for completion of sites to a new solution? Racine County seeks to have the entire project completed by March 31, 2013. The timeframe for each individual site to be completed is flexible. 3) Should we assume that the County has CAT5 cabling where there are analog phones, or should respondents include CAT5 cabling in their proposed solution? Racine County will provide Cat5/Cat5e/Cat6 cabling to all IP stations. For existing analog phones, the County cannot guarantee that Cat5 cabling exists at all locations. Page 1

4) Because vendors must include quotes for all required telecommunications services, vendors may need to work together to provide a complete solution. Will Racine County please provide a list of all vendors that attended the mandatory site visit? Racine County sent an e-mail on July 12, 2012 to all site visit vendor attendees which included an attachment detailing all July 11, 2012 Racine County phone upgrade site visit attendees and associated telephone numbers. A copy of this attendee file is also attached to this RFP Addendum. 5) In Section IV.C the maintenance contract term is stated as three years and in Section VII.8 it states five years? Please clarify the term of the maintenance contract. Racine County is expecting 5 years as a base for maintenance / cost of ownership proposals. Please feel free to offer additional options, if applicable. To correct conflicting language as noted within the RFP, the following language revisions are made: Warranties and Guarantees C. 1 (page 9) is revised to read: Vendor shall submit all Terms and Conditions for a five (5) year full maintenance agreement on each system that includes all parts and labor for service performed to commence upon system acceptance. Vendor shall detail all services that are included with the full maintenance agreement for each year, the location of the vendor facility, the hours of operation and the service contract person. Proposal Requirements A. Award Criteria (page 14) is revised to read: 4. Proposed pricing 25 points Initial one time cost equipment installation services Cost of new telecommunication services required to run application Provide pricing for additional functional licenses (blocks or individual) 5-year cost of ownership (on-going support and maintenance) Estimated cost and timing of equipment refresh. 6) What are the maintenance expectations for the contract (managed, self managed, shared)? Racine County has no defined expectations for the contract in advance of vendor recommendations. The County is soliciting vendor recommendation of available options through the RFP. 7) Will a bid bond be required? Racine County does not require a bid bond. Page 2

8) Please define user requirements for end user training. Racine County is seeking Vendor recommendation and available options in the area of End User Training. 9) Please identify timeframes, requirements and preferences for deployment schedules. Racine County seeks to have the entire project completed by March 31, 2013. The timeframe for each individual site to be completed is flexible. 10) Will acceptance and payment be conducted on a site by site basis or for the entire project? Acceptance of the project will be conducted following completion of the project in its entirety. Payment terms are defined in the RFP. 11) Two stipulations of project acceptance appear on page 9 (E) and 10 (C); please define any additional acceptance terms. If this is a phased implementation and acceptance is done on a location basis, how will future networking be factored into the system acceptance? Racine County will review contract acceptance terms during the scope of work / contract negotiations for phone system upgrade. 12) Please confirm that the warranty period will begin when the equipment is accepted / or on-site. Racine County expects Vendor to provide a proposal for equipment acceptance and warranty period timing. 13) Please define High Availability (HA). Does your definition include or exclude HA of LAN/WAN facilities? For the purposes of this communications systems project, HA refers to high availability from the voice standpoint. Racine County seeks to have redundant voice gateways, redundant connections to the PSTN (preferably in separate buildings), and redundant network uplinks from said voice gateways into the existing network. This definition excludes the existing LAN/WAN redundancy, but Racine County is open to making necessary changes and adjustments to further bolster redundancy. 14) How many UC seats are required? Racine County would like Vendors to use 250 as a starting point for Unified Communication and cost of additional seats up to 1000 users. Tiered or individual increments may be used. 15) Discuss CDP/Link layer availability throughout the network. Racine County has both CDP and LLDP available at every switch port in the county where an IP telephone would connect. Page 3

16) What type of virtual environment currently exists and at which facilities? Racine County currently leverages a clustered VMware ESXi 4.1 environment at the Court House and a clustered VMware ESXi 4.0 environment at the Human Services building at Taylor Ave. Standalone VMware hosts are in place at Ives Grove, Burlington Service Center, and Ridgewood Care Center. 17) What is the current capacity and availability of the existing virtual servers? Is there sufficient capacity for additional voice applications in the existing virtual servers? Racine County does have a virtual environment, but vendor should provide a standalone estimate for purpose of proposal. Vendor should provide virtual server option as alternative. 18) Can you provide recent data for WAN performance and availability? See attached WAN performance documents. 19) The RFP states that there is fiber between the courthouse and LEC. Is there any copper cable between locations and what is the approximate length of the cables? Racine County has 200 pair telephone cable between locations. Approximate length is 350 feet. 20) In Warranties & Guarantees letter E. Training: Will vendor train the trainer or train the entire user staff? Racine County is seeking Vendor s recommendations and options in the area of End User Training. 21) What is Racine County existing paging system information by building? Paging Systems One (1) system at Ridgewood One (1) system at the Patrol Station One (1) system at Ives Grove Public Works One (1) system at Courthouse DA office One (1) system at Taylor The paging systems work from any digital or analog phone. The user dials a number code and then states page. The paging systems are connected to a feed from the PBX via either a Trunk or Equipment Number (EN). Each PBX has its own number plan and can only page in its building. Page 4

22) What is Racine County Call Center Specifications? Racine County currently does not have formal Call Center Software. For quoting purposes, Racine County has requirements for 25 seats in three unique locations of Call Center functionality. Please sign, date and attach a copy of this addendum to your Proposal. Firm: Signature: Date: Page 5