Successful Transition. Quality. Quality Improvement. Assurance



Similar documents
ADEPT for Library Media Specialists

School Guidance Counselor

Utah Educational Leadership Standards, Performance Expectations and Indicators

Performance Evaluation System Protocol. Licensed Executive Professionals

Reflective Practice: Goals for Professional Growth Library Media Specialist

u Field Experience Handbook for Supervising Library Media Teacher or Teacher Librarian

North Carolina TEACHER. evaluation process. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction

The University of Mississippi School of Education

The Ohio Resident Educator Program Standards Planning Tool Final

360 Dr. Mike Richie SUPERINTENDENT LEADERSHIP PERFORMANCE

Candidates will demonstrate ethical attitudes and behaviors.

Mississippi School Librarian Evaluation

EXAMPLE FIELD EXPERIENCE PLANNING TEMPLATE CCSU MAT Program

Chapter 8a Public Education Human Resource Management Act. Part 1 General Provisions

EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM Recognition. Standards:

SUMMATIVE EVALUATION REPORT (Library Media Specialist) Library Media Specialist: School: Date:

OCSD School Leadership Program. Where Do We Stand and Where Are We Going?

ADEPT Performance Standards. for. Classroom-Based Teachers

Colorado Professional Teaching Standards

School Counselor Performance Appraisal Instrument

Approved by the Virginia Board of Education on September 27, Virginia Department of Education P. O. Box 2120 Richmond, Virginia

University of South Carolina School of Library & Information Science. A Checklist of Certification Requirements for School Librarian Candidates

IHE Evidence XXX XXX XXX

North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards

Self-Assessment Duval County School System. Level 3. Level 3. Level 3. Level 4

Commission on Teacher Credentialing. Education Specialist Clear Program Standards

NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS

Framework for Leadership

of independent decisionmaking.

Engineering/Architectural Manager Competency Profile

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists Definition of an Effective School Psychologist

The performance assessment shall measure the extent to which the teacher s planning:

University of South Carolina School of Library & Information Science

Professional School Counselor Evaluation Criteria with Descriptors

School Library Media Specialist (502)

Such alternatives to the above qualifications as the board may find appropriate and acceptable.

SCHOOL COUNSELOR. Position Summary

TOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES

CALIFORNIA PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE CREDENTIAL EXAMINATION (CPACE)

NAAS - inacol Standards for Quality Online Programs

Your Career At CREC. Imagining Your Professional Future

The North Carolina Recent Graduate Survey Report

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Speech- Language Pathologists

Pennsylvania Core Competencies for Instructors Self Assessment Checklist

Dr. Mark Scott, Superintendent

POSITION: Speech Language Pathologist

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School-Based Occupational Therapists

Education Leadership (ISLLC) Standards Comparison of Old (2007) and New Standards (2015)

Self Assessment Tool for Principals and Vice-Principals

Ayers Institute Leadership Resources: PSEL Alignment

ASU College of Education Course Syllabus ED 4972, ED 4973, ED 4974, ED 4975 or EDG 5660 Clinical Teaching

New Jersey Professional Standards for Teachers Alignment with InTASC NJAC 6A:9C-3.3 (effective May 5, 2014)

ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS (2013)

James Rumsey Technical Institute Employee Performance and Effectiveness Evaluation Procedure

Model for Instructional Improvement. Teacher Evaluation

Section Three: Ohio Standards for Principals

Mississippi Counselor Appraisal Rubric M-CAR

Leadership Portfolio

GEORGIA STANDARDS FOR THE APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNITS AND EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS

How To Teach Authentic Learning

Arkansas Teaching Standards

MASTER S COURSES FASHION & LUXURY BRAND MANAGEMENT

RUBRIC FOR LIBRARY MEDIA SPECIALISTS (LMS) DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION

PRO-NET A Publication of Building Professional Development Partnerships for Adult Educators Project. April 2002

Key Assessments School Library Media Specialist

Section 3: Individual Professional Development Plan (IPDP) Resources Pages 14-18

Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation

Masters Comprehensive Exam and Rubric (Rev. July 17, 2014)

GEORGIA TEACHER ACADEMY FOR PREPARATION AND PEDAGOGY (GaTAPP)

Programme Specification

TEACHER CERTIFICATION STUDY GUIDE INFORMATION ACCESS AND DELIVERY IN THE LIBRARY MEDIA PROGRAM

MSc, PG Dip, PG Cert in Advanced Nursing Practice

Western Kentucky University Department of Counseling and Student Affairs School Counseling Site Supervisor Evaluation Form

Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in Counselor Education and Supervision Program Applicant:

Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan. Maine Township High School District 207. Our mission is to improve student learning.

ONE YEAR COURSES FASHION IMAGE & STYLING INTENSIVE

Ohio School Counselor Evaluation Model MAY 2016

STANDARDS FOR THE MASTER OF LIBRARY SCIENCE DEGREE/ SCHOOL LIBRARY MEDIA COORDINATOR LICENSE

Revised CA Teacher Induction Program Standards for Mentoring General Education Clear Teaching Credential Candidates

St. Charles School District. Counselor Growth Guide and. Evaluation Documents

ILLINOIS CERTIFICATION TESTING SYSTEM

Curriculum, Instruction, and Professional Development EDS

Framework and Guidelines for Principal Preparation Programs

FITNESS FOR THE PROFESSION OF COUNSELING

Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation

The school principal practices effective cultural leadership when he or she

CHAPTER 77 STANDARDS FOR TEACHER INTERN PREPARATION PROGRAMS

Transcription:

ADEPT for School Library Media Specialists 1

ADEPT Web Site http://www.scteachers.org 2

ADEPT Cycle Quality Improvement Successful Transition Quality Assurance 3

ADEPT Levels Induction Formal Evaluation Diagnostic Assistance (optional) Informal Evaluation 4

South Carolina Department of Education INDUCTION Transition Assistance Teacher Contract Levels Effective 7/22/04 Ready Not Ready ANNUAL 1 Formal Eval. ANNUAL 1 Diagnostic (Eval. Simulation) + Assistance Met Not Met CONTINUING (if eligible for Professional Certificate) or ANNUAL (e.g.,pace, C&T) GBE or Discretionary Formal Eval. Met CONTINUING GBE or Discretionary Formal Eval Met ANNUAL 2 Diagnostic (Eval. Simulation) + Assistance ANNUAL 3 Formal Eval. Not Met Ineligible to teach until after 2 years and stateapproved remediation plan completed, then ANNUAL 4 Formal Eval. CONTINUING (if eligible for Professional Certificate) or ANNUAL (e.g., C&T) GBE or Discretionary Formal Eval. Met Met ANNUAL 2 Formal Eval. CONTINUING GBE or Discretionary Formal Eval. Met Not Met ANNUAL 3 Formal Eval. Not Met Ineligible to teach until after 2 years and stateapproved remediation plan completed, then ANNUAL 4 Formal Eval. Met Not Met Met Not Met CONTINUING GBE or Discretionary Formal Eval. OUT OF PROFESSION CONTINUING GBE or Discretionary Formal Eval. OUT OF PROFESSION

Performance Dimensions Are South Carolina s professional practice standards d for school library media specialists. Were developed d by a statewide t group of library media specialists representing public schools and institutions of higher education Are aligned with established standards for the profession. Apply to LMSs throughout their career continuum 6

Key Considerations (Evidence Documentation) Are examples of components of each performance dimension Are not necessarily all of equal importance Are not universally applicable to all LMSs in all settings Are context-specific t 7

PD 1: Long-Range Planning The library media specialist develops a long- range plan (LRP) that appropriately describes and/or references goals, objectives, policies, and procedures related to the administration and management of the library media center including the plans for collaboration, assessment, communications, and advocacy that are designed to meet the specific information and technology needs of the school community. 8

PD 1: Key Considerations (Evidence Documentation) Description of specific information and technology needs of school community. Appropriate program and objectives. Appropriate p policies and procedures for administering the library media center. Appropriate p policies and procedures for managing the resource collection. 9

PD 1: Key Considerations (Evidence Documentation) Ways in which the LMS will integrate information literacy and technology into the academic curriculum. Formal and informal assessments to evaluate the library media center and services. Ways of informing the school community about library media services. 10

PD 2: Administering the Library Media Program The library media specialist effectively administers and manages the library media center to ensure the efficient use of available space, resources, and services. 11

PD 2: Key Considerations (Evidence Documentation) Implements policies and procedures to maximize use of the library media center services, resources, and space. Communicates policies and procedures to school community. Appropriately administers the library media center budget. Supervises other professionals and non- professionals poesso as who oassst assist in the library bay media center. 12

PD 3: Collaboration for Instruction and Services The library media specialist promotes student achievement by working collaboratively with teachers to plan and deliver instruction that effectively integrates information literacy and technology into the state s curriculum standards. 13

PD 3: Key Considerations (Evidence Documentation) Establishes effective instructional partnerships. Integrates standards: information literacy, technology education, and curriculum. Assists students in developing skills to access and use information independently. Promotes reading and literature appreciation. 14

PD 3: Key Considerations (Evidence Documentation) Establishes appropriately high expectations for students. Monitors the impact of the instructional partnerships on student achievement, and makes adjustments as appropriate. 15

PD 4: Library Media Collection & Resource Management The library media specialist appropriately selects, acquires, organizes, circulates, maintains, provides access to, and promotes the use of a diverse collection of resources and technologies. 16

PD 4: Key Considerations (Evidence Documentation) Effectively implements a collection- development policy. Involves members of the learning community in the selection and continuous evaluation of materials and resources. Develops an appropriate circulation policy and maintains an efficient circulation system. Makes materials a easily accessible e to patrons. 17

PD 5: Maintaining an Environment Conducive to Inquiry The library media specialist creates a safe, attractive, open, and accessible environment that is conducive to inquiry and learning. 18

PD 5: Key Considerations (Evidence Documentation) Provides maximum access to the library media center resources, including physical adaptations if needed. Creates a safe, attractive, and inviting environment that is conducive to learning and inquiry. Provides assistance, information, support, and/or instruction to all members of the learning community. 19

PD 6: Assessing the Library Media Program The library media specialist conducts appropriate assessments of the library media collection, instructional program, and facility so that he or she can use the results of these evaluations to enhance the school s library media resources and services. 20

PD 6: Key Considerations (Evidence Documentation) Uses a variety of formal and informal data collection methods to continuously evaluate the effectiveness of the program. Uses assessment results to guide decision making. 21

PD 7: Fulfilling Professional Responsibilities s The library media specialist consistently demonstrates ethically based professional behavior and participates p in continuous professional development. 22

PD 7: Key Considerations (Evidence Documentation) Maintains positive professional relationships. Adheres to ethical standards. Balances other assigned duties with professional responsibilities. Demonstrates positive work habits (self- management; quality of work). 23

PD 7: Key Considerations (Evidence Documentation) Contributes to the well-being of students, the benefit of the overall school community, and the advancement of the profession. Identifies own professional strengths and weaknesses. Displays professional insight and vision. Sets purposeful professional goals. 24

Year 1 Teaching Certificate License issued by the State Department of Education. Contract Employment p y agreement issued by the local school district. ADEPT Process Initial Certificate Induction One year; nonrenewable. Provisions of the Employment and Dismissal Act do not apply.) Induction 25

Induction 26

INDUCTION (Successful Transition) ASSISTANCE (Transitional Support) EVALUATION (Formative Feedback) DEVELOPMENT (Skill Acquisition/Refinement) 27

Induction Comprehensive orientation Trained assistance team (building administrator and LMS mentor) Regular opportunities to observe and consult with experienced LMSs 28

Induction Regular opportunities to receive feedback from and to consult with assistance team members. Regular opportunities to meet with other new professional staff members. 29

Year 2 (+) Teaching Certificate License issued by the State Department of Education. Initial Certificate Contract Employment agreement issued by the local school district. ADEPT Process Annual Up to four years. Provisions of the Employment and Dismissal Act do not apply; teacher may request ti informal lh hearings. Formal Evaluation OR Diagnostic Assistance 30

Formal Evaluation 31

FORMAL EVALUATION (Quality Assurance) PACT for LMSs EVALUATION (Summative) DEVELOPMENT (Remediation of deficiencies) ASSISTANCE (Remedial support) 32

Formal Evaluation Materials Available online at http://www.scteachers.org Include Guidelines Evidence Documentation Interview Form Reflection Professional Performance Description Professional Self-Report Evaluation Summary 33

FORMAL EVALUATION Must address the seven performance dimensions (PDs) for library media specialists. Must provide clear, convincing evidence of typical performance relative to each PD. 34

Typical Performance Rationale: Typical performance is the best overall indicator of an LMS s knowledge, skills, and dispositions. Judgments about typical performance must be based on evidence obtained from multiple l evaluators, multiple sources, multiple samples over time, and unannounced, as opposed to showcase, samples. 35

Evaluation Teams Each evaluation team must include a minimum of two members. All evaluation team members must be certified ADEPT evaluators. All evaluation team members must have successfully completed training in the ADEPT for Library Media Specialists evaluation process. 36

Evaluation Teams At least one member of the evaluation team must be a certified library media specialist. At least one member of the evaluation team must be qualified to serve as a district- or school-level level supervisor for library media specialists. 37

Expert Evaluator Expert someone who, through education or experience, has gained knowledge of a particular subject so that he or she could form an opinion that one without that knowledge could not. 38

Orientation Each library media specialist who is scheduled for formal evaluation must receive a comprehensive orientation prior to the initiation of the evaluation process. The orientation must include, but need not be limited to, written and oral explanations of the performance dimensions, the evaluation process, the criteria i for successfully completing the evaluation, and the intended use of the evaluation results. 39

Formal Evaluation At-A-Glance 40

Formal Evaluation Process LMS Evaluator 1 Evaluator 2 Administrator (Supervisor) (LMS) R i Review th the Complete the LRP; complete the LRP documenta-documenta (PD 1) tion (PD 1) R i Review th the LRP; complete the documenta-documenta tion (PD 1) 41

Formal Evaluation Process LMS Evaluator 1 Evaluator 2 Administrator (Supervisor) (LMS) Conduct the Participate in interview; complete the interviews documenta-(pd 2 (PDs 2, 4 4, 5 5, documenta and 6) tion (PDs 2, 4,, 5,, and 6)) Conduct the interview; complete the documenta-documenta tion (PDs 2, 4,, 5,, and 6)) 42

Formal Evaluation Process LMS Complete a written Reflection Reflection following each observation (PD 3) Evaluator 1 Evaluator 2 Administrator (Supervisor) (LMS) Conduct the observation Conduct the observation Re ie the Review Reflection Re ie the Review Reflection Complete the Complete the documenta-- documenta documenta documenta-tion (PD 3) tion (PD 3) 43

Formal Evaluation Process LMS C l t th Complete the Professional p Self--Report Self (PD 7) Evaluator 1 Evaluator 2 Administrator (Supervisor) (LMS) Review the Professional Self--Report Self Review the Professional Self--Report Self Review the Professional Performance Description; complete the documenta-documenta tion (PD 7) Review the Professional Performance Description; complete the documenta-documenta tion (PD 7) Complete the Professional Performance Description (PD 7) 44

Formal Evaluation Process LMS Evaluator 1 Evaluator 2 (LMS) (Supervisor) Hold the consensus meeting; complete the consensus documentation and the Evaluation Summary Administrator 45

Formal Evaluation Process LMS Evaluator 1 Evaluator 2 (LMS) (Supervisor) Administrator Participate in the evaluation conference to discuss the evaluation results 46

Evaluation Judgments Consensus-based for each PD Issued twice during the year Preliminary judgment prior to Winter holiday break to provide feedback (i.e., a progress report) to the library media specialist Final judgment prior to April 15 47

Evaluation Judgments In order to meet the overall competency standard, the library media specialist must meet the standard on PD 3 (Collaboration for Instruction and Services) and on at least five of the six remaining performance dimensions at the time of the final evaluation. 48

EVALUATION CONFERENCES Conducted twice per year, following each consensus meeting. Evaluation team meets with the library media specialist to discuss the LMS s performance relative to each PD, and The overall evaluation judgment. 49

EVALUATION CONFERENCES The LMS must receive written copies of the consensus evidence documentation for each PD and the completed Evaluation Summary form. If the LMS does not meet the overall standard at the time of the preliminary evaluation conference, the evaluation team must provide an assistance plan. 50

Diagnostic Assistance 51

Diagnostic Assistance Provided if needed at the annual contract level. One year only. For LMSs who show potential but who are not ready for formal evaluation. May be provided either after the induction year or after the first unsuccessful formal evaluation. 52

Diagnostic Assistance Interim Guidelines Assistance team (mentor and supervisor). Assistance plan, based on area(s) that need improvement. Observations by and formative oral and written feedback from assistance team. Other types of assistance, as needed. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the diagnostic assistance. 53

All Requirements Met Teaching Certificate License issued by the State Department of Education. Contract Employment p y agreement issued by the local school district. ADEPT Process Professional Certificate Continuing Full provisions of the Employment and Dismissal Act apply. Informal Evaluation (GBE) OR Formal Evaluation 54

Informal Evaluation Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE) 55

INFORMAL EVALUATION (GBE) (Continuous Quality Improvement) DEVELOPMENT (Skill advancement) ASSISTANCE (Contributions to others and to the profession) EVALUATION (Formative self-analysis) 56

GBE For successful LMSs at the continuing contract level Goals must relate to the performance dimensions for LMSs and the overall mission and strategic plan for the school and district. 57

The GBE Process Identify the need Articulate the goal (i.e., the vision) Develop the action plan Determine the requirements Professional development Resources Identify the appropriate evidence for measuring progress. Establish ways for determining success success. 58

Professional Growth Action research Mentoring Peer coaching Self-Directed Professional Growth National Board Certification 59

For additional information, contact Kathryn R. Meeks, Ph.D. Office of Teacher Preparation, Support, and Evaluation Division of Teacher Quality South Carolina Department t of Education 3700 Forest Drive, Suite 500 Columbia, South Carolina 29204 Telephone: (803) 734-40674067 Facsimile: (803) 734-0872 E-Mail: kmeeks@scteachers.org 60