Sludge Treatment Facility Stack Gas Monitoring Report February 2016

Similar documents
Examination syllabuses for Manual Stack emissions monitoring. Environment Agency Version 9 January 2015

Marsa Thermal Treatment Facility Yearly Emissions Statement

GUIDELINES FOR PROCESSING AND USING REFUSE DERIVED FUEL (RDF) IN CEMENT INDUSTRY

Sludge Treatment Facilities

Electronic Reporting to BTS

Iron and Steel Manufacturing

Alternative fuels in cement manufacturing

Guidance and Reporting Instructions on Temporary E-reporting for the MATS Rule

Holcim EMR List of EN Standards and VDI Guidelines usable for Discontinuous Measurements in Cement Plants

Revealing the costs of air pollution from industrial facilities in Europe a summary for policymakers

A GUIDANCE NOTE ON THE BEST PRACTICABLE MEANS FOR ELECTRICITY WORKS BPM 7/1 (2014)

Rapid Thermophilic Digestion Technology

Emission Monitoring and Reporting (EMR) Manual for European Countries

Policy on Monitoring of Stack Emissions to Air at EPA Licensed Sites

The laboratory fulfils the requirements for periodic emission measurement according to ČSN P CEN/TS 15675:2009

Official Journal of the European Communities

M.Sc. Matti Kivelä Power Plant Manager R&D Lahti Energia Oy P.O. Box 93 FIN Lahti Finland Tel matti.kivela@lahtienergia.

Costs of air pollution from European industrial facilities an updated assessment

2) Relevance for environmental policy ) Data sources and reporting ) References at the international level... 6

As of: September Waste Incineration A Potential Danger? Bidding Farewell to Dioxin Spouting

How To Run A Power Plant In Celje

Treatment and Disposal Technologies for Medical Wastes in Developing Countries

Welcome to NOAH and Langøya!

The ECN Concept for Quality Assurance of Compost

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Page 1 Chapter Control of Air Pollution from Nitrogen Compounds

Monitoring of Total Suspended Particles & Toxic Gasses in Stationary Combustion Systems

Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (Cap. 499) Environmental Impact Assessment Report Sludge Treatment Facilities

Nu G Medical Waste System Technology (Pyrolysis / Thermal Decomposition)

INCINERATION IN JAPAN

Ambient Air Monitoring at Deployment Locations in the Middle East

BEST AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES REFERENCE DOCUMENT ON WASTE INCINERATOR BEST AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON WASTE INCINERATOR

IT3 01 Conference, Philadelphia, PA, May 14-18, 2001

IMPLEMENTING ISO 14001:

Chemical Engineer Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

Wolverine Clean Energy Venture

Sampling and preparation of heterogeneous waste fuels?

Material and methods. Värmeforsk report Niklas Hansson DIANAS utilization of waste inciniration bottom ash in bound construction materials

Emissions estimate from forest fires: methodology, software and European case studies

Technical Guidance Note (Monitoring)

SLMA Meeting. Boiler MACT and Related Rules. Atlanta, GA March 2, Martin Rollins, P. E. H. M. Rollins Company, Inc. Gulfport, Mississippi

Digestate treatment in Sweden and Germany Applied technologies and technologies under research

Mercury Speciation in Flue Gas from Coal-fired Power Stations

INDUSTRIAL BOILER MACT FACTSHEET

Manual stack emission monitoring Performance standard for organisations. Environment Agency November 2011 Version 7.2

TEST REPORT Job No./Report No TR Date:12 June 2014 Page 1 of 5

Healthcare Waste Management Training

Monitoring of Exhaust Gas Parameters of Stationary Combustion Systems In View of Environmental Standards

Terms Used in the following Tables 1 3

It s time for H.E.R.O. Energy Saving Strategy for. Tunnel & Shuttle Kilns

Waste to Energy in Düsseldorf. for a clean city.

of 11,000 households Steam temperature, boiler 400 C Steam pressure, boiler Incineration temperature 1,100 C

Environmental Technology March/April 1998

Pollution and health impacts of waste incinerators

Oxygen Give and Take. Correlation to National Science Education Standards

Assessing the Changes Required by the Industrial Boiler MACT Regulations

City of Mebane Wastewater Collection and Treatment Facility

This document contains important information and must be read in its entirety. Edition: Previous Edition: /4

Gasification of Sludge and Biosolids A Review of Technology Fundamentals and the Current Commercial Status

HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATION:

47374_04_p25-32.qxd 2/9/07 7:50 AM Page Atoms and Elements

Jytte Boll Illerup Morten Winther Erik Lyck Henrik Gundorph Bruun Department of Policy Analysis

Hackney Biomass Boiler Information Request Form

Scientific and analytical consultancy services for industry

Cement, Lime and Magnesium Oxide Manufacturing Industries

Advanced Solutions for Gas Monitoring

FACT SHEET. Recent Developments in Clinical Waste Treatment Technologies

Plasma Arc Technology

FACT SHEET PROPOSED MERCURY AND AIR TOXICS STANDARDS

WASTES INCINERATION PLANTS

Thermal & Biogas Production In Egypt. By Prof. Dr. Ahmed Abd El-Ati Ahmed Egypt - GBEP Focal Point

1-Some related indicators: Total land area is 1 million Km 2. Only 3% of the land area is arable. The rest 97% is hyper arid desert. The whole lands a

Emission Testing February 2015 LMS Energy Pty Ltd - Jilliby Plant

PHARMACEUTICAL AND CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT

Developments and trends shaping the future for Waste-to- Energy technology suppliers

Avoiding co-product allocation in a simplified hypothetical refinery 1

Technique of Monitoring Dioxins in Flue Gas from MSW Incinerators using Dioxin Precursor Analyzer

ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS FOR PETROLEUM OIL REFINERIES EMISSIONS. Standards for emissions from furnaces, boilers and Power Plant

POTENTIAL TO EMIT SUMMARY FIBERIGHT, LLC HAMPDEN, MAINE

Quality requirements and quality assurance of digestion residuals in Germany

Secondary Lead Smelting

Perspectives and limits for cement kilns as a destination for RDF

Development of Advanced Wastewater Treatment and Reclamation System

A COST EFFECTIVE SOLUTION TO MANAGING BIOHAZARD WASTE

ASME QRO Certification Program

Issues/Concerns With Ambient Air Monitoring

New Bio Solutions. DONG Energy. Pyroneer November May 2013

VENTURA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 669 County Square Drive, Ventura CA / FAX 805/

Industry Description and Practices. Waste Characteristics

Half the cost Half the carbon

Fuld Skolerapport for Søhusskolen, i Odense kommune, for skoleår 2013/2014 for klassetrin(ene) 9. med reference Tilsvarende klassetrin i kommunen

Fuld Skolerapport for Hunderupskolen, i Odense kommune, for skoleår 2013/2014 for klassetrin(ene) 7. med reference Tilsvarende klassetrin i kommunen

Transcription:

I. INTRODUCTION This Monthly Report aims to provide a summary of environmental performance of the Sludge Treatment Facility (STF) over the monitoring period, which includes the air emission data collected by a Continuous Emission Monitoring System (CEMS), and the periodic monitoring of heavy metals, dioxins and furans. II. THE ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING RESULTS The STF is required to undertake regular checks on the air emission during the operation of the plant. There are four incineration trains, namely, Train AF, Train AE, Train BF and Train BE in the STF. Air emissions from the incineration trains under operation are closely monitored through a comprehensive management and monitoring programme to ensure that the plant is being operated safely and in an environmentally acceptable manner. The CEMS on key parameters is installed in each incineration train to ensure combustion and air pollutant removal processes are functionally well. Furthermore, each incineration train is equipped with an automatic waste feed cut-off system. In the event that the CEMS picks up any potential sign of exceedance of any of the control parameters, waste feed to the incineration train will be stopped automatically. In, three incineration trains AE, AF and BF were in operation. For stack gas monitoring, emission rate of the key parameters are summarized in the tables below. All emission records and test results by the respective accredited laboratories have been checked and certified by the Consultants before publication. In the initial operation period, the STF was under fine-tuning to maintain stable and continuous operation. The results of stack gas monitoring are in compliance with all stack gas control parameters with respect to the mass emission limit.

Stack AE Parameters Emission Limits (i) Range Mean (a) Continuous Monitoring Hourly Average (Measurement by CEMS) Particulates (ii) 2.277 0.00 0.34 0.00 Y Total organic carbon 1.512 0.00 0.81 0.04 Y 4.545 0.02 0.59 0.17 Y 0.306 0.01 0.18 0.04 Y 15.147 0.00 4.36 1.95 Y 7.578 0.00 0.89 0.04 Y 30.303 1.17 9.52 3.04 Y (b) Continuous Monitoring Daily Average (Measurement by CEMS) Particulates (ii) 0.756 0.00 0.02 0.00 Y Total organic carbon 0.756 0.01 0.17 0.04 Y 0.756 0.11 0.25 0.17 Y 0.072 0.03 0.05 0.04 Y 3.789 1.48 2.77 1.95 Y 3.789 0.02 0.06 0.04 Y 15.147 2.01 4.71 3.04 Y

Parameters Emission Limits (i) Result (c) Monthly Monitoring (Measurement by accredited laboratory) Mercury 0.003789 <0.0003 Y Total Cadmium & Thallium 0.003789 <0.0012 Y Total Heavy Metals (iii) 0.0378 <0.0053 Y Dioxins and Furans (ng I-TEQ/m 3 ) (iv) 7.575 x 10-9 <6.261 x 10-10 Y

Stack AF Parameters Emission Limits (i) Range Mean (a) Continuous Monitoring Hourly Average (Measurement by CEMS) Particulates (ii) 2.277 0.00 0.49 0.01 Y Total organic carbon 1.512 0.00 2.02 0.05 Y 4.545 0.04 0.69 0.20 Y 0.306 0.00 0.17 0.04 Y 15.147 0.02 4.69 1.68 Y 7.578 0.00 0.32 0.00 Y 30.303 0.27 10.21 2.93 Y (b) Continuous Monitoring Daily Average (Measurement by CEMS) Particulates (ii) 0.756 0.00 0.08 0.01 Y Total organic carbon 0.756 0.00 0.27 0.05 Y 0.756 0.14 0.34 0.20 Y 0.072 0.02 0.05 0.04 Y 3.789 1.27 2.53 1.68 Y 3.789 0.00 0.02 0.00 Y 15.147 1.48 6.35 2.94 Y

Parameters Emission Limits (i) Result (c) Monthly Monitoring (Measurement by accredited laboratory) Mercury 0.003789 <0.0003 Y Total Cadmium & Thallium 0.003789 <0.0011 Y Total Heavy Metals (iii) 0.0378 <0.0049 Y Dioxins and Furans (ng I-TEQ/m 3 ) (iv) 7.575 x 10-9 <5.386 x 10-10 Y

Stack BF Parameters Emission Limits (i) Range Mean (a) Continuous Monitoring Hourly Average (Measurement by CEMS) Particulates (ii) 2.277 0.00 0.11 0.00 Y Total organic carbon 1.512 0.00 0.86 0.04 Y 4.545 0.03 0.25 0.11 Y 0.306 0.01 0.07 0.03 Y 15.147 0.01 2.92 1.17 Y 7.578 0.00 0.03 0.01 Y 30.303 0.55 4.40 1.21 Y (b) Continuous Monitoring Daily Average (Measurement by CEMS) Particulates (ii) 0.756 0.00 0.01 0.00 Y Total organic carbon 0.756 0.00 0.17 0.04 Y 0.756 0.08 0.15 0.11 Y 0.072 0.02 0.04 0.03 Y 3.789 0.89 1.65 1.17 Y 3.789 0.00 0.02 0.01 Y 15.147 0.82 2.06 1.21 Y

Parameters Emission Limits (i) Result (c) Monthly Monitoring (Measurement by accredited laboratory) Mercury 0.003789 <0.0003 Y Total Cadmium & Thallium 0.003789 <0.0012 Y Total Heavy Metals (iii) 0.0378 <0.0053 Y Dioxins and Furans (ng I-TEQ/m 3 ) (iv) 7.575 x 10-9 <5.952 x 10-10 Y

Explanatory Notes (i) The results of measurements are standardized at the reference conditions of 0 o C temperature, 101.325 kpa pressure, dry and 11% oxygen content conditions. (ii) The particulates mean the respirable suspended particulates, which are suspended particulates in air with a nominal aerodynamic diameter of 10 µm or smaller. (iii) Average values over a sampling period of a minimum of 30 minutes and a maximum of 8 hours, including Sb, As, Pb, Co, Cr, Cu, Mn, V and Ni. (iv) Average values over a sampling period of 6 to 8 hours, expressed in the unit of Internal Toxic Equivalent (I-TEQ).