Bismarck, Beveridge and The Blues The Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies Bologna, Italy October 14, 2010 Lloyd B. Minor, M.D. Provost and Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs University Distinguished Service Professor of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery The Johns Hopkins University
Bi-Polar Public Opinion? Since the 1990s, large majorities of Americans have stated that the health care system is broken and needs major reform On average, 70% of Americans are pleased with the health care they receive and with their health care plan
Mortality Amenable to Health Care A measure of health system performance 150 100 76 81 Preventable deaths per 100,000 population* 1997/98 2002/03 109 106 99 97 97 88 89 89 88 84 116 115 113 130 134 128 115 50 65 71 71 74 74 77 80 82 82 84 84 90 93 96 101 103 103 104 110 0 *Countries age-standardized death rates before age 75; including ischemic heart disease, diabetes, stroke and bacterial infections Data: E. Nolte and C. M. McKee, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine analysis of WHO mortality files (2008) Source: Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2008
Infant Mortality Rates Infant deaths per 1,000 live births 6.8 International Comparison, 2004 5.3 4.4 2.8 2.8 3.1 3.2 3.3 Japan Iceland Sweden Norway Finland Denmark Canada U.S. Data: OECD Health Data 2007, Version 10/2007 Source: Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2008
Health Care Rankings by Country Best Middle Worst AUS CAN GER NETH NZ UK US OVERALL RANKING (2010) 3 6 4 1 5 2 7 Quality Care 4 7 5 2 1 3 6 Effective Care 2 7 6 3 5 1 4 Safe Care 6 5 3 1 4 2 7 Coordinated Care 4 5 7 2 1 3 6 Patient-Centered Care 2 5 3 6 1 7 4 Access 6.5 5 3 1 4 2 6.5 Cost-Related Problem 6 3.5 3.5 2 5 1 7 Timeliness of Care 6 7 2 1 3 4 5 Efficiency 2 6 5 3 4 1 7 Equity 4 5 3 1 6 2 7 Long, Healthy, Productive Lives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Health Expenditures/Capita, 2007 $3,357 $3,895 $3,588 $3,837* $2,454 $2,992 $7,290 Notes: *Estimate; expenditures shown in $US PPP (purchasing power parity) Source: Calculated by The Commonwealth Fund based on 2007 International Health Policy Survey; 2008 International Health Policy Survey of Sicker Adults; 2009 International Health Policy Survey of Primary Care Physicians; Commonwealth Fund Commission on a High Performance Health System National Scorecard; and OECD Health Data, 2009 (Nov. 2009)
International Comparison of Health Spending 1980 2007 Average Health Expenditures per capita ($US PPP) 16 Total Health Expenditures as % of GDP 16% $7,290 14 12 10 8 8% $2,454 6 United States Germany 4 Canada Netherlands New Zealand 2 Australia United Kingdom 0 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 Note: $US PPP = purchasing power parity Source: OECD Health Data, 2009 (Nov. 2009)
Projected Spending on Health Care Under Assumption that Cost Growth Continues at Historical Averages Percent of GDP Source: Congressional Budget Office, testimony of Peter R. Orszag, Growth in Health Care Costs before the Committee on the Budget, United States Senate, January 31, 2008
Affordable Care Act Largest expansion of private sector health insurance in U.S. history Federal subsidies for those without employer coverage Tax credits for small businesses Private insurance market reform Eliminate rescission and most other forms of underwriting Required medical loss ratios 85% for plans in large group market 80% for plans in individual and small group markets Compete on quality, service, outcomes, price
Affordable Care Act Insurance exchanges More efficiently pool risk Lower administrative costs Provide a choice of health plans to eligible individuals and small businesses Significantly expanded Medicaid eligibility to capture 16 million uninsured Large role for the states via both Medicaid and new insurance exchanges
Affordable Care Act Goal: To cover all citizens Reality: Reduction of number of uninsured from over 50 million in 2007 to estimated 23 million in 2019 Uninsured will be mostly illegal aliens and those who fail or refuse to enroll in insurance plan Insurance mandate
Health System Models Bismarck (decentralized) Established end of 19th century by Bismarck in newly-unified Germany Patients pay insurance premiums to a sick fund Local/regional social insurance model Beveridge (centralized) Established in 1948 by Lord Beveridge in the UK as the National Health Service (NHS) State owns and runs hospitals Funded through general taxation Market-Based
Nations with Bismarck Model Social Insurance Current Austria Germany The Netherlands Belgium France Switzerland Luxembourg Japan Moved from Bismark to Beveridge in 1970-80s Greece Italy Portugal Spain South Korea
Nations with Beveridge Model National Health System (NHS) Long-Standing UK Ireland Denmark Norway Sweden Finland Iceland Australia New Zealand Moved from Bismark to Beveridge in 1970-80s Greece Italy Portugal Spain South Korea
Public Policy Conundrum Outcomes vs. Popularity Outcomes Bismarck has higher rates of per capita growth in health expenditures Beveridge has a cost advantage Beveridge has a possible advantage in health outcomes related to diseases requiring systematic, organized population-based screening (e.g., breast cancer, TB) Popularity Satisfaction in decentralized Bismarck systems generally higher than in centralized Beveridge systems
Marked-Based Models American Blue Cross and Blue Shield model Established in 1934 Private insurance and provider markets Access depends on ability to pay Provisions for the poorest and most vulnerable Other nations with market-based models South Africa Uruguay The Bahamas Chile Argentina
True Blues The rest of the developed world has Bismarck and Beveridge America has The Blues U.S. health care reform represents the firstever attempt at universal health care on the foundation of a market-based model
Borrowing Among the Models Course of reform is never straight The Blues Borrow from Beveridge in the VA Health System Borrow from Bismarck in Medicaid and federally-sponsored community health centers Beveridge models have long experimented with managed competition
The Challenge of Bending the Cost Curve Around the world, cost pressures have driven reform In the United States, health expenditures as a share of GDP have risen dramatically: $7,681 $7,423 $7,071 $6,701 $6,327 $5,973 $5,564 $5,150 $4,789 $4,295 $4,522 $2,814 $1,100 $148 $356 1960 5.2% 1970 7.2% 1980 9.1% 1990 12.3% 1998 13.5% 1999 13.5% 2000 13.6% 2001 14.3% 2002 15.1% 2003 15.6% 2004 15.6% 2005 15.7% 2006 15.8% 2007 15.9% 2008 16.2% Source: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary, National Health Statistics Group; U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis; and U.S. Bureau of the Census
National Health Expenditures, 2008 $2.3 Trillion Govt Public Health Activities 3% Other Retail Products 3% Program Admin 7% Investment 7% Home Health 3% Rx Drugs 10% Nursing Home Care 6% Hospital Care 30% Dental 4% Other Professional Services 6% Physician/Clincial Services 21% Source: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary, National Health Statistics Group
Accountable Care Organizations Mode of Payment Savings Incentives Risk Tier 1 Fee-for-service Low Low Tier 2 Fee-for-service, partial capitation, some bundled payments Medium Medium Tier 3 Full or partial capitation, extensive bundled payments High High Health Policy Brief: Accountable Care Organizations. Health Affairs, July 27, 2010, http://www.healthaffairs.org/healthpolicybriefs/
Models of Accountable Care Organizations Integrated Delivery System Multispecialty Group Practice Physician-Hospital Organization Independent Practice Association Virtual Physician Organization Organization of physician practices, hospitals, and health plan, like Kaiser Permanente Affiliation of physicians from multiple specialties, like Mayo Clinic Joint venture between one or more hospitals and a group of physicians Organization of individual physician practices that contract with health plans Organization of small, independent physician practices, many located in rural areas Health Policy Brief: Accountable Care Organizations. Health Affairs, July 27, 2010, http://www.healthaffairs.org/healthpolicybriefs/
Health and Social Service Expenditures OECD Countries, 2005 Expenditures as % of GDP *Expenditures for Portugal are from 2004 due to missing data for 2005 Source: OECD Health Data 2009 (Accessed June 2009); OECD Social Expenditure Dataset (Accessed Dec. 2009); Health and Social Service Spending; Associations with Health Outcomes by Elizabeth Bradley, Benjamin Elkins, Brian Elbel
Determinants of Health Genetics 5% Medical Care 20% Environmental and Societal Factors 55% Behavioral Factors 20% Source: Sowad, Barbara J. A call to be whole: the fundamentals of health care reform, CT. 53
Infant Mortality Rates Infant deaths per 1,000 live births National Average and State Distribution 10.3 11.1 10.2 9.9 9.9 9.6 10.1 7.2 7 6.9 6.8 7 6.8 6.8 5.3 5.1 5 4.9 4.8 4.7 4.7 U.S. Average Bottom 10% States Top 10% States 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002* 2003 2004 *Denotes baseline year Data: National Vital Statistics System, Linked Birth and Infant Death Data (AHRQ 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007a) Source: Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2008
America s Got The Blues The Blues is life. Brownie McGhee It is from the blues that all that may be called American music [and health care?] derives its most distinctive characteristics James Weldon Johnson