CONTACT US TECHNICAL SUMMARIES: CONXL AISC PRE-QUALIFIED CONNECTION SMF CONNECTION



Similar documents
CE591 Fall 2013 Lecture 26: Moment Connections

A DESIGN PROCEDURE FOR BOLTED TOP-AND-SEAT ANGLE CONNECTIONS FOR USE IN SEISMIC APPLICATIONS

Progressive Collapse Analysis and Design Guidelines

Seismic Design of Steel Special Moment Frames:

Design Parameters for Steel Special Moment Frame Connections

BEHAVIOR OF WELDED T-STUBS SUBJECTED TO TENSILE LOADS

Facilities Development Division. The Building Department for California s Hospitals

Security Risk Assessment and Mitigation Prioritization

MODULE E: BEAM-COLUMNS

COLORADO MODEL. 35 x 65 SPECIFICATIONS

DENVER MODEL 30 X 30 SPECIFICATIONS

Contractor s Statement of Responsibility for Seismic-Force-Resisting Systems This form is to be filled out by the contractor.

ENGINEER S DESIGN GUIDELINES

Prepared For San Francisco Community College District 33 Gough Street San Francisco, California Prepared By

Hybrid simulation evaluation of the suspended zipper braced frame

DESIGN OF BLAST RESISTANT BUILDINGS IN AN LNG PROCESSING PLANT

National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying. Principles and Practice of Engineering Structural Examination

SECTION 5 ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS SPANS DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: BRYAN ALLRED

4B The stiffness of the floor and roof diaphragms. 3. The relative flexural and shear stiffness of the shear walls and of connections.

ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL DESIGN FOR BLAST RESISTANT BUILDINGS

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. Fig some of the trusses that are used in steel bridges

CSA S16-09 Design of Steel Structures Canada

Reinforced Concrete Design

HOW TO EVALUATE BUILDINGS AND DETERMINE RETROFIT COSTS

Steel joists and joist girders are

Cover. When to Specify Intermediate Precast Concrete Shear Walls Rev 4. White Paper WP004

Seismic Data Requirements for Eaton UPS Equipment Installation

CONX MODULAR PIPE RACK

Type of Force 1 Axial (tension / compression) Shear. 3 Bending 4 Torsion 5 Images 6 Symbol (+ -)

ETABS. Integrated Building Design Software. Concrete Shear Wall Design Manual. Computers and Structures, Inc. Berkeley, California, USA

Requirements for the Use of PRESSS Moment-Resisting Frame Systems

Design of Lateral Load Resisting Frames Using Steel Joists and Joist Girders

Performance On Innovative Mechanical Connections In Precast Building Structures Under Seismic Conditions. 1º Year Meeting

STEEL. the parking structure prototype iii. structural. Exploring Conventional Composite and Castellated Composite Framing Options

SPECIFICATIONS, LOADS, AND METHODS OF DESIGN

TECHNICAL NOTE. Design of Diagonal Strap Bracing Lateral Force Resisting Systems for the 2006 IBC. On Cold-Formed Steel Construction INTRODUCTION

What is Seismic Retrofitting?

Chapter 3 - Structural Design

Impact of Katrina on U.S. Housing Markets: Building Codes Change in Response to Catastrophic Risk

Current Status of Seismic Retrofitting Technology

Hunter College school of Social Work Thesis Proposal

Quality and the Bridge Engineer

4A6(1) Case Study Hartford Arena Roof Collapse Group 11. 4A6(1) Case Study. Group 11: Hartford Arena Roof Collapse

ModuSec. Secure and efficient IT room solutions. Turnkey Modular Construction Fast clean build to any size or shape

SEISMIC EVALUATION OF HOSPITAL PIPING SYSTEMS

! # # % % & () +, & +,,. / 0 % % ) () 3

ATLANTA MODEL SPECIFICATIONS

Comparison of Seismic Performance of D-region of Existing RC Structures Designed with Different Recommendations

QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FIRMS

DS/EN DK NA:2014

Concrete Frame Design Manual

Designing a Structural Steel Beam. Kristen M. Lechner

Miss S. S. Nibhorkar 1 1 M. E (Structure) Scholar,

Analytical Tools for Progressive Collapse Analysis Robert Smilowitz Weidlinger Associates

BUILDING DESIGN FOR HOMELAND SECURITY. Unit I Building Design for Homeland Security

research report Residential Hip Roof Framing Using Cold-Formed Steel Members RESEARCH REPORT RP06-2 American Iron and Steel Institute

ETABS. Integrated Building Design Software. Concrete Frame Design Manual. Computers and Structures, Inc. Berkeley, California, USA

ISSUE BRIEF. Understanding the Hospital Planning, Design, and Construction Process. Introduction. Background. Phase 1: Project Definition and Planning

Key Considerations for Selecting Server Cabinets for Seismic Areas

INTERIM GUIDELINES: Evaluation, Repair, Modification and Design of Steel Moment Frames

metal Duil~ing manufacturers Association

Discipline: Structural Issued

LINKED COLUMN FRAME STEEL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE VALIDATION USING HYBRID SIMULATION

Joist Models in Standard Structural Software

1997 Uniform Administrative Code Amendment for Earthen Material and Straw Bale Structures Tucson/Pima County, Arizona

Explosive Engineering as an Academic Program

Building Code of New York State

Statics of Structural Supports

Perforated Shearwall Design Method 1

Two-Year Post-Professional Degree (Path A) MASTERS OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN & URBANISM (MADU) With a Concentration in Classical Architecture

Review of Design Code Experiences in Conversion from ASD Methodology to LRFD Methodology

STEEL. the healthcare structure PrototyPe ii. structural. Exploring Castellated Composite Framing. Your connection to i e n er

How To Get A Power Station To Work With A Power Generator Without A Substation

Bolting: Attachment Of The Mudsill To The Foundation

Five reasons buildings fail in an earthquake and how to avoid them

DESIGN DRIFT REQUIREMENTS FOR LONG-PERIOD STRUCTURES

Guernsey s Structural Engineering Experience

INTRODUCTION TO LIMIT STATES

D1.8 Seismic Supplement Welding Manual. A General Overview of AWS D1.8 Welding Code - Seismic Supplement

Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority. Re Invitation of applications for Prequalification of Structural Peer Reviewers

PROJECT SUMMARY. Scope of work details: (If phased construction, please see plan submittal guidelines.)

Redundant and Robust Structures by Joint Ductility

Loads and Load Combinations for NBCC. Outline

A Case Study Comparing Two Approaches for Applying Area Loads: Tributary Area Loads vs Shell Pressure Loads

ARCHITECTURE. Asst. Prof. Meltem VATAN KAPTAN

SEISMIC DESIGN. Various building codes consider the following categories for the analysis and design for earthquake loading:

Transcription:

CONXL AISC PRE-QUALIFIED CONNECTION ConXtech s ConXL connection has been through a rigorous qualification review process conducted by the AISC 358 - Connection Pre-qualification Review Panel (CPRP). ConXL was approved through this process and has been incorporated as Chapter 10 in the 2010 AISC 358 code book, Pre-qualified Connections for Special and Intermediate Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Applications. ConXtech completed six successful tests of its moment connection for the CPRP under the unprecedented bi-axial test protocol which subjected the ConXL connection to the typical Seismic Provisions cyclic loading while simultaneously subjecting the connection to a constant orthogonal load equal to 100% of the probable maximum moment (Mpr) of the primary beams. No other steel framing connection has been subjected to this type of loading as the ConXtech connections are the only standard bi-axial steel moment connections in the market today. SMF CONNECTION AISC s CPRP reviews connection test data and pre-qualifies connections in accordance with the AISC Seismic Provisions. The connections that gain approval of the AISC CPRP reviews are considered a prequalified connection standard. A moment connection pre-qualified by the AISC CPRP provides the most recognized and direct method of satisfying the Seismic Provision s conformance demonstration requirements for SMF and IMF connections and simplifies the project approval process for this class of buildings.

BI-AXIAL TEST FRAME ConXtech s unique Bi-Axial Test Frame was developed to satisfy the conformance demonstration requirements for a bi-axial SMF connection that may be required for pre-qualification in any jurisdiction. The ConX moment connection is the only standard bi-axial connection that exists in the steel framing market today and due to its unique characteristics, a new testing protocol was developed and approved by the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD). These new conformance requirements are unprecedented with testing conditions no other steel moment connection has ever been subjected to. ConXtech s Bi-Axial Test Frame is unique in its capability of cyclically testing (in the primary direction) a single column and two moment beams, up to a W36x262, while simultaneously imposing an orthogonal load across secondary moment beams equivalent to the primary beams probable maximum moment (Mpr). The self-equilibrating frame has the capacity of imposing, along the primary axis, a 1,000 kip load at the top of column while resisting 700 kip reactions at beam ends; and along the secondary axis, impose 700 kip loads at beam ends while resisting a 1,000 kip reaction at top of column.

CONXL OSHPD APPROVAL PROCESS The ConXL connection is qualified as a Special Moment Frame connection for use in hospital environments with the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD). OSHPD observed the successful completion of three full scale bi-axial tests, which met OSHPD s test protocol designed specifically for ConXtech s connection. ConXtech also completed 3 additional tests following this protocol for AISC CPRP qualification. This qualification is unique as no other steel moment frame has undergone cyclic testing while simultaneously being subjected to a constant orthogonal load equal to 100% of the probable maximum moment (Mpr) of the primary beams. This unprecedented bi-axial testing proved the unique capabilities of the ConXtech moment connection, the only standardized true bi-axial moment connection in the steel framing market today.

CONXTECH TEST FRAMES Bi-Axial Test frame Single Axis Test frame ConXtech has two in-house test frames capable of qualifying cyclic tests of beam-to-column connections per the Seismic Provisions. ConXtech s bi-axial test frame is capable of qualifying cyclic testing about the primary axis, while simultaneously imposing an orthogonal load across the secondary axis. ConXtech s single axis test frame can test moment beams up to a W30x99, while its bi-axial test frame can test up to a W36x262. These test frames provide ConXtech with unparalleled access to efficient and cost effective testing for project specific requirements.

RESISTANCE TO PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE The terrorist attacks of 1995 (Murrah Federal Building) and 2001 (World Trade Center) focused attention on structural design requirements to prevent the catastrophic damage caused by these events. However, creating practical design requirements for such severe loading proved to be an extremely difficult task. Because prescriptive and performance requirements for blast and progressive collapse mitigation do not appear in the design codes, they are not codified into law. The owner, architect and structural engineer are the key stakeholders who carry the responsibility in deciding if the need for blast and progressive collapse resistance is necessary. Generally prescriptive design procedures for blast and progressive collapse resistance result in inefficient costly construction and limitations on the architectural design of such buildings thus are rarely implemented on a project that doesn t have GSA, DoD or State Department requirements. In 2004, Ronald Hamburger of Simpson Gumpertz & Heger wrote an article (1) discussing the high costs and architectural limitations of current prescriptive design methods. He felt there was a much more cost effective performance based design method, but the industry needed a program of research and development similar to that conducted after the 1994 earthquake to determine the types of connection technologies that can be effective in resisting progressive collapse so that less conservative but more reliable approaches to blast-resistant design can be adopted by the community. ConXtech s ConXR framing connection debuted in 2004 and the ConXL connection in 2008. With the ConX System, the key stakeholders now have the option of specifying a structural framing system that will carry gravity, wind and seismic loading and also provide resistance to blast and progressive collapse, all in one efficient structural framing system. The innovative and highly robust ConX framing system provides a cost effective and easily configurable biaxial moment frame connection that also provides blast and progressive collapse resistance. In 2009 Ronald Hamburger wrote a paper (2) on the ConX connection in which he stated: The ConXR and ConXL systems are ideal for building applications that must be designed to resist progressive collapse resulting from vehicle impact, incendiary or explosive device attack. (1) Design of Steel Structures for Blast-Related Progressive Collapse Resistance Modern Steel Construction, March 2004 -Ronald O. Hamburger, Simpson Gumpertz & Heger -Andrew Whitaker, University at Buffalo, NY (2) The ConX Connection: A Bolted Special Moment Frame Connection for Seismic and Structural Integrity Applications March 2009 -Ronald O. Hamburger, Simpson Gumpertz & Heger