Basis of Print Volume Count: Physical or Bibliographic. Number of Electronic Books (included in question 2)



Similar documents
The California State University

Academic Libraries

Academic Libraries

2012 ALS Survey Items Change

Introduction. Degree Disciplines

New Program Proposal Master of Education Montessori Education With Concentrations in Preschool (ages 3-6) and Primary (grades 1-3) Lander University

South Dakota Board of Regents New Site: Request to Offer an Existing Degree Program

Colorado School Library Survey

CSU vs. UC. What s the Difference? Presented by: Lorena N. Ochoa, Transfer Counselor Victor Valley College

South Dakota Board of Regents - Request to Offer an Existing Degree Program University

Maryland Higher Education Commission Documents

Office of the President Phone: South Street, Suite 400 Fax:

Student Use and Assessment of Instructional Technology at UMass Boston.

MARSHALL COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE

NORTHWEST COMMI SSI ON ON COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES

The LASSIE Project. Libraries as a social space: enhancing the experience of distance learners using social software.

New Program Proposal Doctor of Philosophy in Hospitality Management USC-Columbia

45.2% 51.3% 51.2% 50.9% Board of Education. FY2012 Actual FY2013 Adopted FY2014 Adopted. FY2012 Actual FY2013 Adopted FY2014 Adopted

South Dakota Board of Regents New Site: Request to Offer an Existing Degree Program. Bachelor of Science in Dental Hygiene New Site(s)

Instructions and Definitions

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS FROM THE LITTLE HOOVER COMMISSION

Uses of Technology in Education Abroad

Best Practices in Social Media

BACCALAUREATE AND MASTER S DEGREES LETTER OF INTENT

LINDA CHRISTINE FOWLER

Social Networking Tools Comparison Chart

INVENTORY OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CATALOG COLLECTION,

IPEDS Updates. Mississippi Keyholder Conference Call. Wednesday, April 24th 10:00am

The ischool Institute Professional Learning Certificate in Social Media Engagement Proposal

New Program Proposal Bachelor of Arts Art Education USC Upstate

Budget Proposal Narrative Division: College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders

UH-Clear Lake Mission Statement

Constant Contact Small Business Pulse The Health and Wellness of Small Businesses

NAAB Annual Report -- Part I Statistical Report SECTION A. INSTITUTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS. 1. Program Contact Information:

BUDGET ADVISORY COMMITTEE FINAL BUDGET

H. Res In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

C10: Using Online Tools and Social Media to Attract New Students

New Program Proposal Master of Arts in Teaching Performing Arts College of Charleston

National Center for Education Statistics

GRADUATE COUNCIL - COLLEGE OF GRADUATE AND PROFESSIONAL STUDIES GRADUATE PROGRAM REVIEW PROCEDURES

IC Header Institution: University of Puerto Rico-Cayey (243151) User ID: P Overview

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR DOCUMENT 102 SELF STUDY (A STAND-ALONE DOCUMENT; NOT INTENDED TO BE A PART OF A DOCUMENT 102)

FY Compensation and Tuition & Fee Proposals April 9, Office of the Vice President for Budget and Finance 1

PROPOSED BUDGET

RUSA MARS User Access to Services Committee Discussion Forum. How Libraries are Using Web 2.0

BACCALAUREATE AND MASTER S DEGREES LETTER OF INTENT

Program Proposal Associate Degree in Health Science Major in Diagnostic Medical Sonography Greenville Technical College Barton Campus

Statistical Profile of New Brunswick s Publicly Funded Universities

Students College Preferences and Plans in the 2011 Admissions Cycle Results from the 2011 College Decision Impact Survey

Online Marketing for Academic Libraries

2006 Master of Library & Information Science Placement Survey. FACULTY OF INFORMATION AND MEDIA STUDIES The University of Western Ontario

FORMAL PROPOSAL FOR A NEW DEGREE PROGRAM and DISTANCE LEARNING DELIVERY (Program is New and Institution Currently Offers Distance Learning Programs)

COMMON UNIVERSITY DATA ONTARIO Brescia University College 2009

National Center for Education Statistics

ARTS & SCIENCES COUNCIL Committee on Faculty Research. Research Grants, Information & Application GENERAL INFORMATION

Sample Request For a National Institute Enrollment Program

SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Committee on Academic and Student Affairs

2008 North Texas Regional Library System (NTRLS) Salary Survey Report: Library Staff

Internal Review Process and Adjunct Instructor Retention

Procedures for Implementing New Graduate Programs 1

SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Academic and Student Affairs ******************************************************************************

Required Reports Regarding Healthcare-Related Services (AA )

Fire Risk Assessment Network

Application for North American Institutions

Office of Public Affairs

Georgia Perimeter College Faculty Senate New Program of Study

S a m p l e L i b r a r y / T e c h n o l o g y S u r v e y

The. California State University. System

The Cost of College Project

Shatford Library is committed to providing quality services and resources for Pasadena City College's diverse community

Case Study: Developing library staff digital literacies through social media and face-to-face workshops Subject area

DEVICE OWNERSHIP, BYOD & SOCIAL MEDIA FOR LEARNING

State Library of North Carolina Library Services & Technology Act Grant Projects Narrative Report

Ryan Johnson University of Mississippi

The Recording Arts Center Annual Report to the Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education Calendar Year 2013

SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Committee on Academic and Student Affairs

COLLEGE OF THE ALBEMARLE. Annual Program Review Summary (Business Administration Technology) (A )

Operational Unit Plan: 4-B. Library/Distance Learning

TECHNICAL LETTER HR/WB Page 2 of 2

Title: Student's Affairs Officer. Fax Number: Address:

Research Administration at the University of Maryland

Archiving the Social Web MARAC Spring 2013 Conference

Engaging through social media. Carl Holloway, Senior Communications Officer, Preston City Council

The California State University

Community College Faculty: We re Worth It!

FORMAL PROPOSAL FOR A NEW DEGREE PROGRAM and DISTANCE LEARNING DELIVERY (Program is New and Institution Currently Offers Distance Learning Programs)

Indiana Commission for Higher Education DISTANCE EDUCATION PROGRAM PROPOSAL

Library* Library Service for Modern Dental Education. in a Combined Medical-Dental-Pharmacy

Malawi Data profile 2012

National Center for Education Statistics

New Program Proposal Master of Business Administration College of Charleston

Uncomfortable Committing to Change Finding Success. Ellen Safley, PhD Dean of Libraries University of Texas at Dallas

Putting College Costs Into Context

Me, Text Me, Facebook Me:

National Intelligence University Research-Outreach-Education Quick Statistical Facts AY

For guidance, please review the State of Connecticut Regulations For Licensure and Accreditation of Institutions and Programs of Higher Education.

Table A - San Diego Convention Center Corporation Budget Summary

The Library Network Newsletter. April 09, 2012

Name/Title of Institutional Officer Signature Date. Person to Contact for More Information

Library Cooperation In Kansas City

Transcription:

COLLECTIONS (#) Number of Titles held June 30, 2013 (all formats) Number of Volumes held June 30, 2013 (print plus electronic) Basis of Print Volume Count: Physical or Bibliographic Number of Electronic Books (included in question 2) Are the below figures reported in Canadian dollars: Yes or No? Total Library Expenditures (exclude fringe benefits) (7+8+9) Total Library Materials Expenditures (7a+7b+7c) One-time Resources Purchases 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 (7a) 394,465 656631 Bibliographic 128517 No 2513613 340155 109433 96,535 161537 Bibliographic 64793 No 1704202 314083 2019 3,938,614 1330069 Physical 108890 No 3,173,696 1,054,253 133,391 589,301 637,751 Bibliographic 177,640 No $3,594,791 $686,985 $144,829 911,631 1,068,587 Physical 116,926 No $4,071,665 $1,067,086 $295,877 1,230,135 1,165,967 Physical 198,284 No $6,097,692 $1,673,698 $283,337 1,019,961 1,354,740 Bibliographic 36,958 No $5,655,634 $2,011,929 $241,110 721,134 665,168 Bib/Phy 98,957 No $2,551,231 $671,938 $73,933 1,171,891 2,610,485 Bibliographic 369,756 No $5,544,447 $1,972,959 $160,116 1,153,212 1,052,689 Physical 151,285 No $4,329,613 $1,612,676 $303,894 38,095 158,437 Bibliographic 120,342 No $652,023 $126,233 $39,966 163,844 n/a Bibliographic 17,157 No $1,440,229 $272,728 $70,280 1,344,864 2,069,863 Bibliographic 425,484 No $9,888,880 $3,017,999 $1,018,714 575,994 855,565 Bibliographic 36,559 No $4,138,075 $1,386,144 $245,800 1,237,656 1,482,335 Bibliographic 111,100 No $4,411,314 $1,555,501 $402,953 1,012,308 898,844 Bibliographic 180,028 No $2,478,399 $869,874 $432,187 6,616,686 2,241,654 Bibliographic 216,926 No $9,475,313 $3,205,172 $598,626 (IVC) 52,154 52,154 Bibliographic 0 No $62,000 $62,000 $0 2,451,483 1,470,996 Bibliographic 226,691 No $8,999,444 $2,652,701 $444,155 771,541 795,216 Bibliographic 32,867 No $5,078,957 $1,578,590 $249,280 444,031 465,991 Bibliographic 213,974 No $3,754,983 $711,863 $57,686 505,306 584,247 Bibliographic 131,000 No $3,086,825 $698,911 $114,460 342,799 515,257 Physical 7,819 No $1,934,670 $546,065 $63,371 26,783,640.00 22,294,183 3,171,953 No $94,637,696 $28,089,543 $5,485,417

EPENDITURES ($) (IVC) Ongoing Resources Purchases (e.g., subscriptions, annual license fees) Collection Support Total Salaries and Wages (8a+8b+8c) (Exclude fringe benefits/report fringe on Line 10) Professional Staff (exclude fringe benefits) Support Staff (exclude fringe benefit) Students Assistants (exclude fringe benefit) Other Operating Expenditures (7b) (7c) 8 (8a) (8b) (8c) 9 230722 0 1286256 604306 641781 40169 887203 252479 59585 1330610 916663 401710 56062 59509 897,500 23,362 1,845,327 770,651 808,742 265,934 274,116 $507,641 $34,515 $1,880,320 $1,012,356 $757,321 $110,643 $1,027,486 $765,135 $6,074 $1,939,601 $933,977 $755,665 $249,959 $1,064,978 $1,388,367 $1,994 $3,786,416 $1,538,347 $1,779,993 $475,586 $637,578 $1,658,294 $112,525 $3,291,158 $1,670,858 $1,380,953 $239,347 $352,548 $598,005 Unk $1,634,724 $690,893 $854,082 $89,749 $244,569 $1,161,322 $651,521 $3,571,488 $1,726,114 $1,563,966 $281,408 $956,962 $351,819 $2,641,029 $1,512,200 $925,194 $203,635 $75,908 $75,914 $10,351 $329,204 $196,368 $113,673 $19,163 $29,757 $165,590 $36,858 $1,097,318 $675,762 $326,328 $25,045 $70,183 $1,999,285 $0 $5,851,612 $2,319,671 $2,552,231 $929,710 $1,019,269 $1,049,309 $91,035 $2,549,702 $1,024,622 $1,346,321 $178,759 $202,229 $1,141,593 $10,995 $3,794,474 $2,059,605 $1,369,185 $365,685 $616,840 $428,292 $9,395 $1,364,019 $138,000 $1,024,129 $201,890 $244,506 $1,944,293 $662,253 $5,098,227 $2,173,306 $2,364,350 $560,571 $1,171,914 $0 $0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $1,903,617 $304,929 $5,192,889 $2,578,260 $2,234,619 $380,010 $1,153,854 $1,311,664 $17,646 $2,856,010 $993,659 $1,547,730 $314,621 $644,357 $648,692 $5,485 $2,185,357 $959,196 $1,059,225 $166,937 $857,763 $471,585 $112,866 $2,272,914 $994,250 $1,002,710 $160,954 $115,000 $476,386 $6,308 $1,191,523 $496,732 $640,546 $54,245 $197,082 $20,032,647 $2,509,516 $56,990,178 $25,985,796 $25,450,454 $5,370,082 $10,946,649

FRINGE BENEFITS EPENDITURES FROM ETERNAL SOURCES PERSONNEL (IVC) FRINGE BENEFITS (Provide a detailed footnote on what this includes) Fringe Benefits ($) Official Designated percent (%) Consortia/Networks/ Bibliographic Utilities Expenditures from External Sources) Total Staff FTE (13a+13b+13c) Professional Staff, FTE Support Staff, FTE Student Assistants, FTE Number of Library Presentations to Groups 10 11 12 13 (13a) (13b) (13c) 14 599107 47% $162,170 24 11 10 2 431 559231 44% $111,083 23 9 9 5 125 0 0% $208,156 56 11 20 25 119 $742,120 34% $177,541 37 12 17 8 104 UNK UNK $200,665 45 14 18 13 680 $0 0% $230,888 73 18 29 26 262 $1,544,733 36% $266,403 68 24 31 13 589 $545,762 n/a $171,355 35 10 18 7 212 $0 0% $289,181 68 19 34 15 640 $1,065,240 $247,164 48 16 21 11 757 $166,828 n/a $98,894 3 4 2 2 185 n/a n/a $129,566 16 8 7 2 80 $2,192,650 41% $0 130 24 58 48 1042 $1,197,493 47% $230,942 48 12 28 8 49 n/a n/a $254,293 71 22 30 19 454 $402,825 $217,168 24 1 11 12 169 $2,111,910 45% $288,263 106 26 49 30 360 n/a n/a n/a 9 1 2 6 5 $257,016 $2,187,515 42% $279,630 91 33 39 19 852 $1,221,864 n/a $234,095 57 12 29 16 461 n/a n/a $175,177 47 13 26 8 393 $0 0% $167,786 34 13 17 4 278 $599,567 38% $156,201 25 8 14 3 274 $13,236,387 4,553,635.91 1,138 321 519 302 8,521

INSTRUCTION REFERENCE CIRCULATION (IVC) Is the Library Presentations Figure based on Sampling: Yes or No? Number of Total Is the Total Participants in Group Participants in Group Presentations Figure based on Presentations reported in Sampling: Yes or No? Line 14 Number of reference transactions Is the reference transactions figure based on sampling: Yes or No? Number of initial circulations (excluding reserves) (14a) 15 (15a) 16 (16a) 17 No 5,472 No 16,764 Yes 18,617 No 2,887 No n/a n/a 38,888 No 3,651 No 32,500 No 48,369 No 2,907 No 16,950 Yes 10,622 No 3,711 No 12,014 No 33,858 Yes 6,550 Yes 11,102 No 229,428 No 17,550 No 8,405 No 75,631 No 7,985 No 620 Yes 57,238 No 11,323 No 30,043 No 132,150 No 21,348 No 2,032 Yes 78,141 No 4,380 No 2,720 Yes 5,758 No 1,653 No 2,455 No 28,607 No 29,281 No 24,198 No 87,488 No 3,261 No 94,296 No 46,407 No 10,750 No 15,400 Yes 124,664 No 4,655 No 9,308 No 71,693 No 11,745 No 42,811 No 124,843 No 100 No 75 No n/a No 31,328 No 52,050 Yes 109,122 No 13,780 No 1,273 No 44,000 No 11,176 No 13,231 No 23,704 No 8,355 No 56,108 187,954 No 4,454 No 4,676 No 50,834 218,302 449,031 1,628,016

(IVC) Number of successful full-text article requests (journals) USE OF ELECTRONIC RESOURCES (following COUNTER definitions) (#) Number of Number of regular federated searches (databases) searches (databases) INTERLIBRARY LOANS (#) DOCTOR'S DEGREES AND FACULTY (#) Total number of filled requests PROVIDED TO other libraries Total number of filled requests RECEIVED FROM other library or providers Number of Doctor's Degrees awarded in FY 2012-13 Number of fields in which Doctor's Degrees can be awarded Number of fulltime instructional faculty in FY 2012-13 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 460,571 2,808,446 UNK 6,018 4,183 0 0 146 285,033 642,369 n/a 1,398 3,847 0 0 638,926 11,691,391 822,204 7,229 7,248 448 354,218 1,542,340 2,710 5,102 n/a n/a 267 797,633 208,549 14,799 9,953 11,866 5 1 486 600,882 1,014,080 1,420 16,965 10,965 30 3 625 1,426,937 2,943,891 38,623,890 21,082 27,021 26 2 900 147,815 599,537 n/a 4,251 7,684 n/a n/a 265 n/a n/a n/a 39,071 72,308 20 4 1,070 5,356,951 3,775 7,843 11 2 520 3,285 47,248 0 151 460 n/a n/a 2 253,351 444,504 50,463 1,320 3,408 0 0 346 5,961,450 7,745,072 1,744,012 10,877 8,701 21 2 760 731,166 1,021,788 101,935 21,830 12,104 0 0 532 1,302,482 859,968 541,557 17,760 7,898 17 3 660 32,314 1,887,101 545,455 984,384 5,208,503 60,260 22,943 20,839 109 22 742 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2,386,732 9,973,090 17,695,204 23,823 18,467 0 1 619 1,352,892 3,597,887 94,898 16,759 25,182 0 0 781 599,359 910,554 228 12,601 8,817 0 1 238 253,666 803,385 0 9,948 8,259 0 0 241 324,241 497,455 69,506 4,974 4,130 8 1 274 18,897,337 54,447,158 65,722,782 255,438 276,332 247 42 9,922

ENROLLMENT - FALL 2012 (#) (IVC) Full-time students, undergraduate and graduate Part-time students, undergraduate and graduate Full-time graduate students Part-time graduate students 26 27 28 29 7,409 1,589 865 518 4,400 n/a 200 n/a 15,257 1,213 1,183 9,610 4,497 1,048 1,199 11,168 2,683 1,193 1,208 17,150 2,554 886 1,380 27,362 10,315 1,290 4,059 7,420 696 373 146 28,460 7,126 2,068 2,064 16,847 4,908 1,856 1,825 951 25 24 1 4,960 475 83 169 29,181 6,983 1,897 2,000 18,429 3,727 592 1,022 28,539 6,140 2,998 1,224 26,260 5,337 2,787 2,186 n/a n/a n/a n/a 23,420 7,028 3,100 2,191 18,679 653 875 8,131 2,478 122 313 7,614 1,407 326 573 7,038 1,844 717 544 318,285 71,678 24,483 22,622

TRENDS Channel Islands Dominguez Hills 1 Are you aware of the 2011 revision of the ACRL Standards for Libraries: Yes or No? Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No If you are aware of these Standards but have not used them, please share your reasons. 2 (Check all that apply) Desire quantitative guidelines Have an assessment plan in place Have not used yet, but plan to in the future No campus support for use of library standards Too many procedural/implementation questions about the Standards Use regional accreditation standards instead If you have used the document, please specify the use. (Please check all that apply). For each one checked, indicate level of usefulness: Very useful / / Not at 3 all useful To justify library budget Not at all useful To justify staff maintenance or expansion Not at all useful To justify collection upgrade To justify improvement of services in general To set or measure benchmarks for library improvement To prepare accreditation reports To engage in library self study As a guide for strategic planning Very useful To assess the library's performance To orient/educate college administration To facilitate conversations about the library Other (please describe how you used the document, and whether you found it useful for that purpose) Personnel reasons 4 Please rate the overall usefulness of the Standards for your purpose: Very useful / / Not all useful Very useful Somewhat n/a 5 Does your library use social media: Yes or No? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 If yes, what social media does your library use? (Select all that apply) Blogs/microblogs Yes Delicious or similar social bookmarks Facebook Yes Yes Flickr IM Podcasts Reading lists / saving articles such as Mendeley RSS Twitter Yes Wikis Google Plus YouTube Yes Pinterest& YouTube 7 If yes, for what purposes? (Select all that apply) Book clubs or similar activities Communication of problems such as downtime for the catalog, databases, etc. Yes Community building Yes Friends of the Library Yes Learn more about your users Yes Marketing of events Yes Promotion of library services Yes Respond to feedback, suggestions, complaints Yes

TRENDS Are you aware of the 2011 revision of the ACRL Standards for Libraries: Yes or No? If you are aware of these Standards but have not used them, please share your reasons. (Check all that apply) Desire quantitative guidelines Have an assessment plan in place Have not used yet, but plan to in the future No campus support for use of library standards Too many procedural/implementation questions about the Standards Use regional accreditation standards instead If you have used the document, please specify the use. (Please check all that apply). For each one checked, indicate level of usefulness: Very useful / / Not at all useful To justify library budget To justify staff maintenance or expansion To justify collection upgrade To justify improvement of services in general To set or measure benchmarks for library improvement To prepare accreditation reports To engage in library self study As a guide for strategic planning To assess the library's performance To orient/educate college administration To facilitate conversations about the library Other (please describe how you used the document, and whether you found it useful for that purpose) Please rate the overall usefulness of the Standards for your purpose: Very useful / / Not all useful Does your library use social media: Yes or No? If yes, what social media does your library use? (Select all that apply) Blogs/microblogs Delicious or similar social bookmarks Facebook Flickr IM Podcasts Reading lists / saving articles such as Mendeley RSS Twitter Wikis If yes, for what purposes? (Select all that apply) Book clubs or similar activities Communication of problems such as downtime for the catalog, databases, etc. Community building Friends of the Library Learn more about your users Marketing of events Promotion of library services Respond to feedback, suggestions, complaints Monterey Bay (IVC) San Luis Obispo Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes n/a n/a Very useful Very useful Very useful n/a Not at all useful Very useful Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes x YouTube Pinterest

TRENDS Are you aware of the 2011 revision of the ACRL Standards for Libraries: Yes or No? If you are aware of these Standards but have not used them, please share your reasons. (Check all that apply) Desire quantitative guidelines Have an assessment plan in place Have not used yet, but plan to in the future No campus support for use of library standards Too many procedural/implementation questions about the Standards Use regional accreditation standards instead If you have used the document, please specify the use. (Please check all that apply). For each one checked, indicate level of usefulness: Very useful / / Not at all useful To justify library budget To justify staff maintenance or expansion To justify collection upgrade To justify improvement of services in general To set or measure benchmarks for library improvement To prepare accreditation reports To engage in library self study As a guide for strategic planning To assess the library's performance To orient/educate college administration To facilitate conversations about the library Other (please describe how you used the document, and whether you found it useful for that purpose) Please rate the overall usefulness of the Standards for your purpose: Very useful / / Not all useful Does your library use social media: Yes or No? If yes, what social media does your library use? (Select all that apply) Blogs/microblogs Delicious or similar social bookmarks Facebook Flickr IM Podcasts Reading lists / saving articles such as Mendeley RSS Twitter Wikis If yes, for what purposes? (Select all that apply) Book clubs or similar activities Communication of problems such as downtime for the catalog, databases, etc. Community building Friends of the Library Learn more about your users Marketing of events Promotion of library services Respond to feedback, suggestions, complaints Yes Yes Yes n/a Yes