39. Supplemental Data



Similar documents
HEDIS/CAHPS 101. August 13, 2012 Minnesota Measurement and Reporting Workgroup

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Focus on Stage 2. Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator

Adopting an EHR & Meaningful Use

STAGES 1 AND 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

Attribute appropriate and inappropriate services to provider of initial visit

SUMMARY TABLE OF MEASURES, PRODUCT LINES AND CHANGES

Meaningful Use. Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

CMS & ehr - An Update

Meaningful Use 2015 and beyond. Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist

EQR PROTOCOL 2 VALIDATION OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES REPORTED BY THE MCO

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Welcome to the Data Analytics Toolkit PowerPoint presentation on clinical quality measures, meaningful use, and data analytics.

Weight Assessment and Counseling for Nutrition and Physical Activity for Children/Adolescents (WCC)

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

STAGE 2 of the EHR Incentive Programs

How to Achieve Meaningful Use with ICANotes

InteliChart. Putting the Meaningful in Meaningful Use. Meeting current criteria while preparing for the future

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Implementation Guide

How We Make Sure You Get the Best Health Care

MEANINGFUL USE. Community Center Readiness Guide Additional Resource #13 Meaningful Use Implementation Tracking Tool (Template) CONTENTS:

Stage 1 measures. The EP/eligible hospital has enabled this functionality

Meaningful Use Updates. HIT Summit September 19, 2015

1. How are you using health IT enabled clinical quality measures for internal quality improvement efforts and patients care?

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2015 Tipsheet

EQR PROTOCOL 4 VALIDATION OF ENCOUNTER DATA REPORTED BY THE MCO

Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program. Stage 2 Final Rule Update Part 2

EHRs vs. Paper-based Systems: 5 Key Criteria for Ascertaining Value

Continuity of Care Guide for Ambulatory Medical Practices

Patient Centered Medical Home

Meaningful Use Updates Stage 2 and 3. Julia Moore, Business Analyst SMC Partners, LLC July 8, 2015

Presented by. Terri Gonzalez Director of Practice Improvement North Carolina Medical Society

MEETING MEANINGFUL USE IN MICROMD -STAGE TWO- Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist

Agenda. What is Meaningful Use? Stage 2 - Meaningful Use Core Set. Stage 2 - Menu Set. Clinical Quality Measures (CQM) Clinical Considerations

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Certification: A Guide for EHR Product Managers

NYS-HCCN TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR USERS OF VITERA INTERGY

Examples of Quality Improvement Projects in Adult Immunization

Incentives to Accelerate EHR Adoption

Meaningful Use Stage 1:

Nursing Home Facility Implementation Overview

Checklist and Related Guidance for Meaningful Use Audits

EHR Incentive Program Updates. Jason Felts, MS HIT Practice Advisor

Meaningful Use Stage 2 MU Audits

EHR Meaningful Use Incentives for School-Based Health Clinics

Stage 2 Meaningful Use What the Future Holds. Lindsey Wiley, MHA HIT Manager Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Presenter: Linda Wise, EMR Training Specialist

A Guide to Understanding and Qualifying for Meaningful Use Incentives

Meaningful Use 2015: Modified Stage 2 Objectives and Measures

Qualifying for Medicare Incentive Payments with Crystal Practice Management. Version

Medicare and Medicaid Programs; EHR Incentive Programs

EQR PROTOCOL 6 CALCULATION OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES

ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS. Nonfederal Efforts to Help Achieve Health Information Interoperability

Defining the Core Clinical Documentation Set

Meaningful Use Stage 2

Webinar #1 Meaningful Use: Stage 1 & 2 Comparison CPS 12 & UDS 2013

Eligible Professional s Checklist 2015 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use

APPENDIX A: OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES FOR 2015 THROUGH 2017 (MODIFIED STAGE 2) EP Objectives and Measures

Overview of MU Stage 2 Joel White, Health IT Now

Frequently Asked Questions: Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Payment Program

MICROMD EMR VERSION OBJECTIVE MEASURE CALCULATIONS

Proposed Rule for Meaningful Use Stage 2

How To Improve Health Information Exchange

Reporting Period: For Stage 2, the reporting period must be the entire Federal Fiscal Year.

NY Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Eligible Professionals Meaningful Use Stage 2 (MU2) Webinar

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012

Explanation of care coordination payments as described in Section of the PCMH provider manual

Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Attestation Manual

Using EHRs, HIE, & Data Analytics to Support Accountable Care. Jonathan Shoemaker June 2014

EHR Incentive Program Stage 3 Objectives & Measures Crosswalk of Stage 3 Proposed Objectives, Measures & Corresponding Stage 2 Measures

West Virginia Meaningful Use Registration System Instructions

STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE CORE AND MENU MEASURES FOR ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONALS

More Meaningful Meaningful Use Solutions to help providers maximize reimbursements with minimal office disruption

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison for Eligible Professionals

1a-b. Title: Clinical Decision Support Helps Memorial Healthcare System Achieve 97 Percent Compliance With Pediatric Asthma Core Quality Measures

Transcription:

General Guideline 39 1 39. Data uses may help determine: may not be used to determine: To supplement claims for calculating HEDIS measures, organizations may use sources other than claims and encounters to collect about their members and about delivery of health services to their members. Validation and review of these differ by the processes used to collect and report them. The numerator. Optional exclusions. Eligible-population required exclusions not related to timing of the denominator event or diagnosis. For example: Use of Imaging Studies for Low Back Pain. Organizations may use for members who have cancer, but may not use for members whose recent trauma, IV drug abuse or neurological impairment must be assessed in relation to the low back pain event. Use of Appropriate Medications for People With Asthma, Medication Management for People With Asthma and Asthma Medication Ratio. Organizations may use for members who have any condition in step 3, Required Exclusions for the event/diagnosis. Denominator events. Organizations may not create and use records to identify denominator events, other than for optional exclusions and appropriate required exclusions. For example: Appropriate Testing for Children With Pharyngitis. Organizations may not use to find additional diagnoses for any claim that qualifies for the eligible population. Exclude claims with multiple diagnoses only. Chronic conditions. Organizations may not create and use records, on an ongoing basis, for exclusions for clinical conditions that change. Correcting bills or identifying valid errors. Organizations may not use to adjust incorrect billing practices or to identify valid errors. This practice results in a change in claims and is not allowed. For example: Organizations may not exclude a member from the Osteoporosis Management in Women Who Had a Fracture measure if the medical record shows that a fracture did not occur in the time frame required by the measure but was billed by a provider for ongoing therapy. Note: Refer to Substituting Medical Records in the Guidelines for Calculations and Sampling for additional information and examples of valid errors. Data Definitions Standard Electronic files that come from service providers (providers who rendered the service). Production of these files follows clear policies and procedures; standard file layouts remain stable from year to year. Electronic files that may be used as standard : Laboratory result files. Pharmacy in a standard electronic format. Current or historic state encounter files in a standard electronic format.

2 General Guideline 39 Immunization in state or county registries (might vary from state to state, but are consistent for all records in each state s registry). Encounter from behavioral healthcare vendors. Electronic health record (EHR) vendor systems. Prior year s validated historic hybrid medical record results. These must be distinguishable from other that may be kept in the same file. Audit requirements. Standard files are not required to be accompanied by proof-of-service documents, and the audit should not require primary source verification unless requested by the auditor. Nonstandard Data used to capture missing service not received through administrative sources (claims or encounters) or in the standard files described above, whether collected by an organization, a provider or a contracted vendor. These types of might be collected from sources on an irregular basis and may be in files or formats that are not stable over time. Organizations must have clear policies and procedures that describe how the are collected, validated and used for HEDIS reporting. Examples of nonstandard : EHR modules (e.g., emeasure modules). Provider portals (i.e., electronic systems providers use to enter information about services rendered). Health Information Exchange registries. Provider abstraction forms. Audit requirements. All nonstandard must be substantiated by proof-of-service documentation from the legal health record. Proof-of-service documentation is required for only a sample as part of the audit s annual primary source verification. Proof-of-service documents allowed for primary source verification: A copy of the information from the member s chart from the service provider or the PCP. A copy of the clinical report or clinical summary from the visit for service, such as super-bills, lab reports, radiology reports (i.e., forms from the rendering provider proving that the service occurred). A screen shot of: Online EHR records. State- or county-sponsored immunization registry records. Proof-of-service documentation that is not allowed: Member surveys. Organizations and providers may not use information obtained from member surveys, except for collected for Language Diversity of Membership and Race/Ethnicity Diversity of Membership. Phone calls. Organizations may not conduct phone calls to members or providers to collect information about services rendered. Recorded phone calls are not proof-of-service.

General Guideline 39 3 Memberreported services Acceptable only if accompanied by proof-of-service documents from the legal health record, whether reported to a disease- or case-management clinician, collected during targeted quality improvement programs or reported during any other collection process. Proof-of-service documents must be mailed, faxed or otherwise delivered by the member to the entity contacting the member for the information. Permitted proof-ofservice documents may be: Super-bills. Lab and radiology reports. Sections of the member s legal health record showing the service or assessment. Documentation from the legal health record must be recorded, signed and dated by the rendering provider. When original proof-of-service documents are not available, member-reported information is acceptable only in the following circumstances: The information is collected, by the end of the measurement year, by the primary care practitioner while taking a patient s history. The information is recorded, dated and maintained in the member s legal health record. Organizations must get copies of the member s legal health record from the PCP who recorded the information. The information meets the specific requirements of the measure. All documents must meet the requirements for and the measure they apply to, and must be available for auditor review. Organizations collecting member-reported information must have documents describing the policies and procedures for contacting the member and for obtaining copies of legal health records. Note: It is considered best practice to collect directly from members for the Language Diversity of Membership and Race/Ethnicity Diversity of Membership measures. Member-reported (without proof-of-service documents from the legal health record) are acceptable for only these measures. Audit requirements. Member-reported services must be accompanied by proof-ofservice documents for every record, and the audit requires verification annually. PCP Primary care practitioner. For HEDIS reporting, a physician or nonphysician (e.g., nurse practitioner, physician assistant) who offers primary care medical services. Refer to Volume 2, Appendix 3: Practitioner Types for more information. Required Data Elements Standard Nonstandard Organizations must have policies and procedures for using files as standard. Files must have standard file layouts, standard fields and industry standard codes, and must include all elements required by the measure specifications, following the hybrid specifications when applicable. Nonstandard files must have all the elements required to meet the criteria specified by the measure specifications, following the hybrid specifications when applicable.

4 General Guideline 39 Electronic sources (i.e., portal, HIE, emeasure module). Data collected or reported from the practitioner who renders the clinical service must have evidence of accountability by the practitioner or practitioner group (i.e., signed contracts with accountability tied to passwords, e-signatures or TIN/PIN in each session or header record). Provider-abstracted forms. Provider forms may not be simple yes or no responses as evidence of member compliance. Forms must have all necessary elements required by the measure and be signed by the rendering practitioner, attesting to the accuracy of the information. Member-reported services All Proof-of-service documents. Proof-of-service documents required for memberreported services must include all elements required by the measure (i.e., date and place of service, procedure, prescription, test result or finding, practitioner type). Hybrid specifications must be followed for collected for hybrid measures. All proof-of-service documents must show that services were rendered by the deadline established for the measure (refer to General Guideline 42 for date specificity requirements). For all measures (including administrative-only measures), organizations must be able to determine that a test or service was performed within the period specified, not merely ordered. All used to show eligibility for exclusion must follow the requirements for exclusion in each measure. Data Timeline and Systematic Sample Requirements may be collected during the measurement year and into the beginning of the reporting year, but collection for nonstandard files must be completed by the March deadline listed in the Audit Timeline in General Guideline 9. must follow the specifications in each measure. If the measure has a hybrid specification, the elements used must comply with the hybrid requirements of the measure; however, must be used to calculate the administrative portion of the measure. For hybrid measures, after the sample is pulled, organizations must follow the policies for collecting information for the systematic sample described in General Guideline 40. collection may not be targeted only at members selected for the systematic sample. Data pulled from medical records for chart review for a hybrid measure may be used as in subsequent HEDIS reporting years, but must comply with the guidelines for element requirements and audit review. Identifying and Validating Data All (standard, nonstandard and member-reported) must be identifiable. Because can affect reporting and incentives, plans or vendors that load files into the HEDIS repository must mark the files, regardless of the source. Auditors must be able to assess the contribution have to the applicable components of the measure (numerator events or appropriate exclusions).

General Guideline 39 5 Auditors review all annually there are no exceptions. The annual review must include the following for each source, at a minimum: A completed current year s Roadmap Section 5, including all attachments. Impact from by measure (e.g., lists of numerator-positive hits from the, by measure; year-to-year comparisons of percentage increases associated with ; proportion of numerator compliance from.) Primary source verification where required or requested by the auditor. For additional information about audit requirements for, refer to Volume 5, HEDIS Compliance Audit : Standards, Policies and Procedures, released each November.