Meaningful Use Updates. HIT Summit September 19, 2015
|
|
|
- Alexandra Wilson
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Meaningful Use Updates HIT Summit September 19, 2015
2 Meaningful Use Updates Nadine Owen, BS,CHTS-IS, CHTS-IM Health IT Analyst Hawaii Health Information Exchange No other relevant financial disclosures.
3 Agenda: Review of Meaningful Use (MU) - NOT going away Penalties & Hardship Exemptions What s new in MU world? Relief for 2015 Modified Stage 2 Future MU Timeline Q & A Note: Focus of presentation will be for Eligible Professionals. Information for Eligible Hospitals and Critical Hospitals will be limited.
4 February 2009 American Recovery & Reinvestment Act HITECH Act - $19.2 billion dollars to increase use of Electronic Health Records (EHR) Eligible professionals will be paid for demonstrating use of a qualified or certified electronic health record in a meaningful manner
5 Staying the Course Transforming Health Care with Health IT
6 Medicare Eps This is a timeline of participation and payments of MU Annual Incentive Payments for Medicare Eps who attest to MU in: Year $18, $12,000 $18, $ 7,840 $11,760 $14, $ 3,920 $ 7,840 $11,760 $11, $ 1,960 $ 3,920 $ 7,840 $ 7,840 $ $ 0 $ 1,960 $ 3,920 $ 3,920 $ 0 $ 0 [ ] $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Total $43,720 $43,480 $38,220 $23,520 $ 0 $ 0
7 Medicaid EPs This is a timeline of participation and payments of MU Year 2013 $21,250 Annual Incentive Payments for Medicaid EPs who Adopt In: $8,500 $21, $8,500 $8,500 $21, $8,500 $8,500 $8,500 $21, $8,500 $8,500 $8,500 $8, $8,500 $8,500 $8,500 $8, $8,500 $8,500 $8, $8,500 $8, $8,500 TOTAL $63,750 $63,750 $63,750 $63,750
8 Eligible Professionals Medicare Doctor of medicine or osteopathy Doctor of oral surgery or dental medicine Doctor of podiatric medicine Doctor of optometry Chiropractor Medicaid Physicians Dentists Certified nursemidwives Nurse practitioners Physician assistants (if practicing in an FQHC or RHC lead by a PA)
9 Medicare vs Medicaid Incentive Programs Medicare Managed by CMS Last year to initiate participation to receive an incentive payment was 2014 Medicare payment reductions begin in 2015 for providers who are eligible but choose not to participate In the first year and all remaining years, providers must meet Meaningful Use objectives and measures Last year of program participation or payment year is 2016 Medicaid Managed by State Last year to initiate participation is Eligible Professionals (EPs) can receive up to $63,750 in incentive payments No Medicaid payment reductions for EPs who choose not to participate. Medicare payment adjustments will still apply In the first year, EPs can receive an incentive payment for adopting, implementing or upgrading a certified EHR. In all remaining years, providers must meet the same MU objectives required by the Medicare EHR Incentive program Last year of program participation or payment year is 2021
10 Payment Adjustments and Hardship Exceptions
11 Medicare Payment Adjustments Started in 2014 for EHs Started in 2015 for EPs If you did not attest for 2013 or by Oct 1, 2014 if you are attesting to MU for first time Continues in 2016 and beyond Demonstrate MU every year EPs must continue to demonstrate meaningful use every year to avoid payment adjustments in subsequent years If you are only eligible to participate in the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program, you are not subject to these payment adjustments.
12 EP Payment Adjustments Reporting Year Penalty Year Penalty % % % % % EPs receive the payment adjustment amount that is tied to the year that they did not demonstrate MU. For example, an EP who is eligible for a payment adjustment in 2017 will receive a 3% reduction regardless if this is their first or fourth year not demonstrating MU. The maximum payment adjustment can reach as high as 5%.
13 EH & CAH Payment Adjustments Eligible Hospitals Critical Access Hospitals Payment adjustments started Oct 1, 2014 for Medicare Eligible Hospitals. Adjustment is applied to the IPPS (Inpatient Prospective Payment System) payment rate. Payment adjustments for CAHs will be applied beginning with the fiscal year 2015 cost reporting period.
14 How EPs can avoid Payment Adjustments in 2016: Attested to MU for 2014 If attesting to MU in 2015 for the first time: Attest to MU by October 1, 2015 Begin reporting period by July 1, 2015 Due to NPRM and 2015 attestations not allowed until Jan 1, 2016, CMS may change Oct 1, 2015 deadline
15 Hardship Exemptions for EPs 2016 Infrastructure lack of broadband New Eligible Professionals Unforeseen Circumstances e.g. natural disasters Lack of face-to-face or follow up Providers at Multiple locations PECOS specialties (anesthiology, radiology, pathology) Must apply July 2, 2015 July 1, 2016 (annual application) Exemptions granted by CMS
16 Hardship Exemptions for EHs and CAHs 2016 Infrastructure lack of broadband New Hospitals with new CCNs Unforeseen Circumstances e.g. natural disasters Must apply April 2, 2015 April 1, 2016 (annual application)
17 What s new in MU world? NPRM Published 4/10/15 60 day comment period ended 6/15/15 Final review to OMB 9/3/15 Goal: 3 year outcome by end of 2017 Majority of individuals and providers can send, receive, find and use a common set of clinical information NPRM Stage 3 Published 3/30/15 60 day comment period ended 5/29/15 Final review to OMB 9/3/15 Goal: 6 year outcome by end of 2020 Advances in sharing and use of clinical information leads to consumer empowerment, patient centered care, active individual health management and greater sharing with public health community
18 What s new in MU world? Intended Purposes Why is CMS proposing changes?
19 What s new in MU world? Open date for 2015 attestations will be Jan 1, 2016 Deadline for 2015 attestations will be Feb 29, 2016 EPs cannot switch programs anymore HOWEVER EPs who have attested at least once in either program can attest on CMS Medicare Incentive site for purpose of avoiding payment adjustments. POS 22 (surgical center) may be added to definition of hospital-based provider Helps drive up % for ruling if 90% or more encounters at POS 21 and POS 23, provider is considered hospital-based and will not be subject to payment adjustments
20 Relief for 2015 EPs and EHs have 90 day reporting period in 2015 any continuous 90 day period within the calendar year. Don t need to start at beginning of month or quarter 2016 and on: Full calendar year (Jan 1 Dec 31). Exceptions for EPs and EHs attesting for first time For 2015 EHs can used any 90 day between 10/1/14 12/31/15 to catch up
21 BEFORE Relief for 2015 Modified Stage 2 for EPs STAGE 1 Eligible Professionals 13 core objectives 5-10 menu objectives 18 total objectives STAGE 2 Eligible Professionals 17 core objectives 3-6 menu objectives 20 total objectives AFTER MODIFIED STAGE 2 Eligible Professionals 10 objectives (including 1 Public Health objective)
22 Relief for 2015 Modified Stage 2 for EHs BEFORE EHs and CAHs 11 core objectives 5-10 menu objectives 16 total objectives AFTER MODIFIED STAGE 2 Eligible Hospitals 10 objectives (including 1 Public Health objective)
23 Relief for 2015 No longer required to report Record Demographics** Record Vital Signs** Record Smoking Status** Clinical or After Visit Summaries Structured Lab Results** Patient List Patient Reminders Electronic Notes Imaging Results** Family Health History Electronic Medication Administration Record (emar) Advanced Directives Structured Labs to Ambulatory Providers Provider Type EP/EH EP/EH EP/EH EP EP/EH EP/EH EP EP/EH EP/EH EP/EH EH EH EH ** Removed as a standalone measure but are required fields to meet Patient Electronic Access or the Summary of Care measures.
24 Relief for Objectives (including 1 Public Health objective) 1. CPOE (Computerized Physician Order Entry) 2. eprescribing 3. Clinical Decision Support (CDS) 4. Patient Electronic Access to Health Information (Patient Portal) 5. Protect Health Information or Security Risk Assessment (SRA) 6. Patient Specific Education 7. Medication Reconciliation 8. Summary of Care for Transitions of Care 9. Secure Electronic Messaging EPs only 10. Public Health Reporting a. Immunization Registry b. Syndromic Surveillance (not available to Hawaii) c. Case Reporting d. Public Health Registry e. Clinical Data Registry ** Removed as a standalone measure but are required fields to meet Patient Electronic Access or the Summary of Care measures.
25 Modified Stage 2
26 Modified Stage 2 9 core + 1 public health objectives Alternatives for EPs who were Stage 1 in 2015 All EPs need to report under Modified Stage 2 for CEHRT required Not accepting combo CEHRT Clinical Quality Measures (CQM) EPs: 9 CQMs covering at least 3 NQS domains EHs: 16 CQMs covering at least 3 NQS domains 90 day period for CQMs do not need to match 90 day period for MU
27 Modified Stage 2 1. Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) Objective Use CPOE for medication, laboratory, and radiology orders directly entered by any licensed healthcare professional who can enter orders into the medical record per state, local and professional guidelines Measure Measure 1: More than 60% of medication orders Measure 2: More than 30% of laboratory orders Measure 3: More than 30% of radiology orders Exclusion Measure 1: Any EP who writes fewer than 100 medications orders, EH-None Measure 2: Any EP who writes fewer than 100 laboratory orders, EH-None Measure 3: Any EP who writes fewer than 100 radiology orders, EH-None
28 2015 Alternates for Stage 1 1. Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) Alternate Objective No alternate objective Alternate Measure Measure 1: More than 30% of all unique patients with at least 1 medication in their medication list is seen by the EP or admitted to the EH s inpatient or emergency department have at least 1 medication order entered using CPOE Alternate Exclusion Measure 2: EP or EH may claim an exclusion for Measure 2 in 2015 Measure 3: EP or EH may claim an exclusion for Measure 3 in 2015
29 Modified Stage 2 2. Electronic Prescribing (erx) Objective EP: Generate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically EH: Generate and transmit permissible discharge prescriptions electronically Measure EP: More than 50% of all permissible prescriptions written by the EP are queried for a drug formulary and transmitted electronically using CEHRT EH: More than 10% of hospital discharge medication orders for permissible prescriptions (new, changed and refilled) are queried for a drug formulary are transmitted electronically using CEHRT Exclusion EP: Any EP who writes fewer than 100 permissible prescriptions, or does not have a pharmacy within the organization or no pharmacies that accept erx within 10 miles of the EP practice location EH: Any EH that does not have an internal pharmacy that can accept erx or is not located within 10 miles of any pharmacies that accepts erx
30 2015 Alternates for Stage 1 2. Electronic Prescribing (erx) Alternate Objective EP/EH: No alternate objective Alternate Measure EP: More than 40% of all permissible prescriptions written by the EP are transmitted electronically using CEHRT EH: None Alternate Exclusion EP: Same as Modified Stage 2 EH: If an EH was scheduled to demonstrate Stage 1 in 2015 or if they are schedule to demonstrate Stage 2 and did not intend to select the Stage 2 erx menu objective
31 Modified Stage 2 3. Clinical Decision Support Objective Use clinical decision support (CDS) to improve performance on high-priority health conditions Measure Measure 1: Implement 5 CDS interventions related to 4 or more CQMs Measure 2: Drug-drug & drug-allergy interaction checks are enabled and functional Exclusion Measure 1: None Measure 2: EP: any EP who writes fewer than 100 medication orders EH: None
32 2015 Alternates for Stage 1 3. Clinical Decision Support Alternate Objective No alternate objective Alternate Measure Measure 1: Implement 1 CDS Measure 2: No alternate Alternate Exclusion Measure 1: None Measure 2: EP or EH can claim an exclusion in 2015
33 Modified Stage 2 4. Patient Electronic Access Objective EP: Provide patients the ability to view online, download, and transmit their health information within 4 business days of the information being available to the EP EH: Provide patients the ability to view, download, and transmit information about a hospital admission Measure 1 Measure 2 EP: More than 50% of all unique patients are provided timely online access (4 days) to their health information subject to the EP s discretion to withhold certain information EH: More than 50% of all patients who are discharged from the inpatient or ED of an EH have their information available online within 36 hours of discharge EP: At least 1 patient seen by the EP (or their authorized representative) views, downloads, or transmits his or her health information to a third party EH: At least 1 patient discharged from the inpatient or ED of an EH (or their authorized representative) views, downloads, or transmits his or her health information to a third party
34 Modified Stage 2 4. Patient Electronic Access Exclusion EP: Any EP who 1. Neither orders nor creates any of the information listed for inclusion as part of the measures, or 2. Conducts 50% or more patient encounters in a county that does not have 50% or more of its housing units with 4Mbps broadband availability according to the latest information available from the FCC on the first day of the EHR reporting period EH: Any EH that is located in a county that does not have 50% or more of its housing units with 4Mbps broadband availability according to the latest information available from the FCC on the first day of the EHR reporting period
35 2015 Alternates for Stage 1 4. Patient Electronic Access Alternate Objective No alternate objective Alternate Measure No alternate measure Alternate Exclusion EP Measure 2: An EP may claim an exclusion for the second measure if in 2015 they were scheduled to demonstrate Stage 1, which does not have an equivalent measure EH Measure 2: An EH may claim an exclusion for the second measure if in 2015 they were scheduled to demonstrate Stage 1, which does not have an equivalent measure
36 Modified Stage 2 5. Protect Electronic Health Information Objective Protect electronic health information created or maintained by the CEHRT through the implementation of appropriate technical capabilities Measure Yes/No Exclusion None
37 2015 Alternates for Stage 1 5. Protect Electronic Health Information Alternate Objective No alternate objective Alternate Measure No alternate measure Alternate Exclusion None
38 Modified Stage 2 6. Patient Specific Education Objective Use clinically relevant information from CEHRT to identify patient-specific education resources and provide those resources to the patient Measure EP: More than 10% of all unique patients are provided patient- specific education resources identified by CEHRT EH: More than 10% of all unique patients admitted to the EH s inpatient or ED are provided patient-specific education resources identified by CEHRT Exclusion EP: Any EP who has no office visits during the EHR reporting period EH: None
39 2015 Alternates for Stage 1 6. Patient Specific Education Alternate Objective No alternate objective Alternate Measure No alternate measure Alternate Exclusion EP: EP may claim an exclusion if scheduled to demonstrate Stage 1 but did not intend to select the Stage 1 Patient Specific Education Menu objective EH: EH may claim an exclusion if scheduled to demonstrate Stage 1 but did not intend to select the Stage 1 Patient Specific Education Menu objective
40 Modified Stage 2 7. Medication Reconciliation Objective The EP or EH who receives a patient from another setting of care or provider of care or believes an encounter is relevant should perform medication reconciliation Measure The EP or EH performs medication reconciliation for more than 50% of transitions of care in which the patient is transitioned into the care of the EP or admitted to the EH s inpatient or ED Exclusion EP: Any EP who was not the recipient of any transitions of care EH: None
41 2015 Alternates for Stage 1 7. Medication Reconciliation Alternate Objective No alternate objective Alternate Measure No alternate measure Alternate Exclusion EP or EH may claim an exclusion for the Stage 2 Medication Reconciliation objective if scheduled to demonstrate Stage 1 in 2015 and didn t intend to select the Stage 1 Medication Reconciliation Menu objective
42 Modified Stage 2 8. Summary of Care or Transitions of Care Objective The EP or EH that transitions their patients to another setting of care or provider of care or refers their patient to another provider of care provides a summary care record for each transitions of care or referral Measure For more than 10% of transitions of care and referrals, the EP or EH: 1. Uses CEHRT to create summary of care record, and 2. Electronically transmits such summary to a receiving provider Exclusion EP: Any EP who transfers a patient to another setting or refers a patient to another provider less than 100 times EH: None
43 2015 Alternates for Stage 1 8. Summary of Care or Transitions of Care Alternate Objective No alternate objective Alternate Measure No alternative objective Alternate Exclusion EP or EH may claim an exclusion for the measure of the Stage 2 Summary of Care objective. There is no Stage 1 equivalent
44 Hawaii HIE Health enet Solution Transition of Care
45 Modified Stage 2 9. Secure Electronic Messaging (EPs only) Objective Use secure electronic messaging to communicate with patients on relevant health information Measure The capability for patients to send and receive a secure electronic message with the EP was fully enabled Exclusion Any EP who: 1. Has no office visits during the EHR reporting period, or 2. Conducts 50% or more of his or her patient encounters in a county that does not have 50% or more of its housing units with 4Mbps broadband availability according to the latest information available from the FCC on the first day of the EHR reporting period
46 2015 Alternates for Stage 1 9. Secure Electronic Messaging (EPs only) Alternate Objective No alternate objective Alternate Measure No alternate measure Alternate Exclusion An EP may claim an exclusion for the Secure Electronic Messaging measure if they were scheduled to demonstrate Stage 1 in Stage 1 does not have an equivalent measure
47 Modified Stage Public Health Reporting Objective The EP or EH is in active engagement with a Public Health Agency (PHA) or clinical data registry (CDR) to submit electronic public health data in a meaningful way using CEHRT, except where prohibited and in accordance with applicable law and practice Measure Active Engagement definitions: - Completed registration to submit data - Testing and validation, or - Production EPs will need to attest to 2 of the 5 available measures EHs will need to attest to 3 of the 6 available measures
48 Modified Stage Public Health Reporting Measure Max times measure can count toward objective for EP Immunization Registry reporting 1 2 Syndromic Surveillance reporting n/a n/a Case Reporting 1 1 Public Health Registry reporting * 3 4 Clinical Data Registry reporting ** 3 4 Electronic Reportable Lab Results n/a 1 Max times measure can count toward objective for EH * EPs and EHs may choose to report to more than one public health registry ** EP and EHs may choose to report to more than one clinical data registry
49 2015 Alternates for Stage Public Health Reporting Alternate Objective EPs required to successfully attest to 1 measure EHs required to successfully attest to 2 measures
50 Modified Stage 2 10a. Immunization Registry Measure The EP or EH is in active engagement with a PHA to submit immunization data and receive immunization forecasts and histories from the public health immunization registry/immunization information systems (IIS) Exclusions Any EP or EH who: 1. Does not administer any immunizations to any of the populations for which data is collected by the jurisdiction s immunization registry or IIS during the EHR reporting period 2. Operates in a jurisdiction for which no immunization registry or IIS is capable of accepting the specific standards required to meet the CEHRT definition at the start of the EHR reporting period, or 3. Operates in a jurisdiction where no immunization registry or IIS has declared readiness to receive immunization data from the EP or EH at the start of the EHR reporting period
51 Modified Stage 2 10a. Immunization Registry
52 Modified Stage 2 10c. Case Reporting Measure The EP or EH is in active engagement with a PHA to submit one case reporting of reportable conditions Exclusions Any EP or EH that: 1. Does not treat or diagnose any reportable diseases for which data is collected by their jurisdiction s reportable disease system during the EHR reporting period, 2. Operates in a jurisdiction for which PHA is capable of receiving electronic case reporting data from EPs and EHs in the specific standards required to meet the CEHRT definition at the start of the EHR reporting period, or 3. Operates in a jurisdiction where no PHA has declared readiness to receive electronic case reporting data at the start of the EHR reporting period
53 Modified Stage 2 10d. Public Health Registry Measure The EP or EH is in active engagement with a PHA to submit public health data and receive Exclusions Any EP or EH who: 1. Does not diagnose or directly treat any disease or condition associated with a public health registry in their jurisdiction during the EHR reporting period 2. Operates in a jurisdiction for which no public health agency is capable of accepting electronic registry transactions in the specific standards required to meet the CEHRT definition at the start of the EHR reporting period, or 3. Operates in a jurisdiction where no public health registry for which the EP, EH or CAH is eligible has declared readiness to receive electronic registry transactions at the beginning of the EHR reporting period
54 Modified Stage 2 10d. Hawaii Tumor Registry
55 Modified Stage 2 10e. Clinical Data Registry Measure The EP or EH is in active engagement to submit clinical data registry Exclusions Any EP or EH that: 1. Does not diagnose or treat directly any disease or reportable condition associated with a clinical data registry in their jurisdiction during the EHR reporting period, 2. Operates in a jurisdiction for which PHA is capable of accepting electronic registry transactions in the specific standards required to meet the CEHRT definition at the start of the EHR reporting period, or 3. Operates in a jurisdiction where no clinical data registry for which the EP or EH is eligible has declared readiness to receive electronic registry transactions at the start of the EHR reporting period
56 Modified Stage 2 10f. Electronic Lab Reporting (EH) Measure The EP or EH is in active engagement with PHA to submit ELR results Exclusions Any EH that: 1. Does not perform or order laboratory tests that are reportable in their jurisdiction during the EHR reporting period 2. Operates in a jurisdiction for which no PHA is capable of accepting the specific ELR standards required to meet the CEHRT definition at the start of the EHR reporting period, or 3. Operates in a jurisdiction where no PHA has declared readiness to receive ELR results at the start of the EHR reporting period
57 Modified Stage 2 CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES (CQMs) Report 9 CQMs that cover at least 3 NQS domains (EP) Report 16 CQMs that cover at least 3 NQS domains (EH)
58 CQM Reporting in EP Option 1: Attest online thru EHR Registration & Attestation system Option 2: Electronically report thru PQRS (Physician Quality Reporting System) Portal Medicare EH Option 1: Attest online thru EHR Registration & Attestation system Option 2: Electronically report thru Quality Net Portal Medicaid Attest online thru the Hawaii SLR (State Level Registry) system
59
60 Future of MU: NOT Going Away Sustainable Growth Rate to Merit-Based Incentive Payment System Starts Jan 1, 2019 based on 2017 actions MIPS=PQRS+MU+VBM EP composite score range points. MU = 25 points High performing EPs will be rewarded and Low performing EPs penalized Swing can go as high as 27% by 2022 Example: In 2022 for submitting the exact same Part B charges, say $1,000,000, some EPs might receive $1,180,000 and others receive $910,000
61 Links and References CMS EHR Incentive Program: Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/index.html CQMs: Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/ClinicalQualityMeasures.html Payment adjustments: Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/PaymentAdj_Hardship.html Hawaii Medicaid Incentive Program: NPRM : NPRM Stage 3: Medicare Modernization Act Repeal of SGR
62 Questions???
63 Mahalo! Hawaii Health Information Exchange (808)
Meaningful Use in 2015 and Beyond Changes for Stage 2
Meaningful Use in 2015 and Beyond Changes for Stage 2 Jennifer Boaz Transformation Support Specialist Proprietary 1 Definitions AIU = Adopt, Implement or Upgrade EP = Eligible Professional API = Application
EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview
EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview CMS recently released a final rule that specifies criteria that eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals, and critical access
Meaningful Use Updates Stage 2 and 3. Julia Moore, Business Analyst SMC Partners, LLC July 8, 2015
Meaningful Use Updates Stage 2 and 3 Julia Moore, Business Analyst SMC Partners, LLC July 8, 2015 Stage 2 Requirements 2015 EPs beyond 1st year of MU must report on a full year of data EPs in 1 st year
Stage 2 Meaningful Use What the Future Holds. Lindsey Wiley, MHA HIT Manager Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality
Stage 2 Meaningful Use What the Future Holds Lindsey Wiley, MHA HIT Manager Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality An Important Reminder For audio, you must use your phone: Step 1: Call (866) 906-0123.
Meaningful Use. Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Meaningful Use Medicare and Medicaid Table of Contents What is Meaningful Use?... 1 Table 1: Patient Benefits... 2 What is an EP?... 4 How are Registration and Attestation Being Handled?... 5 What are
Meaningful Use Stage 2
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Presented by: Sarah Leake, HTS Consultant HTS, a division of Mountain Pacific Quality Health Foundation 1 HTS Who We Are Stage 2 MU Overview Learning Objectives 2014 CEHRT Certification
EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2015 Tipsheet
EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2015 Tipsheet CMS recently published a final rule that specifies criteria that eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals,
MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 2015 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY
MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 2015 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS EPs must meet or qualify for an exclusion to 17 core objectives EPs must meet 3 of the 6 menu measures.
Stage 2 Final Rule Overview: Updates to Stage 1 and New Stage 2 Requirements
Stage 2 Final Rule Overview: Updates to Stage 1 and New Stage 2 Requirements The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued the Stage 2 Final Rule on September 4, 2012. The Stage 2 Final Rule
Meaningful Use 2015 and beyond. Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist
Meaningful Use 2015 and beyond Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist 1 Agenda A look at the CMS Website Finding your EMR version Certification Number Proposed Rule by the Centers for Medicare
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use 2015-2017
Click to edit Master title style Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use 2015-2017 Bruce Maki, MA M-CEITA / Altarum Institute Regulatory & Incentive Program Analyst 12/14/2015 1 1 Agenda 1. Overview of M-CEITA
Reporting Period: For Stage 2, the reporting period must be the entire Federal Fiscal Year.
Eligible Hospital and Critical Access Hospital (CAH) Attestation Worksheet for Stage 2 of the Medicare Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program The Eligible Hospital and CAH Attestation Worksheet
EHR Incentive Program Updates. Jason Felts, MS HIT Practice Advisor
EHR Incentive Program Updates Jason Felts, MS HIT Practice Advisor An Important Reminder For audio, you must use your phone: Step 1: Call (866) 906-0123. Step 2: Enter code 2071585#. Step 3: Mute your
MEETING MEANINGFUL USE IN MICROMD -STAGE TWO- Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist
MEETING MEANINGFUL USE IN MICROMD -STAGE TWO- Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist 1 Proposed Rule On April 15, 2015 CMS Issued a new proposal rule for the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive
Meaningful Use Stage 3 Proposed Rule: What it Means for Hospitals, Physicians & Health IT Developers
Meaningful Use Stage 3 Rule: What it Means for Hospitals, Physicians & Health IT Developers Vernessa T. Pollard and Nicole Liffrig Molife April 2015 With the publication of the Stage 3 Meaningful Use Rule
MEDICFUSION / HERFERT. MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 1 and 2 ATTESTATION GUIDE 2015
MEDICFUSION / HERFERT MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 1 and 2 ATTESTATION GUIDE 2015 The following document is intended to aid in preparation for gathering necessary information to attest in early 2016. All Medicfusion
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Modified Stage 2: through 2017 November 10, Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator [email protected] November 10, 1 Key Concepts for Modified Stage 2 Restructured
EHR Incentive Program Stage 3 Objectives & Measures Crosswalk of Stage 3 Proposed Objectives, Measures & Corresponding Stage 2 Measures
EHR Incentive Program Stage 3 Objectives & Measures Crosswalk of Stage 3 Proposed Objectives, Measures & Corresponding Stage 2 Measures Objective 1: Protect Patient Health Information Measures: 1 (Complete
APPENDIX A: OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES FOR 2015 THROUGH 2017 (MODIFIED STAGE 2) EP Objectives and Measures
APPENDIX A: OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES FOR 2015 THROUGH (MODIFIED STAGE 2) Objectives for Measures for Providers in EP Objectives and Measures Objective 1: Protect Patient Health Information Objective 2:
STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE CORE AND MENU MEASURES FOR ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONALS
STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE CORE AND MENU MEASURES FOR ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONALS CORE MEASURES must meet all CPOE for Medication, Laboratory and Radiology Orders Objective: Use computerized provider order entry
Overview of the EHR Incentive Program
Overview of the EHR Incentive Program presented by Meaningful Use Stages 1 & 2 1 P Automated coding P Chief-complaint-driven P AnticiPlate Technology P Point-and-Click Functionality P erx through Surescripts
Incentives to Accelerate EHR Adoption
Incentives to Accelerate EHR Adoption The passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 provides incentives for eligible professionals (EPs) to adopt and use electronic health records
MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY
MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY On August 24, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) posted the much anticipated final rule for Stage
Meaningful Use Final Rule Update. Patti Kritzberger, RHIT, CHPS Tracey Regimbal, RHIT HIT-Quality Improvement Specialists
Meaningful Use Final Rule Update Patti Kritzberger, RHIT, CHPS Tracey Regimbal, RHIT HIT-Quality Improvement Specialists Learning Objectives Gain understanding of Modified Stage 2 2015-2017 program requirements
Eligible Professional s Checklist 2015 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use
This checklist provides a look into Ohio s Medicaid Provider Incentive Program (MPIP) system for eligible professionals and may be used as a guide to help eligible professionals gather information that
Summary of the Final Rule for Meaningful Use for 2015 and 2016. Meaningful Use Objectives for 2015 and 2016
Image Research, LLC Christopher B. Sullivan, Ph.D. 2901 Quail Rise Court, Tallahassee, FL 32309 Summary of the Final Rule for Meaningful Use for 2015 and 2016 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers
Meaningful Use Stage 2 MU Audits
Meaningful Use Stage 2 MU Audits Presented by: Deb Anderson, CPHIMS HTS Consultant HTS, a division of Mountain Pacific Quality Health Foundation 1 CEHRT Certified Electronic Health Record Technology (EHR)
Agenda. What is Meaningful Use? Stage 2 - Meaningful Use Core Set. Stage 2 - Menu Set. Clinical Quality Measures (CQM) Clinical Considerations
AQAF Health Information Technology Forum Meaningful Use Stage 2 Clinical Considerations Marla Clinkscales & Mike Bice Alabama Regional Extension Center (ALREC) August 13, 2013 0 Agenda What is Meaningful
Meaningful Use Stage 1:
Whitepaper Meaningful Use Stage 1: EHR Incentive Program Information -------------------------------------------------------------- Daw Systems, Inc. UPDATED: November 2012 This document is designed to
STAGES 1 AND 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1
STAGES 1 AND 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1 Requirement CPOE Use CPOE for medication orders directly entered by any licensed health care professional who can enter orders into the
STAGE 2 of the EHR Incentive Programs
EHR Incentive Programs A program administered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Eligible Professional s Guide to STAGE 2 of the EHR Incentive Programs September 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS...
Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Last Updated: August, 2012
CORE OBJECTIVES (16 total) Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Last Updated: August, 2012 Stage 1 Objective Use CPOE for medication orders directly entered by any licensed
EHR/Meaningful Use 2015-2017
EHR/Meaningful Use 2015-2017 The requirements for Meaningful Use attestation have changed due to the recently released Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Stage 3
CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview October 8, 2015
CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview October 8, 2015 Elizabeth S. Holland Center for Clinical Standards and Quality Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Objectives Summary CORE OBJECTIVES (You must meet all objectives unless exclusion applies.)
EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Objectives Summary CORE OBJECTIVES (You must meet all objectives unless exclusion applies.) TARGETING CANCER CARE Objective Objective Description Measure/Attestation Requirement
Stage 2 Overview Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012
Stage 2 Overview Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012 Overview CMS recently published a final rule that specifies the Stage 2 criteria that eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals, and critical
Agenda. Overview of Stage 2 Final Rule Impact to Program
Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Payment Program Review of Meaningful Use Stage 2 Regulation Changes and Other Impacts to the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program for 2014 that combines the effective
The Future of Meaningful Use
The Future of Meaningful Use Stage 3 Erin Dormaier, CHTS-IM, PCMH CCE Transformation Support Services Manager 2015 CORHIO All Rights Reserved CORHIO Proprietary Not For Redistribution 1 Agenda Stage 3
DEMONSTRATING MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 1 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EHR TECHNOLOGY IN 2015
DEMONSTRATING MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 1 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EHR TECHNOLOGY IN 2015 The chart below lists the measures (and specialty exclusions) that eligible providers must
Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison for Eligible Professionals
Stage 1 vs. Comparison for Eligible Professionals CORE OBJECTIVES (17 Total) Stage 1 Objective Stage 1 Measure Objective Measure Use CPOE for Medication orders directly entered by any licensed healthcare
CMS EHR Incentive Programs:
CMS EHR Incentive Programs: An Overview Meaningful Use Stages Vidya Sellappan Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Office of E-Health Standards and Services HIT Initiatives Group August 13, 2014 Table
LOOKING FORWARD TO STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE. 2012 Louisiana HIPAA & EHR Conference Presenter: Kathleen Keeley
LOOKING FORWARD TO STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE 2012 Louisiana HIPAA & EHR Conference Presenter: Kathleen Keeley Topics of Discussion Stage 2 Eligibility Stage 2 Meaningful Use Clinical Quality Measures Payment
Overview of MU Stage 2 Joel White, Health IT Now
Overview of MU Stage 2 Joel White, Health IT Now 1 Agenda 1. Introduction 2. Context 3. Adoption Rates of HIT 4. Overview of Stage 2 Rules 5. Overview of Issues 6. Trend in Standards: Recommendations v.
An Overview of Meaningful Use: FAQs
An Overview of Meaningful Use: FAQs On Feb. 17, 2009, President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) into law. This new law includes provisions (known as the HITECH Act)
Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012
Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012 CORE OBJECTIVES (17 total) Stage 1 Objective Stage 1 Measure Stage 2 Objective Stage 2 Measure Use CPOE for medication
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Focus on Stage 2. Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator [email protected]
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Focus on Stage 2 Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator [email protected] Understanding Participation Program Year Program Year January 1 st - December 31st. Year
Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program. Stage 2 Final Rule Update Part 2
Office of Medical Assistance Programs Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule Update Part 2 November 7, 2012 Medical Assistance HIT Initiative 1 Office of Medical Assistance
DEMONSTRATING MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 1 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EHR TECHNOLOGY IN 2014
DEMONSTRATING MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 1 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EHR TECHNOLOGY IN 2014 The chart below lists the measures (and specialty exclusions) that eligible providers must
Adopting an EHR & Meaningful Use
Adopting an EHR & Meaningful Use Learn how to qualify for the EHR Incentive Program The materials in this presentation, or prepared as part of this presentation, are provided for informational purposes
Meaningful Use Modification Rules for 2015-2017 Oct. 26, 2015 Author: Jennifer Swinnich, Associate Director, PAMED Practice Support
Meaningful Use Modification Rules for 2015-2017 Oct. 26, 2015 Author: Jennifer Swinnich, Associate Director, PAMED Practice Support The following is a summary of the Meaningful Use Modifications for 2015-2017.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs- Past, Present, & Future. Travis Broome, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 12/18/2012
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs- Past, Present, & Future Travis Broome, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 12/18/2012 Medicare-only Eligible Professionals Medicaid-only Eligible Professionals
Presented by. Terri Gonzalez Director of Practice Improvement North Carolina Medical Society
Presented by Terri Gonzalez Director of Practice Improvement North Carolina Medical Society Meaningful Use is using certified EHR technology to: Improve quality, safety, efficiency, and reduce errors Engage
Regulations Overview
Meaningful Use - Stage 2 Regulations Overview Brought to you by Presented by: Travis Broome, MPH, MBA September 18, 2012 Objectives Specific regulatory changes and requirements based on the CMS Stage 2
Changes with MU Stage 2. Presenter: Jennifer Oelenberger, Director and Acct Management
Changes with MU Stage 2 Presenter: Jennifer Oelenberger, Director and Acct Management We give back EHR Concepts takes pride in giving our clients resourceful information to prepare you for the next steps
Meaningful Use Objectives
Meaningful Use Objectives The purpose of the electronic health records (EHR) incentive program is not so much the adoption of health information technology (HIT), but rather how HIT can further the goals
Health Care February 28, 2012. CMS Issues Proposed Rule on Stage 2 Meaningful Use,
ROPES & GRAY ALERT Health Care February 28, 2012 CMS Issues Proposed Rule on Stage 2 Meaningful Use, ONC Issues Companion Proposed Rule on 2014 EHR Certification Criteria On February 23, 2012, the Centers
Meaningful Use: Stage 1 and 2 Hospitals (EH) and Providers (EP) Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality
Meaningful Use: Stage 1 and 2 Hospitals (EH) and Providers (EP) Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality Meaningful Use Stage 1 Focuses on Functional & Interoperability
Achieving Meaningful Use in 2014. Presented by the SFREC
Achieving Meaningful Use in 2014 Presented by the SFREC About the SFREC HEALTH CHOICE NETWORK DBA South Florida Regional Extension Center Established in 2010 as part of the ARRA The mission of the SFREC
Proposed Rule for Meaningful Use Stage 2
Proposed Rule for Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Old The Changes The New Continuing Medical Education Disclaimer hi i if h i i S d Ch i This is to certify that Marnivia Spencer and Chris Hudson have disclosed
The now tips, the how tools, and the must timing for your MU path in 2014.
Meaningful Use in 2014 - Window of Opportunity The now tips, the how tools, and the must timing for your MU path in 2014. Inside you will find: CLICK ON TITLES TO NAVIGATE MU 2014 updates; Must know changes!
9/9/2015. Medicare/Medicaid Incentive Program. Medicare/Medicaid Incentive Program. Meaningful Use, Penalties and Audits
Meaningful Use, Penalties and Audits SHERI SMITH, FACMPE STATE VOLUNTEER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY Copyright 2014 State Volunteer Mutual Insurance Company Medicare/Medicaid Incentive Program Medicare/Medicaid
Achieving Meaningful Use Training Manual
Achieving Meaningful Use Training Manual Terms EP Eligible Professional Medicare Eligible Professional o Doctor of Medicine or Osteopathy o Doctor of Dental Surgery or Dental Medicine o Doctor of Podiatric
Michigan Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Update Jason Werner - MDCH
Michigan Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Update Jason Werner - MDCH Program Timeline Meaningful Use Timeline Meaningful Use Stages st year 0 0 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 00 0 0 AIU $,50 3 TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 AIU
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Final Rule. Implementing the American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Final Rule Implementing the American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009 Overview American Recovery & Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act) February 2009 Medicare &
How To Improve Health Care Quality
Meaningful Use: At the Crossroads between Stage 1 and Stage 2 Presented by: Bruce Eckert, National Practice Director Date: April 19, 2013 Heading Agenda Ariel 40 Stage 2 Major Changes Payment Adjustments
MDeverywhere, Inc. Presents 2014 CMS EHR Incentive Program Requirements: What Providers Need To Know
MDeverywhere, Inc. Presents 2014 CMS EHR Incentive Program Requirements: What Providers Need To Know Presented by: Kristen Heffernan Director Product Management & Marketing, Henry Schein MicroMD Agenda
TABLE 4: STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE OBJECTIVES AND ASSOCIATED MEASURES SORTED BY CORE AND MENU SET
CMS-0044-P 156 TABLE 4: STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE OBJECTIVES AND ASSOCIATED MEASURES SORTED BY CORE AND MENU SET Improving quality, safety, efficiency, and reducing health disparities Use computerized provider
Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Hospitals and Eligible Professionals (EPs)
Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible and Eligible Professionals (EPs) Under the Electronic Health Record (EHR) meaningful use final rules established by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS),
Understanding Meaningful Use Stage 2
Understanding Meaningful Use Stage 2 Miranda Ladue, Manager, Product Management Adam Plotts, Manager, Product Management Copyright 2011 Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. Agenda Review MU Timeline MU
