Report to Rapport au: Ottawa Board of Health Conseil de santé d Ottawa 15 June 2015 / 15 juin 2015. Submitted on June 5, 2015 Soumis le 5 juin 2015



Similar documents
Report to/rapport au : Ottawa Board of Health Conseil de santé d Ottawa. October 21, octobre 2013

Report to Rapport au: Council Conseil 9 December 2015 / 9 décembre Submitted on October 26, 2015 Soumis le 26 octobre 2015

Report to/rapport au: Ottawa Board of Health Conseil de santé d Ottawa. November 18, novembre 2013

Report to/rapport au: Ottawa Board of Health Conseil de santé d Ottawa. Monday, January 21, 2013/ le lundi 21 janvier, 2013

PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT JUNE COMITÉ DE L URBANISME RAPPORT 31 LE 13 JUIN 2012

1. CANADA DAY 2012 PARKING LOT PARTIES IN THE BYWARD MARKET FÊTE DU CANADA 2012 CÉLÉBRATIONS TENUES DANS LE PARC DE STATIONNEMENT DU MARCHÉ BY

Report to/rapport au : Information Technology Sub-Committee Sous-comité de la technologie de l information. October 15, octobre 2012

Report to/rapport au : Ottawa Board of Health Conseil de santé d Ottawa. Monday, October 15, 2012/le lundi 15 octobre 2012

2 Report to / Rapport au:

PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT JULY COMITÉ DE L URBANISME RAPPORT 34 LE 11 JUILLET ZONING 505, 573 AND 605 INDUSTRIAL AVENUE

4. OTTAWA REGIONAL CANCER FOUNDATION LOAN REPAYMENT EXTENSION

11 Report to/rapport au:

RÉPONSE DE ÉNERGIE LA LIÈVRE S.E.C. ET D ÉNERGIE BROOKFIELD MARKETING INC. À LA DEMANDE DE RENSEIGNEMENT N o 1 DE LA RÉGIE DE L ÉNERGIE («RÉGIE»)

Guidance Document for the Risk Categorization of Food Premises

Report to/rapport au : Ottawa Board of Health / Conseil de santé d Ottawa. and Council / et au Conseil

Office of the Auditor General / Bureau du vérificateur général FOLLOW-UP TO THE 2010 AUDIT OF COMPRESSED WORK WEEK AGREEMENTS 2012 SUIVI DE LA

Report to/rapport au : Finance and Economic Development Committee Comité des finances et du développement économique. and Council / et au Conseil

Report to / Rapport au: OTTAWA PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD CONSEIL D ADMINISTRATION DE LA BIBLIOTHÈQUE PUBLIQUE D OTTAWA

Report to/rapport au : OTTAWA PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD CONSEIL D ADMINISTRATION DE LA BIBLIOTHÈQUE PUBLIQUE D OTTAWA. December 9, 2013 Le 9 decembre 2013

Report to/rapport au : OTTAWA PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD CONSEIL D ADMINISTRATION DE LA BIBLIOTHÈQUE PUBLIQUE D OTTAWA. October 15, 2013 Le 15 octobre 2013

Archived Content. Contenu archivé

Report to/rapport au : OTTAWA PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD CONSEIL D ADMINISTRATION DE LA BIBLIOTHÈQUE PUBLIQUE D OTTAWA. February 10, 2014 Le 10 février 2014

Report to/rapport au : OTTAWA PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD CONSEIL D ADMINISTRATION DE LA BIBLIOTHÈQUE PUBLIQUE D OTTAWA. October Le 15 octobre 2013

Report to/rapport au : OTTAWA PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD CONSEIL D ADMINISTRATION DE LA BIBLIOTHÈQUE PUBLIQUE D OTTAWA. February 10, 2014 Le 10 février 2014

Introduction au BIM. ESEB Seyssinet-Pariset Economie de la construction contact@eseb.fr

I will explain to you in English why everything from now on will be in French

Life Sciences. Volume 5 August Issue date: August 7, 2008

THE DEVELOPMENT OF OFFICE SPACE AND ERGONOMICS STANDARDS AT THE CITY OF TORONTO: AN EXAMPLE OF SUCCESSFUL INCLUSION OF ERGONOMICS AT THE DESIGN STAGE

Office of the Auditor General / Bureau du vérificateur général FOLLOW-UP TO THE 2007 AUDIT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS IN THE OTTAWA 20/20

Newsletter. Le process Lila - The Lila process 5 PARTNERS 2 OBSERVERS. October Product. Objectif du projet / Project objective

Expérience appui ANR Zimbabwe (Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe -MCAZ) Corinne Pouget -AEDES

The Addition to residences in Scotland, Canada

That the Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee recommend that Council:

5. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY CONTRACTS AWARDED FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2012 TO MARCH 31, 2012

Proposition d intervention

L'Innovation en quittant prématurément l'école

TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES Agreement Between the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CONGO

EVALUATION AS A TOOL FOR DECISION MAKING: A REVIEW OF SOME MAIN CHALLENGES

Third Supplement dated 8 September 2015 to the Euro Medium Term Note Programme Base Prospectus dated 12 December 2014

Report to/rapport au : OTTAWA PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD CONSEIL D ADMINISTRATION DE LA BIBLIOTHÈQUE PUBLIQUE D OTTAWA. February 10, 2014 Le 10 février 2014

Hours: The hours for the class are divided between practicum and in-class activities. The dates and hours are as follows:

Short Form Description / Sommaire: Carrying on a prescribed activity without or contrary to a licence

Report to/rapport au: OTTAWA PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD CONSEIL D ADMINISTRATION DE LA BIBLIOTHÈQUE PUBLIQUE D OTTAWA. December 9, 2013 Le 9 décembre 2013

Transition IR-OPS. 3.1 Examen des changements principaux Part ARO. Direction générale de l Aviation civile. Direction navigabilité et opérations

Fee Increases and Target Income Hypothesis: Data from Quebec on Physicians Compensation and Service Volumes

Guidance Document for the Provincial Food Handler Training Plan. Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

STAT SHEET PROFESSIONAL INSTITUTE OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE OF CANADA

Fondation Rennes 1. Atelier de l innovation. Fondation Rennes 1. Fondation Rennes 1 MANAGEMENT AGILE. Fondation Rennes 1 ET INNOVATION

Office of the Auditor General / Bureau du vérificateur général FOLLOW-UP TO THE 2007 AUDIT OF THE DISPOSAL OF PAVEMENT LINE MARKER EQUIPMENT 2009

The wolf who wanted to change his color Week 1. Day 0. Day 1. Day 2. Day 3. - Lecture de l album

Joint fisheries patrol Operational Action plan Workshop. Mauritius,

Kahnawake Emergencies A brief overview of our response / Survol des interventions

Archived Content. Contenu archivé

Privacy Policy on the Collection, Use, Disclosure and Retention of Personal Health Information and De-Identified Data, 2010

MANITOBA TRADE AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION ANNUAL REPORT 2012/13 SOCIÉTÉ DU COMMERCE ET DE L'INVESTISSEMENT DU MANITOBA RAPPORT ANNUEL 2012/13

Centre International de Hautes Etudes Agronomiques MÄditerranÄennes. International Centre for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies POINT 9

BILL C-665 PROJET DE LOI C-665 C-665 C-665 HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA

Towards harmonising quality assurance for postgraduate training and research in RUFORUM member universities

A Lean journey. Presented at the APEX symposium May 27, Jennifer Little Transport Canada. France Bergeron Alpen Path Solutions Inc.

Performance of evening street markets of agri-food products in Morogoro municipality, Tanzania

Il est repris ci-dessous sans aucune complétude - quelques éléments de cet article, dont il est fait des citations (texte entre guillemets).

Capacity building and Strengthening of the implementation of IOTC Conservation and management Measures. Madagascar

System Requirements Orion

HELPING HEALTH CARE: A HOSPITAL ERGONOMICS (MUSCULOSKELETAL INJURY) RISK ASSESSMENT PROJECT

Archived Content. Contenu archivé

Electrical/Electronics

Altiris Patch Management Solution for Windows 7.6 from Symantec Third-Party Legal Notices

Strategy and Procedures for Compliance and Enforcement

OCC1 546 STRATEGIES IN OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE

Financial Audit of Indian Economic Development Fund, Loan Guarantee Program Year Ended March 31, 1998

SUBJECT CANADA CUSTOMS INVOICE REQUIREMENTS. This Memorandum explains the customs invoice requirements for commercial goods imported into Canada.

2. Designate authority for minor design changes to the General Manager, Planning and Growth Management Department.

Document in support of an oral presentation the Municipality of Clarington. Document au soutien de la présentation orale de la ville de Clarington

EVENT NOTICE : Speed training camp and competitions : SBX FIS Level and Quebec Cup (provincial series) Mont-Tremblant, Québec January 10th-14th, 2012

CIHR Foundation Webinar November 26, 2013

Altiris Patch Management Solution for Windows 7.5 SP1 from Symantec Third-Party Legal Notices

Another way to look at the Project Une autre manière de regarder le projet. Montpellier 23 juin - 4 juillet 2008 Gourlot J.-P.

FRANCE FRANCE PHYSICAL ACTIVITY FACTSHEET PREVALENCE (%) OF ADULTS REACHING THE RECOMMENDED WHO PHYSICAL ACTIVITY LEVELS, 2006/2007

CNC Kompetenzzenter mit der multimedialen Software

Millier Dickinson Blais

THE CITY OF TORONTO S JOB DEMANDS ANALYSIS AND JOB MATCH SYSTEM

ATP Co C pyr y ight 2013 B l B ue C o C at S y S s y tems I nc. All R i R ghts R e R serve v d. 1

Report to/rapport au: OTTAWA PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD CONSEIL D ADMINISTRATION DE LA BIBLIOTHÈQUE PUBLIQUE D OTTAWA. May 12, 2014 Le 12 mai 2014

Appendix R Canadian Regulatory Review

AgroMarketDay. Research Application Summary pp: Abstract

Survey on use of Taser International 21ft cartridges

RAPPORT FINANCIER ANNUEL PORTANT SUR LES COMPTES 2014

Occupational Health and Safety Sector

Veritas Storage Foundation 5.0 Software for SPARC

DEVELOPMENT OF CSA-Z412 (2000) GUIDELINE ON OFFICE ERGONOMICS AS AN INTERACTIVE CD-ROM PRODUCT - PROCESS AND RESULTS OF USER TESTING

Recreational Water Protocol, 2016

Measuring Policing Complexity: A Research Based Agenda

Comparaison et analyse des labels de durabilité pour la montagne, en Europe et dans le monde.

Administrer les solutions Citrix XenApp et XenDesktop 7.6 CXD-203

Drugs, Help and Referral

Asset management in urban drainage

"Internationalization vs. Localization: The Translation of Videogame Advertising"

Health and Safety Workshops Program

The power of co-creation. Jean Marc Devanne CEO CoManaging

Archived Content. Contenu archivé

Transcription:

1 Report to Rapport au: Ottawa Board of Health Conseil de santé d Ottawa 15 June 2015 / 15 juin 2015 Submitted on June 5, 2015 Soumis le 5 juin 2015 Submitted by Soumis par: Dr. / D r Isra Levy Medical Officer of Health / Médecin chef en santé publique Contact Person Personne ressource: Dr/D re Vera Etches, Deputy Medical Officer / Médecin adjoint en santé publique Ottawa Public Health / Santé publique Ottawa 613-580-2424, ext./poste 23675, vera.etches@ottawa.ca Siobhan Kearns, Manager / Gestionnaire Environment & Health Protection/ Direction de l environnement et de la protection de la santé Ottawa Public Health / Santé publique Ottawa 613-580-2424, ext./poste 23483, siobhan.kearns@ottawa.ca Ward: CITY WIDE / À L'ÉCHELLE DE LA VILLE File Number: ACS2015-OPH-EHP-0002 SUBJECT: UPDATE ON OTTAWA PUBLIC HEALTH S FOOD SAFETY PROGRAM: OTTAWA SAFE TRIAL PROJECT OBJET: MISE À JOUR SUR LE PROGRAMME DE SALUBRITÉ DES ALIMENTS DE SANTÉ PUBLIQUE OTTAWA : PROJET PILOTE «OTTAWA SANS DANGER»

2 REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS That the Board of Health for the City of Ottawa Health Unit: 1. Approve the Ottawa Safe online trial project as part of the next phase of the Food Safety Program, as outlined in the report; and 2. Direct staff to report back on the Food Safety Program, including the Ottawa Safe trial project in 2017. RECOMMANDATIONS DU RAPPORT Que le Conseil de santé de la circonscription sanitaire de la ville d Ottawa : 1. Approuve le projet pilote en ligne «Ottawa sans danger» dans le cadre de la prochaine étape du Programme de salubrité alimentaire, comme l indique ce rapport; et 2. Charge le personnel de présenter un rapport sur le Programme de salubrité alimentaire, y compris le projet pilote «Ottawa sans danger» en 2017. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report provides an update on Ottawa Public Health s (OPH) Food Safety Program with focus on the program s three pillars including: Education; Inspection, and; Quality Assurance. OPH is recommending to the Board of Health to approve an enhancement to the online food safety inspection disclosure as a trial project called Ottawa Safe. The proposed trial project will use a system of red, yellow, and green flags online to communicate food premise inspection results - in a more user-friendly and easier to understand format - to the public and food premise operators. The goal of shifting the current online food inspection disclosure system to Ottawa Safe is to improve food safety standards, reduce the risk of food-borne illness, raise consumer awareness of food safety, and recognize businesses that consistently uphold food safety practices. Research shows disclosure systems improve compliance with food safety legislation and enhance food safety standards in food business establishments. Subject to Board of Health approval, OPH will implement Ottawa Safe with an emphasis on education, communication, and quality assurance. This approach will be designed to educate and engage the public and Ottawa s approximately 5,900 food premise operators on the enhanced Food Safety Program. Ottawa Safe will have new elements

3 added aimed at the public for increasing their understanding of food safety practices, as well as the trial system of food inspection disclosure. OPH will undertake an evaluation of the online disclosure trial, and table an update report with its findings regarding the Ottawa Safe trial in 2017, along with any recommendations for further amendments to the disclosure of food premise inspection information. RESUMÉ Le présent rapport vise à faire le point sur le programme de salubrité des aliments de Santé publique Ottawa (SPO) en mettant l accent sur ses trois piliers, soit l éducation, l inspection, et l assurance de la qualité. SPO recommande au Conseil de santé d approuver le projet pilote «Ottawa sans danger», une amélioration au système de diffusion en ligne des résultats des inspections de la salubrité des aliments. On propose d utiliser un système de couleurs (rouge, jaune et vert) en ligne pour communiquer les résultats des inspections des services alimentaires au grand public et aux exploitants de manière plus conviviale et claire. SPO a décidé de passer du système actuel de diffusion en ligne des résultats des inspections de la salubrité des aliments à «Ottawa sans danger», dans le but d améliorer les normes en matière de salubrité des aliments, de réduire les risques de maladie d origine alimentaire, de sensibiliser les consommateurs à la salubrité des aliments et de souligner le bon travail des entreprises qui appliquent constamment des pratiques appropriées. Des études ont montré que les systèmes de diffusion améliorent le respect de la réglementation sur la salubrité des aliments et incitent les services alimentaires à adopter des normes plus rigoureuses. Sous réserve de l approbation du Conseil de santé, SPO mettra en œuvre le projet «Ottawa sans danger», en mettant l accent sur l éducation, la communication et l assurance de la qualité. Cette approche vise à renseigner le public et les quelque 5 900 exploitants de services alimentaires d Ottawa à propos du programme de salubrité des aliments et à les sensibiliser. «Ottawa sans danger», offrira de nouveaux éléments permettant au public de mieux comprendre les pratiques en matière de salubrité des aliments, ainsi que le projet pilote du système de diffusion des résultats des inspections de la salubrité des aliments. SPO évaluera «Ottawa sans danger», puis présentera en 2017 un rapport d étape résumant ses conclusions concernant ce projet pilote et formulera des

4 recommandations de modification du processus de diffusion des renseignements sur les inspections des services alimentaires. BACKGROUND To promote food safety, and help prevent, identify, and control emerging food safety issues including food-borne outbreaks, Public Health Inspectors (PHIs) conduct over 14,000 inspections of restaurants, food facilities and food events annually. To build a foundation for successful compliance with required food safety practices at food premises, Ottawa Public Health s (OPH) Food Safety Program focuses on food safety education. During the inspection process, and when observing standard practices are not being followed (with respect to correct food handling and storage, equipment cleaning and disinfection, facility sanitation and employee hygiene), PHIs provide food premise operators and staff with on-site food handler training. OPH also offers a provincially certified food handler training course and promotes access to online food handler training. In 2014, OPH delivered 100 English, 16 French, one Cantonese and one Vietnamese certified food handler training courses, conferring 2,050 certified food handler certificates. Community Food Advisors, Food Banks and Public Health Dieticians are exempt from paying for Food Handler Training. Other agencies that have partnerships with OPH may request free Food Handler Training which OPH approves on a case-by-case basis. Quality assurance is also an integral part of OPH s Food Safety Program. Quality assurance works to uphold the program s principles of consistency and predictability, responsiveness, efficiency and effectiveness, to advance food safety in Ottawa. In May 2014, the Board of Health reviewed an update on the continued progress of OPH s Food Safety Strategy (ACS2014-OPH-EHP-0005), and information about planned future food safety initiatives. Over the past year, OPH has made strides with the three pillars of its Food Safety Program, including: Education; Inspection, and; Quality Assurance as outlined in Document 1. Food safety inspection disclosure of food premises was highlighted as a priority area for OPH focus. The Board directed OPH to investigate various food safety disclosure options to enhance transparency and accountability for both the public and food premise operators, in order to ensure the highest possible level of food safety at food premises. Since that time, OPH has engaged with food premise operators, local Business Improvement Associations (BIAs), residents, PHIs, and other Ontario public health units. OPH also reviewed relevant literature in the development of an informed approach to food safety inspection disclosure. This approach will assist OPH to

5 consistently meet inspection targets, provide clear guidelines to food premise operators, and recognize businesses that meet requirements for food safety practices. In keeping with its commitment to transparency and accountability, and as part of its Food Safety Program, OPH is proposing an added component to the existing online food safety inspection disclosure system, through a trial project called Ottawa Safe. Ottawa Safe will be an online resource where food premise inspection information (including enforcement action taken) will be available. The design of Ottawa Safe is to promote a better understanding of safe food practices to meet the needs of both residents and food premise operators. Provincial Context and Developments According to the Ontario Public Health Standards (OPHS) and the targets in the Public Health Funding and Accountability Agreement with the Board of Health, food premises classified as high-risk must receive a compliance inspection once every four months. Food premises classified as moderate-risk require a compliance inspection every six months. OPH has consistently met these targets. The OPHS require that low-risk food premises receive at least one inspection annually. In the past, OPH occasionally took longer than the prescribed 12 month period to inspect low-risk food premises on account of resource constraints and other demands. However, new approaches to increase collaboration with health promotion staff, reallocate staff, and the shift in risk assessments of food premises (outlined below), will ensure that OPH inspects all low-risk food premises each year. Risk assessments of food premises are conducted on-site on an annual basis by PHIs. In 2015, the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC) released a Guidance Document for the Risk Categorization of Food Premises for local health units to use in assessing risk at food premises. This new guidance tool outlines a standard approach to be used by all 36 local health units in Ontario for the prevention and reduction of food-borne illness in food premises and to support efficient allocation of Board of Health resources. Prior to the release of the new provincial guidelines, OPH s stringent standard to setting risk categories resulted in a relatively high number and proportion of high-risk premises in Ottawa compared to peer health units. The approach used by OPH prior to the new provincial guidelines required a large number of scheduled inspections and a significant demand on PHIs to meet inspection targets. With the new provincial guidance tool, a number of food premise risk categorizations have shifted, such that many high-risk

6 premises have been newly categorized as moderate-risk, and a number of premises previously considered moderate-risk are now low-risk. At the end of 2014 Ottawa had 1,448 food premises categorized as high-risk; and 2,200 as moderate risk. Currently in Ottawa, there are 1,048 food premises categorized as high-risk; 2,439 as moderate risk, and; 1,597 as low risk for a total of 5,884 food premises. These figures vary based on opening and closing of food premises, or change in risk status. The level or degree of risk can change based on inspection history, the nature of food preparation, volume of food produced, inherent food hazards and equipment and facility conditions. Factors such as a past history of good practice, independent audits of food safety practices and the presence of certified food handlers are now considered during the risk assessments. The new tool will make Public Health Funding and Accountability Agreement targets more attainable and support PHIs to spend time educating food premise operators and staff during inspections. DISCUSSION Local Context Next Phase of OPH Food Safety Program OPH will continue to advance its Food Safety Program through its three pillars: Education, Inspection, and Quality Assurance. Education Based on food industry feedback, and to maximize PHI resources, OPH will work to increase online enrolment in its provincially certified food handler training course, while maintaining in-person courses for priority populations. The roll-out of the proposed Ottawa Safe trial will be supported by new approaches to education of food premise staff to underscore the consistent and predictable nature of how food safety practices are recognized and upheld. OPH also issues seasonal messages and publications including Food Matters to promote food safety practices to the broader public on topics including safe defrosting methods and barbecues hazards. New interactive elements will be included in the implementation of the Ottawa Safe website to highlight the food safety practices promoted by OPH, and the significance of non-compliance with particular requirements. Ottawa Safe will serve as a resource to the public, with further information about how to safely prepare food at home.

7 Inspection The Food Safety Program has redesigned how work is divided across urban, sub-urban and rural regions in the city, to draw on teams of three to four PHIs that cross-cover each other in a district. This change is designed to promote increased consistency of inspection related decisions between PHIs. Quality Assurance Ongoing monitoring for quality assurance by OPH staff includes reviews to ensure food premise owners/operators understand OPH s approach, and that timeliness, accuracy and consistency are reflected in the posting of disclosure results. With the proposed rollout of Ottawa Safe, educational materials will be provided to food premise operators and staff to clearly explain expectations about how to achieve compliance with required food safety practices. OPH will set out what support is provided and what actions are taken when breaches are observed. Previously, food premises with repeat non-compliance have not been consistently flagged for escalated enforcement action. In 2014, Quality Assurance support to frontline PHIs aimed to maximize their use of current technologies, and development of new strategies and tools. Increased clarity, consistency, and transparency about enforcement actions to food premise operators, members of the public, and PHIs will now be available. Recommendation 1 - Approve the Ottawa Safe online trial project as part of the next phase of the Food Safety Program, as outlined in the report New Online Food Inspection Disclosure Trial Project Ottawa Safe The goal of shifting the current online food inspection disclosure system to the Ottawa Safe trial is to improve food safety standards, reduce the risk of food-borne illness, raise consumer awareness of food safety, and recognize businesses that consistently uphold food safety practices. Research shows disclosure systems can improve compliance with food safety legislation and enhance food safety standards in food business establishments i. The failure of a food premise operator to meet the required food safety standard is referred to as a deficiency. OPH s current system for disclosure of inspection information online uses only two categories of deficiencies to classify how food premises uphold food safety practices: in compliance or not in compliance. The current system will be enhanced to provide users with a clear understanding of the

8 significance of the non-compliance for health, and indication of the history of a food premises compliance. There are four types of deficiencies that have been developed under the OPH Food Safety Program related to meeting required food safety standards as outlined in Document 2. Using these categories will provide consumers and food premises with a better understanding of the significance of the deficiencies reported. OPH s current online disclosure system (OttawaRestaurantInspections.ca) displays food premise inspection results in English and French. Visitors to the website can search Ottawa food premises either by facility name or address to view the most recent inspections results. This information is used by patrons to make informed decisions on where they dine. OPH uploads inspection results shortly after they are completed. Inspection results remain on the website for two years. The site also features an online complaint/feedback form which OPH monitors regularly to ensure timely follow-up by a PHI. In 2014, OPH updated its disclosure website to be more easily accessible on users mobile devices. This change provided users with enhanced access to inspection reports to help them make informed decisions as well as introduced disclosure for personal services settings (such as tattoo, hair salons, aesthetic services, etc.) and recreational water inspections (including pools and spas). Since its implementation in 2014, OPH s updated food safety disclosure website has received approximately 47,380 hits. To inform the development of an online food safety inspection disclosure trial project that will better meet the needs of the public and food premise operators, OPH undertook a review of food inspection literature and disclosure systems across North America. As part of this process, OPH collected information about systems of disclosure of inspection information from peer Ontario health units. The review showed a variety of disclosure models are being used to communicate food safety inspection results, including: web-based displays of inspection results and green, yellow, red placards; A, B, C grading systems; and a two-tier pass/closed model, among others. The system of using red, yellow and green designations for different food premise inspection results is the most common in Ontario. While a number of jurisdictions have implemented systems using a similar user interface, there are marked differences among local health units in the supporting category definitions, infrastructure, philosophy, and cost. Trial Project Design Ottawa Safe

9 Ottawa Safe will recognize food premises that uphold all food safety requirements and differentiate between premises that do not comply with required food safety standards based on the level of risk to health associated with the deficiencies identified. Ottawa Safe will use a made-in-ottawa approach by using the four deficiency type classification scheme described in Document 2 of this report for each contravention of the food safety standards. Ottawa Safe will also present the results of food premise inspections using a colour coded red, yellow and green grading system. Green: Yellow: Red: Premise has been inspected and is approved for operation by OPH Premise has been inspected and is approved for operation by OPH, but enforcement action has been taken (including violation tickets orders under the Health Protection and Promotion Act, and/or court action) Premise has been closed by OPH and is not approved for operation The consistent application of OPH s enforcement policy, which focuses on repeat noncompliance for escalating legal action, will underlie the Ottawa Safe colour coded food safety disclosure system. The majority of food premises correct deficiencies identified in food safety practice when discovered on the spot and with education about the rationale for the practice. Therefore, the inspection results for most food premises are expected to be associated with a green rating as no enforcement action would have been taken by the PHI. Options for further recognition of businesses that consistently excel at complying with all food safety practices over repeated inspections are being explored. A small number of premises are expected to encounter ongoing challenges meeting food safety requirements and the addition of a yellow rating may be applied to their food premise inspection results. This may serve as an added incentive to improve their performance as yellow indicates legal action has been taken, which operators might be concerned will deter customers from visiting. As part of the new approach to disclosure, when PHIs determine that a food premise is highly suspected or confirmed to be the cause of a food-borne outbreak based on food samples, stool samples, and epidemiological evidence, OPH will post results of the outbreak investigation on its website. Historically, the number of suspected or confirmed food-borne outbreaks associated with a food premise has ranged between 3 to 5 a year. In summary, the Ottawa Safe online disclosure of food premise inspection information will incorporate four possible designations for each and every contravention of a food safety standard - health hazard deficiency, critical deficiency, semi-critical deficiency, and non-critical deficiency. In addition, each set of inspection results will be flagged red,

10 yellow, or green based on whether enforcement action was taken. Red will indicate that the PHI ordered that the premises be closed and will align with the PHI having noted at least one Health Hazard Deficiency. A yellow flagged inspection will indicate that the PHI took enforcement action short of requiring that the premises be closed and would typically arise as a result of a PHI issuing a ticket to an operator for failing to correct a deficiency that was noted during the previous inspection. Green flagged inspection will indicate that no enforcement action was taken, although the full inspection results that are posted may indicate one or more deficiencies were noted by the PHI at the time of the inspection. Implementation of Ottawa Safe With the Board s approval, OPH Food Safety Program staff and PHIs will make the necessary technological adjustments to begin to have inspection results reflected under the new categories with associated colours before the end of the 2015 calendar year. Costs will be accommodated within existing budgets. Prior to going live with the inspection report changes online, the look of the website will be tested with members of the Ottawa Restaurant Association and potential restaurant consumers and patrons. Before the launch of Ottawa Safe, OPH will send an educational information package to approximately 5,900 food premises by mail, as well as posting the information online, explaining the new approach, including the underlying consistent and predictable enforcement policy. The routine inspections that PHIs make will be used to further explain and educate food premise staff about the trial, and highlight how to provide feedback to OPH about the trial. Quality assurance processes will be used to ensure inspection results are accurate and the enforcement and disclosure is consistent and predictable. Communications Approach The online food disclosure trial project will be accompanied by complementary information package available online and through social media. This information package is designed to educate and engage the public and food premise operators on the enhanced Food Safety Program. In addition to the educational approach for food premise staff, and as noted above, the disclosure website will have new elements added aimed at the public for increasing their understanding of food safety practices, as well as the trial system of disclosure.

11 Between June December 2014, the current disclosure website received 27,462 hits. From January 2015 to present, the current website has received 18,803 hits. Further promotion of the site will be carried out through social media channels. Options to further highlight food premises with outstanding results over time will be explored with BIAs, Chambers of Commerce, and the Ottawa Restaurant Association. Evaluation of Ottawa Safe OPH will evaluate the Ottawa Safe trial against its goals as stated above, based on a one-year period, to ensure that all food premises have been inspected during the trial. All food premises will be given the opportunity to provide anonymous feedback about the system and its implications for their food safety practices and business. OPH will seek user feedback using online surveys located on the proposed Ottawa Safe website. The surveys will include measures to assess the clarity of information provided, such as whether the significance of different inspection results and the colours are easily understood. The survey will also seek to increase appreciation of safe food handling. The findings from these survey results will be further explored qualitatively using focus groups. OPH will assess compliance with required food safety practices, including whether the proportion of food premises with repeat non-compliance decreases, under the new system compared to the previous one. Attention will be paid to any impact on foodborne outbreaks associated with food premises, though they are small in number each year, as well as on food-borne illness in the population at large. OPH will monitor and assess the volume of use, and reach of Ottawa Safe through website metrics. Staff input will be sought regarding usability of the system and supporting tools, as well as any unforeseen impacts. Recommendation 2 - Direct staff to report back on the Food Safety Program, including the Ottawa Safe trial project in 2017 OPH will table an update report with its findings regarding the Ottawa Safe trial in 2017, along with any recommendations for further amendments to the disclosure of food premise inspection information, and the Food Safety Program as a whole. RURAL IMPLICATIONS There are no rural implications.

12 CONSULTATION The next phase of Ottawa Public Health s Food Safety Program, including Ottawa Safe, the online food inspection disclosure trial project, was informed by input from restaurant owners and operators, Business Improvement Associations, residents, and City of Ottawa partners. LEGAL IMPLICATIONS There are no legal impediments to implementing the recommendations in this report. The need to revise the current inspection website disclaimer and provide additional information on how to interpret online reports when the Ottawa Safe online trial project is implemented has been reviewed with Ottawa Public Health. RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS There are no risk implications associated with this report. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS There are no financial implications associated with this report. ACCESSIBILITY IMPACTS There are no accessibility implications to receiving this report.. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION DOCUMENT 1: Progress on Ottawa Public Health s Food Safety Programming DOCUMENT 2: Ottawa Public Health Types of Food Safety Inspection Deficiencies DISPOSITION Staff will implement Ottawa Safe, the online food inspection disclosure trial project, upon Board approval of the report recommendations. i Sylvanus Thompson, Ron de Burger, Olayemi Kadri, (2005) "The Toronto food inspection and disclosure system: A case study," British Food Journal, Vol. 107 Iss: 3, pp.140-149