Computation Advisory Committee (CAC) Call for Proposals 2007-2008. Campus-Wide Proposals that are Innovative



Similar documents
Institutional Data Management and Systems Acquisition

Proposal For. Upgrades for the. AG450 Lab Server

Table of Contents General Policy for service provided by the CLAS Linux Support team... 2

CENG Information Technology Services University of North Texas

Proposal For. Upgrades in the. AG450 Lab

Policy Statement. Policy

Student Technology Fee Income - FY Computer Fee Income Summary (includes summer 2011 distribution)

Campus Technology Planning Guidelines

IT Governance. Brandeis University Library & Technology Services. Committees... 2 One steering committee and three subcommittees are created.

Lehman College City University of New York Print Policy Effective Date: July 2, 2012

MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE. LITS Computer Replacement and Support Strategy for Faculty and Staff Computers

Laney Information Technology Services

TECHNOLOGY PLAN SUMMARY

ADMINISTRATIVE DATA MANAGEMENT AND ACCESS POLICY

Kennebec Valley Community College Information Technology Department Service Level Agreement

Cash Advance for International Operations

2) Switch to a personal phone and follow the guidance/procedures established by the University for the Communication Technology Allowance.

STUDENT TECHNOLOGY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM PLAN

Planning and Budgeting for Capital Projects and Other Capital Items at Vassar

How To Improve Your Career At Csu, Chico

Internship Graphic Design

CSG Windows Support Policy

Computer Use Policy Approved by the Ohio Wesleyan University Faculty: March 24, 2014

Penn State University IT Assessment. Opportunity Analysis - Advisory Committee March 30, 2011

H:\Documents\Management\Planning\Planned Rotation\UWEC Desktop Hardware & Software Rotation Policy doc Page 1 of 12 UWEC Computer Hardware &

Information Technology Services

University of Massachusetts Medical School

The Pennsylvania State University IT Assessment Executive Summary

IT Governance Action Team Report & Recommendations

Hamilton Campus. Information Technology Strategic Project Plan

Administrative or Research Faculty Job Description. Position Title Requested: Assistant Director for Residence Life of Housing Operations

Unit Specific Questions Administrative

Graduate Student Handbook

simplify the University s relationship with telecommunications vendors;

Appropriate Use of Campus Computing and Network Resources

Information Technology Plan Technology Vision for the Community College

BYOD Strategy (Service Mobility) 2014

Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Policy Revised: April 2012

Instructional Technology Course Materials and Service Fee

Continuity Planning and Disaster Recovery

Blackboard Policies and Procedures for Coastal Carolina University. November 2011 TEAL Center

Los Angeles City College Associated Student Government Club Council! HOW TO CHARTER A CLUB

Integrated Technology Plan (FY10 FY12)

Policies of the University of North Texas

Information Technology User Policy 10/31/13

SCHOOL AND DISTRICT TECHNOLOGY USAGE

APPENDIX E ALLOWABLE CAPITAL EXPENDITURE GUIDELINES

ADVANCED NURSING PROJECT & COMPREHENSIVE EXAM PROCEDURES

SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT. between. THE END USERS OF CHESPEAKE COLLEGE At Wye Mills (Represented by the Technology Planning Group) and

Law College Computer and Technology Information

Student Tech Guide. Get Connected with Information and Technology Services. link.mnsu.edu/studenttech. Big ideas. Real-world thinking.

Florida Agricultural & Mechanical University Board of Trustees Policy

Del Mar College Job Description. Chief Information Technology Officer FLSA Status: Exempt. Position # Prepared: October 2006

APPENDIX I.A. Alignment of ISTE National Educational Technology Standards with Proposed Programs

GRADUATE SCHOOL AND CONTINUING EDUCATION OFFICE OF THE DEAN

MASTER SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT (MSLA)

IT Master Plan Executive Summary

Palm Beach State College. Information Technology. Service Level Agreement

III. RESPONSIBILITIES

OFFICE OF THE VICE CHANCELLOR FOR ACADEMIC AFFAIRS. OFFICE OF THE DEAN Org Code: MADNEG

UW-L Information Technology Services Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

DELAWARE CENTER FOR EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY

University Policy No.: AC1135 Classification: Academic and Students

Policy & Procedures Help Desk Service Level Agreement (SLA)

Administrative Policy Title: Scheduling Policy, Classroom and Other Spaces, CU Denver Buildings/Spaces

VVC Technology & Information Resources Catalog of Services

DESKTOP SUPPORT SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT

1.1.1 Computer Hardware Provision Policy

COMPUTER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES

KECK SCHOOL OF MEDICINE GOVERNANCE DOCUMENT June 20, 2011

Research IT Governance Handbook

BYLAWS of the Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences

NORTH TEXAS NURSING RESOURCE CENTER. Operations Manual for the Centralized Clinical Placement System and the Centralized Faculty Resource Center

Brown University Patent and Invention Policy and Copyright Policy

Each year, the GSA puts out a call for Quality Money proposals in order to solicit proposals from interested parties across the university.

School of Engineering Local Services Printing Service Level Agreement ITS. The Jack Baskin School of Engineering

WSU Vancouver Information Technology Service Catalog

University of Pennsylvania Handbook for Faculty and Academic Administrators 2015 Version

Microsoft Agreement FAQ

Computing Services Helpdesk

Information Technology Strategic Plan

Information Technology IT Support

ITS Budget Request Process

FY15 UW-Parkside Institutional IT Plan Report

Departmental On-Site Computing Support (DOCS) Server Support SLA

UF ONLINE ANNUAL REPORT Submitted July 21, 2014 by the Advisory Board for UF Online

PRESENTATION OF INTERNAL AUDIT SERVICES DAVIS CAMPUS. Rick Catalano Director, Internal Audit Services January 2009

DIVISION OF ENGINEERING COMPUTING SERVICES DECS SERVICE DESK. Fall & Spring: Monday Thursday 8am to 9pm. Summer & Breaks:

University of Maryland, Baltimore Effort Reporting Policy Statements

Nursing Student Council of the College of Nursing, SUNY Health Science Center at Brooklyn Constitution ARTICLE I NAME

Nomination and Selection of External Consultants for Graduate Program Reviews

Marist College. Information Security Policy

STUDENT ACTIVITIES STUDENT ORGANIZATION ANNUAL CERTIFICATION PACKET

UC Irvine Information Technology Consolidation. Dana Roode UCI Office of Information Technology July 8, 2010 (updated 7/2012)

Indiana University of Pennsylvania Information Assurance Guidelines. Approved by the Technology Utilities Council 27-SEP-2002

Office of the President University Policy

Planning and Budget Process

NUTS and BOLTS of Daily Survival at Work

Transcription:

Computation Advisory Committee (CAC) Call for Proposals 2007-2008 Campus-Wide Proposals that are Innovative The university-wide student computer fee was established to provide improved computer facilities throughout the university, to stimulate the use of computer-based instruction and to help place Iowa State University on the forefront of computer-based instruction. The focus of this annual call is projects that have a broad impact on student computing and represent innovative uses of technology on the Iowa State University campus. Additional innovative projects will be funded that are focused on student instruction but have inadequate funding from other sources of student computer fees and are deemed worthy of financial support. This document is a CALL FOR PROPOSALS that address university needs for computer-based instructional support from Central Pool funds. Total funds in the Central Pool for competitive proposals are anticipated to be approximately $700,000 for 2007-2008. Central Pool Projects Supported All expenditures of student computer fees, including proposals in response to this call for proposals, are expected to conform to the Guidelines for Appropriate Expenditure of Income from the Student Computer Fee, which is attached to the end of this document. Multiple year projects may be considered. Budgets for multiple year projects should include annual budgets for each year of the project. If multiple year projects are funded, the complete budget will be charged against the total amount awarded for the current year. In all cases, funds are held by CAC until they are expended. Allowable expenditures for proposals that have been funded through the Central Pool in past years have been more restrictive than the Guidelines for Appropriate Expenditure of Income from the Student Computer Fee and are identified in the chart below.

Expenditures Supported Proposals have been supported for: A. Purchase of Information Technology hardware and software, for example, desktop computers, PDAs, wireless devices, etc. B. Upgrading costs for hardware and software. C. Expenditures for security and protection against loss of computer equipment. Expenditures NOT Supported These items have not been supported: A. Recurring hardware maintenance beyond the project duration. B. Personnel directly involved with software assistance and hardware maintenance (e.g., lab monitors). C. Expendable supplies (e.g., paper, ribbons, tape, diskettes). D. Recurring Telecommunications costs beyond the project duration. CAC will use the following four-tier priority system as a guide to evaluate proposals. 1 st priority - campus-wide proposals addressing student needs for campus computing capability 2 nd priority - innovative proposals with student involvement 3 rd priority - upgrading existing open access facilities 4 th priority - creating new general purpose computer laboratories Proposal Procedure Proposals may originate from students, faculty or staff but must be connected to an administrative unit of the university. It is expected that campus-wide proposals will come from a collaboration of several units. In this case, each administrative office will include the campus-wide proposal in its prioritized list submitted to CAC. Groups of students with a faculty advisor are encouraged to submit proposals. All proposals must come to CAC after being submitted for prioritization to the major administrative office to which the unit reports. Academic departments must submit their proposals through their Dean; units reporting directly to a vice president must submit their proposals through the office of that vice president; others should contact the Chair of the Computation Advisory Committee, Philip Spike, (E-mail: plspike@iastate.edu, Voice: 294-6030) to discuss procedures for submitting a proposal. Projects which involve a joint effort or cost sharing between two or more units must be submitted as a single proposal. All projects must be headed by a single project leader 2

(ISU faculty or staff) while student submitted proposals may include a student leader in addition to a faculty or staff leader. All administrative offices whose units are involved in a joint project should review and prioritize the proposal. Schedule 1. Individual proposals should be submitted to the college or other appropriate administrative office for review by Friday, February 23, 2007 unless another date has been specified by the reviewing office. 2. College or similar computation advisory committees are asked to comment upon and prioritize all proposals when such an advisory committee exists. 3. The Deans or administrative officers are asked to comment upon and prioritize all proposals. 4. The Deans or administrative officers must forward all proposals, comments and prioritized lists to the Chair, Computation Advisory Committee, 271 Durham Center, no later than Friday, March 9, 2007. 5. CAC will review the proposals and make recommendations for funding. 6. The chair of the CAC will forward these recommendations to the CIO and Provost for approval. 7. It is anticipated that awards will be announced by May 18, 2007. 8. Project funds will be available for expenditure from the date of announcement until June 30, 2008 (or later for projects approved as multiple year projects). 9. The project leader is responsible for submitting a project report detailing the expenditure of funds and how the project met its goals and objectives by September 1, 2008. Multiple year projects are expected to submit annual reports until project expenditures are concluded. Evaluation Criteria Central Pool funds are intended to benefit the general instructional program and environment at Iowa State University. Evaluations of proposals will be based on the following criteria: 1. General Student Benefit: For proposals to qualify as a campus-wide proposal, the proposal must clearly identify how the project will benefit the general student body. Proposals are encouraged to include evidence of student interest and support for the project. Although some students may benefit more than others from a proposed project, the 3

facilities and services funded through the Central Pool must be available to the general student body or be in direct support of general student computing activities to an extent commensurate with contributions from the Central Pool. Priority will be given to services and facilities that support general use, have convenient access and are available to the general student body for a minimum of 30 hours per week or provide models of innovative uses of information technology for students that can be replicated by others. 2. Innovation: For proposals to qualify for campus-wide proposals, the proposal must clearly identify how the project will be innovative for the university. Proposed projects should include innovative means to provide Information Technology access and capability for Iowa State University students. The central pool funding system is designed to encourage both students and faculty to implement state-of-the art computing opportunities for students. 3. Contribution to Instructional Program: Student computer fees were initiated to stimulate the use of computer-based and computer supported instruction and to help place Iowa State University on the forefront of computer-based and computer supported instruction. All funded proposals must clearly identify how the project will benefit the instructional program at Iowa State University. 4. Cost Efficiency: Preferred consideration will be given to proposals that provide the greatest benefit to the instructional program and environment at ISU for the least cost. Cost efficiency may result from efficient design, cost sharing, or other approaches that maximize the effect of Central Pool expenditures. The expected benefit of a proposal will be evaluated in terms of general student access to Information Technology and the value of that access to the general instructional program at ISU. 5. Integration with Existing Facilities: Project proposals should clearly identify how the proposed project will integrate with existing university facilities. Examples of integration into existing university facilities include: a. CAC funded computers have connectivity to the campus network. b. Students login with their NetID and can access campus-wide file and print resources. 4

c. CAC funded computers have the following software suite installed: Microsoft Office licensed through the Microsoft Campus Agreement JMP for statistical analysis Web browsers with browser plug-ins Terminal emulation software & file transfer software Virus protection software d. The purchased computers conform to the university Desktop Standards policy found at: http://www.it.iastate.edu/policies/standards/. e. The facilities were designed with handicapped accessibility and basic ergonomic principles in mind. Proposal Preparation People preparing proposals should first contact the administrative unit (for example your college dean, Vice President for Business and Finance, etc.) through which they plan to submit their proposal and obtain deadlines (Feb 24, 2007 is suggested as an administrative unit deadline). Only one prioritized set of proposals will be accepted from these administrative units. Individual proposals which have not been reviewed in their administrative unit will not be accepted. Samples of successful proposals from previous years are available through College CACs and on the CAC web-site (www.iastate.edu/cac). Administrative units should submit by Friday, March 9, 2007: one signed hard copy of their prioritized set of proposals to the Chair of the CAC in 271 Durham Center and one electronic copy. The electronic copy may be included with the signed copy or forwarded electronically to the chair and assistant of CAC at admincac@iastate.edu. Questions should be directed to the Chair of the CAC by voice at 294-6030 or e-mail at plspike@iastate.edu. Proposals should be short, concise and in the following outline format. Proposals that do not comply with the preparation instructions will be returned and not evaluated. 5

Proposal Format I. Cover Page A. Title of project (Descriptive title in 15 words or less). B. Indicate which CAC priorities this proposal addresses (see page 2). C. Name of proposer/proposing unit. D. College(s) or other administrative unit(s) that is/are responsible for reviewing the proposal. E. Signatures of participants (students, faculty and staff) and appropriate administrators. F. Name, phone number and e-mail address of the project leader(s) (student led projects must include a faculty/staff leader in addition to the student leader). II. Project Overview and Expected Benefit (Please limit to two pages plus appendix) Describe the proposed project in general terms. Describe how the project will provide general student benefit at Iowa State. Describe the innovative features of the proposal. Describe the expected benefit to the instructional program or environment at ISU. Describe any cost efficiency designed into the proposal. Describe how the proposed project will integrate with the existing facilities, computer environment, computer systems and computer network at ISU. The following points should be addressed: A. Description and intended purpose for all project expenditures. Identify requested expenditures from Central Pool funds. B. How will the proposed facilities or services will be made available to students? Specific details are required. 1. Specify the hours when this facility or service will be available for general student use. 2. Identify the number of students that will be able to use the facility or be served simultaneously during these hours. 3. Identify the student population(s) that should benefit from this proposal. Estimate the number of students to be served. 6

4. If the proposal involves the development of an innovative model, indicate how this model will be disseminated to others at Iowa State. C. If the proposed project requires special new technologies, describe how these requirements will be met. D. Identify university facilities that would be needed for the proposed project. Specify the building(s) and room number. A scaled sketch of the floor plan showing the location of equipment should be appended for public computing facilities. III. Support and Maintenance Support for recurring costs beyond the term of this project will not be supported through Central Pool funding. Identify how the anticipated costs for support and maintenance will be covered after the termination of this project. IV. Budget A. Prepare a table similar to Table 1 to identify the costs and proposed source of funding for hardware, software, personnel and other materials needed for the proposed project. Include the unit price, quantity, total price and the source of funding for each item. Calculate the total amount requested. Proposal authors may consult with Mike Bowman (294-2588 or mbowman@iastate.edu) on questions concerning technical aspects of their proposals. B. Because funding recommendations will be limited to the items in the budget, please make the budget complete. Minor budget adjustments may be approved but significant changes involving the size or scope of the project will normally require a complete committee review. Total expenditures shall not exceed the total amount approved for a project without a complete review by the Computation Advisory Committee (CAC). C. All or part of a proposal may be funded. Prepare a table similar to Table 2 to identify a minimum funding level that is needed for a project to be feasible. Further identification of additional funding increments that would be feasible will help the reviewers allocate available resources to the greatest benefit of Iowa State University. 7

Table 1. Full Itemized Budget (Costs for the Entire Project) Description of Item Number Unit cost Total Cost by Funding Source Hardware Software Other Central Pool Other (Specify) Total Table 2. Minimum Feasible Itemized Budget (Costs for Minimum Feasible Part of the Project) Description of Item Number Unit cost Total Cost by Funding Source Hardware Software Other Central Pool Other (Specify) Total 8

Appendix Guidelines for Appropriate Expenditure of Income from the Student Computer Fee Approved by Computation Advisory Committee, CAC, on May 9, 1991 Amended on November 19, 1993, March 7, 1996 and December 1, 2005 These guidelines apply to the use of all student computer fee funds (Central Pool, College Pool, or any other funds supported by student computer fees). The expectation is that committees with half of their members consisting of Iowa State students establish priorities and make decisions about the expenditure of student computer fees. The Computation Advisory Committee, CAC, should be consulted for interpretation of these guidelines or the perceived need for revisions of these guidelines. I. USE CATEGORIES A. The types of uses deemed to be supportable are: 1. Information technology resources for all Iowa State University students. 2. Information technology resources by faculty and staff (provided that such use is directly related to instruction). B. The types of uses deemed inappropriate for support are: 1. Sponsored research and consulting by students, faculty or staff. 2. Unsponsored research or consulting by faculty or staff. 3. Staff work not directly related to instruction. 4. Construction and renovation of physical facilities, including furniture and wiring. 5. Purchase of major information technology equipment (greater than $25K per system) without consultation with CAC. 6. Personnel on appointments exceeding two years. II. EXPENDITURE CATEGORIES (intended principally for the supportable uses listed in section IA) A. HARDWARE Purchase, maintenance, replacements or upgrades of university-owned equipment B. SOFTWARE Purchase, maintenance, replacements or upgrades for university-owned machines and/or site licenses C. EXPENDABLE SUPPLIES (e.g., paper, toner, media, etc.) D. STUDENT ACCESS TO NETWORKS E. SECURITY AND PROTECTION against loss through theft of computers and computer peripherals (e.g. tie downs, special door locks, video surveillance systems, and payment of insurance premiums) F. SUPPORT PERSONNEL directly involved with hardware/software assistance and maintenance (e.g. lab monitors) G. PERSONNEL INVOLVED IN COURSE DEVELOPMENT as deemed appropriate by the colleges and departments for courses that make use of information technology resources. These expenditures may be for all Iowa State University student support, Information Technology Services personnel support, and general support costs (which may include expenditures to foster and promote course development). H. OTHER SERVICES or FEES related to the use of information technology for class development or delivery.