Perth and Kinross Council Development Control Committee 18 March 2009 Recommendation by Development Quality Manager



Similar documents
Application No. 12/00349/FUL Ward: Longbridge. 33 Faircross Parade, Longbridge Road, Barking

Manchester City Council Item 6 Planning and Highways Committee 8 May 2014

73 MAIN STREET SHIRLEY SOLIHULL

3. The consent hereby granted does not include any external alterations.

Development Management Report

K M D Hire Services, LONDON ROAD, NANTWICH, CW5 6LU

THE ROYAL BOROUGH OF KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE 16/06/2015

K M D Hire Services, LONDON ROAD, NANTWICH, CW5 6LU

The land is allocated within the Westbury on Trym Conservation Area and the land is protected by a blanket TPO 340.

1.1 The application property is an extended two-storey semi-detached house fronting Bedale Road. The side garden adjoins a link road to Wydale Road.

Relevant Planning History P/2006/1070: Demolition of building and construction of supermarket and 14 2 bed flats. Withdrawn.

PLANNING APPLICATION: 12/00056/APP

Home Office, Home Occupation and Home Business

Orchard Barn, Newcastle Road, Blakelow, Cheshire, CW5 7ET. New Detached Double Garage Block with Integrated Garden Store and Loft Storage Area.

Technical Advice Note: Retail Impact Assessments

21 Plumbers Row, London, E1 1EQ

No colour scheme has been specified for the painting of the hardwood.

Design and Access Statement Earls Court Road London SW5 9RH

Manchester City Council List Item 10 Planning and Highways Committee 15 March 2012

APPLICATION NO. 15/P/00168 RECEIVED: 27-Mar Change of use of shop to residential flat (first floor) and shop alterations

Long Ditton Ward: Alex King Expiry Date: 24/03/2010 Location:

Page 117. DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE - Date:1 September Report of the Executive Head of Planning and Transportation.

Reference: 05/00928/FUL Officer: Mr David Jeanes

74 Rivington Street. Planning Statement JULY 2013 DP Pall Mall. London SW1Y 5NQ. Tel: Fax:

Development proposals will require to demonstrate, according to scale, type and location, that they:-

Development Management Officer Report Committee Application. Summary

Manchester City Council Planning and Highways Committee 2 June 2011

R&S. August 2014 Prepared by RandS Associated Srl. 1. Introduction

Site Deliverability Statement Development at: Beech Lane, Kislingbury. Persimmon Homes Midlands March 2015

Planning Statement. GARDEN HOUSE, MATTERSEY ROAD, EVERTON, DONCASTE DN10 5BN PHONE: MOBILE e mail

Decision Due Date: 15 April Site visit date: 12 & 25 March 2015

FULL APPLICATION FOR ERECTION OF GARAGE MAINTENANCE UNIT AND PORTABLE OFFICE CABIN

Report To: The Planning Board Date: 2 April Report By: Head of Regeneration and Planning Report No: 14/0023/IC

Report to Planning applications committee Item Date 6 March 2014 Head of planning services

Date: 9 July Development Management planning application: Application 13/AP/0277 for: Full Planning Permission

21.04 LAND USE. Managing amenity through land use strategies

Development Control Committee 12 March, 2015 WD/D/14/ ITEM NUMBER 6

DEVELOPMENT BRIEF FOR LAND AT ALLOA ROAD, TULLIBODY

KINGSTON TOWN PLANNING SUB-COMMITTEE 23 MARCH YELLOW BOX STORAGE , LONDON ROAD AND 50, GORDON ROAD, Application Number: 05/12156

Planning Technical Advice Note: Waste bin storage and access requirements for new and change of use developments

Camden Development Policies

CITY OF SUBIACO. PLANNING POLICY 1.4 (September 2013) PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF PLANNING PROPOSALS

Change of use of an existing vacant office building to a Bed & Breakfast Guest House (Use Class C1) with proprietor's accommodation.

Planning & Building Control Division. Development. East Ayrshire Planning. Design Guidance

Department for Communities and Local Government

PLANNING SUPPORT STATEMENT. 29 Fernshaw Road, London SW10 0TG MRS. GAIL TAYLOR & MRS. KAREN HOWES. Prepared For TR/6570

1327 Stratford Road, Hall Green, Birmingham, B28 9HH

THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 Grant of Planning Permission

Shannon Corner Service Centre, Burlington Road, New Malden, KT3 4NP

EAST AYRSHIRE COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE: 16 MAY /0237/PP REPLACEMENT WINDOWS AND INSTALLATION OF COMFORT COOLING CONDENSERS

Decision Due Date: 18 April 2015

4 Alternatives and Design Evolution

Local Development Framework. Hot Food Takeaway Supplementary Planning Document. abcde. Adopted March 2009

Erection of replacement warehouse building and erection of two buildings in connection with builder s merchants

Supplementary Guidance Stiùireadh Leasachail. Managing Waste in New Developments A Stiùireadh Sgudal ann an Leasachaidhean Ùra

POLICY DP6 Mitigating the impacts of development

Introduction. Welcome London Road, Mitcham

Aztech Architecture Your Guide to Overshadowing, Daylight & Sunlight. 1 P age

Design & Access Statement : Proposed Internal Devlopment & External Plant to Data Centre Facility, 35 Imperial Way, Croydon.

A Guide to Pre-Application Advice and Fees and Planning Performance Agreements

13 Oakleigh Gardens London N20 9AB

HARROGATE BOROUGH COUNCIL

3.4 PROPOSED CHANGE OF USE TO RESTAURANT WITH ALFRESCO - LOT 465 (STRATA UNIT 1, NO.104) SWAN STREET, GUILDFORD (DA510-15)

Welcome Welcome to the public exhibition for development at Bowman Field. This exhibition provides an overview of the proposals for the site.

Palmer Street/Great Barr Street, (former MacDermid warehouse), Digbeth, Birmingham, B9 4AY

7-8 Waterloo Street, City Centre, Birmingham, B2 5PQ

713 Finchley Road London NW11 8DH

LONDON BOROUGH OF TOWER HAMLETS MINUTES OF THE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE HELD AT 7.30 P.M. ON WEDNESDAY, 22 AUGUST 2007

Exempted Development - Frequently Asked Questions

SANDRIDGE. Application in the FBURA.

EDIN BVRGH + DM Guideline: Transport Requirements - Developer Contributions Guideline. Item no. Planning Committee 4 October Purpose of report

LEWES DISTRICT AND SOUTH DOWNS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY LEWES DISTRICT JOINT CORE STRATEGY INDEPENDENT EXAMINATION


Procedural Guide. Planning appeals - England

1 To review the office market in Bakewell in the light of pressures for change from office to residential in town centre sites.

VALIDATION REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANNING APPLICATIONS

DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT

Design Guidance for Perimeter Fencing at Schools for Nottinghamshire County Council

Ward: Purley DELEGATED BUSINESS MEETING Lead Officer: Head of Planning Control week of 23/03/2009

Guidance on Non-Material Amendments and Minor Material Amendments

Supplementary Planning Document. Radlett. District Centre Key Locations. Planning brief. March Hertsmere Borough Council

AGENT(S) / APPLICANT(S): AGENT Dave Dickerson, DK Architects. APPLICANT Halton Housing Trust. DEVELOPMENT PLAN ALLOCATION: Greenspace.

Advice can also be sought from specific specialist officers in the Council.

Proposed Sports Hall at. Oldfield School. Kelston Road. Bath BA1 9AB. Construction Management Plan June 2011

HurlinghamRetailPark. Aerial view of site. Welcome to our exhibition of proposals for the redevelopment of the Hurlingham Retail Park.

Transcription:

Perth and Kinross Council Development Control Committee 18 March 2009 Recommendation by Development Quality Manager 4(9) 09/161 Alteration and Extension to Existing Public House to Provide a New Bookmakers Outlet at Welcome Inn, 221 Rannoch Road, Perth PH1 2DP Ref. No: 08/02337/FUL Ward No: 11 Perth City North Summary This report refers to a planning application for commercial development within an existing neighbourhood shopping centre and is recommended for approval. BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION 1. The Welcome Inn public house occupies the ground floor of a modern L shaped building within the Letham neighbourhood centre. It has a corner location at the junction of Rannoch Road and Dalreoch Place, adjacent to the shopping parade, with housing opposite. There is a flat above the pub and a single-storey adjunct on the east side, in separate occupancy, which is used as a restaurant/hot-food shop The restaurant fronts a small parking court within the curtilage of the building, which is accessed from Dalreoch Place. 2. Detailed consent is sought for a single-storey extension to the building to be used as a betting office. This will wrap around the public house occupying the land currently used for parking. It has a gross footprint area of 148sqm and involves utilising part of the existing public house floorspace. The design of the extension is relatively plain and, as such, complimentary to the existing building. Other aspects of the scheme involve the erection of a porch at the new entrance to the pub and an expansion of the beer garden on the west side of the building NATIONAL POLICY AND GUIDANCE 3. No relevant Guidance DEVELOPMENT PLAN Perth and Kinross Structure Plan 2003 4. There are no strategic issues Perth Area Local Plan 1995 147

5. The principle relevant policies are in summary: - 6. Shopping General Policies Policy 47 refers to neighbourhood shopping centres and states that within such areas changes of use away from retailing will be discouraged. 7. Roads and Transport General Policies Policy 65 states that adequate parking provision should be made for new development in accordance with the Council s standards. Draft Perth Area/Central Area Local Plan 2004 8. The principle relevant policies are in summary: - 9. Policy 19 identifies neighbourhood shopping centres where uses within class 2 of the Use Classes Order are considered acceptable, i.e. financial professional and other services which include use as a betting shop. OTHER KEY POLICIES 10. None SITE HISTORY 11. There is no planning history relating the application site. CONSULTATIONS 12. Scottish Water has no objections. 13. The Environmental Health Manager has no objections subject to appropriate conditions. REPRESENTATIONS 14. A total of thirteen representations have been received from local residents, local businesses as well as the Minister of St Mark s Church and the Headmistress of Letham PS. In addition a petition containing some 160 signatures has been submitted. The main points of concern are as follows:- The site should be put to more beneficial use for the community. The proposal would cause an increase in anti-social behaviour in the area. A betting shop is not an appropriate use within a residential area and would be detrimental to the amenity of adjacent dwellings. 148

The development would result in loss of already limited parking space and cause further congestion. The location of the proposed betting office, directly in front of an existing restaurant would have an adverse impact on that business. 15. Some of these issues are not material planning matters but will be dealt by the licensing board in due course. Those points which are material to land use planning, namely car parking and residential amenity, are discussed below. APPRAISAL 16. The main planning issues raised by this proposal are as follows:- Policy 17. The land use policy framework identifies the site as lying within a neighbourhood shopping centre where retailing will remain the predominant use but encouragement will be given to other complimentary uses which assist in achieving the policy objective of maintaining the vitality and viability of such centres. Since the proposal would not result in the loss of any retail floorspace and is likely to have a spin off benefit for existing shops, then I consider that it complies with the relevant policy. Traffic 18. Given the location of the site adjacent to a public house and shopping centre, the development is unlikely to generate significant additional parking demand. Although a small number of spaces would be displaced to accommodate the new building these can be readily absorbed by existing on and off street parking provision in the area. The parking arrangements are therefore considered to be acceptable. Residential Amenity 19. The shopping centre on Rannoch Road is surrounded by residential property and there are flats opposite the public house/restaurant premises. It is considered unlikely however that the introduction of a betting office would cause a significant increase in the level of noise or activity emanating from the site. This is more likely to be caused by the extension to the beer garden but that can be regulated by appropriate conditions. Given that the surrounding residential properties adjoin a local centre therefore in my view the proposed development would not, in itself, be detrimental to the residential amenities of the area. 149

Design and Layout 20. In architectural terms this is a relatively modest building of single storey scale which, although prominent, would not look out of place in the street scene. The development could in fact benefit the townscape by providing some visual interest at a rather non-descript corner and, thereby, promoting a sense of place. I am aware that there is local concern about the physical relationship between the proposal and adjacent uses but this works satisfactorily in site planning terms as regards access and servicing. I have no concerns regarding alterations to the existing public house. REPRESENTATIONS 21. All of the issues raised in the representations which are relevant to planning consideration are covered elsewhere in this section. As already explained, the other issues such as anti-social behaviour are not material planning issues. CONCLUSION 22. The proposal is compatible with the character of this commercial area and represents a logical addition to the existing mix of uses within the neighbourhood centre. While there have been number of objections to this application, these largely relate to issues that would be more appropriately dealt with by the Licensing Authority. Those considerations which are relevant to planning, namely land use, access, parking and detailed design have been satisfied in my view. I conclude therefore that the proposal conforms to the relevant Local Plan Policies. RECOMMENDATION A Approve the application subject to the following conditions: 1. The development shall be commenced within a period of five years from the date of this consent. 2. The proposed must be carried out in accordance with the approved plans herewith, unless provided for by conditions imposed on the planning consent. 3. All external finishes shall match the existing building in type, colour and texture to the satisfaction of the Planning Authority. 4. The use of the betting office premises shall fall within class 2 of the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes)(Scotland) Order 1997 i.e. Financial Professional and Other Services. 5. All plant or equipment including any ventilation system shall be so enclosed, attenuated and maintained such that any noise therefrom shall not exceed 150

International Standards Organisation (ISO) Noise Rating 35 between 0700 and 2300 hours daily or Noise Rating 20 between 2300 and 0700 hours daily within any neighbouring residential property, to the satisfaction of the Planning Authority. 6. The soundproofing of the premises and the control of all amplified sound shall be such that no amplified sound is audible within any nearby residential property. 7. No music amplified or otherwise shall be permitted outside the premises and efforts must be made to minimise the impact of noise from inside the premises. 8. The hours of operation of the beer garden shall be restricted to 1130 to 2200 hours daily. 9. An effective ventilation system commensurate with the nature and scale of cooking to be undertaken shall be installed operated and maintained such that cooking odours are not exhausted into nor escape into any nearby residential property, to the satisfaction of the Planning Authority. Reasons 1. In accordance with the terms of Section 58 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997. 2. To ensure that the development is carried out in accordance with the approved plans. 3. In order to safeguard the visual amenities of the area. 4. In order that the Planning Authority may retain proper control over the development. 5-9. In order to safeguard the residential amenity of the area. Background Papers 13 letters of objection were submitted Case Officer Brian Dunkin ext 75354 Date 23 February 2009 Nick Brian Development Quality Manager 151

152

153

154