Bearing Capacity (Daya Dukung Tanah)



Similar documents
FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FORMULAS. A handy reference for use in geotechnical analysis and design

How To Model A Shallow Foundation

CE 366 SETTLEMENT (Problems & Solutions)

13. AN INTRODUCTION TO FOUNDATION ENGINEERING

Worked Example 2 (Version 1) Design of concrete cantilever retaining walls to resist earthquake loading for residential sites

VERTICAL STRESS INCREASES IN SOIL TYPES OF LOADING. Point Loads (P) Line Loads (q/unit length) Examples: - Posts. Examples: - Railroad track

ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design

Earth Pressure and Retaining Wall Basics for Non-Geotechnical Engineers

ESTIMATION OF UNDRAINED SETTLEMENT OF SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS ON LONDON CLAY

PILE FOUNDATIONS FM 5-134

vulcanhammer.net This document downloaded from

Program COLANY Stone Columns Settlement Analysis. User Manual

Module 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS

BEARING CAPACITY AND SETTLEMENT RESPONSE OF RAFT FOUNDATION ON SAND USING STANDARD PENETRATION TEST METHOD

System. Stability. Security. Integrity. 150 Helical Anchor

4.3 Results Drained Conditions Undrained Conditions References Data Files Undrained Analysis of

PDHonline Course S151A (1 PDH) Steel Sheet Piling. Instructor: Matthew Stuart, PE, SE. PDH Online PDH Center

EN Eurocode 7. Section 10 Hydraulic Failure Section 11 Overall Stability Section 12 Embankments. Trevor L.L. Orr Trinity College Dublin Ireland

Lecture 4. Case Study of 16 th C Church in Old Goa

INDIRECT METHODS SOUNDING OR PENETRATION TESTS. Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode

EXAMPLE 1 DESIGN OF CANTILEVERED WALL, GRANULAR SOIL

DESIGN, INSTALLATION AND TESTING OF HELICAL PILES & ANCHORS. Presented by: Donald A. Deardorff, P.E. CHANCE Civil Construction Centralia, MO USA

K x ' Retaining. Walls ENCE 461. Foundation Analysis and Design. Mohr s Circle. and Lateral Earth. Pressures. Lateral Earth Pressure.

Geotechnical Investigation Test Report

Designed and Engineered to Perform

Soil Mechanics. Soil Mechanics

REINFORCED CONCRETE. Reinforced Concrete Design. A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition. Walls are generally used to provide lateral support for:

ENGINEERING SCIENCE H1 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 3 BENDING MOMENTS EDEXCEL HNC/D ENGINEERING SCIENCE LEVEL 4 H1 FORMERLY UNIT 21718P

Appendix A Sub surface displacements around excavations Data presented in Xdisp sample file

Estimation of Adjacent Building Settlement During Drilling of Urban Tunnels

DIRECT SHEAR TEST SOIL MECHANICS SOIL MECHANICS LABORATORY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF MORATUWA SRI LANKA

Geotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

Effect of Gradation on Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Reinforced Sand

CEEN Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory Session 7 - Direct Shear and Unconfined Compression Tests

Settlement of Precast Culverts Under High Fills; The Influence of Construction Sequence and Structural Effects of Longitudinal Strains

A N Beal EARTH RETAINING STRUCTURES - worked examples 1

Module 7 (Lecture 24 to 28) RETAINING WALLS

PART TWO GEOSYNTHETIC SOIL REINFORCEMENT. Martin Street Improvements, Fredonia, Wisconsin; Keystone Compac Hewnstone

MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL 2 SHEAR FORCE AND BENDING MOMENTS IN BEAMS

Stability. Security. Integrity.

CHAPTER 9 FEM MODELING OF SOIL-SHEET PILE WALL INTERACTION

STRUCTURES Excavation and backfill for structures should conform to the topic EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL.

product manual HS-4210 HS-4210_MAN_09.08 Digital Static Cone Penetrometer

Period #16: Soil Compressibility and Consolidation (II)

Dimensional and Structural Data for Elliptical Pipes. PD 26 rev D 21/09/05

USE OF CONE PENETRATION TEST IN PILE DESIGN

SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS Lesson 08

Figure A-1. Figure A-2. continued on next page... HPM-1. Grout Reservoir. Neat Cement Grout (Very Flowable) Extension Displacement Plate

Improvement in physical properties for ground treated with rapid impact compaction

Abstract. Keywords. Pouya Salari 1, Gholam Reza Lashkaripour 2*, Mohammad Ghafoori 2. * lashkaripour@um.ac.ir

Understanding Plastics Engineering Calculations

SIENA STONE GRAVITY RETAINING WALL INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS. Prepared by Risi Stone Systems Used by permission.

BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS NOVEMBER 2003 SECTION 4 - FOUNDATIONS

Soil Strength. Performance Evaluation of Constructed Facilities Fall Prof. Mesut Pervizpour Office: KH #203 Ph: x4046

Copyright 2011 Casa Software Ltd. Centre of Mass

Specification Guidelines: Allan Block Modular Retaining Wall Systems

Report on. Wind Resistance of Signs supported by. Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) Pillars

DIRT DWELLING. and your. Pin Foundations Inc., 2008

ick Foundation Analysis and Design

DESIGN OF SLABS. 3) Based on support or boundary condition: Simply supported, Cantilever slab,

Laterally Loaded Piles

RETAINING WALL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 2006 ESTIMATING AND INSTALLATION MANUAL. Featuring Highland Stone. anchorwall.com

Important Points: Timing: Timing Evaluation Methodology Example Immediate First announcement of building damage

How to Design Helical Piles per the 2009 International Building Code

Load and Resistance Factor Geotechnical Design Code Development in Canada. by Gordon A. Fenton Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada

VERTICAL MICROPILE LATERAL LOADING. Andy Baxter, P.G.

5/1/2013. Topics. The challenge is to better maintain native characteristics of soils during and after construction

SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised 11/5/13)

c. Borehole Shear Test (BST): BST is performed according to the instructions published by Handy Geotechnical Instruments, Inc.

Technical handbook Panel Anchoring System

SPECIFICATION FOR DYNAMIC CONSOLIDATION / DYNAMIC REPLACEMENT

CE-632 Foundation Analysis and Design

Geotechnical Investigation Reports and Foundation Recommendations - Scope for Improvement - Examples

LEGACY REPORT ER ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Reissued November 1, Legacy report on the 1997 Uniform Building Code

Numerical Simulation of CPT Tip Resistance in Layered Soil

How To Design A Foundation

Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical design - Part 2 Ground investigation and testing

Structural Integrity Analysis

HOW TO DESIGN CONCRETE STRUCTURES Foundations

INTRODUCTION TO SOIL MODULI. Jean-Louis BRIAUD 1

High Strain Dynamic Load Testing of Drilled Shafts

ALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE

load on the soil. For this article s examples, load bearing values given by the following table will be assumed.

PDCA Driven-Pile Terms and Definitions

Module 1 : Site Exploration and Geotechnical Investigation. Lecture 4 : In-situ tests [ Section 4.1: Penetrometer Tests ] Objectives

Optimising plate girder design

1. Fluids Mechanics and Fluid Properties. 1.1 Objectives of this section. 1.2 Fluids

Comprehensive Design Example 2: Foundations for Bulk Storage Facility

ATLAS RESISTANCE Pier Foundation Systems

An Automatic Kunzelstab Penetration Test

Impacts of Tunnelling on Ground and Groundwater and Control Measures Part 1: Estimation Methods

APPENDIX G SETTLEMENT

ME531/ME413/CE413: Foundation Analysis and Design Spring 2015

M6a: Open Channel Flow (Manning s Equation, Partially Flowing Pipes, and Specific Energy)

12.2 Compact Type, MSB Series

Transcription:

Bearing Capacity (Daya Dukung Tanah) Dr. Ir.H. Erizal, MAgr

Definisi Daya dukung yang diizinkan (allowable bearing cap.) tekanan maksimum yang dapat diaplikasikan ke tanah dimana 2 kondisi diatas dipenuhi. Daya dukung batas (ultimate bearing cap.) tekanan minimum yang menyebabkan keruntuhan geser (shear failure) pada tanah pendukung secara cepat ke bawah.

Footing Performance Vertical Load Vertical movement Elastic maximum tolerable settlement safe load Plastic Serviceability Ultimate Limit State Maximum allowable load = min [safe load, max service load ] maximum service load Plunging Failure ultimate capacity

Limit States Serviceability Ultimate

Serviceability Limit State Maximum load at which structure still performs satisfactorily : Settlement Horizontal movement Rotation Sliding Applied Load Force (kn)

Bearing Pressure Definitions Allowable Bearing Pressure q a = < qf s (settlement) / A F Plan Area, A Ultimate Bearing Capacity q ult = F fail / A

Foundation Failure Rotational Failure Force Soil Heave Resistance

Generalized Shear Failure q Soil Failure Lines Settlement rigid radial shear passive log spiral

Local Shear Failure q minor surface heave only Settlement Medium dense or firm soils

Punching Shear Failure q No surface heave Settlement Loose or Soft Soils

Methods for calculating bearing capacity Full scale load tests Load tests on model footings Limit equilibrium analysis Detailed stress analysis such as the FEM method

Limit equilibrium analysis solutions for weightless soils: Solutions with φ = 0 : Prandtl smooth punch : q ult = 5.14c Prandtl rough punch : q ult = 5.7c Solutions with φ 0 : Rough punch passive active log spiral

Bearing Capacity for real soils Exact, theoretical analytical solutions have only been computed for special cases - e.g. soils with no weight, no frictional strength, φ or no cohesion, c. Approximate solutions have been derived by combining solutions for these special cases. The first solution was by Terzaghi (1943) - father of soil mechanics. Others later modified this solution. The failure mechanism corresponds to general failure. Corrections are applied to check for the possibility of local or punching shear failure.

Jenis pondasi berdasarkan kedalamannya 1. Pondasi dangkal (shallow foundation) bila kedalaman pondasi, Df, lebih kecil dibanding lebar pondasi, B 2. Pondasi dalam (deep foundation) bila kedalaman pondasi, Df, lebih besar/dalam dibanding lebar pondasi, B

Terzaghi s Bearing Capacity Eqn. For strip footings: q ult = c.n c + σ ZD.N q + 0.5γ BN γ φ c

Terzaghi s Bearing Capacity Eqn. For strip footings: q ult = c.n c + q.n q + 0.5γ BN γ φ c D f q = γ.d γ.d f B soil density, γ (kn/m 3 )

Terzaghi s Bearing Capacity Eqn. For strip footings: q ult = c.n c + q.n q + 0.5γ BN γ Bearing Capacity Factors for soil cohesion, surcharge and weight functions of friction angle, φ determine by equation or from graph

40 N c N q N γ Ø in Degrees 30 20 10 0 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 40 60 80 N c and N q 5.7 1.0 N γ

General Bearing Capacity Eqn. (1973, 1975) Based on theoretical and experimental work: q ult = c.n c F cs F cd F ci + q.n q F qs F qd F qi + 0.5γBN γ F γs F γd F γi φ c

General Bearing Capacity Eqn. q ult = c.n c F cs F cd F ci + q.n q F qs F qd F qi + 0.5γBN γ F γs F γd F γi φ c D f q = γ.d σ ZD = f γ.d B soil density, γ (kn/m 3 )

General Bearing Capacity Eqn. q ult = c N c F cs F cd F ci + qn q F qs F qd F qi + 0.5γBN γ F γs F γd F γi Bearing Capacity Factors for soil cohesion, surcharge and weight functions of friction angle, φ determine by equation or from graph or Table 3.3

General Bearing Capacity Eqn. q ult = c N c F cs F cd F ci + qn q F qs F qd F qi + 0.5γBN γ F γs F γd F γi Correction factors for footing shape (s), footing depth (d) load inclination (i ); could have additional base inclination (b), and ground inclination (g) determine from appropriate equations

General Bearing Capacity Factors (Table 3.3) 50 45 Nγ Hansen 40 Friction angle (degree) 35 30 25 20 15 Nγ Meyerhof Nc 10 Nq 5 0 1 10 100 1000 Nc, Nq and Nγ

Wall on Strip Footing Shape Factors Bird s s Eye View Column on Square Footing For non-strip footings : F cs, F cq, F γs 1 Failure lines Failure lines

Wall on Strip Footing Depth Factors For buried footings : F cd, F qd, F γd 1 q = γ.d f increased strength failure generally line length increases with depth

V = 1000 906 kn H = 423 kn Inclination Factors For inclined loads : F ci, F qi, F γi 1 Inclined load = 1000 kn Load inclination, θ = 25 o Failure surface shallower and shorter

Terzaghi or General General is more accurate Applies to a broader range of loading and geometry conditions General is more complicated

Contoh 1 Sebuah pondasi bujur sangkar dengan sisi 2.25 m diletakkan pada kedalaman 1.5 m pada pasir< di mana parameter kuat gesernya c =0 dan ø= 38 o. Tentukan daya dukung ultimit (a) bila muka air tanah berada di bawah elevasi pondasi, (b) jika muka air tanah berada pada permukaan tanah. Berat isi pasir di atas muka air tanah adalah 18 kn/m 3, berat isi jenuhnya 20 kn/m 3. Pondasi bujur sangkar q f = 0.4γBN γ + γdn q ø= 38 o N γ = 67, N q = 49 q f = (0.4 x 18 x 2.25 x 67) + (18 x 1.5 x 49) = 1085 + 1323 = 2408 kn/m 2 Daya dukung di bawah muka air: q f = 0.4γ BN γ + γ DN q γ = γ sat γ w = 20 9.8 = 10.2 kn/m 3 q f = (0.4 x 10.2 x 2.25 x 67) + (10.2 x 1.5 x 49) = 615 + 750 = 1365 kn/m 2

Contoh 2 Sebuah pondasi jalur didesain memikul beban 800 kn/m pada kedalaman 0.7 m pada pasir berkerikil. Parameter kekuatan geser yang tersedia adalah c =0 danø =40 o. Tentukan lebar pondasi bila faktor keamanan = 3 dan diasumsikan mungkin muka air tanah mencapai pondasi. Berat isi pasir adalah 17 kn/m 3, berat isi jenuhnya 20 kn/m 3. ø =40 o N γ =95 dan N q =64 q f = ½γ BN γ + γbn q = (½ x 10.2 x B x 95) + (17 x 0.7 x 64) = 485B + 762 q nf =q f γd ; q n = q - γd ; F = q nf / q n = 485B + 762 (17 x 0.7) = (800/B) (17 x 0.7) = 485B + 750 = (800/B) 12 1 (485B + 750) = 800 12 3 B B = 1.55 m

Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Footings with Concentric Loads

Ultimate Bearing Capacity with Ground Water Effect

Example: Determine the Allowable Bearing Capacity for A Rough Base Square Footing Using A Safety Factor Of 3. d = D = 5 γ T = 125 pcf B = 6 γ sub = 63 pcf φ = 20 c = 500 psf

Solution: Assuming A General Shear Condition, Enter the Bearing Capacity Chart for φ= 20 and Read N c = 14, N q = 6, Nγ = 3. Also note that formula for bearing capacity must account for the square footing and the water table within the failure zone. q ult B = (1+ 0.3 )CNc + [ γ subd + ( γt γsub )d]nq + 0.4γ subbnγ L = ( 1.3)(500)14 + [63(5) + (125 63)5]6 + 0.4(63)(6)(3) = 9100 + 3750 + q ult = 13,300psf q all = q ult 3 = 13, 300 3 450 4, 430 psf

What is the Effect on Bearing Capacity of Excavation of Soil Cover Over a Spread Footing?

Student Mini-Exercise on Bearing Capacity q ult = cn c + P o N q + 1/2 γ BN γ Properties and Dimensions (Assume Continuous Rough Footing) γ = Unit Weight D = Footing Embedment B = Footing Width Cohesive Soil φ = 0 c = 1000psf q ult (psf) Cohesionless Soil φ = 30 c = 0 q ult (psf) A. Initial Situation γ T = 120 pcf, D = 0, B = 5, deep water table 5530 5400 B. Effect of embedment D = 5, γ T = 120 pcf, B = 5, deep water table C. Effect of width, B = 10, γ T = 120 pcf, D = 0, deep water table D. Effect of water table at surface, γ sub = 57.6 pcf, D = 0, B = 5

Student Mini-Exercise on Bearing Capacity q ult = cn c + P o N q + 1/2 γ BN γ Properties and Dimensions (Assume Continuous Rough Footing) γ = Unit Weight D = Footing Embedment B = Footing Width Cohesive Soil φ = 0 c = 1000psf q ult (psf) Cohesionless Soil φ = 30 c = 0 q ult (psf) A. Initial Situation γ T = 120 pcf, D = 0, B = 5, deep water table B. Effect of embedment D = 5, γ T = 120 pcf, B = 5, deep water table 5530 5400 6130 17400 C. Effect of width, B = 10, γ T = 120 pcf, D = 0, deep water table D. Effect of water table at surface, γ sub = 57.6 pcf, D = 0, B = 5 5530 10800 5530 2592

Footing Bearing Capacity Objective: STUDENT EXERCISE NO.5 Find the Allowable Bearing Capacity Using a Safety Factor = 3, for the Condition Shown Below. Rough Base Footing 10 50 Final Grade 30 4 10 Sand γ = 115 pcf φ = 35 C = 0

Length Width 50 Footing = = 5 > 9 Water Level Width 30 4 = = 2.6 10 SOLUTION TO EXERCISE No. 5 Use Rectangular Formula No Water Effect = 2.6 > 1.5 Footing Widths below Footing Base = (115)(4)(37) + (0.4)(115)(10)(42) = 17,020 + 19,320 = 36,340 PSF 10 qult = γ DNq + 0.4γ BN γ Qall 36,340 = = 12,113 psf 3

How is bearing capacity theory related to the rule of thumb equation for stability; SAFETY FACTOR = 6 C γ H Soft clay layer Compact Sand H γ = Unit Weight cohesion = C

Spread Footing Design Bearing Capacity Explain how footing embedment, width, and water table affect footing bearing capacity Activities: Bearing capacity analysis