STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM



Similar documents
INTRODUCTION PART ONE: REVIEW OF PERFORMANCE ELEMENTS

The Citadel Policies & Procedures Human Resources Department. Employee Performance Management System

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY

Utica College Performance Review Form

Performance Appraisal System Evaluation Form Managers

Employee Performance Review

Performance Management System

Employee Performance Evaluation Form - Administrative Staff

Utica College Performance Review Form for LEADERSHIP

WINTHROP UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Sample Performance Appraisal

STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PROCEDURE

Supervisor s Guide to Performance Management: Performance Evaluation 1

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

HUMAN RESOURCES. Revised: 04/30/03 Reviewed and Updated 11/11/10. To ensure a means by which employees and their supervisors can:

NRCS PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE FOR NEW 5 LEVEL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

2. Describe this employee s important accomplishments during the past year. Please provide examples.

Initial Review 6 month Review Annual Other. Immediate Supervisor: Position Title: DRAFT

Performance Evaluation for Exempt Employees Employer Instructions

CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013

*This is a sample only actual evaluations must completed and submitted in PeopleSoft*

Boston University Performance Evaluation Program. Administrative Employees Exempt and Non-Exempt

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL EMPLOYEE GUIDE

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Employee Input

This policy provides establishes procedures for evaluating employees performance and communicating performance expectations.

Chapter 8: Performance Appraisal. Performance appraisal addresses the following objectives:

The Bureau of Public Service System PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

Interim Performance Management System. Performance Appraisal Form. User Manual

F. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM

FY 2015 Senior Professional (SP) Performance Appraisal System Opening Guidance

Interim Performance Management System for Positions Transitioning to the GS from NSPS. Department of the Navy Handbook. Version 2.

Fax No: (0360) , Academic Plan

Performance Management

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW INSTRUCTIONS AND FORM

Performance Evaluation Form: Part-Time & Seasonal Employees

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT

The University of Southern Mississippi Performance Appraisal Instructions

CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES

Classified Employee Performance Assessment

College of Design. Merit Pay Rating System. Merit Rating System

Cleveland State Community College. Classified Employee Performance Review

EVALUATION - SUPPORT STAFF

Manchester Community Schools Bus Driver Performance Appraisal

Black Hawk County Employee Performance Evaluation

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH Joint Employee Performance Appraisal Form

SMITHSONIAN DIRECTIVE 212, Federal Personnel Handbook, Chapter 430 NON-SENIOR-LEVEL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM

POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS

Annual Performance Review

PERFORMANCE REVIEW NON- UNIT PROFESSIONAL

EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL REPORT

Division of Human Resources Staff Performance Management Procedure

DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees

Performance Appraisal Handbook For Supervisors. For the evaluation of Non-Instructional Academic Staff (NIAS) and University Staff

Performance Evaluation Program. for Classified Staff Employees

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM

Oregon University System

GENERAL INFORMAT ION:

Employee s Name: Susan Jones. Title: Administrative Officer. Supervisor: Marcia Meadows. Date: April 2, 200x

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW FORM

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM FY

ADMINISTRATOR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL GUIDELINES

FOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

Performance Evaluation Guide for Classified Staff Employees. Classified Staff Performance Evaluation Program

Chapter 4 Performance Appraisal Process

Libraries and Educational Technologies Professional & Performance Development Form Library Faculty Self Evaluation

POLICY. Principal/Vice Principal Selection Process

SOCIETY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL OF VANCOUVER ISLAND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW

Employee Performance Review and Development (Non-Exempt)

POLICE OFFICER (EMPLOYEE) EVALUATION

Performance Competencies 1 = Does Not Meet Job Requirements

ADMINISTRATOR PERFORMANCE REVIEW FORM

Policy Memorandum No. 5 - FY Elected Officials, Agency Directors, and Personnel Officers State Government Agencies

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL APPRAISER S GUIDE

~~4 <l,.p. Human Resources Director

Bloomfield College Staff Employee Performance Review

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MODEL POLICY (Revised and Effective 11/1/09) MANDATORY BASELINE EPMS SYSTEM

MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Brant Haldimand Norfolk Catholic District School Board

Professional & Scientific Performance Appraisal

Policies and Procedures Manual

User s Guide to Performance Management

Transcription:

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Name Social Security No. Agency Department Position Classification Date Assigned to Current Position Performance Review From To PLANNING STAGE ACKNOWLEDGMENT Rating Officer Date Reviewed by Date Employee Date (Signature of the employee indicates the Planning Stage and Position Description were reviewed with the employee.) EVALUATION STAGE ACKNOWLEDGMENT Rating Officer Date Reviewed by Date Reviewing Officer Comments Employee Date (My signature indicates that I was given the opportunity to discuss the official performance review with my supervisor - not that I necessarily agree.) Employee Comments

Instructions The Planning Stage Job Functions - The supervisor, utilizing suggestions from the employee, shall select job duties from the employee's most recent position description and develop success criteria for each duty. Objectives - This section allows the supervisor to include any additional special projects or program assignments that are not on the position description but that are assigned to the employee during the rating period. Objectives are optional, but if used, success criteria are required for each objective. Performance Characteristics - Performance characteristics and their definitions should be directly related to the employee's job and may be selected by the supervisor and the employee from a list developed by the Office of Human Resources. All management and supervisory employees are required to be reviewed on "promoting equal opportunity." The supervisor should meet with the employee to discuss the position description and how it relates to the job functions and objectives for the upcoming year. After this discussion, the supervisor shall complete the planning stage of the document. Prior to discussing the completed planning stage with the employee, the supervisor will present the final document to the reviewing officer for signature. The supervisor will then meet with the employee to review the final plans for the year and obtain the employee's signature. The completed planning document should be maintained by the agency to be used as the evaluation document at the end of the review period. The Evaluation Stage The supervisor will complete the evaluation document based on the employee's performance for the entire year. Using the four levels of performance outlined below, job functions and objectives shall be rated on how well the employee has met the success criteria as outlined in the planning stage. Performance characteristics will be rated "acceptable" or "unacceptable" based on the definitions which were communicated to the employee in the planning stage. The characteristics shall be used as a communication tool and shall not be weighted in the determination of the overall performance rating. Once the supervisor has completed the evaluation document, it will be presented to the reviewing officer for signature. The supervisor will then schedule a meeting with the employee to discuss his/her performance and to obtain the employee's signature on the evaluation document. The evaluation must be completed prior to the review date to be timely. Four Levels of Performance (To rate job functions, objectives and overall performance) Meets Performance Requirements - Work that meets the success criteria for the job. Exceeds Performance Requirements - Work that is above the success criteria for the job throughout the rating period. Substantially Exceeds Performance Requirements - Work that is characterized by exemplary accomplishments throughout the rating period; performance that is considerably and consistently above the success criteria of the job. Below Performance Requirements - Work that fails to meet the success criteria of the job. (Performance characteristics will not be rated with the four levels of performance. They should be rated as "acceptable" or "unacceptable.")

AGENCY/WORK UNIT MISSION STATEMENT (Optional) JOB FUNCTIONS Performance Level 1. Job Function (Job Duty/Success Criteria): 2. Job Function (Job Duty/Success Criteria): 3. Job Function (Job Duty/Success Criteria): 4. Job Function (Job Duty/Success Criteria):

5. Job Function (Job Duty/Success Criteria): 6. Job Function (Job Duty/Success Criteria): 7. Job Function (Job Duty/Success Criteria): 8. Job Function (Job Duty/Success Criteria): ACTUAL PERFORMANCE

OBJECTIVES (Optional) Performance Level 1. Objective (Include Success Criteria): 2. Objective (Include Success Criteria): 3. Objective (Include Success Criteria): ACTUAL PERFORMANCE

PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS Acceptable/ Unacceptable 1. Characteristic: Promoting Equal Opportunity Definition: Includes meeting the Board s affirmative action goals in such areas as hiring and placement; level of personal and organizational commitment to equal opportunity. 2. Characteristic: 3. Characteristic: Definition: SUMMARY AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN Identify the employee s major accomplishments, areas needing improvement, and steps to improve present and future performance. APPRAISAL RESULTS Substantially Exceeds Exceeds Meets Below

S.C. Budget and Control Board WEIGHTED SYSTEM In order to reduce subjectivity in the evaluation a numerical value can be assigned to each level of performance. The supervisor and the employee will determine a weight for each individual job duty and objective. Performance characteristics will not be given a numerical score, but will be given a rating of acceptable or unacceptable. Substantially Exceeds Performance Requirements (SE) - 4 Range to 3.5 or above Exceeds Performance Requirements (E) - 3 3.4 to 2.5 Meets Performance Requirements (M) - 2 2.4 to 1.5 Below Performance Requirements (B) - 1 1.4 and below Acceptable (A) Unacceptable (UA) Model System - Example Weight Factor Rating Numerical Score 4 Duties 30 E 30 x 3 = 90 20 M 20 x 2 = 40 25 E 25 x 3 = 75 10 M 10 x 2 = 20 2 Objectives 10 SE 10 x 4 = 40 5 M 5 x 2 = 10 TOTAL 100 275 3 Characteristics A A A Divide the total numerical score, 275 by the total weight factor, 100, and you get 2.75, which will give the employee an overall performance appraisal rating of Exceeds Performance Requirements.