OPTIMIZING THE USE OF VHA s FEE BASIS CLAIMS SYSTEM (FBCS)



Similar documents
AT&T Global Network Client for Windows Product Support Matrix January 29, 2015

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

Analysis One Code Desc. Transaction Amount. Fiscal Period

Case 2:08-cv ABC-E Document 1-4 Filed 04/15/2008 Page 1 of 138. Exhibit 8

Enhanced Vessel Traffic Management System Booking Slots Available and Vessels Booked per Day From 12-JAN-2016 To 30-JUN-2017

OMBU ENTERPRISES, LLC. Process Metrics. 3 Forest Ave. Swanzey, NH Phone: Fax: OmbuEnterprises@msn.

Manchester City Council Report for Information. Managing Attendance (Real Time Absence Reporting)

Pega Texas Conference 2012 Department of Veterans Affairs. Terry Riffel, Director Financial Services Center October 26, 2012

Create Stoplight charts using Milestones Professional

PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN <PROJECT NAME>

Enterprise Projects Fiscal Year 2011/2012 Third Quarter Report

OPERATIONS SERVICE UPDATE

Ashley Institute of Training Schedule of VET Tuition Fees 2015

VA Medical Device Protection Program (MDPP)

Veterans Health Administration Chief Business Office Purchased Care

CENTERPOINT ENERGY TEXARKANA SERVICE AREA GAS SUPPLY RATE (GSR) JULY Small Commercial Service (SCS-1) GSR

Based on Chapter 11, Excel 2007 Dashboards & Reports (Alexander) and Create Dynamic Charts in Microsoft Office Excel 2007 and Beyond (Scheck)

Accident & Emergency Department Clinical Quality Indicators

Improving Pediatric Emergency Department Patient Throughput and Operational Performance

Performance Dashboards in Local Government: What, Why, and How?

Executive Branch IT Reorganization Project Plan

Discussion Outline. A. KPIs Defined. B. Why KPIs Matter. C. KPI Menu. D. Implementation. E. Example KPIs. F. Pitfalls

Qi Liu Rutgers Business School ISACA New York 2013

Annexure B: Planning, Budgeting and Performance Management Programme

Measuring and Monitoring Customer Experience

Evaluation of Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) Mapping and Transmission of Data Processes: Barriers and Lessons Learned

LeSueur, Jeff. Marketing Automation: Practical Steps to More Effective Direct Marketing. Copyright 2007, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina,

Maryland Board of Public Accountancy CPA Examination Application Process (August 1, 2012)

Computing & Telecommunications Services Monthly Report March 2015

1. Introduction. 2. User Instructions. 2.1 Set-up

Roles: Scrum Master & Project Manager

Managing Projects with Practical Software & Systems Measurement PSM

BCOE Payroll Calendar. Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Jun Jul Full Force Calc

Managing Open Source Code Best Practices

Sound Transit Internal Audit Report - No

VICTORIAN CARDIAC OUTCOMES REGISTRY. Data Management Policy

CAFIS REPORT

Restaurant Equipment Industry

Detailed guidance for employers

ACTIVE MICROSOFT CERTIFICATIONS:

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION REPORT Department for Business Innovations & Skills (BIS)

Financial Operating Procedure: Budget Monitoring

Consumer ID Theft Total Costs

Emergency Department Directors Academy Phase II. The ED is a Business: Intelligent Use of Dashboards

P/T 2B: 2 nd Half of Term (8 weeks) Start: 25-AUG-2014 End: 19-OCT-2014 Start: 20-OCT-2014 End: 14-DEC-2014

Department of Transitional Assistance Report on Paperless Documentation

P/T 2B: 2 nd Half of Term (8 weeks) Start: 26-AUG-2013 End: 20-OCT-2013 Start: 21-OCT-2013 End: 15-DEC-2013

Department of Public Welfare (DPW)

Daryl Fullerton. Oil & Gas Industry Principal

Continuous compliance through good governance

Boston Traffic Management Center Activity Report for FY 2013 Real-time Traffic Signal Adjustments

P/T 2B: 2 nd Half of Term (8 weeks) Start: 24-AUG-2015 End: 18-OCT-2015 Start: 19-OCT-2015 End: 13-DEC-2015

Sage ERP MAS 90, 200, 200 SQL, and Sage ERP MAS 500. Supported Versions

The Path Forward: Integrated Transition Plan October 2015

End of Life Content Report November Produced By The NHS Choices Reporting Team

Seven Tips for Building a Great Dashboard

Gilead Clinical Operations Risk Management Program

Basic Project Management & Planning

Easter Seals Central Texas Programs Outcome Profiles Monthly and Year to Date FY % 87% 80% 80% 84% 84% 83%

PROJECTS SCHEDULING AND COST CONTROLS

Professor Deborah Parker Ms Karen Gower Ms Brooke Scutt Ms Chantelle Baguley Ms Ngaio Toombes

Project Management Planning

Telehealth and Telemedicine Mary C. Foster, DNP, MSN, ANP VISN 6 Mid-Atlantic Health Care Network

INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENT & FIDUCIARY SERVICES: Building a Better Portfolio: The Case for High Yield Bonds

The Main Page of RE STATS will provide the range of data at the very top of the page.

Energy Savings from Business Energy Feedback

South Dakota Board of Regents. Web Time Entry. Student. Training Manual & User s Guide

Resource Management Spreadsheet Capabilities. Stuart Dixon Resource Manager

Office of Emergency Management Santa Monica, CA October 2014 Page 1. Public Safety Consolidation Communications Implementation Plan

Deep Security/Intrusion Defense Firewall - IDS/IPS Coverage Statistics and Comparison

One Newport s Performance Management Framework 2014/15

Implementing Carbon Reduction Without Impacting Working Capital. Presented by Dylan Crompton

Chairman Benishek, Ranking Member Brownley and Subcommittee Members:

Business Idea Development Product production Services. Development Project. Software project management

Cost & Schedule Risk Assessment 6.0. Timothy J. Havranek, MBA, PMP Leigh Hostetter, PMP

How To Get A Certificate From Ms.Net For A Server Server

ACTIVE MICROSOFT CERTIFICATIONS:

CALL VOLUME FORECASTING FOR SERVICE DESKS

Project Management Planning

County of Orange ~ Information Technology Quarterly IT Project Status Detail Report Fiscal Year , 1st Quarter

GAO VA HEALTH CARE. Reliability of Reported Outpatient Medical Appointment Wait Times and Scheduling Oversight Need Improvement

Deep Security Intrusion Detection & Prevention (IDS/IPS) Coverage Statistics and Comparison

Transcription:

VA-CASE VISN 11 VA Center for Applied Systems Engineering OPTIMIZING THE USE OF VHA s FEE BASIS CLAIMS SYSTEM (FBCS) The Fee Basis Claims System (FBCS) Optimization initiative aims to improve, standardize, and optimize the processes of receiving and handling claims from non-va providers. VHA Fee Basis Claims System Optimization Transactional Systems Program VISN 11 VA Center for Applied Systems Engineering (VA-CASE)

Optimizing the Use of VHA s Fee Basis Claims System (FBCS) Introduction Sponsored by the Chief Business Office Purchased Care (CBOPC) and supported by the VA- Center for Applied Systems Engineering (VA-CASE), FBCS Optimization is an initiative to improve and standardize the processes associated with the Fee Basis Claims System (FBCS). FBCS is the software currently used to process claims within Non-VA Medical Care Units (NVMCU) across the country. The FBCS Optimization initiative aims to optimize processes between the time a claim is received from a non-va provider and the time a claim is rejected, denied, or paid. National deployment of FBCS Optimization began in June 2012 and is targeted for completion by September 2014. Identifying Key Areas for Optimization In FY10, CBOPC and VA-CASE collaborated with subject matter experts from various NVMCUs across the country to develop standardized business processes to optimize the use of the FBCS software. The following areas were identified as frequent bottlenecks, and therefore targeted as key focus areas for optimization: 1) scanning, 2) verification, 3) distribution and processing, 4) clinical review, and 5) customer service calls. In FY11/FY12, the optimized FBCS processes were piloted at Alpha and Beta test sites. The pilot results showed improved timeliness in processing claims and an increase in the volume of claims processed per day. Based on these outcomes, CBOPC decided to deploy FBCS Optimization at the national level. Establishing a National Implementation Strategy The CBOPC/VA-CASE team developed an implementation strategy to deploy FBCS Optimization to all Fee Units within a VISN simultaneously, with deployment occurring at an average of four VISNs per quarter. VISN deployment consisted of three phases totaling 13 months: 1) Pre-Implementation (1 month); 2) Implementation (5 months); and 3) Post- Implementation (7 months). During Pre-Implementation, each Fee Unit completed a Site Survey from which VA-CASE completed a Gap Analysis and a site-specific Implementation Plan. Additionally, a two-day FBCS/claims processing training session was conducted by the National Non-VA Medical Care Program Office (NNPO) Field Assistance Team. During the Implementation phase, the CBOPC/VA-CASE team facilitated weekly calls with each VISN team to provide training on various FBCS Optimization tools, discuss incremental progress towards implementation goals, and answer questions. During Post-Implementation, the team facilitated monthly calls to monitor sustainment of the process changes, and reviewed each site s performance by utilizing the FBCS Optimization Metrics Dashboard. Deployment Status As of February 2014, FBCS Optimization was deployed to 20 VISNs. Of these VISNs, 7 have completed Post-Implementation, 9 are in the Post- Implementation phase, and 4 are in the Implementation phase. VISN 11 VA-CASE Transactional Systems Program April 2014 Page 1

Optimizing the Use of VHA s Fee Basis Claims System (FBCS) Developing Optimization Deliverables Deployment Materials: The VA-CASE team developed detailed Implementation Guides, Technical Guides, and Excel-based tools to assist Fee Management in implementing the optimized processes. An Alpha Split tool assisted the NVMCUs in creating a balanced workload for claims processors by assigning letter(s) of the alphabet to each processor based on claim volumes and the number of processors. Staffing tools were developed for mailroom and scanning functions, verification, and a modified call center. The Metrics Dashboard and ly Metrics Reports Analysis Tool were used by all participating VISNs/facilities to monitor overall performance. Many of these tools were modified to maximize usability based on feedback from the field, and are now available on the FBCS Optimization Intranet Site. 1 FBCS Optimization Metrics Dashboard: VA-CASE developed an Excel-based standardized Dashboard to track the effectiveness of the FBCS Optimization process changes. The resulting FBCS Optimization Metrics Dashboard was utilized to monitor the performance of NVMCUs throughout the initiative s national deployment and sustainment phases. As shown in Figure 1, the Dashboard utilizes data obtained from FBCS to score performance metrics across multiple categories that are expected to be positively impacted by the optimized processes, including throughput, inventory, and timeliness. The Dashboard then measures performance by comparing this data against established targets. Select Begin Date Select End Date FBCS Optimization Performance Oct-2013 Nov-2013 Performance Score Weighted Score 1 Baseline Average 68.8% Implementation Average 77.5% Post Average 84.9% Post Improvement Over Baseline 23.4% Oct-13 83% Nov-13 81% Average 82% Volume, Throughput, Inventory Volume Throughput Inventory 7, 13 Timeliness Metrics Equal Total Claims Received 2 % HCFA Claims % UB Claims Total Claims Processed 3 Ratio of Processed Claims to Received Claims 4 100% Total Claims Pending EOM 5 Target % of Claims Aged 30 Days or Less EOM 6 90% Oct-13 Nov-13 Average 52265 46430 49348 77% 76% 77% 23% 24% 23% 57105 48200 52653 109% 104% 107% 42577 41745 42161 79% 76% 77% to or better than target Target Oct-13 Nov-13 Average 1. Verification 1.1. % of Claims Verified within 4 Days of Scanning 8 90% 97% 28206 of 28979 76% 18142 of 23873 88% 23174 of 26426 2. Distribution 2.1. % of Claims Distributed within 4 Day of Verification 14 90% 98% 51876 of 53125 98% 44260 of 45352 98% 48068 of 49239 3. Adjudication 9 3.1. % of Claims Adjudicated within 15 Days of Distribution 90% 48% 27441 of 56609 48% 24099 of 49834 48% 25770 of 53222 4. Processed 4.1. % of Claims Processed within 30 Days of Scanning 90% 62% 35188 of 57105 65% 31236 of 48200 63% 33212 of 52653 4.2. % of Claims Processed within 7 Days of Adjudication 90% 93% 53209 of 57105 94% 45213 of 48200 93% 49211 of 52653 ly Metrics Reports Analysis Tool Version Date 13 9/18/2013 9/18/2013 Figure 1. The FBCS Optimization Metrics Dashboard provides Non-VA Medical Care Unit managers with the ability to identify trends and possible bottlenecks in their process. 1 Tools are available at: http://nonvacare.hac.med.va.gov/fbcs/optimization/default.asp. VISN 11 VA-CASE Transactional Systems Program April 2014 Page 2

Weighted Performance Score and Factors Optimizing the Use of VHA s Fee Basis Claims System (FBCS) Performance is visually represented on the Dashboard through stop lights, with green representing performance equal to or better than the target, yellow for performance within 10% of the target, and red for performance outside the 10% threshold. The key performance metric of the FBCS Optimization Metrics Dashboard is a weighted performance score (WPS) comprised of three equally weighted factors serving specific functions: 1) percent of claims pending, aged less than thirty days, to track backlogged claim inventory; 2) ratio of processed claims to received claims, to measure productivity in relationship to claim volume; and 3) percent of claims processed within thirty days, to monitor the timeliness of claims processing. A WPS report, summarizing the facilities overall performance, is distributed monthly to each participating VISN. An example graph featured in the monthly report is displayed in Figure 2. The graph assesses the change in a VISN's performance over a one year period. Average Weighted Performance Score & Factors Trend Chart 140% 130% 120% 110% 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Weighted Performance Score % Claims Aged 30 Days or Less Ratio Processed / Received Claims % Claims Processed Within 30 Days Oct-2012 Nov-2012 Dec-2012 Jan-2013 Feb-2013 Mar-2013 Apr-2013 May-2013 Jun-2013 Jul-2013 Aug-2013 Sep-2013 Figure 2. Average VISN WPS and Three Contributing Factors, over 12- Period The FBCS Optimization Metrics Dashboard compliments other measurement tools that are available to NVMCU management, such as the FBCS End of Day Report and NNPO Stoplight Report. The differentiator between the Dashboard and these other reporting tools is the enhanced scope of information and level of detail contained in the Dashboard. All data used in the Dashboard is extracted directly from FBCS, which provides an objective report and eliminates the chance of human error that can result from the self-reported data. Additionally, the Dashboard was developed with direct feedback from the field to ensure that information assists the field in identifying bottlenecks and trends. Many NVMCU managers use the VISN 11 VA-CASE Transactional Systems Program April 2014 Page 3

Claims Optimizing the Use of VHA s Fee Basis Claims System (FBCS) Dashboard to communicate performance to front-line staff and leadership in their facilities and VISNs. Centralized Dashboard Data: Reports cannot be generated on a national level within FBCS due to the design of the software and housing of data on several dozen independent servers across the country. In order to overcome this hurdle, the CBO/VA-CASE project team requests that each participating NVMCU upload their Dashboard monthly to the FBCS Optimization SharePoint. The data is then linked to a centralized Excel-based Master Workbook. Centralizing the data allows the project team to create consolidated reports at the VISN and national levels. FBCS Optimization VISN reports are currently created and distributed to NVMCU management on a monthly basis and reviewed on recurring calls with each participating VISN (see Figure 3). 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 Figure 3. Reports are currently created at the VISN level, distributed to Non-VA Medical Care Unit management on a monthly basis, and reviewed on recurring calls with each participating VISN. Project Results Deployment Phase s Inventory levels, Aged more than 30 days Inventory levels, Aged 30 Days or less Received Claims Claims Processed Less Red Good Less Green Good Higher Blue Good Using the twelve-month timeframe immediately preceding Implementation as a Baseline period, VA-CASE assessed performance changes in participating facilities Baseline and Post- Implementation periods. By February 2014, 61 facilities among VISNs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 12, 15, 20, 21, & 22 had experienced at least three months of Post-Implementation. VA-CASE analyzed the percentage improvement in their weighted performance scores (WPSs) from the Baseline into the Post-Implementation periods. Across the 61 facilities, WPSs improved an average of 3 percent. Although the WPS is an excellent measure for how a site is currently doing, it is not the best measure to determine how a site has improved over time. This is due mainly to the fact that the WPS is strongly influenced by highly fluctuating incoming claim volumes, which can negatively VISN 11 VA-CASE Transactional Systems Program April 2014 Page 4

Optimizing the Use of VHA s Fee Basis Claims System (FBCS) impact a site s overall WPS. A more accurate measure to determine overall performance changes is the throughput rate, or total claims processed per month, at a site. When comparing throughput rates between the Baseline and Post-Implementation periods among these 61 facilities, total claims processed per month improved an average of 26 percent. Spreading FBCS Optimization Tools & Data Other Non-VA Medical Care groups within CBO have utilized information gathered by the FBCS Optimization project team. Data from the Dashboard was incorporated into the Standing Inventory Elimination Tool recently developed by VA-CASE to assist CBO with their priority of immediately reducing their claims backlog. Additionally, NNPO has made several requests to VA-CASE for FBCS Optimization data that could help sites struggling with claims processing to determine their constraints and need for on-site training. As the reputation of the FBCS Optimization Metrics Dashboard continues to spread, the CBO/VA-CASE team expects that Dashboard data will continue to improve the oversight and management of NVMC claims processing across VHA. VISN 11 VA-CASE Transactional Systems Program April 2014 Page 5