4. There are no dependent variables specified... Instead, the model is: VAR 1. Or, in terms of basic measurement theory, we could model it as:



Similar documents
2. Linearity (in relationships among the variables--factors are linear constructions of the set of variables) F 2 X 4 U 4

Factor Analysis. Principal components factor analysis. Use of extracted factors in multivariate dependency models

A Brief Introduction to SPSS Factor Analysis

Common factor analysis

Exploratory Factor Analysis Brian Habing - University of South Carolina - October 15, 2003

Overview of Factor Analysis

How To Run Factor Analysis

Rachel J. Goldberg, Guideline Research/Atlanta, Inc., Duluth, GA

Factor Analysis Example: SAS program (in blue) and output (in black) interleaved with comments (in red)

Factor Analysis. Advanced Financial Accounting II Åbo Akademi School of Business

Factor Analysis Using SPSS

SPSS ADVANCED ANALYSIS WENDIANN SETHI SPRING 2011

Data analysis process

To do a factor analysis, we need to select an extraction method and a rotation method. Hit the Extraction button to specify your extraction method.

Practical Considerations for Using Exploratory Factor Analysis in Educational Research

PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS

FACTOR ANALYSIS NASC

T-test & factor analysis

Exploratory Factor Analysis and Principal Components. Pekka Malo & Anton Frantsev 30E00500 Quantitative Empirical Research Spring 2016

STA 4107/5107. Chapter 3

A Beginner s Guide to Factor Analysis: Focusing on Exploratory Factor Analysis

An introduction to. Principal Component Analysis & Factor Analysis. Using SPSS 19 and R (psych package) Robin Beaumont robin@organplayers.co.

5.2 Customers Types for Grocery Shopping Scenario

Statistics in Psychosocial Research Lecture 8 Factor Analysis I. Lecturer: Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer

Exploratory Factor Analysis

Topic 10: Factor Analysis

Factor Analysis: Statnotes, from North Carolina State University, Public Administration Program. Factor Analysis

EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS IN MPLUS, R AND SPSS. sigbert@wiwi.hu-berlin.de

Introduction to Principal Components and FactorAnalysis

Factor Rotations in Factor Analyses.

Questionnaire Evaluation with Factor Analysis and Cronbach s Alpha An Example

What is Rotating in Exploratory Factor Analysis?

Using Principal Components Analysis in Program Evaluation: Some Practical Considerations

Research Methodology: Tools

Psychology 7291, Multivariate Analysis, Spring SAS PROC FACTOR: Suggestions on Use

How to Get More Value from Your Survey Data

Factor Analysis. Chapter 420. Introduction

Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most From Your Analysis

A Brief Introduction to Factor Analysis

Statistics for Business Decision Making

DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF EMPLOYEES PERSPECTIVES ON HIGH ATTRITION

Principal Component Analysis

Choosing the Right Type of Rotation in PCA and EFA James Dean Brown (University of Hawai i at Manoa)

How to report the percentage of explained common variance in exploratory factor analysis

Factor Analysis. Sample StatFolio: factor analysis.sgp

The Effectiveness of Ethics Program among Malaysian Companies

FACTOR ANALYSIS. Factor Analysis is similar to PCA in that it is a technique for studying the interrelationships among variables.

Multiple Regression in SPSS This example shows you how to perform multiple regression. The basic command is regression : linear.

The Effect of Macroeconomic Factors on Indian Stock Market Performance: A Factor Analysis Approach

LIST OF TABLES. 4.3 The frequency distribution of employee s opinion about training functions emphasizes the development of managerial competencies

What Are Principal Components Analysis and Exploratory Factor Analysis?

Factor Analysis Using SPSS

Review Jeopardy. Blue vs. Orange. Review Jeopardy

THE USING FACTOR ANALYSIS METHOD IN PREDICTION OF BUSINESS FAILURE

Chapter 7 Factor Analysis SPSS

Factor Analysis. Overview

9.2 User s Guide SAS/STAT. The FACTOR Procedure. (Book Excerpt) SAS Documentation

Dimensionality Reduction: Principal Components Analysis

CHAPTER 8 FACTOR EXTRACTION BY MATRIX FACTORING TECHNIQUES. From Exploratory Factor Analysis Ledyard R Tucker and Robert C.

Exploratory Factor Analysis

Exploratory Factor Analysis

Exploratory Factor Analysis: rotation. Psychology 588: Covariance structure and factor models

Factors affecting teaching and learning of computer disciplines at. Rajamangala University of Technology

CHAPTER VI ON PRIORITY SECTOR LENDING

SPSS and AMOS. Miss Brenda Lee 2:00p.m. 6:00p.m. 24 th July, 2015 The Open University of Hong Kong

APPRAISAL OF FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONING OF PUNJAB TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY

Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA)

DISCRIMINANT FUNCTION ANALYSIS (DA)

International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 3; February 2012

Moderation. Moderation

Multivariate Analysis

How To Understand Multivariate Models

This chapter will demonstrate how to perform multiple linear regression with IBM SPSS

CHAPTER 4 EXAMPLES: EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS

Pull and Push Factors of Migration: A Case Study in the Urban Area of Monywa Township, Myanmar

Improving Your Exploratory Factor Analysis for Ordinal Data: A Demonstration Using FACTOR

Additional sources Compilation of sources:

Simple Linear Regression, Scatterplots, and Bivariate Correlation

Succession planning in Chinese family-owned businesses in Hong Kong: an exploratory study on critical success factors and successor selection criteria

Principal Component and Principal Axis Factoring of Factors Associated with High Population in Urban Areas: A Case Study of Juja and Thika, Kenya

Instructions for SPSS 21

Reliability Analysis

Univariate Regression

Running head: ONLINE VALUE AND SELF-EFFICACY SCALE

Data Analysis in Mixed Research: A Primer

Exploratory Factor Analysis; Concepts and Theory

A Comparison of Variable Selection Techniques for Credit Scoring

Multivariate Statistical Inference and Applications

Introduction to Matrix Algebra

Factor Analysis - SPSS

Part III. Item-Level Analysis

Factor analysis. Angela Montanari

Multivariate Analysis (Slides 13)

Validation of the Core Self-Evaluations Scale research instrument in the conditions of Slovak Republic

STATISTICA Formula Guide: Logistic Regression. Table of Contents

Transcription:

1 Neuendorf Factor Analysis Assumptions: 1. Metric (interval/ratio) data 2. Linearity (in the relationships among the variables--factors are linear constructions of the set of variables; the critical source of info for the factor analysis is typically the correlation matrix among all variables) 3. Univariate and multivariate normal distributions 4. There are no dependent variables specified... Instead, the model is: VAR 1 VAR 2 F 1 VAR 3 VAR 4 F 2 VAR 5 Or, in terms of basic measurement theory, we could model it as: U 1 VAR 1 F 1 U 2 VAR 2 U 3 VAR 3 U 4 VAR 4 F 2 U 5 VAR 5 Meaning that each variable is composed of the common variance it shares with other variables (F1 and F2) and its own unique variance that is not shared (e.g., U1). The proportion of a variable s variance that is common is called its communality. (This is the same as 1 U).

2 Decisions to make: 1. Intent: Exploratory vs. Confirmatory 2. Factor extraction (how factors represent variables): Principal Component Factoring (the most typical): -factors derived on the basis of total variance for each variable (both the variance accounted for by F s and U s (unique variances) above. -uses the "regular" correlation matrix. -more widely used than common factoring. Common Factoring: -factors derived on basis on common variance only (variance accounted for by F s, but not the U s above). -uses a correlation matrix with estimated communalities, not 1.0s, in diagonals. There are several options for common factor extraction--principal axis factoring (most typical), unweighted least squares, generalized least squares, maximum-likelihood, alpha, and image (see an SPSS manual or SPSS help for more info.). 3. Rotation: Rotating the factors leads to greater interpretability of factors; since there is no true DV or criterion, there is no reason not to rotate in factor analysis. Rotation will maximize simple structure where each item hopefully has a high loading on one factor and low loadings on all others. There are two rotation options: Orthogonal Factors -factors will be completely uncorrelated (orthogonal=at right angles to each other). -SPSS provides 3 types--varimax (by far the most typical), quartimax, and equamax (your book calls this equimax). See Hair p. 115 for comparisons. Oblique Factors -factors are allowed to correlate (but don't have to) -SPSS provides two types--direct oblimin (most typical) and promax. 4. How many factors? A. Theory (a priori). B. Latent root criterion--eigenvalues of 1+ (a factor must account for at least the amount of variance associated with one hypothetical variable). C. Scree test--plots eigenvalues sequentially. Look for a "natural break" between the mountain and the scree.

3 Statistics: 1. Remember that the interitem correlation matrix is the basis, the "raw material," for the typical factor analysis. Two statistics help assess whether the items are indeed correlated enough to proceed with factor analysis. Be reminded of Hair et al. s and others caution that large samples and a large number of items will contribute to strong and significant statistics here: A. Bartlett's test of sphericity--indicates whether the correlation matrix is significantly different from an identity matrix (a matrix with all 1's on the diagonal, 0's everywhere else). Bartlett s calculation is based on a chi-square transformation of the determinant of the correlation matrix. Statistical significance is good here (note that this is the only statistical significance test in the Factor Analysis output!). It tells us that this set of measures is intercorrelated enough so as to be appropriate for factor analysis. B. KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) measure of sampling adequacy (MSA)--assesses whether your sample of items (not people) is adequate by comparing r's with pr's. We look for large values for the KMO (approaching 1.0). Note that Hair et al. call the statistic MSA while SPSS calls it KMO. Although there is no significance test, Hair (p. 104) lists some pretty fun rules of thumb for the stat (i.e.,.80 or above is meritorious ;.70 or above is middling ;.60 or above is mediocre ;.50 or above is miserable ; below.50 is unacceptable ). 2. Coefficients predicting variables from factors--found in the rotated component matrix in SPSS for orthogonal rotation, and in the pattern matrix for oblique rotation. The β s as below: VAR1 = β 1 F1 + β 2 F2 + β 3 F3 VAR2 = β 4 F1 + β 5 F2 + β 6 F3 VAR3 = β 7 F1 + β 8 F2 + β 9 F3 etc. 3. Factor loadings, i.e., correlations between the variables and the factors--in orthogonal rotation, these are the same as the coefficients predicting variables from factors, in oblique they are not, and are contained in the structure matrix. In order for an item to have loaded on a factor, Hair says a.30 coefficient is minimal (others use a.50 cutoff). Hair (p. 117) provides a chart for assessing the statistical significance of each loading, something that is not provided by SPSS. 4. Communality (h 2 ) the total amount of variance a variable shares with all factors (and, therefore, the amount it shares with all other variables in the factor analysis). In an orthogonal rotation, the communality is the sum of all squared loadings for one variable. Rules of thumb are actually few, but Costello and Osborne (2005) do indicate a.40 as a minimum.

4 h 2 = how much (%) of the variable's variance is explained by all the factors; 1-h 2 = what is unique to the variable. e.g., β 2 1 + β 2 2 2 + β 3 from #2 above would be the communality of VAR1, assuming orthogonal rotation. Here, the communality is comparable to R 2 VAR1 F1F2F3. 5. Eigenvalue--the sum of all squared loadings for one factor. Eigen = the amount (not expressed as a %) of the variables' total variance that is accounted for by one factor. e.g., β 1 2 + β 4 2 + β 7 2, etc. from #2 above would be the eigenvalue for F1. 6. Proportion of total variance accounted for by F1 = eigenvalue for F1 k where k=# of variables 7. Proportion of common variance accounted for by F1 = eigenvalue for F1 SUM of eigenvalues 8. Factor score coefficients (betas predicting factors from variables β s as below; these are not the same as loadings or coefficients predicting variables from factors). The factor score coefficients are found in the component score coefficient matrix in SPSS. These values are used by SPSS to create "factor scores"--values on new scales created for each factor. These new scales must be saved in the FACTOR procedure if you want to use them for further analysis. There are three options--we typically use the regression method. SPSS will name the new scales automatically and place them at the end of the data set. F1 = β 1 VAR1z + β 2 VAR2z + β 3 VAR3z + β 4 VAR4z + etc. F2 = β 5 VAR1z + β 6 VAR2z + β 7 VAR3z + β 8 VAR4z + etc. F3 = β 9 VAR1z + β 10 VAR2z + β 11 VAR3z + β 12 VAR4z + etc. 9. Correlations among factors--for oblique rotation only! Found in the component correlation matrix, this indicates how much the various factors (and therefore their scales, if created) relate to one another in linear fashion. References Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9. Accessed from: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=7 Kim, J.-O., & Mueller, C. W. (1978). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

5 WORKSHEET--Making Sense of Factor Loadings For this exercise: -Assume all measures are 0-10 indicators of enjoyment of different TV/film genres. -Assume an orthogonal rotation. -Don't forget that loadings must be squared before adding to get communalities and eigenvalues. -Notice that the loadings are not ordered by size. Such an ordering makes it easier to interpret the matrix. SPSS will do this if you click Sorted by size under Factor Options. Label: Hypothetical Factor Loadings: Communalities Communalities at 3 at 10 FACTOR 1 FACTOR 2 FACTOR 3 Factors: Factors: Q1--News.25691.24989.80751.78 1.0 Q2--Westerns.61936.18150.10120.43 1.0 Q3--Action.61937 -.01767.32450.49 1.0 Q4--Weepies.01612.75095 -.10217.57 1.0 Q5--Game shows -.62921.09360.24968.47 1.0 Q6--Soaps -.42346.62972 -.00855.58 1.0 Q7--Talk shows -.54741.41574.01161.47 1.0 Q8--Comedies.48948.31404 -.45143.54 1.0 Q9--Horror.74784.18525 -.05745.60 1.0 Q10--Cop shows.68488.12134 -.06675? 1.0 Eigenvalues: 2.98 1.39 1.05 sum=? sum=10.0 % of Total Variance: %? %? %? %? % of Common Variance: %? %? %? 100% 2/16