NARUC Attorneys Conference Intercarrier Compensation Panel



Similar documents
Connect America Fund & Intercarrier Compensation Reform Order and FNPRM Executive Summary

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION RELEASES STUDY ON TELEPHONE TRENDS

SHIFMAN S UNIVERSAL SERVICE AND INTERCARRIER COMPENSATION REFORM PLAN

March 13, Enclosed for filing in the above-referenced matter, please find Reply Comments of the Michigan Cable Telecommunications Association.

VoIP Overview Wayne Fonteix - AT&T Presented to: NARUC Committee on Telecommunications NARUC Committee on Finance and Technology February 25, 2003

How Does Universal Service 911 Inter-Carrier Compensation Affect You?

CPE Certificates. Carrier Billing: Advanced Topics. Must sign in and sign out each day to receive Continuing Professional Education (CPE) Credits

TAC Memo VoIP Interconnection. September 24, 2012

Before the. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

America s Broadband Connectivity Plan

Before the Senate Standing Committee on Utilities February 3, Opponent Testimony On Senate Bill 346

Telecommunications Issues in NM Economic & Rural Development Legislative Interim Committee September 20, 2012

REFORM SCENARIOS AND POTENTIAL FINANCIAL IMPACTS

Public Utility Commission of Texas

The IP Interconnection Debate: What is it and Why is it So Important?

CONSULTANTS PLAN FOR UNIVERSAL SERVICE

Addendum StartPage: 0

How We Got Here: The Oregon Universal Service Fund Prepared for the April 16, 2015 Workshop Docket UM 1481

Trends in Telephone Service

Preparing for CAF Phase II and Tribal Mobility Funding Opportunities

How To Review Chapter 364 Of The Florida State Constitution

Implementing InterCall: USF Implications for the Conference Call Industry

THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS BEFORE THE RHODE ISLAND PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

FCC Urban Rates Survey Data Collection. Filing Instructions

Review Of The Commission Workplace (O1) And Its Role In SIP Interconnection Services

Intercarrier Compensation Reform: What s the Bottom Line Impact? Monday, April 16, Intercarrier Compensation Business

Federal Telecom Issues: What s Going on in D.C.? Montana Telecoms. Assn. 9/01/15

PUBLIC MEETING. Utah Committee of Consumer Services. May 15, 2012

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C COMMENTS OF JOHN STAURULAKIS, INC.

June 21, 2005 Mark Wigfield FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION RELEASES STUDY ON TELEPHONE TRENDS

Realities of Outsourcing: 14th in a Series of Webinar Presentations. Telecommunications Sourcing. October 11, 2007

Florida Public Service Commission. White Paper on. Internet Pricing: Regulatory Implications and Future Issues. September 25, 2000.

An electronic clearing house and settlement system for exchanging electronic transactions among banking institutions.

Kelly Cameron +1(301) janvier 2015

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C COMMENTS OF VONAGE HOLDINGS CORPORATION

Universal Service Fund Reform: Who Pays and Who Receives? Nicholas Miller Best Best & Krieger LLP. IMLA Mid-Year Conference Washington DC

Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Core-Edge Working Group Meeting, September 28-29, 2004 Chintan Vaishnav Research Assistant, MIT CFP

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C In the Matter of ) ) Rural Call Completion ) WC Docket No.

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Telecom Regulatory Reporting

Dark Fiber Lease Considerations

KANSAS CORPORATION COMMISSION IP-to-IP Interconnection Report

THE UNIVERSAL SERVICE PROGRAM: A REGULATORY SUBSIDY CASE STUDY

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

PURC Telecom Policy Roundtable October 30, Chris McDonald Comcast Director State Gov t.. Affairs - Florida

Federal Universal Service System

KRASKIN, LESSE &. COSSON,

Understanding the impact of the Universal Service Fund and Intercarrier Compensation Transformation Order. kpmg.com

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554

A1. VoIP-PSTN Traffic CONTENTS. A1.4 Calculation and Application of Percent-VoIP-Usage Factor

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

STATE OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION PETITION. filing, and respectfully requests that the Commission determine and establish the charge and

An Oligopoly Analysis of AT&T s Performance in the Wireline Long- Distance Markets After Divestiture

Michigan Central Broadband Company Original Preface Sheet No. 1 MPSC Tariff No. 25U REGULATIONS, RATES AND CHARGES FOR INTRASTATE TOLL ACCESS SERVICE

BEFORE THE WASHINGTON UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

Before the U.S. Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF WTA: ADVOCATES FOR RURAL BROADBAND

Comment on FCC 13-51, Access to NANPA Numbering Resources by VOIP Providers. Comment Submitted by Mike Ray on behalf of Terra Nova Telecom, Inc.

Telecommunications Deregulation: Updating the Scorecard for 2013

Control Number : Item Number : 262. Addendum StartPage : 0

Presented by: Bob Gnapp. (800)

COMMENTS TEXAS LEGAL SERVICES CENTER BEFORE THE TEXAS SENATE BUSINESS AND COMMERCE COMMITTEE REGARDING THE INTERIM CHARGE TO BE HEARD AUGUST 14, 2012

Please call if you have any questions regarding the enclosures.

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION

Telecom Audit Training Module. Understanding Telecom Taxes, Fees, and Surcharges

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C

The Long-Term Telephone Number & Regulation Meeting

Telecom Decision CRTC

Before the. Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C AND. Charles Acquard, Executive Director NASUCA Colesville Road, Suite 101

Understanding Universal Service Reform. Jonathan S. Marashlian, Esq. Robert Dumas, CPA

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

September 2009 Prepared by Ashpaugh & Sculco, CPAs, PLC

State Telecom Legislation: Broken Promises

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Analysis and Recommendations Regarding the Regulation of FairPoint Communications, LLC Report Required By Act 53 of the Legislative Session

Public Interest Ex Parte Comment on Intercarrier Compensation and Universal Service 1

Before the. Federal Communications Commission. Washington, D.C ) ) ) REPORT AND ORDER AND FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) RECOMMENDED DECISION

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISISON Washington, D.C

How To Set Interconnection Pricing

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

MAINE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION PLAN TO REFORM TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATION

Wireline Competition Bureau

GAO. Federal and State Universal Service Programs and Challenges to Funding TELECOMMUNICATIONS

The State of Nebraska Public Service Commission and Declaratory VoIP Case Files

Low Income Program. Best Practices

Schedule of Rates, Terms and Conditions Original WHOLESALE SERVICES TARIFF

The Future of IDAHO S UNIVERSAL SERVICE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT

Kamailio in the North American PSTN

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C GN Docket No PS Docket No WC Docket No.

In the Matter of ) ) ) ) Consumer Information and Disclosure ) CG Docket No Truth-in-Billing and Billing Format ) CG Docket No.

NATOA 2011 Conference - Gigabit Communities San Francisco September 20-23, 2011

Voice. of the Industry ISSN Regional Systems Edition. In This Issue:

It s All Interconnected.

Re: The Commission s Own Motion, to Commence an Investigation into Voice Over Internet Protocol Issues in Michigan MPSC Case No.

Rural Task Force and High-Cost Support

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Intrastate Switched Telephone Access Charges in Kentucky FINAL REPORT. Prepared for: Connected Nation. November 28, 2011

Transcription:

NARUC Attorneys Conference Intercarrier Compensation Panel June 14, 2005 John T. Nakahata Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis, LLP

The System is Broken Even When the Services are Fundamentally Alike, the Present System: Establishes financial responsibility for the origination, interconnection and termination of traffic in a disparate and uneconomic manner; Applies different rate structures; and Applies different rate levels. Competition and new technology make this system obsolete and unsustainable. 2

CURRENT INTERCARRIER COMPENSATION MECHANISM MTA 21 MTA 10 INTERSTATE INTRA-MTA STATE.2.2? 2.5 LOCAL/INTRALATA?.2.2.6?.6? Pittsburgh, PA (SLC, UT).6 Breezewood, PA (Reno, NV) Baltimore, MD (Sacramento, CA) Silver Spring, MD Current Intercarrier Compensation Rates for Terminating Traffic (Terminating Monopoly) Terminating Node Rockville, MD 3

CURRENT INTERCARRIER COMPENSATION MECHANISM MTA 21 MTA 10 INTERSTATE INTRA-MTA STATE -.2 -.2? 2.5 LOCAL/INTRALATA? -.2 -.2.6?.6? Pittsburgh, PA (SLC, UT).6 Breezewood, PA (Reno, NV) Baltimore, MD (Sacramento, CA) Silver Spring, MD Current Intercarrier Compensation Rates for Originating Traffic (Paid to Originating LEC) Originating Node Rockville, MD 4

Interstate Access Minutes (Millions) of Non-Tier-1 & Tier-1 ILECs 12,000 140,000 130,000 11,000 120,000 Non-Tier-1 10,000 110,000 Tier-1 100,000 9,000 90,000 8,000 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 80,000 1999 1999 1999 1999 2000 2000 2000 2000 2001 2001 2001 2001 2002 2002 2002 2002 2003 2003 2003 2003 2004 2004 2004 Non-Tier 1 9,207 9,444 9,713 9,798 10,054 10,396 10,760 10,786 11,096 11,084 11,132 10,871 11,068 11,067 11,352 11,162 11,152 11,126 11,237 11,025 11,284 11,083 11,394 Tier 1 126,486 128,754 128,584 130,694 132,817 132,425 130,554 130,226 126,978 126,019 122,156 120,336 114,152 113,344 108,155 106,948 103,031 100,963 98,736 96,761 97,997 94,993 93,784 Year/Quarter 5

Traffic Trends: Total Wireless vs. Wireline Interstate 1,000 900 800 700 Total Wireless Wireline-Interstate Billions of Minutes 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Source: FCC, NECA and CTIA 6

The ICF Results After 3 Years The ICF Plan Achieves: Uniform Network Interconnection Rules. Uniform Rate Structure. Uniform Rate Levels. Universal Service Reform and Stability. The ICF Plan Resolves the Myriad of Problems Present in Today s Broken System. 7

ICF PLAN: TERMINATION RATES AFTER 3 YEARS MTA 21 MTA 10 Pittsburgh, PA (SLC, UT) INTERSTATE INTRA-MTA Breezewood, PA (Reno, NV) STATE LOCAL/INTRALATA Baltimore, MD (Sacramento, CA) Silver Spring, MD Rate for All Termination is.0175 (Eliminated after 6 years) (Terminating Monopoly) Terminating Node Rockville, MD 8

ICF PLAN: ORIGINATION AFTER 3 YEARS MTA 21 MTA 10 INTERSTATE INTRA-MTA STATE LOCAL/INTRALATA Pittsburgh, PA (SLC, UT) Breezewood, PA (Reno, NV) Baltimore, MD (Sacramento, CA) Silver Spring, MD Origination Costs Recovered from Originating Customer Originating Node Rockville, MD 9

The starting point. Before competition a single carrier serves two customers. Follow the money. The originating and terminating customers pay the carriers for the ability to make and receive calls. The carrier pays its vendors, and earns its profits. Government regulates the carrier s rates. Originating End-office functions Intermediate or Transit office Terminating End-office functions $ $ $ $ Vendors 10

What happens when there is a second carrier a competitor? With intercarrier compensation, Carrier 1 pays Carrier 2. Carrier 2 can use both its charges to its own customer and its charges to other carriers to pay its vendors, and earn its profits. But with mandatory interconnection, Carrier 2 has a terminating monopoly (i.e, it is the only carrier that can terminate traffic to this called party). So government has to regulate the termination price, and if costs and rates are not aligned, market distortions develop. Originating End-office functions Intermediate or Transit office Terminating End-office functions Carrier 2 $ $ Vendors $ 11

An alternative cost recovery system for competition. Assume no intercarrier compensation. The originating customer pays its carrier for the ability to make and receive a call; the originating carrier pays its vendors. The terminating carrier, Carrier 2, charges its customer for the ability to make and receive calls, and pays its vendors. Carrier 2 s costs are recovered from its customer, and not the customers of the originating carrier. No government oversight of the termination rate is necessary. This is similar to the Internet, in which each user pays for its own connectivity. Originating End-office functions Intermediate or Transit office Terminating End-office functions Carrier 2 $ $ Vendors 12

Legal Authority for a Uniform Intercarrier Compensation System Section 251(b)(5) All LECs required to enter into reciprocal arrangements for termination. No origination fees under FCC rules. Section 252(d)(2) Governs rate setting for 251(b)(5). Section 251(g) Preserved pre-1996 access charge arrangements, but only until the FCC superceded such arrangements. Section 251(d)(3) Doesn t address access charges, but access to UNEs. In any event, state regulations can be superceded. 13

Key Features of the Plan The Plan has three primary components: Rate Restructuring The Plan begins to restructure rates on July 1, 2005 to bring immediate relief from today s broken system. Staged transition achieves a uniform system of intercarrier compensation on July 1, 2008, with a single termination rate of $0.000175/minute for all traffic, with no origination fee. This termination rate remains unchanged for two years and then transitions to zero by July 1, 2011. Plan includes protections for rural America, including a continuing optional transport revenue stream for rural carriers. Network Interconnection The Plan contains clear and explicit network rules regarding the technical and financial obligations for the efficient interconnection of diverse carrier networks. New rules take effect on July 1, 2007, giving carriers sufficient time to implement. Network rules provide a framework for voluntary carrier negotiations. Universal Service New explicit support replaces implicit support in intercarrier compensation. Stabilizes and broadens the universal service funding base. Plan contains modifications that enhance incentives for rural investment. 14

Step Summary of Key Events in the ICF Plan Year beginning July 1: 1 2005 2 2006 3 2007 4 2008 5 2009 Network Interconnection No Change New "Edge" rules take effect. New rates for edgeto-edge interconnection transport, transiting, and optional CRTC terminating transport take effect. Large Carriers SLC caps rise in a 4-step transition subject to three constraints: (1) Neither the $6.50 residential SLC cap nor the average residential SLC rate can increase by more than $0.75/month in steps 1 and 2, or by more than $1.00 in Steps 3 and 4. (2) No individual residential SLC rate can increase by more than $0.95/month in Steps 1 and 2, or by more than $1.20/month in Steps 3 and 4. (3) Other SLC caps (nonprimary residential and MLB) increase only to the extent they would otherwise be below the residential SLC cap. All SLC caps uniform at $10.00 (USF calculated accordingly); inflation indexing takes effect SLC Transition CRTCs Between Step 1 and Step 5, residential SLC caps increase from $6.50 to $9.00 in $0.50 annual increments. In Steps 1-3, other SLC caps increase only to the extent that they would otherwise be below the residential SLC cap. At Step 4, the MLB SLC cap increase to $10.00. Pricing Flexibility for Price Cap Carriers Step 1 SLC pricing flexibility (subject to revenue limits, constraints to prevent shifting recovery from business to residential users, and safeguards to prevent any effect on USF). Additional Step 4 SLC pricing flexibility (subject to safeguards that prevent any effect on USF), including removing end user charges from price caps. Intercarrier Payments Large Carriers CRTCs Access Charges Non-Access Access Charges Non-Access Four equal step plan transitions all interstate and intrastate access charges to SLCs, new universal service support, and a single, uniform rate of $0.000175 per terminating minute. At step 1, nonaccess compensation rates unified at $0.0003525 per minute. Between Step 1 and Step 4, a four-step plan transitions all nonaccess compensation to SLCs, new universal service support, and a single, uniform rate of $0.000175 per terminating minute. Four equal step plan transitions all interstate and intrastate access charges to SLCs, new universal service support, and a single, uniform rate of $0.000175 per terminating minute. Uniform termination rate of $0.000175 per terminating minute. (Terminating transport rates for CRTCs preserved). $0.0125 per minute default recip comp rate established for CRTC- CMRS traffic. Other non-access compensation rates unified at $0.0003525 per minute. Four-step plan transitions all nonaccess compensation to SLCs, new universal service support, and a single, uniform rate of $0.000175 per terminating minute. At Step 3, CRTC option to take terminating transport rates to an average of $0.0095 per terminating minute for interconnecting carriers electing to use such transport to reach CRTC network edges. No Change Universal Service All at Step 1: New support mechanisms (ICRM and TNRM) provide support for intercarrier compensation amounts otherwise not recoverable. Maintain rate-of-return principles for rate-of-return carriers. Cap removed from rural high cost loop support mechamism. Changes to Safety Valve Mechanism take effect. Certain rural price cap carriers gain option to elect support from nonrural mechanism. Telephone number and capacity-based unit contribution methodology replaces current interstate revenue-based system. 6 2010 (Optional) Residential SLC caps increase to $9.50 Termination rate reduced by 50% to $0.0000875/terminating minute. (Terminating transport rates for CRTCs preserved). 7 2011 (Optional) Residential SLC cap increases to $10.00 Termination rate reduced to zero. (Terminating transport rates for CRTCs preserved). 8 2012 No Change Termination rate remains at zero. (Terminating transport rates for CRTCs preserved). 15