Understanding Universal Service Reform. Jonathan S. Marashlian, Esq. Robert Dumas, CPA
|
|
|
- Bridget Benson
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Understanding Universal Service Reform Jonathan S. Marashlian, Esq. Robert Dumas, CPA
2 Speaker Bios Jonathan Marashlian, Esq. Jonathan Marashlian, partner at Helein & Marashlian, LLC, The CommLaw Group, assists clients with regulatory compliance and strategies, transactional, litigation and regulatory defense matters before the FCC and state regulatory agencies across the nation. He counsels clients in all aspects of state and federal regulatory matters, focusing on compliance with the Universal Service Fund and similar regulatory programs through his firm s unique Compliance & Reporting service, The Commpliance Group. Jonathan earned his J.D. from the George Mason University School of Law. Robert Dumas, CPA Accountant, consultant and entrepreneur Robert Dumas began his public accounting career on the tax staff at Arthur Young & Co., followed by a brief stint at Grant Thornton. In the late 1980s, Robert joined BellSouth Corporation s tax department. In 1996, he left BellSouth to pursue a career as an independent consultant. Three years later, Robert founded Tax Partners, which became the largest sales tax compliance service bureau in the country. Robert served as president of Tax Partners and helped grow the business to $16 million in seven years. The company was sold to Thomson Corporation in March 2005, and Robert served as vice president of operations in Thomson s transaction tax business unit until founding TaxConnex in Robert is a nationally recognized expert on telecommunications taxation and a frequent speaker on the subjects of transaction tax, business process outsourcing and sales tax compliance. He is a graduate of the University of Georgia, and holds a masters degree in accountancy, with a tax emphasis.
3 What is Universal Service? Section 254 of the 1996 Telecommunications Act requires the FCC to establish regulations to ensure: Support for the universal availability of telecommunications to all Americans at just and reasonable rates, including: Support for high cost areas Support for public schools & libraries Support for rural heathcare/telemedicine All providers of interstate telecommunications and interconnected VoIP providers must contribute to the support of Federal universal service in an equitable and nondiscriminatory manner by making quarterly contributions to the Universal Service Fund ( USF )
4 How USF works today: Revenue-Based Contributions Since 1996, USF funding is based on a percentage of telecom provider revenue Interstate & international billed and collected end user telecommunications revenue The FCC has extended this contribution obligation to Interconnected VoIP providers USAC sets the contribution factor each quarter based on projected fund requirements Contribution factor steadily increasing
5 Why does current USF need reform? No support for broadband The current USF does not include broadband internet access as a supported service Declining revenue base Primary contributors under current system experiencing historic declines in revenue Fierce competition among IXCs forcing prices to all-time lows Inter-model competition from wireless and broadband/ip Bundling of local, long distance, wireless & video in non-usage sensitive packages resulting in minimized interstate revenue Interstate long distance revenues are being cannibalized by new technologies These developments have led to ever increasing contribution factor < 4% in 1996 Currently 12.9% (peaked at 15.3% in 2Q FY 2010) High USF contribution factor beckons regulatory arbitrage and non-compliance
6 USF Reform: Overview Reform efforts have been ongoing since the USF was created in 1997 Both in Congress and by the FCC Most recent reform proposals have centered on: Including broadband as a supported service Reducing inefficiencies Limiting the size of the USF Reforming contribution methodology Reform is controversial and the stakes are high
7 USF Reform: Proposals at the FCC National Broadband Plan: proposed USF reform, to be implemented in two stages: Stage One: ( ) Identify current funding to shift to support broadband Connect America Fund: Support broadband in unserved areas Mobility Fund: Provide one-time support for deployment of 3G networks Establish a long-term plan for Intercarrier Compensation reform, and examine middle-mile costs and pricing Stage Two: ( ) Begin disbursements from CAF and Mobility Fund Implement ICC/middle mile pricing reform Begin USF Contribution Reform
8 USF Reform: FCC Implementation of the NBP s USF Reform Proposals The FCC has begun efforts to implement the NBP s proposal for USF Reform Connect American Fund NOI/NPRM (rel. Apr. 21, 2010) NOI sought comment on cost model to determine USF support for broadband and ways to target funding for broadband deployment in unserved areas NPRM sought comment on ways to cap USF growth and cut inefficient funding in legacy high-cost support mechanisms and shift savings toward broadband Mobility Fund NPRM (rel. Oct. 14, 2010) Seeks comment on the creation of the Mobility Fund as one mechanism to support broadband Proposes to use USF funds freed up by the Verizon and Sprint voluntary merger commitments to surrender high-cost USF support
9 USF Reform: FCC USF Reform Moving Forward Absent Congressional action, contribution reform will be addressed in Stage Two of the NBP USF Reform Proposal Current Proposals Include: Numbers Plan Connections Plan Numbers/Hybrid Plan Modified Revenue-Based Contribution Scheme Expanding the Contribution Base
10 USF Reform: Contribution Reform Proposals Numbers Plan: all communications service providers with working, in use telephone numbers (or equivalents) would be assessed a flat, per number fee Connections Plan: all connections to an interstate public or private network would be assessed a flat, per number fee Numbers/Connections Hybrid Plan: would assess residential users a fee based on working numbers and business users a fee based on working connections
11 USF Reform: Contribution Reform Proposals (cont.) Modified Revenue-based System: maintain aspects of the current revenue-based system. Could be inspired by European Value Added Tax (VAT) Expanding Contribution Base: maintain current system, require broadband providers and other communications service providers to contribute
12 USF Reform: Congressional Action Universal Service Reform Act of 2010: Introduced in the House on July 21 st by Reps. Rich Boucher (D-VA) and Lee Terry (R-NE) Declares broadband to be a supported service Limits USF so it does not unreasonably burden consumers Expands contribution base to include: Broadband providers Non-interconnected VoIP providers Current contributors Defers to FCC to decide whether to base contribution methodology on revenues, numbers, or combination. Potential for increased contributions: If FCC opts for a revenue-based approach it can assess contributions on Interstate, Intrastate, and International communications services!
13 USF Reform: Congressional Action (cont.) Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010: Requires all VoIP providers (both interconnected and non-interconnected) to contribute to the Telecommunications Relay Service Fund Demonstrates Congress willingness to expand federal contribution obligations beyond telecommunications carriers and Interconnected VoIP providers
14 What does this all mean? Reform to the USF is imminent and the contribution base will be expanded USF contribution obligations will likely be extended to: Broadband providers Non-interconnected VoIP providers A revenue-based system will likely be maintained USF Contribution obligations have tax implications
15 The Commpliance Group and TaxConnex: We Are Here to Help! The Commpliance Group Services: In association with TaxConnex ( the Commpliance Group provides clients with Total Outsourced Regulatory Compliance (TORC) TORC fulfills the triumvirate of Regulatory, Corporate, and Tax compliance servicing needs of companies operating in the regulated communications industry TORC is available on a nationwide, multi-state or state-bystate basis Provides the communications industry with the only true onestop, professionally-serviced and custom-tailored solution to fulfill every Regulatory, Corporate and Tax compliance need
16 The Commpliance Group and TaxConnex: We Are Here to Help! (cont.) TaxConnex is the leading choice for complete telecom, sales & use tax services and information from experienced sales tax professionals TaxConnex provides the full spectrum of telecom, sales & use tax services, including: Multi-state consultation on nexus, taxability and audits Multi-state compliance, return preparation and remittance Customized, client-intimate Service Delivery for your particular situation
17 Contact Us for More Information Jonathan Marashlian (703) Robert Dumas (877)
18
Regulatory,Taxand BusinessImplicationsof. RelatedtoEnhanced Communications
Regulatory,Taxand BusinessImplicationsof RecentFCCDecisions RelatedtoEnhanced Communications Regulatory, Tax and Business Implications of Recent FCC Decisions Related to Enhanced Communications Jonathan
Kelly Cameron +1(301) 768-7263 [email protected] +216 95 320 650. 26 janvier 2015
TUNISIA BUSINESS REFORM AND COMPETITIVENESS PROJECT Workshop sur le Service Universel L Expérience Américaine Kelly Cameron +1(301) 768-7263 [email protected] +216 95 320 650 26 janvier 2015
White Paper Understanding and Navigating Your Telecommunications Tax and Regulatory Requirements
White Paper Understanding and Navigating Your Telecommunications Tax and Regulatory Requirements Understanding and Navigating Your Telecommunications Tax and Regulatory Requirements Understanding and Naviga.ng
VoIP Service Provider Regulatory Compliance Guide:
VoIP Service Provider Regulatory Compliance Guide: Your Comprehensive Guide for Ensuring Compliance with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and State Regulations Applicable to Interconnected VoIP
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) High-Cost Universal Service Support ) WC Docket No. 05-337 ) Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service ) CC
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 COMMENTS OF JOHN STAURULAKIS, INC.
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of High-Cost Universal Service Support Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service WC Docket No. 05-337 CC Docket No.
Telecom Audit Training Module. Understanding Telecom Taxes, Fees, and Surcharges
Telecom Audit Training Module Understanding Telecom Taxes, Fees, and Surcharges ... can add 20-30% to telecom costs! 6 5 4 Taxes, Fees & Surcharges 3 2 1 Taxes, Fees, Surcharges Monthly Charge 0 General
INTERCONNECTED VOIP REGULATORY COMPLIANCE MANUAL
INTERCONNECTED VOIP REGULATORY COMPLIANCE MANUAL Prepared and maintained by: The CommLaw Group www.commlawgroup.com 1420 Spring Hill Road, Suite 205 McLean, VA 22102 Regulatory Compliance Guide for Telecommunications
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Universal Service Contribution Methodology Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review
Implementing InterCall: USF Implications for the Conference Call Industry
Implementing InterCall: USF Implications for the Conference Call Industry July 15, 2008 Presented by Brad Mutschelknaus, Steve Augustino, and Tom Cohen Agenda Overview of USF and the InterCall Decision
BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON D.C. 20554
BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON D.C. 20554 In the Matter of: ) ) Contributions to the Telecommunications ) CG Docket No. 11-47 Relay Services Fund ) Introduction Comments of the
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Contributions to the Telecommunications ) CG Docket No. 11-47 Relay Services Fund ) ) COMMENTS OF THE INFORMATION
Federal Telecom Issues: What s Going on in D.C.? Montana Telecoms. Assn. 9/01/15
Federal Telecom Issues: What s Going on in D.C.? Montana Telecoms. Assn. 9/01/15 Federal Issues - Connect America Fund - Technology Transition - Call Completion - IntraMTA Petition - Net Neutrality - Municipal
Taxing Telecommunications
Taxing Telecommunications October 11, 2005 Deborah R. Bierbaum, Director External Tax Policy Document/Ref erence Number 2004 AT&T, All Rights Reserv ed. Overview Review issues and factors challenging current
An electronic clearing house and settlement system for exchanging electronic transactions among banking institutions.
498 Company Officer 499 Company Officer The officer of a service provider company who is authorized to certify that data set forth in the FCC Form 498 is true, accurate, and complete. The 498 Company Officer
KANSAS CORPORATION COMMISSION IP-to-IP Interconnection Report
KANSAS CORPORATION COMMISSION IP-to-IP Interconnection Report 2014 REPORT ON IP- TO- IP INTERCONNECTION A Summary of Status of the FCC s Internet Protocol- to- Internet Protocol Interconnection Proceeding
Regulatory and Tax Issues Impacting Non-Interconnected VoIP and Other One-Way VoIP Services
Regulatory and Tax Issues Impacting Non-Interconnected VoIP and Other One-Way VoIP Services Speaker Bios Michael P. Donahue Partner, The CommLaw Group Mr. Donahue has represented CLECs, ISPs, VoIP providers,
BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION
BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) WC Docket No. 10-90 Connect America Fund ) OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION The United States
Federal Universal Service System
Federal Universal Service System FCC Form 499 TRS Fees USF Fees LNPA Fees ITSP Fees NANPA Fees High Cost Program: $4.2B (partially capped; 2013) Rural Healthcare Program: $92 million (2013) E-rate Program:
Low Income Program. Best Practices
Low Income Program Best Practices 1 Overview One Lifeline account per household Advertising and Outreach FCC Form 497 Certification and Verification Recordkeeping 2 Best Practices One-per Household 3 One
TAXING THE CLOUD: State and Local Tax Issues and Implications of Cloud Communications Services on Cloud Computing
TAXING THE CLOUD: State and Local Tax Issues and Implications of Cloud Communications Services on Cloud Computing Jonathan S. Marashlian Allison D. Rule The media buzz surrounding cloud computing and industry
Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Core-Edge Working Group Meeting, September 28-29, 2004 Chintan Vaishnav Research Assistant, MIT CFP
Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Core-Edge Working Group Meeting, September 28-29, 2004 Chintan Vaishnav Research Assistant, MIT CFP [email protected] 1 Outline Part I Regulatory Issues Part II The Core-Edge
Telecommunications Deregulation: Updating the Scorecard for 2013
Telecommunications Deregulation: Updating the Scorecard for 2013 Sherry Lichtenberg, Ph.D. Principal Telecommunications National Regulatory Research Institute NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Accounting & Finance
AT&T Billing Glossary
# A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z # 411 An information/directory Assistance service provided by operators who assist customers in obtaining the telephone number(s) they wish to call.
How Does Universal Service 911 Inter-Carrier Compensation Affect You?
Voice over Internet (Protocol) Kevin C. Schoen, President [email protected] This Presentation: What is VOI(P)? Universal Service 911 Inter-Carrier Compensation Who s ACD? Facilities based CLEC. Operates
Regulatory Landscape: FCC Regulation of Non-Interconnected VoIP Services and the Cloud
Regulatory Landscape: FCC Regulation of Non-Interconnected VoIP Services and the Cloud Jonathan Marashlian Introduction Welcome to the uncertain regulatory universe of the Cloud Cloud-based communications
COMMENTS OF COX COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Lifeline and Link Up Reform and Modernization Lifeline and Link Up Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Advancing
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) In the Matter of ) ) Petition for Declaratory Ruling of ) American Electric Power Service ) Corporation et al. Regarding the ) Rate
How To File the FCC Form 499-A
How To File the FCC Form 499-A March 2013 Completing the 2013 FCC Form 499-A Who must file the FCC Form 499-A? Instructions pgs. 2-3 ALL intrastate, interstate, and international providers of telecommunications
The Future of IDAHO S UNIVERSAL SERVICE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT
Idaho Public Utilities Commission The Future of IDAHO S UNIVERSAL SERVICE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT April 2015 Idaho Public Utilities Commission 472 W. Washington St. Boise, ID 83702
Enhancing Broadband Capabilities in the New Native America
Enhancing Broadband Capabilities in the New Native America Prepared for By: 8a\SBD Certified Turtle Island Communications, Inc. April 2013 About Us: TICOM is an American Indian Owned Telecommunication
2012 499-A Webinar March 2012. www.usac.org
2012 499-A Webinar March 2012 Topics What is New for 2012 Completing the 2012 FCC Form 499-A 2012 499 A/Q True Up Navigating E-File What is New For 2012 Non-Interconnected VoIP For Purposes of TRS Contribution
GAO. Federal and State Universal Service Programs and Challenges to Funding TELECOMMUNICATIONS
GAO February 2002 United States General Accounting Office Report to the Ranking Minority Member, Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet ) ) ) ) GN Docket No. 14-28 COMMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION
THE YEAR IN WIRELINE TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATION SEPTEMBER 2010 SEPTEMBER 2011
THE YEAR IN WIRELINE TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATION SEPTEMBER 2010 SEPTEMBER 2011 JOHN T. NAKAHATA BRITA D. STRANDBERG CHRISTOPHER WRIGHT PAUL MARGIE TIMOTHY SIMEONE PAT O DONNELL KRISTINE LAUDADIO DEVINE
Report to the 82 nd Texas Legislature
2011 Report to the 82 nd Texas Legislature Scope of Competition in Telecommunications Markets of Texas Public Utility Commission of Texas January 2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Public Utility Commission of Texas
Review Of The Commission Workplace (O1) And Its Role In SIP Interconnection Services
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Petition for Declaratory Ruling That tw telecom inc. Has The Right To Direct IP-to-IP Interconnection Pursuant To Section
Telecom Regulatory Reporting
Telecom Regulatory Reporting The material appearing in this presentation is for informational purposes only and is not legal or accounting advice. Communication of this information is not intended to create,
Telecommunications Competition: Where is it and Where is it Going? DAVID BREVITZ, C.F.A. 36 TH ANNUAL PURC CONFERENCE FEBRUARY 5, 2009
Telecommunications Competition: Where is it and Where is it Going? DAVID BREVITZ, C.F.A. 36 TH ANNUAL PURC CONFERENCE FEBRUARY 5, 2009 Where Have We Been? A series of telecom market-opening actions since
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20554
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Modernizing the E-Rate Program ) WC Docket No. 13-184 For Schools and Libraries ) ) COMMENTS OF THE WRITERS GUILD
How To Review Chapter 364 Of The Florida State Constitution
The Florida Senate Interim Report 2011-108 October 2010 Committee on Communications, Energy, and Public Utilities REVIEW CHAPTER 364, FLORIDA STATUTES, RELATING TO TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES TO IDENTIFY
Good Filing Practices
Filing the FCC Form 499 Good Filing Practices March 17, 2015 Webinar Agenda Agenda New For the 2015 FCC Form 499-A Annual True-Up De Minimis Good Filing Practices How to Avoid Common Findings FCC Form
` Instructions for Completing the Service Provider and Billed Entity Identification Number and Contact Information Form
` Instructions for Completing the Service Provider and Billed Entity Identification Number and Contact Information Form The FCC Form 498 is used to collect contact, remittance, and payment information
Addendum StartPage: 0
Control Number : 39717 Item Number : 29 Addendum StartPage: 0 PROJECT NO. 39717 cz * s; ^^1^,jA lt RULEMAKING PROCEEDING PUBLIC UTILITY COMNIISj^; RELATED TO VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL (VoIP) OF TEXAS
Classifying Broadband Services as Telecommunications Services: A Tidal Wave of Change to USF Contribution Rules or a Slow Road to Somewhere?
Classifying Broadband Services as Telecommunications Services: A Tidal Wave of Change to USF Contribution Rules or a Slow Road to Somewhere? Orlando, FL Friday, May 15, 2015 10:15AM-11:00AM C. Douglas
New FCC Regulations for Prepaid Card Providers
New FCC Regulations for Prepaid Card Providers NACT Telecommunications 1 Disclaimer This presentation has been made available by NACT Telecommunications to the general public for the purpose of alerting
REGULATORY FEES FACT SHEET
REGULATORY FEES FACT SHEET Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 September 11, 2015 WHAT YOU OWE INTERSTATE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE PROVIDERS (ITSP) FOR FY 2015
Remarks As Prepared for Delivery by Jonathan Adelstein NARUC Annual Meeting Atlanta, GA
Remarks As Prepared for Delivery by Jonathan Adelstein NARUC Annual Meeting Atlanta, GA Good morning. And thanks, President Coen, for that introduction! It is great to back with all of you at NARUC s Annual
INSPECTOR GENERAL STATEMENT ON THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION S MAJOR MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES FISCAL YEAR 2005
INSPECTOR GENERAL STATEMENT ON THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION S MAJOR MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES FISCAL YEAR 2005 05-AUD-04-08 November 15, 2005 Office of Inspector General ******* Federal Communications
Financial Analysis for Frontier Communications Corp. (FTR)
MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive Financial Analysis for Frontier Communications Corp. (FTR) Ammar Aldubaikhi and Nidal Alsayyed 1. August 2011 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/66989/ MPRA Paper
