Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Core-Edge Working Group Meeting, September 28-29, 2004 Chintan Vaishnav Research Assistant, MIT CFP
|
|
|
- Rodger Bruce Dickerson
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Core-Edge Working Group Meeting, September 28-29, 2004 Chintan Vaishnav Research Assistant, MIT CFP 1
2 Outline Part I Regulatory Issues Part II The Core-Edge Movement Part III Core-Edge as a Regulatory Lens Part IV Regulatory Outcome and the Core-Edge Challenges and Opportunities 2
3 Part I Regulatory Issues
4 Positioning this talk While there is much debate about the following issues Categorization (Title I, II, III, VI) Classification (Telecommunications vs. Information Service; Forbearance vs. Ancillary Jurisdiction) Jurisdiction (Interstate vs. Intrastate) Consumer Protection Economic Regulation Rural Considerations International Trade many of these can be discussed more clearly only if we understand how VoIP will address five regulatory issues 4
5 Five Regulatory Issues Social 911/E911 CALEA Disability Access Universal Service Economic Inter-Carrier Compensation (ICC) 5
6 911/E911 Current Obligations 1. Identify emergency call and route to appropriate PSAP (Basic 911) 2. Provide call back information (E911) 3. Provide Location (E911) VoIP Challenges 1. Different Identifier Identifies a person or device, not a line or location May not be a phone number (e.g. [email protected]) 2. Devices are Nomadic (more than wireless) Devices move, the Identifier remains the same (customer must change location) Multiple devices, the same Identifier 3. Separation of Access, Transport and Application VoIP Opportunities 1. More robust 911 with multimedia support 2. Reconcile differences in wireline and wireless 6
7 Social Issues Summary ISSUE CURRENT OBLIGATIONS VoIP CHALLENGES 911/E911 CALEA Disability Access Universal Service 1. Identify emergency call and route to appropriate PSAP 2. Provide call back information 3. Provide location 1. Provide call-identifying information 2. Provide content tracing (lawful intercept) capability 3. Ensure security and privacy 1. Manufacture accessible telecommunications equipment and CPE 2. Provide relay service (TRS, IP, VRS etc.) 3. Do not install network features, functions or capabilities not compliant with disability access requirement 1. Contribution to the USF 2. Receive subsidy from the USF 1. Different Identifier 2. Devices are Nomadic 3. Separation of Access, Transport and Application 1. Call-identification Information unknown to the service provider 2. Tension between wiretap, security, privacy and innovation 1. Standardization of multimode communications 2. Funding multimode communications 1. Should VoIP support the USF? 2. Should the USF support VoIP? 7
8 Economic Issue Summary ISSUE CURRENT OBLIGATIONS VoIP CHALLENGES Inter-Carrier Compensation 1. Access Charges 2. Reciprocal Compensation 3. Voluntary Negotiations 1. IP agnostic to physical media exacerbates the existing arbitrage opportunities 2. Signaling and bearer (content) separation 8
9 Part II The Core-Edge Movement
10 Core-Edge Movement Need Core & Edge Can be Exclusively Edge Data Rate Control Retransmission Control QoS Admission Control Location Detection Session Control (e.g. SIP) CORE Configuration Security (e.g. SSL) Location Admin. (e.g. Vonage) Identifier Selection (e.g. On-the-fly Transport Selection (e.g. push2talk) Migrating Functionality + Fragmented Ownership = Distributed Control Policy Question Can the societal goals be achieved through 10 distributed regulatory responsibility? EDGE
11 VoIP Scenarios VoIP in the backbone VoIP at the edge, with PSTN interaction VoIP at the edge, no PSTN interaction A B1 B2 C IXC Domestic and International Long Distance (e.g. AT&T) Facilities based IP Telephony (e.g. VoCable, VoDSL, VoIP over Wireless) Q. Are there other scenarios? VoIP over Broadband (e.g. Vonage) P2P (e.g. FWD, Skype, Yahoo!, IM) 11
12 Part III Core-Edge as a Regulatory Lens
13 Impact of Core-Edge Movement on Regulations Current Obligations + Core-Edge Movement = Regulatory Challenges On the communications value chain 1. Who currently has/fulfills the obligation? 2. Who in the VoIP world could have the capability to fulfill the obligation? 3. Which component(s) of Core-Edge explain the discrepancy 13 between 1 and 2?
14 911/E911 Example Who Currently has/fulfills the Obligation? Communications Value Chain EQUIPMENT MANU- FACTUROR FACILITIES PROVIDER SERVICE PROVIDER FEATURE CPE CUSTOMER Current Obligation Identify emergency call and route to appropriate PSAP Provide call back information Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Provide location Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 14
15 911/E911 Example Who in the VoIP world could have the capability to fulfill the obligation? Communications Value Chain Obligation Identify emergency call and route to appropriate PSAP Provide call back information EQUIPMENT MANU- FACTUROR FACILITIES PROVIDER SERVICE PROVIDER FEATURE CPE CUSTOMER Provide location A VoIP in the backbone (e.g. AT&T) B1 Facility based IP Telephony (e.g. VoCable) B2 VoIP over Broadband (e.g. Vonage) C VoIP at the edge, no PSTN interaction 15
16 911/E911 Example Which component(s) of Core-Edge explain the Communications Value Chain EQUIPMENT MANU- FACTUROR discrepancy? FACILITIES PROVIDER SERVICE PROVIDER FEATURE CPE CUSTOMER Obligation Identify emergency call and route to appropriate PSAP Obligation Yes Yes Yes Capability A,B1 A,B1 A,B1,B2 C Core-Edge Session Control, Identifier Selection Provide call back information Obligation Capability Yes A,B1,B2 Yes A,B1 Yes A,B1,B2 B2,C B2,C Core-Edge Session Control, Location Detection, Identifier Selection Provide location Obligation Capability Yes A,B1 Yes A,B1 Yes A,B1, B2 Yes A,B1, B2,C Yes A,B1,B2,C B2,C Core-Edge Session Control, Location Detection, Location Administration 16 A- VoIP in the backbone B1 Facilities based B2 VoIP over Broadband C VoIP at the edge, IP Telephony no PSTN interaction
17 CALEA Example Which component(s) of Core-Edge explain the Communications Value Chain EQUIPMENT MANU- FACTUROR discrepancy? FACILITIES PROVIDER SERVICE PROVIDER FEATURE CPE CUSTOMER Obligation Provide callidentifying information Obligation Yes Yes Yes Yes Capability A,B1 A,B1 A,B1,B2 A,B1, B2,C B1, B2 B2,C Core-Edge Session Control, Security, Identifier Selection Provide content tracing (lawful intercept) capability Obligation Capability Core-Edge Yes A,B1,B2 Yes Yes Yes A,B1 A,B1,B2* A, B2*,C** B2*,C** Session Control, Security, Location Detection B2+,C+ Ensure security and privacy Obligation Capability Core-Edge Yes A,B1 Yes A,B1 Yes A,B1,B2* Yes A,B1, B2*,C** B1,B2*,C** Session Control, Security, Location Detection, Location Administration B2+,C+ * = must collaborate with the BB provider ** - Technical Feasibility Concerns +,+ = Security/Privacy 17 A- VoIP in the backbone B1 Facilities based B2 VoIP over Broadband C VoIP at the edge, IP Telephony no PSTN interaction
18 This kind of analysis helps us think about 1. Is meeting the obligation technically feasible at a reasonable cost? 2. Which entity or entities should logically have the obligation? 3. Do we have the legal bases for imposing the obligation? As an entity in the VoIP value chain, if you had to meet the social regulatory obligations (e.g. 911/E911, CALEA, Disability Access, Universal Service) Q. What will be your technical challenges? Q. Will you have collaborate with anyone to meet the obligation? Q. What would be the cost? Q. Will you have a competitive advantage due to meeting an obligations? Q. Is there a market based solution to these regulatory issues? Q. What happens to the cots functions with the functions moving to the edge? 18
19 Work in Progress Part IV Regulatory Outcome And The Core-Edge Challenges and Opportunities
20 Impact of Regulations on Core- Edge Movement Challenges to Evolution of Technology Core-Edge Movement Regulatory Outcome Business challenges and opportunities 20
21 Challenges to Evolution of Technology Control over which functions is necessary to meet the regulatory goal? Can this be achieved without 1. Challenging the design principles 2. Curtailing innovation Example Challenges the Design Principles Curtails Innovation Movement to the Core Retransmission Control Session Control Location Administration Q. Can you think of sub optimal design decisions that might result due to regulatory obligation? Q. What kinds of regulatory outcome will lead to less innovation? 21
22 Business Challenges to Opportunities at the Core-Edge What challenges and opportunities a regulatory outcome presents at the core vs. edge? e.g. AT&T (VoIP in the backbone), Pulver.Com FWD Rulings (VoIP at the edge, no PSTN interaction) Q. What kinds of threats and opportunities do you see at the core vs. the edge? Q. Can you think of business decisions made due to regulatory uncertainty, and not due to market or technology reasons? 22
23 EXTRA
24 CALEA Current Obligations 1. Provide call-identifying information 2. Provide content tracing (lawful intercept) capability 3. Ensure security and privacy VoIP Challenges 1. Call-identification Information unknown to the service provider 2. Tension between wiretap, security, privacy and innovation 24
25 Disability Access Current Obligations 1. Manufacture accessible telecommunications equipment and CPE 2. Provide relay service (TRS, IP, VRS etc.) 3. Do not install network features, functions or capabilities not compliant with disability access requirement VoIP Challenges 1. Standardization of multimode communications 2. Funding multimode communications VoIP Opportunities 1. Multimode means more people served 2. Functional Equivalency through video 25
26 Universal Service Current Obligations/Benefits 1. Contribution to the USF 2. Receive subsidy from the USF VoIP Challenges 1. Should VoIP support the USF? 2. Should the USF support VoIP? 26
27 Inter-Carrier Compensation Current Schemes 1. Access Charges 2. Reciprocal Compensation 3. Voluntary Negotiations Questions for VoIP (ICC) 1. Should there be ICC? 2. Should the rate be uniform across the providers? 3. What should the rate be? VoIP Challenges 1. IP agnostic to physical media exacerbates the already existing arbitrage opportunities 2. Signaling and bearer (content) separation 27
28 Numbering What directly affects Numbering? Choose a number in any area code Keep your number when moving VoIP Challenges Policy Assignment, Relief, Exhaust, Utilization and Forecasting Usage Assumptions about ownership, association with geographic area and the rate center Technical Number Portability Service Provider, Location and Service Portability between PSTN and VoIP 28
29 Rulings AT&T s Phone-to-Phone IP Telephony Service (FCC 04-97) Petition: AT&T s Phone-to-Phone IP Telephony Services are exempt from access charges Decision: AT&T s specific service is a Telecommunications Service Access Charges apply to AT&T s specific service 29
30 Rulings Pulver.com s Free World Dialup (FWD) Petition: Pulver.com s FWD is neither Telecommunications nor a Telecommunications Service Decision: Pulver.com s FWD is neither Telecommunications nor a telecommunications service Furthermore, FWD is an unregulated Information Service subject to the Commission s jurisdiction 30
Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Exploring the Coreness of VoIP Control Points
Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Exploring the Coreness of VoIP Control Points Chintan Vaishnav [email protected] Core-Edge Working Group Communications s Program Massachusetts Institute of Technology
VoIP Regulation Klaus Nieminen Helsinki University of Technology [email protected]
VoIP Regulation Klaus Nieminen Helsinki University of Technology [email protected] Abstract Voice over IP (VoIP) is currently the uppermost telecommunication regulatory question globally. The purpose
Addendum StartPage: 0
Control Number : 39717 Item Number : 29 Addendum StartPage: 0 PROJECT NO. 39717 cz * s; ^^1^,jA lt RULEMAKING PROCEEDING PUBLIC UTILITY COMNIISj^; RELATED TO VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL (VoIP) OF TEXAS
INTERCONNECTED VOIP REGULATORY COMPLIANCE MANUAL
INTERCONNECTED VOIP REGULATORY COMPLIANCE MANUAL Prepared and maintained by: The CommLaw Group www.commlawgroup.com 1420 Spring Hill Road, Suite 205 McLean, VA 22102 Regulatory Compliance Guide for Telecommunications
KANSAS CORPORATION COMMISSION IP-to-IP Interconnection Report
KANSAS CORPORATION COMMISSION IP-to-IP Interconnection Report 2014 REPORT ON IP- TO- IP INTERCONNECTION A Summary of Status of the FCC s Internet Protocol- to- Internet Protocol Interconnection Proceeding
VoIP Overview Wayne Fonteix - AT&T Presented to: NARUC Committee on Telecommunications NARUC Committee on Finance and Technology February 25, 2003
VoIP Overview Wayne Fonteix - AT&T Presented to: NARUC Committee on Telecommunications NARUC Committee on Finance and Technology February 25, 2003 It is easier to stay out than get out. -- Mark Twain Current
Review Of The Commission Workplace (O1) And Its Role In SIP Interconnection Services
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Petition for Declaratory Ruling That tw telecom inc. Has The Right To Direct IP-to-IP Interconnection Pursuant To Section
Barbados Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Policy
Barbados Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Policy Policy in accordance with sections 4 (2)(b) and 4 (2)(f) of the Telecommunications Act Cap 282B. This policy describes the terms and outlines the techniques
VoIP and IP-IC Regulatory aspects
VoIP and IP-IC Regulatory aspects Giovanni Santella [email protected] What is VoIP? VoIP call scenarios (1) PC-to-PC PC-to-Phone VoIP call scenarios (2) Phone-to-Phone The value chain for the provision
Calling All Countries: The VoIP Revolution is Here!
Calling All Countries: The VoIP Revolution is Here! Panel: Sheba Chacko BT Global Services Tony Oliver Microsoft Corporation Andrew Powell Leap Wireless International, Inc. Agenda What is VoIP? Regulating
BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON D.C. 20554
BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON D.C. 20554 In the Matter of: ) ) Petition for Declaratory Ruling that pulver.com s ) Free World Dialup is neither Telecommunications ) WC Docket
Creating a Regulatory Framework for New Technologies
Creating a Regulatory Framework for New Technologies Pricing and Interconnection Challenges Calvin S. Monson Vice President Hong Kong December 2, 2006 Consortium The following consortium worked on the
VoIP. Voice over Internet Protocol Presentation to the IEE (Hong Kong) Lecture Theatre LT18, City University 22nd January 2005
VoIP Voice over Internet Protocol Presentation to the IEE (Hong Kong) Lecture Theatre LT18, City University 22nd January 2005 John Ure Associate Professor and Director Telecom Research Project, University
Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) - An Introduction
PITCOM Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) - An Introduction Peter Ingram Chief Technology Officer Ofcom 18th January 2005 Ofcom What is Voice over IP? Carrying Voice Traffic on Networks Designed for Data
CONSULTATION. National Numbering Plan Review. A short Consultation issued by the Telecommunications Regulatory Authority 28 August 2007
National Numbering Plan Review A short Consultation issued by the Telecommunications Regulatory Authority 28 August 2007 The address for responses to this document is: The General Director, Telecommunications
RESPONSE TO ECTEL s POLICY RECOMMENDATION. THE REGULATION OF VOICE over INTERNET PROTOCOL (VoIP) IP TELEPHONY REGULATION
RESPONSE TO ECTEL s POLICY RECOMMENDATION on THE REGULATION OF VOICE over INTERNET PROTOCOL (VoIP) IP TELEPHONY REGULATION May 2009 BY E-MAIL TO: [email protected] Introduction LIME is pleased to
FCC Regulatory Compliance Training
FCC Regulatory Compliance Training October 3, 2013 Federal Telecom Laws and Regulations Communications Act of 1934 Amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 FCC Regulations Rulemaking Notice of Inquiry
The IP Interconnection Debate: What is it and Why is it So Important?
The IP Interconnection Debate: What is it and Why is it So Important? Gillan Associates Joe Gillan WTA April 8, 2014 [email protected] 1 AT&T/Verizon IP is an information service, not subject to
Which of the following types of phone service does your company use for its primary means of voice communications
VoIP and the SMBs - Tapping the Market By Matt Delpercio Despite the benefits of IP telephony, only a small percentage of small to medium businesses (SMBs) use VoIP as their primary means of voice communications.
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 ) In the Matter of ) ) VONAGE HOLDINGS ) CORPORATION ) ) Petition for Declaratory Ruling ) WC Docket No. 03-211 Concerning an Order of
DEVELOPMENTS IN VOIP AND BROADBAND REGULATION
DEVELOPMENTS IN VOIP AND BROADBAND REGULATION John Nakahata Brita Strandberg Bruce Gottlieb Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis Copyright 2005 All Rights Reserved i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction...1 A.
VOIP AT THE CROSSROADS:
VOIP AT THE CROSSROADS: A ROADMAP OF CURRENT GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES REGARDING VOICE-OVER-THE-INTERNET SERVICES FEBRUARY 2004 In the telecommunications world, 2004 promises to be the year of Voice-over-the-Internet
Legal Alert: FCC Imposes Additional USF Contribution Obligations on Interconnected VoIP Providers, Increases Wireless Safe Harbor
Legal Alert: FCC Imposes Additional USF Contribution Obligations on Interconnected VoIP Providers, Increases Wireless Safe Harbor July 7, 2006 On June 27, 2006, the Federal Communications Commission (
Regulation of New Technologies: IP Telephony and Next Generation Networks
Regulation of New Technologies: IP Telephony and Next Generation Networks By Lawrence S M KWAN Seminar on Next Generation Networks and Telecommunication Regulations WuXi, China 25 26 August 2004 1 Outline
VoIP / SIP Planning and Disclosure
VoIP / SIP Planning and Disclosure Voice over internet protocol (VoIP) and session initiation protocol (SIP) technologies are the telecommunication industry s leading commodity due to its cost savings
AT&T VOICE OVER IP CONNECT SERVICE
AT&T Voice Over IP Connect Service Page 1 of 12 AT&T VOICE OVER IP CONNECT SERVICE This Attachment describes the various component service elements that comprise the Wholesale AT&T Voice Over IP Connect
Transparency Market Research
Transparency Market Research VoIP Services Market - Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends and Forecast, 2014-2020 Published Date 28 - August - 2014 114 Page Report Buy Now Request Sample
Voice over IP (VoIP) Past, Present Future. Alejandro de la Fuente Arash Jamshidi
Voice over IP (VoIP) Past, Present Future Alejandro de la Fuente Arash Jamshidi 1 VoIP History 1995: Vocaltec in Israel introduced the first VoIP product (InternetPhone) 1998: Less than 1% of calls in
TAC Memo VoIP Interconnection. September 24, 2012
TAC Memo VoIP Interconnection September 24, 2012 As part of the transition from TDM to VoIP, many service providers in the United States have considered the migration from TDM to IP Interconnections to
BUSINESS 33221 : ECONOMICS AND POLICY FOR TMT University of Chicago, GSB Austan Goolsbee Week 3
BUSINESS 33221 : ECONOMICS AND POLICY FOR TMT University of Chicago, GSB Austan Goolsbee Week 3 BROADBAND 1. What is it? US definition is at least 300 kbps Dial-up maximum 56 kbps, ISDN 144 kbps Available
Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Issues and Challenges William McCrum [email protected]
Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Issues and Challenges William McCrum Phone: +1 613-990-4493 Fax: Email: +1 613-957-8845 [email protected] Content Network Evolution and drivers VoIP Realizations
The Policy Implications of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP)
Please cite this paper as: OECD (2006), The Policy Implications of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 106, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/231664343117 OECD
ORDER 1370.108. National Policy. Effective Date 09/21/09. Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Security Policy SUBJ:
National Policy ORDER 1370.108 Effective Date 09/21/09 SUBJ: Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Security Policy 1. Purpose of This Order. This Order establishes the Federal Aviation Administration s (FAA)
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 COMMENTS OF THE NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF THE RATEPAYER ADVOCATE
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Telecommunications Relay Services and ) Speech-to-Speech Services for ) CG Docket No. 03-123 Individuals with Hearing
How Does Universal Service 911 Inter-Carrier Compensation Affect You?
Voice over Internet (Protocol) Kevin C. Schoen, President [email protected] This Presentation: What is VOI(P)? Universal Service 911 Inter-Carrier Compensation Who s ACD? Facilities based CLEC. Operates
FT networks, services and IS evolution perspectives towards convergence Patrice COLLET France Télécom Network, Carrier and IT Division
FT networks, services and IS evolution perspectives towards convergence Patrice COLLET France Télécom Network, Carrier and IT Division Networks, Carriers and IT France Télécom T vision Networks, Carriers
ATA: An Analogue Telephone Adapter is used to connect a standard telephone to a high-speed modem to facilitate VoIP and/or calls over the Internet.
KEY VOIP TERMS 1 ACD: Automatic Call Distribution is a system used to determine how incoming calls are routed. When the ACD system receives an incoming call it follows user-defined specifications as to
Submission by the Asia Pacific Carriers Coalition
Submission by the Asia Pacific Carriers Coalition In Response to Consultation Paper issued by TRAI on Relaxing Restrictive Provision of Internet Telephony (IPT) (Consultation Paper No. 11/08 issued on
SIP Trunking to Microsoft Lync (Skype for Business) Server
SIP Trunking to Microsoft Lync (Skype for Business) Server SIP Trunking to Lync/Skype for Business Server The emergence of Unified Communications integrating communications services into desktop and mobile
Packetized Telephony Networks
Packetized Telephony Networks Benefits of Packet Telephony Networks Traditionally, the potential savings on long-distance costs was the driving force behind the migration to converged voice and data networks.
VoIP Taxation and Regulatory Fees on the Rise: Your Guide to Compliance. Jonathan S. Marashlian
VoIP Taxation and Regulatory Fees on the Rise: Your Guide to Compliance Jonathan S. Marashlian Speaker Info: Jonathan Marashlian Jonathan S. Marashlian is the Managing Partner of The CommLaw Group and
BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION
BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION Investigation into Voice over Internet : Protocol as a Jurisdictional Service : : Docket No. M-00031707 : OFFICE OF CONSUMER ADVOCATE S COMMENTS Office
New FCC Regulations for Prepaid Card Providers
New FCC Regulations for Prepaid Card Providers NACT Telecommunications 1 Disclaimer This presentation has been made available by NACT Telecommunications to the general public for the purpose of alerting
Next Generation 9-1-1
Next Generation 9-1-1 Briefing to the North Dakota Public Safety and Transportation Committee October 15, 2009 Agenda Overview of Next Generation 9-1-1 Review of the North Dakota NG9-1-1 Planning Report
The Global Regulatory Struggle to Address IP Voice and Video Applications
The Global Regulatory Struggle to Address IP Voice and Video Applications Great Lawyers Will Find a Way To Turn the Tables in Your Favor Presented By Andrew D. Lipman Industry Convergence Communications
Goal We want to know. Introduction. What is VoIP? Carrier Grade VoIP. What is Meant by Carrier-Grade? What is Meant by VoIP? Why VoIP?
Goal We want to know Introduction What is Meant by Carrier-Grade? What is Meant by VoIP? Why VoIP? VoIP Challenges 2 Carrier Grade VoIP Carrier grade Extremely high availability 99.999% reliability (high
Presented by: John Downing, B.Eng, MBA, P.Eng
Presented by: John Downing, B.Eng, MBA, P.Eng John Downing co-founder of TrainingCity. VoIP Training Development Lead. VoIP & SIP Consultant to Telecom & Enterprise Clients. [email protected] 613-435-1170
STATE OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION PETITION. filing, and respectfully requests that the Commission determine and establish the charge and
STATE OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Illinois Telecommunications Access ) Corporation ) ) No. 11- Petition for annual line charge ) determination pursuant to 83 Ill. ) Adm. Code 755.500. ) PETITION
Methods for Lawful Interception in IP Telephony Networks Based on H.323
Methods for Lawful Interception in IP Telephony Networks Based on H.323 Andro Milanović, Siniša Srbljić, Ivo Ražnjević*, Darryl Sladden*, Ivan Matošević, and Daniel Skrobo School of Electrical Engineering
VoIP Service Provider Regulatory Compliance Guide:
VoIP Service Provider Regulatory Compliance Guide: Your Comprehensive Guide for Ensuring Compliance with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and State Regulations Applicable to Interconnected VoIP
Minnesota Public Utilities Commission Staff Briefing Papers
Minnesota Public Utilities Commission Staff Briefing Papers Meeting Date: Wednesday, August 13, 2003... Agenda Item # **1 Company: Docket No. Vonage Holdings Corporation P-6214/C-03-108 In the Matter of
BY: John B. Horrigan, Ph.D., Senior Research Specialist, (202-296-0019)
BY: John B. Horrigan, Ph.D., Senior Research Specialist, (202-296-0019) Allen Hepner, Advisory Board Member, New Millennium Research Council (202-263-2930) DATE: June 2004 DATA MEMO PEW INTERNET PROJECT
Regulatory Landscape: FCC Regulation of Non-Interconnected VoIP Services and the Cloud
Regulatory Landscape: FCC Regulation of Non-Interconnected VoIP Services and the Cloud Jonathan Marashlian Introduction Welcome to the uncertain regulatory universe of the Cloud Cloud-based communications
Deploying Media Probes in Evolving VoIP Networks
Deploying Media Probes in Evolving VoIP Networks Dave Gladwin [email protected] Presentation Template V4.00 Nov-05 Agenda! Convergence of Fixed and Mobile services are driving networks
IP Telephony and ENUM
NGN IP Telephony and ENUM APEC TEL 30 Next Generation Networks James Seng Assistant Director, Enabler Technologies What is Voice over IP? ) ) ) 1010101000010 1001010101010 1001010101010 0101010001001 TCP/IP
European Commission Consultation document on Voice over IP
STELLUNGNAHME European Commission Consultation document on Voice over IP This paper provides the eco comment on the European Commission consultation document. eco is the association of German internet
The Regulation of VoIP in Europe Trends across Member States
The Regulation of VoIP in Europe Trends across Member States Brussels, 11 March 2008 James Thomson Cullen International [email protected] Scope of Research VoIP regulation in 10 European
Sprint Relay Services
Sprint Relay Services Andrew Brenneman Sr. Account Executive Karl Ewan Customer Relations Manager February 10, 2006 Agenda What is Relay? Product Overview TRS CapTel VRS Internet RCC Relay Funding 101
