Transportation Education Series: Travel Demand Modeling. David Reinke November 2012



Similar documents
How To Plan A City Of Korea

Overview of the Travel Demand Forecasting Methodology

Ohio Standard Small/Medium MPO Travel Demand Forecasting Model. Theoretical Training May 10-11, 2006 Abridged to Freight Focus Sept 2010

The Fresno COG Travel Demand Forecasting Model How the Pieces Fit Together

Anchorage Travel Model Calibration and Validation

Simulating Traffic for Incident Management and ITS Investment Decisions

Practical Approach to Deriving Peak-Hour Estimates from 24-Hour Travel Demand Models

Incorporating Peak Spreading into a WebTAG Based Demand Model

HOW WILL PROGRESS BE MONITORED? POLICY AREA. 1. Implement the 2040 Growth Concept and local adopted land use and transportation plans

Hamilton Truck Route Study

NCHRP 8-84/Report 735: Long-Distance and Rural Transferable Parameters for Statewide Travel Forecasting Models

The World s Most Powerful and Popular Travel Forecasting Software

Summary Report. Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) (Philadelphia MPO) Travel Demand Model Peer Review

San Francisco Travel Demand Forecasting Model Development San Francisco County Transportation Authority Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

APPENDIX E TASK 5 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM: TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING PROCESS

Ideal Public Transport Fares

NCHRP 8-61 Travel Demand Forecasting: Parameters and Techniques

City of Rockville Regional Development Impacts: Transportation Capacity Analysis. June, 2013

Model Validation and Reasonableness Checking Manual

final report MAG Internal Truck Travel Survey and Truck Model Development Study Maricopa Association of Governments Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

A Framework for Monitoring the Performance of Travel Demand Management and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Reduction Activities

The Four Step Model UCI-ITS-WP Michael G. McNally

INDOT Long Range Plan

CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CONCEPTS

NCHRP Report 765 Overview. Rob Bostrom August 15, 2014 ARC Model Users Group

IDAHO STATEWIDE TRIP GENERATION RATES AND FRICTION FACTORS

MODELING TRANSPORTATION DEMAND USING EMME/2 A CASE STUDY OF HIROSHIMA URBAN AREA

Transportation Alternatives

About the Model. Unit. Cost Structure. Modal Characteristics

GUIDE TO SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE MEASURES

TRAVEL BEHAVIOR ISSUES RELATED TO NEO-TRADITIONAL DEVELOPMENTS A REVIEW OF THE RESEARCH

Technical Memorandum PERFORMANCE MEASURES. Prepared by:

Using MATSim for Public Transport Analysis

4-Step truck model: SCAG case study

Ne w J e r s e y Tr a f f i c Co n g e s t i o n :

Highway Capacity and Quality of Service

CHAPTER 5-CMPO TRANSPORTATION VISION PLANS (2035 & BEYOND)

5 Performance Measures

A Bicycle Accident Study Using GIS Mapping and Analysis

Back to School Car Safety. Direct Buy Warranty Staff September 19, 2014

TRANSPORTATION MODELLING IN CALGARY

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Final Long-Range Transportation Plan - Destination Attachment A

analysis needs be met at the push of a button?

PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS

Evolution of the Greater Vancouver Transportation Model. October 28-30, 1998

APPENDIX A Dallas-Fort Worth Region Transportation System Management Strategies and Projects

Section 6 Traffic Analysis

The world s most popular transportation modeling suite

California Statewide PECAS: Production Model. Shengyi Gao

Modelling Long-Distance Travel in the UK. Why is long-distance (LD) travel important for transport policy?

California Department of Transportation. Guidelines for Applying Traffic Microsimulation Modeling Software

MEMORANDUM. Robert Nichols, Acting Corridor Design Manager Northgate Link Extension

Transportation Impact Assessment Guidelines

Planning and Design for Sustainable Urban Mobility

USE OF STATE FLEET VEHICLE GPS DATA FOR TRAVEL TIME ANALYSIS

Transportation Planning Manual

2013 QUALITY/ LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK

BICYCLE TRENDS IN CAMBRIDGE

3. DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPUTER MODEL USED

Multi Modal Roadway Transportation Impact Fees and Asset Value

7.0 Transportation Management

Development of a Regional (short distance) Transport Model System in Norway

The New Mobility: Using Big Data to Get Around Simply and Sustainably

Data Collection and Sampling issues -Preparing Low Carbon Mobility Plan

The Northwest Arkansas Travel Demand Model

Infrastructure and Growth Leadership Advisory Group Ideas and Approaches Survey

REVIEW OF THE CURRENT DALLAS-FORT WORTH REGIONAL TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL

Chapter 9: Transportation

9988 REDWOOD AVENUE PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. April 24, 2015

School-related traffic congestion is a problem in

A Presentation by the Project Managers: Rick Canizales Prince William County. Jana Lynott, AICP Northern Virginia Transportation Commission

Examples of Transportation Plan Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures

Commuter Choice Certificate Program

Planning and Analysis Tools of Transportation Demand and Investment Development of Formal Transportation Planning Process

Current Use of Traffic Simulation and Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA) Models by MPOs. November 16, 2007

CAMPO TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL DOCUMENTATION. capital area metropolitan planning organization

TCRP Report 153: Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations. Part 2: Station Typology and Mode of Access Planning Tool

Centre SIM: Hour-by-hour travel demand forecasting for mobile source emission estimation

Modeling Network Traffic for Planning Applications in a Small Community

Transcription:

Transportation Education Series: Travel Demand Modeling David Reinke November 2012

Presentation overview What are travel demand models? Why use them? How do they work? What goes into building them? What are their limitations? Some further issues Questions/discussion

Some of our past experience Plus other areas of country Champaign/Urbana Boise Florida Puget Sound

Where does travel demand modeling fit in?

The problem Given a future projection: Land use (population, employment distribution) Highway and transit networks What will happen? Traffic volumes on individual roads Congested road segments, intersections Transit patronage by route Air pollution emissions

History: Ancient times (postwar pre 1950) Planning issues New highway investment Where to locate new highways Studies Local, regional studies Travel forecasts Trend projection on individual roadways

History: 1950s early 1960s Planning issues Regional growth New highway investment Studies Large scale regional studies (Chicago, Detroit) Travel forecasts Development of 4 step modeling process

History: Late 1960s 1980s Planning issues Regional growth New highway investment Environmental Protection Act (1969) Air quality stds New transit starts Studies Regional transportation plans Air quality inventories Transit alternatives analyses Travel forecasts Refinement of 4 step modeling process (UTPS, Tranplan, MINUTP) Introduction of disaggregate models into process

History: 1990s now Planning issues Air quality stds. Maintaining existing system Transit starts Congestion management, traffic mitigation at local level Studies Regional transportation plans Air quality inventories New transit starts Local general plans Traffic impact Travel forecasts Continued refinement of 4 step modeling process Increasing development of local models Land use models Activity based models

Types of transportation models Planning Provide information on transportation activity Travel demand model Traffic forecast model Software: Cube, TransCAD, EMME, Visum Operations Provide information on operation of transportation system Static capacity analysis Simulation of vehicles or groups of vehicles Software: Synchro, VISSIM, Paramics, Transmodeler

Integrated modeling Level of modeling appropriate for analysis required Macroscopic Evaluate large groupings of people/vehicles All activity occurs during a single time period (day, peak hour) Can cover large geographic area Example: Most travel demand forecast models Mesoscopic Evaluate smaller groups, time slices Useful when conditions change during time period Example: Freeway operations analysis for 4 hr peak Microscopic or Microsimulation Evaluate individual people/vehicles Useful when individual behavior affects system Example: Difficult freeway ramp weaving section

What is a Travel Demand Forecast Model? A systematic process for translating demand (people moving from one land use to another to do activities) and supply (available transportation systems) into projections of future travel demand

What is a model? A bookkeeping device Incorporates current knowledge of travel behavior Projects travel behavior into the future using Supply demand relationships derived from knowledge of travel behavior Future land use and transportation system configurations Examples of models Past experience Trend projection Computer simulation

Travel Demand Forecast Travel We have often called them traffic models Now need to account for other modes such as walking, bicycling Demand Models estimate how many people want to make the trips Not necessarily how many can make the trips when they want to Forecast Models do not replicate every nuance of existing travel Most important is reasonable response to future changes

How do we set up a travel model? Divide the region into smaller subareas (TAZs) Build a model of highway and transit networks (supply) Develop demand models using available data Household travel surveys Borrow models from other regions NCHRP 365

A Presentable Version of the Madera Model

What the Model Really Looks Like

Madera Model with Zones (Land Use Groupings)

Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZs) All land uses in TAZ (grey boundary) represented by a single point (red dot)

The 4 step process Trip based model Forecasts trips by type: Home work Home school Home shop Home other Other other Produces forecasts of: Vehicle trips on highway links Person trips on transit routes Trips on other modes (bike, walk)

4 step process

4 step process

Trip generation Trip production model approaches Trip rates: fixed rate per household type HH size Number of workers Number of autos Regression models based on TAZ population, income, etc. Trip attraction models Trips attracted to TAZ based on employment

Types of trips: depends on region, locality Home work Home school K 12 University Home shop Home social& recreational Home other Other other ( non home based )

Trip generation Different trip types Home work Home school Home shop Home other Other other Why? Different trip rates by type for different HH types Different trip length, mode choice characteristics

Trip distribution How many trips between zone i and j Function of # trips produced at production zone # trips attracted at attraction zone Impedance between zones Approaches Gravity model Destination choice model

Trip distribution gravity model

Friction factors

Trip distribution destination choice model

Mode choice Which travel mode will be used? Auto (drive alone, shared ride) Transit (bus, rail) Non motorized (bike, walk) Modern approach: probability choice model

Mode choice Not always included in travel models Some rural areas, cities do not have mode choice component

The fifth step of the four step process P/A tables by purpose O/D tables by time period Home work AM peak Attraction zone Dest zone 1 n 1 n P z 1 O z 1 r o r o o n i n d e n g e n Other other Off peak Attraction zone Dest zone 1 n 1 n P z 1 O z 1 r o d o n e n r i g o n e n

Trip assignment Highway, transit assignments Types: All or nothing (AON), equilibrium, capacity constrained, stochastic Highway assigns vehicle trips to road network (after factoring using auto occupancies) Transit assigns passengers to buses or trains uses AON Time of day (AM Peak 1 hour, 2 hour, etc, PM peak, Midday or Off Peak) after splitting daily trips into desired peak period

Trip assignment Route chosen based on shortest time/distance path, capacity constrained or equilibrium Factors affecting choice include road speed, length, capacity, level of congestion Uses speed flow relationship (curve) to do this (also called volume/delay function)

Volume delay function on a link: BPR curve

Trip assignments outputs Highway links Number of vehicles by type (drive alone, shared ride, truck) Travel time on link Transit links Number of passengers by transit line

Assignment output (example)

INPUTS FACTORS Trip Generation Rates Distribution Factors Mode Choice Coefficients/ Constants Auto Occupancy Factors Speed- Congestion Curves RESULTS Volumes Speeds LOS LAND USE DATA Housing Employment TRIP GENERATION Person Trips by Zone TRIP DISTRIBUTION Daily Traffic Zone-to-Zone Person Trips MODE CHOICE Zone-to-Zone Trips by Mode TRIP ASSIGNMENT Daily Air Daily Rail NETWORK INPUTS SHORTEST PATHS Daily Bus Estimated Travel Times The Real Process Define Model Area What happens at gateways? Code Transportation Networks Define Zone System Aggregate land uses Inventory Land Uses Hardest Step Calibration Formulas based on survey data Validation Compare model results to counts Forecast Inputs Land uses, networks Policy Framework Which assumptions should remain constant? Rarely Considered Adjust Model Results

More recent approach: Activity based models

Activity based models Sometimes called microsimulation demand or tour based models Travel is a derived demand Demand for travel arises from demand for other activities (work, shopping, social, etc.) Captures idea of trip chaining : models all legs of a tour

Tours vs trips Home Grocery shopping Pick up child at school Drop off child at school Home based work tour Work Eat lunch Work based subtour

Differences from traditional 4 step models Model works on a set of individuals rather than population aggregates Models tours first, individual trips second Outputs consist of set of trip patterns for a sample of individuals

Activity model steps 1. Generate a synthetic population 2. Apply travel models to each person in population to generate a set of tours 3. Aggregate tours into trip tables by time of day and mode 4. Assign trip tables to highway and transit networks

Types of tours Home based Mandatory (work, school) Maintenance (personal business, medical, shopping) Discretionary (social, recreational) Subtours Work based (e.g., visit a client, return to work) School based (e.g., go to job, return to school)

Advantages of activity based models Estimated on disaggregate data Therefore, more accurate representation of travel behavior Captures interdependency between trips on a tour Ability to disaggregate outputs by population groups Income Ethnicity Other special populations: seniors, handicapped, etc.

Concerns with activity based models Very data intensive Some needed data sources may not be around in the future: Census long form, PUMS/ACS data Very complex, usually with hundreds of parameters Danger of overfitting, poor predictive capability How much better do they actually perform? Hint: nobody really knows yet!

The bottom line: What is all this effort in aid of?

Uses of travel models Fulfill Requirements Air quality conformity Transit project funding applications State highway project requirements Now, Sustainable Community Strategies, etc Long Range Transportation Planning Regional transportation plans Design of new roads Passengers on new transit services Evaluate land use alternatives

Why Make it Complicated? Can t we just count cars? Okay for existing or short term only How about growth trends? No relation to future land uses Count cars and add known development on top? Okay for specific development studies (EIS) Can t easily account for interactions between future land uses (new housing + new jobs)

Travel Model Capabilities Can evaluate changes in travel by people who are already on the road Diversion to new road connection or transit service Diversions due to increased congestion New land use that will divert existing travel WalMart may divert from existing stores Evaluate several new developments that will interact with each other New housing plus new jobs Agencies use as database for consistency

Limitations of Travel Models

The basic limitation It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future. Yogi Berra

Travel Model Limitations Assume that past relationships will hold in future We still don t understand human behavior Grouping of people and land uses Travel models do not predict land use Sensitivity to non auto travel Sensitivity to urban form Difficult to get real world data

Planning objectives can change The future ain't what it used to be. Yogi Berra

Planning objectives Originally: where to build more roads Later on: Transit investments Air quality Local congestion mitigation Now: Environmental issues Safety Quality of life Sustainability Future: who knows?

Putting it all together: Evaluation

Where does travel demand modeling fit in?

Evaluation: the forgotten step Often spend too much time in forecasting, not enough time in evaluation Need to go into process with clear purpose: Goals Objectives Performance measures (these set information requirements from travel forecasting process)

Evaluation Need to have clear idea on how to make tradeoffs Capacity expansion vs. environmental goals Reduce delay vs. improving reliability Distributional effects (who gains, who pays) Benefit cost analysis Uses market values to help make tradeoffs Increasing use by MPOs (MTC, PSRC) Called for in MAP 21 David Quarmby: If you don t put values on things, someone else will do it for you

Our basis for understanding travel behavior: Household travel surveys

Household travel surveys Provide basic information for travel modeling Household characteristics Persons in household Trips made by each person Vehicles in household

Household travel survey steps Questionnaire Sample definition Pilot survey Refine questionnaire, sampling method Conduct interviews Process data: clean, edit, code Build database for further use

Sample development Typically: random sample of phone numbers May have different sample size for different subregions Special sampling to adequately represent some groups Elderly Minorities

Initial interview Contact household Secure agreement to participate Collect information on household & persons # persons # vehicles Age, sex, relation, occupation of each person in HH Information on each vehicle: make, model, year, fuel type, fuel efficiency Set travel day(s) Send diaries to household

Follow up interview(s) Collect trip information Formerly: limit to persons over 5 yrs old Now: all persons in household Go through diary: Origin, destination type (home, work, shop, etc.) Origin, destination location Begin, end trip time Travel mode (# persons in vehicle if rideshare) Amount paid (transit fare, toll, parking)

Data processing CATI almost universally used, so no need to code Still need to check data for consistency Setting up database with appropriate structure Household file Person file Trip file Vehicle file Location file (Caltrans) Codebook

Household survey travel gotchas Foreign area codes Wireless households Response rate, nonresponse bias Underreporting of trips Intermediate stops (e.g., between home and work) Nonwork trips Bike, walk trips Short trips

Some personal reflections We ll never be able to model travel behavior completely Accept limitations of models and supplement with other actions Past experience (post project evaluation) Negative feedback: monitoring Yogi Berra: You can observe a lot just by watching

Follow up questions David Reinke dreinke@kittelson.com 510.433.8085