Distributed File System Performance. Milind Saraph / Rich Sudlow Office of Information Technologies University of Notre Dame



Similar documents
New!! - Higher performance for Windows and UNIX environments

The Impact of Disk Fragmentation on Servers. By David Chernicoff

Virtuoso and Database Scalability

Business white paper. HP Process Automation. Version 7.0. Server performance

Online Remote Data Backup for iscsi-based Storage Systems

SERVER CLUSTERING TECHNOLOGY & CONCEPT

Chapter Introduction. Storage and Other I/O Topics. p. 570( 頁 585) Fig I/O devices can be characterized by. I/O bus connections

White Paper Open-E NAS Enterprise and Microsoft Windows Storage Server 2003 competitive performance comparison

Praktijkexamen met Project VRC. Virtual Reality Check

Fusionstor NAS Enterprise Server and Microsoft Windows Storage Server 2003 competitive performance comparison

Microsoft Windows Server 2003 with Internet Information Services (IIS) 6.0 vs. Linux Competitive Web Server Performance Comparison

Removing Performance Bottlenecks in Databases with Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Violin Memory Flash Storage Arrays. Red Hat Performance Engineering

LAN/Server Free* Backup Experiences

Terminal Server Software and Hardware Requirements. Terminal Server. Software and Hardware Requirements. Datacolor Match Pigment Datacolor Tools

HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS

Dynamode External USB3.0 Dual RAID Encloure. User Manual.

AIX NFS Client Performance Improvements for Databases on NAS

Hardware Requirements

Dragon Medical Enterprise Network Edition Technical Note: Requirements for DMENE Networks with virtual servers

Implementing Network Attached Storage. Ken Fallon Bill Bullers Impactdata

AuditMatic Enterprise Edition Installation Specifications

Enterprise Edition. Hardware Requirements

Arrow ECS sp. z o.o. Oracle Partner Academy training environment with Oracle Virtualization. Oracle Partner HUB

Maximize System Performance

HP reference configuration for entry-level SAS Grid Manager solutions

Microsoft Windows Server 2003 vs. Linux Competitive File Server Performance Comparison

Professional and Enterprise Edition. Hardware Requirements

Hardware and Software Requirements. Release 7.5.x PowerSchool Student Information System

System Requirements for Netmail Archive

EMC Backup and Recovery for Microsoft Exchange 2007 SP2

Performance Characteristics of VMFS and RDM VMware ESX Server 3.0.1

Network Attached Storage. Jinfeng Yang Oct/19/2015

Gigabit Ethernet Design

SAS Grid Manager Testing and Benchmarking Best Practices for SAS Intelligence Platform

MedInformatix System Requirements

Remote PC Guide Series - Volume 2b

Distributed RAID Architectures for Cluster I/O Computing. Kai Hwang

QHR Accuro EMR IT Hardware Requirements

Adaptec: Snap Server NAS Performance Study

DELL TM PowerEdge TM T Mailbox Resiliency Exchange 2010 Storage Solution

System Requirements. SuccessMaker 5

Performance, Reliability, and Operational Issues for High Performance NAS Storage on Cray Platforms. Cray User Group Meeting June 2007

Perforce with Network Appliance Storage

Priority Pro v17: Hardware and Supporting Systems

RAID. RAID 0 No redundancy ( AID?) Just stripe data over multiple disks But it does improve performance. Chapter 6 Storage and Other I/O Topics 29

Communicating with devices

A Performance Analysis of the iscsi Protocol

Enabling Technologies for Distributed Computing

Notes on Transferring 100 TB of Data Using Globus. William E. Mihalo; Anton Verlygo; Ryan K. Sisk Northwestern University

Increasing Server Storage and Capacity: Upgrading the Smart Array 3200 Controller to the Smart Array 4200 Controller

AFS Usage and Backups using TiBS at Fermilab. Presented by Kevin Hill

IOmark- VDI. Nimbus Data Gemini Test Report: VDI a Test Report Date: 6, September

Adonis Technical Requirements

Investigation of storage options for scientific computing on Grid and Cloud facilities

Handling Multimedia Under Desktop Virtualization for Knowledge Workers

F600Q 8Gb FC Storage Performance Report Date: 2012/10/30

Network Discovery Preparing for Installation

VIDEO SURVEILLANCE WITH SURVEILLUS VMS AND EMC ISILON STORAGE ARRAYS

Measuring Interface Latencies for SAS, Fibre Channel and iscsi

Cloud Storage. Parallels. Performance Benchmark Results. White Paper.

HP SN1000E 16 Gb Fibre Channel HBA Evaluation

Video Surveillance Storage and Verint Nextiva NetApp Video Surveillance Storage Solution

owncloud Enterprise Edition on IBM Infrastructure

HA Certification Document Armari BrontaStor 822R 07/03/2013. Open-E High Availability Certification report for Armari BrontaStor 822R

WHITE PAPER 1

Best Practices for Data Sharing in a Grid Distributed SAS Environment. Updated July 2010

Use of Hadoop File System for Nuclear Physics Analyses in STAR

Terms of Reference Microsoft Exchange and Domain Controller/ AD implementation

DIABLO TECHNOLOGIES MEMORY CHANNEL STORAGE AND VMWARE VIRTUAL SAN : VDI ACCELERATION

EMC Unified Storage for Microsoft SQL Server 2008

Submit to: PT. Adi Sarana Armada (Assa Rent) Proof of Concept (POC) of 2X Solution. Ver. 1.0 Mei Prepared by: PT. Netmarks Indonesia

Promise Pegasus R6 Thunderbolt RAID Performance

Fusion iomemory iodrive PCIe Application Accelerator Performance Testing

White Paper. Educational. Measuring Storage Performance

How To Evaluate Netapp Ethernet Storage System For A Test Drive

COMP 7970 Storage Systems

Installation and Configuration Guide for Cluster Services running on Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server using Acer Altos Servers

SUN FIRE X4450 SERVERS SCALING VIRTUAL DESKTOPS ON. Evaluating Performance and Capacity with VMware Infrastructure 3. White Paper March 2009.

MOSIX: High performance Linux farm

IBM TotalStorage Network Attached Storage 100

Cisco Small Business NAS Storage

HP Proliant BL460c G7

Enabling Technologies for Distributed and Cloud Computing

System Requirements for Microsoft Dynamics GP 9.0

RAID Storage, Network File Systems, and DropBox

Hardware, Software and Training Requirements for DMFAS 6

IOmark- VDI. HP HP ConvergedSystem 242- HC StoreVirtual Test Report: VDI- HC b Test Report Date: 27, April

Firebird and RAID. Choosing the right RAID configuration for Firebird. Paul Reeves IBPhoenix. mail:

Dragon NaturallySpeaking and citrix. A White Paper from Nuance Communications March 2009

Local Area Networks: Software

Post-production Video Editing Solution Guide with Microsoft SMB 3 File Serving AssuredSAN 4000

EMC Virtual Infrastructure for Microsoft Applications Data Center Solution

System Requirements for Microsoft Dynamics GP 10.0

Future technologies for storage networks. Shravan Pargal Director, Compellent Consulting

Network Performance Optimisation and Load Balancing. Wulf Thannhaeuser

Sun 8Gb/s Fibre Channel HBA Performance Advantages for Oracle Database

Adaptec: Snap Server NAS Performance Study

Remote PC Guide Series - Volume 2a

System Requirements. Version 8.2 November 23, For the most recent version of this document, visit our documentation website.

Cluster Implementation and Management; Scheduling

Transcription:

Distributed File System Performance Milind Saraph / Rich Sudlow Office of Information Technologies University of Notre Dame

Questions to answer: Why can t you locate an AFS file server in my lab to improve my performance? What kind of performance improvement can I expect if I use a 100 Mb/s network interface? What are the performance differences of shared vs switched ethernets? What are the performance differences of various RAID levels? How should disks be striped for the best performance? Are all RAID arrays equivalent? If and when we move migrate to DCE/DFS, what are the performance implications?

Questions to answer: (cont.) What are the effects of the server CPU speed on my client performance? Is it worthwhile to purchase MP server machines? How many AFS/NFS translators are needed to serve Mac/ PC clients? How are the translators best configured? Our tests are an attempt at obtaining data in order to answer some of these questions.

Current Configuration: AFS Servers: 9 Sun Ultra Enterprise Servers (5) 2/1170, (3) 2/2170, (1) 2/1200 with 128 MB RAM 1 Sun SPARCserver 20/71 with 96 MB RAM Approximately 500 GB disk space 5 Servers have Sun Model 112, 63 GB SSA (RAID 0) 2 have Sun Model 101 31.5 GB SSA (RAID 0) 1 has a Sun Model 210 controller 18 x 2.1 GB disks (RAID 0+1) 1 has a MTI 9300 126 GB RAID Array (RAID 5) All AFS servers use a single 100 Mb/s network interface.

Current Configuration: (cont.) AFS Translators (serving Mac and PC clients): 8 AFS/NFS Sun SPARCserver 20/71 1 processor ( 75 MHZ SuperSPARC, 1 MB cache) 512 MB RAM 2 x 1.05 Fast SCSI-2 disks 1 AFS/AFP Sun SPARCserver 20/71 1 processor ( 75 MHZ SuperSPARC, 1 MB cache) 256 MB RAM 2 x 1.05 Fast SCSI-2 disks All AFS Translators use a single 100 Mb/s network interface.

Current Configuration: (cont.) AFS Clients: Approximately 400 Sun workstations 60 RS6K workstations, (16 node IBM SP1, 14 node IBM SP2) 30 SGI workstations, (12 node Origin 2000) Hundreds of PCs and Macs via translators. Most dorms networked. OIT provides software for AFS access. AFS Volumes: Approximately 10,000 active volumes; volumes range in size from 50 MB - 20 GB.

Current Configuration: (cont.) DCE Test Cell A single server Sun SPARCserver 20 DCE/DFS test cell, migration plans in progress. NFS Email spooler A 8 processor Ultra Enterprise 4000 which acts as a general time share machine in addition to being the NFS mail spooler for approximately 220 Unix clients. Note: Another 4 processor Ultra Enterprise 4000 also acts as a email server utilizing a AFS based server running POP.

Test Configuration: ( NFS/AFS/DFS ) File Servers (1) Sun Ultra Enterprise 4000 4 Processor (167 MHZ, 512K cache), 512 MBRAM, Sun SPARCstorage Array Model 112 Array with 2.1 GB disks 2 x 2.1 GB 7200 RPM FW SCSI-2 internal disks (1) Sun Ultra Enterprise 2/1170 1 Processor (167 MHZ, 512K cache), 128 MB RAM, 2 x 2.1 GB 7200 RPM FW SCSI-2 internal disks Sun SPARCstorage Array Model 112 Array with 2.1 GB disks (1) Sun Ultra Enterprise 2/1200 1 Processor (200 MHZ, 1MB cache), 128 MB RAM, 2 x 2.1 GB 7200 RPM FW SCSI-2 internal disks Sun SPARCstorage Array Model 112 Array with 2.1 GB disks

Test Configuration: (cont.) Clients (6) Sun Ultra 1 Model 140 workstations 1 processor (143 MHZ, 512 K cache), 64 MB RAM 1.05 GB Fast SCSI-2 internal disk 10/100 Mb/s Sbus Card Network interface for clients and servers David Systems 10 Mb/s shared Hub Cisco Catalyst 5000 switch 10 Mb/s switched 12 port card 100 Mb/s switched 12 port card

Tests: I/O Performance Diskrate program from Convex (now HP). Flushed sequential reads/writes for 1, 4 and 16 and 64 MB file. RAID 0 stripes of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 disks on SSA Model 112 & single internal disk. Tests of UFS, NFS, AFS, AFS/NFS, DFS and DFS/NFS clients. Network Performance Netperf 2.1 from HP (UDP, TCP throughput and UDP, TCP transactions) varying socket sizes and number of clients.

Results / Conclusions: Test results can be found at: http://www.nd.edu/~rich/decorum97 Realistic benchmarks of your cell are essential Simple reproducible tests allow you to develop a knowledge base for future capacity planning and problems. The data which you obtain dispels myths and allows more intelligent and informed communication with management and customers.