PAYROLL DEPARTMENT BENCHMARKS AND ANALYSIS 2015 2016 Essential research and metrics on payroll operations, resources and performance



Similar documents
PAYROLL DEPARTMENT BENCHMARKS AND ANALYSIS

HR DEPARTMENT BENCHMARKS AND ANALYSIS

Maximizing the Advantages Avoiding the Pitfalls

Bloomberg BNA S Guide to. Payroll. in California, New York, Ohio and Pennsylvania: Administering Payroll in America s Most Challenging States

EMPLOYER BARGAINING OBJECTIVES 2013 ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

HR Staff and Structure Results U.S. Human Capital Effectiveness Report 2010/2011. SARATOGA a service offering of PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP

ROBERT L. MATHIS JOHN H. JACKSON. Presented by: Prof. Dr. Deden Mulyana, SE.,M,Si.

Human Resources Department FTE s

Iowa State University University Human Resources Classification and Compensation Unit 3810 Beardshear Hall

COVERAGE: All Employees

TABLE OF CONTENTS{PRIVATE } PAGE

OUTSOURCING HUMAN RESOURCES FUNCTIONS

AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT INTERNAL AUDIT DEPARTMENT HUMAN RESOURCE AUDIT PROGRAM

HALOGEN SOFTWARE INC. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER. oversee the qualifications and independence of the independent auditor;

Schneps, Leila; Colmez, Coralie. Math on Trial : How Numbers Get Used and Abused in the Courtroom. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books, p i.

BNA & NAEM EHS Benchmark Report 2010

ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES SAMPLE MANUAL

Sample Human Resource Metrics

DENTSPLY INTERNATIONAL INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES/POLICIES

$6,251 $17,545 THE KAISER FAMILY FOUNDATION - AND - HEALTH RESEARCH & EDUCATIONAL TRUST. Employer Health Benefits. Annual Survey.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CHAPTER 704, STAFFING REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG AND ALCOHOL TREATMENT ACTIVITIES

Organization and Operations. Metric Name Formula Description

INTRODUCTION I. CONSTITUTION

Corporate Governance Statement

RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. Office of Human Resources Program Work Plan Draft - August 1999

CHARTER OF THE FINANCE AND AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF SPECTRAL DIAGNOSTICS INC.

Registered Nurses. Population

JOB OPENINGS AND LABOR TURNOVER APRIL 2015

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY EMPLOYMENT DATA PROTECTION STANDARDS

CITY OF BEATRICE, NEBRASKA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (LB840)

SHARED ASSESSMENTS PROGRAM STANDARD INFORMATION GATHERING (SIG) QUESTIONNAIRE 2014 MAPPING TO OCC GUIDANCE ( ) ON THIRD PARTY RELATIONSHIPS

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER TITLE PAGE

TECHNICAL SUPPORT COST RATIOS

THE BOARD OF VISITORS OF VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY POLICY GOVERNING FINANCIAL OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT

HRStaffers. Your best resource to strengthen your company. Human Resource Process Solutions.

CLASS TITLE: EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY SPECIALIST 1

I. GENERAL PROVISIONS II. KEY DEFINITIONS

NAPCS Product List for NAICS 54161: Management Consulting Services

TWO-YEAR COLLEGE FACULTY SALARY SURVEY

Human Resources Management Series

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PAYROLL PROCESSING SERVICES TO MEMBERS OF THE GEORGIA MUNICIPAL ASSOCIATION

SCOPE OF WORK FOR PERFORMING INTERNAL CONTROL AND STATUTORY/REGULATORY COMPLIANCE AUDITS FOR RECIPIENTS OF SPECIAL MUNICIPAL AID

Pennsylvania Technical Assistance Program (PennTAP)

3 BUSINESS ACCOUNTING STANDARD,,INCOME STATEMENT I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Office of Graduate Medical Education Salary and Benefits Information

Top 7 Reasons Your Company Should Be Using a Contractor Payroll Specialist

Supporting Effective Compliance Programs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Plaintiff DIVISION "D" JUDGE McNAMARA v.

UNIVERSITY of HOUSTON MANUAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

CHAPTER 4 EFFECTIVE INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER PAYROLL

Northern Delaware Intergroup Bylaws January 2010

Agenda Item #06-29 Effective Spring 2007 Eastern Illinois University Revised Course Proposal MGT 4500, Employee Staffing and Development

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER DESCRIPTION PAGE

Errors & omissions Product overview. get there together

LRS The Lawyer Referral

Contingent Workers & Independent Contractors: Avoiding Misclassification Pitfalls. Presented by David Long-Daniels Greenberg Traurig, LLP

The U.S. Call Center Industry 2004: National Benchmarking Report

University of Kentucky Retirement Plans (Approved by the Board of Trustees)

Strategic Planning & Budget Council Human Resources Sub-Group. Human Resources Staffing Master Plan

Financial Services Guidance Note Outsourcing

SURVEY ON LABOUR MARKET FLEXIBILITY IN SERVICES, SLOVENIA

LOUISIANA BOARD OF REGENTS ENDOWED SUPERIOR GRADUATE STUDENT SCHOLARSHIPS SUBPROGRAM POLICY AND GUIDELINES

Wellness. Marathon Petroleum Wellness Program

FERRARI N.V. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER (Effective as of January 3, 2016)

Institute of Actuaries of India Subject CT3 Probability and Mathematical Statistics

Directors may, from time to time, direct.

Fund for Public Health in New York 291 Broadway, 17th Floor, New York, NY Phone: (212) Fax: (212)

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS IN THE UNITED STATES MARCH 2015

Oracle ERP Support Benchmark Findings

UA Scholars. University of Alaska Scholars Program. Program Information Booklet

PREMIER STATE TAX LIBRARY :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Screen Design : Navigation, Windows, Controls, Text,

Great Lakes Region of the American Music Therapy Association Students Bylaws

CLASS FAMILY: Business Operations and Administrative Management

Managing Co-Employment Risks

Technical notes INTRODUCTION

Real Estate Investment Management Agreement Sample Outline

, , FY

HR Metrics Report. Reporting Period 2013 Q1 - January 1 to March 31, Sample Report. Province: Industry: Workforce Change:

2012 Metrics and Analytics: Patterns of Use and Value. research. A report by WorldatWork and Mercer July 2012

CONSTITUTION. with a view to speaking with a single voice on matters of importance, declare their intent to constitute themselves into an association.

jobsdb Compensation and Benefits Survey Report 2015

What s in This Report? 4 Section 1. Quantitative Data... 4 Section 2. Qualitative Data... 4 Section 3. Appendices... 4

College Governance Statement of Principles, Scheme of Delegation and Terms of Reference

THE PEO ADVANTAGE. What is a Professional Employer Organization?

DRAFT NETWORK SERVICE LICENCE APPLICATION FORM PRESCRIBED APPLICATION FORM FOR AN ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION NETWORK SERVICE LICENCE

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Audit Committee Charter

2002 Census of Government Employment Methodology

Temporary Employment Hiring Manager Guidelines

THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE NOTICE OF RULEMAKING

ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER (and Error Resolution) DISCLOSURE (Rev. Nov. 6, 2008)

M E M O R A N D U M. DATE: September 1, Prospective Vendors. Russell Guindon, Senior Deputy Fiscal Analyst Fiscal Analysis Division

JOB DESCRIPTION. ** 1. Screens and approves capital expenditures to be proposed in the annual budget.

Human Resources

Cyber security standard

SEC Adopts Whistleblower Rules Under Dodd-Frank

Collective Bargaining Agreement. Writers Guild of America, East and Gawker Media

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE UNIVERSITY STUDENT UNION FISCAL POLICY

$6,025 $16,834 THE KAISER FAMILY FOUNDATION - AND - HEALTH RESEARCH & EDUCATIONAL TRUST. Employer Health Benefits. -and- Annual Survey

Human Resources Policy on Emergency Disaster Preparedness

Transcription:

PAYROLL DEPARTMENT BENCHMARKS AND ANALYSIS 2015 2016 Essential research and metrics on payroll operations, resources and performance

Payroll Department Benchmarks and Analysis 2015-2016 A

Payroll Department Benchmarks and Analysis 2015-2016 ISBN 978-1-63359-058-8 This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought. From a Declaration of Principles, jointly adopted by a Committee of the American Bar Association and a Committee of Publishers and Associations. For inquiries about purchasing multiple copies of this report, please contact: Matthew Sottong, Surveys Manager (msottong@bna.com)

s Table of Contents List of Figures... Acknowledgements... About the Authors... Executive Summary... vi xiii xiv xv Introduction Overview... 3 Definitions of Terms... 4 Study Design, Methodology and Presentation... 5 Profile of Participating Employers... 6 Chapter 1 Payroll Operations and Parameters Overview... 11 Oversight of the Payroll Department... 12 Domestic and International Operations... 14 Pay Cycles... 17 Tax Deposits... 20 Time-Worked Submissions... 21 Chapter 2 Payroll Systems, Automation and Outsourcing Overview... 25 Forms of Payment and Pay Advice... 26 Time-Worked Submission Methods... 29 Payroll Automation and Technology... 31 Perspectives on Payroll Automation and Technology... 34 Payroll Outsourcing... 40 Perspectives on Payroll Outsourcing Initiatives... 46 iii

Payroll Department Benchmarks and Analysis 2015-2016 Chapter 3 Payroll Department Staffing Overview... 49 Payroll Department Staff Ratios... 50 Notes on the Calculation of Payroll Staff Ratios... 55 Summary of Payroll Staff Ratios in Charts and Tables... 56 Payroll Staff Composition, Specialists and Changes... 67 Chapter 4 Payroll Department Budgets Overview... 73 Separate Payroll Department Budgets... 74 Budgeted Changes in Payroll Department Expenditures... 78 Payroll Department Expenditures per Employee... 83 Payroll Department Expenditures per Payment... 94 Payroll Department Staff Salaries... 105 Chapter 5 Routine Payroll Transactions Overview... 109 New Hire Enrollment in Payroll System... 110 Payroll System Cutoff to Payday... 122 Garnishment Orders... 134 Removal of Terminated Employees from Payroll System... 145 Chapter 6 Payroll Errors, Inquiries and Fraud Overview... 159 Errors in Time-Worked Submissions... 160 Incidence of Payroll Processing Errors... 173 A Few Notes on Payroll Processing Error Rates... 182 Cost of Payroll Processing Errors... 187 Resolution of Payroll Errors... 188 iv

Incidence of Manual Payments... 198 Incidence of Payroll Inquiries... 209 Cost of Payroll Inquiries... 220 Resolution of Payroll Inquiries... 221 Payroll Fraud... 223 Chapter 7 Payroll Evaluation and Cost Containment Overview... 227 Benchmarking the Payroll Department... 228 Cost Containment and Efficiency Initiatives... 230 Perspectives on Cost Containment, Efficiency Initiatives... 233 v

Payroll Department Benchmarks and Analysis 2015-2016 s List of Figures Chapter 1 Payroll Operations and Parameters Figure 1-1 Where Does the Payroll Department Report?... 12 Figure 1-2 States and Countries in Which Employees Are Paid... 14 Figure 1-3 Pay Cycles... 17 Figure 1-4 Frequency of Tax Deposits... 20 Figure 1-5 Time-Worked Submissions Reported by Exception... 21 Chapter 2 Payroll Systems, Automation and Outsourcing Figure 2-1 Means of Issuing Payment and Pay Advice... 26 Figure 2-2 Means of Time-Worked Submissions... 29 Figure 2-3 Level of Payroll Technology and Automation... 31 Figure 2-4 Payroll Systems and Features... 36 Figure 2-5 Tax Filing and Reporting Software/Systems... 38 Figure 2-6 Degree of Payroll Outsourcing... 40 Figure 2-7 Outsourced Payroll Functions and Activities... 42 Figure 2-8 Payroll Outsourcing Costs per Employee, 2013... 43 Figure 2-9 Budgeted Payroll Outsourcing Costs per Employee, 2014... 44 Figure 2-10 Budgeted Change in Outsourcing Expenditures: 2013-2014... 45 Chapter 3 Payroll Department Staffing Figure 3-1 Change in Payroll Department Staff Levels... 51 Figure 3-2 Payroll Staff Ratios, by Workforce Size... 52 Figure 3-3 Payroll Staff Ratios, by Industry... 58 Figure 3-4 Payroll Staff Ratios, by Number of States and Countries in Which Employees Are Paid... 60 Figure 3-5 Payroll Staff Ratios, by Pay Cycle... 62 vi

Figure 3-6 Payroll Staff Ratios, by Percentage of Workforce Receiving Electronic Pay Advice... 63 Figure 3-7 Payroll Staff Ratios, by Percentage of Time-Worked Submissions Filed Electronically... 64 Figure 3-8 Payroll Staff Ratios, by Level of Technology and Automation in Payroll. 65 Figure 3-9 Payroll Staff Ratios, by Level of Outsourcing... 66 Figure 3-10 Composition of Payroll Department Staff... 67 Chapter 4 Payroll Department Budgets Figure 4-1 Payroll Department Budgets, by Workforce Size... 74 Figure 4-2 Payroll Department Budgets, by Industry... 76 Figure 4-3 Budgeted Change in Payroll Department Expenditures, 2013-2014... 78 Figure 4-4 Budgeted Change in Payroll Department Expenditures, by Workforce Size... 79 Figure 4-5 Budgeted Change in Payroll Department Expenditures, by Select Industry Classifications... 81 Figure 4-6 Budgeted Payroll Department Expenditure per Employee, by Workforce Size... 83 Figure 4-7 Budgeted Payroll Department Expenditure per Employee, by Industry. 85 Figure 4-8 Budgeted Payroll Department Expenditure per Employee, by Number of States and Countries in Which Employees Are Paid... 87 Figure 4-9 Budgeted Payroll Department Expenditure per Employee, by Pay Cycle... 89 Figure 4-10 Budgeted Payroll Department Expenditure per Employee, by Percentage of Workforce Receiving Electronic Pay Advice... 90 Figure 4-11 Budgeted Payroll Department Expenditure per Employee, by Percentage of Time-Worked Submissions Filed Electronically... 91 Figure 4-12 Budgeted Payroll Department Expenditure per Employee, by Level of Technology and Automation in Payroll... 92 Figure 4-13 Budgeted Payroll Department Expenditure per Employee, by Degree of Outsourcing... 93 vii

Payroll Department Benchmarks and Analysis 2015-2016 Figure 4-14 Payroll Department Expenditure per Payment, by Workforce Size... 94 Figure 4-15 Payroll Department Expenditure per Payment, by Industry... 96 Figure 4-16 Payroll Department Expenditure per Payment, by Number of States and Countries in Which Employees Are Paid... 98 Figure 4-17 Payroll Department Expenditure per Payment, by Pay Cycle... 100 Figure 4-18 Payroll Department Expenditure per Payment, by Percentage of Workforce Receiving Electronic Pay Advice... 101 Figure 4-19 Payroll Department Expenditure per Payment, by Percentage of Time-Worked Submissions Filed Electronically... 102 Figure 4-20 Payroll Department Expenditure per Payment, by Level of Technology and Automation in Payroll... 103 Figure 4-21 Payroll Department Expenditure per Payment, by Degree of Outsourcing... 104 Chapter 5 Routine Payroll Transactions Figure 5-1 Business Days from Hire Date to Payroll System Entry, by Workforce Size... 111 Figure 5-2 Business Days from Hire Date to Payroll System Entry, by Industry... 113 Figure 5-3 Business Days from Hire Date to Payroll System Entry, by Number of States and Countries in Which Employees Are Paid... 115 Figure 5-4 Business Days from Hire Date to Payroll System Entry, by Pay Cycle.. 117 Figure 5-5 Business Days from Hire Date to Payroll System Entry, by Percentage of Time-Worked Submissions Filed Electronically... 118 Figure 5-6 Business Days from Hire Date to Payroll System Entry, by Payroll Automation and Features... 119 Figure 5-7 Business Days from Hire Date to Payroll System Entry, by Degree of Outsourcing... 121 Figure 5-8 Business Days from Payroll System Cutoff to Payday, by Workforce Size... 123 Figure 5-9 Business Days from Payroll System Cutoff to Payday, by Industry... 125 viii

Figure 5-10 Business Days from Payroll System Cutoff to Payday, by Number of States and Countries in Which Employees Are Paid... 127 Figure 5-11 Business Days from Payroll System Cutoff to Payday, by Pay Cycle.. 129 Figure 5-12 Business Days from Payroll System Cutoff to Payday, by Percentage of Time-Worked Submissions Filed Electronically... 130 Figure 5-13 Business Days from Payroll System Cutoff to Payday, by Payroll Automation and Features... 131 Figure 5-14 Business Days from Payroll System Cutoff to Payday, by Degree of Outsourcing... 133 Figure 5-15 Business Days from Garnishment Order to Withholding, by Workforce Size... 135 Figure 5-16 Business Days from Garnishment Order to Withholding, by Industry.. 136 Figure 5-17 Business Days from Garnishment Order to Withholding, by Number of States and Countries in Which Employees Are Paid... 139 Figure 5-18 Business Days from Garnishment Order to Withholding, by Pay Cycle... 140 Figure 5-19 Business Days from Garnishment Order to Withholding, by Percentage of Time-Worked Submissions Filed Electronically... 141 Figure 5-20 Business Days from Garnishment Order to Withholding, by Payroll Automation and Features... 143 Figure 5-21 Business Days from Garnishment Order to Withholding, by Degree of Outsourcing... 144 Figure 5-22 Business Days from Termination to Removal from Payroll System, by Workforce Size... 146 Figure 5-23 Business Days from Termination to Removal from Payroll System, by Industry... 147 Figure 5-24 Business Days from Termination to Removal from Payroll System, by Number of States and Countries in Which Employees Are Paid... 150 Figure 5-25 Business Days from Termination to Removal from Payroll System, by Pay Cycle... 151 ix

Payroll Department Benchmarks and Analysis 2015-2016 Figure 5-26 Business Days from Termination to Removal from Payroll System, by Percentage of Time-Worked Submissions Filed Electronically... 152 Figure 5-27 Business Days from Termination to Removal from Payroll System, by Payroll Automation and Features... 154 Figure 5-28 Business Days from Termination to Removal from Payroll System, by Degree of Outsourcing... 155 Chapter 6 Payroll Errors, Inquiries and Fraud Figure 6-1 Time-Worked Submission Errors, by Workforce Size... 161 Figure 6-2 Time-Worked Submission Errors, by Industry... 163 Figure 6-3 Time-Worked Submission Errors, by Number of States and Countries in Which Employees Are Paid... 165 Figure 6-4 Time-Worked Submission Errors, by Pay Cycle... 167 Figure 6-5 Time-Worked Submission Errors, by Percentage of Time-Worked Submissions Filed Electronically... 168 Figure 6-6 Time-Worked Submission Errors, by Payroll Automation and Features. 171 Figure 6-7 Time-Worked Submission Errors, by Degree of Outsourcing... 172 Figure 6-8 Payroll Processing Error Rates, by Workforce Size... 174 Figure 6-9 Payroll Processing Error Rates, by Industry... 176 Figure 6-10 Payroll Processing Error Rates, by Number of States and Countries in Which Employees Are Paid... 179 Figure 6-11 Payroll Processing Error Rates, by Pay Cycle... 180 Figure 6-12 Payroll Processing Error Rates, by Percentage of Time-Worked Submissions Filed Electronically... 183 Figure 6-13 Payroll Processing Error Rates, by Payroll Automation and Features. 185 Figure 6-14 Payroll Processing Error Rates, by Degree of Outsourcing... 186 Figure 6-15 Average Business Days to Resolve Payroll Error, by Workforce Size.. 189 Figure 6-16 Average Business Days to Resolve Payroll Error, by Industry... 191 Figure 6-17 Average Business Days to Resolve Payroll Error, by Number of States and Countries in Which Employees Are Paid... 193 x

Figure 6-18 Average Business Days to Resolve Payroll Error, by Pay Cycle... 194 Figure 6-19 Average Business Days to Resolve Payroll Error, by Percentage of Time-Worked Submissions Filed Electronically... 195 Figure 6-20 Average Business Days to Resolve Payroll Error, by Payroll Automation and Features... 196 Figure 6-21 Average Business Days to Resolve Payroll Error, by Degree of Outsourcing... 197 Figure 6-22 Incidence of Manual Payments, by Workforce Size... 199 Figure 6-23 Incidence of Manual Payments, by Industry... 201 Figure 6-24 Incidence of Manual Payments, by Number of States and Countries in Which Employees Are Paid... 203 Figure 6-25 Incidence of Manual Payments, by Pay Cycle... 205 Figure 6-26 Incidence of Manual Payments, by Percentage of Time-Worked Submissions Filed Electronically... 206 Figure 6-27 Incidence of Manual Payments, by Payroll Automation and Features. 207 Figure 6-28 Incidence of Manual Payments, by Degree of Outsourcing... 208 Figure 6-29 Payroll-Related Inquiries per Employee, by Workforce Size... 210 Figure 6-30 Payroll-Related Inquiries per Employee, by Industry... 212 Figure 6-31 Payroll-Related Inquiries per Employee, by Number of States and Countries in Which Employees Are Paid... 214 Figure 6-32 Payroll-Related Inquiries per Employee, by Pay Cycle... 215 Figure 6-33 Payroll-Related Inquiries per Employee, by Percentage of Time- Worked Submissions Filed Electronically... 216 Figure 6-34 Payroll-Related Inquiries per Employee, by Payroll Automation and Features... 218 Figure 6-35 Payroll-Related Inquiries per Employee, by Degree of Outsourcing... 219 Figure 6-36 Average Business Days to Resolve a Payroll Inquiry, by Workforce Size... 221 Figure 6-37 Incidence of Payroll Fraud... 223 xi

Payroll Department Benchmarks and Analysis 2015-2016 Chapter 7 Payroll Evaluation and Cost Containment Figure 7-1 Does the Payroll Department Benchmark its Performance?... 228 Figure 7-2 Sources of Benchmarking Metrics... 229 Figure 7-3 Cost Containment and Efficiency Initiatives... 231 xii

s Acknowledgements We wish to extend our thanks to the many payroll executives and professionals who participated in this year s Payroll Benchmarks survey. This report would not have been possible without their willingness to complete the comprehensive survey questionnaire, despite their considerable professional duties and obligations. We are very grateful for their participation. We also would like to thank Michael Baer of Bloomberg BNA for his invaluable assistance during the research and questionnaire design phases of the project, as well as for his perspective on the report s content and analysis. As always, we are indebted to Fonda Jarrett and Mike Wright of Bloomberg BNA for their diligent, conscientious and professional work on the design, layout and publication of this report. xiii

Payroll Department Benchmarks and Analysis 2015-2016 s About the Authors The following individuals contributed to the study design, data collection, analysis, writing, copyediting and production of this report. Matthew R. Sottong Research Director and Managing Editor Andrew J. Hellwege Survey Research Analyst Cordelia Gaffney Graphics Director J. Michael Reidy Consulting Editor xiv

Introduction s Overview Bloomberg BNA s Payroll Department Benchmarks and Analysis 2015-2016 is a comprehensive survey-based report on payroll operations, staffs, budgets, responsibilities and performance. Based on the results of an in-depth survey questionnaire, the report s narrative and graphics provide extensive research and analyses across a broad spectrum of topics and measures, including: s payroll operations and parameters, including oversight of the payroll department, extent of domestic and international operations, pay cycles and means of time-worked submissions; s payroll staffing and expenditures, particularly per capita measures of staff levels and budgets; s payroll systems, technology and automation; s outsourcing of payroll functions and activities; s speed and efficiency of routine payroll transactions; s incidence and resolution of payroll errors, inquiries and fraud; and s evaluation and benchmarking of the payroll department. This report is the second iteration of Bloomberg BNA s most extensive survey research and analysis on the payroll function, conducted among more than 200 payroll professionals nationwide in 2014. The report s extensive narrative is accompanied by more than 100 charts and tables, notes on methodology and perspectives pieces on the experiences, challenges and accomplishments of payroll departments and professionals. 3

Payroll Department Benchmarks and Analysis 2015-2016 s Definitions of Terms Please note the following definitions of several terms used throughout this report. Average The average, or mean, is the sum of all values divided by the number of values or observations in the data set or series. Median The median is the midpoint or middle value within a set of figures arranged in numerical order. That is, half the numbers in a set fall above the median and the other half below it. Medians are often used in statistical analyses to help ensure that a few extreme values in a range of numbers do not distort the results. Values at the extremes ( outliers ) tend to have a much greater impact on the mean than on the median. Central range or midrange The central range or midrange refers to the range between the 25 th percentile (first quartile) and the 75 th percentile (third quartile) in a numerical series. Fifty percent of the values fall within this range. Twenty-five percent fall below the 25 th percentile figure and 25 percent lie above the 75 th percentile mark. The central range or midrange (the middle 50 percent) might be characterized as a broad representation of the most common or prevalent percentages, ratios or amounts. Full-time equivalent (FTE) In this report, full-time equivalents are used primarily to adjust for the full-time or part-time status of workers in comparisons of staff levels in the payroll department. Therefore, a payroll office with three full-time employees (3.0 FTEs) and three half-time employees (3 x 0.5=1.5 FTEs) has 4.5 full-time equivalent workers. Employee headcount The total number of employees in an organization s workforce (not including contractors, temporaries or contingent workers) regardless of full-time or part-time status. A company with 110 full-time workers and 17 part-time employees has an employee headcount of 127. 4

Introduction s Study Design, Methodology, and Presentation Bloomberg BNA s Payroll Department Benchmarks and Analysis 2015-2016 is based on an extensive survey conducted among payroll professionals and executives in 2014, drawn from a sample of payroll professionals in Bloomberg BNA s nationwide database. The survey was conducted over a secure website, with several reminders to respond. As an incentive to participate, respondents receive a copy of the full survey report. A total of 230 respondents provided usable data for analysis. Several steps were taken to ensure that survey participants responses would remain confidential. As noted above, the survey was hosted on a secure website to ensure that information submitted by respondents could not be observed or obtained by third parties. Respondents were assured that neither individual respondents nor the organizations they represented would be identified without express permission from the participants. Apart from those exceptions, only aggregate data and statistics are presented and analyzed in this report. 5

Payroll Department Benchmarks and Analysis 2015-2016 s Profile of Participating Employers The responding payroll professionals represent a wide variety of enterprises, institutions and industries, as the summary data below demonstrates. Manufacturing 22% Basic manufacturing 7% Intermediate manufacturing 4% Advanced manufacturing 11% Nonmanufacturing 53% Business, personal and miscellaneous services 16% Retail and wholesale trade 11% Finance, insurance and real estate 8% Transportation, warehousing and utilities 7% Information services, telecommunications and data processing 4% Consulting 3% Construction 3% Other * Nonbusiness 26% Health care 11% Government 7% Education 6% Membership organizations and associations 1% Other * Workforce Size (Total employee headcount) Fewer than 250 employees 11% 250 to 499 employees 8% 500 to 999 employees 10% 1,000 to 2,499 employees 19% 2,500 or more employees 50% No response 2% Region Northeast 17% South 30% North Central 33% West 19% No response * 6

Introduction Union Status Union-represented employees 37% Non-union 60% No response 3% *Less than 0.5 percent. 7

About Bloomberg BNA Bloomberg BNA delivers specialized information to human resources, legal, business, and government professionals at every level of expertise. As the leading independent publisher of print and electronic news, analysis, and reference products, Bloomberg BNA has provided intensive coverage of new developments for more than 75 years. An extensive network of more than 500 Bloomberg BNA editors, reporters, and correspondents, posted at federal, state and international government offices, courts and other key locations, ensures that you have timely information and expert analysis of the issues that matter most. Our authoritative, nonpartisan publications are recognized for their editorial excellence and objectivity. See why Bloomberg BNA s fast, reliable HR answers make us the most trusted information leader in the industry. Visit www.bna.com/hr to learn more. 1801 S. Bell Street Arlington, VA 22202 800.372.1033 bna.com 2015 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS, INC.