Trends in Part C & D Star Rating Measure Cut Points

Trends in Part C & D Star Rating Measure Cut Points Updated 11/18/2014

Document Change Log Previous Version Description of Change Revision Date - Initial release of the 2015 Trends in Part C & D Star Rating Measure Cut Points document 11/18/2014 (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page i

Table of Contents DOCUMENT CHANGE LOG... I TABLE OF CONTENTS... II INTRODUCTION... 1 PART C MEASURES... 2 Measure: C01 - Colorectal Cancer Screening... 2 Measure: C02 - Cardiovascular Care Cholesterol Screening... 3 Measure: C03 - Diabetes Care Cholesterol Screening... 4 Measure: C04 - Annual Flu Vaccine... 5 Measure: C05 - Improving or Maintaining Physical Health... 6 Measure: C06 - Improving or Maintaining Mental Health... 7 Measure: C07 - Monitoring Physical Activity... 8 Measure: C08 - Adult BMI Assessment... 9 Measure: C10 - Care for Older Adults Medication Review... 10 Measure: C11 - Care for Older Adults Functional Status Assessment... 11 Measure: C12 - Care for Older Adults Pain Assessment... 12 Measure: C13 - Osteoporosis Management in Women who had a Fracture... 13 Measure: C14 - Diabetes Care Eye Exam... 14 Measure: C15 - Diabetes Care Kidney Disease Monitoring... 15 Measure: C16 - Diabetes Care Blood Sugar Controlled... 16 Measure: C17 - Diabetes Care Cholesterol Controlled... 17 Measure: C18 - Controlling Blood Pressure... 18 Measure: C19 - Rheumatoid Arthritis Management... 19 Measure: C20 - Improving Bladder Control... 20 Measure: C21 - Reducing the Risk of Falling... 21 Measure: C22 - Plan All-Cause Readmissions... 22 Measure: C23 - Getting Needed Care... 23 Measure: C24 - Getting Appointments and Care Quickly... 24 Measure: C25 - Customer Service... 25 Measure: C26 - Rating of Health Care Quality... 26 Measure: C27 - Rating of Health Plan... 27 Measure: C28 - Care Coordination... 28 Measure: C29 - Complaints about the Health Plan... 29 Measure: C30 - Members Choosing to Leave the Plan... 30 Measure: C32 - Plan Makes Timely Decisions about Appeals... 31 Measure: C33 - Reviewing Appeals Decisions... 32 PART D MEASURES... 33 Measure: D01 - Appeals Auto Forward... 33 Measure: D02 - Appeals Upheld... 35 Measure: D03 - Complaints about the Drug Plan... 37 Measure: D04 - Members Choosing to Leave the Plan... 39 Measure: D06 - Rating of Drug Plan... 41 Measure: D07 - Getting Needed Prescription Drugs... 43 Measure: D09 - High Risk Medication... 45 Measure: D10 - Diabetes Treatment... 47 Measure: D11 - Medication Adherence for Diabetes Medications... 49 Measure: D12 - Medication Adherence for Hypertension (RAS antagonists)... 51 Measure: D13 - Medication Adherence for Cholesterol (Statins)... 53 (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page ii

Introduction One of CMS most important strategic goals is to improve quality of care and general health status for Medicare beneficiaries, and we continue to make enhancements to the current Star Ratings methodology to further align it with our policy goals. Predetermined 4-star thresholds were first introduced to the CY2011 Star Ratings for a subset of the performance measures as an attempt to help contracts set achievement goals. CMS predetermined 4-star thresholds are based on analysis of historical trends in plans performance in a specific measure and aimed to drive quality improvement across all plans. CMS continued to set additional predetermined 4-star thresholds over time as more measures developed adequate performance history. In the 2013 Request for Comments, we proposed moving from the current scoring methodology to a new methodology for the 2016 Star Ratings where the predetermined measure thresholds would be removed. For measures that previously had predetermined thresholds, starting in 2016 we will follow the methodology we currently use for measures without predetermined thresholds. The current specifications and methodology for all measures is available at: http://go.cms.gov/partcanddstarratings. While CMS initial intention for establishing predetermined 4-star thresholds was to create clear expectations about performance and to give plans specific measure-level targets to achieve, we no longer feel it necessary to set artificial thresholds for quality. The Star Ratings program has continued to evolve since being introduced by CMS in 2006. Plan sponsors have more experience with CMS rating system and our expectations of high performance. Additionally, CMS provides the industry up to two years of advance notice of potential future changes through an annual Request for Comments and the Call Letter process. For the 201 Ratings, nineteen measures did not have a predetermined threshold. The 4-star thresholds were set for 22 out of 33 (67%) Part C measures and only 5 out of 13 (38%) Part D measures. Along with contributing to misclassification in star assignments, the presence of 4-star thresholds also creates perverse incentives in encouraging plans to concentrate their resources on measures with fixed known thresholds instead of focusing on a more holistic approach of higher quality for all measures. Our analysis of the 2014 Ratings showed that on average only 32% of contracts improved across the 23 Part C measures with 4-star thresholds, compared to 52% of contracts that improved across the eight Part C measures without 4-star thresholds. For Part D, on average, only 21% of contracts showed improvement across the five measures with 4-star thresholds, while 56% of contracts showed improvement across the five Part D measures without 4-star thresholds. In the graphs of the measures that have a predetermined threshold, the 4-star threshold appears as a flat horizontal line, in contrast to the other stars cut points for that measure that have changed over time. Using the 201 Ratings, our analysis showed that on average only 28% of contracts improved across the 20 Part C measures with 4-star thresholds included in the improvement measure, compared to 51% of contracts that improved across the nine Part C measures without 4-star thresholds. We found similar findings for Part D, where on average, only 24% of contracts showed improvement across the five measures with 4-star thresholds included in the improvement measure, while 63% of contracts showed improvement across the five Part D measures without 4-star thresholds. In this document, we display graphical trends of star cut points at the measure level, along with each measure s definition, data source, and whether or not there has been a preset threshold for each measure. Over the years, unless there were specification changes, we generally see gradual changes in star cut points. This relative stability in cut points from year to year should enable plans to establish a baseline for performance for each measure. Note: The Medicare Plan Finder (MPF) pricing measures is not included due to changes in measure specifications and the narrow range of thresholds. The Special Needs Plan (SNP) Care Management measure is also not included since it is a first year measure. (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 1

Part C Measures Measure: C01 - Colorectal Cancer Screening Colorectal Cancer Screening 66 67 65 65 40 30 37 58 58 58 58 51 52 47 49 40 41 35 20 10 0 Percent of plan members aged - who had appropriate screening for colon cancer HEDIS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 37% 37% to < 47% 47% to < 58% 58% to < 66% 58% 66% 2013 < 35% 35% to < 51% 51% to < 58% 58% to < 67% 58% 67% 2014 < 40% 40% to < 49% 49% to < 58% 58% to < 65% 58% 65% 2015 < 41% 41% to < 52% 52% to < 58% 58% to < 65% 58% 65% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 2

Measure: C02 - Cardiovascular Care Cholesterol Screening Cardiovascular Care Cholesterol Screening 95 91 89 89 89 85 85 85 85 85 83 81 82 65 77 66 78 78 55 Percent of plan members with heart disease who have had a test for bad (LDL) cholesterol within the past year. HEDIS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 77% 77% to < 81% 81% to < 85% 85% to < 91% 85% 91% 2013 < 66% 66% to < % % to < 85% 85% to < 89% 85% 89% 2014 < 78% 78% to < 83% 83% to < 85% 85% to < 89% 85% 89% 2015 < 78% 78% to < 82% 82% to < 85% 85% to < 89% 85% 89% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 3

Measure: C03 - Diabetes Care Cholesterol Screening 95 Diabetes Care Cholesterol Screening 93 91 85 65 77 85 85 85 85 83 83 81 81 81 79 69 55 Percent of plan members with diabetes who have had a test for bad (LDL) cholesterol within the past year. HEDIS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 77% 77% to < 81% 81% to < 85% 85% to < % 85% % 2013 < 69% 69% to < 81% 81% to < 85% 85% to < % 85% % 2014 < 79% 79% to < 83% 83% to < 85% 85% to < 93% 85% 93% 2015 < 81% 81% to < 83% 83% to < 85% 85% to < 91% 85% 91% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 4

Measure: C04 - Annual Flu Vaccine 40 30 20 10 0 Annual Flu Vaccine 76 78 79 71 71 71 68 65 65 69 64 65 Percent of plan members who got a vaccine (flu shot) prior to flu season. CAHPS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < % % to < 65% 65% to < 71% 71% to < 76% 71% 76% 2013 < % % to < 65% 65% to < 71% 71% to < % 71% % 2014 < 64% 64% to < 68% 68% to < 71% 71% to < 78% 71% 78% 2015 < 65% 65% to < 69% 69% to < % % to < 79% Not predetermined 79% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 5

Measure: C05 - Improving or Maintaining Physical Health Improving or Maintaining Physical Health 68 66 67 68 54 56 59 59 59 57 58 58 40 Percent of all plan members whose physical health was the same or better than expected after two years. HOS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 54% 54% to < 56% 56% to < % % to < 68% % 68% 2013 < 57% 57% to < 59% 59% to < % % to < 66% % 66% 2014 < 58% 58% to < 59% 59% to < % % to < 67% % 67% 2015 < 58% 58% to < 59% 59% to < % % to < 68% % 68% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 6

Measure: C06 - Improving or Maintaining Mental Health Improving or Maintaining Mental Health 95 88 86 86 89 85 85 85 85 85 81 79 76 76 73 65 Percent of all plan members whose mental health was the same or better than expected after two years. HOS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < % % to < % % to < 85% 85% to < 88% 85% 88% 2013 < 73% 73% to < 79% 79% to < 85% 85% to < 86% 85% 86% 2014 < 76% 76% to < 81% 81% to < 85% 85% to < 86% 85% 86% 2015 < 76% 76% to < % % to < 85% 85% to < 89% 85% 89% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 7

Measure: C07 - Monitoring Physical Activity Monitoring Physical Activity 62 64 63 51 52 51 53 40 47 44 43 45 30 Percent of senior plan members who discussed exercise with their doctor and were advised to start, increase or maintain their physical activity during the year. HEDIS / HOS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 47% 47% to < 51% 51% to < % % to < 85% % % 2013 < 44% 44% to < 52% 52% to < % % to < 62% % 62% 2014 < 43% 43% to < 51% 51% to < % % to < 64% % 64% 2015 < 45% 45% to < 53% 53% to < % % to < 63% % 63% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 8

Measure: C08 - Adult BMI Assessment Adult BMI Assessment 73 61 61 89 77 68 93 77 87 84 40 30 42 52 20 27 25 10 0 Percent of plan members with an outpatient visit who had their Body Mass Index (BMI) calculated from their height and weight and recorded in their medical records. HEDIS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 27% 27% to < 42% 42% to < 61% 61% to < 73% Not predetermined 73% 2013 < 25% 25% to < % % to < 61% 61% to < % Not predetermined % 2014 < 52% 52% to < 68% 68% to < 77% 77% to < 89% Not predetermined 89% 2015 < 77% 77% to < 84% 84% to < 87% 87% to < 93% Not predetermined 93% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 9

Measure: C10 - Care for Older Adults Medication Review Care for Older Adults Medication Review 82 92 92 87 67 81 63 65 71 40 30 45 44 51 53 20 24 10 0 Percent of plan members whose doctor or clinical pharmacist has reviewed a list of everything they take (prescription and non-prescription drugs, vitamins, herbal remedies, other supplements) at least once a year. (This information about a yearly review of medications is collected for Medicare Special Needs Plans only. These plans are a type of Medicare Advantage Plan designed for certain types of people with Medicare. Some Special Needs Plans are for people with certain chronic diseases and conditions, some are for people who have both Medicare and Medicaid, and some are for people who live in an institution such as a nursing home.) HEDIS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 24% 24% to < 45% 45% to < 67% 67% to < 82% Not predetermined 82% 2013 < 44% 44% to < 63% 63% to < 81% 81% to < 92% Not predetermined 92% 2014 < 51% 51% to < 65% 65% to < % % to < 92% Not predetermined 92% 2015 < 53% 53% to < 71% 71% to < % % to < 87% Not predetermined 87% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 10

Measure: C11 - Care for Older Adults Functional Status Assessment Care for Older Adults Functional Status Assessment 78 89 87 83 73 62 54 62 59 40 30 20 10 22 43 29 30 42 49 0 Percent of plan members whose doctor has done a functional status assessment to see how well they are able to do activities of daily living (such as dressing, eating, and bathing). (This information about the yearly assessment is collected for Medicare Special Needs Plans only. These plans are a type of Medicare Advantage Plan designed for certain types of people with Medicare. Some Special Needs Plans are for people with certain chronic diseases and conditions, some are for people who have both Medicare and Medicaid, and some are for people who live in an institution such as a nursing home.) HEDIS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 22% 22% to < 43% 43% to < 62% 62% to < 78% Not predetermined 78% 2013 < 29% 29% to < 54% 54% to < % % to < 89% Not predetermined 89% 2014 < 30% 30% to < 42% 42% to < 62% 62% to < 87% Not predetermined 87% 2015 < 49% 49% to < 59% 59% to < 73% 73% to < 83% Not predetermined 83% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 11

Measure: C12 - Care for Older Adults Pain Assessment Care for Older Adults Pain Assessment 87 78 91 76 88 78 40 30 59 34 56 41 36 52 20 10 24 27 0 Percent of plan members who had a pain screening or pain management plan at least once during the year. (This information about pain screening or pain management is collected for Medicare Special Needs Plans only. These plans are a type of Medicare Advantage Plan designed for certain types of people with Medicare. Some Special Needs Plans are for people with certain chronic diseases and conditions, some are for people who have both Medicare and Medicaid, and some are for people who live in an institution such as a nursing home.) HEDIS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 24% 24% to < 34% 34% to < 59% 59% to < 87% Not predetermined 87% 2013 < 27% 27% to < 41% 41% to < 56% 56% to < 78% Not predetermined 78% 2014 < 36% 36% to < 52% 52% to < 76% 76% to < 91% Not predetermined 91% 2015 < % % to < % % to < 78% 78% to < 88% Not predetermined 88% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 12

Measure: C13 - Osteoporosis Management in Women who had a Fracture Osteoporosis Management in Women who had a Fracture 67 67 76 40 30 20 10 14 24 24 38 16 36 20 29 0 Percent of female plan members who broke a bone and got screening or treatment for osteoporosis within 6 months. HEDIS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 14% 14% to < 24% 24% to < % % to < 67% % 67% 2013 < 24% 24% to < 38% 38% to < % % to < 67% % 67% 2014 < 16% 16% to < 36% 36% to < % % to < % % % 2015 < 20% 20% to < 29% 29% to < % % to < 76% % 76% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 13

Measure: C14 - Diabetes Care Eye Exam Diabetes Care Eye Exam 73 81 77 64 64 64 64 54 54 53 53 40 46 47 41 30 Percent of plan members with diabetes who had an eye exam to check for damage from diabetes during the year. HEDIS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 46% 46% to < 54% 54% to < 64% 64% to < 73% 64% 73% 2013 < 47% 47% to < 54% 54% to < 64% 64% to < 81% 64% 81% 2014 < 41% 41% to < 53% 53% to < 64% 64% to < % 64% % 2015 < 53% 53% to < % % to < 64% 64% to < 77% 64% 77% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 14

Measure: C15 - Diabetes Care Kidney Disease Monitoring Diabetes Care Kidney Disease Monitoring 95 89 89 94 85 74 85 85 85 85 83 82 83 83 82 78 65 Percent of plan members with diabetes who had a kidney function test during the year. HEDIS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 74% 74% to < 83% 83% to < 85% 85% to < 89% 85% 89% 2013 < 78% 78% to < 82% 82% to < 85% 85% to < % 85% % 2014 < % % to < 83% 83% to < 85% 85% to < 89% 85% 89% 2015 < 82% 82% to < 83% 83% to < 85% 85% to < 94% 85% 94% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 15

Measure: C16 - Diabetes Care Blood Sugar Controlled Diabetes Care Blood Sugar Controlled 88 88 84 86 68 64 61 40 30 43 41 48 20 10 0 Percent of plan members with diabetes who had an A-1-C lab test during the year that showed their average blood sugar is under control. HEDIS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 43% 43% to < % % to < % % to < 88% % 88% 2013 < 41% 41% to < 68% 68% to < % % to < 88% % 88% 2014 < 48% 48% to < 64% 64% to < % % to < 84% % 84% 2015 < 61% 61% to < % % to < % % to < 86% % 86% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 16

Measure: C17 - Diabetes Care Cholesterol Controlled Diabetes Care Cholesterol Controlled 40 30 20 10 66 20 62 59 53 53 53 53 48 49 43 44 41 34 31 0 Percent of plan members with diabetes who had a cholesterol test during the year that showed an acceptable level of bad (LDL) cholesterol. HEDIS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 20% 20% to < 43% 43% to < 53% 53% to < 66% 53% 66% 2013 < 34% 34% to < 48% 48% to < 53% 53% to < % 53% % 2014 < 31% 31% to < 44% 44% to < 53% 53% to < 59% 53% 59% 2015 < 41% 41% to < 49% 49% to < 53% 53% to < 62% 53% 62% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 17

Measure: C18 - Controlling Blood Pressure Controlling Blood Pressure 71 77 40 30 63 63 63 63 49 53 49 53 43 42 37 20 29 10 0 Percent of plan members with high blood pressure who got treatment and were able to maintain a healthy pressure. HEDIS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 29% 29% to < 49% 49% to < 63% 63% to < 71% 63% 71% 2013 < 43% 43% to < 53% 53% to < 63% 63% to < % 63% % 2014 < 37% 37% to < 49% 49% to < 63% 63% to < 77% 63% 77% 2015 < 42% 42% to < 53% 53% to < 63% 63% to < % 63% % (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 18

Measure: C19 - Rheumatoid Arthritis Management Rheumatoid Arthritis Management 84 86 83 88 78 78 78 78 71 66 66 71 40 54 49 51 30 Percent of plan members with Rheumatoid Arthritis who got one or more prescription(s) for an anti-rheumatic drug. HEDIS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 54% 54% to < 71% 71% to < 78% 78% to < 84% 78% 84% 2013 < 49% 49% to < 66% 66% to < 78% 78% to < 86% 78% 86% 2014 < 51% 51% to < 66% 66% to < 78% 78% to < 83% 78% 83% 2015 < % % to < 71% 71% to < 78% 78% to < 88% 78% 88% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 19

Measure: C20 - Improving Bladder Control Improving Bladder Control 71 71 71 40 30 20 34 41 36 36 31 31 33 40 10 0 Percent of plan members with a urine leakage problem who discussed the problem with their doctor and got treatment for it within 6 months. HEDIS / HOS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 34% 34% to < 41% 41% to < % % to < % % % 2013 < 31% 31% to < 36% 36% to < % % to < 71% % 71% 2014 < 31% 31% to < 36% 36% to < % % to < 71% % 71% 2015 < 33% 33% to < 40% 40% to < % % to < 71% % 71% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 20

Measure: C21 - Reducing the Risk of Falling Reducing the Risk of Falling 76 67 71 73 40 59 59 59 59 55 53 54 55 48 49 30 Percent of plan members with a problem falling, walking or balancing who discussed it with their doctor and got treatment for it during the year. HEDIS / HOS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 48% 48% to < 55% 55% to < 59% 59% to < 76% 59% 76% 2013 < 49% 49% to < 53% 53% to < 59% 59% to < 67% 59% 67% 2014 < % % to < 54% 54% to < 59% 59% to < 71% 59% 71% 2015 < % % to < 55% 55% to < 59% 59% to < 73% 59% 73% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 21

Measure: C22 - Plan All-Cause Readmissions 40 Plan All-Cause Readmissions 35 32 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 21 17 17 13 14 13 12 11 11 11 9 9 5 3 2 Percent of senior plan members discharged from a hospital stay who were readmitted to a hospital within 30 days, either for the same condition as their recent hospital stay or for a different reason. (Patients may have been readmitted back to the same hospital or to a different one. Rates of readmission take into account how sick patients were when they went into the hospital the first time. This risk-adjustment helps make the comparisons between plans fair and meaningful.) HEDIS Lower is better Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 > 32% > 17% to 32% > 12% to 17% > 5% to 12% Not predetermined 5% 2013 > 17% > 13% to 17% > 11% to 13% > 3% to 11% Not predetermined 3% 2014 > 21% > 14% to 21% > 11% to 14% > 9% to 11% Not predetermined 9% 2015 > 13% > 11% to 13% > 9% to 11% > 2% to 9% Not predetermined 2% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 22

Measure: C23 - Getting Needed Care Getting Needed Care 95 87 88 88 87 85 85 85 85 85 84 84 83 83 81 81 81 Percent of the best possible score the plan earned on how easy it is for members to get needed care, including care from specialists. CAHPS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 81% 81% to < 83% 83% to < 85% 85% to < 87% 85% 87% 2013 < 81% 81% to < 84% 84% to < 85% 85% to < 88% 85% 88% 2014 < 81% 81% to < 84% 84% to < 85% 85% to < 88% 85% 88% 2015 < % % to < 83% 83% to < 85% 85% to < 87% 85% 87% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 23

Measure: C24 - Getting Appointments and Care Quickly Getting Appointments and Care Quickly 95 85 79 79 79 Percent of the best possible score the plan earned on how quickly members get appointments and care. CAHPS 74 74 74 74 72 72 72 71 Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 71% 71% to < 74% 74% to < % % to < 79% % 79% 2013 < 72% 72% to < 74% 74% to < % % to < 79% % 79% 2014 < 72% 72% to < 74% 74% to < % % to < 79% % 79% 2015 < 72% 72% to < 74% 74% to < % % to < % % % (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 24

Measure: C25 - Customer Service Customer Service 95 91 91 91 85 84 88 88 88 88 86 86 86 86 85 85 84 Percent of the best possible score the plan earned on how easy it is for members to get information and help from the plan when needed. CAHPS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 84% 84% to < 86% 86% to < 88% 88% to < % 88% % 2013 < 85% 85% to 86% > 86% to < 88% 88% to < 91% 88% 91% 2014 < 85% 85% to < 86% 86% to < 88% 88% to < 91% 88% 91% 2015 < 84% 84% to < 86% 86% to < 88% 88% to < 91% 88% 91% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 25

Measure: C26 - Rating of Health Care Quality Rating of Health Care Quality 95 88 88 88 88 85 85 85 85 85 83 84 84 84 Percent of the best possible score the plan earned from members who rated the quality of the health care they received. CAHPS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 83% 83% to 84% * 85% to < 88% 85% 88% 2013 < 84% 84% to < 85% * 85% to < 88% 85% 88% 2014 < 84% 84% to < 85% * 85% to < 88% 85% 88% 2015 < 84% 84% to < 85% * 85% to < 88% 85% 88% * Due to rounding and the placement of the predetermined 4-star cutoff, no contracts were assigned 3 base stars; all contracts meeting the cutoff for 3 base stars also met the cutoff for 4 base stars. However after application of the further criteria of significance and reliability, some plans with fewer than 3 base stars may have been assigned 3 final stars. (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 26

Measure: C27 - Rating of Health Plan Rating of Health Plan 95 88 89 88 88 85 82 85 85 85 85 84 84 84 84 83 83 82 Percent of the best possible score the plan earned from members who rated the health plan. CAHPS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 82% 82% to < 84% 84% to < 85% 85% to < 88% 85% 88% 2013 < 83% 83% to < 84% 84% to < 85% 85% to < 89% 85% 89% 2014 < 83% 83% to < 84% 84% to < 85% 85% to < 88% 85% 88% 2015 < 82% 82% to < 84% 84% to < 85% 85% to < 88% 85% 88% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 27

Measure: C28 - Care Coordination Care Coordination 95 85 87 87 87 86 86 86 84 84 84 82 82 83 2013 2014 2015 Percent of the best possible score the plan earned on how well the plan coordinates members care. (This includes whether doctors had the records and information they need about members care and how quickly members got their test results.) CAHPS Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2013 < 82% 82% to < 84% 84% to < 86% 86% to < 87% Not Predetermined 87% 2014 < 82% 82% to < 84% 84% to < 86% 86% to < 87% Not predetermined 87% 2015 < 83% 83% to < 84% 84% to < 86% 86% to < 87% Not predetermined 87% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 28

Rate per 1,000 members Measure: C29 - Complaints about the Health Plan 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 Complaints about the Health Plan 1.8 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0.68 0.86 0.57 0.5 0.49 0.38 0.28 0.32 0.32 0.19 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.1 How many complaints Medicare received about the health plan. CTM Lower is better Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 > 0.68 > 0.49 to 0.68 > 0.28 to 0.49 > 0.17 to 0.28 Not predetermined 0.17 2013 > 0.57 > 0.38 to 0.57 > 0.19 to 0.38 > 0.12 to 0.19 Not predetermined 0.12 2014 > 0. > 0.32 to 0. > 0.16 to 0.32 > 0.10 to 0.16 Not predetermined 0.10 2015 > 1. > 0.86 to 1. > 0.32 to 0.86 > 0.17 to 0.32 Not predetermined 0.17 (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 29

Measure: C30 - Members Choosing to Leave the Plan 45 40 35 Members Choosing to Leave the Plan 46 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 29 19 20 17 15 14 14 16 11 10 11 7 7 8 9 The percent of plan members who chose to leave the plan in 2013. (This does not include members who did not choose to leave the plan, such as members who moved out of the service area.) Medicare Beneficiary Database Suite of Systems Lower is better Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 > 19% > 15% to 19% > 11% to 15% > 7% to 11% Not predetermined 7% 2013 > 17% > 14% to 17% > 10% to 14% > 7% to 10% Not predetermined 7% 2014 > 20% > 14% to 20% > 11% to 14% > 8% to 11% Not predetermined 8% 2015 > 46% > 29% to 46% > 16% to 29% > 9% to 16% Not predetermined 9% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 30

Measure: C32 - Plan Makes Timely Decisions about Appeals Plan Makes Timely Decisions about Appeals 91 94 95 92 85 85 85 85 71 71 73 66 57 52 40 44 47 30 Percent of plan members who got a timely response when they made an appeal request to the health plan about a decision to refuse payment or coverage. IRE Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 57% 57% to < 71% 71% to < 85% 85% to < 91% 85% 91% 2013 < 52% 52% to < 71% 71% to < 85% 85% to < 94% 85% 94% 2014 < 44% 44% to < 73% 73% to < 85% 85% to < 92% 85% 92% 2015 < 47% 47% to < 66% 66% to < 85% 85% to < 95% 85% 95% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 31

Measure: C33 - Reviewing Appeals Decisions Reviewing Appeals Decisions 92 91 95 95 87 87 87 87 63 66 69 67 77 40 30 This measure/rating shows how often an Independent Reviewer thought the health plan s decision to deny an appeal was fair. This includes appeals made by plan members and out-ofnetwork providers. (This rating is not based on how often the plan denies appeals, but rather how fair the plan is when they do deny an appeal.) IRE Cut Points: Year 1 Star Threshold 2012 < 63% 63% to < % % to < 87% 87% to < 92% 87% 92% 2013 < 66% 66% to < % % to < 87% 87% to < 91% 87% 91% 2014 < 69% 69% to < % % to < 87% 87% to < 95% 87% 95% 2015 < 67% 67% to < 77% 77% to < 87% 87% to < 95% 87% 95% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 32

Part D Measures Measure: D01 - Appeals Auto Forward Appeals Auto Forward: MAPD 40 36.7 35 30 27.6 25 20 15 10 5 0-5 5.3 8.3 3.4 3.4 1.3 1.3 2.2 1.3 1.8 1.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.7 Percent of plan members who got a timely response when they made an appeal request to the drug plan about a decision to refuse payment or coverage. IRE Lower is better Cut Points: Type Year 1 Star Threshold MAPD 2012 > 27.6 > 3.4 to 27.6 > 1.3 to 3.4 > 0.3 to 1.3 1.3 0.3 MAPD 2013 > 5.3 > 2.2 to 5.3 > 1.3 to 2.2 > 0.3 to 1.3 1.3 0.3 MAPD 2014 > 3.4 > 1.8 to 3.4 > 1.3 to 1.8 > 0.3 to 1.3 1.3 0.3 MAPD 2015 > 36.7 > 8.3 to 36.7 > 1.3 to 8.3 > 0.7 to 1.3 1.3 0.7 (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 33

40 35 Appeals Auto Forward: PDP 38.2 30 25 20 15 10 5 0-5 4.4 6.4 2.3 1 1.31 1.9 1 1 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.1 4.6 11.5 Percent of plan members who got a timely response when they made an appeal request to the drug plan about a decision to refuse payment or coverage. IRE Lower is better Cut Points: Type Year 1 Star Threshold PDP 2012 > 4.4 > 2.3 to 4.4 > 1.0 to 2.3 > 0.6 to 1.0 1.0 0.6 PDP 2013 > 6.4 > 1.3 to 6.4 > 1.0 to 1.3 > 0.3 to 1.0 1.0 0.3 PDP 2014 > 4.6 > 1.9 to 4.6 > 1.0 to 1.9 > 0.4 to 1.0 1.0 0.4 PDP 2015 > 38.2 > 11.5 to 38.2 > 1.0 to 11.5 > 0.1 to 1.0 1.0 0.1 (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 34

Measure: D02 - Appeals Upheld Appeals Upheld: MAPD 88 86 84 72 72 72 72 69 40 30 20 61.5 33.3 48 57 10 0 This measure/rating shows how often an Independent Reviewer thought the drug plan s decision to deny an appeal was fair. This includes appeals made by plan members and out-ofnetwork providers. (This rating is not based on how often the plan denies appeals, but rather how fair the plan is when they do deny an appeal.) IRE Cut Points: Type Year 1 Star Threshold MAPD 2012 < 33.3% 33.3% to < 61.5% 61.5% to < 72.0% 72.0% to <.0% 72%.0% MAPD 2013 < 48% 48% to < 57% 57% to < 72% 72% to < 88% 72% 88% MAPD 2014 < % % to < 69% 69% to < 72% 72% to < 86% 72% 86% MAPD 2015 < % % to < % % to < 72% 72% to < 84% 72% 84% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 35

Appeals Upheld: PDP 81.6 74 78 68 68 68 68 66.7 63 63 58 57 40 30 43.1 46 48 20 10 0 This measure/rating shows how often an Independent Reviewer thought the drug plan s decision to deny an appeal was fair. This includes appeals made by plan members and out-ofnetwork providers. (This rating is not based on how often the plan denies appeals, but rather how fair the plan is when they do deny an appeal.) IRE Cut Points: Type Year 1 Star Threshold PDP 2012 < 43.1% 43.1% to < 66.7% 66.7% to < 68.0% 68.0% to < 81.6% 68% 81.6% PDP 2013 < 46% 46% to < 63% 63% to < 68% 68% to < 74% 68% 74% PDP 2014 < 57% 57% to < 63% 63% to < 68% 68% to < % 68% % PDP 2015 < 48% 48% to < 58% 58% to < 68% 68% to < 78% 68% 78% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 36

Rate per 1,000 members Measure: D03 - Complaints about the Drug Plan 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 Complaints about the Drug Plan: MAPD 1.8 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0.68 0.86 0.57 0.5 0.49 0.38 0.28 0.32 0.32 0.19 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.1 How many complaints Medicare received about the drug plan. CTM Lower is better Cut Points: Type Year 1 Star Threshold MAPD 2012 > 0.68 > 0.49 to 0.68 > 0.28 to 0.49 > 0.17 to 0.28 Not predetermined 0.17 MAPD 2013 > 0.57 > 0.38 to 0.57 > 0.19 to 0.38 > 0.12 to 0.19 Not predetermined 0.12 MAPD 2014 > 0. > 0.32 to 0. > 0.16 to 0.32 > 0.10 to 0.16 Not predetermined 0.10 MAPD 2015 > 1. > 0.86 to 1. > 0.32 to 0.86 > 0.17 to 0.32 Not predetermined 0.17 (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 37

Rate per 1,000 members 1 Complaints about the Drug Plan: PDP 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0.47 0.26 0.17 0.13 0.14 0.44 0.43 0.3 0.22 0.15 0.12 0.08 0.08 0.55 0.36 0.17 How many complaints Medicare received about the drug plan. CTM Lower is better Cut Points: Type Year 1 Star Threshold PDP 2012 > 0.47 > 0.26 to 0.47 > 0.17 to 0.26 > 0.13 to 0.17 Not predetermined 0.13 PDP 2013 > 0.44 > 0.30 to 0.44 > 0.22 to 0.30 > 0.14 to 0.22 Not predetermined 0.14 PDP 2014 > 0.43 > 0.15 to 0.43 > 0.12 to 0.15 > 0.08 to 0.12 Not predetermined 0.08 PDP 2015 > 0.55 > 0.36 to 0.55 > 0.17 to 0.36 > 0.08 to 0.17 Not predetermined 0.08 (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 38

Measure: D04 - Members Choosing to Leave the Plan 45 40 35 Members Choosing to Leave the Plan: MAPD 46 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 29 19 20 17 15 14 14 16 11 10 11 7 7 8 9 The percent of plan members who chose to leave the plan in 2013. (This does not include members who did not choose to leave the plan, such as members who moved out of the service area.) Medicare Beneficiary Database Suite of Systems Lower is better Cut Points: Type Year 1 Star Threshold MAPD 2012 > 19% > 15% to 19% > 11% to 15% > 7% to 11% Not predetermined 7% MAPD 2013 > 17% > 14% to 17% > 10% to 14% > 7% to 10% Not predetermined 7% MAPD 2014 > 20% > 14% to 20% > 11% to 14% > 8% to 11% Not predetermined 8% MAPD 2015 > 46% > 29% to 46% > 16% to 29% > 9% to 16% Not predetermined 9% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 39

Members Choosing to Leave the Plan: PDP 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 19 19 20 16 14 14 15 11 10 11 9 8 8 8 5 4 The percent of plan members who chose to leave the plan in 2013. (This does not include members who did not choose to leave the plan, such as members who moved out of the service area.) Medicare Beneficiary Database Suite of Systems Lower is better Cut Points: Type Year 1 Star Threshold PDP 2012 > 19% > 14% to 19% > 11% to 14% > 9% to 11% Not predetermined 9% PDP 2013 > 19% > 14% to 19% > 10% to 14% > 8% to 10% Not predetermined 8% PDP 2014 > 16% > 11% to 16% > 8% to 11% > 5% to 8% Not predetermined 5% PDP 2015 > 20% > 15% to 20% > 8% to 15% > 4% to 8% Not predetermined 4% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 40

Measure: D06 - Rating of Drug Plan Rating of Drug Plan: MAPD 95 86 87 87 87 85 84 84 84 84 83 83 83 83 81 82 82 82 Percent of the best possible score the plan earned from members who rated the prescription drug plan. CAHPS Cut Points: Type Year 1 Star Threshold MAPD 2012 < 81% 81% to < 83% 83% to < 84% 84% to < 86% 84% 86% MAPD 2013 < 82% 82% to < 83% 83% to < 84% 84% to < 87% 84% 87% MAPD 2014 < 82% 82% to < 83% 83% to < 84% 84% to < 87% 84% 87% MAPD 2015 < 82% 82% to < 83% 83% to < 84% 84% to < 87% 84% 87% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 41

Rating of Drug Plan: PDP 95 85 83 86 86 86 81 81 81 81 79 77 Percent of the best possible score the plan earned from members who rated the prescription drug plan. CAHPS Cut Points: Type Year 1 Star Threshold PDP 2012 < 77% 77% to < 79% 79% to < 81% 81% to < 83% 81% 83% PDP 2013 < % % to < 81% * 81% to < 86% 81% 86% PDP 2014 < % % to < 81% * 81% to < 86% 81% 86% PDP 2015 < % % to < 81% * 81% to < 86% 81% 86% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 42

Measure: D07 - Getting Needed Prescription Drugs Getting Needed Prescription Drugs: MAPD 95 93 93 93 92 91 91 91 91 85 88 89 88 88 Percent of the best possible score the plan earned on how easy it is for members to get the prescription drugs they need using the plan. CAHPS Cut Points: Type Year 1 Star Threshold MAPD 2012 < 88% 88% to < % % to < 91% 91% to < 93% 91% 93% MAPD 2013 < 89% 89% to < % % to < 91% 91% to < 93% 91% 93% MAPD 2014 < 88% 88% to < % % to < 91% 91% to < 93% 91% 93% MAPD 2015 < 88% 88% to < % % to < 91% 91% to < 92% 91% 92% * Due to rounding and the placement of the predetermined 4-star cutoff, no contracts were assigned 3 base stars; all contracts meeting the cutoff for 3 base stars also met the cutoff for 4 base stars. However after application of the further criteria of significance and reliability, some plans with fewer than 3 base stars may have been assigned 3 final stars. (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 43

Getting Needed Prescription Drugs: PDP 95 91 92 91 91 85 87 89 89 89 89 88 88 88 Percent of the best possible score the plan earned on how easy it is for members to get the prescription drugs they need using the plan. CAHPS Cut Points: Type Year 1 Star Threshold PDP 2012 < 87% 87% to < 88% 88% to < 89% 89% to < 91% 89% 91% PDP 2013 < 88% 88% to < 89% * 89% to < 92% 89% 92% PDP 2014 < 89% * * 89% to < 91% 89% 91% PDP 2015 < 88% 88% to < 89% * 89% to < 91% 89% 91% * Due to rounding and the placement of the predetermined 4-star cutoff, no contracts were assigned 3 base stars; all contracts meeting the cutoff for 3 base stars also met the cutoff for 4 base stars. However after application of the further criteria of significance and reliability, some plans with fewer than 3 base stars may have been assigned 3 final stars. (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 44

Measure: D09 - High Risk Medication 30 High Risk Medication: MAPD 25 20 15 10 5 0 25.1 22.2 17 14 10.2 11 13 9.3 8.7 9 8 7 5 7 5 3 The percent of plan members who got prescriptions for certain drugs with a high risk of serious side effects, when there may be safer drug choices. Prescription Drug Event (PDE) data Lower is better Cut Points: Type Year 1 Star Threshold MAPD 2012 > 25.1% > 22.2% to 25.1% > 14.0% to 22.2% > 9.3% to 14.0% 14.0 9.3% MAPD 2013 > 10.2% > 8.7% to 10.2% > 7.0% to 8.7% > 5.0% to 7.0% Not predetermined 5.0% MAPD 2014 > 11% > 8% to 11% > 5% to 8% > 3% to 5% Not predetermined 3% MAPD 2015 > 17% > 13% to 17% > 9% to 13% > 7% to 9% Not predetermined 7% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 45

30 27.7 High Risk Medication: PDP 25 23.9 20 15 10 17.9 19.3 10.7 11 9.5 8.1 8 16 14 11 5 6.6 5 6 0 The percent of plan members who got prescriptions for certain drugs with a high risk of serious side effects, when there may be safer drug choices. Prescription Drug Event (PDE) data Lower is better 3 Cut Points: Type Year 1 Star Threshold PDP 2012 > 27.7% > 23.9% to 27.7% > 19.3% to 23.9% > 17.9% to 19.3% 19.3 17.9% PDP 2013 > 10.7% > 9.5% to 10.7% > 8.1% to 9.5% > 6.6% to 8.1% Not predetermined 6.6% PDP 2014 > 11% > 8% to 11% > 5% to 8% > 3% to 5% Not predetermined 3% PDP 2015 > 16% > 14% to 16% > 11% to 14% > 6% to 11% Not predetermined 6% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 46

Measure: D10 - Diabetes Treatment 95 Diabetes Treatment: MAPD 87.3 87.8 87 85 86 86 86 85 86 83.2 83.2 83 81.5 82 82 79 When people with diabetes also have high blood pressure, there are certain types of blood pressure medication recommended. This tells what percent got one of the recommended types of blood pressure medicine. Prescription Drug Event (PDE) data Cut Points: Type Year 1 Star Threshold MAPD 2012 < 81.5% 81.5% to < 83.2% 83.2% to < 86.0% 86.0% to < 87.3% 86% 87.3% MAPD 2013 < 82.0% 82.0% to < 83.2% 83.2% to < 86.0% 86.0% to < 87.8% 86% 87.8% MAPD 2014 < 82% 82% to < 85% 85% to < 86% 86% to < 87% 86% 87% MAPD 2015 < 79% 79% to < 83% 83% to < 86% 86% to < % 86% % (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 47

Diabetes Treatment: PDP 95 85 83.9 84.1 84 83 83 83 83 81.8 81.8 82 82.9.5 When people with diabetes also have high blood pressure, there are certain types of blood pressure medication recommended. This tells what percent got one of the recommended types of blood pressure medicine. Prescription Drug Event (PDE) data Cut Points: Type Year 1 Star Threshold PDP 2012 <.9%.9% to < 81.8% 81.8% to < 83.0% 83.0% to < 83.9% 83% 83.9% PDP 2013 <.5%.5% to < 81.8% 81.8% to < 83.0% 83.0% to < 84.1% 83% 84.1% PDP 2014 < % % to < 82% 82% to < 83% 83% to < 84% 83% 84% PDP 2015 < % % to < 82% 82% to < 83% 83% to < % 83% % (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 48

Measure: D11 - Medication Adherence for Diabetes Medications Medication Adherence for Diabetes Medications: MAPD 85 81 78.8 79 74.9.7.7 72 77 74 71 77 73 65 67.4 68.3 67 69 One of the most important ways you can manage your health is by taking your medication as directed. The plan, the doctor, and the member can work together to find ways to help the member take their medication as directed. Percent of plan members with a prescription for diabetes medication who fill their prescription often enough to cover % or more of the time they are supposed to be taking the medication. ( Diabetes medication means a biguanide drug, a sulfonylurea drug, a thiazolidinedione drug, a DPP-IV inhibitor, an incretin mimetic drug, or a meglitinide drug. Plan members who take insulin are not included.) Prescription Drug Event (PDE) data; Medicare Enrollment Database (EDB) File; Common Working File (CWF) Cut Points: Type Year 1 Star Threshold MAPD 2012 < 67.4% 67.4% to <.7%.7% to < 74.9% 74.9% to < 78.8% Not predetermined 78.8% MAPD 2013 < 68.3% 68.3% to < 72.0% 72.0% to <.7%.7% to < 79.0% Not predetermined 79.0% MAPD 2014 < 67% 67% to < 71% 71% to < 74% 74% to < 77% Not predetermined 77% MAPD 2015 < 69% 69% to < 73% 73% to < 77% 77% to < 81% Not predetermined 81% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 49

Medication Adherence for Diabetes Medications: PDP 85 82 79.2 79.6 79 77.3.8.5 76 73.6 72.3 73 85 74 82 79 69.4 65 One of the most important ways you can manage your health is by taking your medication as directed. The plan, the doctor, and the member can work together to find ways to help the member take their medication as directed. Percent of plan members with a prescription for diabetes medication who fill their prescription often enough to cover % or more of the time they are supposed to be taking the medication. ( Diabetes medication means a biguanide drug, a sulfonylurea drug, a thiazolidinedione drug, a DPP-IV inhibitor, an incretin mimetic drug, or a meglitinide drug. Plan members who take insulin are not included.) Prescription Drug Event (PDE) data; Medicare Enrollment Database (EDB) File; Common Working File (CWF) Cut Points: Type Year 1 Star Threshold PDP 2012 < 72.3% 72.3% to < 73.6% 73.6% to <.8%.8% to < 79.2% Not predetermined 79.2% PDP 2013 < 69.4% 69.4% to <.5%.5% to < 77.3% 77.3% to < 79.6% Not predetermined 79.6% PDP 2014 < 73% 73% to < 76% 76% to < 79% 79% to < 82% Not predetermined 82% PDP 2015 < 74% 74% to < 79% 79% to < 82% 82% to < 85% Not predetermined 85% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page

Measure: D12 - Medication Adherence for Hypertension (RAS antagonists) Medication Adherence for Hypertension (RAS antagonists): MAPD 85 85 77.9 74.8.1 79.7 76.5 72.6 79 72 72 81 76 65 66.3 67.8 68 One of the most important ways you can manage your health is by taking your medication as directed. The plan, the doctor, and the member can work together to find ways to help the member take their medication as directed. Percent of plan members with a prescription for a blood pressure medication who fill their prescription often enough to cover % or more of the time they are supposed to be taking the medication. ( Blood pressure medication means an ACE (angiotensin converting enzyme) inhibitor, an ARB (angiotensin receptor blocker), or a direct renin inhibitor drug.) Prescription Drug Event (PDE) data; Medicare Enrollment Database (EDB) File; Common Working File (CWF) Cut Points: Type Year 1 Star Threshold MAPD 2012 < 66.3% 66.3% to <.1%.1% to < 74.8% 74.8% to < 77.9% Not predetermined 77.9% MAPD 2013 < 67.8% 67.8% to < 72.6% 72.6% to < 76.5% 76.5% to < 79.7% Not predetermined 79.7% MAPD 2014 < 68% 68% to < 72% 72% to < % % to < 79% Not predetermined 79% MAPD 2015 < 72% 72% to < 76% 76% to < 81% 81% to < 85% Not predetermined 85% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 51

Medication Adherence for Hypertension (RAS antagonists): PDP 85 84.7 81 79.2 81 78.5 79 76.4 76.2 76 76 73.6 71.9 71.9 73 72 65 One of the most important ways you can manage your health is by taking your medication as directed. The plan, the doctor, and the member can work together to find ways to help the member take their medication as directed. Percent of plan members with a prescription for a blood pressure medication who fill their prescription often enough to cover % or more of the time they are supposed to be taking the medication. ( Blood pressure medication means an ACE (angiotensin converting enzyme) inhibitor, an ARB (angiotensin receptor blocker), or a direct renin inhibitor drug.) Prescription Drug Event (PDE) data; Medicare Enrollment Database (EDB) File; Common Working File (CWF) Cut Points: Type Year 1 Star Threshold PDP 2012 < 71.9% 71.9% to < 73.6% 73.6% to < 76.4% 76.4% to < 79.2% Not predetermined 79.2% PDP 2013 < 71.9% 71.9% to < 76.2% 76.2% to < 78.5% 78.5% to <.7% Not predetermined.7% PDP 2014 < 73% 73% to < 76% 76% to < 79% 79% to < 81% Not predetermined 81% PDP 2015 < 72% 72% to < 76% 76% to < 81% 81% to < 84% Not predetermined 84% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 52

Measure: D13 - Medication Adherence for Cholesterol (Statins) Medication Adherence for Cholesterol (Statins): MAPD 85 83 65.2.4 76.8 71.6 71 67.4 67.3 68 68 55 61.6 63 63 59 One of the most important ways you can manage your health is by taking your medication as directed. The plan, the doctor, and the member can work together to find ways to help the member take their medication as directed. Percent of plan members with a prescription for a cholesterol medication (a statin drug) who fill their prescription often enough to cover % or more of the time they are supposed to be taking the medication. Prescription Drug Event (PDE) data; Medicare Enrollment Database (EDB) File; Common Working File (CWF) Cut Points: Type Year 1 Star Threshold MAPD 2012 < 61.6% 61.6% to < 67.4% 67.4% to <.8%.8% to <.2% Not predetermined.2% MAPD 2013 < 63.0% 63.0% to < 67.3% 67.3% to < 71.6% 71.6% to <.4% Not predetermined.4% MAPD 2014 < 63% 63% to < 68% 68% to < 71% 71% to < % Not predetermined % MAPD 2015 < 59% 59% to < 68% 68% to < 76% 76% to < 83% Not predetermined 83% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 53

Medication Adherence for Cholesterol (Statins): PDP 85.8 76.6 76 78 65 72.3 67.8 74.3 74 71.4 72 69.2 69 55 59.9 62 One of the most important ways you can manage your health is by taking your medication as directed. The plan, the doctor, and the member can work together to find ways to help the member take their medication as directed. Percent of plan members with a prescription for a cholesterol medication (a statin drug) who fill their prescription often enough to cover % or more of the time they are supposed to be taking the medication. Prescription Drug Event (PDE) data; Medicare Enrollment Database (EDB) File; Common Working File (CWF) Cut Points: Type Year 1 Star Threshold PDP 2012 < 59.9% 59.9% to < 67.8% 67.8% to < 72.3% 72.3% to <.8% Not predetermined.8% PDP 2013 < 69.2% 69.2% to < 71.4% 71.4% to < 74.3% 74.3% to < 76.6% Not predetermined 76.6% PDP 2014 < % % to < 72% 72% to < 74% 74% to < 76% Not predetermined 76% PDP 2015 < 62% 62% to < 69% 69% to < % % to < 78% Not predetermined 78% (Last Updated 11/18/2014) Page 54