8/14/2012 California Dual Demonstration DRAFT Quality Metrics
|
|
|
- Nathaniel Douglas
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Stakeholder feedback is requested on the following: 1) metrics 69 through 94; and 2) withhold measures for years 1, 2, and 3. Steward/ 1 Antidepressant medication management Percentage of members 18 years of age and older who were diagnosed with a new episode of major depression and treated with antidepressant medication, and who remained on an antidepressant medication treatment. 2 Initiation and engagement of Alcohol and Other Drug Dependence Treatment The percentage of adolescent and adult members with a new episode of alcohol or other drug (AOD) dependence who received the following. Initiation of AOD Treatment. The percentage of members who initiate treatment through an inpatient AOD admission, outpatient visit, intensive outpatient encounter or partial hospitalization within 14 days of the diagnosis. Engagement of AOD Treatment. The percentage of members who initiated treatment and who had two or more additional services with a diagnosis of AOD within 30 days of the initiation visit. 3 Follow-up After Hospitalization for Mental Illness Percentage of discharges for members 6 years of age and older who were hospitalized for treatment of selected mental health disorders and who had an outpatient visit, an intensive outpatient encounter or Y2, Y3 partial hospitalization with a mental health practitioner. 4 Screening for Clinical Depression and Follow-up Percentage of patients ages 18 years and older screened for clinical depression using a standardized tool and follow-up plan documented. The organization coordinates services for members with complex conditions and helps them access needed resources. Element A: Identifying Members for Case Management Element B: Access to Case Management Element C: Case Management Systems Element D: Frequency of Member Identification 5 SNP1: Complex Case Management Element E: Providing Members with Element F: Case Management Assessment NCQA/ HEDIS Process Element G: Individualized Plan Element H: Informing and Educating Practitioners Element I: Satisfaction with Case Management Element J: Analyzing Effectiveness/Identifying Opportunities Element K: Implementing Interventions and Followup Evaluation CMS Y2, Y3 Page 1 of 9
2 Steward/ 6 The organization coordinates Medicare and Medicaid benefits and services for members. Element A: Coordination of Benefits for Dual Eligible Members Element B: Administrative Coordination of D-SNPs SNP 6: Coordination of Medicare and Element C: Administrative Coordination for Chronic Medicaid Benefits Condition and Institutional Benefit Packages (May not be applicable for demos) NCQA/ HEDIS Element D: Service Coordination Element E: Network Adequacy Assessment 7 Transition Record Transmitted to Health Professional Percentage of patients, regardless of age, discharged from an inpatient facility to home or any other site of care for whom a transition record was transmitted to the facility or primary physician or other health care professional designated for followup care within 24 hours of discharge. AMA-PCPI 8 Reconciliation After Discharge from Inpatient Facility Percent of patients 65 years or older discharged from any inpatient facility and seen within 60 days following discharge by the physician providing ongoing care who had a reconciliation of the discharge medications with the current medication list in the medical record documented 9 SNP 4: Transitions The organization manages the process of care transitions, identifies problems that could cause transitions and where possible prevents unplanned transitions. Element A: Managing Transitions Element B: Supporting Members through Transitions Element C: Analyzing Performance CAHPS, various settings including: Element D: Identifying Unplanned Transitions Element E; Analyzing Transitions Element F: Reducing Transitions -Health Plan plus supplemental items/questions, including: 10 - of and Health Outcomes for Behavioral Health (ECHO) -Home Health Depends on Survey -Nursing Home -People with Mobility Impariments -Cultural Competence -Patient Centered Medical Home Page 2 of 9
3 Steward/ 11 Call Center Pharmacy Hold Time How long pharmacists wait on hold when they call the drug plan s pharmacy help desk. CMS & Call Center data 12 Call Center Foreign Language Interpreter and TTY/TDD Availability Percent of the time that TTY/TDD services and foreign language interpretation were available when CMS & Call Center needed by members who called the drug plan s data customer service phone number. 13 Appeals Auto Forward 14 Appeals Upheld 15 Enrollment Timeliness 16 Complaints about the Drug Plan How often the drug plan did not meet Medicare s deadlines for timely appeals decisions. This measure is defined as the rate of cases autoforwarded to the Independent Review Entity (IRE) because decision timeframes for coverage determinations or redeterminations were exceeded by the plan. This is calculated as: [(Total number of cases auto-forwarded to the IRE) / (Average Medicare enrollment)] * 10,000. IRE How often an independent reviewer agrees with the drug plan's decision to deny or say no to a member s appeal. This measure is defined as the IRE percent of IRE confirmations of upholding the plans decisions. This is calculated as: [(Number of cases upheld) / (Total number of cases reviewed)] * 100. The percentage of enrollment requests that the plan transmits to the Medicare program within 7 days. How many complaints Medicare received about the drug plan. For each contract, this rate is calculated as: [(Total number of complaints logged into the CTM for the drug plan regarding any issues) / (Average Contract enrollment)] * 1,000 * 30 / (Number of Days in Period). Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug System (MARx) CMS & CTM data 17 Beneficiary Access and Performance Problems To check on whether members are having problems getting access to care and to be sure that plans are following all of Medicare s rules, Medicare conducts audits and other types of reviews. Medicare gives the plan a lower score (from 0 to CMS & 100) when it finds problems. The score combines Administrative data how severe the problems were, how many there were, and how much they affect plan members directly. A higher score is better, as it means Medicare found fewer problems. 18 Members Choosing to Leave the Plan The percent of drug plan members who chose to leave the plan in CMS & Medicare Beneficiary Database Suite of Systems Page 3 of 9
4 Steward/ 19 MPF Accuracy 20 High Risk The accuracy of how the Plan Finder data match the PDS data The percent of the drug plan members who get prescriptions for certain drugs with a high risk of serious side effects, when there may be safer drug choices. CMS, PDE data, MPF Pricing Files, HPMS approved formulary extracts, and data from First DataBank and Medispan CMS & PDE data 21 Diabetes Treatment Percentage of Medicare beneficiaries who were dispensed a medication for diabetes and a medication for hypertension who were receiving an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) medication which are recommended for people with diabetes. CMS & PDE data 22 Adherence for Oral Diabetes s Percent of plan members with a prescription for oral diabetes medication who fill their prescription often enough to cover 80% or more of the time they are supposed to be taking the medication. CMS & PDE data Y2, Y3 23 Adherence for Hypertension (ACEI or ARB) Percent of plan members with a prescription for a blood pressure medication who fill their prescription CMS & PDE data often enough to cover 80% or more of the time they are supposed to be taking the medication 24 Adherence for Cholesterol (Statins) Percent of plan members with a prescription for a cholesterol medication (a statin drug) who fill their prescription often enough to cover 80% or more of the time they are supposed to be taking the medication. CMS & PDE data 25 Plan Makes Timely Decisions about Appeals 26 Reviewing Appeals Decisions Percent of plan members who got a timely response when they made a written appeal to the health plan about a decision to refuse payment or coverage. How often an independent reviewer agrees with the plan's decision to deny or say no to a member s appeal. IRE IRE 27 Call Center Foreign Language Interpreter and TTY/TDD Availability Percent of the time that the TTY/TDD services and foreign language interpretation were available when CMS & Call Center needed by members who called the health plan s data customer service phone number. Page 4 of 9
5 Steward/ 28 Percent of High Risk Residents with Pressure Ulcers (Long Stay) Percentage of all long-stay residents in a nursing facility with an annual, quarterly, significant change or significant correction MDS assessment during the selected quarter (3-month period) who were identified as high risk and who have one or more Stage 2-4 pressure ulcer(s). NQF endorsed 29 Risk assessments Percent of members with initial assessments completed within 90 days of enrollment Y1? 30 Individualized care plans Percent of members with care plans by specified timeframe Real time hospital admission notifications Risk stratification based on LTSS or other factors 33 Discharge follow-up Percent of hospital admission notifications occurring within specified timeframe Percent of risk stratifications using BH/LTSS data/indicators Percent of members with specified timeframe between discharge to first follow-up visit 34 Self-direction Percent of care coordinators that have undergone State-based training for supporting self-direction under the Demonstration 35 for Older Adults Review Percent of plan members whose doctor or clinical pharmacist has reviewed a list of everything they take (prescription and non-prescription drugs, vitamins, herbal remedies, other supplements) at least once a year. NCQA/ HEDIS 36 for Older Adults Functional Status Assessment Percent of plan members whose doctor has done a functional status assessment to see how well they are doing activities of daily living (such as dressing, eating, and bathing). 37 for Older Adults Pain Screening 38 Diabetes Eye Exam Diabetes - Kidney Monitoring Diabetes Blood Sugar Controlled 41 Rheumatoid Arthritis Management 42 Reducing the Risk of Falling Percent of plan members who had a pain screening or pain management plan at least once during the year. Percent of plan members with diabetes who had an eye exam to check for damage from diabetes during the year. Percent of plan members with diabetes who had a kidney function test during the year Percent of plan members with diabetes who had an A-1-C lab test during the year that showed their average blood sugar is under control. Percent of plan members with Rheumatoid Arthritis who got one or more prescription(s) for an antirheumatic drug. Percent of members with a problem falling, walking or balancing who discussed it with their doctor and got treatment for it during the year.? & HOS? Y2, Y3 Page 5 of 9
6 43 Plan All-Cause Readmissions 44 Controlling Blood Pressure 45 Comprehensive medication review 46 Complaints about the Health Plan Steward/ Percent of members discharged from a hospital stay who were readmitted to a hospital within 30 days, either from the same condition as their recent Y2, Y3 hospital stay or for a different reason. Percentage of members years of age who had a diagnosis of hypertension and whose blood pressure was adequately controlled (<140/90) Y2, Y3 during the measurement year. Percentage of beneficiaries who received a Pharmacy comprehensive medication review (CMR) out of Alliance (PQA) those who were offered a CMR.? How many complaints Medicare received about the health plan. Rate of complaints about the health plan per 1,000 members. For each contract, this rate is calculated as: [(Total number of all complaints logged into the CTM) / (Average Contract enrollment)] * 1,000 * 30 / (Number of Days in Period). CMS & CTM data 47 Beneficiary Access and Performance Problems To check on whether members are having problems getting access to care and to be sure that plans are following all of Medicare s rules, Medicare conducts audits and other types of reviews. Medicare gives the plan a lower score (from 0 to CMS & Beneficiary 100) when it finds problems. The score combines database how severe the problems were, how many there were, and how much they affect plan members directly. A higher score is better, as it means Medicare found fewer problems?? 48 Members Choosing to Leave the The percent of plan members who chose to leave Plan the plan in CMS The percent of the best possible score that the plan earned on how easy it is for members to get information from their drug plan about prescription drug coverage and cost. -In the last 6 months, how often did your health plan s customer service give you the information or help you needed about prescription drugs? -In the last 6 months, how often did your plan s 49 Getting From Drug Plan customer service staff treat you with courtesy and respect when you tried to get information or help about prescription drugs? -In the last 6 months, how often did your health plan give you all the information you needed about prescription medication were covered? -In the last 6 months, how often did your health plan give you all the information you needed about how much you would have to pay for your prescription medicine? The percent of the best possible score that the drug plan earned from members who rated the drug plan for its coverage of prescription drugs. Page 6 of 9
7 Steward/ Rating of Drug Plan Getting Needed Prescription Drugs Getting Needed -Using any number from 0 to 10, where 0 is the worst prescription drug plan possible and 10 is the best prescription drug plan possible, what number would you use to rate your health plan for coverage of prescription drugs? The percent of best possible score that the plan earned on how easy it is for members to get the prescription drugs they need using the plan. -In the last 6 months, how often was it easy to use your health plan to get the medicines your doctor prescribed? -In the last six months, how often was it easy to use your health plan to fill a prescription at a local pharmacy? Percent of best possible score the plan earned on how easy it is to get needed care, including care from specialists. In the last 6 months, how often was it easy to get appointments with specialists? In the last 6 months, how often was it easy to get the care, tests, or treatment you needed through your health plan? Percent of best possible score the plan earned on how quickly members get appointments and care. 53 Getting Appointments and Quickly In the last 6 months, when you needed care right away, how often did you get care as soon as you thought you needed? In the last 6 months, not counting the times when you needed care right away, 54 How often did you get an appointment for your health care at a doctor's office or clinic as soon as you thought you needed? Percent of best possible score the plan earned from plan members who rated the overall health care received. Overall Rating of Health Using any number from 0 to 10, where 0 is the worst health care possible and 10 is the best health care possible, what number would you use to rate all your health care in the last 6 months? Percent of best possible score the plan earned from plan members who rated the overall plan. 55 Overall Rating of Plan Using any number from 0 to 10, where 0 is the worst health plan possible and 10 is the best health plan possible, what number would you use to rate your health plan? 56 Breast Cancer Screening 57 Colorectal Cancer Screening Cardiovascular Cholesterol Screening Diabetes Cholesterol Screening Percent of female plan members aged who had a mammogram during the past 2 years. NCQA/ HEDIS Percent of plan members aged who had appropriate screening for colon cancer. Percent of plan members with heart disease who have had a test for bad (LDL) cholesterol within the past year. Percent of plan members with diabetes who have had a test for bad (LDL) cholesterol within the past year. Page 7 of 9
8 60 Annual Flu Vaccine 61 Improving or Maintaining Mental Health 62 Monitoring Physical Activity 63 Access to Primary Doctor Visits 64 Access to Specialists Steward/ Percent of plan members who got a vaccine (flu & shot) prior to flu season. Survey data Y2, Y3 Percent of all plan members whose mental health was the same or better than expected after two CMS & HOS years. Percent of senior plan members who discussed exercise with their doctor and were advised to start, HEDIS / HOS increase or maintain their physical activity during the year. Percent of all plan members who saw their primary HEDIS care doctor during the year.? Proportion of respondents who report that it is always easy to get appointment with specialists 65 Getting Quickly Composite of access to urgent care 66 Being Examined on the Examination Percentage of respondents who report always table being examined on the examination table 67 Help with Transportation Composite of getting needed help with transportation?? 68 Health Status/Function Status Percent of members who report their health as excellent Development of Coordination Plans on a timely 69 basis for beneficiaries identified at highest risk through Health Risk Assessment (TBD) 70 Transition Record Transmitted to Health (AMA-PCPI)? Professional 71 Percentage of patients, regardless of age, discharged from an inpatient facility to home or any Transition Record with other sites of care, or their caregivers(s), who Specified elements Received AMA-PCI received a transition record at the time of discharge by Discharged Patients including, at a minimum, all of the specified elements. 72 Percent of new members completing a health risk? assessment Behavioral Health Shared 73 Accountability Process Y1. (year 1) 74 Behavioral Health Shared Accountability Enhanced Process for Evidence of Data Sharing and Joint Planning (Year 2) and Reduction in Emergency? Y2, Y3 Department Use for Seriously Mentally Ill (SMI) and Substance Use Disorder (SUD) Enrollees (Year 3) 75 Complaints and appeals 76 Disenrollment Rate for Cause New state-specific measure Y1? 77 Physician Access Review encounter data pre and post enrollment for changes in physician visits Page 8 of 9
9 Steward/ 78 Psychiatric bed days 79 ER utilization rates day readmission rate 81 Increasing medication adherence? 82 Nursing facility utilization measures 83 LTSS consumer control and participation in decisionmaking, caregiver participation, social support. National Core Indicators Project (needs review)? Proportion of those deemed at risk for LTSS who 84 received a comprehensive assessment that included physical and cognitive function assessment Degree to which consumers 85 experience an increased level of functioning; 86 Unmet need in ADLs/IADLs; Unmet need in ADLs/IADLs, and community involvement. 87 Degree to which health status is maintained and improved; 88 Case manager contact with Ability to identify case manager or contact member case manager 89 LTSS consumer satisfaction Satisfaction with case manager, home measures workers, personal care. 90 Improved Behavioral health focused HEDIS measures Encounter data submitted accurately and 91 Encounter Data completely in compliance with contract requirements 92 Consumer Governance Board 93 Customer Service (for CY 2014) 94 Access to (for CY 2014) Modified CAHPS? CMS/State defined process measure?? Establishment of consumer advistory CMS/State board or inclusion of consumers on defined process governance board consistent with contract measure requirements Y1 Percent of best possible score the plan earned on how easy it is to get information Y1? and help when needed. Percent of respondents who always or usually were able to access care quickly Y1? when they needed it. Y1 Page 9 of 9
Trends in Part C & D Star Rating Measure Cut Points
Trends in Part C & D Star Rating Measure Cut Points Updated 11/18/2014 Document Change Log Previous Version Description of Change Revision Date - Initial release of the 2015 Trends in Part C & D Star Rating
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) strives to make information available to all. Nevertheless, portions of our files including
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) strives to make information available to all. Nevertheless, portions of our files including charts, tables, and graphics may be difficult to read using
Medicare Part C & D Star Ratings: Update for 2016. August 5, 2015 Part C & D User Group Call
Medicare Part C & D Star Ratings: Update for 2016 August 5, 2015 Part C & D User Group Call Session Overview 2016 Star Ratings Changes announced in Call Letter. HPMS Plan Previews. 2016 Display Measures.
An Update on Medicare Parts C & D Performance Measures
An Update on Medicare Parts C & D Performance Measures CMS Spring Conference April 12 & 13, 2011 Liz Goldstein, Ph.D. Director, Division of Consumer Assessment & Plan Performance Vikki Oates, M.A.S Director,
Fact Sheet - 2016 Star Ratings
Fact Sheet - 2016 Star Ratings One of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) most important strategic goals is to improve the quality of care and general health status for Medicare beneficiaries.
Star Quality Ratings: Legal, Operational and Strategic Questions for MA Organizations and Part D Plan Sponsors
Where Do We Go From Here? Star Quality Ratings: Legal, Operational and Strategic Questions for MA Organizations and Part D Plan Sponsors American Health Lawyers Association 2011 Payors, Plans and Managed
Medicare Health & Drug Plan Quality and Performance Ratings 2013 Part C & Part D Technical Notes. First Plan Preview DRAFT
Medicare Health & Drug Plan Quality and Performance Ratings 2013 Part C & Part D Technical Notes First Plan Preview Updated 08/09/2012 Document Change Log Previous Version Description of Change Revision
Key Points about Star Ratings from the CMS 2016 Final Call Letter
News from April 2015 Key Points about Star Ratings from the CMS 2016 Final Call Letter On April 6, 2015 CMS released the Announcement of Methodological Changes for Calendar Year 2016 for Medicare Advantage
HEDIS, STAR Performance Metrics. Sheila Linehan, RN,MPH, CPHQ Director of QM, Horizon BCBSNJ July 16, 2014
HEDIS, STAR Performance Metrics Sheila Linehan, RN,MPH, CPHQ Director of QM, Horizon BCBSNJ July 16, 2014 Goals Discuss what HEDIS and Star Metrics are Discuss their impact on Health Plans Discuss their
Report on comparing quality among Medicare Advantage plans and between Medicare Advantage and fee-for-service Medicare
O N L I N E A P P E N D I X E S 6 Report on comparing quality among Medicare Advantage plans and between Medicare Advantage and fee-for-service Medicare 6-A O N L I N E A P P E N D I X Current quality
Quality Measures Overview
Quality Measures Overview Health care quality, Stars and Member Engagement Initiatives Approved for External Use Section 1 Introduction Introduction Stars Quality Measures Overview UnitedHealthcare is
Medicare 2015 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes DRAFT
Medicare 2015 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes Updated 09/03/2014 Document Change Log Previous Version Description of Change Revision Date - Initial release of the preliminary 2015 Part C & D Star
Performance Measurement for the Medicare and Medicaid Eligible (MME) Population in Connecticut Survey Analysis
Performance Measurement for the Medicare and Medicaid Eligible (MME) Population in Connecticut Survey Analysis Methodology: 8 respondents The measures are incorporated into one of four sections: Highly
2013 ACO Quality Measures
ACO 1-7 Patient Satisfaction Survey Consumer Assessment of HealthCare Providers Survey (CAHPS) 1. Getting Timely Care, Appointments, Information 2. How well Your Providers Communicate 3. Patient Rating
See page 331 of HEDIS 2013 Tech Specs Vol 2. HEDIS specs apply to plans. RARE applies to hospitals. Plan All-Cause Readmissions (PCR) *++
Hospitalizations Inpatient Utilization General Hospital/Acute Care (IPU) * This measure summarizes utilization of acute inpatient care and services in the following categories: Total inpatient. Medicine.
The Star Treatment: Estimating the Impact of Star Ratings on Medicare. Advantage Enrollments. Appendices
The Star Treatment: Estimating the Impact of Star Ratings on Medicare Advantage Enrollments. Appendices Michael Darden Department of Economics Tulane University Ian M. McCarthy Department of Economics
Fact Sheet - 2014 Star Ratings
Fact Sheet - 2014 Star Ratings Star Ratings are driving improvements in Medicare quality. This year there have been significant increases in the number of Medicare beneficiaries in high-performing Medicare
HEDIS/CAHPS 101. August 13, 2012 Minnesota Measurement and Reporting Workgroup
HEDIS/CAHPS 101 Minnesota Measurement and Reporting Workgroup Objectives Provide introduction to NCQA Identify HEDIS/CAHPS basics Discuss various components related to HEDIS/CAHPS usage, including State
2015 PROVIDER TOOLKIT Understanding the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Stars Rating System
Understanding the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Stars Rating System 7990 IH 10 West, Suite 300 San Antonio, TX 78230 What is CMS Quality Star Ratings program? CMS evaluates health insurance plans
Coventry Health Care of Florida, Inc. Coventry Health Plan of Florida, Inc. Summit Health Plan of Florida
Coventry Health Care of Florida, Inc. Coventry Health Plan of Florida, Inc. Summit Health Plan of Florida Medicare Quality Management Program Overview Quality Improvement (QI) Overview At Coventry, we
Medicare 2016 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes. First Plan Preview DRAFT
Medicare 2016 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes First Plan Preview Updated 08/05/2015 Document Change Log Previous Version Description of Change Revision Date - Initial release of the 2016 Part C
Medicare Advantage Stars: Are the Grades Fair?
Douglas Holtz-Eakin Conor Ryan July 16, 2015 Medicare Advantage Stars: Are the Grades Fair? Executive Summary Medicare Advantage (MA) offers seniors a one-stop option for hospital care, outpatient physician
Coventry Health Care of Florida, Inc. Coventry Health Plan of Florida, Inc. Coventry Health and Life Insurance Company Commercial Lines of Business
Coventry Health Care of Florida, Inc. Coventry Health Plan of Florida, Inc. Coventry Health and Life Insurance Company Commercial Lines of Business Quality Management Program 2012 Overview Quality Improvement
Medicare 2016 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes
Medicare 2016 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes Updated 09/30/2015 Document Change Log Previous Version of Change Revision Date - Release of the final 2016 Part C & D Star Ratings Technical Notes
All Medicare Advantage Organizations, Prescription Drug Plan Sponsors, and Other Interested Parties
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850 CENTER FOR MEDICARE DATE: November 21, 2014 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: All
Department of Health Services. Behavioral Health Integrated Care. Health Home Certification Application
Department of Health Services Behavioral Health Integrated Care Health Home Certification Application (Langlade, Lincoln, and Marathon Counties) December 18, 2013 1 Behavioral Health Integrated Care Health
Medicare 2014 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes
Medicare 2014 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes Updated 09/27/2013 Document Change Log Previous Version Description of Change Revision Date - Initial release of the Final 2014 Part C & D Star Ratings
Improving Quality of Care for Medicare Patients: Accountable Care Organizations
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Improving Quality of Medicare Patients: Overview The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (), an agency within the Department
Medicare. Orientation Guide
Medicare Orientation Guide Your Medicare Orientation Guide At MCS Classicare (HMO), we take care of you so you feel better every day. That s why we want to get you familiar and provide you with the tools
Ohio Health Homes Learning Community Meeting. Overview of Health Homes Measures
Ohio Health Homes Learning Community Meeting Overview of Health Homes Measures Tuesday, March 5, 2013 Presenter: Amber Saldivar, MHSM Associate Director, Informatics Analysis Health Services Advisory Group,
Medicaid Managed Care EQRO and MLTSS Quality. April 3, 2014 IPRO State of Nebraska EQRO
Medicaid Managed Care EQRO and MLTSS Quality April 3, 2014 IPRO State of Nebraska EQRO IPRO provides a full spectrum of healthcare assessment and improvement services that foster the efficient use of resources
HealthCare Partners of Nevada. Heart Failure
HealthCare Partners of Nevada Heart Failure Disease Management Program 2010 HF DISEASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM The HealthCare Partners of Nevada (HCPNV) offers a Disease Management program for members with
Improving Quality of Care for Medicare Patients: Accountable Care Organizations
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Improving Quality of Care for Medicare Patients: FACT SHEET Overview http://www.cms.gov/sharedsavingsprogram On October
7/31/2014. Medicare Advantage: Time to Re-examine Your Engagement Strategy. Avalere Health. Eric Hammelman, CFA. Overview
Medicare Advantage: Time to Re-examine Your Engagement Strategy July 2014 avalerehealth.net Avalere Health Avalere Health delivers research, analysis, insight & strategy to leaders in healthcare policy
Welcome to Magellan Complete Care
Magellan Complete Care of Florida Provider Newsletter Welcome to Magellan Complete Care On behalf of Magellan Complete Care of Florida, thank you for your continued support and collaboration. As the only
A COMPARISON OF MEDI-CAL MANAGED CARE P4P MEASURE SETS
A COMPARISON OF MEDI-CAL MANAGED CARE P4P MEASURE SETS The matrix below provides a comparison of all measures included in Medi-Cal P4P programs and the measures includes in DHCS s External Accountability
STARs Tutorial Medicare Advantage Plan Star Ratings and Bonus Payments in 2012 A Tutorial for Utilizing SETMA s Deployment of the STARS MA Program
STARs Tutorial Medicare Advantage Plan Star Ratings and Bonus Payments in 2012 A Tutorial for Utilizing SETMA s Deployment of the STARS MA Program Increasingly, health plans and particularly Federal programs
Shoot For The Stars. Medicare Advantage Plans. Quality Scores Drive Participation 1
Shoot For The Stars Medicare Advantage Plans Quality Scores Drive Participation 1 Stars Rating System CMS rates Medicare Advantage Plans (HMO, PPO, and PFFS) on a 1 to 5 Star scale. Star ratings can be
H7833_150304MO01. Information for Care Providers about UnitedHealthcare Connected (Medicare- Medicaid Plan) in Harris County, Texas
H7833_150304MO01 Information for Care Providers about UnitedHealthcare Connected (Medicare- Medicaid Plan) in Harris County, Texas Agenda Connecting Medicare and Medicaid Eligible Members Service Coordination
11/2/2015 Domain: Care Coordination / Patient Safety
11/2/2015 Domain: Care Coordination / Patient Safety 2014 CT Commercial Medicaid Compared to 2012 all LOB Medicaid Quality Compass Benchmarks 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Documentation of Current Medications in
Health Care Reform Update January 2012 MG76120 0212 LILLY USA, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Health Care Reform Update January 2012 Disclaimer This presentation is for educational purposes only. It is not a complete analysis of the material contained herein. Before taking any action on the issues
A Detailed Data Set From the Year 2011
2012 HEDIS 2012 A Detailed Data Set From the Year 2011 Commercial Product We are pleased to present the AvMed HEDIS 2012 Report, a detailed data set designed to give employers and consumers an objective
MEASURING CARE QUALITY
MEASURING CARE QUALITY Region November 2015 For Clinical Effectiveness of Care Measures of Performance From: Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS ) HEDIS is a set of standardized performance
Numerator Details. - An acute or nonacute inpatient admission with a diagnosis of AOD (AOD Dependence
Description Measure 0004: Initiation and Engagement of Alcohol and Other Drug Dependence Treatment (IET) (National Committee for Quality Assurance) The percentage of adolescent and adult patients with
Chapter Three Accountable Care Organizations
Chapter Three Accountable Care Organizations One of the most talked-about changes in health care delivery in recent decades is Accountable Care Organizations, or ACOs. Having gained the attention of both
SUMMARY TABLE OF MEASURES, PRODUCT LINES AND CHANGES
Summary Table of Measures, Product Lines and Changes 1 SUMMARY TABLE OF MEASURES, PRODUCT LINES AND CHANGES General Guidelines for Data Collection and Reporting Guidelines for Calculations and Sampling
Medical Management. G.2 At a Glance. G.3 Procedures Requiring Prior Authorization. G.5 How to Contact or Notify Medical Management
Page1 G.2 At a Glance G.3 Procedures Requiring Prior Authorization G.5 How to Contact or Notify G.6 When to Notify G.11 Case Management Services G.14 Special Needs Services G.16 Health Management Programs
Washington Common Measure Set on Healthcare Quality. Behavioral Health Measure Selection Workgroup Meeting #2 September 14, 2015
Washington Common Measure Set on Healthcare Quality Behavioral Health Measure Selection Workgroup Meeting #2 September 14, 2015 Today s Meeting Agenda 1. Welcome, Member Introductions 2. Review: Public
Quality Measures for Pharmacies
PL Detail-Document #320101 This PL Detail-Document gives subscribers additional insight related to the Recommendations published in PHARMACIST S LETTER / PRESCRIBER S LETTER January 2016 Quality for Pharmacies
YOUR FAST TRACK TO LIVING WELL. A Step Ahead Get answers to your diabetes questions. Member Rights The care and service you need. www.aultcare.
good health SPRING 2014 YOUR FAST TRACK TO LIVING WELL A Step Ahead Get answers to your diabetes questions Member Rights The care and service you need www.aultcare.com IN BRIEF Do You Have Questions? Find
Behavioral Health Quality Standards for Providers
Behavioral Health Quality Standards for Providers TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Behavioral Health Quality Standards Access Standards A. Access Standards B. After-Hours C. Continuity and Coordination of Care 1.
Explanation of CMS Proposed Performance Measurement Framework for ACOs and Comparison with IHA P4P Measure Set April 2011
Explanation of CMS Proposed Performance ment Framework for ACOs and Comparison with IHA P4P Set April 2011 This briefing outlines Section II E ( and Other Reporting Requirements) of the Shared Savings
Stay Healthy. In the Know. Screenings you and your family need. Protect yourself against health care fraud. www.aultcare.com
good health FALL 2015 YOUR FAST TRACK TO LIVING WELL Stay Healthy Screenings you and your family need In the Know Protect yourself against health care fraud www.aultcare.com TELL US HOW WE ARE DOING Whether
Texas Medicaid Managed Care and Children s Health Insurance Program
Texas Medicaid Managed Care and Children s Health Insurance Program External Quality Review Organization Summary of Activities and Trends in Healthcare Quality Contract Year 2013 Measurement Period: September
HCCs and Star-Ratings: An IPA s Successful Approach to Revenue Integrity. Nancy Hirschl, CCS Victoria McKemy, MHA James Taylor, MD, CPC
HCCs and Star-Ratings: An IPA s Successful Approach to Revenue Integrity Nancy Hirschl, CCS Victoria McKemy, MHA James Taylor, MD, CPC 1 Introduction Agenda HCCs (Hierarchical Condition Categories) Diagnosis
Medicare Shared Savings Program Quality Measure Benchmarks for the 2015 Reporting Year
Medicare Shared Savings Program Quality Measure Benchmarks for the 2015 Reporting Year Release Notes/Summary of Changes (February 2015): Issued correction of 2015 benchmarks for ACO-9 and ACO-10 quality
Medicare Health Risk Assessment Questionnaire
Medicare Health Risk Assessment Questionnaire Instructions: Please complete and return it in the self-addressed stamped envelope provided. If you have questions or need help completing the questionnaire,
2015 HEDIS/CAHPS Effectiveness of Care Report for 2014 Service Measures Oregon, Idaho and Montana Commercial Business
2015 HEDIS/CAHPS Effectiveness of Care Report for 2014 Service Measures Oregon, Idaho and Montana Commercial Business About HEDIS The Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS 1 ) is a widely
Table 1 Performance Measures. Quality Monitoring P4P Yr1 Yr2 Yr3. Specification Source. # Category Performance Measure
Table 1 Performance Measures # Category Performance Measure 1 Behavioral Health Risk Assessment and Follow-up 1) Behavioral Screening/ Assessment within 60 days of enrollment New Enrollees who completed
NCQA Health Insurance Plan Ratings Methodology March 2015
NCQA Health Insurance Plan Ratings Methodology March 205 REVISION CHART Date Published March 205 Description Final version (next update will be based on the 50% measure exclusion rule) TABLE OF CONTENTS
OBJECTIVES AGING POPULATION AGING POPULATION AGING IMPACT ON MEDICARE AGING POPULATION
OBJECTIVES Kimberly S. Hodge, PhDc, MSN, RN, ACNS-BC, CCRN- K Director, ACO Care Management & Clinical Nurse Specialist Franciscan ACO, Inc. Central Indiana Region Indianapolis, IN By the end of this session
CMS MA Star Ratings Work Group Discussion Forum
CMS MA Star Ratings Work Group Discussion Forum 2016 First Plan Preview Period August 11, 2015 2016 CMS Star Ratings Updates 2 Methodology Changes to the Overall Star Rating For a few years CMS has expressed
All Medicare Advantage Organizations, Prescription Drug Plan Sponsors, and Other Interested Parties
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850 CENTER FOR MEDICARE DATE: November 12, 2015 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: All
Demonstrating Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements for Eligible Providers Using Certified EMR Technology
Demonstrating Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements for Eligible Providers Using Certified EMR Technology The chart below lists the measures (and specialty exclusions) that eligible providers must demonstrate
Contra Cost Health Plan Quality Program Summary November, 2013
Contra Cost Health Plan Quality Program Summary November, 2013 Mission Statement: Contra Costa Health Plan, along with our community and county health care providers, is committed to ensure our diverse
Medicare Benefit Review
Medicare Benefit Review What is Medicare? Medicare is Health Insurance For people 65 or older For people under 65 with certain disabilities For people at any age with End-Stage Renal Disease (permanent
Clinical Quality Measure Crosswalk: HEDIS, Meaningful Use, PQRS, PCMH, Beacon, 10 SOW
Clinical Crosswalk: HEDIS, Meaningful Use, PQRS, PCMH, Beacon, 10 SOW NQF 0105 PQRS 9 NQF 0002 PQRS 66 Antidepressant Medication Management Appropriate Testing for Children with Pharyngitis (2-18 years)
Population Health Management Program
Population Health Management Program Program (formerly Disease Management) is dedicated to improving our members health and quality of life. Our Population Health Management Programs aim to improve care
Florida Medicaid: Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services
Florida Medicaid: Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services Beth Kidder Assistant Deputy Secretary for Medicaid Operations Agency for Health Care Administration House Children, Families, and Seniors Subcommittee
Your Guide to Medicare Special Needs Plans (SNPs)
CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES Your Guide to Medicare Special Needs Plans (SNPs) This official government booklet has important information about Medicare Special Needs Plans, including the following:
The Healthy Michigan Plan Handbook
The Healthy Michigan Plan Handbook Introduction The Healthy Michigan Plan is a health care program through the Michigan Department of Community Health (MDCH). The Healthy Michigan Plan provides health
Did you know? There are 19 HEDIS/pharmacy measures currently used to gather data for provider reports.
STARS 101! Topics Did you know? Improve your Practice s Star Rating Focus Measures Targeting Care Opportunities Key Reminders Reporting Member Engagement Forms Resources Contact Information 2 Did you know?
2010 QARR QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE Adults
2010 QARR QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE Adults ADULT MEASURES (19 through 64 years) GUIDELINE HEDIS COMPLIANT CPT/ICD9 CODES DOCUMENTATION TIPS Well Care Access to Ambulatory Care Ensure a preventive or other
MaineCare Value Based Purchasing Initiative
MaineCare Value Based Purchasing Initiative The Accountable Communities Strategy Jim Leonard, Deputy Director, MaineCare Peter Kraut, Acting Accountable Communities Program Manager Why Value-Based Purchasing
ACO Name and Location Allina Health Minneapolis, Minnesota
ACO Name and Location Allina Health Minneapolis, Minnesota ACO Primary Contact Patrick Flesher Director, Payer Contracting & Pioneer ACO Program Email: [email protected] Phone: 612-262-4865 Composition
Medicare Basics and Medicare Advantage
Medicare Basics and Medicare Advantage Medicare The federal health insurance program for people age 65 and over, some disabled people under 65 years of age, and people with End-Stage Renal Disease (permanent
CAHPS Survey for the Medicare Shared Savings Program and Pioneer Model ACOs. Report for: ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATION
CAHPS Survey for the Medicare Shared Savings Program and Pioneer Model ACOs Report for: ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATION Issued September 2013 Table of Contents Part 1: Executive Summary... iii Part 2: Detailed
Special Needs Plan Model of Care 101
Special Needs Plan Model of Care 101 What is a Special Needs Plan? First of all it s a Medicare MA-PD, typically an HMO Consists of Medicare enrollees who meet special eligibility requirements In our case
