Characteristics of mobility



Similar documents
AEROSPACE INDUSTRY in the Berlin-Brandenburg Capital Region. THE GERMAN CAPITAL REGION excellence in mobility

Trends and issues Lake Te Koutu walkway, Cambridge

Traffic management by information: Ten years of Berlin Traffic Information Centre (TIC) from the operator s point of view

LOGISTICS. in the Berlin-Brandenburg Capital Region

New Zealand all-age mandatory bicycle helmet law

Accident configurations and injuries for bicyclists based on the German In-Depth Accident Study. Chiara Orsi

Transport Demand Management

BY-LAW NUMBER

statistics Berlin Brandenburg

How To Know If A Motorcyclist Is Safe

CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CONCEPTS

THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY

Road Transport and Road Traffic Accident Statistics (Island of Mauritius)

Dresden Mobility Strategy

Regional Cycling Strategy. May 2004

Deaths/injuries in motor vehicle crashes per million hours spent travelling, July 2008 June 2012 (All ages) Mode of travel

The total number of traffic collisions in Saskatchewan is up 5% from 51,733 in 2008 to 54,229 in 2009.

Analysis of Accidents by Older Drivers in Japan

Chapter 5. Transportation. Decatur County Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Goals and Objectives. Goal. Objectives. Goal.

Cycle safety. Monograph 17. Cycle safety: a national perspective. Cycle helmets

APPENDIX E TASK 5 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM: TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING PROCESS

Traffic Safety Facts. Children Data. Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for children from 2 to 14 years old.

CORPORATE TRAVEL PLAN. Key Messages

Bicycle and Public Transport Dream Team or Rivals? The Berlin Experience

Characteristics of Motorcycle Crashes in the U.S.

Rural Road Safety Policy in Korea: Lesson Learned

Multi Modal Roadway Transportation Impact Fees and Asset Value

NAPCS Product List for NAICS 5321: Automotive Equipment Rental and Leasing

AF1 Urban Environmental Planning WP 5 Urban Transport

IS CYCLING A SAFE MODE? COMPARING APPLES WITH APPLES

Hidden Subsidies for Urban Car Transportation Public Funds for Private Transport

Surveys If you want to find out what a large group of people think, the easiest thing to do is carry out a survey.

Reported Road Casualties Great Britain: 2013 Annual Report

How To Know If A Cyclist Is Safe

Road Transport and Road Traffic Accident Statistics (Island of Mauritius)

How To Understand The Safety Of A Motorcycle

Transport. Social Trends 41. Anna Donabie. Edition No: Social Trends 41 Editor: Jen Beaumont. Office for National Statistics

TDC Heavy Vehicle Forecasts - February 2010 Release 2008/09 HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY. SUMMARY REPORT 2010 Release

AUSTRIA. (Update to legislation effective 1 March 2014) Chapter prepared by. Walter Linszbauer (kfz@wko.at)

and 7 Queensland Transport, Moving People Connecting Communities: A Passenger Transport Strategy for Queensland , 2006

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material

Road fatalities in Road fatality: person killed in a traffic crash or deceased because of an injury within 30 days after the crash.

Risk of tractors in road traffic

Walking or Cycling? Facts about Extent, Safety and Environmental Consequences

Main figures on Road Safety Data Spain 2013

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT CYCLING STRATEGY 29 February 2008

Sustainable urban mobility: visions beyond Europe. Brest. Udo Mbeche, UN-Habitat

Statewide Survey on Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities

Nearly 38,000 vehicles cross the Shinnecock Canal on Sunrise Highway (NYS Route 27) daily, during peak summer months.

ATSB RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS REPORT ROAD SAFETY. Characteristics of Fatal Road Crashes During National Holiday Periods

STATISTICS OF FATAL AND INJURY ROAD ACCIDENTS IN LITHUANIA,

Appendix 1: ICD 10 AM (6th Edition) Cause of Injury Code and Description

Regional Road Safety Strategy September 2004

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and Ground Ambulance Crashes. April 2014

Children and road safety: a guide for parents

REGULATION ON TARIFF IMPLEMENTATION PRINCIPLES FOR MOTOR VEHICLES COMPULSORY THIRD PARTY LIABILITY INSURANCE

BERMUDA TRAFFIC OFFENCES (PENALTIES) ACT : 30

(Version 1.0 August 2014) Cover Letter. (See Paragraph 9 of Section 1A.10)

Chapter 1: Background

Cities for Mobility. World Congress 2008 City of Stuttgart June 1-4, The Transport System in the City of Yaoundé, Cameroon.

Connected mobility services to reduce individual traffic

V. Martínez Ruiz, E. Jiménez Mejías, C. Amezcua Prieto, J.D. Luna del Castillo, P. Lardelli Claret, J.J. Jiménez Moleón

Pilot Staff Bike Share Project. Induction Notes

INTERACTIONS BETWEEN ACCIDENT RATE AND TRAFFIC VOLUME

Mobility Management for Companies

Planning and Design for Sustainable Urban Mobility

Bicycle Safety Webinar December 1 st 2010

Cycle Strategy

HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT. Appendix 4. Proposed Design Principles for City Passings

EMTA BAROMETER OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN EUROPEAN METROPOLITAN AREAS (2004)

City Lights and Digital Billboards Berlin wtm Marketing & Vertriebsconsulting GmbH

Academic Reading sample task Identifying information

Oxfordshire Local Transport Plan Revised April Objective 3 Reduce casualties and the dangers associated with travel

Level 2 Award in Safe Driving at Work

Motor vehicle allowances (policy & procedure)

Road fatalities in Road fatality: any person killed immediately or dying within 30 days as a result of a road crash.

EFFECT OF A MOTORWAY ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF ACCIDENTS IN A BIG CITY

Eliminating Gridlock Through Effective Travel Demand Management and Urban Mobility Strategies

Speeding. Probability of death at different impact speeds

The German High Speed Rail System. DB International GmbH Ottmar Grein Bilbao,

A Bicycle Accident Study Using GIS Mapping and Analysis

Transcription:

Mobility in the City Characteristics of mobility On average, each Berliner makes three journeys per day, and in the process spends about 70 minutes in traffic. An interesting figure is that the proportion of journeys on foot in Berlin is almost as high as that of journeys covered by car. It is clear that inhabitants demonstrate different traffic behaviors depending on where they live in the city. Inhabitants of the Friedrichshain- Kreuzberg and districts make more journeys on foot than the inhabitants of other districts; for cycle traffic, the highest proportions 12

Berlin traffic data Characteristics of mobility are found in the Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg and districts; for public transportation, and ; and for road vehicles, and. Traffic behaviors depend on several factors. Forward-looking traffic planning and policy can create suitable basic conditions to guarantee mobility and the most environmentally friendly transportation possible. Further information on basic mobility data can be obtained for Berlin at www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/verkehr and nationwide data at http://tu-dresden.de/die_tu_dresden/ fakultaeten/vkw/ivs/vip/srv www.mobilitaet-in-deutschland.de 13

Mobility in the City Mobility profile () Mobility of the resident population Share of the mobile population 2) Average number of journeys of the resident population Average number of journeys of mobile persons 2) Average time spent in traffic Average length of journeys Average duration of journeys Average daily distance covered Rate of motorization Vehicle occupancy rate Number of bicycles 88.4 per cent of the resident population 3.0 journeys per person and day 3.4 journeys per person and day 70.1 minutes per person and day 6.9 kilometres per person and journey 24 minutes per person and journey 20.2 kilometres per person 358 3) cars per 1,000 inhabitants 1.3 persons per car journey 721 bicycles per 1,000 inhabitants No current data available. The SrV (System repräsentativer Verkehrsbefragung) traffic census is carried out at five-year intervals. The latest survey took place in 2013. The data is expected to be available at the end of 2014. 2) Those persons are regarded as mobile that change their whereabouts on an average working day. 3) The present rate of motorization is shown in the "Motorization" table (page 2. Source: System repräsentativer Verkehrsbefragung (SrV), TU Dresden Average journey time, distance and speed by mode of transport () 4) 45.0 40.0 40.1 35.0.0.0 24.9 20.0 22.2 15.0 10.0 14.0 17.6 11.6 9.5 17.0 12.3 Pedestrian traffic Bicycle traffic 5.0 Average journey time in min./journey 1.0 3.6 Average distance in km/journey 4.9 Public transport Private motorized transport Average speed in km/h 4) No current data available. The SrV (System repräsentativer Verkehrsbefragung) traffic census is carried out at five-year intervals. The latest survey took place in 2013. The data is expected to be available at the end of 2014 Source: System repräsentativer Verkehrsbefragung (SrV), TU Dresden 14

1998 1992 1998 1992 Berlin traffic data Characteristics of mobility Share of journeys by transport mode for traffic within Berlin () Share of journeys by transport mode for traffic to and from Berlin () Share of journeys by transport mode for total traffic in Berlin () Private motorized transport 31% Pedestrian % Private motorized transport 62% Pedestrian2% Bicycle traffic 2% Private motorized transport % Pedestrian 29% Public transport 26% Bicycle traffic 13% Public transport 34% Public transport 26% Bicycle traffic 13% Choice of transport mode in total traffic Use of transport mode by purpose of journey () Choice of transport mode in per cent Choice of transport mode in per cent 40 100 8 29 40 35 9 35 20 27 29 31 27 26 35 38 90 80 70 60 50 14 38 16 31 11 19 12 21 9 57 13 27 15 40 40 10 5 7 10 13 20 10 31 Employment Training Shopping/supplies Other purpose Recreation Home 1998 1992 Pedestrian traffic Bicycle traffic Public transport 1998 1992 Private motorized transport Pedestrian traffic Bicycle traffic Public transport Private motorized transport No current data available. The SrV (System repräsentativer Verkehrsbefragung) traffic census is carried out at five-year intervals. The latest survey took place in 2013. The data is expected to be available at the end of 2014 Source: System repräsentativer Verkehrsbefragung (SrV), TU Dresden 15

Mobility in the City Choice of transport mode by district () CharlottenburgWilmersdorf FriedrichshainKreuzberg TempelhofSchöneberg Choice of transport mode Pedestrian traffic Bicycle traffic Public transport Private motorized transport District No current data available. The SrV (System repräsentativer Verkehrsbefragung) traffic census is carried out at five-year intervals. The latest survey took place in 2013. The data is expected to be available at the end of 2014 Source: System repräsentativer Verkehrsbefragung (SrV), TU Dresden; Senate Department for Urban Development and the Environment of the State of Berlin Content processing: LK Argus GmbH 16

Berlin traffic data Characteristics of mobility Share of journeys of pedestrian traffic by district () 29 9 CharlottenburgWilmersdorf FriedrichshainKreuzberg < to <35 to < 35 21 District 10 to < 15 20 11 29 District Share of journeys of private motorized transport by district () 26 33 CharlottenburgWilmersdorf 26 22 44 FriedrichshainKreuzberg Share of journeys in per cent < 15 to < 20 44 TempelhofSchöneberg 27 23 < 10 29 23 28 CharlottenburgWilmersdorf 13 TempelhofSchöneberg 12 12 Share of journeys of public transport by district () FriedrichshainKreuzberg Share of journeys in per cent 22 6 21 13 Share of journeys in per cent 7 CharlottenburgWilmersdorf 29 TempelhofSchöneberg 29 24 14 8 17 35 26 Share of journeys of bicycle traffic by district () 17 TempelhofSchöneberg 40 38 FriedrichshainKreuzberg 40 Share of journeys in per cent District < 20 to < 35 to < 20 to < 35 to < 40 to < 40 District No current data available. The SrV (System repräsentativer Verkehrsbefragung) traffic census is carried out at five-year intervals. The latest survey took place in 2013. The data is expected to be available at the end of 2014 Source: System repräsentativer Verkehrsbefragung (SrV), TU Dresden; Senate Department for Urban Development and the Environment of the State of Berlin Content processing: LK Argus GmbH 17

Mobility in the City Commuters to and from Berlin (2012) Uckermark Prignitz Oberhavel Barnim Havelland Märkisch-Oderland Berlin Brandenburg an der Havel Potsdam Oder Spree Frankfurt (Oder) Dahme- Spreewald Potsdam- lmark Teltow-Fläming Spree-Neiße Commuters per working day In-commuters from Out-commuters to Brandenburg Brandenburg 2,500 2,500 Elbe-Elster Ostprignitz- Ruppin Oberspreewald- Lausitz Cottbus 5,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 20,000,000,000 Brandenburg state border Rural district border Basis: Registered employees subject to social insurance in Berlin as at.06.2012 Source: Employment statistics from the Federal Employment Agency, Nuremberg; calculations by the Joint Statistics Office for the States of Berlin and Brandenburg Content processing: LK Argus GmbH 18

Berlin traffic data Characteristics of mobility Commuters to and from Berlin Commuters per working day 0,000 0,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 2012 2010 2006 2004 2012 2010 2006 2004 2012 2010 2006 2004 2012 2010 2006 2004 In-commuters In-commuters from Brandenburg Out-commuters Out-commuters to Brandenburg Basis: Registered employees subject to social insurance in Berlin as at.06.2012 Source: Employment statistics from the Federal Employment Agency, Nuremberg; calculations by the Joint Statistics Office for the States of Berlin and Brandenburg Registered vehicles (2012) Shares of registered vehicles (2012) Number of registered vehicles 1,354,881 Cars 1,150,191 Motorbikes 99,099 Buses 2,126 Lorries 83,415 Cars 84,9% Motorbikes 7,3% Buses 0,2% Lorries 6,2% Tractor trucks 0,4% Self-propelled machines 0,3% Other 0,8% Tractor trucks 5,186 Self-propelled machines 3,589 Other 11,275 Number of vehicles on the road on (without trailer) Source: State Office for Residents and Regulatory Affairs, Berlin, vehicle licensing authority Source: State Office for Residents and Regulatory Affairs, Berlin, vehicle licensing authority 19

Mobility in the City Rate of motorization by statistical area (2012) Tempelhof- Schöneberg Charlottenburg- Wilmersdorf Friedrichshain- Kreuzberg Private cars per 1,000 inhabitants < 200 District 200 to <0 Statistical area 0 to <400 400 to <500 500 Source: Joint Statistics Office of the States of Berlin and Brandenburg; Senate Department for Urban Development and the Environment of the State of Berlin Content processing: LK Argus GmbH 20

Berlin traffic data Characteristics of mobility Motorization 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2010 2012 Population of Berlin, total 2) 3,466,524 3,414,293 3,384,146 3,390,291 3,387,545 3,399,896 3,424,638 3,446,972 3,348,189 Vehicles on the road, total 3) 1,277,847 1,265,6 1,289,919 1,291,409 1,272,151 1,262,121 1,287,740 1,331,074 1,349,562 Cars 1,095,185 1,120,592 1,113,999 1,109,103 1,091,437 1,078,3 1,097,201 1,133,869 1,145,616 Cars per 1,000 inhabitants 2 0 9 7 2 317 0 9 342 Average population of Berlin 2) Population figures for the years 1996 to 2010 are based on the old population projection. The data for the year 2012 is derived from population projections based on the census of 9 May 2011. This data is provisional. 3) Number of vehicles on the road on yearly average Source: Joint Statistics Office of the States of Berlin and Brandenburg; State Office for Residents and Regulatory Affairs, Berlin, vehicle licensing authority Motorization Motorization of households () 4) Number of vehicles Rate of motorization 1,350,000 1,3,000 348 342 1 car 48% 1,0,000 336 1,275,000 3 2 cars 7% more than 2 cars 1% 1,0,000 4 without car 45% 1,2,000 318 1,200,000 312 Vehicles 2012 2010 2006 2004 2002 2000 1998 1996 Cars per 1,000 inhabitants Source: Joint Statistics Office of the States of Berlin and Brandenburg; LABO, Berlin (inter alia vehicle licensing authority) 4) No current data available. The SrV (System repräsentativer Verkehrsbefragung) traffic census is carried out at five-year intervals. The latest survey took place in 2013. The data is expected to be available at the end of 2014 Source: System repräsentativer Verkehrsbefragung (SrV), TU Dresden 21