If your answer is no, please provide a brief statement (bullet points) of the respect(s) in which they fall short.



Similar documents
If your answer is no, please provide a brief statement (bullet points) of the respect(s) in which they fall short.

PG Dip/MSc Specialist Community Public Health Nursing School Nursing 2013/14

If your answer is no, please provide a brief statement (bullet points) of the respect(s) in which they fall short.

If your answer is no, please provide a brief statement (bullet points) of the respect(s) in which they fall short.

If your answer is no, please provide a brief statement (bullet points) of the respect(s) in which they fall short.

UNDERGRADUATE: EXTERNAL EXAMINER REPORT TEMPLATE

School of Management. External Examiner Reports 2013/14

Course Specification

Guidance by the General Board on the arrangements for External Examiners

Course Specification MSc Accounting (MSACT)

Course Specification

Course Specification. MA Physical Education (MPHYE) LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY

Programme Specification for Foundation Degree Facilities Management

Course Specification MSc Information Management (INMAM)

Teaching Institutions: Institute of Education, University of London

Programme Specifications

PART ONE : SUMMARY RESPONSE ON STANDARDS AND ASSESSMENT

School of Accounting Financial Services and Law. External Examiner Reports 2013/14

Course Specification

Awarding Institution: Institute of Education, University of London. Teaching Institutions: Institute of Education, University of London

Programme Specification

Programme Specification

Quality Handbook. Part D: Regulations. Section 16c: Taught postgraduate courses. Section16c. Nottingham Trent University

value equivalent value

External Examiner's Report Template Academic Year:

ROYAL HOLLOWAY University of London PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

School of Marketing Tourism and Languages. External Examiner Reports 2013/14

Mode of Study The MPH course will be delivered full-time and part-time on campus at the Kedleston Road site

N/A. Art and Design CONTENTS. This programme specification contains the following components:

COURSE OR HONOURS SUBJECT TITLE: BSc Hons Information Technologies with/without DPP/DPP(I)/DIAS with CertHE and AB exit awards (FT)

POSTGRADUATE PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Teaching Institutions: Institute of Education, University of London

Assessment Policy ISSUE DATE: JANUARY 2015 NEXT REVIEW DATE: JUNE 2016 EQUALITY & DIVERSITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT COMPLETED: RISK ASSESSMENT:

UNIVERSITY OF EAST LONDON UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION BA (Hons) Photography. This programme is only offered at: Barking & Dagenham College

Senate Regulation 6: Regulations governing taught postgraduate programmes of study

REPORT ON PROGRAMME VALIDATION/REVIEW Q 3

Higher Education Review of Guildford College of Further and Higher Education

University of Cambridge: Programme Specifications CERTIFICATE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MBA Higher Education Management. Awarding Institution: University College London

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION Select approval stage

Foundation Degree in Animation and Creative Video. This programme is only offered at Barking & Dagenham College

IX. Examination Conventions for Research Masters Degrees

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Course Specification. MSc Audio Engineering (MSADE) LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY

External Examiner Report

Programme Specification

Programme Specification: MSc Audit Management and Consultancy

Quality Assurance and Enhancement Documentation. 1.0 Introduction. 2.0 Standard Format. 3.0 Programme Approval Form. 4.0 Validation Documentation

180 credits. 6. Attendance Full-time Part-time Distance learning Mode of attendance Yes Yes No. Minimum length of programme 1 year 2 years N/A

EXTERNAL EXAMINER ANNUAL REPORT FORM

N/A. 1 year. 6 years

External examiner policy and procedures

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION Postgraduate Certificate in Consultancy for Educational Leadership Development

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION POSTGRADUATE PROGRAMMES

Review Process for University Departments and Academic Partnerships

MODULAR ASSESSMENT REGULATIONS (M A R)

Course Specification MSc International Tourism and Hospitality Management

Post Graduate Certificate in Learning and Teaching in Theatre and Performing Arts in Higher Education

AS T INTEGRATING WORK AND LEARNING. ASET Good Practice Guide for Work based and Placement Learning in Higher Education

Visitors report. Contents. Professional Doctorate in Forensic Psychology. Programme name. Date of visit January 2010

Teaching institution: Institute of Education, University of London

BSc (Honours) Computing and Information Systems (Distance Learning)

Teaching institution: Institute of Education, University of London

Full time 2 years Part time 3 years

For completion by External Examiner: Professor Robert W Duck University of Dundee. BSc Environmental Geoscience

Business and Creative Technologies

Programme Specification: Professional Graduate Certificate in Education Post-Compulsory Education and Training (Level 6) July 2011

What Is a Foundation Degree and How Does It Compliment the Collection of Students?

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MA/MSc Psychology of Education and the MA Education (Psychology)

PROGRAMME DETAIL SPECIFICATION. Programme Summary

Programme Specification MA MUSEUMS & GALLERIES IN EDUCATION. Awarding Institution Institute of Education University of London. Teaching Institution

How To Write A Degree Degree

IV. Masters Degree Progress Regulations, Taught and Research (excluding MPhil programmes)

MSc Forensic Accounting

All LJMU programmes are delivered and assessed in English

PGCert/PGDip/MA Education PGDip/Masters in Teaching and Learning (MTL) Programme Specifications

AQH-J1 ACCREDITATION OF PRIOR LEARNING (APL)

Programme Specification

Awarding Institution: Institute of Education, University of London. Teaching Institutions: Institute of Education, University of London

Programme specification for the M Phil in Technology Policy

Policy on Collaborative Provision UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM COLLABORATIVE PROVISION POLICY

How To Learn Forensic Psychology

How To Get A Masters Degree By Research

Reporting procedures for External Examiners. UNIVERSITY of CUMBRIA ACADEMIC PROCEDURES AND PROCESSES. APPENDIX 4e

Certificate of Higher Education in Legal Practice for Paralegals

Teaching institution: Institute of Education, University of London

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MSc Developmental and Educational Psychology. Teaching Institutions: UCL Institute of Education

RESEARCH DEGREES ACADEMIC FRAMEWORK

UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM CODE OF PRACTICE ON EXTERNAL EXAMINING (TAUGHT PROVISION)

Policy on Surveying and Responding to Student Opinion

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MA Educational Planning, Economics, and International Development

Advance with CIMA. Applying for CIMA Accreditation of Higher Education Programmes

UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON CONFIRMED

MASTER OF EDUCATION (TECHNICAL AND VOCATIONAL EDUCATION)

Course of Examination for Doctoral Studies Version for Readers 1

REPORT ON PROGRAMME VALIDATION/REVIEW Q 3. Master of Science in Product Management

REPORT ON PROGRAMME VALIDATION/REVIEW Q 3. [Prepared by the Validation/Review Panel and forwarded by the Academic Registrar to the Faculty Director]

MSc Educational Leadership and Management

Programme Specification

MA EDUCATION MA Education: Childhood and Youth Studies MA Education: Higher Education MA Education: Leadership and Management MA Education: TESOL

Transcription:

FdA Performance Management 2014/15 External Examiner s report summary Please indicate in the relevant boxes below whether you agree with the statements about the standards of Leeds Beckett University s awards, the standards of student performance and the conduct of the University s assessment processes. Please also list any shortcomings and areas for commendation. You should expand on any issues you mention here in the main report. If any boxes are ticked No the Dean of the Faculty or nominee will be alerted and will oversee the response from the course leader. Standards set In my view, the standards set for the awards are appropriate. Yes No Student performance In my view, the standards of student performance are comparable with similar course(s) or subjects in other UK institutions with which I am familiar. I have reviewed a sample of student work from the collaborative / franchise institution and in my view the standards of student performance are comparable with students studying the award(s) at Leeds Bekett. * * Not applicable if you are a practitioner and are not in a position to assess national standards please indicate here. Conduct of processes In my view, the processes for assessment, examination and the determination of awards are sound and fairly conducted. Yes No

Areas for commendation Any particular strengths or distinctive or innovative features in relation to standards and assessment processes The assessment for this award is to a high standard which offers the students an opportunity to excel using a broad base of both academic and practical knowledge gained on the course. The tutors have provided some good examples of real world application which is a benefit to the subject area. The assessment is set at the appropriate level for this award yet is it commendable the approach that has been taken which offers students an insight into the use of practical skills as well as academic concepts to promote their learning. Very good.

Main report In this section you are asked to describe more fully how the University has or has not maintained academic standards and the quality of the student experience in relation to the course(s) for which you are the external examiner. Please complete all sections of the form fully and where not applicable please state N/A. Where applicable please also complete the sections for any collaborative / franchise provision sampled. If you are an external examiner for any of the University s Pearson Edexcel (HND/HNC level) provision, please also complete the section on page 8 sections l, m and n entitled for External Examiners Associated with Edexcel Courses. Professional Body Requirements In my view, the professional body requirements for this course have been met. *Not applicable if the course is not a professional body course please indicate here. * (a) The operation and conduct of the Board of Examiners (and any Mitigation Panel or Examination Committee meeting you may also have attended). My experiences of the Board of Examiners have been of a high standard throughout the last 4 years. The notification process, administration and related documentation and also conduct within Board meetings have been professional and of a high standard generally. (b) The action, if any was required, taken in response to your report of last year. (This will not be relevant if you are examining for the first time.) Satisfactory. (c) The overall performance of the students, in relation to that of comparable levels of work in other institutions. The students results are of a high standard on this award generally and this is an indicator of the high levels of commitment and enthusiasm demonstrated by the tutors on this programme. A further benefit would be increased recruitment for this award which would encourage greater competition and the opportunity for knowledge sharing within this field.

(d) The strengths and weaknesses of the students in general with respect to knowledge, conceptual grasp or application of skills. As already indicated above, recruitment appears low on this award and would benefit the learning environment if larger class sizes were adopted. Also, given the nature of this award larger student numbers would increase opportunities for learning and also problem solving analysis which would be beneficial. (e) The standards of the structure, organisation, design and marking of all examination papers and/or other forms of assessment. A very high standard throughout of all assessment. The structure, organisation and distribution is a benefit to this award throughout. (f) The curriculum, teaching or resourcing of the programme of study as indicated by the performance of the students in the assessment. The use of practical application given by the tutors on this programme is beneficial. The curriculum appears very structured and well distributed throughout the course. This award also appears to be resourced to an appropriate level although class size appears small. (g) Comments on the use of -stream (VLE) within the course (if applicable).. Good where appropriate. (h) Module content, consistency of modules and module assessment across the course and the achievement of learning outcomes. (You may be asked by your Faculty to provide detailed comments on the modules that you examine.) Learning outcomes appear to be met to a high standard and tutors are accessible and active in shaping the modules to suit student requirements. (i) Areas of good practice you have identified please expand on the key areas for commendation listed in the summary. Practical application throughout this programme is of a high standard which is key in preparation for the world of work. The organisation and delivery of the modules and their content is very good throughout.

(j) The University welcomes external examiners comments on its developing academic regulatory framework. Such comments may not have a direct bearing on standards set and achieved or the conduct of processes and so it may not be appropriate to include them elsewhere in this report or its summary. Please record any concerns or comments you may have here. Satisfactory. (k) Collaborative / Franchise Provision: please include here any comments you wish to make on elements of collaborative / franchise provision for which you have responsibility (in addition to those you may have indicated previously in this report). No further comments.

External Examiners Report Checklist Please comment for all boxes Course Materials Did you receive? a. Course Handbook(s)? b. Academic Regulations including any Professional Statutory Body requirements where appropriate (these may be included the Course Handbook)? c. Module specifications (these may be in the Course Handbook)? d. Assessment briefs/marking criteria? Draft examination papers a. (i) Did you receive all the draft papers? (ii) If not, was this at your request? b. (i) Was the nature and level of the questions appropriate? (ii) If not, were suitable arrangements made to consider your comments? c. Were suitable arrangements made to consider your comments? Draft coursework a. (i) Did you receive all the draft coursework? (ii) If not, was this at your request? b. (i) Was the nature and level of the coursework appropriate? (ii) If not, were suitable arrangements made to consider your comments? c. Were suitable arrangements made to consider your comments?

Marking Examination Scripts (i) Did you receive a sufficient number of scripts from both home and (if a. appropriate) collaborative / franchise partner students? If you did not receive all the scripts, was the method of selection (ii) satisfactory? Recommended sample sizes at Leeds Beckett University are as follows: a) Samples should be determined by a square root of cohort size, no smaller than 6, no larger than 15. However it should be borne in mind that not all work is assessed in a way that makes a square root sample possible and allowance should be made. For example in subjects such as the performing arts where there may be a requirement for an external to come and view a performance instead, or to visit the exhibition of art work. b) Samples to include all classification categories, and it is helpful to concentrate around the boundaries to include some fails. c) Samples to consist of internally moderated work, clearly evidencing the moderation process. b. Was the general standard and consistency of marking appropriate? c. Were the scripts marked in such a way to enable you to see the reasons for the award of given marks? Dissertations/project reports a. Was the choice of subjects for dissertations appropriate? b. Was the method and standard of assessment appropriate? Coursework/continuously assessed work a. Was sufficient coursework made available to you for assessment from both home and (if appropriate) collaborative / franchise partner students? b. Was the method and general standard of marking and consistency satisfactory? Orals/performances/recitals/appropriate professional placements a. Were suitable arrangements made for you to conduct orals and/or moderate performances/recitals/appropriate professional placements? Examination Committee/Board of Examiners a. Were you able to attend the meetings? b. Were the meetings conducted to your satisfaction? c. Were you satisfied with the recommendations of the Examination Committee/Board of Examiners?