Reporting procedures for External Examiners. UNIVERSITY of CUMBRIA ACADEMIC PROCEDURES AND PROCESSES. APPENDIX 4e
|
|
|
- Chrystal Mitchell
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 UNIVERSITY of CUMBRIA ACADEMIC PROCEDURES AND PROCESSES APPENDIX 4e Reporting procedures for External Examiners 1
2 Reporting procedures for External Examiners 1. External Examiner s Report 1.1 The University attaches great significance to and values greatly the annual reports of External Examiners as they form a vital part of the documentation used within its Quality Assurance Process as the attached flow chart shows. Relevant staff, including those at a senior level, read all reports carefully and give serious consideration to all issues raised. Reports are made available to students through programme Blackboard sites. The University seeks to ensure that appropriate action is taken and that the feedback/quality loop is closed. All External Examiners are advised of the action taken. 2. Completion and submission of the Annual Report 2.1 Format and content of the Report External Examiners are asked to complete the annual report critically but fairly using the template and bearing in mind the points listed below. The report is for the University s use and consists of sections on the following with points to be commented on in each. i. The academic standards demonstrated by the students and where possible their performance in relation to students on comparable courses. ii. The extent to which standards are appropriate for the award iii. Opportunities to enhance the quality of the learning opportunities provided to students iv. Good practice and innovation regarding teaching, learning and assessment observed by the External Examiner v. Organisation and arrangements in the assessment process vi. Other comments External Examiners for franchised Collaborative Programmes are asked to comment on each collaborative partner within the context of their report In their final report (i.e. in the final year of appointment), External Examiners are asked to include in it an overview on the progress that has been made during their period of the office. This information will also serve to inform the incoming External Examiner about the developments during the previous period review. Points on which the External Examiner can base their report are listed on the template If an External Examiner has serious concerns arising from the assessment process which put at risk the standards of the University or any relevant external awarding body, these must be raised with the Chair of the Module Assessment Board (by Subject External Examiners) or the chair of the University Assessment Board (by Award External Examiners) in the first instance. Should an External Examiner wish to raise matters of particular importance or sensitivity, this can be done by way of a separate, confidential report addressed to the Vice Chancellor. 2
3 2.2 Submitting the Report The fully completed reports must be returned via to the Academic Quality and Development Service by 31 July or within six weeks of the Assessment Board. Payment of External Examiners fees will be conditional upon completion of the report. 2.3 Use within the University As explained above, the External Examiner s report is an important part of the University s quality assurance process. In preparing their reports, External Examiners are protected by qualified privilege 1 so the views expressed are the Examiners and not those held by anyone else The Examiner retains the copyright of the report but the University is entitled to use the report by way of implied licence. This may include publishing in part or whole External examiners should be aware that under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act 2005 the University is required to publish all information (not covered by exemption) if requested. In view of this it is important that External Examiners do not include in their report any reference to individuals by name External Examiner reports will be shared with students (with the exception of confidential reports) External Examiners will be made aware that under the requirements of the Data Protection Act students can request a copy of any comments made on their scripts, or any reports made by External Examiners on their work, and if requested the University will be required to provide this information. 3. Guidelines for completion 3.1 The following points should be borne in mind when completing the report i. No individual student or member of staff should be identified by name ii. iii. iv. The format of the report templates should not be altered in any way Joint reports from External Examiners are not acceptable as the University prefers independent views to be expressed In line with Section B7 of the UK Quality Code for Higher Education, External Examiner reports will, with effect from September 2012, be shared with students through programme level Blackboard sites. The AQD service undertakes checks of all reports prior to publication to ensure that there are no inadvertent breaches of confidentiality. 1 Explained in HEFCE Information on quality and standards in higher education: final guidance (annex g) available at 3
4 4. Responding to the Report 4.1 Subject Examiners The Programme Leader shall be required to provide a full and considered formal response to the Subject External Examiner s report. Responses are required to provide detail of any actions resulting from reports, or reasons for not taking action. Responses are required to be shared with relevant staff In the case of franchised collaborative provision, the University Programme Leader shall be responsible for responding to the Subject Examiner s report, with input from the Partner Programme Leader. In the case of validated collaborative provision the Partner Programme Leader shall be responsible for responding to the report and this must be approved by the linked University Programme Leader All responses must be provided to the Academic Quality and Development Service who will ensure that the response is sent to the External Examiner in line with agreed protocols. The report and response will be shared by the Programme Leader with relevant staff and will feed in to the University s annual monitoring processes. Subject External Examiner s reports should be shared with students through Blackboard sites. 4.2 Award Examiners The Head of AQD shall be required to respond formally to Award External Examiners reports. The Academic Quality and Development Service will ensure that responses are sent to External Examiners in line with agreed protocols. The reports and responses will feed in to the University s annual summary of External Examiner reports considered by AQSC. 4.3 Confidential Reports to the Vice-Chancellor The Vice-Chancellor shall respond to any confidential reports submitted to the University. 5. Review of the process 5.1 This process will be reviewed regularly taking account of best practice and Sector policy. 4
5 External Examiner Reports & University Quality Assurance and Enhancement Processes External Examiner Academic Board External Examiner Report AQSC Senior Policy Officer reviews all reports to produce the Annual Summary of External Examiners Reports. Areas of concern are escalated to the Associate Dean and/or Heads of Service as appropriate Academic Quality and Development Service University of Cumbria Programme Leader (copied to HoD) Programme Leader s Response to Subject Examiner s Report Chair of AQSC (if required) AQD Proof-checked version of EE Report is posted on Programme level Blackboard site (see 3.1(iv) above) Programme Leader s Annual Evaluatory Report Department Annual Evaluatory report (AER) 5
UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM CODE OF PRACTICE ON EXTERNAL EXAMINING (TAUGHT PROVISION)
UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM CODE OF PRACTICE ON EXTERNAL EXAMINING (TAUGHT PROVISION) 1 Index of points 1. Principles 2. Appointment of External Examiners 3. Induction 4. Enhancement of Quality 5. Scrutiny
Corporate Information Security Policy
Corporate Information Security Policy. A guide to the Council s approach to safeguarding information resources. September 2015 Contents Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Information Security Framework 2 3. Objectives
Associate College and Associate Department Approval process
Collaborative Programmes Office Quality Management Division Associate College and Associate Department Approval process The University may, from time to time, wish to confer the status of Associate College
Professional Doctorate Regulations: Doctor of Education (EdD) International
Professional Doctorate Regulations: Doctor of Education (EdD) International 1. Introduction (a) These regulations govern the delivery and assessment of the EdD International which is an award of Roehampton
Donations Policy and Accounting Procedures
Donations Policy and Accounting Procedures Originator name: Department: Chris Gethin / Ruth Anderson Alumni & Development Office / Finance Department Implementation date: 1 July 2011 (Revised February
Guidance by the General Board on the arrangements for External Examiners
Guidance by the General Board on the arrangements for External Examiners Contents 1. Purpose... 2 2. Roles and responsibilities... 2 Setting and reviewing question papers... 2 Moderating examination scripts:...
Information Governance Policy
Information Governance Policy Document Number 01 Version Number 2.0 Approved by / Date approved Effective Authority Customer Services & ICT Authorised by Assistant Director Customer Services & ICT Contact
Barnsley Clinical Commissioning Group. Information Governance Policy and Management Framework
Putting Barnsley People First Barnsley Clinical Commissioning Group Information Governance Policy and Management Framework Version: 1.1 Approved By: Governing Body Date Approved: 16 January 2014 Name of
QUALITY ASSURANCE OPERATIONAL FRAMEWORK. University of Liverpool. Liverpool, L69 7ZX. And. Laureate
QUALITY ASSURANCE OPERATIONAL FRAMEWORK The University of Liverpool Liverpool, L69 7ZX And INTRODUCTION Laureate The Institutional Agreement is between (1) the University of Liverpool ( UoL ) whose registered
Professional Doctorate Regulations: Doctor of Education (EdD) for Students Registering after January 2012
Professional Doctorate Regulations: Doctor of Education (EdD) for Students Registering after January 2012 Introduction 1. Preamble (a) This programme is a Joint Award approved and delivered by Roehampton
INFORMATION GOVERNANCE POLICY
INFORMATION GOVERNANCE POLICY Version Version 1 Ratified By Date Ratified PROPOSED FOR APPROVAL 15/11/12 Author(s) Responsible Committee / Officers Date Issue November 2012 Review Date November 2013 Intended
Review Process for University Departments and Academic Partnerships
Procedure Review Process for University Departments and Academic Partnerships Contents Introduction... 3 Purpose of Review... 4 Stages of the Review Process... 5 Membership of the Review Panel... 5 Areas
Blacklisting Procedure
Blacklisting Procedure Related Policy ICT Services and Facilities Use Policy Responsible Approved by Approved and commenced August, 2014 Review by August, 2017 Responsible Organisational Unit Information
2.2 Assessors shall not be members of Boards or Joint Boards of Examiners and shall not be entitled unless invited to attend their meetings.
Regulations for the Examination of Master s Level Degrees 1 Appointment of Examiners 1 Definition of Terms Used: Examiners 1.1 Members of Boards of Examiners shall be designated as Examiners, as follows:
UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK
UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK This guidance document should be read in conjunction with Regulation 38 Governing Research Degrees (see www.go.warwick.ac.uk/calendar/regulations). Requirements for the award of Research
NEWLY CREATED / REVISED POSTS JOB MATCHING POLICY AND PROCEDURE
YMDDIRIEDOLAETH GIG CEREDIGION A CHANOLBARTH CYMRU CEREDIGION AND MID WALES NHS TRUST NEWLY CREATED / REVISED POSTS JOB MATCHING POLICY AND PROCEDURE Author Director of Human Resources Equality impact
E2E Project Management Process Governance (Electric Capital)
Attachment AG-1-8-10 Page 1 of 10 E2E Project Management Process Governance (Electric Capital) Report No. 1332 Final Distribution Final Report Audit Team: Report Grading: Number of Findings: Date of issue
MODULAR ASSESSMENT REGULATIONS (M A R)
University of the West of England, Bristol MODULAR ASSESSMENT REGULATIONS (M A R) MAR Version 2.3, September 2002 1 THE MODULAR SCHEME ASSESSMENT REGULATIONS (MAR Version 2.3: September 2002) 1 DEFINITIONS
SOLOMON ISLANDS NATIONAL UNIVERSITY TRANSPORT POLICY
SOLOMON ISLANDS NATIONAL UNIVERSITY TRANSPORT POLICY Approved by Council, 20 th August 2014 Contents TRANSPORT POLICY... 3 (1). PURPOSE... 3 (2). DEFINITIONS... 3 (3). AUTHORITY... 3 (4). RESPONSIBILITY...
Data Governance Policy. Staff Only Students Only Staff and Students. Vice-Chancellor
Name of Policy Description of Policy Policy applies to Data Governance Policy To establish proper standards to assure the quality and integrity of University data. This policy also defines the roles and
ANGUS COUNCIL SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT. SC 01 - Contract Performance Guarantee Insurance
SC 01 - Contract Performance Guarantee Insurance For contracts equal to or exceeding 750,000 in value the Contractor shall, within 28 days of the date of the award of the Contract, obtain and provide to
LORD CHANCELLOR S CODE OF PRACTICE ON THE MANAGEMENT OF RECORDS UNDER
LORD CHANCELLOR S CODE OF PRACTICE ON THE MANAGEMENT OF RECORDS UNDER SECTION 46 OF THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000 NOVEMBER 2002 Presented to Parliament by the Lord Chancellor Pursuant to section
Data Protection Policy June 2014
Data Protection Policy June 2014 Approving authority: Consultation via: Court Audit and Risk Committee, University Executive, Secretary's Board, Information Governance and Security Group Approval date:
Regulation 8.3.R2 COMPUTING AND NETWORK FACILITIES RULES. 1. Definitions. In this regulation unless a contrary intention appears.
Regulation 8.3.R2 COMPUTING AND NETWORK FACILITIES RULES 1. Definitions In this regulation unless a contrary intention appears Authority means (i) in relation to the central facilities and computing and
Explaining an architect s services. General information on the usual tasks undertaken by an architect
Explaining an architect s services General information on the usual tasks undertaken by an architect June 2008 What an architect may do for you Introduction The root cause of disputes and complaints against
GUIDANCE FOR BOARDS OF EXAMINERS IN PARTNER COLLEGES. Degrees, Top-up Degrees and Foundation Degrees
GUIDANCE FOR BOARDS OF EXAMINERS IN PARTNER COLLEGES Degrees, Top-up Degrees and Foundation Degrees Revised February 2015 GUIDANCE FOR BOARDS OF EXAMINERS IN PARTNER COLLEGES Degrees, Top-up degrees and
Professional Doctorate Regulations: Doctor of Psychology (PsychD) in Forensic Psychology [Course Code 81RS004]
Professional Doctorate Regulations: Doctor of Psychology (PsychD) in Forensic Psychology [Course Code 81RS004] 1. Application and Registration Parts 1 & 2 (a) Applications to the PsychD Forensic Psychology
Eligibility to Serve as a Principal Investigator for Research Involving Human Subjects
Eligibility to Serve as a Principal Investigator for Research Involving Human Subjects Statement of Policy Tenured or tenure track Purdue faculty, including emeriti, who are certified by Purdue University
Decision 131/2008 Mr N and East Ayrshire Council. Tender Documents. Reference No: 200800298 Decision Date: 7 October 2008
Decision 131/2008 Tender Documents Reference No: 200800298 Decision Date: 7 October 2008 Kevin Dunion Scottish Information Commissioner Kinburn Castle Doubledykes Road St Andrews KY16 9DS Tel: 01334 464610
Academic and Administrative Framework
Agreement for Dual PhD Degree between XXXX and the University of Liverpool Academic and Administrative Framework 1. Rationale for the collaborative partnership a) This agreement is designed to establish
professional engineers board singapore
GUIDELINES ON THE APPLICATION FOR A LICENCE TO SUPPLY PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 1. The Professional Engineers Act provides for professional engineers to team up with allied professionals to form
RESEARCH DEGREE REGULATIONS
RESEARCH DEGREE REGULATIONS These regulations apply to programmes of study leading to the award of Master of Philosophy and Doctor of Philosophy, including the Doctor of Philosophy awarded on the basis
ORDINANCE 11 CENTRAL ACADEMIC BODIES
CENTRAL ACADEMIC BODIES DEFINITIONS a Central Academic Body is an educational, academic or research institution established in accordance with Statute 17.1 and listed in Appendix 2 of the Statutes. These
Summary of the role and operation of NHS Research Management Offices in England
Summary of the role and operation of NHS Research Management Offices in England The purpose of this document is to clearly explain, at the operational level, the activities undertaken by NHS R&D Offices
Information Governance Strategy. Version No 2.0
Plymouth Community Healthcare CIC Information Governance Strategy Version No 2.0 Notice to staff using a paper copy of this guidance. The policies and procedures page of PCH Intranet holds the most recent
APPOINTMENT PROCEDURES FOR SENIOR ACADEMICAND ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS OF THE UNIVERSITY
A B C D Introduction APPOINTMENT PROCEDURES FOR SENIOR ACADEMICAND ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS OF THE UNIVERSITY General Selection Committees Academic Tenure and Senior Appointments Rules for the Operation
INFORMATION GOVERNANCE OPERATING POLICY & FRAMEWORK
INFORMATION GOVERNANCE OPERATING POLICY & FRAMEWORK Log / Control Sheet Responsible Officer: Chief Finance Officer Clinical Lead: Dr J Parker, Caldicott Guardian Author: Associate IG Specialist, Yorkshire
Director of Strategic Planning and Finance
Ashcroft International Business School Job Description Job Title: Grade: Work Base: Hours of Work: Responsible to: Responsible for: Relationships and Contacts: Director of Strategic Planning and Finance
Information Governance Policy
Author: Susan Hall, Information Governance Manager Owner: Fiona Jamieson, Assistant Director of Healthcare Governance Publisher: Compliance Unit Date of first issue: February 2005 Version: 5 Date of version
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY. Information Security Policy. 1.0 Introduction
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY Information Security Policy 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Information in all of its forms is crucial to the effective functioning and good governance of our University. We are committed
Information Governance Policy
Information Governance Policy Version 1.1 Responsible Person Information Governance Manager Lead Director Head of Corporate Services Consultation Route Information Governance Steering Group Approval Route
How To Write A Degree Degree
TAUGHT DEGREE REGULATIONS These regulations apply to programmes of study leading to undergraduate awards and taught postgraduate awards at Master s Level except in cases where professional body requirements
Information Governance Strategy & Policy
Information Governance Strategy & Policy March 2014 CONTENT Page 1 Introduction 1 2 Strategic Aims 1 3 Policy 2 4 Responsibilities 3 5 Information Governance Reporting Structure 4 6 Managing Information
EVALUATION OF TEACHING AND COURSES POLICY
University of Fort Hare Policies and Procedures EVALUATION OF TEACHING AND COURSES POLICY TITLE: Evaluation of Teaching and Courses Policy Policy no TLC 007 Approved Date approved Minute Effective Date
This Policy was approved by 2014.
WEB PUBLISHING POLICY This Policy was approved by Senate onn 4 June 2014 and came into force on 1 July 2014. 1 Introduction Overview This Policy applies to all websites published under the aston.ac.uk
This section outlines the Solvency II requirements for a syndicate s own risk and solvency assessment (ORSA).
Section 9: ORSA Overview This section outlines the Solvency II requirements for a syndicate s own risk and solvency assessment (ORSA). The ORSA can be defined as the entirety of the processes and procedures
Information Governance Policy
Information Governance Policy Version: 4 Bodies consulted: Caldicott Guardian, IM&T Directors Approved by: MT Date Approved: 27/10/2015 Lead Manager: Governance Manager Responsible Director: SIRO Date
Senate. SEN15-P17 11 March 2015. Paper Title: Enhancing Information Governance at Loughborough University
SEN15-P17 11 March 2015 Senate Paper Title: Enhancing Information Governance at Loughborough University Author: Information Technology & Governance Committee 1. Specific Decision Required by Committee
Information Governance Policy
Information Governance Policy Reference: Information Governance Policy Date Approved: April 2013 Approving Body: Board of Trustees Implementation Date: April 2013 Version: 6 Supersedes: 5 Stakeholder groups
Policy on Collaborative Provision 2015-16 UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM COLLABORATIVE PROVISION POLICY
UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM COLLABORATIVE PROVISION POLICY 1 Index of points 1. Introduction 2. Definitions of 3. Development of 4. Principles of Arrangements 5. Further Information and Documentation Appendix
Secondment is not an entitlement and is subject to approval by the delegated officer.
Secondment Last updated: 29 January 2010 Policy assigned to: Director, Human Resources Overview This policy sets out the guidelines and procedures to be followed by staff entering into secondment arrangements.
MASSEY UNIVERSITY COLLEGE RESEARCH CENTRE AGREEMENT
MASSEY UNIVERSITY COLLEGE RESEARCH CENTRE AGREEMENT Agreement effective from: PARTIES: Between the Vice-Chancellor and the Pro Vice-Chancellor of the College of College of Sciences concerning the operation
COMPLIANCE FRAMEWORK AND REPORTING GUIDELINES
COMPLIANCE FRAMEWORK AND REPORTING GUIDELINES DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION June 2015 38 Cavenagh Street DARWIN NT 0800 Postal Address GPO Box 915 DARWIN NT 0801 Email: [email protected] Website:
Information Governance Policy A council-wide information management policy. Version 1.0 June 2013
Information Governance Policy Version 1.0 June 2013 Copyright Notification Copyright London Borough of Islington 2012 This document is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 license. This
ANNEX 8 Contract Management Strategy
ANNEX 8 Contract Management Strategy Bath & North East Somerset, Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire Councils working together to improve your local transport Contract Management Strategy
IV. Masters Degree Progress Regulations, Taught and Research (excluding MPhil programmes)
IV. Masters Degree Progress Regulations, Taught and Research (excluding MPhil programmes) These regulations shall be understood in conjunction with requirements laid down in the General Regulations and
Software Support and Maintenance Terms
Software Support and Maintenance Terms 1. Definitions and interpretation 1.1 This agreement uses some terms with special meanings. These terms are set out in schedule 1 to this agreement. The schedule
www.monitor.gov.uk The NHS Foundation Trust Code of Governance
www.monitor.gov.uk The NHS Foundation Trust Code of Governance About Monitor Monitor is the sector regulator for health services in England. Our job is to protect and promote the interests of patients
ESKISP6054.01 Conduct security testing, under supervision
Overview This standard covers the competencies required to conduct security testing under supervision. In order to contribute to the determination of the level of resilience of an information system to
Information Governance Strategy. Version No 2.1
Livewell Southwest Information Governance Strategy Version No 2.1 Notice to staff using a paper copy of this guidance. The policies and procedures page of LSW Intranet holds the most recent version of
Protection. Code of Practice. of Personal Data RPC001147_EN_WB_L_1
Protection of Personal Data RPC001147_EN_WB_L_1 Table of Contents Data Protection Rules Foreword From the Data Protection Commissioner Introduction From the Chairman Data Protection Responsibility of Employees
DATA PROTECTION CORPORATE POLICY
DATA PROTECTION CORPORATE POLICY Information Management V1.1 03 July 2012 Not protectively marked This policy must be complied with fully by all Members, Officers Agents and Contractors of Plymouth City
Programme Specification Date amended: May 2006
Programme Specification Template Programme Specification Date amended: May 2006 1. Programme Title(s) and UCAS code(s): BA (Hons) Security and Risk Management 2. Awarding body or institution: University
Information Governance Framework
Information Governance Framework March 2014 CONTENT Page 1 Introduction 1 2 Strategic Aim 2 3 Purpose, Values and Principles 2 4 Scope 3 5 Roles and Responsibilities 3 6 Review 5 Appendix 1 - Information
POLICY. Responsible Use of Social Media
POLICY Responsible Use of Social Media Contact Officer Director of Personnel Director of Communications & Participation Senior Project Manager: Corporate Policies (Policy author) Purpose The primary aims
Procedures for validation and accreditation
Procedures for validation and accreditation Published by the Quality and Academic Support Office, Directorate of Students and Education Support Latest Edition (March 2002, updated August 2009 and 2013
POLICY. 1) Business Continuity Management 2) Disaster Recovery 3) Critical Incident Management 4) Risk Management
POLICY Policy Title: Management Descriptors: 1) Management 2) Disaster Recovery 3) Critical Incident Management 4) Risk Management Category: Risk Management Intent Organisational Scope Definitions Policy
Data Protection Act a more detailed guide
Data Protection Act a more detailed guide What does the Act do? The Data Protection Act 1998 places considerable duties on organisations which process personal data; increases the rights of access by data
POLICY FOR THE ADMINISTRATION AND AWARD OF DOUBLE BADGED DOCTORAL DEGREES
DEPUTY VICE-CHANCELLOR AND VICE-PRESIDENT (RESEARCH) ADELAIDE GRADUATE CENTRE POLICY FOR THE ADMINISTRATION AND AWARD OF DOUBLE BADGED DOCTORAL DEGREES Authorised By: Vice-Chancellor and President Date
Bath Spa University Research Degree Regulations 2014-15
Bath Spa University Research Degree Regulations 2014-15 Approved by Academic Board 22 July 2014 1. Supervised Research Degrees 1.1 Master of Philosophy (MPhil), Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Professional
4.7 Website Privacy Policy
Policy Statement The is committed to ensuring that its departments, offices, agencies, boards, and commissions adhere to the privacy protection provisions of the Freedom of Information and Protection of
KEELE UNIVERSITY IT INFORMATION SECURITY POLICY
Contents 1. Introduction 2. Objectives 3. Scope 4. Policy Statement 5. Legal and Contractual Requirements 6. Responsibilities 7. Policy Awareness and Disciplinary Procedures 8. Maintenance 9. Physical
Information Governance Policy
Policy Policy Number / Version: v2.0 Ratified by: Audit Committee Date ratified: 25 th February 2015 Review date: 24 th February 2016 Name of originator/author: Name of responsible committee/individual:
ROEHAMPTON UNIVERSITY DATA PROTECTION POLICY
ROEHAMPTON UNIVERSITY DATA PROTECTION POLICY Originated by: Data Protection Working Group: November 2008 Impact Assessment: (to be confirmed) Recommended by Senate: 28 January 2009 Approved by Council:
Manchester Metropolitan University. Policy for the Reporting and Investigation of Accidents and Incidents
Manchester Metropolitan University Policy for the Reporting and Investigation of Accidents and Incidents 1 Contents Section 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose 1.2 Scope & Definitions 1.3 Roles and Responsibilities
