FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY LABORATORY OFFICE OF CHIEF MEDICAL EXAMINER CITY OF NEW YORK PROFICIENCY TESTING

Similar documents
Title 17 California Code of Regulations

Jeffery L. Zehnder Forensic Toxicologist Curriculum Vitae Revised November 8, 2013

Validation and Calibration. Definitions and Terminology

1. PURPOSE To provide a written procedure for laboratory proficiency testing requirements and reporting.

5 YEAR CORPORATE STRATEGIC PLAN MEDICAL BUREAU OF ROAD SAFETY

Drug and Alcohol Policy

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 12, 2010, unless a later date is cited at the end of a section. [ NMAC - Rp, NMAC, 02/12/2010]

How To Test For Illegal Drugs And Alcohol

2013 Annual Toxicology Report

of the senior officers and representatives of the American Board

Control Charts and Trend Analysis for ISO Speakers: New York State Food Laboratory s Quality Assurance Team

DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING REGULATIONS

Forensic Science Course Syllabus (CHE100)

General. What is a laboratory test? What is a waived test?

2009 LAP Audioconference Series. Laboratory Computer Systems

American Society of Addiction Medicine

Content Sheet 10-1: Overview of External Quality Assessment (EQA)

ASSURING THE QUALITY OF TEST RESULTS

Proficiency Testing In A Global Analytical Environment Benefits & Challenges. AOAC September 2007

Central Government Laboratory Department of Health and Environment

THE COLLEGE OF WESTERN IDAHO PTE PROGRAMS DRUG FREE SCHOOL POLICY

Substance Abuse Program

UCLA PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN

Laboratory Computer Systems

Factors Influencing LC/MS/MS Moving into Clinical and Research Laboratories

College of American Pathologists Accreditation for Public Health Laboratories

LABORATORY SUPERVISOR JOB CODE: 2701 DATE: 11/8/95

SureStep Pro Linearity Test Kit and Analytical Measurement Range Verification (AMR)

Contents. Abstract...i. Committee Membership... iii. Foreword... vii. 1 Scope...1

Prepublication Requirements

NC SBI QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

Evaluating Laboratory Data. Tom Frick Environmental Assessment Section Bureau of Laboratories

Idaho State Police. Service Since Jeremy Johnston Forensic Scientist III 615 W Wilbur Ave Coeur d Alene ID (208) FAX (208)

Procedure 5202P Personnel

The Facts on Equine Drug Testing

American Association for Laboratory Accreditation

A Guideline for California From California Public Protection and Physician Health, Inc.

Curriculum Vitae. EDUCATION Bachelor of Science Major: Zoology; Minor Chemistry (1980) South Dakota State University Brookings, SD

CAP Point of Care Checklist Frequently Asked Questions Roger D. Klein, MD Sheldon Campbell, MD, PhD Peter J. Howanitz, MD

Substance Abuse Service Delivery Model

APPENDIX N. Data Validation Using Data Descriptors

Drug Testing for Criminal Justice Involved Individuals in Michigan

What Can I Do With a Degree in ForSci?

Rail Safety (Alcohol and Drug Testing) Regulations 2008

FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY LABORATORY GUIDELINES

State Recommended Drug Free Workplace Policy

2010 Laboratory Accreditation Program Audioconference. Accreditation Requirements for Waived Vs. Non-waived Tests

Validation of measurement procedures

STATES OF JERSEY. DRAFT ROAD TRAFFIC (No. 62) (JERSEY) REGULATIONS 201-

Indiana State Department of Toxicology 2012 Annual Report

SOUTH DAKOTA VETERINARY MEDICAL EXAMINING BOARD APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION: VETERINARY TECHNICIAN

Urinalysis Compliance Tools. POCC Webinar January 19, 2011 Dr. Susan Selgren

Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) How to Obtain a CLIA Certificate

The County of San Bernardino Department of Behavioral Health

Volume 22 Number 22. C43-A ISBN ISSN Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) Confirmation of Drugs; Approved Guideline

DC Office of the Chief Medical Examiner Standard Operating Procedures

Drug and Alcohol Testing for Safety- and Security-sensitive Positions

ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES CLASS SPECIFICATION FORENSIC SCIENTIST SERIES

NATIONAL DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING PROGRAM

UNCONTROLLED. Title: Drug and Alcohol Abuse Testing and Rehabilitation

Drug and Alcohol Testing for Bus Drivers

OMNIBUS TRANSPORTATION ACT- ALCOHOL AND CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES

DECISION LIMITS FOR THE CONFIRMATORY QUANTIFICATION OF THRESHOLD SUBSTANCES

1 March HUMAN RESOURCES Employee Drug Testing, Substance Abuse and Drug Free Workplace Policy POLICY Number: B-002

FOOD FOR THOUGHT Topical Insights from our Subject Matter Experts UNDERSTANDING WHAT IS NEEDED TO PRODUCE QUALITY DATA

M E M O R A N D U M. Austin Police Department Field Support Services Forensic Science Division

BEIPH Final Report. QCMD 2010 Hepatitis B Virus DNA (HBVDNA10A) EQA Programme. William G MacKay on behalf of QCMD and its Scientific Council July 2010

Richard Evers Laboratory Manager Synergy Health Laboratory Services. Do I need a Drug & Alcohol Policy? -

USING CLSI GUIDELINES TO PERFORM METHOD EVALUATION STUDIES IN YOUR LABORATORY

LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS RECEIPT OF DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE POLICY

Competency Assessment (both of employees and of the laboratory as a whole)

Description of the Forensic Science Major

STANDARD OPERATING GUIDELINES: EVIDENTIAL BREATH ALCOHOL INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION

LAB 37 Edition 3 June 2013

Drug and Alcohol Testing

Policies & Procedures

CHAPTER 7 QUALITY ASSESSMENT

IMPLEMENTATION SUGGESTIONS

Procedure for Writing Technical Procedures

Quality Control of the Future: Risk Management and Individual Quality Control Plans (IQCPs)

FEDERAL HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT

New York State Department of Health Clinical Laboratory Reference System. Guide to Program Requirements and Services

Cypress College Heath Science Division Psychiatric Technician Program

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS

Forensic Investigations Anthropology. Luis A. Sanchez, M.D. - Chief Medical Examiner

Asset Marketing Services, Inc. Drug and Alcohol Testing Policy (MN)

CATASAUQUA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

P407.7 DRUG AND ALCOHOL FREE WORKPLACE PROCEDURE

Forensic Toxicology Program: Alcohol and Drug Testing in Wisconsin Drivers

STILLWATER BILLINGS CLINIC. Job Description Medical Technologist

How To Become A State Pol Forensic Tech Leader

9. Quality Assurance 9.1 INTRODUCTION 9.2 FIELD SAMPLING QUALITY ASSURANCE 9.3 ANALYTICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE Internal Quality Control

Urine Specimen Dilution: Assessment and Policy Recommendations

Drug and Alcohol Testing for Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulated Employees

Laboratory Director Responsibilities

Scientific Working Group for Forensic Toxicology (SWGTOX) Standard Practices for Method Validation in Forensic Toxicology

FORENSIC BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES What can I do with this degree?

3.1. The procedure shall be applicable to all University employees.

EXECUTIVE ORDER State of Maryland Substance Abuse Policy

CITY OF ESSEXVILLE SUBSTANCE ABUSE POLICY

Transcription:

FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY LABORATORY OFFICE OF CHIEF MEDICAL EXAMINER CITY OF NEW YORK PROFICIENCY TESTING PRINCIPLE Laboratories may participate, by mandate or by choice, in external proficiency testing programs. Expected results for proficiency test specimens are unknown to anyone in the laboratory. The results are known only to the providing external agency and are revealed to the laboratory as a monitor of the laboratory s performance, as an aid for laboratory improvement and/or a condition of licensure. Proficiency testing programs also provide the opportunity to compare the laboratory performance with the mean and range of results obtained by other laboratories. Target values may be assigned by selected reference laboratories based on the weighed-in amounts or by a consensus of the participating laboratories. Programs of greatest value are those where the sample matrix and analytes are representative of the laboratory s stated mission. Effective January 1, 2010, all ABFT accredited laboratories are required to subscribe to both the FTC (Toxicology) and the T-series proficiency tests of the College of American Pathologists (CAP). Laboratories are required to complete all challenges for the FTC set for which the laboratory has established, validated methods. All of the laboratory s usual screening and confirmation tests need to be completed for the T-series, plus those quantitative challenges for which the laboratory has routine methods Results must be returned to CAP within the reporting period. In addition, laboratories must subscribe to the CAP AL1 Whole Blood Alcohol program or comparable program(s) with an equivalent number of challenges for ethanol and related volatiles. This laboratory currently participates in the following proficiency testing programs: Supplier/Sponsor Description Year Commenced Challenges CAT Proficiency Testing 1987 2/year CAP Whole blood alcohol 1988 3/year CAP Serum alcohol 1988 3/year CAP Urine Toxicology 1988 3/year (UT-series) CAP Toxicology (T-series) 1991 3/year CAP Forensic Toxicology - 2007 2/year Criminalistics (FTC series) New York State DOH Blood and urine alcohol 1993 1/year/analyst Page 1 of 7

STATE OF NEW YORK, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC ALCOHOL ANALYST CERTIFICATION All analysts are required to participate in the program. The performance standard of the program requires that results be within + 7.5% of the gravimetric assignment (g ethanol/ dl of whole blood) for concentrations equal to or greater than 0.10% or within + 0.008 g/dl of the gravimetric assignment (g ethanol/ dl of whole blood) for concentrations less then 0.10%. Four samples are provided to each analyst and at least three of these must meet the performance standard of the program. Analysts who meet the score of 75% or higher are issued the Blood and Urine Alcohol Analyst Permit by the State of New York, Department of Health. The permit is valid for a period of one year. Analysts who have been issued this permit are considered qualified to perform alcohol testing in areas of post mortem as well as human performance forensic toxicology. is required for all unsatisfactory results. is determined based on the type of error (i.e. analytical, transcription, procedural). An investigation of the analytical error(s) is required for scores less than 75%. will include, at a minimum, repeat analysis of samples under observation by a certified analyst. may also include preparation of new calibrators, preparation of new controls or a complete re-validation of the analytical procedure. A report of this investigation and corrective action taken is provided to NYS DOH which will then issue another set of four proficiency samples, whenever necessary. AACP/CAP WHOLE BLOOD ALCOHOL/ETHYLENE GLYCOL/VOLATILES SURVEY The American Association for Clinical Chemistry/College of American Pathologists (AACP/CAP) evaluates results based upon a range of acceptability. The range is determined using a target value and a limit. The target value is usually the mean of all methods and the range of acceptability is either + 20% of target or 0-9 mg/dl for ethanol free specimens. This laboratory considers the range of acceptability for volatiles to be + 10% of target or within + 1 SD of participant mean (0-9 mg/dl for ethanol free specimens). The range of acceptability for ethylene glycol is + 20% of target or within + 2 SD of participant mean. is required for all unsatisfactory results. is determined based Page 2 of 7

for analytical errors will include, at a minimum, repeat analysis of samples under observation by an analyst holding a Blood and Urine Alcohol Analyst Permit by the State of New York, Department of Health. may also include preparation of new calibrators, preparation of new controls, a complete re-validation of the analytical procedure, and repeat analysis of case work which may have been AACC/CAP SERUM ALCOHOL/ETHYLENE GLYCOL/VOLATILES SURVEY The American Association for Clinical Chemistry/College of American Pathologists (AACP/CAP) evaluates results based upon a range of acceptability. The range is determined using a target value and a limit. The target value is usually the mean of all methods and the range of acceptability is either + 20% of target or 0-9 mg/dl for ethanol free specimens. This laboratory considers the range of acceptability for volatile compounds to be + 10% of target or within + 1 SD of the participant mean (0-9 mg/dl for ethanol free specimens). The range of acceptability for ethylene glycol is + 20% of target or within + 2 SD of participant mean. is required for all unsatisfactory results. is determined based for analytical errors will include, at a minimum, repeat analysis of samples under observation by an analyst holding a Blood and Urine Alcohol Analyst Permit by the State of New York, Department of Health. may also include preparation of new calibrators, preparation of new controls, a complete re-validation of the analytical procedure, and repeat analysis of case work which may have been CAP URINE TOXICOLOGY SURVEY (UT SERIES) Only false positive results are considered unacceptable in the College of American Pathologists (CAP) UT series. Participants are marked incorrect if they report a drug present when it is not. They are not marked incorrect if they do not report a drug present. False positives are marked incorrect whereas false negatives are not marked incorrect. Quantitative results are not required. Page 3 of 7

is required for all false positive results. is determined based for analytical errors will include, at a minimum, repeat analysis of relevant samples, to exclude the possibility of a random error (e.g. sampling error). may also include preparation of new calibrators, preparation of new controls, a complete revalidation of the analytical procedure and repeat analysis of case work which may have been may be required for some false negative results. False negative results for screen or for analytes tested by special request only. However, if in-house methodology exists Page 4 of 7

CAP TOXICOLOGY SURVEY (T SERIES) Only false positive results are considered unacceptable in the College of American Pathologists (CAP) T series. Participants are marked incorrect if they report a drug present when it is not. They are not marked incorrect if they do not report a drug present. False positives are marked incorrect whereas false negatives are not marked incorrect. Acceptable performance for ethanol is the same as described under serum and whole blood CAP surveys. Acceptable performance for other analytes, where practical, is based on the following: at least 80% of the challenges should be within + 2 SD of participant mean or within + 20% of weighed-in target and remaining challenges should be within + 3 SD of participant mean or within + 30% of weighed in target. is required for all false positive results. is determined based for analytical errors will include, at a minimum, repeat analysis of relevant samples, to exclude the possibility of a random error (e.g. sampling error). may also include preparation of new calibrators, preparation of new controls, a complete revalidation of the analytical procedure, and repeat analysis of case work which may have been may be required for some false negative results. False negative results for screen or for analytes tested by special request only, however, if in-house methodology exists CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF TOXICOLOGISTS (CAT) PROFICIENCY TESTING The objective of the CAT biannual survey is to present analytical toxicologists with physiological samples containing drugs which in many cases will challenge the performance of conventional methodologies. The survey samples may contain drugs of abuse, volatiles, commonly prescribed drugs, as well as rarely prescribed drugs, designer drugs or drugs which are not available in the USA. Urine, whole blood or serum matrixes are utilized. The performance of three reference laboratories is used to establish a benchmark of performance. CAT does not set any specific criteria for acceptable performance. The acceptance criteria which follow apply for this laboratory. Acceptable performance for ethanol is same as described under serum and whole blood CAP surveys. Acceptable performance for other analytes, where practical, is based on the following: Page 5 of 7

at least 80% of the challenges should be within + 2 SD of participant mean or within + 20% of weighed-in target and remaining challenges should be within + 3 SD of participant mean or within + 30% of weighed in target. is required for all false positive results. is determined based for analytical errors will include, at a minimum, repeat analysis of relevant samples, to exclude the possibility of a random error (e.g., sampling error). may also include preparation of new calibrators, preparation of new controls, a complete revalidation of the analytical procedure, and repeat analysis of case work which may have been may be required for some false negative results. False negative results for screen or for analytes tested by special request only, however, if in-house methodology exists Results of proficiency tests are reviewed by the Laboratory Director and the QA/QC supervisor upon receipt of summaries from providers. Results are discussed with laboratory personnel during the regular weekly meetings. CAP FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY CRIMINALISTICS SURVEY (FTC Series) Only false positive results are considered unacceptable in the College of American Pathologists (CAP) FTC series. Participants are marked incorrect if they report a drug present when it is not. They are not marked incorrect if they do not report a drug present. False positives are marked incorrect whereas false negatives are not marked incorrect. Acceptable performance for ethanol is the same as described under serum and whole blood CAP surveys. Acceptable performance for other analytes, where practical, is based on the following: at least 80% of the challenges should be within + 2 SD of participant mean or within + 20% of weighed-in target and remaining challenges should be within + 3 SD of participant mean or within + 30% of weighed in target. is required for all false positive results. is determined based for analytical errors will include, at a minimum, repeat analysis of relevant samples, to exclude the possibility of a random error (e.g. sampling error). may also include preparation of new calibrators, preparation of new controls, a complete re- Page 6 of 7

validation of the analytical procedure, and repeat analysis of case work which may have been may be required for some false negative results. False negative results for screen or for analytes tested by special request only, however, if in-house methodology exists Please refer also to the Guidelines for Performing Corrective Action for Deviations in Proficiency Test Results distributed by the ABFT Accrediataion Committee, December 1, 2012. Page 7 of 7