Dunlap Community Unit School District 323



Similar documents
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System

Instructional Management Plan

SMART GOALS. Franklin Public Schools. Fall 2012

Committee On Public Secondary Schools. Standards for Accreditation

Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation

Self-Assessment Duval County School System. Level 3. Level 3. Level 3. Level 4

Ohio School Counselor Evaluation Model MAY 2016

2013 Marzano School Leader Evaluation Model Rubric

NORTH CAROLINA PROFESSIONAL SCHOOL SOCIAL WORK STANDARDS

ACS WASC Accreditation Status Determination Worksheet

Principal Appraisal Overview

Standard 1: Planning and Evaluation of a Data- Driven Counseling Program

Illinois Center for School Improvement Framework: Core Functions, Indicators, and Key Questions

Technical Review Coversheet

South Washington County Schools World s Best Workforce Summary Report

Technology Plan Components

Leader Keys Effectiveness System Implementation Handbook

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Social Workers

RUBRICS FOR ASSESSING MASTER S LEVEL SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION PORTFOLIO EVIDENCE CLUSTERS APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY. Student Name.

Response to Intervention: The Mississippi Experience

PERFORMANCE EXPECTATION 1: Vision, Mission, and Goals

MARZANO SCHOOL LEADERSHIP EVALUATION MODEL

Highly Qualified Teacher Component JUNE 2016

Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School Social Workers (Required)

How To Improve The Curriculum At Minnetonka School District

Hawaii Teacher Standards Board Teacher Leader Work Group Report

SMART Goals. Goals should be SMART - specific, measurable, agreed upon, realistic and time-based.

Defining Excellence in School Counseling DRAFT. Urban School Counseling Initiative

Sample Professional Learning Plan for Administrator

WV School Counseling Program Audit

Building an Effective District Technology Team

THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM, TABLE OF CONTENTS

08X540. School For Community Research and Learning 1980 Lafayette Avenue School Address: Bronx, NY 10473

Georgia Department of Education School Keys: Unlocking Excellence through the Georgia School Standards

School Levels of Support. By Dr. Kristine Harms

Principal has shared the school vision and goals with the staff. A process for developing a school vision and goals is not evident.

School Counselor Evaluation

Byram Hills Administrators Association / Superintendent Agreement Annual Professional Performance Review Compliance

NAAS - inacol Standards for Quality Online Programs

Hiawatha Academies School District #4170

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists Definition of an Effective School Psychologist

1. The teacher candidate sets learning targets that address the Essential Academic Learning Requirements and the state learning goals.

Performance Evaluation System Protocol. Licensed Executive Professionals

Teacher Evaluation. Missouri s Educator Evaluation System

What are the purposes of competency-based/standards-based grading?

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Counselors

James Rumsey Technical Institute Employee Performance and Effectiveness Evaluation Procedure

Local Assistance Plan Schools: The Diagnostic Self-Review Document and Report Template

TENNESSEE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

NORTH CAROLINA PROFESSIONAL SCHOOL SOCIAL WORK STANDARDS

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Occupational Therapists

Financial Services FINANCIAL SERVICES UTILITIES 57 FINANCIAL SERVICES AND UTILITIES BUSINESS PLAN. CR_2215 Attachment 1

Elementary and Middle School Technology Curriculum Guidelines

Gwinnett County Public Schools, Ga.

Principles to Actions

A Guide to Curriculum Development: Purposes, Practices, Procedures

Grant Assistance Toolkit How to Write a Competitive Grant Featuring Scholastic s READ 180 and Scholastic Red

Request for Proposals Evaluation Guide

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Nurses

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Professional Development Self- Assessment Guidebook

Are your schools getting the most out of what technology has to offer?

Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System FAQ

Section Three: Ohio Standards for Principals

Teacher Appraisal. Houston Independent School District

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Speech-Language Pathologists

Update on MMSD Bilingual Education Plan Development

Michigan Department of Education Educational Technology Plan Suggestions for Enhancing Your Technology Plan

District 2854 Ada-Borup Public Schools. Reading Well By Third Grade Plan. For. Ada-Borup Public Schools. Drafted April 2012

Best Practices in School Budgeting

TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University

Illinois State Board of Education

Georgia District Performance Standards

Boulder Valley School District Effective Specialized Service Professionals Standards Social Workers and Psychologists

DISTRICT: Date Submitted to DOE: Contact Person s Name Title. Phone # E mail:

WV School Counseling Program Audit

Evaluation of School Psychologists

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School counselors

DRAFT For use in validation process only Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School counselors

K-12 EDUCATION Introduction and Capabilities K-12 Education

TEACHNJ ACT. New Evaluation Implementation School Year Required by State of NJ

Frequently Asked Questions Contact us:

PROGRAM FOR LICENSING ASSESSMENTS FOR COLORADO EDUCATORS (PLACE )

Topic #4: Goals, Objectives, Outcomes, Progress, and Action Plans Program Examples

Summary of the Assessment Plan for the Educational Leadership and Administration Program

North Carolina TEACHER. evaluation process. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction

Mississippi Counselor Appraisal Rubric M-CAR

Professional School Counselor Effectiveness Rubric 2012

Eugene School District 4J Professional School Counselor Rubric

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Social Workers

Walpole Public Schools Leadership Council Goals Date: 7/1/ Plan # 8

Members of the Alabama State Board of Education. Governor Bob Riley President of the State Board of Education. District

Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Principals

Board of Cooperative Educational Services Rensselaer-Columbia-Greene Counties Annual Professional Performance Review

Domain 1: Strategic/Cultural Leadership

Standards for Advanced Programs in Educational Leadership

New Jersey School Counselor Association Evaluation Model. The Road to Highly Effective School Counselors

Effective Early Literacy Support in Philadelphia Promoting Early Literacy Inside and Outside of the Classroom

EDUCATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT PLAN

Transcription:

Dunlap Community Unit School District 323 Strategic Plan Goal Goal Area: Technology Goal Champion: Lisa Parker 1.) State the SMART goal (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Results-oriented, Target date). During the 2010-2011 school year, the Assistant Superintendent will facilitate a Data Warehousing Stakeholder Committee to implement a data warehousing system in the Dunlap School District. This goal will be measured through quarterly updates and a year-end report to the Board of Education regarding the progress of the action plan. 2.) Describe data sources consulted and a summary analysis of the data that indicate the need for the goal. As the District strives to carry out its core emphasis of data driven decision making, there is not a comprehensive data warehouse system in place that allows easy access to data. How a district collects, manages, and reports its data can mean the difference between successful analysis and misguided intentions. 3.) Identify the correlation of the stated school improvement goal to the District strategic plan. Check all that apply: GOAL 1: To Continuously Improve Student Growth and Achievement GOAL 2: To Obtain a Satisfying and Productive Classroom and School Learning Environment GOAL 3: To Achieve a Satisfying and Productive Classroom and School Teaching Environment GOAL 4: To Ensure a Satisfying and Productive Partnership with Families and the Community GOAL 5: To Obtain Efficient, Effective, and Equitable Use of Resources 4.) Summarize how this goal will be measured. What will be the evidence of goal attainment? This goal will be measured by the implementation of data warehousing. The presentation of a detailed action plan to implement a data warehousing system in the Dunlap School District that includes the following components: 1) A description of the research-based strategies and actions: 2) Inclusion of measures, targets, and expected results; 3) Listings of persons impacted; 4) Identification of resources required; and 5) Creating of timelines for completion.

Strategic Plan - Action Plan SMART Goal: During the 2011-2012 school year, the Assistant Superintendent will present an action plan to the Board of Education that will provide details of the plan to implement a data warehousing system in the Dunlap School District. The action plan will include components such as: A description of the research-based strategies and actions, in-process measures, targets, expected results, persons impacted, resources required, and timelines for completion. Description of Proposed Action/Activity (What is going to be done to address this goal?) Research/Rationale For Activity (Explain how best practices and research justify this activity) Results (What will be the evidence of completion of the activity?) Resources (Funding Source & Cost) Timeline (When will the activity occur?) Initiate a Data Warehousing System Committee to study and plan for the implementation of a data warehousing system. Define data warehouse and identify best practice. Review literature on effective data warehouse systems. Establish clear outcomes, process and timelines for group focus and tasks. Data driven decision making is one of the District s indicators of success. The district does not currently have a data warehouse solution. The creation of a Data Warehouse Planning Committee $1500 November 2010 Determine what data the District currently collects. Gather information related to current data being collected from all departments. Evaluate existing databases and identify what information is maintained. It is important to Define the System prior to making a decision. This step is intended to define what data the District currently collects. A report displaying all of the data currently collected by department. February 2011 Determine what data we are not currently collecting, but would like to collect. Ask database users to list data they would like to collect, but are currently not doing so. Determine if existing data systems can collect the desired data. This step will serve as the gap analysis. The District will determine what data should be collected for consideration within the data warehouse solution. The complete evaluation of current data systems and a list of data points that would be desirable to collect. June, 2011

Determine if current databases need to be replaced. Evaluate stability/efficiency of existing data systems. Eliminate legacy systems. Currently, some data systems are no longer being supported or they are outdated beyond functionality. This step will help weed-out ineffective database systems in use. Elimination of nonfunctional data systems. Costs will vary depending on findings. October, 2012 Evaluate software publisher s data warehousing system. Benchmark best practice. Conduct site visits to other school districts that have implemented data warehousing systems. Review potential data warehouse products on the market that could meet determined data needs. products designed to meet the data warehousing needs of the District will be conducted to determine the best fit for Dunlap CUSD #323. All options will be explored and site visits will be made to get first- hand experience products designed to meet the data warehousing needs of the District will be conducted $1200 2011-2012 school year Assess complete data warehousing systems and associated costs and select solution. Create a rubric that outlines desired capabilities of data warehouse systems. Create an RFP for data warehouse solution and score received RFPs against the rubric. Evaluate vendor products (live demonstrations) to select data warehouse product- use rubric for evaluation of products. Select data warehouse solution to implement. In order to select a final product/vendor, a rubric will be created that clearly states the desired criteria of data warehouse systems that are being considered. products designed to meet the data warehousing needs of the District will be conducted. 2011-2012 school year Create a plan for implementation of data warehouse system. Create a project timeline for implementation of data warehouse solution (activity, persons impacted, timeline, cost, etc.). A well crafted, comprehensive implementation plan will help ensure a smooth execution of the data warehouse solution. A well crafted, comprehensive implementation plan will be created. March, 2012

Create a plan for training how to use data warehouse system. Presentation to the Dunlap Board of Education. A plan will be presented to the Board of Education for their approval. A comprehensive plan will be approved by the Board of Education. May, 2012 Implement the data warehouse solution according to the implementation plan. Once a plan has been created, it will be implemented. The implementation of a data warehouse solution in the Dunlap School District. $ Varies depending on solution selected. September, 2012

STRATEGIC PLAN STRATEGIES (Check all strategies that apply to this goal and action plan) Teacher teams will develop and align common assessments with State and national standards and provide feedback to each student and parent. Leadership teams will set and communicate direction which aligns the work of each school improvement plan to the District Strategic Plan. Interventions and enrichments will align with state and national standards to provide progress monitoring to ensure the needs of all students are met. Students will be responsible for tracking and monitoring their learning progress, collecting evidence of their success, and setting goals to accomplish future learning. A data management system will be implemented to allow for all essential data to be collected, accessed, analyzed, reported, and acted upon. District, school, grade level and department teams will have adequate time, tools, strategies, training, and resources to communicate, collaborate and monitor progress. Communication and collaboration with parents and the community will ensure engagement and satisfaction. Long-range financial decisions will balance the needs of a high quality educational program for students with the financial ability of the community to provide adequate resources. Long-range K-12 facilities/space decisions will balance the needs of a safe, secure, nurturing learning/teaching environment with the community s financial ability to provide adequate resources.