Georgia District Performance Standards
|
|
|
- Milo May
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2 Vision and Mission: Purpose and direction for continuous improvement with a commitment to high expectations for learning and teaching VM 1: Creates and communicates a collaboratively-developed district vision, mission, and core beliefs that focus on preparing all students for college and career readiness VM 2: Fosters, within the district and broader community, a culture of trust, collaboration, and joint responsibility for improving learning and teaching Governance: Policies and procedures that support a shared vision by all stakeholders and promote high expectations for learning and teaching in all schools G 1: Builds support for district and school goals and initiatives by engaging stakeholders, including school board members, to improve learning and teaching G 2: Uses an established process to align policies, procedures, and practices with laws and regulations G 3: Communicates district policies and procedures in a timely manner to relevant audiences G 4: Grants defined flexibility, based on results, to school leaders to address individual school needs to improve learning and teaching Planning, Organizing, and Monitoring: The data-driven processes, procedures, structures, and products that focus the operations of the district to ensure higher levels of student learning and staff effectiveness POM 1: Uses a collaborative, data-driven planning process at the district and school levels for improving student learning POM 2: Uses protocols and processes for problem solving, decision-making, and removing barriers POM 3: Uses processes to monitor and provide timely guidance, support, and feedback to individual schools as they implement improvement plans and initiatives Allocation and Management of Resources: The allotment and administration of resources to attain district and school goals for student learning AMR 1: Administers a clearly defined, collaborative, data-driven budget process that ensures the equitable, efficient, and transparent distribution of resources to support learning and teaching AMR 2: Allocates and monitors the use of time, materials, equipment, and fiscal resources to support learning and teaching AMR 3: Develops and implements processes to maintain facilities and equipment to ensure an environment, which is safe and conducive to learning AMR 4: Provides, coordinates, and monitors student support systems and services February 12, 2015 Page 2 of 37
3 Learning and Teaching: District processes for implementing, supporting, and monitoring curriculum, instruction, and assessment systems and their impact on student learning LT 1: Engages and supports all schools in systematic processes for curriculum design to align instruction and assessments with the required standards LT 2: Develops and communicates common expectations for implementing curriculum, instruction, and assessment practices across all schools LT 3: Guides, supports, and evaluates the implementation of curriculum, instruction, and assessments LT 4: Ensures that professional learning is relevant and addresses adult and student needs LT 5: Assesses the impact of professional learning on staff practices and student learning and makes adjustments as needed LT 6: Guides and supports schools in the selection and implementation of effective strategies, programs, and interventions to improve student learning Leader, Teacher, and Staff Effectiveness: The performance management system that maximizes the effectiveness of district leaders, teachers, and other staff to ensure optimal learning for all students LTSE 1: Develops and implements processes that recruit, hire, and retain highly effective teachers, leaders, and staff LTSE 2: Establishes and implements processes that increase the effectiveness of teachers, leaders, and staff LTSE 3: Guides and monitors the use of a state-approved evaluation system to ensure fidelity of implementation and to evaluate accurately the effectiveness of district and school leaders, teachers, and staff LTSE 4: Defines the roles, responsibilities, skill sets, and expectations of leaders at all levels of the district to improve student learning and staff performance LTSE 5: Organizes and provides personnel, expertise, and services to achieve district and individual school goals Family and Community Engagement: Processes for engaging families and community members as active participants to help schools improve learning and teaching FCE 1: Establishes and communicates district-wide expectations for schools to engage families and the community to support learning and teaching FCE 2: Establishes structures which promote clear and open communication between schools and stakeholders FCE 3: Ensures that families and community members have feedback and problem-solving opportunities throughout the district February 12, 2015 Page 3 of 37
4 Vision and Mission Purpose and direction for continuous improvement with a commitment to high expectations for learning and teaching February 12, 2015 Page 4 of 37
5 Vision and Mission Standard 1: Creates and communicates a collaboratively-developed district vision, mission, and core beliefs that focus on preparing all students for college and career readiness The collaborativelydeveloped vision, mission, and core beliefs that emphasize preparing all students for college and career readiness are continuously and clearly communicated to all stakeholders and are pervasive in the culture and daily actions of the district. The collaborativelydeveloped vision, mission, and core beliefs that emphasize preparing all students for college and career readiness have been created and communicated to stakeholders and are evident in most actions across the district. The vision, mission, and core beliefs have been developed with some emphasis on preparing students for college and career readiness, but may have weaknesses due to insufficient collaboration with stakeholders, poor communication, or other limitations. The vision, mission, and core beliefs may not exist or may not focus on preparing students for college and career readiness. February 12, 2015 Page 5 of 37
6 Vision and Mission Standard 2: Fosters, within the district and broader community, a culture of trust, collaboration, and joint responsibility for improving learning and teaching The actions of the district are well established and have created a strong culture of trust, collaboration, and shared responsibility for improving learning and teaching within the district and in the broader community. Processes and procedures are pervasive in the district and schools to support the district s vision and mission. The actions of the district effectively foster a culture of trust, collaboration, and shared responsibility for improving learning and teaching within the district and broader community. Processes and procedures are implemented to support the district s vision and mission. The actions of the district are inconsistent in fostering a culture of trust, collaboration, and shared responsibility for improving learning and teaching. Some effective processes and procedures are used to support the district s vision and mission. The actions of the district do not foster a culture of trust, collaboration, and shared responsibility for improving learning and teaching. Few, if any, effective processes and procedures are used to support the district s vision and mission. February 12, 2015 Page 6 of 37
7 Governance Policies and procedures that support a shared vision by all stakeholders and promote high expectations for learning and teaching in all schools February 12, 2015 Page 7 of 37
8 Governance Standard 1: Builds support for district and school goals and initiatives by engaging stakeholders, including school board members, to improve learning and teaching Stakeholders, including school board members, take leadership roles in advancing district and school goals and initiatives that improve learning and teaching. The district consistently engages stakeholders, including school board members, in supporting district and school goals and initiatives that improve learning and teaching. The district provides some opportunities for a range of stakeholders to be engaged in supporting goals and initiatives that will improve learning and teaching. Engagement of stakeholders is limited or nonexistent, or the engagement occurs with issues that do not impact learning and teaching. February 12, 2015 Page 8 of 37
9 Governance Standard 2: Uses an established process to align policies, procedures, and practices with laws and regulations A systematic and collaborative process is used for ongoing development, revision, and alignment of policies, procedures, and practices with laws and regulations. The district regularly uses an established process to align policies, procedures, and practices with laws and regulations. A process to align policies, procedures, and practices with laws and regulations is not comprehensive or is not used on a regular basis. A process is not in use to align policies, procedures, and practices with laws and regulations. February 12, 2015 Page 9 of 37
10 Governance Standard 3: Communicates district policies and procedures in a timely manner to relevant audiences Strategic, comprehensive processes and protocols are in place for clearly and continuously communicating policies and procedures in a timely manner to all stakeholders. The district consistently communicates policies and procedures in a timely manner to relevant audiences. Communication of policies and procedures to relevant audiences is sometimes inadequate or inconsistent. Communication of district policies and procedures to relevant audiences is very limited or ineffective. February 12, 2015 Page 10 of 37
11 Governance Standard 4: Grants defined flexibility, based on results, to school leaders to address individual school needs to improve learning and teaching Flexibility granted to school leaders, based upon sustained high performance, is well defined, reviewed periodically, and fully supports the improvement of learning and teaching. The district grants defined flexibility, based on results, to school leaders to address individual school needs to improve learning and teaching. The district grants limited flexibility, or the flexibility that is given does not allow leaders to improve learning and teaching sufficiently. The district grants little or no flexibility or inappropriate flexibility to school leaders to improve learning and teaching. February 12, 2015 Page 11 of 37
12 Planning, Organizing, and Monitoring The data-driven processes, procedures, structures, and products that focus the operations of the district to ensure higher levels of student learning and staff effectiveness February 12, 2015 Page 12 of 37
13 Planning, Organizing, and Monitoring Standard 1: Uses a collaborative, data-driven planning process at the district and school levels for improving student learning A collaborative, data-driven planning process results in aligned, comprehensive plans at the district and school levels for improving student learning. At the district and school levels, staffs engage in a collaborative, data-driven planning process to improve student learning. At the district and school levels, staffs engage in a planning process to improve student learning, but limitations exist with data analysis, collaboration, or other issues. A collaborative, data-driven planning process for improving student learning is not in place at the district or school levels. February 12, 2015 Page 13 of 37
14 Planning, Organizing, and Monitoring Standard 2: Uses protocols and processes for problem solving, decision-making, and removing barriers The district uses and reviews established protocols and processes for problem solving, decision-making, and removing barriers on a regular basis. Contingency plans are developed for unlikely occurrences. The district uses protocols and processes for problem solving, decision-making, and removing barriers. District use of protocols and processes for problem solving, decision-making, or removing barriers is limited or inconsistent. The district does not use protocols or processes for problem solving, decision- making or removing barriers. February 12, 2015 Page 14 of 37
15 Planning, Organizing, and Monitoring Standard 3: Uses processes to monitor and provide timely guidance, support, and feedback to individual schools as they implement improvement plans and initiatives The district has ongoing, comprehensive processes in place to monitor and provide guidance, support and feedback to individual schools as they implement improvement plans, programs or initiatives. The district builds the capacity of school level staff to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of improvement plans, programs, and initiatives. The district uses processes to monitor and provide timely guidance, support, and feedback to individual schools as they implement improvement plans and initiatives. The district has some limited processes in place to monitor and provide guidance, support, and feedback to schools as they implement improvement plans and initiatives. The district does not use structured processes for monitoring or providing guidance, support, or feedback to individual schools as they implement improvement plans or initiatives. February 12, 2015 Page 15 of 37
16 Allocation and Management of Resources The allotment and administration of resources to attain district and school goals for student learning February 12, 2015 Page 16 of 37
17 Allocation and Management of Resources Standard 1: Administers a clearly defined, collaborative, datadriven budget process that ensures the equitable, efficient, and transparent distribution of resources to support learning and teaching The well-established budget process allows input from departments and programs and is driven by the needs of the schools and district. Various funding sources are efficiently maximized at the district and school levels. The budget process is clearly defined, collaborative, and data-driven, resulting in the equitable, efficient, and transparent distribution of resources to support learning and teaching. A budget process is in place, but it does not consistently include collaborative, datadriven decisions. In some instances, resource distribution in the district lacks efficiency, equity, or transparency. Across the district, individual departments and programs develop budgets in isolation resulting in gaps, duplication, or poor cost effectiveness. District staff serve primarily as controllers of funds and provide little or no assistance to schools on the funding of plans. February 12, 2015 Page 17 of 37
18 Allocation and Management of Resources Standard 2: Allocates and monitors the use of time, materials, equipment, and fiscal resources to support learning and teaching The district allocates and continually monitors the use of time, materials, equipment, and fiscal resources to address both immediate and long-term goals to ensure resources are maximized to support learning and teaching. The district allocates and regularly monitors the effective use of time, materials, equipment, and fiscal resources to ensure that they are utilized to support learning and teaching. The district inconsistently allocates and monitors the use of time, materials, equipment, and fiscal resources to support learning and teaching. The district does little to allocate or monitor effectively the use of time, materials, equipment, or fiscal resources to support learning and teaching. February 12, 2015 Page 18 of 37
19 Allocation and Management of Resources Standard 3: Develops and implements processes to maintain facilities and equipment to ensure an environment which is safe and conducive to learning The district has a comprehensive schedule for ongoing, proactive maintenance of facilities and equipment. Repairs and services are provided in a timely manner and do not disrupt the learning environment. The district develops and implements effective processes to maintain facilities and equipment to ensure an environment which is safe and conducive to learning. Irregular or insufficient processes are in place to maintain facilities and equipment to ensure an environment which is safe and conducive to learning. The district has done little to develop or implement processes to maintain facilities and equipment to ensure an environment which is safe and conducive to learning. February 12, 2015 Page 19 of 37
20 Allocation and Management of Resources Standard 4: Provides, coordinates, and monitors student support systems and services The district provides, coordinates, and systematically monitors a comprehensive, accessible array of services to meet the educational, physical, social and emotional needs of its students. The district provides, coordinates, and monitors student support systems and services. The district provides some student services, but improvements are needed in some areas such as program coordination and monitoring. The district has systemic problems with providing, coordinating, or monitoring student support systems or services. February 12, 2015 Page 20 of 37
21 Learning and Teaching District processes for implementing, supporting, and monitoring curriculum, instruction, and assessment systems and their impact on student learning February 12, 2015 Page 21 of 37
22 Learning and Teaching 1: Engages and supports all schools in systematic processes for curriculum design to align instruction and assessments with the required standards The district continuously engages and supports all schools in systematic processes for curriculum design to align instruction and assessment with the required standards. District staff work to build the capacity of school staff to lead curriculum design efforts. The district engages and supports all schools in systematic processes for curriculum design to align instruction and assessments with the required standards. The district processes for engaging and supporting schools in curriculum design is incomplete in some content areas or limited in other ways. District schools are left to work in isolation on curriculum design without district processes or support. February 12, 2015 Page 22 of 37
23 Learning and Teaching 2: Develops and communicates common expectations for implementing curriculum, instruction, and assessment practices across all schools A clear understanding of common expectations fosters a culture of results-based practices in curriculum, instruction, and assessment throughout the district with appropriate flexibility for schools to address specific needs as they arise. The district develops and communicates common expectations for implementing curriculum, instruction, and assessment practices across all schools. The district expectations for implementing curriculum, instruction, or assessment practices are not fully developed or are not clearly communicated to all schools. The district has not developed or communicated expectations for implementing curriculum, instruction, or assessment practices. February 12, 2015 Page 23 of 37
24 Learning and Teaching 3: Guides, supports, and evaluates the implementation of curriculum, instruction, and assessments The district provides a collaborative and systematic approach for guiding, supporting and evaluating the implementation of curriculum, instruction, and assessments. District staff build the capacity of school level staff to evaluate the implementation of curriculum, instruction, and assessments. The district effectively guides, supports, and evaluates the implementation of curriculum, instruction, and assessments. The district provides limited guidance and support for evaluating the implementation of curriculum, instruction, and assessments. The district does not take an effective role in guiding, supporting, or evaluating the implementation of curriculum, instruction, or assessments. February 12, 2015 Page 24 of 37
25 Learning and Teaching 4: Ensures that professional learning is relevant and addresses adult and student needs The district fosters a culture of systematic, quality, and relevant professional learning that consistently addresses the needs of its adults and its students. The district ensures that professional learning at the school and district levels is relevant and addresses adult and student needs. The professional learning at the school and district levels is not consistently relevant or is not consistently linked to adult or student needs. The professional learning at the school and district levels is not relevant and does not address adult or student needs. February 12, 2015 Page 25 of 37
26 Learning and Teaching 5: Assesses the impact of professional learning on staff practices and student learning and makes adjustments as needed The impact of professional learning on staff practices and student learning is systematically monitored at the district and school levels by examining performance data throughout the year and timely, appropriate adjustments are made as needed. The impact of professional learning on staff practices and student learning is assessed and adjustments are made as needed. The impact of professional learning on staff practices or student learning is assessed on a limited or inconsistent basis, or appropriate adjustments are not always made. The impact of professional learning on staff practices or student learning is not assessed by district or school staff. February 12, 2015 Page 26 of 37
27 Learning and Teaching 6: Guides and supports schools in the selection and implementation of effective strategies, programs, and interventions to improve student learning The district systematically provides guidance and ongoing support to schools in the selection and implementation of effective strategies, programs, and interventions to improve student learning. The district guides and supports schools in the selection and implementation of effective strategies, programs, and interventions to improve student learning. The district provides some limited guidance and support in the selection or implementation of effective strategies, programs, and interventions to improve student learning. The district provides little or no support or guidance in the selection or implementation of effective strategies, programs, and interventions. The district may require or allow some inappropriate strategies, programs, or interventions. February 12, 2015 Page 27 of 37
28 Leader, Teacher, and Staff Effectiveness The performance management system that maximizes the effectiveness of district leaders, teachers, and other staff to ensure optimal learning for all students February 12, 2015 Page 28 of 37
29 Leader, Teacher, and Staff Effectiveness Standard 1: Develops and implements processes that recruit, hire, and retain highly effective leaders, teachers, and other staff Proactive processes are in place throughout the district to recruit, hire, and retain highly effective staff and continuously to address the district and school level personnel needs due to anticipated attrition, growth, or reorganization. The district develops and implements processes that recruit, hire, and retain effective leaders, teachers, and other staff. The district has not sufficiently developed or fully implemented processes to recruit, hire, and retain effective leaders, teachers, or other staff. Processes are not in place to recruit, hire, and retain effective leaders, teachers, and other staff, or existing processes have been poorly implemented. February 12, 2015 Page 29 of 37
30 Leader, Teacher, and Staff Effectiveness Standard 2: Establishes and implements processes that increase the effectiveness of teachers, leaders, and staff Comprehensive data-driven processes that increase the effectiveness of leaders, teachers, and other staff are pervasive in the district and result in a culture of measureable, continuous improvement. Processes that increase the effectiveness of leaders, teachers, and staff have been established and consistently implemented throughout the district. Processes that increase the effectiveness of leaders, teachers, and staff are not fully developed or are implemented unevenly or inconsistently across the district. Few, if any, processes to increase the effectiveness of leaders, teachers, and staff have been developed or successfully implemented in the district. February 12, 2015 Page 30 of 37
31 Leader, Teacher, and Staff Effectiveness Standard 3: Guides and monitors the use of a state-approved evaluation system to ensure fidelity of implementation and to evaluate accurately the effectiveness of district and school leaders, teachers, and staff The district collects and analyzes comprehensive data from the state-approved evaluation system to inform staff retention, salaries, and professional learning throughout the district. The district guides and monitors a state-approved evaluation system to ensure fidelity of implementation and to evaluate accurately the effectiveness of district and school leaders, teachers, and staff. The district offers some guidance for the implementation of a stateapproved evaluation system, but some parts of the system are not implemented with fidelity or could benefit from more support or monitoring. The district does little to guide or monitor the implementation of a state-approved evaluation system. February 12, 2015 Page 31 of 37
32 Leader, Teacher, and Staff Effectiveness Standard 4: Defines the roles, responsibilities, skills sets, and expectations of leaders at all levels of the district to improve student learning and staff performance Actions of leaders throughout the district reflect a deep understanding of their leadership roles, responsibilities, and expectations. Leaders demonstrate the appropriate skills sets necessary to improve student learning and staff performance. The district defines the roles, responsibilities, skills sets, and expectations of leaders at all levels to increase student learning and staff performance. The general roles, responsibilities, skill sets, or expectations for leaders are not fully developed by the district. Leader roles, responsibilities, skill sets, and expectations are not defined or are not up-to-date at the school or district levels. February 12, 2015 Page 32 of 37
33 Leader, Teacher, and Staff Effectiveness Standard 5: Organizes and provides personnel, expertise, and services to achieve district and individual school goals The organization and strategic allocation of personnel, expertise, and services lead to the achievement of district and individual school goals. The district is focused on building the capacity and expertise of school and district staff to solve problems and perform at high levels. The organization and allocation of personnel, expertise, and services are sufficient to achieve district and individual school goals. The organization or allocation of personnel, expertise, and services is provided intermittently or on a shortterm basis as a solution for immediate, pressing needs. The organization or allocation of personnel, expertise, and services does not effectively support the needs of the district and schools. February 12, 2015 Page 33 of 37
34 Family and Community Engagement Processes for engaging families and community members as active participants to help schools improve learning and teaching February 12, 2015 Page 34 of 37
35 Family and Community Engagement Standard 1: Establishes and communicates district-wide expectations for schools to engage families and the community to support learning and teaching Expectations for family and community engagement are embedded in the culture and result in family and community members being active supporters of student learning and teaching throughout the district. Expectations for schools to engage families and the community to support learning and teaching are established and communicated throughout the district. Expectations for family and community engagement are inconsistent, varying from school to school, or are unevenly communicated across the district. Expectations for family and community engagement have not been established across the district. February 12, 2015 Page 35 of 37
36 Family and Community Engagement Standard 2: Establishes structures which promote clear and open communication between schools and stakeholders The district implements and continuously monitors structures for reliable, ongoing, and interactive communication between the schools and stakeholders. Structures which promote clear and open communication between schools and stakeholders have been effectively established. The district structures between schools and stakeholders result in communication that sometimes may not be consistent, clear, or timely. Structures which promote clear and open communication between schools and stakeholders have not been effectively established or implemented. February 12, 2015 Page 36 of 37
37 Family and Community Engagement Standard 3: Ensures that families and community members have feedback and problem-solving opportunities throughout the district The district engages family and community members to take leadership roles in feedback and problemsolving activities throughout the district. The district ensures that family and community members routinely have feedback and problem-solving opportunities throughout the district. Opportunities for family and community members to be involved in feedback and problem-solving are limited or inconsistently provided across the district. Opportunities for family and community feedback and involvement in problem-solving seldom occur in the district. February 12, 2015 Page 37 of 37
Georgia Department of Education School Keys: Unlocking Excellence through the Georgia School Standards
April 17, 2013 Page 2 of 77 Table of Contents Introduction... 5 School Keys History...5 School Keys Structure...6 School Keys Uses...7 GaDOE Contacts...8 Curriculum Planning Strand... 9 Assessment Strand...
Illinois Center for School Improvement Framework: Core Functions, Indicators, and Key Questions
Framework: Core Functions, Indicators, and Key Questions The Core Functions and Indicators, which form the structure for the delivery and execution of (Illinois CSI) services, describe the big ideas or
Delaware Performance Appraisal System
Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators DPAS-II Guide for Administrators (Principals) Principal Practice Rubric Updated July 2015 1 INEFFECTIVE A. DEVELOPS
Superintendent Effectiveness Rubric*
Public Document 3 Purpose: Outlines the standards that are the foundation for the evaluation. Name of Superintendent: Date: Performance Rating Scale: Distinguished (4) Accomplished (3) standards for most
Framework for Leadership
Framework for Leadership Date Leader Self-Assessment Evaluator Assessment Domain 1: Strategic/Cultural Leadership Principals/school leaders systemically and collaboratively develop a positive culture to
Section Three: Ohio Standards for Principals
Section Three: Ohio Standards for Principals 1 Principals help create a shared vision and clear goals for their schools and ensure continuous progress toward achieving the goals. Principals lead the process
Alabama Standards for Instructional Leaders
Alabama Standards for Instructional Leaders To realize the mission of enhancing school leadership among principals and administrators in Alabama resulting in improved academic achievement for all students,
PERFORMANCE EXPECTATION 1: Vision, Mission, and Goals
PERFORMANCE EXPECTATION 1: Vision, Mission, and Goals PERFORMANCE EXPECTATION 1: Vision, Mission, and Goals Education leaders ensure the achievement of all students by guiding the development and implementation
Utah Educational Leadership Standards, Performance Expectations and Indicators
Utah Educational Leadership Standards, Performance Expectations and Indicators Standard 1: Visionary Leadership An educational leader promotes the success of every student by facilitating the development,
Dimensions and Functions for School Leaders
Dispositions, Dimensions, and Functions for School Leaders Preparation and Support for the Next Generation of Kentucky s School and District Leaders Kentucky Cohesive Leadership System Continuum for Principal
Crosswalk of the New Colorado Principal Standards (proposed by State Council on Educator Effectiveness) with the
Crosswalk of the New Colorado Principal Standards (proposed by State Council on Educator Effectiveness) with the Equivalent in the Performance Based Principal Licensure Standards (current principal standards)
Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists Definition of an Effective School Psychologist
Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists Definition of an Effective School Psychologist Effective school psychologists are vital members of the education
The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support
The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Chapter 1: Massachusetts Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Overview Massachusetts has developed a blueprint outlining a single system of supports that is responsive
RUBRICS FOR ASSESSING MASTER S LEVEL SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION PORTFOLIO EVIDENCE CLUSTERS APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY. Student Name.
RUBRICS FOR ASSESSING MASTER S LEVEL SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION PORTFOLIO EVIDENCE CLUSTERS APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY Student Name Cohort Date This student matriculated through the following program MSA
Self-Assessment Duval County School System. Level 3. Level 3. Level 3. Level 4
Standard 1: Purpose and Direction 1.1 The system engages in a systematic, inclusive, and comprehensive process to review, revise, and communicate a system-wide propose for the student success. The system
Masters Comprehensive Exam and Rubric (Rev. July 17, 2014)
1 Educational Leadership & Policy Studies Masters Comprehensive Exam and Rubric (Rev. July 17, 2014) The comprehensive exam is intended as a final assessment of a student s ability to integrate important
Standard 1 INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: SPED Coordinator is a World Class instructional leader.
Special Education Coordinator Leadership Effectiveness through Analysis & Data HE: School Teams and special education staff are successful in making it happen. (Teams/SPED Staff catch fish on own) E: The
Education Leadership (ISLLC) Standards Comparison of Old (2007) and New Standards (2015)
Education Leadership (ISLLC) Standards Comparison of Old (2007) and New Standards (2015) 2007 Standards 2015 Standards Standard 1: Vision and Mission Standard 1: Vision and Mission An education leader
NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS
NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS ASSESSMENT DESIGN AND FRAMEWORK March 2014 Authorized for Distribution by the New York State Education Department NYSTCE, New York State Teacher Certification
Principal has shared the school vision and goals with the staff. A process for developing a school vision and goals is not evident.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Ohio Principal Performance Rating Rubric Principal Performance Rubric The Principal Performance Rating Rubric is intended to be scored holistically. This means that evaluators
Oak Park School District. Administrator Evaluation Program
Oak Park School District Administrator Evaluation Program Table of Contents Evaluation Purpose...1 Evaluation Timeline...2 Rubric for Instructional Administrator Standard 1...3 Standard 2...5 Standard
The school principal practices effective cultural leadership when he or she
Strategic Leadership Summary: School leadership creates conditions that result in the strategic re-imaging of the school s vision, mission, and goals in the 21 st Century. The leader exhibits the understanding
Eugene School District 4J Professional School Counselor Rubric
Eugene School District 4J Professional School Counselor Rubric Using leadership, collaboration and advocacy, the Professional School Counselor plans, delivers, manages and promotes a comprehensive guidance
ALIGNING DANIELSON FRAMEWORK WITH ASCA s SCHOOL COUNSELOR COMPETENCIES AND ETHICAL STANDARDS
1a: Demonstrating knowledge of counseling theory and techniques 1b: Demonstrating knowledge of child and adolescent behavior 1c: Establishing goals for the counseling program appropriate to the setting
CALIFORNIA PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE CREDENTIAL EXAMINATION (CPACE)
Education Code section 44270.5 allows an examination alternative to the Administrative Services preparation program as long as the examination is aligned with the current Administrative Services Program
EVALUATION RUBRICS FOR COUNSELORS
EVALUATION RUBRICS FOR COUNSELORS Standards & Elements The evaluation system for school counselors is based on 5 Standards and 13 Elements. These Elements describe important competencies of effective school
Halifax County Public Schools. Business and Operations Administrator/Supervisor Evaluation and Final Evaluation Report
Halifax County Public Schools Business and Operations Administrator/Supervisor Evaluation and Final Evaluation Report Approved July 2012 73 74 Halifax County Public Schools Business and Operations Administrator/Supervisor
Standards for Educational Leaders (Principals, Superintendents, Curriculum Directors, and Supervisors)
Standards for Educational Leaders (rincipals, Superintendents, Curriculum Directors, and Supervisors) Introduction These Standards and Indicators were adapted from the Educational Leadership Constituencies
Framework and Guidelines for Principal Preparation Programs
THE FRAMEWORK FOR PRINCIPAL PREPARATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 1 Purpose Of all the educational research conducted over the last 30 years in the search to improve student
HUMAN RESOURCES IN PUBLIC EDUCATION Where are we? Where should we be? Where HR Divisions should be. Where most HR Divisions are
HUMAN RESOURCES IN PUBLIC EDUCATION Where are we? Where should we be? Human Capital Management Human Resources Department Personnel Department Levers: Differentiated Pay Career Ladders Distribution of
Ontario Leadership Strategy. Leadership Succession Planning and Talent Development Ministry Expectations and Implementation Continuum
Ontario Leadership Strategy Leadership Succession Planning and Talent Development Ministry Expectations and Implementation Continuum Contents 1. Purpose 2. Why Succession Planning and Talent Development?
Performance Appraisal: Director of Education. Date of Next Review: September 2015 (every 2 years)
POLICY SECTION: SUB-SECTION: POLICY NAME: POLICY NO: Board of Trustees Director Performance Appraisal: Director of Education H.C.06 Date Approved: September 26, 2013 Date of Next Review: September 2015
Under the Start Your Search Now box, you may search by author, title and key words.
VISTAS Online VISTAS Online is an innovative publication produced for the American Counseling Association by Dr. Garry R. Walz and Dr. Jeanne C. Bleuer of Counseling Outfitters, LLC. Its purpose is to
Educational Leadership
Master of Science in Education: Educational Leadership School Building Leader (SBL) Program or School Building Leader (SBL) /School District Leader (SDL) Program Program Overview The Educational Leadership
Domain 1: Strategic/Cultural Leadership
Framework for Leadership Types of Evidence Supervisor: Curriculum and Instruction Please note: The evidence identified here is provided to stimulate conversations that occur between a supervising authority
NCNSP Design Principle 1: Ready for College
College Credit College Ready Skills (High School) Course of Study NCNSP Design Principle 1: Ready for College Students are tracked according to past performance into regular and honors level courses. All
Prepared by: Kate Tarrant Prepared February 3, 2015
STATE POLICY TO PROMOTE EFFECTIVE TEACHING AND LEARNING Discussion Guide: In What Ways do Teaching Condition Support Effective Teachers? Prepared by: Kate Tarrant Prepared February 3, 2015 Please note
Self Assessment Tool for Principals and Vice-Principals
The Institute for Education Leadership (IEL) brings together representatives from the principals' associations, the supervisory officers' associations, councils of directors of education and the Ministry
Standard 1: Planning and Evaluation of a Data- Driven Counseling Program
Professional School Counselors TEM Framework and Rubric.0 Revised December 0, 0 Standard : Planning and Evaluation of a Data- Driven Counseling Program / Significantly For Level 5, all evidence at Level
Standards for Advanced Programs in Educational Leadership
Standards for Advanced Programs in Educational Leadership for Principals, Superintendents, Curriculum Directors, and Supervisors NATIONAL POLICY BOARD FOR EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION Published January,
The Role of the Professional School Counselor
The Role of the Professional School Counselor The professional school counselor is a certified/licensed educator trained in school counseling with unique qualifications and skills to address all students
PRO-NET. A Publication of Building Professional Development Partnerships for Adult Educators Project. April 2001
Management Competencies and Sample Indicators for the Improvement of Adult Education Programs A Publication of Building Professional Development Partnerships for Adult Educators Project PRO-NET April 2001
FRAMEWORK OF SUPPORT: SCHOOL-LEVEL PRACTICE PROFILE
FRAMEWORK OF SUPPORT: SCHOOL-LEVEL PRACTICE PROFILE S The Framework of Supports are a set of Practice Profiles that serve as an implementation overview of Support for Personalized Learning (SPL). Practice
Strategic Plan 2014 2018
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Strategic Plan 2014 2018 We focus on improving internal systems and processes in the Vermont Department of Health s Strategic Plan. By successfully implementing the Plan s objectives,
North Dakota PROGRAM REVIEW FOR SCHOOL COUNSELING PROGRAMS
North Dakota PROGRAM REVIEW FOR SCHOOL COUNSELING PROGRAMS District: Enrollment: Evaluator: School: Grades in School: Date of Evaluation: *Adapted from the American School Counseling Association National
2013 Marzano School Leader Evaluation Model Rubric
2013 Marzano School Leader Evaluation Model Rubric Exclusive partners with Dr. Robert J. Marzano for the Teacher Evaluation Model and School Leader Evaluation Model Learning Sciences International 175
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Counselors
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Counselors Definition of an Effective School Counselor Effective school counselors are vital members of the education
Sample Professional Learning Plan for Administrator
Sample Professional Learning Plan for Administrator Please indicate, with x in box, if administrator is on a plan of improvement Plan of Improvement Name: Position/Title: New Date Developed: District:
Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Nurses
Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Nurses Definition of an Effective School Nurse Effective school nurses are vital members of the education team. They are properly
Goal #1 Learner Success Ensure a distinctive learning experience and foster the success of students.
Western Michigan University is committed to being learner centered, discovery driven, and globally engaged as it transitions into the next strategic planning cycle. In the first year of the University
Leadership Through Strategic Discussions Between Supervising Administrator and Principals
Possible Guiding Questions Strategic Discussions Between Supervising Administrators and Principals This document utilizes the components within the Framework for Leadership to provide possible guiding
GaPSC Teacher Leadership Program Standards
GaPSC Teacher Leadership Program Standards Purpose: Georgia has identified a need to improve P-12 students academic performance as measured by various assessments. One method to ensure improved student
Section Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession
12 Section Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession 1 Teachers understand student learning and development and respect the diversity of the students they teach. Teachers display knowledge of how
*This is a sample only actual evaluations must completed and submitted in PeopleSoft*
*This is a sample only actual evaluations must completed and submitted in PeopleSoft* Employee information Employee name Position title/department Date of Hire Employee ID number Supervisor s name Today
Ohio Standards for School Counselors
Adopted by state board of education of ohio October, Ohio Standards for School Counselors Ohio Standards for School Counselors ii Contents Section I: Overview of the Ohio Standards for School Counselors...
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists Definition of an Effective School Psychologist Effective school psychologists are vital members of the education
Principal Practice Observation Tool
Principal Performance Review Office of School Quality Division of Teaching and Learning Principal Practice Observation Tool 2014-15 The was created as an evidence gathering tool to be used by evaluators
Teacher Rubric with Suggested Teacher and Student Look-fors
Teacher Rubric with Suggested Teacher and Student Look-fors This document is intended to inform school communities in recognizing the performance levels for key elements defined in the Teacher Rubric and
NORTH CAROLINA PROFESSIONAL SCHOOL SOCIAL WORK STANDARDS
NORTH CAROLINA PROFESSIONAL SCHOOL SOCIAL WORK STANDARDS Every public school student will graduate from high school globally competitive for work and postsecondary education and prepared for life in the
MCCORMICK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT JOB DESCRIPTION
MCCORMICK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT JOB DESCRIPTION POSITION TITLE: CONTRACT YEAR: SALARY: Department: K-12 Principal 240 Days Flexible Calendar/Hours Commensurate with Experience/Education K-12 Educational
360 Dr. Mike Richie SUPERINTENDENT LEADERSHIP PERFORMANCE
30 SUPERINTENDENT LEADERSHIP PERFORMANCE REVIEW Thank you for completing this survey. The 30 method systematically collects opinions about a superintendent's performance from a wide range of contacts.
The Pros and Cons of School Counseling Compartments
Louisiana School Counseling Performance Evaluation Rubric The Louisiana School Counseling Performance Evaluation Rubric Guided by the input of practitioners from around the state and the framework provided
Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School counselors
Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School counselors Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School Counselors Standard 1: school counselors demonstrate leadership, advocacy, and collaboration. Professional
DRAFT For use in 2012-13 validation process only Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School counselors
Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School counselors Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School Counselors Standard 1: school counselors demonstrate leadership, advocacy, and collaboration. Professional
Appendix E. Role-Specific Indicators
Appendix E. Role-Specific Indicators A frequent topic of debate with regard to educator evaluation both in Massachusetts and across the nation is the extent to which performance rubrics should be specific
Model for Comprehensive and Integrated School Psychological Services
Model for Comprehensive and Integrated School Psychological Services 2010 INTRODUCTION The mission of the National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) is to represent school psychology and support
SBBC: JJ-002 FL: 28 THE SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA JOB DESCRIPTION. Approved School-based Administrators Salary Schedule
THE SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA JOB DESCRIPTION POSITION TITLE: CONTRACT YEAR: PAY GRADE: School Assistant Principal Eleven Months* Approved School-based Administrators Salary Schedule QUALIFICATIONS:
Managers Self- Assessment Questionnaire. HWDSB Managers Self-Assessment: September 2012 1
Managers Self- Assessment Questionnaire HWDSB Managers Self-Assessment: September 0 How to Use This Self-Assessment This self-assessment questionnaire is intended to help managers focus on and evaluate
Quick Reference Guide Ohio Standards for Professional Development
Quick Reference Guide Ohio Standards for Professional Development About the Standards Creating a system of effective learning is one way that school systems can support all educators and encourage improved
TOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES
Get to Know My RE Observe Collect Evidence Mentor Moments Reflect Review Respond Tailor Support Provide Provide specific feedback specific Feedback What does my RE need? Practice Habits Of Mind Share Data
Possible Guiding Questions: Strategic Discussions between Supervising Administrators and Curriculum & Instruction Supervisors
Strategic Discussions between Supervising Administrators and Curriculum & Instruction Supervisors This document utilizes the components within the Framework for Leadership to provide possible guiding questions
Educator Evaluation System Standards. Preamble
Educator Evaluation System Standards Preamble Improving achievement requires recruitment of talented teachers and principals and stronger instructional practices, which in turn are driven by strategic
Strategic Plan SFY 2014-2015. Oklahoma Department of Human Services
Strategic Plan SFY 2014-2015 Oklahoma Department of Human Services GROWING in a NEW DIRECTION SFY 2014-2015 Strategy Map HRM Strategic Plan Page 1 OUR MISSION We improve the quality of life of vulnerable
LOUISIANA SCHOOL COUNSELING. Performance Evaluation Rubric
LOUISIANA SCHOOL COUNSELING Performance Evaluation Rubric Reformatted for 2013-2014 The Louisiana School Counseling Performance Evaluation Rubric Guided by the input of practitioners from around the state
Educational Leadership Program Standards. ELCC Revised Standards
Educational Leadership Program Standards ELCC Revised Standards For Advanced Programs that Prepare Principals, Superintendents, Curriculum Directors, and Supervisors March 2009 NATIONAL POLICY BOARD FOR
NORTH CAROLINA PROFESSIONAL SCHOOL SOCIAL WORK STANDARDS
NORTH CAROLINA PROFESSIONAL SCHOOL SOCIAL WORK STANDARDS Every public school student will graduate from high school globally competitive for work and postsecondary education and prepared for life in the
Lincoln Park Public Schools Special Education Teacher Consultant Evaluation
Lincoln Park Public Schools Special Education Teacher Consultant Evaluation Teacher Consultant: Evaluator: Date: Domain 1: Planning and Preparing for Student Learning The teacher consultant uses a wide
GRESHAM-BARLOW SCHOOL DISTRICT K-12 GUIDANCE AND COUNSELING PROGRAM OVERVIEW
GRESHAM-BARLOW SCHOOL DISTRICT K-12 GUIDANCE AND COUNSELING PROGRAM OVERVIEW Developed 2005 1 Comprehensive Guidance and Counseling Framework Mission The mission of the Comprehensive Guidance and Counseling
Approved by the Virginia Board of Education on September 27, 2012. Virginia Department of Education P. O. Box 2120 Richmond, Virginia 23218-2120
Advancing Virginia's Leadership Agenda Guidance Document: Standards and Indicators for School Leaders and Documentation for the Principal of Distinction (Level II) Administration and Supervision Endorsement
Human Capital Update
Finance & Administration Committee Information Item IV-A July 10, 2014 Human Capital Update Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary Action Information MEAD Number:
ASAE s Job Task Analysis Strategic Level Competencies
ASAE s Job Task Analysis Strategic Level Competencies During 2013, ASAE funded an extensive, psychometrically valid study to document the competencies essential to the practice of association management
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF PASCO COUNTY JOB DESCRIPTION ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT FOR ADMINISTRATION
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF PASCO COUNTY JOB DESCRIPTION ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT FOR ADMINISTRATION QUALIFICATIONS: (1) Master s Degree from an accredited educational institution. (2) Certification in Educational
Hood River County School District K-12 Guidance and Counseling Program Overview
Hood River County School District K-12 Guidance and Counseling Program Overview Serving the Students of Hood River County 1 June 2015 Comprehensive Guidance and Counseling Framework Mission The Guidance
DPS Transformation Our Mission
DPS Transformation Our Mission In partnership with parents and our community, Detroit Public Schools exists to provide a comprehensive educational experience that is high quality, challenging, and inspires
North Carolina New Schools Page 1 of 14
Design Principles Overview North Carolina New Schools partners with local school districts and higher education institutions to help secondary schools become nimble, rigorous and focused institutions that
Garden City Public Schools Strategic Plan. Vision: Student Focused Team Driven Globally Competitive with a Hometown Spirit
Garden City Public Schools Strategic Plan Mission: Our mission is to be a learning community that ensures a safe, caring, quality education for students of all ages to prepare for the possibilities of
There was some evidence found that the school has implemented the practice(s) and/or build the conditions described in the standard.
The Oakland Unified School District is committed to supporting high levels of learning for every student, ensuring that students are prepared for success in college, in ir careers, and as citizens. We
2015-2016 Instructional Management Plan
Greenwood Public School District Dr. Montrell Greene, Superintendent Dr. June Leigh, Director of Curriculum 2015-2016 Instructional Management Plan Greenwood Public School District Academic Education Department
Colorado Professional Teaching Standards
Colorado Professional Teaching Standards Standard I: Teachers demonstrate knowledge of the content they teach a. Teachers provide instruction that is aligned with the Colorado Academic Standards and their
New York State Professional Development Standards (PDF/Word) New York State. Professional Development Standards. An Introduction
New York State Professional Development Standards New York State Professional Development Standards (PDF/Word) Background on the Development of the Standards New York State Professional Development Standards
Principal/Assistant Principal/School Administrator Evaluation System Rubric ADEQUATE PERFORMANCE
Principal/Assistant Principal/School Administrator Evaluation System Rubric The purpose of this Rubric is to assist in interpreting what levels of performance might look like. Like any rubric, it is a
Principal Appraisal Overview
Improving teaching, leading and learning T e x a s P r i n c i p a l E va l u a t i o n S y s t e m Principal Appraisal Overview Design and Development a collaborative effort McREL International Texas
Committee On Public Secondary Schools. Standards for Accreditation
Committee On Public Secondary Schools Standards for Accreditation Effective 2011 New England Association of Schools & Colleges 3 Burlington Woods Drive, Suite 100 Burlington, MA 01803 Tel. 781-425-7700
