Advancing Laboratory Interoperability in Health IT

Similar documents
Meaningful Use Stage 2 as it Relates to the Lab Implementing the Public Health Agency Interface. Interface

Understanding Meaningful Use with a Focus on Testing the HL7 V2 Messaging Standards

Eligible Professionals please see the document: MEDITECH Prepares You for Stage 2 of Meaningful Use: Eligible Professionals.

Certification Guidance for EHR Technology Developers Serving Health Care Providers Ineligible for Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Payments

HL7 and Meaningful Use

ONC s Laboratory Results Interface (LRI) and Laboratory Orders Interface (LOI) Implementation Guides and LIS-EHR Data Exchange

LIS Vendor Landscape and Options for Meeting ELR Meaningful Use

MEANINGFUL USE and POPULATION HEALTH

Enabling Patients Decision Making Power: A Meaningful Use Outcome. Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

Meaningful Use Stage 1 and Public Health: Lesson Learned

Summary of the Proposed Rule for the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program (Eligible Professionals only)

Meaningful Use: Stage 1 and 2 Hospitals (EH) and Providers (EP) Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

Meaningful Use Objectives

Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Hospitals and Eligible Professionals (EPs)

HL7 & Meaningful Use. Charles Jaffe, MD, PhD CEO Health Level Seven International. HIMSS 11 Orlando February 23, 2011

Meaningful Use Rules Proposed for Electronic Health Record Incentives Under HITECH Act By: Cherilyn G. Murer, JD, CRA

Summary of the Final Rule for Meaningful Use for 2015 and Meaningful Use Objectives for 2015 and 2016

Client Alert. CMS Releases Proposed Rule On Meaningful Use Of Electronic Health Record Technology

TEST INSTRUCTIONS FOR CROSS VENDOR EXCHANGE TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE B5: STAGE 2 OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES

CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview October 8, 2015

MEANINGFUL USE. Community Center Readiness Guide Additional Resource #13 Meaningful Use Implementation Tracking Tool (Template) CONTENTS:

Meaningful Use in 2015 and Beyond Changes for Stage 2

Electronic Health Records: The Intersection of Public Health Surveillance and Clinical Medicine

STANDARDS. MEANINGFUL USE 42 CFR 495.6(j)-(m) Stage 2 Objective Edition EHR CERTIFICATION CRITERIA 45 CFR

Stage 2 Meaningful Use What the Future Holds. Lindsey Wiley, MHA HIT Manager Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

HITECH Act Update: An Overview of the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Regulations

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Reporting Period: For Stage 2, the reporting period must be the entire Federal Fiscal Year.

STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE CORE AND MENU MEASURES FOR ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONALS

Incentives to Accelerate EHR Adoption

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Last Updated: August, 2012

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

Meaningful Use. Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2015 Tipsheet

Achieving Meaningful Use with Centricity EMR

Agenda. What is Meaningful Use? Stage 2 - Meaningful Use Core Set. Stage 2 - Menu Set. Clinical Quality Measures (CQM) Clinical Considerations

EHR/Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use Stage 2 MU Audits

Qualifying for Medicare Incentive Payments with Crystal Practice Management. Version

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Certification: A Guide for EHR Product Managers

HL7 and Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use Updates. HIT Summit September 19, 2015

The HITECH Act and Meaningful Use Implications for Population and Public Health

Summary of Public Health Related Aspects of Recent ONC and CMS Final Rules Version 1.0

Meaningful Use Final Rule Update. Patti Kritzberger, RHIT, CHPS Tracey Regimbal, RHIT HIT-Quality Improvement Specialists

Using Patient Portals to Achieve Meaningful Use Stage 2

Stage 2 Overview Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012

TABLE 4: STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE OBJECTIVES AND ASSOCIATED MEASURES SORTED BY CORE AND MENU SET

EHR Incentive Program Stage 3 Objectives & Measures Crosswalk of Stage 3 Proposed Objectives, Measures & Corresponding Stage 2 Measures

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 171 / Tuesday, September 4, 2012 / Rules and Regulations

MedlinePlus Connect. Boost Box October 9, 2012

COMMUNICATIONS PLAN FOR ELECTRONIC LABORATORY REPORTING COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT PLAN

T he Health Information Technology for Economic

Stage 3/2015 Edition Health IT Certification Criteria Proposed Rules Overview May 11, 2015

Meaningful Use Updates Stage 2 and 3. Julia Moore, Business Analyst SMC Partners, LLC July 8, 2015

Mark Anderson, FHIMSS, CPHIMSS Healthcare IT Futurist

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012

Meaningful Use and Lab Related Requirements

Meaningful Use Stage 2

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison for Eligible Professionals

VIII. Dentist Crosswalk

Meaningful Use Stage 3 Proposed Rule: What it Means for Hospitals, Physicians & Health IT Developers

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs- Past, Present, & Future. Travis Broome, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 12/18/2012

New Jersey Department of Health. Electronic Laboratory Reporting On-Boarding Manual. Version 1.4

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 15 of 17 Last Updated: August, 2015

Public Health 101 Series

SUMMARY. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Programs Stage 2 Final Rule CMS-0044-F

HITECH MEANINGFUL USE

MEDICFUSION / HERFERT. MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 1 and 2 ATTESTATION GUIDE 2015

Michigan Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Update Jason Werner - MDCH

Presented by. Terri Gonzalez Director of Practice Improvement North Carolina Medical Society

Medicare and Medicaid Programs; EHR Incentive Programs

EHR Incentive Program Updates. Jason Felts, MS HIT Practice Advisor

Agenda. Overview of Stage 2 Final Rule Impact to Program

An Overview of Meaningful Use: FAQs

Transcription:

Advancing Laboratory Interoperability in Health IT Introduction & CDC LabHIT Update Megan E. Sawchuk, MT(ASCP) Health Scientist Clinical Laboratory Improvement Advisory Committee (CLIAC) 8-22-2013 Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services (proposed) Division of Laboratory Programs, Standards, and Services (proposed)

Background The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act Enacted as part of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) Promotes widespread adoption and standardization of health information technology (HIT) Unprecedented investment in HIT Lightning speed advancement of regulations 2

Meaningful Use of Health Information Technology 2 Sets of Bookend Regulations for Electronic Health Records Working together to ensure quality EHR Certification Requirements Regulations overseen by the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) EHR test methods developed and implemented by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Methods applied by Authorized Testing and Certification Bodies (ATCBs) EHR Incentive Program Regulations overseen by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) EHR performance measures are used to determine incentive payments for eligible healthcare providers Administered by CMS and State Medicaid Agencies 3

Stage 3-2016 Advanced Uses of Data Stage 2-2014 Information Exchange Stage 1-2012 Infrastructure 4

Overview of Laboratory Data Related Meaningful Use Objectives and EHR Certification Criteria Meaningful Use Objectives Laboratory Results in EHR Laboratory Results to Ambulatory Providers Lab Orders by Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) Reportable Lab Results to Public Health Agencies EHR Certification Criteria Which Include Laboratory Data Patient Lists Patient Reminders Clinical Decision Support Patient Specific Education 5

Standards Supporting Electronic Transmission of Data From ONC s Interoperability Strategy presentation, 2013 Government Health IT Conference. Doug Fridsma, Chief Science Officer & Director, Office of Science and Technology. http://www.govhealthitconference.com/session1-1.aspx 6

Standards Supporting Electronic Transmission of Laboratory Data Vocabulary Standards Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) o Version 2.40, June 2012 Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) o International Release, July 2012 and US Extension to SNOMED CT, March 2012 Release Content Structure Standards Technical specifications defined in HL7 Implementation Guides o HL7 v2.5.1 Lab Orders Interface (LOI) o HL7 v2.5.1 Lab Results Interface (LRI) o HL7 v2.5.1 Electronic Laboratory Reporting to Public Health (ELR) o HL7 Version 3 (Infobutton) 7

Meaningful Use Objectives Which Include Laboratory Data CORE OBJECTIVE MEANINGFUL USE Stage 2 Objective 42 CFR 495.6(j)-(m) MEANINGFUL USE Stage 2 Measure 42 CFR 495.6(j)-(m) EHR CERTIFICATION CRITERIA 2014 Edition 45 CFR 170.314 STANDARDS Eligible Providers Eligible Hospitals Lab Results in EHR > 55% of all clinical lab tests results whose results are either in a positive/negative affirmation or numerical format are incorporated in CEHRT as structured data. Ambulatory setting: Electronically receive and incorporate clinical laboratory tests and values/results in accordance with specified standards. Electronically display the tests and values/results received in human readable format. Inpatient setting only: Electronically receive clinical laboratory tests and values/results in a structured format. Electronically display such tests and values/results in human readable format. Electronically display all the information for a test report specified in CLIA at 42 CFR 493.1291(c)(1) through (7). Electronically attribute, associate, or link a laboratory test and value/result with a laboratory order or patient record. HL7 Version 2.5.1 Lab Results Interface (LRI) LOINC version 2.40, June 2012 A universal code system for identifying laboratory and clinical observations produced by the Regenstrief Institute, Inc. Table excerpted from 2014 Edition EHR Certification Criteria and Meaningful Use Objectives document on the Office of the National Coordinator s website, retrieved 8-19-13: http://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/meaningfulusetablesseries2_110112.pdf 8

CORE OBJECTIVE Eligible Hospitals (Menu item, not Core) Eligible Providers Eligible Hospitals Eligible Hospitals Meaningful Use Objectives Which Include Laboratory Data MEANINGFUL USE Stage 2 Objective 42 CFR 495.6(j)-(m) Lab Results to Ambulatory Providers Lab Orders by Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) Reportable Lab Results to Public Health Agencies MEANINGFUL USE Stage 2 Measure 42 CFR 495.6(j)-(m) Hospital labs send structured electronic clinical lab results to the ordering provider for more than 20% of electronic lab orders received. EHR CERTIFICATION CRITERIA 2014 Edition 45 CFR 170.314 EHR technology must be able to electronically create laboratory test reports for electronic transmission. >30% of laboratory orders Enable a user to electronically record, change, and access laboratory orders. Successful ongoing submission of electronic reportable laboratory results from CEHRT to a public health agency for the entire EHR reporting period. *Exclusions apply: see CMS rule for details EHR technology must be able to electronically create reportable laboratory tests and values/results for electronic transmission. STANDARDS HL7 Version 2.5.1 Lab Results Interface (LRI) LOINC version 2.40, June 2012. HL7 Version 2.5.1 Lab Orders Interface (LOI) HL7 2.5.1 Electronic Laboratory Reporting to Public Health (ELR). IHTSDO SNOMED CT International Release, July 2012 and US Extension to SNOMED CT, March 2012 Release. LOINC version 2.40, June 2012. Table excerpted from 2014 Edition EHR Certification Criteria and Meaningful Use Objectives document on the Office of the National Coordinator s website, retrieved 8-19-13: http://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/meaningfulusetablesseries2_110112.pdf 9

EHR Certification Criteria Which Include Laboratory Data CORE OBJECTIVE Eligible Providers Eligible Hospitals MEANINGFUL USE Stage 2 Objective 42 CFR 495.6(j)-(m) Patient Lists MEANINGFUL USE Stage 2 Measure 42 CFR 495.6(j)-(m) Generate at least one report listing patients of the EP, EH, or CAH with a specific condition. Eligible Providers Patient Reminders More than 10% of all unique patients who have had two or more office visits with the EP within the 24 months before the beginning of the EHR reporting period were sent a reminder, per patient preference when available. *Exclusions apply: see CMS rule for details EHR CERTIFICATION CRITERIA 2014 Edition 45 CFR 170.314 Enable a user to electronically and dynamically select, sort, access, and create patient lists by: date and time; and based on laboratory tests and values/results In Ambulatory setting only, also create lists by patient communication preferences. Enable a user to electronically and dynamically select, sort, access, and create patient lists by: date and time; and based on laboratory tests and values/results. In Ambulatory setting only, also create lists by patient communication preferences. STANDARDS HL7 Version 2.5.1 Lab Results Interface (LRI) LOINC version 2.40, June 2012 HL7 2.5.1 Electronic Laboratory Reporting to Public Health (ELR). IHTSDO SNOMED CT International Release, July 2012 and US Extension to SNOMED CT, March 2012 Release. LOINC version 2.40, June 2012. Table excerpted from 2014 Edition EHR Certification Criteria and Meaningful Use Objectives document on the Office of the National Coordinator s website, retrieved 8-19-13: http://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/meaningfulusetablesseries2_110112.pdf 10

CORE OBJECTIVE Eligible Providers Eligible Hospitals Eligible Providers Eligible Hospitals EHR Certification Criteria Which Include Laboratory Data MEANINGFUL USE Stage 2 Objective 42 CFR 495.6(j)- (m) Clinical Decision Support Patient Specific Education MEANINGFUL USE Stage 2 Measure 42 CFR 495.6(j)-(m) Implement five clinical decision support interventions related to four or more clinical quality measures. *Exclusions apply: see CMS rule for details EP: Patient-specific education resources identified by CEHRT are provided to patients for more than 10% of all unique patients with office visits. *Exclusions apply: see CMS rule for details EHR CERTIFICATION CRITERIA 2014 Edition 45 CFR 170.314 Enable a limited set of identified users to select one or more clinical decision support interventions based on each one and at least one combination of the following data: (A) Problem list; (B) Medication list; (C) Medication allergy list; (D) Demographics; (E) Laboratory tests and values/results; and (F) Vital signs. EHR technology must be able to electronically identify for a user patient-specific education resources based on laboratory tests and values/results. STANDARDS HL7 Version 3 (Infobutton) HL7 Version 3 (Infobutton) EHs/CAHs: More than 10% of all unique patients admitted to the EH s or CAH's inpatient or emergency departments are provided patient-specific education resources identified by CEHRT. Table excerpted from 2014 Edition EHR Certification Criteria and Meaningful Use Objectives document on the Office of the National Coordinator s website, retrieved 8-19-13: http://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/meaningfulusetablesseries2_110112.pdf 11

CDC s LabHIT Team Vision: Laboratory information contributes to optimized healthcare decision making. Engagement Forum to Engage and Coordinate Laboratory Efforts Laboratorians Participate Early In EHR/HIT Planning Regulations and Guidelines Incorporate Lab Input Interoperability Support Harmonization (SNOMED & LOINC) Harmonized Interfaces Meaningful Comparisons of Lab Information Usability & Contextuality Explore Innovative Information Display Results Interpreted Correctly Adverse outcomes reduced 12

LabHIT Activities ONC Laboratory Report Workgroup Tiger Team Producing recommendations intended to reduce the cost and burden associated with implementing an ambulatory EHR to LIS interface (Laboratory Orders and Laboratory Results Interfaces). Includes the Tiger Team and three subgroups: o Policy o Standards o Certification 13

LabHIT Activities Content Standards Development and Related Activities S&I Laboratory Order Interface (LOI) HL7 Implementation Guide for EHR vendors S&I Laboratory Results Interface (LRI) - HL7 Implementation Guide for EHR vendors S&I electronic Directory of Service (edos) - HL7 Implementation Guide for EHR vendors S&I LOI/LRI CLIA Compliance Workgroup (active) Crosswalk of CLIA requirements to HL7 field sets to support the Implementation Guides NIST CLIA Certification Profile (pending) Enhance online LRI certification tool for EHR vendors to test for CLIA requirements NIST Big Data workgroup (new) Engaged Dr. Michael Becich (pathology informatics geneticist) from UPenn to participate Electronic Laboratory Reporting (not active, ad hoc) Provided input to improve clinical relevance of certification use cases 14

LabHIT Activities Content Standards Development and Related Activities S&I Health edecisions (ad hoc) S&I Query Health (ad hoc) S&I Structured Data Capture (active workgroup considering resources for LabHIT participation) S&I Data Access Framework (active) HL7 Variant Call File Transmission (active) HL7 Implementation Guide for the technical specifications of transmitting molecular genetics files from research laboratory to EHR. (Note this is not an S&I related activity. HL7 is operating this implementation guide workgroup in parallel to CDC s Next Generation Sequencing workgroup activities.) 15

LabHIT Activities Vocabulary Standards Development APHL s Laboratory Community of Practice (ongoing) Harmonizing and updating SNOMED specimen type coding, map to LOINC CDC s Reportable Conditions Cross Mapping Table Mapping reportable conditions to SNOMED coding LOINC Enhancement Project (proposed) Identifying top 80-90% order code set for ambulatory providers Advancing Laboratory Interoperability (draft proposal) short, mid and long range planning for full-scale semantic interoperability for laboratory data. Vision is to create a single national reference database of recommended vocabulary sets with mapping of FDA approved test systems to vocabulary code systems (e.g. LOINC, SNOMED, UCUM) NIH LOINC for Variant Call Files (proposed, pending funding) - Mapping LOINC to molecular genetics terms 16

EMAIL THE CDC S LABHIT TEAM IF YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION CAN PARTICIPATE ON A STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT WORKGROUP. LABHIT@CDC.GOV 17

Dr. Doug Fridsma Introduction of Speakers ONC Chief Science Officer & Director, Office of Science & Technology Mr. Robert Dieterle ONC Contractor for S&I Framework and Laboratory Tiger Team and CEO EnableCare Group, LLC Dr. Alexis Carter Director of Pathology Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine Dr. Sundak Ganesan CDC Health Scientist, Division of Informatics Solutions and Operations Dr. Nancy Cornish CDC Medical Officer, Division of Laboratory Programs, Standards, and Services (proposed) 18

References ONC EHR Incentives and Certification: http://www.healthit.gov/providersprofessionals/ehr-incentives-certification ONC Authorized Testing and Certifications Bodies: http://www.healthit.gov/policy-researchers-implementers/authorized-testingand-certifications-bodies CMS EHR Incentive Program: http://www.cms.gov/regulations-and- Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/index.html?redirect=/EHRIncentive Programs/ NIST Test Methods: http://healthcare.nist.gov/use_testing/ Standards & Interoperability Framework: http://www.siframework.org/ 19

Thank you!

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop F-11, Atlanta, GA 30333 CLIA Information Line: 1-404-498-2290 TTY: 1-888-232-6348 E-mail: LabHIT@cdc.gov Web: http://wwwn.cdc.gov/clia/ The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services (proposed) Division of Laboratory Programs, Standards, and Services (proposed)