Meaningful Use - HL7 Version 2



Similar documents
Meaningful Use - HL7 Version 2

Public Health Reporting Initiative Functional Requirements Description

HL7 and Meaningful Use

1a-b. Title: Clinical Decision Support Helps Memorial Healthcare System Achieve 97 Percent Compliance With Pediatric Asthma Core Quality Measures

HIE Ready 2.0 SPECIFICATIONS MATRIX. Product Name: Version Number: Preferred Message and Trigger

Electronic Public Health Case Reporting: Current & Future Possibilities. Joint Public Health Forum & CDC Nationwide Call October 16, 2014

Healthcare Data: Secondary Use through Interoperability

HL7 and Meaningful Use

Consensus Framework for Advancing Public Health Informatics

COMMUNICATIONS PLAN FOR ELECTRONIC LABORATORY REPORTING COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT PLAN

New Jersey Department of Health. Electronic Laboratory Reporting On-Boarding Manual. Version 1.4

HL7 & Meaningful Use. Charles Jaffe, MD, PhD CEO Health Level Seven International. HIMSS 11 Orlando February 23, 2011

Agenda. What is Meaningful Use? Stage 2 - Meaningful Use Core Set. Stage 2 - Menu Set. Clinical Quality Measures (CQM) Clinical Considerations

Expanded Support for Medicaid Health Information Exchanges

Meaningful Use Updates Stage 2 and 3. Julia Moore, Business Analyst SMC Partners, LLC July 8, 2015

Meaningful Use. Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Planning for Health Information Technology and Exchange in Public Health

Eligible Professionals please see the document: MEDITECH Prepares You for Stage 2 of Meaningful Use: Eligible Professionals.

White Paper. Assure Health IT Standards for Public Health. Part I: Health IT Standards in Public Health Laboratory Domain

HIMSS Interoperability Showcase 2011

Eligible Professional EHR Incentive Program Objectives and Measures for 2016 Objective 10 of 10 Date updated: February 4, 2016

BUSINESS CASE: The Role of Public Health in National Health Information Technology Standardization

Enabling Patients Decision Making Power: A Meaningful Use Outcome. Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

New York ehealth Collaborative. Health Information Exchange and Interoperability April 2012

STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE CORE AND MENU MEASURES FOR ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONALS

LIS Vendor Landscape and Options for Meeting ELR Meaningful Use

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison for Eligible Professionals

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Last Updated: August, 2012

Demonstrating Meaningful Use of EHRs: The top 10 compliance challenges for Stage 1 and what s new with 2

Health Information Exchange in NYS

Nitin Kunte, MBA OZ Systems Kathleen Brousseau, PMP New York State Department of Health

Health Information Exchange. Scalable and Affordable

GE Healthcare. Meaningful Use 2014 Prep: Menu and Interfaces. Ray Bender, DPh, PMP Product Manager January 16, 2014

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 15 of 17 Last Updated: August, 2015

The HITECH Act and Meaningful Use Implications for Population and Public Health

AAP Meaningful Use: Certified EHR Technology Criteria

HIMSS Interoperability Showcase 2011

MEANINGFUL USE and POPULATION HEALTH

Meaningful Use HL7 Version 2

Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 7 of 17 Stage 2 Date issued: August, 2014

STAGES 1 AND 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

Electronic Medical Records and Public Health

CAPABILITY 12: Public Health Laboratory Testing

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Implementation Guide

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Update: Deploying SNOMED CT to provide decision support in the EHR

STAGE 2 of the EHR Incentive Programs

Bela T. Matyas, MD, MPH Health Officer, Solano County

Meaningful Use Stage 2 MU Audits

Webinar #1 Meaningful Use: Stage 1 & 2 Comparison CPS 12 & UDS 2013

MFI 4 Extended Registry SC32/WG2

MemorialCare Health System: Steven Beal, VP Information Services

Overview of MU Stage 2 Joel White, Health IT Now

Clinical Document Exchange Integration Guide - Outbound

HIMSS Electronic Health Record Definitional Model Version 1.0

Summary of the Final Rule for Meaningful Use for 2015 and Meaningful Use Objectives for 2015 and 2016

HITPC Meaningful Use Stage 3 Final Recommendations

NSSP Onboarding Workgroup Meeting

Conformance Testing of Healthcare Data Exchange Standards for EHR Certification

Understanding Meaningful Use with a Focus on Testing the HL7 V2 Messaging Standards

EHR Incentive Program Stage 3 Objectives & Measures Crosswalk of Stage 3 Proposed Objectives, Measures & Corresponding Stage 2 Measures

Meaningful Use Stage 2

VIII. Dentist Crosswalk

SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE 2013 AHA ANNUAL SURVEY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPLEMENT

I n t e r S y S t e m S W h I t e P a P e r F O R H E A L T H C A R E IT E X E C U T I V E S. In accountable care

Health Home Performance Enhancement through Novel Reuse of Syndromic Surveillance Data

ARRA HITECH Meaningful Use Objectives & Implications to Public Health Lab

Health Information Exchange in Minnesota & North Dakota

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Understanding Meaningful Use Stage 2

Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Hospitals and Eligible Professionals (EPs)

2015 National Conference on Health Statistics. Carol DeFrances, Ph.D. National Center for Health Statistics

Transcription:

Meaningful Use - HL7 Version 2 HL7 Version 2 and Surveillance Reporting HIMSS, 2011 Orlando John Quinn, HL7 CTO February 2011

Contributors to Today s Presentation Anna Orlova, PhD, Executive Director, Public Health Data Standards Consortium and Johns Hopkins University Lori Reed-Fourquet, Owner/Consultant, e- HealthSign, LLC John Quinn HL7 CTO, Accenture

What we will cover Pre-Meaningful Use public health surveillance efforts Meaningful Use and public health surveillance How HL7 is essential to the story

Public Health Surveillance is the Key Activity of Health Departments to Protect the Public s Health Typical Modern Hospital Laboratory

Here we have a sick patient Lab The being tests lab examined performs are ordered in the a hospital tests to assist Public Health in and Surveillance diagnosing produces the a lab patient report which is returned to the Diagnosing and Treating ordering Hospital clinician Patients Components: 1. Event detection based on the laboratory, clinical encounter data and non-clinical data 2. Event investigation (case investigation/assessment) Lab 3. Event monitoringresult 4. Event management (outbreak management) 5. Evaluation of the event management intervention(s) 6. Event mitigation (prevention) Typical Modern Hospital Laboratory

Public Health Surveillance Systems CDC Environmental Public Health Tracking Network - health effects data with human exposure data and environmental hazard data. CDC National Notifiable Disease Surveillance System (NNDSS) laboratory and clinical data on nationally defined list of communicable diseases State Disease Surveillance Systems - laboratory and clinical data on jurisdictionally-defined list of reportable diseases (conditions) Local and State Syndromic Surveillance Systems syndromic data from clinical and non-clinical sources to detect a public health threat event

Pre-Meaningful Use Efforts on Public Health Surveillance Lab PHER Report HITSP Electronic Lab Reporting Interoperability HL7 Specification (IS 01) specifies HL7 2.5.1 message and CDA R2 for laboratory results reporting to public health agencies HITSP Biosurveillance Interoperability Specification (IS 02) specifies HL7 2.5.1 for message-based and HL7 CDA R2 for structured document submission of syndromic data HITSP Public Health Reporting Interoperability Specification (IS 11) specifies HL7 2.5.1 for messagebased and HL7 CDA R2 for structured document submission of notifiable/reportable diseases data

Pre-Meaningful Use Efforts on Public Health Surveillance Public Health Partners: Lab PHER Report HL7 Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL) Public Health Data Standards Consortium (PHDSC)

Meaningful Use of HIT and Public Health Surveillance Focus of MU Stage 1 requirement is: Syndromic Surveillance Public Health Stakeholder International Society for Disease Surveillance (ISDS) (http://www.syndromic.org/)

Meaningful Use of Health IT and Syndromic Surveillance Applies to all healthcare providers (inpatient, outpatient and emergency care) Focuses on infectious diseases Focuses on local and state syndromic surveillance systems not reporting to federal agencies Focuses on: Event detection based on the laboratory, clinical encounter data and non-clinical data Event investigation (case investigation/assessment) Event monitoring Event management (outbreak management) Evaluation of the event management intervention(s) Event mitigation (prevention) Synonym terms used in the past: biosurveillance and situational awareness

Meaningful Use of Health IT and Syndromic Surveillance Data Requirements: Facility demographics including contact data for the report and sender data Patient demographics Laboratory and radiology orders and results Vital signs (heart rate, respiratory, blood pressure, height and weight) Observation, symptoms and clinical findings Triage notes Pregnancy status Data elements on severity of illness (ventilated/intubated indicators) ICU indicators

Meaningful Use of Health IT and Syndromic Surveillance Specifies data submission using HL7 v2.3.1 and HL7 v2.5.1 Data requirements are mostly the same as specified in the Biosurveillance Minimum dataset with additions of patientidentifiable data as background can be found: HITSP Encounter Message Component (HITSP C39) specifies Biosurveillance dataset for message-based data submission HITSP EHR Lab Terminology (HITSP C35, 36, 37) URL specified vocabularies and terminologies for Lab reports HITSP Encounter Document (HITSP C48) - specifies Biosurveillance dataset for document-based data submission HITSP Anonymize Component (HITSP C25) - specifies Biosurveillance identifiers to be anonymized Source: HITSP Document Library. URLhttp://www.hitsp.org/#tp

Ultimately Implementation and use of interfaces based on HL7 V2.3.1 or V2.5.1 will require a specific implementation specification: From Segments and Trigger Event through wrapper detail Removes all optionality and specifies (if needed) z-segments Specifies specific data element allowable code-set mapping values A relevant balloted standard implementation guide exists for 2.5 HL7 Version 2.5.1 Implementation Guide: Electronic Laboratory Reporting to Public Health (US Realm), Release 1 This addresses a part of the needed solution.

Public Health Surveillance and Meaningful Use of HIT Traditional Public Health Surveillance (Case Reporting ) Specific Case Notification Messages Syndromic Surveillance (Biosurveillance) Monitor routine clinical data for public health concerns

How HL7 is Essential to Public Health Surveillance Story HL7 standards should enable submission of electronic surveillance data to public health agencies according to applicable law and practice. HL7 2.3.1 format (no implementation guide specified), or HL7 2.5.1 format in conformance with the Public Health Information Network HL7 Version 2.5 Message Structure Specification for National Condition Reporting Final Version1.0 and Errata and Clarifications National Notification Message Structural Specification specifies the use of Case Notification Message Mapping Guides published by the CDC at: http://www.cdc.gov/phin/resources/guides/mmghomepagecasenotification.html

Public Health Surveillance and Meaningful Use of HIT What/When/Who/Whom to report (varies by condition and by jurisdiction) Impacts the Provider organization workflow which must be accommodated in the tool used to support fulfillment of reporting requirements Reporting tool options

Public Health Case Reporting Workflow Where is the decision to report? Human EHR HIE Auxiliary Decision Support Utility Interface Engine

Public Health Case Reporting Workflow (EHR) EHR Collects Case Reporting Data EHR submits Case Report Level of detail not generally in an EHR Will require follow-up with patient for additional data Workflow and products for case reporting Dedicated Personnel Service or specialty product (EHR Module, 3 rd Party) EHR Surfacing Public Health Case Report Form Retrieve Form for Data Capture (IHE, HITSP) Allows pre-population of EHR data Allows data entry for non-ehr managed data Point of Care

Public Health Case Reporting Workflow (Health Information Exchange) HIE May Support Knowledge to Trigger Reporting on Behalf of EHR HIE May Offer Forms Data Capture HIE May Supply Subscription to Notifiable Content to Public Health HIE May Supply Query Access to Public Health Support for Biosurveillance Support for Anonymizing/Pseudonymizing for Data Mining

Public Health Case Reporting Workflow (Other Reporting Tools) Auxiliary Decision Support Utility May support other reporting needs (e.g. Quality Reporting/Analysis) Application Service Interface Engine Need to define triggers and content

Reportable Condition Processor *For an explanation of the Dwyer Tables see http://www.cdc.gov/phin/library/documents/pdf/introduction_to_the_phin_notifiable_condi tion_mapping_tables.pdf Realtime Compare to Dwyer I* E-mail Abnormal flag, Summary Organism name in Dwyer II*, Value above threshold Daily Batch To Public Health Inbound HL7 Potentially Reportable Record Count as denominator Reportable Condition Reportable Conditions Databases Print Reports To Infection Control Source: Shaun Grannis. Lecture in Public Health in NHIN Course 309.860.11 Johns Hopkins School fo Public Health. 2007

Links To More Information CDC Public Health Information Network (PHIN) Resources: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/phin/resources/guides/ mmghomepagecasenotification.html

Questions?