Bela T. Matyas, MD, MPH Health Officer, Solano County
|
|
|
- Herbert Harrell
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Bela T. Matyas, MD, MPH Health Officer, Solano County
2 Electronic submission of community health and other public health data From EMRs, labs, point-of-use devices and other relevant sources To inform community health and public health programs Access to these data (de-identified and/or aggregate, as appropriate) for healthcare providers, academics and the general public Personal data submission, as appropriate Avatars to inform personal health
3 Statutory Reportable Conditions, Title 17 Syndrome Surveillance data Reportable data under Meaningful Use Vital Statistics Community Health Indicator data Needs Assessment data Public Health Nursing and case management data Jurisdiction-specific data Clinical data for jurisdiction clients
4 First, leverage Meaningful Use For Syndrome Surveillance, Immunization, ELR data For special registries Then, expand to Statutory Reporting Title 17, Health & Safety Code, local requirements Ultimately, electronic morbidity reporting Finally, expand to Community Health Indicator Data Access to data vs. Use of data Solano approach: the Hub
5 Maximum ease for data sources; single pipeline Router vs. database (transmission, not storage) Accept data from all source EHRs Data QA and universal data mapping at Hub Route data to any destination Maximum flexibility Maximum scalability Standard, not custom; software-as-a-service Long-term value (indefinite timeframe) Able to share data with partners
6 All public health data flow to hub, which both translates data (QA) and routes to destinations including CDPH HIE Gateway Subscription Software as a Service model Data available in the cloud or a local copy under the governance of local public health and its partners, or both Allows jurisdiction to focus on internal needs with a single feed from healthcare Allows healthcare to focus on collaboration
7 Hospital A Other Jurisdictions Regional/Statewide CDC/ASTHO BioSense 2.0 CDPH HIE Gateway CA CAIR CA CalREDIE CA Cancer Registry CA Lead / RASSCLE Hospital B Provider I The Hub Local PHA Router Solano Cloud Copy Provider II Regional HIO Private HIO DOD, VA Solano Hub (Internal)
8 Single Provider Practice, Clinic Provider Network, Hospital Enterprise HIE Vendor-Based HIE Payer-Based HIE Regional HIE Population and Public Health Hub State and Regional Systems Solano Internal Hub Orders Quest / Clinical Labs Results DOD, VA, Tribal ACKs, Feedback & Data Provenance
9 Health System Clinical EMR Hospital Provider Network Population and Public Health Hub Solano Internal Hub Behavioral EMR FQHC, DOD & VA Individual Practice HIE Interface (optional) Master Patient Master Provider LIMS Environmental Health Clinical Laboratory POU Diagnostics Public Health ACKs, Feedback & Data Provenance
10 SDIR Imperial Health System CAIR Hospital Provider Network Population and Public Health Hub Immunization Cancer Case RIDE Other States Regional Reg FQHC, DOD & VA Individual Practice Clinical Laboratory Public Health HIE Interface (optional) Electronic Lab Reporting Childhood Lead Syndrome Surveillance SD webvcmr CDPH CalREDIE Others RASSCLE HMS EpiCenter Collaborate.org Others CDC BioSense JH ESSENCE ACKs, Feedback & Data Provenance
11 Immunizations Community (Aggregate) Syndrome Surv ELR POU Dx 911 Dispatch Amb Run Data Population and Public Health Hub Policy / Governance Access / Rights Cloud & Desktop Toolkits Regional & Healthcare (De- & Un- Identified) Local Public Health (PHI, De- & Un- Identified) Environ Data ACKs, Feedback & Data Provenance
12 To LHD Access to all public health data Reduced data entry, more analysis To Partners One data pipeline; reduced reporting costs Collaborate.org site, data visualization To State Clean, consistent reporting; fewer connections
13 Exposure monitoring Ebola Measles All Conditions Spreadsheets and Access databases Data from many sources the hub has many EMR, Lab, POU diagnostics, Vital measurements, Clinics, Physicians, Individuals Health Evaluation Assessment and Tracking H.E.A.T. - collaboratively developed in 3 weeks Customizations by CD and EPI staff no IT Individual monitoring can convert to clinical cases
14
15 Financial incentive to EPs and EHs Access to SS (encounter), ELR and Imm n data Address policy and legal (e.g. BAA) issues Build partnerships Build data highway and, via Hub, QA and routing capacity Capture most hospitals and clinics, many providers
16 Title 17, Health & Safety Code, Local requirements Expand partners to all hospitals, clinics, providers Expand data from partners Encounter data & ELR for suspect cases EMR data Data on locally-required reporting (e.g. flu, animal bites) Can expand to cancer and childhood lead data Can expand to electronic morbidity reporting Uses the same data highway and Hub
17 Can use same data highway and Hub to capture broader data Relies heavily on partnerships Reporting of these data voluntary Collaboration site provides value to reporting partners Need BAA, thoughtful consideration of whether data are patient-identifiable, de-identified, or aggregate Seek broader EMR and encounter (beyond SS) data Demographics height, weight, veteran status, etc. Risk Factors smoking, BMI, blood pressure, etc. Diagnoses asthma, diabetes, hypertension, etc.
18 Can supplement with point-of-use diagnostic data Can supplement with data from non-clinical data sets: finance, census, OSHPD, environmental, etc. Allows richer analysis, sharing of data with partners/public: Layered GIS maps Customized views (e.g. catchment area, neighborhood) Risk factor vs. disease maps (e.g. SES vs. diabetes) Identification of cultural and linguistic health disparities More accurate estimates of disease (e.g. diabetes in Solano) Useful for: Whole Person Care Initiative, tracking chronic diseases, Community Health Assessments, understanding community health, evaluation of interventions, etc.
19 LHDs can sometimes default to CDPH solutions For MU ELR and Immunization data, Not for SS data For cancer and childhood lead data Likely, in time, For Title 17 and electronic morbidity Not for timely community health indicator data Not for encounter data or for local expanded data Solano County working with UC and Cancer Registry Consortium to define common data sets for risk factors, demographics, social determinants of health and health indicators: useful for all programs Solano Co. working with DOD & VA on data sharing
MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 2015 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY
MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 2015 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS EPs must meet or qualify for an exclusion to 17 core objectives EPs must meet 3 of the 6 menu measures.
Presented by. Terri Gonzalez Director of Practice Improvement North Carolina Medical Society
Presented by Terri Gonzalez Director of Practice Improvement North Carolina Medical Society Meaningful Use is using certified EHR technology to: Improve quality, safety, efficiency, and reduce errors Engage
STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE CORE AND MENU MEASURES FOR ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONALS
STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE CORE AND MENU MEASURES FOR ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONALS CORE MEASURES must meet all CPOE for Medication, Laboratory and Radiology Orders Objective: Use computerized provider order entry
ARRA HITECH Meaningful Use Objectives & Implications to Public Health Lab
ARRA HITECH Meaningful Use Objectives & Implications to Public Health Lab For APHL Annual Meeting June 2011 By Wes Kennemore, APHL and Jennifer McGehee, CDC DISCLAIMER This presentation was supported by
Meaningful Use. Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Meaningful Use Medicare and Medicaid Table of Contents What is Meaningful Use?... 1 Table 1: Patient Benefits... 2 What is an EP?... 4 How are Registration and Attestation Being Handled?... 5 What are
Meaningful Use Updates Stage 2 and 3. Julia Moore, Business Analyst SMC Partners, LLC July 8, 2015
Meaningful Use Updates Stage 2 and 3 Julia Moore, Business Analyst SMC Partners, LLC July 8, 2015 Stage 2 Requirements 2015 EPs beyond 1st year of MU must report on a full year of data EPs in 1 st year
Overview of Vital Records and Public Health Informatics in CDPH
Overview of Vital Records and Public Health Informatics in CDPH Este Geraghty, MD, MS, MPH/CPH, FACP, GISP Deputy Director, Center for Health Statistics and Informatics California Department of Public
Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012
Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012 CORE OBJECTIVES (17 total) Stage 1 Objective Stage 1 Measure Stage 2 Objective Stage 2 Measure Use CPOE for medication
Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison for Eligible Professionals
Stage 1 vs. Comparison for Eligible Professionals CORE OBJECTIVES (17 Total) Stage 1 Objective Stage 1 Measure Objective Measure Use CPOE for Medication orders directly entered by any licensed healthcare
Planning for Health Information Technology and Exchange in Public Health
Planning for Health Information Technology and Exchange in Public Health UC Davis Health Informatics 2009 Seminar Series Linette T Scott, MD, MPH Deputy Director, Health Information and Strategic Planning
STAGES 1 AND 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1
STAGES 1 AND 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1 Requirement CPOE Use CPOE for medication orders directly entered by any licensed health care professional who can enter orders into the
MEETING MEANINGFUL USE IN MICROMD -STAGE TWO- Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist
MEETING MEANINGFUL USE IN MICROMD -STAGE TWO- Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist 1 Proposed Rule On April 15, 2015 CMS Issued a new proposal rule for the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive
Meaningful Use - The Basics
Meaningful Use - The Basics Presented by PaperFree Florida 1 Topics Meaningful Use Stage 1 Meaningful Use Barriers: Observations from the field Help and Questions 2 What is Meaningful Use Meaningful Use
Meaningful Use Stage 1:
Whitepaper Meaningful Use Stage 1: EHR Incentive Program Information -------------------------------------------------------------- Daw Systems, Inc. UPDATED: November 2012 This document is designed to
Meaningful Use Objectives
Meaningful Use Objectives The purpose of the electronic health records (EHR) incentive program is not so much the adoption of health information technology (HIT), but rather how HIT can further the goals
Achieving Meaningful Use with Centricity EMR
GE Healthcare Achieving Meaningful Use with Centricity EMR Are you Ready to Report? GE Healthcare EMR Consulting CHUG Fall Conference October 2010 Achieving Meaningful Use with Centricity EMR The EMR Consulting
Michigan Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Update Jason Werner - MDCH
Michigan Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Update Jason Werner - MDCH Program Timeline Meaningful Use Timeline Meaningful Use Stages st year 0 0 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 00 0 0 AIU $,50 3 TBD TBD TBD TBD 0 AIU
MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY
MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY On August 24, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) posted the much anticipated final rule for Stage
STAGE 2 of the EHR Incentive Programs
EHR Incentive Programs A program administered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Eligible Professional s Guide to STAGE 2 of the EHR Incentive Programs September 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS...
Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Last Updated: August, 2012
CORE OBJECTIVES (16 total) Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Last Updated: August, 2012 Stage 1 Objective Use CPOE for medication orders directly entered by any licensed
Understanding Meaningful Use. Review of Part 1 and Part 2
Understanding Meaningful Use Review of Part 1 and Part 2 Understanding Meaningful Use Pat Wise RN, MA, MS, FHIMSS COL (USA ret'd) Vice President, Healthcare Information Systems Meaningful Use Financial
Contact Information: West Texas Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center 3601 4 th Street MS 6232 Lubbock, Texas 79424 806-743-1338
Contact Information: West Texas Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center 3601 4 th Street MS 6232 Lubbock, Texas 79424 806-743-1338 http://www.wtxhitrec.org/ Grant award - $6.6m Total number
Meaningful Use in 2015 and Beyond Changes for Stage 2
Meaningful Use in 2015 and Beyond Changes for Stage 2 Jennifer Boaz Transformation Support Specialist Proprietary 1 Definitions AIU = Adopt, Implement or Upgrade EP = Eligible Professional API = Application
Stage 2 Final Rule Overview: Updates to Stage 1 and New Stage 2 Requirements
Stage 2 Final Rule Overview: Updates to Stage 1 and New Stage 2 Requirements The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued the Stage 2 Final Rule on September 4, 2012. The Stage 2 Final Rule
LIS Vendor Landscape and Options for Meeting ELR Meaningful Use
White Paper LIS Vendor Landscape and Options for Meeting ELR Meaningful Use January, 2012 Developed by the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) and the Centers for Disease Control and
0 What is Meaningful Use and where are we? 0 What is the Physician Quality Reporting System and where stage are we on?
Outline 0 What is Meaningful Use and where are we? 0 What is the Physician Quality Reporting System and where stage are we on? 0 How can we leverage the EMR to demonstrate the quality of our care? Meaningful
VIII. Dentist Crosswalk
Page 27 VIII. Dentist Crosswalk Overview The final rule on meaningful use requires that an Eligible Professional (EP) report on both clinical quality measures and functional objectives and measures. While
The HITECH Act and Meaningful Use Implications for Population and Public Health
The HITECH Act and Meaningful Use Implications for Population and Public Health Bill Brand, MPH Public Health Informatics Institute Meaningful Use for Public Health Professionals: Basic Training May 16,
Core Set of Objectives and Measures Must Meet All 15 Measures Stage 1 Objectives Stage 1 Measures Reporting Method
Core Set of Objectives and Measures Must Meet All 15 Measures Stage 1 Objectives Stage 1 Measures Reporting Method Use Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) for medication orders directly entered by
Achieving Meaningful Use Training Manual
Achieving Meaningful Use Training Manual Terms EP Eligible Professional Medicare Eligible Professional o Doctor of Medicine or Osteopathy o Doctor of Dental Surgery or Dental Medicine o Doctor of Podiatric
Stage 2 Meaningful Use What the Future Holds. Lindsey Wiley, MHA HIT Manager Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality
Stage 2 Meaningful Use What the Future Holds Lindsey Wiley, MHA HIT Manager Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality An Important Reminder For audio, you must use your phone: Step 1: Call (866) 906-0123.
Proposed Rule for Meaningful Use Stage 2
Proposed Rule for Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Old The Changes The New Continuing Medical Education Disclaimer hi i if h i i S d Ch i This is to certify that Marnivia Spencer and Chris Hudson have disclosed
Meaningful Use Stage 2
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Presented by: Sarah Leake, HTS Consultant HTS, a division of Mountain Pacific Quality Health Foundation 1 HTS Who We Are Stage 2 MU Overview Learning Objectives 2014 CEHRT Certification
MEANINGFUL USE and POPULATION HEALTH
MEANINGFUL USE and POPULATION HEALTH Seth Foldy, MD MPH FAAFP Director, Public Health Informatics and Technology Program Office NCVHS November 15, 2011 Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory
Meaningful Use Qualification Plan
Meaningful Use Qualification Plan Overview Certified EHR technology used in a meaningful way is one piece of a broader Health Information Technology infrastructure intended to reform the health care system
Meaningful Use 2015 and beyond. Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist
Meaningful Use 2015 and beyond Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist 1 Agenda A look at the CMS Website Finding your EMR version Certification Number Proposed Rule by the Centers for Medicare
Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Hospitals and Eligible Professionals (EPs)
Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible and Eligible Professionals (EPs) Under the Electronic Health Record (EHR) meaningful use final rules established by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS),
Meaningful Use Updates. HIT Summit September 19, 2015
Meaningful Use Updates HIT Summit September 19, 2015 Meaningful Use Updates Nadine Owen, BS,CHTS-IS, CHTS-IM Health IT Analyst Hawaii Health Information Exchange No other relevant financial disclosures.
Meaningful Use and Lab Related Requirements
Meaningful Use and Lab Related Requirements ONC State HIE / NILA Workgroup August 20, 2013 What is an EHR? Electronic Health Record Information system used by healthcare providers to store and manage patient
Enabling Patients Decision Making Power: A Meaningful Use Outcome. Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality
Enabling Patients Decision Making Power: A Meaningful Use Outcome Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality Today 1. Meaningful Use (MU) 2. 2/3rds of MU relates
Incentives to Accelerate EHR Adoption
Incentives to Accelerate EHR Adoption The passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 provides incentives for eligible professionals (EPs) to adopt and use electronic health records
EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Objectives Summary CORE OBJECTIVES (You must meet all objectives unless exclusion applies.)
EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Objectives Summary CORE OBJECTIVES (You must meet all objectives unless exclusion applies.) TARGETING CANCER CARE Objective Objective Description Measure/Attestation Requirement
The EP/eligible hospital has enabled this functionality. At least 80% of all unique patients. seen by the EP or admitted to the
EMR Name/Model EMR Vendor Allscripts Stage 1 objectives Eligible professionals Hospitals Use CPOE Use of CPOE for orders (any type) directly entered by authorizing provider (for example, MD, DO, RN, PA,
Meaningful Use: Stage 1 and 2 Hospitals (EH) and Providers (EP) Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality
Meaningful Use: Stage 1 and 2 Hospitals (EH) and Providers (EP) Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality Meaningful Use Stage 1 Focuses on Functional & Interoperability
Meaningful Use Stage 1 and Public Health: Lesson Learned
Meaningful Use Stage 1 and Public Health: Lesson Learned NAACR Presentation August 16, 2012 James Daniel, MPH Public Health Coordinator Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT Agenda Overview
Summary of the Proposed Rule for the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program (Eligible Professionals only)
Summary of the Proposed Rule for the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program (Eligible Professionals only) Background Enacted on February 17, 2009, the American Recovery
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs- Past, Present, & Future. Travis Broome, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 12/18/2012
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs- Past, Present, & Future Travis Broome, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 12/18/2012 Medicare-only Eligible Professionals Medicaid-only Eligible Professionals
Meaningful Use Cheat Sheet CORE MEASURES: ALL REQUIRED # Measure Exclusions How to Meet in WEBeDoctor
Meaningful Use Cheat Sheet CORE MEASURES: ALL REQUIRED # Measure Exclusions How to Meet in WEBeDoctor 1 CPOE (Computerized Physician Order Entry) More than 30 percent of all unique patients with at least
HCCN Meaningful Use Review. October 7 th, 2015 Louisiana Public Health Institute Kelly Maggiore Jack Millaway
HCCN Meaningful Use Review October 7 th, 2015 Louisiana Public Health Institute Kelly Maggiore Jack Millaway What is Meaningful Use? Federal and State incentive payment program for Eligible Professionals
MDeverywhere, Inc. Presents 2014 CMS EHR Incentive Program Requirements: What Providers Need To Know
MDeverywhere, Inc. Presents 2014 CMS EHR Incentive Program Requirements: What Providers Need To Know Presented by: Kristen Heffernan Director Product Management & Marketing, Henry Schein MicroMD Agenda
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Focus on Stage 2. Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator [email protected]
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Focus on Stage 2 Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator [email protected] Understanding Participation Program Year Program Year January 1 st - December 31st. Year
Lunch and Learn IFAF 09/24/11. Michael L. Brody, DPM
Lunch and Learn IFAF 09/24/11 Michael L. Brody, DPM Disclaimers Sammy Sponsor of this presentation PICA Biomedix All Pro Imaging The Brave New World of HIT Today s Topics: PQRS E-Rx EMR Health Information
Electronic Case Reporting to Public Health An EHR Vendor s Perspective Public Health - EHR Vendors Collaboration Initiative
Electronic Case Reporting to Public Health An EHR Vendor s Perspective Public Health - EHR Vendors Collaboration Initiative June 30, 2015 1 Joint Public Health Forum & CDC Nationwide phconnect Community:
Where to Begin? Auditing the Current EHR System
Chapter 1 Where to Begin? Auditing the Current EHR System After implementation, allow for a period of stabilization, so physicians and employees can gain more comfort using the electronic health record
Overview of MU Stage 2 Joel White, Health IT Now
Overview of MU Stage 2 Joel White, Health IT Now 1 Agenda 1. Introduction 2. Context 3. Adoption Rates of HIT 4. Overview of Stage 2 Rules 5. Overview of Issues 6. Trend in Standards: Recommendations v.
Agenda. What is Meaningful Use? Stage 2 - Meaningful Use Core Set. Stage 2 - Menu Set. Clinical Quality Measures (CQM) Clinical Considerations
AQAF Health Information Technology Forum Meaningful Use Stage 2 Clinical Considerations Marla Clinkscales & Mike Bice Alabama Regional Extension Center (ALREC) August 13, 2013 0 Agenda What is Meaningful
EHR Incentive Program Stage 3 Objectives & Measures Crosswalk of Stage 3 Proposed Objectives, Measures & Corresponding Stage 2 Measures
EHR Incentive Program Stage 3 Objectives & Measures Crosswalk of Stage 3 Proposed Objectives, Measures & Corresponding Stage 2 Measures Objective 1: Protect Patient Health Information Measures: 1 (Complete
Introduction to Public Health Informatics and their Applications
Introduction to Public Health Informatics and their Applications August 27, 2015 Francis B Annor Georgia Department of Public Health Learning Objectives By the end of this presentation, participants will
Of EHRs and Meaningful Use. Pat Wise, RN, MA, MS FHIMSS COL (USA ret d) VP, Healthcare Information Systems, HIMSS
Of EHRs and Meaningful Use Pat Wise, RN, MA, MS FHIMSS COL (USA ret d) VP, Healthcare Information Systems, HIMSS 1 MU: Where We are Today From www.cms.gov As of the end of January 31, 2013: >210,000 EPs
Public Health Reporting Initiative Functional Requirements Description
Public Health Reporting Initiative Functional Requirements Description 9/25/2012 1 Table of Contents 1.0 Preface and Introduction... 2 2.0 Initiative Overview... 3 2.1 Initiative Challenge Statement...
TABLE 4: STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE OBJECTIVES AND ASSOCIATED MEASURES SORTED BY CORE AND MENU SET
CMS-0044-P 156 TABLE 4: STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE OBJECTIVES AND ASSOCIATED MEASURES SORTED BY CORE AND MENU SET Improving quality, safety, efficiency, and reducing health disparities Use computerized provider
Medicare and Medicaid Programs; EHR Incentive Programs
Medicare and Medicaid Programs; EHR Incentive Programs Background The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 establishes incentive payments under the Medicare and Medicaid programs for certain
Understanding Meaningful Use Stage 2
Understanding Meaningful Use Stage 2 Miranda Ladue, Manager, Product Management Adam Plotts, Manager, Product Management Copyright 2011 Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. Agenda Review MU Timeline MU
Stage 1 Meaningful Use - Attestation Worksheet: Core Measures
Stage 1 Meaningful Use - Attestation Worksheet: Core Measures Core Measures Objective # Objective Title / Explanation Goal Attestation Response - Values below reflect reponses of most radiologists Explanation
EMR Name/ Model. Cerner PowerChart Ambulatory (PowerWorks ASP)
EMR Name/ Model EMR Vendor Cerner PowerChart Ambulatory (PowerWorks ASP) Cerner Corporation Core Set of Measures 1 Use CPOE for medication orders directly entered by any licensed healthcare professional
Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program. Stage 2 Final Rule Update Part 2
Office of Medical Assistance Programs Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule Update Part 2 November 7, 2012 Medical Assistance HIT Initiative 1 Office of Medical Assistance
Stage 1 measures. The EP/eligible hospital has enabled this functionality
EMR Name/Model EMR Vendor Epic Epic Stage 1 objectives Use CPOE Use of CPOE for orders (any type) directly entered by authorizing provider (for example, MD, DO, RN, PA, NP) Stage 1 measures For EPs, CPOE