Syncope Approach Diagnosis and Treatment Robert Satran MD
Transient Loss of Consciousness (TLOC)
Transient Loss of Consciousness (TLOC ) Classification Underlying Mechanism Is Transient Global Cerebral Hypoperfusion. Real or Apparent TLOC Syncope Neurally-mediated reflex syndromes Orthostatic hypotension Cardiac arrhythmias Structural cardiovascular disease Disorders Mimicking Syncope With loss of consciousness, i.e. seizure disorders, concussion Without loss of consciousness, psychogenic pseudo-syncope Brignole M, et al. Europace, 2004;. 6:467-537
Syncope A Symptom, Not a Diagnosis Self-limited loss of consciousness and postural tone Relatively rapid onset Variable warning symptoms Spontaneous, complete, and usually prompt recovery without medical or surgical intervention Brignole M, et al. Europace, 2004;. 6:467-537
Etiology, Prevalence, Impact
Causes of True Syncope Neurally- Mediated Orthostatic Cardiac Arrhythmia Structural Cardio- Pulmonary VVS CSS Situational Cough Post-Micturition Drug-Induced ANS Failure Primary Secondary Brady SN Dysfunction AV Block Tachy VT SVT Long QT Syndrome Acute MI Aortic Stenosis HCM Pulmonary HTN Aortic Dissection
Syncope Mimics Acute intoxication (e.g., alcohol) Seizures Sleep disorders Somatization disorder (psychogenic pseudo-syncope) Trauma/ concussion Hypoglycemia Hyperventilation Brignole M, et al. Europace, 2004;. 6:467-537
Impact of Syncope 1. Kenny RA, Kapoor W N. In: Benditt D, et al. eds. The Evaluation and Treatment of Syncope. Futura;. 2003:23-27 2. Kapoor W. M edicine. 1990;. 69:160-175 3. Brignole M, et al. Europace. 2003;. 5:293-298 4. Blanc J-J, et al. Eur Heart J. 2002;. 23:815-820 5. Campbell A, et al. A ge and A geing. 1981;. 10:264-270
Impact of Syncope: US Trends 000( s) Emergency Department Visits* 000( s( Hospital Outpatient Visits* 900 80 800 70 60 700 50 600 40 + 500 30 *Syncope and collapse (ICD-9 Code:780.2) listed as primary reason for visit. NHAMCS. 2002 96 ' 97 ' 98 ' 99 ' 00 ' 01 ' 02'
%Prevalence Quality of Life : UK Population Norms vs. Syncope Patients 50 UK Population Norms Patients with Syncope 49 38 37 36 43 25 26 13 19 3 4 9 0 Mobility 1 Self-Care Rose M, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;. 53:1209-1216
Syncope Mortality Low mortality vs. high mortality Neurally-mediated syncope vs. syncope with a cardiac cause Soteriades ES, Evans JC, Larson MG, et al. Incidence and prognosis of syncope. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(12):878-885. [Framingham Study Population]
Syncope and Driving a Vehicle Those who drive and have recurrent syncope risk their lives and the lives of others Places considerable burden on the physician Essential to know local laws and physician responsibilities Some states Invasion of privacy to notify motor vehicle department* Other states Reporting is mandatory* If the patient has sufficient warning of impending syncope Driving may be permitted
Diagnosis
Diagnostic Objectives Distinguish true syncope from syncope mimics Determine presence of heart disease Establish the cause of syncope with sufficient certainty to: Assess prognosis confidently Initiate effective preventive treatment
A Diagnostic Plan is Essential Initial Examination Detailed patient history Physical exam ECG Supine and upright blood pressure Monitoring Holter Event Insertable Loop Recorder (ILR) Cardiac Imaging Special Investigations Head-up tilt test Hemodynamics Electrophysiology study
Diagnostic Flow Diagram for TLOC
Initial Exam: Detailed Patient History Circumstances of recent event Eyewitness account of event Symptoms at onset of event Sequelae Medications Circumstances of more remote events Concomitant disease, especially cardiac Pertinent family history Cardiac disease Sudden death Metabolic disorders Past medical history Neurological history Syncope
Initial Exam: Thorough Physical Vital signs Heart rate Orthostatic blood pressure change Cardiovascular exam: Is heart disease present? ECG: Long QT, pre-excitation, conduction system disease Echo: LV function, valve status, HCM Neurological exam Carotid sinus massage Perform under clinically appropriate conditions preferably during head-up tilt test Monitor both ECG and BP Brignole M, et al. Europace, 2004;. 6:467-537
Carotid Sinus Massage (CSM( Method 1 Massage, 5-10 seconds Don t occlude Absolute contraindications 2 Carotid bruit, known significant carotid arterial disease, previous CVA, MI last 3 months Supine and upright posture (on tilt table) Outcome 3second asystole and/ or 50 mmhg fall in systolic BP with reproduction of symptoms = Carotid Sinus Syndrome Complications 3 Primarily neurological Less than 0.2% Usually transient 1Kenny RA. Heart. 2000;. 83:564 2Linzer M. A nn Intern M ed. 1997;. 126:989 3Munro N, et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;. 42:1248-1251
Other Diagnostic Tests Ambulatory ECG Holter monitoring Event recorder Intermittent vs. Loop Insertable Loop Recorder (ILR) Head-Up Tilt (HUT) Includes drug provocation (NTG, isoproterenol( Carotid Sinus Massage (CSM( Adenosine Triphosphate Test (ATP( Electrophysiology Study (EPS( Brignole M, et al. Europace, 2004;. 6:467-537
Diagnostic Assessment: Yields Initial Evaluation Yield )%( History, Physical Exam, ECG, Cardiac Massage Other Tests/Procedures 38-40 Head-Up Tilt Test 27 External Cardiac Monitoring 5-13 Insertable Loop Recorder (ILR( 43 EP Study 2-5 < Exercise Test 0.5 EEG 0.3-0.5 MRI NA
Neurological Tests : Rarely Diagnostic for Syncope EEG, Head CT, Head MRI May help diagnose seizure Brignole M, et al. Europace, 2004;. 6:467-537
Head-Up Tilt Test (HUT( Protocols vary Useful as diagnostic adjunct in atypical syncope cases Useful in teaching patients to recognize prodromal symptoms Not useful in assessing treatment Brignole M, et al. Europace, 2004;. 6:467-537
Head-Up Tilt Test: ECG Leads and Intra-Arterial Pressure Tracing 2 1
Insertable Loop Recorder (ILR(
Insertable Loop Recorder (ILR( The ILR is an implantable patient and automatically activated monitoring system that records subcutaneous ECG. Indicated for: Patients with clinical syndromes or situations at increased risk of cardiac arrhythmias Patients who experience transient symptoms that may suggest a cardiac arrhythmia
Specific Conditions and Treatment
Specific Conditions Cardiac arrhythmia Brady/ Tachy Long QT syndrome Torsade de pointes Brugada Drug-induced Structural cardio-pulmonary Neurally-mediated Vasovagal Syncope (VVS( Carotid Sinus Syndrome (CSS( Orthostatic
Cardiac Syncope Includes cardiac arrhythmias and SHD Often life-threatening May be warning of critical CV disease Tachy and brady arrhythmias Myocardial ischemia, aortic stenosis, pulmonary hypertension, aortic dissection Assess culprit arrhythmia or structural abnormality aggressively Initiate treatment promptly Brignole M, et al. Europace, 2004;. 6:467-537
Cardiac Syncope. A Harbinger of Sudden Death. Survival with and without syncope -6month mortality rate > 10% Cardiac syncope doubled risk of death Includes cardiac arrhythmias and SHD Soteriades ES, et al. N Engl J M ed. 2002;. 347:878
Syncope d/t Structural Cardiovascular Disease Acute MI/ Ischemia 2 neural reflex bradycardia Vasodilatation, arrhythmias, low output (rare( Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Limited output during exertion (increased obstruction, greater demand), arrhythmias, neural reflex Acute aortic dissection Neural reflex mechanism, pericardial tamponade
Syncope d/t Structural Cardiovascular Disease Pulmonary embolism/ pulmonary HTN Neural reflex, inadequate flow with exertion Valvular abnormalities Aortic stenosis Limited output, neural reflex dilation in periphery Mitral stenosis, atrial myxoma Obstruction to adequate flow
Syncope d/t Cardiac Arrhythmias Bradyarrhythmias Sinus arrest, exit block High grade or acute complete AV block Can be accompanied by vasodilatation (VVS, CSS( Tachyarrhythmias Atrial fibrillation/ flutter with rapid ventricular rate )eg, pre-excitation syndrome( Paroxysmal SVT or VT Torsade de pointes Brignole M, et al. Europace, 2004;. 6:467-537
ILR Recordings CASE: 83 year-old woman with syncope due to bradycardia : Pacemaker implanted. CASE: 27 year-old man presents to ER multiple times after falls resulting in trauma. VT: Ablated and medicated.
Cardiac Rhythms During Unexplained Syncope Arrhythmia 21% ) 13-32%( Bradycardia 15% ) 11-21%( No Recurrence 36% ) 31-48%( Tachycardia 6% ) 2-11%( Other 11% Normal Sinus Rhythm 31% ) 17-44%( Seidl K. Europace. 2000;2(3):. 256-262 Krahn A D. PA CE. 2002;. 25:37-41
Long QT Syndromes Mechanism Abnormalities of sodium and/ or potassium channels Susceptibility to polymorphic VT (Torsade de pointes( Prevalence Drug-induced forms Common Genetic forms Relatively rare, but increasingly being recognized Concealed forms : May be common Provide basis for drug-induced torsade Schwartz P, Priori S. In: Zipes D and Jalife J, eds. Cardiac Electrophysiology. Saunders;. 2004:651-659
Syncope: Torsade de Pointes
Drug-Induced QT Prolongation Antiarrhythmics Antibiotics Class IA...Quinidine, Procainamide, Disopyramide Class III Sotalol, Amiodarone Psychoactive Agents Phenothiazines, Amitriptyline, Imipramine, Ziprasidone Erythromycin, Pentamidine, Fluconazole, Ciprofloxacin and its relatives Nonsedating antihistamines Others Terfenadine*, Astemizole Cisapride*, Droperidol, Haloperidol List is continuously being updated
Treatment of Long QT Suspicion and recognition are critical Emergency treatment Intravenous magnesium Pacing to overcome bradycardia or pauses Isoproterenol to increase heart rate and shorten repolarization ICD if prior SCA or strong family history If drug induced : Reverse bradycardia Withdraw drug Avoid ALL long-qt provoking agents If genetic: Avoid ALL long-qt provoking agents For more information visit www.longqt.org Schwartz P, Priori S. In: Zipes D and Jalife J, eds. Cardiac Electrophysiology. Saunders;. 2004:651-659
ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update. Circ. 2002;. 106:2145-2161 Treatment of Syncope Due to Bradyarrhythmia Class I indication for pacing using dual chamber system wherever possible Ventricular pacing in atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular response
Treatment of Syncope Due to Tachyarrhythmia Atrial tachyarrhythmia AVRT due to accessory pathway Ablate pathway AVNRT Ablate AV nodal slow pathway Atrial fib Pacing, linear/ focal ablation for paroxysmal AF Atrial flutter Ablate the IVC-TV isthmus of the re-entrant circuit for typical flutter Ventricular tachyarrhythmia Ventricular tachycardia ICD or ablation where appropriate Torsade de pointes Withdraw offending drug or implant ICD (long QT/ Brugada/ short QT) Drug therapy may be an alternative in many cases
Neurally-Mediated Reflex Syncope Vasovagal Syncope (VVS) Carotid Sinus Syndrome (CSS) Situational syncope Post-micturition Cough Swallow Defecation Blood drawing, etc. Brignole M, et al. Europace, 2004;. 6:467-537
Pathophysiology Autonomic Nervous System
VVS Clinical Pathophysiology Neurally-mediated physiologic reflex mechanism with two components:. 1Cardioinhibitory ( HR (. 2Vasodepressor ( BP) despite heart beats, no significant BP generated Both components are usually present 2 1 Wieling W, et al. In: Benditt D, et al. The Evaluation and Treatment of Syncope. Futura. 2003;. 11-22
VVS Incidence Most common form of syncope 8%to 37% (mean 18%) of syncope cases Depends on population sampled Young without SHD, incidence Older with SHD, incidence Linzer M, et al. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:989.
VVS vs. CSS In general: VVS patients younger than CSS patients Ages range from adolescence to older adults )median 43 years( Linzer M, et al. Ann Intern Med. 1997;. 126:989
Total Number of Syncopal Episodes VVS Recurrences 35%of patients report syncope recurrence during follow-up 3 years 1 Positive HUT with >6 lifetime syncope episodes: recurrence risk >50% over 2 years 2 1000 800 Two Year Risk 75% > 100 50 25 8 4 2 1 50-75% 25-50% 25% < 1 2 3 6 24 84 480 Months Since Symptoms Began 1Savage D, et al. STROKE. 1985;16:626-29. 2Sheldon R, et al. Circulation. 1996;93:973-81.
VVS Diagnosis History and physical exam, ECG and BP Head-Up Tilt (HUT) Protocol : Fast > 2 hours ECG and continuous blood pressure, supine, and upright Tilt to 70, 20 minutes Isoproterenol/ Nitroglycerin if necessary End point Loss of consciousness Benditt D, et al. JA CC. 1996;. 28:263-275 Brignole M, et al. Europace, 2004;. 6:467-537
VVS General Treatment Measures Optimal treatment strategies for VVS are a source of debate Long-term prevention Tilt training Treatment goals Education Acute intervention Diet, fluids, salt Physical maneuvers, eg, crossing legs or tugging arms Lowering head Support hose Drug therapy Pacing Lying down
VVS Tilt Training Protocol Objectives Enhance orthostatic tolerance Diminish excessive autonomic reflex activity Reduce syncope susceptibility/ recurrences Technique Prescribed periods of upright posture against a wall Start with 3-5 min BID Increase by 5 min each week until a duration of 30min is achieved Reybrouck T, et al. PACE. 2000;23(4 Pt. 1):. 493-498
VVS Tilt Training: Clinical Outcomes Treatment of recurrent VVS Reybrouck, et al.*: Long-term study 38patients performed home tilt training After a period of regular tilt training, 82% remained free of syncope during the follow-up period However, at the 43-month follow-up, 29 patients had abandoned the therapy Conclusion: The abnormal autonomic reflex activity of VVS can be remedied. Compliance may be an issue. *Reybrouck T, et al. PACE. 2000;. 23:493-498
VVS Tilt Training: Clinical Outcomes Foglia-Manzillo, et al.*: Short-term study 68patients 35tilt training 33no treatment (control( Tilt table test conducted after 3 weeks ) 59%( 19of tilt trained and 18 (60%) of controls had a positive test Tilt training was not effective in reducing tilt testing positivity rate Poor compliance in the majority of patients with recurrent VVS *Foglio-Manzillo G, et al. Europace. 2004;. 6:199-204
VVS Pharmacologic Treatment Fludrocortisone Beta-adrenergic blockers Clinical evidence suggests minimal benefit 1 SSRI (Selective Serotonin Re-Uptake Inhibitor( 1small controlled trial 2 Vasoconstrictors 1negative controlled trial (etilefrine) 3 2positive controlled trials (midodrine) 4,5 1Brignole M, et al. Europace, 2004;. 6:467-537 2Di Girolamo E, et al. JA CC. 1999;. 33:1227-1230 3Raviele A, et al. Circ. 1999;. 99:1452-1457 4Ward C, et al. Heart. 1998;. 79:45-49 5Perez-Lugones A, et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol.. 935-938:)8(12;2001
Symptom-Free Interval Midodrine for VVS 100 80 60 Midodrine Fluid 40 20 p < 0.001 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Months Perez-Lugones A, Schweikert R, Pavia S, et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001;12(8):935-938.
The Role of Pacing as Therapy for Syncope VVS with +HUT and cardioinhibitory response: Class IIb indication for pacing Three randomized, prospective trials reported benefits of pacing in select VVS patients: VPS I 1 VASIS 2 SYDIT 3 Subsequent study results less clear VPS II 4 Synpace 5 INVASY 6 1Connolly SJ. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;. 33:16-20 2Sutton R. Circulation. 2000;. 102:294-299 3Ammirati F. Circ. 2001;. 104:52-57 4Connolly S. JA M A. 2003;. 289:2224-2229 5Giada F. PACE. 2003;26:1016 (abstract.) 6Occhetta E, et al. Europace. 2004;. 6:538-547
VPS I )North American Vasovagal Pacemaker Study( Objective: To evaluate pacemaker therapy for severe recurrent vasovagal syncope Randomized, prospective, single center N=54 patients : 27DDD pacemaker with rate drop response : 27No pacemaker Inclusion: Vasodepressor response Primary outcome: First recurrence of syncope Connolly SJ. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;. 33:16-20
Cumulative Risk )%( VPS I )North American Vasovagal Pacemaker Study( 100 90 80 70 No Pacemaker (PM) 60 50 P=0.000022 40 30 20 Pacemaker 10 0 0 3 6 9 12 15 Time in Months Results: ) 22%( 6with PM had recurrence vs. 19 (70%) without PM 84%RRR (p=) 0.000022 Connolly SJ. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;. 33:16-20
%Syncope-Free SYNPACE )Vasovagal SYNcope and PACing ( 1.0 0.9 0.8 p=0.58 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 Pacemaker OFF Pacemaker ON 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Days Since Randomization Results: 50% with pacing ON had recurrence vs. 38% with pacing OFF )not statistically significant( Raviele A, et al. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:1741-1748.
CSS Carotid Sinus Syndrome Syncope clearly associated with carotid sinus stimulation is rare ( 1% of syncope ( CSS may be an important cause of unexplained syncope/ falls in older individuals Prevalence higher than previously believed Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity (CSH ( No symptoms No treatment Kenny RA, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;. 38:1491-1496 Brignole M, et al. Europace. 2004;. 6:467-537 Sutton R. In: Neurally Mediated Syncope: Pathophysiology, Investigation and Treatment. Blanc JJ, et al. eds. Armonk, NY: Futura;. 1996:138
CSS Etiology Sensory nerve endings in the carotid sinus walls respond to deformation Increased afferent signals to brain stem Reflex increase in efferent vagal activity Decrease of sympathetic tone BRADYCARDIA AND VASODILATATION
Falls: Incidence, Recurrence, CSH* 75 56 1 50% 38 1 30% 2 23% 19 0 Incidence > Age 65 Recurrence CSH* Fallers > Age 50 in ER *Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity 1J A m Geriatr Soc.. 1995 2Richardson D, et al. PA CE. 1997;. 20:820
Orthostatic Hypotension Etiology Etiology Drug-induced (very common( Diuretics Vasodilators Primary autonomic failure Multiple system atrophy Parkinson s Disease Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS( Secondary autonomic failure Diabetes Alcohol Amyloid Brignole M, et al. Europace, 2004;. 6:467-537
Treatment Strategies for Orthostatic Intolerance Patient education, injury avoidance Hydration Fluids, salt, diet Minimize caffeine/ alcohol Sleeping with head of bed elevated Tilt training, leg crossing, arm pull Support hose Drug therapies Fludrocortisone, midodrine, erythropoietin Tachy-Pacing (probably not useful( Brignole M, et al. Europace, 2004;. 6:467-537
Diagnostic Testing in Hospital Strongly Recommended! Suspected/ known significant heart disease ECG abnormalities suggesting potential life-threatening arrhythmia Family history of premature sudden death Syncope during exercise Severe injury or accident Brignole M, et al. Europace. 2004;. 6:467-537
Thank You!