Provider Name (#): Jefferson County Comprehensive Services (0225) Page 1



Similar documents
Date of Report: 09/30/2014 Engagement, Retention and Continuity of Care Measure Status by Level of Care and SFY 2014 Quarter* Level I - Engagement

SFY (#): (0631) 09/30/ SFY14

Date of Report: 09/30/2014 Engagement, Retention and Continuity of Care Measure Status by Level of Care and SFY 2014 Quarter* Quarter 1

2012 (#): (0121) SFY

% of Recovery Home Clients/Length of Stay of At Least 30 Days SFY11 Level Target

The NJSAMS Report. Heroin Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment in New Jersey. In Brief. New Jersey Substance Abuse Monitoring System.

Crosswalk Management System

Crosswalk Management System

Colorado Substance Abuse Treatment Clients with Co-Occurring Disorders, FY05

AN ASSESSMENT OF PUBLICLY FUNDED ALCOHOL AND OTHER DRUG PROGRAMS IN CALIFORNIA Melinda M. Hohman. John D. Clapp

Client Population Statistics

JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROGRAM

Kathryn P. Jett Director

As the proportion of racial/

MAIL: Recovery Center Missoula FAX: Wyoming St. OR ATTN: Admissions Missoula, MT ATTN: Admissions

Pregnant Women Entering Substance Abuse Treatment for the First Time: 10 Year Trends

CHAPTER 3: Patient Admissions to Treatment for Abuse of Alcohol and Drugs in Appalachia,

12 & 12, INC. FY 15 ANNUAL MANAGEMENT REPORT

Recovery Services of Northwest Ohio, Inc.

CCC Hooper Detoxification Stabilization Center. Accessing Services

Application for Free Home Repairs

Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS) Highlights National Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment Services

New Jersey Substance Abuse Monitoring System (NJ-SAMS) Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions 1/1/ /31/2013 Resident of Cape May County

Trends in Adult Female Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions Reporting Primary Alcohol Abuse: 1992 to Alcohol abuse affects millions of

Treatment completion is an

Addiction Severity Index Fifth Edition

Alcohol and Drug Treatment Penetration

Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions for Abuse of Benzodiazepines

HowHow to Identify the Best Stock Broker For You

Sacramento County 2010

Substance Abuse Overview 2013

San Diego County 2010

Thirty-First Judicial District DUI / Drug Court EVALUATION

MONROE COUNTY OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RECOVERY CONNECTION PROJECT PROGRAM EVALUATION DECEMBER 2010

Los Angeles County Department of Health Services Alcohol and Drug Program Administration

Special Treatment/Recovery Programs -- Participant Demographics

Drug Use, Testing, and Treatment in Jails By Doris James Wilson BJS Statistician

2f: Specialist Treatment Centres: Durban/Pietermaritzburg (PMB)

Substance Abuse Overview 2014 Statewide

Evaluation of Substance Abuse Treatment Outcomes

Substance Abuse Treatment Needs, Capacity and Costs

New Jersey Drug and Alcohol Abuse Treatment Substance Abuse Overview 2010 Passaic County

Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program

Annual Report on Substance Abuse Treatment Programs

Substance Abuse Treatment Statistics Barnstable County Residents Focus on 2007 to July 25, 2013

Annual Report on Substance Abuse Treatment Programs

alcohol and drug Treatment Services Report Hawai i,

An integrated approach to addressing opiate abuse in Maine. Debra L. Brucker, MPA, PhD State of Maine Office of Substance Abuse October 2009

NC ADATC Service. NC Coalition for MH/DD/SAS By Division of State Operated Healthcare Facilities February, 2015 DSOHF ADATC 2.

Kentucky Needs Assessment Project Brief Report. IV Drug Use among Kentucky Adults

Substance Abuse Overview 2014 Morris County

Substance Use, Treatment Need and Receipt of Treatment in Minnesota:

PRISM SECTION 1 OVERVIEW. Number of times divorced. Number of times widowed

Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment Centers

Substance Abuse Overview 2014 Hunterdon County

Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions Involving Abuse of Pain Relievers: 1998 and 2008

New Jersey Substance Abuse Monitoring System (NJ-SAMS) Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions 1/1/ /31/2013 Resident of Camden County

SASKATCHEWAN NNADAP TREATMENT SERVICES APPLICATION FORM Revised June, 2009 VAN LOONVCONSULTING

Substance Abuse Overview 2012 Middlesex County

Revised April 1, 2015 Page 1 of 5

Special Report Substance Abuse and Treatment, State and Federal Prisoners, 1997

Demographic Profile of Wichita Unemployment Insurance Beneficiaries Q3 2015

a lc ohol a n d dru g Treatment Services Hawai i, 5-Year Trends ( )

CHAPTER 6: Substance Abuse and Mental Health A Comparison of Appalachian Coal Mining Areas to Other Areas within the Appalachian Region

ALAMEDA COUNTY SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER (SUD) SERVICES

Survey of Structure and Operations (TCU SSO)

CASE MANAGEMENT INVENTORY OF SUPPORT SERVICES For Adults

ACCOUNTABILITY COURT DATA. Ren Yang Hafner, Operations Analyst Statistical Analysis Center Criminal Justice Coordinating Council

Patient Satisfaction Survey Results

Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS) National Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment Services

Evaluation of the Colorado Short Term Intensive Residential Remediation Treatment (STIRRT) Programs

UTAH DIVISION OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND MENTAL HEALTH SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER SERVICES MONITORING CHECKLIST (FY 2014) GENERAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

Drug Abuse Trends Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota

Idaho Peer Support Specialist Training Application

Selected Socio-Economic Data. Baker County, Florida

Dodge-Fillmore- Olmsted Methamphetamine Treatment Project. July 2006-December 2007 evaluation report

Residential SOAP and Inpatient Dual Diagnosis Comparisons Consumer Satisfaction Report, Addendum to Inpatient Aggregate Report

Please answer all questions which apply to you and mark those that do not apply with N/A. LAST NAME FIRST NAME MIDDLE NAME

Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) DWI Addiction Treatment Programs (ATP) Outcome Study for DWI Offenders

Presentation to the Boston HIV Planning Council. Lydie Ultimo, MSW Director Bureau of Substance Abuse Services

March Senior Executive Service Report

o Please include me on the ACCBO List

Demographic Profile of Wichita Unemployment Insurance Beneficiaries Q2 2014

How To Identify A Substance Abuse/Addiction Counselor

Division of Behavioral Health Services

WITS (Web Infrastructure for Treatment Services).

Application for Health Coverage & Help Paying Costs

STUDENT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT

FY 2012 Block Grant Reporting Section

Special Report. Parents in Prison and Their Minor Children. Bureau of Justice Statistics

California Northstate University College of Pharmacy Transfer Student Application

There are 5 demographic data elements that include gender, date of birth, race, ethnicity status,

Santa Fe Recovery Center Follow Up Survey Form

Evaluation at the Recovery Centers Last Updated July 10, 2013

Child & Adolescent Quality Access and Policy Committee Residential Treatment Centers Friday June 20, 2014

APPLICATION FOR Page 1/7 RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT

Quarterly Form (SAP Online), Page 1

Cowlitz County Drug Court Evaluation

TEEN CHALLENGE CENTER--PENSACOLA, FLORIDA STUDENT APPLICATION FOR PROGRAM ENTRY. Personal Data and Information. In Case of Emergency Please Contact

Summary of 2011 AARP Survey of Virginians 18+: State Health Insurance Exchange Prepared by Jennifer H. Sauer State Research, AARP.

Transcription:

Provider Name (#): Jefferson County Comprehensive Services (0225) Date of Report: 09/30/2014 Engagement, Retention and Continuity of Care Measure Status by Level of Care and SFY 2014 Quarter* Detoxification - Engagement % (#) of Detox Clients/Length of Stay At Least Two Days % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 91.0% 10,238 80.9% 2,500 78.0% 2,206 81.5% 2,353 82.3% 2,385 80.7% 9,444 Region V 94.0% 687 78.6% 180 78.3% 198 81.7% 196 82.0% 191 80.1% 765 Provider 93.9% 519 93.3% 112 91.0% 121 93.9% 107 93.9% 107 92.9% 447 Detoxification - Retention % of Discharged Detox Clients/Completed Services % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 76.2% 8,460 65.9% 1,882 68.0% 1,735 65.9% 1,786 63.4% 1,682 65.8% 7,085 Region V 59.5% 433 58.1% 133 58.2% 146 60.7% 142 58.5% 131 58.8% 552 Provider 52.1% 287 47.5% 57 48.9% 64 55.9% 62 47.3% 53 49.8% 236 Detoxification - Continuity of Care % of Detox Clients/Linked to Treatment % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 52.0% 4,551 55.0% 1,374 54.5% 1,096 49.5% 952 42.7% 807 50.8% 4,229 Region V 56.1% 340 63.6% 112 64.0% 112 53.5% 85 56.3% 90 59.6% 399 Provider 44.9% 201 47.1% 49 50.5% 54 31.8% 27 34.1% 31 41.6% 161 Page 1

Provider Name (#): Jefferson County Comprehensive Services (0225) Date of Report: 09/30/2014 Engagement, Retention and Continuity of Care Measure Status by Level of Care and SFY 2014 Quarter* Level I - Engagement % Admitted Level I Clients/At Least 4 Sessions/First 30 Days % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 47.8% 15,004 46.9% 3,618 42.4% 3,072 48.2% 3,773 45.7% 3,400 45.9% 13,863 Region V 38.3% 1,472 40.5% 538 33.8% 395 42.6% 558 36.9% 456 38.6% 1,947 Provider 40.3% 96 60.9% 39 42.9% 39 58.1% 36 37.7% 20 49.6% 134 Level I - Retention % of Discharged Level I Clients/Completed Treatment (A) % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 51.9% 12,328 52.3% 3,381 51.4% 2,998 50.7% 2,938 49.9% 2,211 51.2% 11,528 Region V 39.5% 938 49.7% 551 50.2% 475 49.4% 463 50.1% 344 49.8% 1,833 Provider 37.9% 85 41.3% 26 43.8% 39 33.3% 20 21.6% 8 37.3% 93 Level I - Retention % of Clients/At Least 10 Sessions After First 30 Days (B) % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 25.2% 7,904 27.1% 2,089 27.2% 1,971 24.0% 1,876 17.3% 1,284 23.9% 7,220 Region V 28.1% 1,080 27.0% 358 26.5% 309 25.6% 336 16.2% 200 23.9% 1,203 Provider 16.8% 40 20.3% 13 19.8% 18 22.6% 14 15.1% 8 19.6% 53 Level I - Retention % of Admitted Level I Clients/A and/or B % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 52.7% 16,560 56.3% 4,343 53.9% 3,902 51.4% 4,022 42.2% 3,142 51.0% 15,409 Region V 42.3% 1,628 55.9% 742 53.8% 628 51.4% 674 40.5% 501 50.5% 2,545 Provider 40.8% 97 40.6% 26 45.1% 41 37.1% 23 24.5% 13 38.1% 103 Page 2

Provider Name (#): Jefferson County Comprehensive Services (0225) Date of Report: 09/30/2014 Engagement, Retention and Continuity of Care Measure Status by Level of Care and SFY 2014 Quarter* Level I - Continuity of Care % of Discharged Clients/12-Step Group Participation (A) % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 37.1% 8,437 38.3% 2,392 36.1% 1,999 36.6% 1,966 38.3% 1,597 37.3% 7,954 Region V 23.2% 492 30.6% 305 28.8% 236 29.0% 224 29.9% 173 29.4% 938 Provider 77.7% 129 83.0% 39 79.3% 42 85.7% 24 82.6% 19 82.1% 124 Level I - Continuity of Care % of Discharged Clients/Supportive Interaction (B) % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 74.9% 16,987 75.8% 4,741 76.3% 4,242 75.7% 4,129 77.3% 3,237 76.2% 16,349 Region V 68.2% 1,436 72.9% 728 73.0% 599 70.9% 551 70.1% 398 72.0% 2,276 Provider 78.7% 133 93.6% 44 90.7% 49 100.0% 31 82.6% 19 92.3% 143 Level I - Continuity of Care % of Discharged Clients/A and/or B % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 77.7% 17,676 78.5% 4,930 78.4% 4,381 77.9% 4,252 79.8% 3,355 78.6% 16,918 Region V 71.4% 1,496 76.2% 751 76.3% 625 73.2% 569 72.8% 413 74.9% 2,358 Provider 86.5% 148 93.8% 45 92.9% 52 100.0% 31 82.6% 19 93.0% 147 Page 3

Provider Name (#): Jefferson County Comprehensive Services (0225) Date of Report: 09/30/2014 Engagement, Retention and Continuity of Care Measure Status by Level of Care and SFY 2014 Quarter* Level III.5 - Engagement % of Level III.5 Clients/Length of Stay of At Least 7 Days % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 86.4% 10,624 88.3% 2,901 88.6% 2,787 87.0% 2,736 86.8% 2,753 87.7% 11,177 Region V 84.7% 692 89.4% 353 91.9% 374 90.4% 350 87.9% 372 89.9% 1,449 Provider 86.9% 106 93.5% 29 96.3% 26 87.8% 36 91.2% 31 91.7% 122 Level III.5 - Retention % of Level III.5 Clients/Length of Stay of At Least 14 Days % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 75.3% 9,252 75.9% 2,495 76.8% 2,415 74.2% 2,334 74.8% 2,374 75.4% 9,618 Region V 73.7% 602 80.5% 318 78.9% 321 80.6% 312 76.6% 324 79.1% 1,275 Provider 78.7% 96 90.3% 28 92.6% 25 85.4% 35 82.4% 28 87.2% 116 Level III.5 - Continuity of Care % of Clients/Linked to Lower Level of Care % N % n % n % n % n % N Statewide 36.0% 4,109 47.5% 1,600 46.1% 1,340 41.4% 1,141 23.0% 618 40.1% 4,699 Region V 52.1% 416 63.0% 254 58.2% 212 57.4% 189 29.5% 100 52.6% 755 Provider 41.9% 52 64.5% 20 26.1% 18 44.4% 16 25.9% 7 48.7% 58 *Performance measure levels for a particular quarter are based on service billings accepted in DARTS as of the date of the report for clients opened during that quarter. Page 4

Employment Status - Clients Employed (Full-time or Part-time) at Provider Region V Statewide Admission vs. Discharge. (Excludes Clients not in Labor Force) Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Level I Client Outcome Measures - Employment Status** # of Clients Employed Full-time or Part-time (Numerator) 38 68 949 1,217 5,454 6,563 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 191 191 2,700 2,700 14,495 14,495 % of Clients Employed Full-time or Part-time. 19.9% 35.6% 35.1% 45.1% 37.6% 45.3% Level III.5 Client Outcome Measures - Employment Status** # of Clients Employed Full-time or Part-time (Numerator) 6 11 134 110 726 622 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 86 86 700 700 5,072 5,072 % of Clients Employed Full-time or Part-time. 7.0% 12.8% 19.1% 15.7% 14.3% 12.3% **Comparisons based on clients opened during State Fiscal Year 2014 who were discharged as of 09/30/2014. Clients with missing values for employment status or who are reported to not be in the labor force at either admission or discharge are excluded. Clients who are deceased or incarcerated at time of discharge are also excluded. Page 5

Housing Status - Clients with Stable Housing (Independent Provider Region V Statewide Living) at Admission vs. Discharge. Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Level I Client Outcome Measures - Housing Status** # of Clients with Stable Housing (Numerator) 70 84 1,428 1,544 8,466 8,727 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 238 238 3,563 3,563 21,679 21,679 % of Clients with Stable Housing. 29.4% 35.3% 40.1% 43.3% 39.1% 40.3% Level III.5 Client Outcome Measures - Housing Status** # of Clients with Stable Housing (Numerator) 34 36 448 435 2,844 2,630 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 132 132 1,624 1,624 12,305 12,305 % of Clients with Stable Housing. 25.8% 27.3% 27.6% 26.8% 23.1% 21.4% **Comparisons based on clients opened during State Fiscal Year 2014 who were discharged as of 09/30/2014. Clients with missing values for housing status at either admission or discharge are excluded. Clients who are deceased or incarcerated at time of discharge are also excluded. Page 6

Criminal Justice Status - Clients with No Arrests during Provider Region V Statewide the Prior 30 Days at Admission vs. Discharge. Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Level I Client Outcome Measures - Criminal Justice Status** # of Clients with No Arrests/Prior 30 Days (Numerator) 244 227 3,322 3,490 20,977 21,228 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 249 249 3,679 3,679 22,266 22,266 % of Clients with No Arrests/Prior 30 Days. 98.0% 91.2% 90.3% 94.9% 94.2% 95.3% Level III.5 Client Outcome Measures - Criminal Justice Status** # of Clients with No Arrests/Prior 30 Days (Numerator) 119 131 1,444 1,609 11,084 12,211 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 133 133 1,640 1,640 12,412 12,412 % of Clients with No Arrests/Prior 30 Days. 89.5% 98.5% 88.0% 98.1% 89.3% 98.4% **Comparisons based on clients opened during State Fiscal Year 2014 who were discharged as of 09/30/2014. Clients with missing values for number of arrests in the prior 30 days at either admission or discharge are excluded. Clients who are deceased at time of discharge are also excluded. Page 7

Alcohol Abstinence - Clients with No Alcohol Use at Provider Region V Statewide Admission vs. Discharge. Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Level I Client Outcome Measures - Alcohol Abstinence** # of Clients Abstinent from Alcohol Use (Numerator) 38 50 796 919 4,618 5,786 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 60 60 1,402 1,402 8,042 8,042 % of Clients Abstinent from Alcohol Use. 63.3% 83.3% 56.8% 65.5% 57.4% 71.9% Level III.5 Client Outcome Measures - Alcohol Abstinence** # of Clients Abstinent from Alcohol Use (Numerator) 3 35 88 285 442 2,223 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 42 42 436 436 3,302 3,302 % of Clients Abstinent from Alcohol Use. 7.1% 83.3% 20.2% 65.4% 13.4% 67.3% **Comparisons based on clients opened during State Fiscal Year 2014 who were discharged as of 09/30/2014. Clients with missing values for both primary and secondary substance type and/or frequency at admission or discharge are excluded. Clients who are deceased or incarcerated at time of discharge are also excluded. Page 8

Other Drug Abstinence - Clients with No Use of Drugs Other Provider Region V Statewide than Alcohol at Admission vs. Discharge. Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Level I Client Outcome Measures - Other Drug Abstinence** # of Clients Abstinent from Other Drug Use (Numerator) 139 140 1,281 1,391 6,809 8,208 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 177 177 2,148 2,148 13,195 13,195 % of Clients Abstinent from Other Drug Use. 78.5% 79.1% 59.6% 64.8% 51.6% 62.2% Level III.5 Client Outcome Measures - Other Drug Abstinence** # of Clients Abstinent from Other Drug Use (Numerator) 28 75 247 777 1,344 5,751 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 88 88 1,161 1,161 8,560 8,560 % of Clients Abstinent from Other Drug Use. 31.8% 85.2% 21.3% 66.9% 15.7% 67.2% **Comparisons based on clients opened during State Fiscal Year 2014 who were discharged as of 09/30/2014. Clients with missing values for both primary and secondary substance type and/or frequency at admission or discharge are excluded. Clients who are deceased or incarcerated at time of discharge are also excluded. Page 9

Social Connectedness/Self-Help Group Involvement - Clients with Self-Help Group Involvement/Prior 30 Days at Provider Region V Statewide Admission vs. Discharge. Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Level I Client Outcome Measures - Social Connectedness/Self-Help Group Involvement** # of Clients with Self-Help Group Involvement (Numerator) 91 119 667 821 4,776 6,991 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 142 142 2,706 2,706 18,446 18,446 % of Clients with Self-Help Group Involvement. 64.1% 83.8% 24.6% 30.3% 25.9% 37.9% Level III.5 Client Outcome Measures - Social Connectedness/Self-Help Group Involvement** # of Clients with Self-Help Group Involvement (Numerator) 98 125 487 1,265 3,516 9,202 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 128 128 1,521 1,521 11,915 11,915 % of Clients with Self-Help Group Involvement. 76.6% 97.7% 32.0% 83.2% 29.5% 77.2% **Comparisons based on clients opened during State Fiscal Year 2014 who were discharged as of 09/30/2014. Clients with missing values for self-help group involvement at admission or discharge are excluded. Clients who are deceased or incarcerated at time of discharge are also excluded. Page 10

Social Connectedness/Supportive Social Interaction - Clients with Supportive Interaction with Family and/or Friends/Prior Provider Region V Statewide 30 Days at Admission vs. Discharge. Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Level I Client Outcome Measures - Social Connectedness/Supportive Interaction** # of Clients with Supportive Social Interaction (Numerator) 100 128 1,791 1,951 13,717 14,306 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 137 137 2,674 2,674 18,532 18,532 % of Clients with Supportive Social Interaction. 73.0% 93.4% 67.0% 73.0% 74.0% 77.2% Level III.5 Client Outcome Measures - Social Connectedness/Supportive Interaction** # of Clients with Supportive Social Interaction (Numerator) 87 101 1,243 1,382 8,434 9,609 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 110 110 1,476 1,476 11,481 11,481 % of Clients with Supportive Social Interaction. 79.1% 91.8% 84.2% 93.6% 73.5% 83.7% **Comparisons based on clients opened during State Fiscal Year 2014 who were discharged as of 09/30/2014. Clients with missing values for supportive interaction at admission or discharge are excluded. Clients who are deceased or incarcerated at time of discharge are also excluded. Page 11

Provider Performance and Outcomes Reports - SFY 2014 Admitted Patient/Client Demographics Provider Organization (Provider #) Jefferson County Comprehensive Services (0225) Total # of Admissions 882 Avg. Age at Opening 33.4 Gender % N Living Arrangements % N Unduplicated 68.8% 607 % < 18 Years of Age 1.5% 13 Male 61.7% 544 Shelter/TLC/Safe Haven 6.6% 58 Prior SUD Serv. Episodes 66.9% 590 Patient/Client Race % N Female 38.3% 338 Hosp./Jail/Prison/Other Inst. 1.8% 16 Adms. by Level of Care % N American Indian 0.7% 6 Hispanic Ethnicity % N Own Home/Apartment 31.5% 278 Detoxification 54.2% 478 Alaska Native 0.1% 1 Puerto Rican 0.1% 1 Someone Else's Home/Apt. 59.2% 522 Level I 30.3% 267 Asian 0.0% 0 Mexican 0.1% 1 Res.Tx/Hwy.Hse/Rec.Home 0.3% 3 Level I - OMT 0.0% 0 Nat. Hawaiian/Pac. Isl. 0.0% 0 Cuban 0.0% 0 Health Insurance - None 50.1% 442 Level II 0.0% 0 Black/African Amer. 11.3% 100 Other Hispanic/Latino 0.2% 2 Employment Status % N Level III.5 15.5% 137 White 87.2% 769 Not Hispanic/Latino 98.9% 872 Full-Time 7.8% 69 Level III.1 0.0% 0 Other Single Race 0.7% 6 Hisp./Not Spec. 0.7% 6 Part-Time 6.0% 53 Recovery Home 0.0% 0 Marital Status % N % N Unemployed 56.8% 501 Children/Dependents % N Never Married 54.2% 478 Pregnant at Opening 1.7% 15 Not in Labor Force 29.4% 259 Children/25 and Younger 43.4% 383 Married 12.5% 110 DCFS Involved 15.5% 137 Problem Area % N Avg. # of Children/25 and Younger 0.9 Widowed 3.6% 32 Patient/English Prof. 100.0% 882 Alcohol 15.5% 137 Children/Elsewhere/Courts 6.6% 58 Divorced 22.3% 197 MISA Patient/Client 0.3% 3 Other Drugs 48.4% 427 # of Children/Elsewhere/Court Ord. 160 Separated 7.4% 65 Crim. Just. Referral 33.4% 295 Alcohol & Other Drugs 36.1% 318 Childrn./Lost Parental Rights 4.9% 43 Avg. Grade Completed 12.0 Arrested/Past 30 Days 7.5% 66 Alcohol/Drugs/Gambling 0.0% 0 # of Children/Lost Parental Rights 140 Less than H.S. Educ. 29.6% 261 Veteran Status - Yes 2.4% 21 Gambling Only 0.0% 0 Primary Substance Secondary Substance Alcohol: 31.7% (280); Cocaine/Crack: 7.4% (65); Marijuana: 18.5% (163) Alcohol: 14.5% (128); Cocaine/Crack: 5.9% (52); Marijuana: 21.0% (185) Heroin: 10.8% (95); Other Opiates: 11.8% (104); Methamphetamine: 12.5% (110) Heroin: 0.7% (6); Other Opiates: 7.3% (64); Methamphetamine: 5.7% (50) Benzodiazepines: 2.4% (21); Other Hallucinogens: 2.7% (24); None: 0.5% (4) Benzodiazepines: 2.5% (22); PCP/Other Hallucinogens: 0.9% (8); None: 39.9% (352) Used Primary Substance/30 Days Prior to Opening: 72.8% (642) Used Secondary Substance/30 Days Prior to Opening: 36.8% (325) Organization-wide Patient/Client Access and Discharge Indicators Provider - SFY 2014 Statewide - SFY 2014 Average Duration from Initial Contact to Opening Date 11.0 Days 8.2 Days Median Duration from Initial Contact to Opening Date 0.0 Days 0.0 Days % (#) of Admissions - No Reported Wait for Assessment 58.2% (513) 51.6% (38,213) % (#) of Discharged Patients/Clients - Completion of Services 47.6% (408) 51.9% (31,993) % (#) of Discharged Patients/Clients - DASA Administrative Discharges 0.8% (7) 4.2% (3,141) % (#) of Patients/Clients - Remain Opened/90 Days After Close of SFY 2.9% (26) 16.8% (12,454) Page 12