Online Course Design Evaluation



Similar documents
Effective Practices for Fully Online and Blended Courses

Online Course Checklist for Instructional Designers and Faculty Developers

12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 2

12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 1

MJC Online Course Review Process DRAFT

THE CHECK. academic. A Guide to Online Course Design. What aspects of course design does The Check address? How can The Check be used?

SVCC Exemplary Online Course Checklist

The Check: A Guide to Online Course Design

Checklist of Competencies for Effective Online Teaching

RUBRIC for Evaluating Online Courses

Online Course Development Guide and Review Rubric

Categories Criteria Instructional and Audience Analysis. Prerequisites are clearly listed within the syllabus.

Online Course Development Guide

Psychology 41 Life-Span Psychology from infancy to old age - Development Emily Bill for Winter 2016 Reviewed and

Community College System of New Hampshire

Sample Online Course Evaluation

VALIDATION OF PREPAREDNESS TO TEACH ONLINE

Distance Education Learning Resources Unit Document Title: Online Course Review Checklist Last Updated: July 17, 2013 by the DE Office Draft Final

University of West Georgia 5-Star Online Course Review

Assuring that the Online Course is Ready for Prime Time

Blackboard Exemplary Course Program Rubric

Best Practices in Online Course Design and Delivery

Welcome to the Quality Matters: Evolving Standards for Online Courses fully-online workshop.

General Procedures for Developing an Online Course

COURSE ADMINISTRATION

Del Mar College, Corpus Christi, TX Department of Mathematics. Course: ID: Instructor:

Quality Guidelines for Online Courses

STEP ONE Work with instructor to develop/redesign course and fill out sections I VII. COURSE DEVELOPMENT or REVISION Course Information

Northern Virginia Community College: Hybrid Course Template

Course Evaluation: A Tool for Faculty

Online Learning at Duke: A Planning Guide

1. Instructional Design Elements a. Support & Resources Essential Criteria: 1. Students are provided information as to where to get technical help.

Blended Course Evaluation Standards

Cowboy Quality Online Course Evaluation (Title III) Version 3.0 Course Title Goes Here Total Score=0%

Measuring Online Course Design: A Comparative Analysis

Blackboard Development Checklist for Online Courses

Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary TRAINING SERIES. This manual will help you get started with the new Blackboard apps for the ipad and iphone

Guide to Best Practices in Online Teaching. Online Teaching and Learning Committee Cuyamaca College. Revised November 2012

Quality Matters Online Course Development and Guidelines

Course Development Resource Guide. Professional Development & Community Engagement Educational Technology Support

Features of the Online Course. Table of Contents. Course Interface: Overview Syllabus Navigating through the Course Content...

HCC ONLINE COURSE REVIEW RUBRIC

Comparing Canvas and Blackboard

Virtual Coastal Bend College (vcbc) Course Approval Form

Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana

A tool to assist in the design, redesign, and/or evaluation of online courses.

Instructor Review: Delgado Community College Standards for Online Courses. The points are to help you understand how your course will be evaluated.

Before you begin to adapt your course for online learning, consider the following questions:

Usability Test Script

Online Course Proposal Form Form 1

UW-La Crosse Online Course Evaluation Guidelines

Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana

Getting Started Guide For Students

MOE Online Class Quality Guidelines

Online Course Standards Rubric

HOSTOS ONLINE COURSE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES

How To Write A Rubric For Online Instruction

Instructional Design Tips

Gonzaga University Virtual Campus Ignatian Pedagogical Approach Design Portfolio (IPA) Updated: October 15, 2014

Online Course Development Guidelines and Rubric

Distance Education. learn.cbshouston.edu. Spring 2014 Student Guide. Removing the Barriers of Location and Time

This manual will help you get started with the new Blackboard apps for the ipad and iphone

GUIDE TO ONLINE COURSE DESIGN AND QUALITY STANDARDS

Online Instruction - Requirements and Reviewing Recommendations

Instructional Computing in Secondary Schools

Blackboard Learning System: Student Instructional Guide

93% of staff (274) who completed the on-line training provided feedback. This indicated that staff felt that:

As a self-evaluation tool, simply apply the quality standards in the rubric to your own course.

AUGUST Register for our workshops on Academica. Workshops. Consultation Services. otl.wayne.edu

INST 5500 Online Course Development. Course Syllabus. Fall 2015 (Aug 17 Dec 12) 3 GR Semester Hours

Guidelines Online Course Design Rubric Based on the Quality Matters 05/06 Rubric NMSU Teaching Academy

Publishing Scholarly Papers. NURS Fall, 2015

MOU for New Online Program Development: Master of Engineering in Industrial Engineering, Engineering Management Option

PSY 3329 Educational Psychology Online Course Spring Week Course

HIT Practice Workflow & Information Management Redesign Presented by Ivy Tech Corporate College

Course Syllabus. All Semester-based courses follow a 16 week calendar as detailed in the Course Schedule.

edtpa Video Requirements Task 3: Student Work Samples Student Work

Accounting : Accounting Information Systems and Controls. Fall 2015 COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND INNOVATION

Pedagogy of Effective Online Course Design and Delivery Schedule

Teaching Online at UD Best Practices Guide

Transcription:

Online Course Design Evaluation This evaluation tool focuses on the design of this online course, NOT the performance of your instructor. Please use the scale from 1 (To little or no extent) to 5 (To a very great extent) to make your evaluation. If an item is not applicable, leave the response blank. Your responses to this evaluation are anonymous; no identifying information will attach your answers. Course Introduction 1. The introductions of the course made clear how to get started and where to find course components. 2. The purpose and structure of the course were introduced to the students. Learning Objectives 1. The course objectives were clearly presented in the course syllabus and measurable (I know what I will be able to do upon completion of the course). 2. The learning objectives were clearly stated for each unit or module and consistent with the course level objectives. 3. All learning objectives are stated clearly and written from the students perspective. 4. The relationship between learning objectives and course activities is clearly stated.

5. The learning objectives are appropriate for the level of this course. Assessment and Measurement 1. The course quizzes/exams/assignments/projects were consistent with the course objectives. 2. The course grading policy (e.g. how the grades were computed) was clearly stated. 3. A description of criteria or rubric used to evaluate students work and participation in the course was clearly stated. Instructional Materials 1. The course materials were helpful for me to achieve the learning objectives. 2. The purpose of instructional materials and how the materials are to be used for learning are clearly explained.

Course Activities and Learner Interaction 1. The learning activities in the course were helpful for me to achieve the learning objectives. 2. The learning activities and course tools provided opportunities for interaction that support active learning. 3. The instructor s plan for online response time and feedback on assignments is clearly stated. Course Technology 1. The tools used in this course support the learning objectives. 2. The tools used in this course guide students to become an active learner. Learner Support 1. The course instruction articulated or linked to UT tech support/learner support.

2. The course instructions articulated or linked to accessibility policy and services. Accessibility and Usability 1. Navigation throughout the online components of the courses was easy to use and consistent. 2. Information on the accessibility of Blackboard Learn and other required technologies such as Pearson MyLab, Connect etc. is provided or linked. 3. The media and other components of the course are accessible (can be used by learners with diverse needs). For example, captions are available for videos, transcripts are available to audio clips, and PDF documents can be highlighted and selected. Overall Design 1. The course was well-organized. 2. I achieved the objectives stated on the course syllabus.

3. What parts of the course design (for example, course organization, discussion rubric, journal reflections, video clips etc.) were most useful to you? 4. What parts of the course design need improvement?