Treatment of dairy wastewater by natural coagulants



Similar documents
REMOVAL OF PHOSPHATE FROM WASTEWATER USING LOW-COST ADSORBENTS

Phosphate removal from phosphorus containing wastewater by coagulation/flocculation process using Gossypium spp. (GS) as coagulant

HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM REMOVAL FROM INDUSTRIAL WATSEWATER BY CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION METHOD

Brewery Wastewater: 2010 Water and Wastewater Conference Page 1

NAJAFGARH DRAIN-SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

WASTEWATER TREATMENT OBJECTIVES

Planning, Designing, Monitoring and Inspection of Wastewater Treatment Systems of Industries

Nutrient Removal at Wastewater Treatment Facilities. Nitrogen and Phosphorus. Gary M. Grey HydroQual, Inc X 7167

NUTRIENT REMOVAL FROM SECONDARY EFFLUENT BY ALUM FLOCCULATION AND LIME PRECIPITATION*

POINT SOURCES OF POLLUTION: LOCAL EFFECTS AND IT S CONTROL Vol. II - Technologies for Water Pollution Control - Wang Jianlong

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Phosphorus Removal. Wastewater Treatment

Module 16: The Activated Sludge Process - Part II Instructor Guide Answer Key

WISCONSIN WASTEWATER OPERATORS ASSOCIATION

MALAYSIA S REQUIREMENTS ON INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENT TREATMENT SYSTEMS -The WEPA Workshop and Annual Meeting February 2013 Siem Reap, Combodiaby

GUIDELINES FOR LEACHATE CONTROL


TREATMENT OF SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOW

Chemistry at Work. How Chemistry is used in the Water Service

ENE 806, Project Report 3 CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION: WATER SOFTENING. Grégoire Seyrig Wenqian Shan

Comparison of Efficiency of some Natural Coagulants- Bioremediation

CWD BALDWIN PLANT NEW RESIDUALS HANDLING SYSTEM

SOLAR WATER PURIFICATION WITH THE HELP OF CSP TECHNOLOGY

Application of Moringa Oleifera Seed Extract for Activated Sludge Thickening

Development of Advanced Wastewater Treatment and Reclamation System

Water and Wastewater. Sample Collection and Analysis

Phosphorus removal in low alkalinity secondary effluent using alum

Laboratory analysis for wastewater treatment, industrial monitoring, and environmental protection

DAIRY WASTEWATER-A CASE STUDY

POINT SOURCES OF POLLUTION: LOCAL EFFECTS AND IT S CONTROL Vol. I - Industrial Wastewater-Types, Amounts and Effects - Hanchang SHI

Sewerage Management System for Reduction of River Pollution

TERRA TEK LIMITED GUIDE TO SAMPLE HANDLING. Version 1.06

Appendix D lists the Field Services Standard Operating Procedures. Appendix E lists the Biological Monitoring Standard Operating Procedures.

NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering. CV2701: Laboratory 2A. Laboratory Manual. For

SYNERGISTIC APPLICATION OF ADVANCED PRIMARY AND SECONDARY WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS

DRINKING WATER - LAB EXPERIMENTS. Coagulation and flocculation LAB EXPERIMENTS. Jartest

CHAPTER 8 UPGRADING EXISTING TREATMENT FACILITIES

EXTRACTION OF OIL FROM ALGAE BY SOLVENT EXTRACTION AND OIL EXPELLER METHOD

In-Situ Remediation of Estero de Paco by the Application of Local Organo Minerals

PROPAK AquaBio Complete Water Restoration Systems

Physico-chemical Characterization of Distillery Effluent and its Dilution Effect at Different Levels

Glossary of Wastewater Terms

Removal of Turbidity, Organic Matter, Coliform and Heterotrophic Bacteria by Coagulants Poly Aluminium Chloride from Karoon River Water in Iran

Wastewater characteristics

Phosphorus, Reactive (Orthophosphate)

Experts Review of Aerobic Treatment Unit Operation and Maintenance. Bruce Lesikar Texas AgriLife Extension Service

Dairy Processing Methods to Reduce Water Use and Liquid Waste Load. Kent D. Rausch Extension Specialist, Food Engineering

Presented by Paul Krauth Utah DEQ. Salt Lake Countywide Watershed Symposium October 28-29, 2008

Table 1.1: Typical Characteristics of Anaerobically Digested Wastewater

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES

1.85 WATER AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT ENGINEERING FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 20, 2005

OPTIMIZING BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL FROM AN SBR SYSTEM MIDDLEBURY, VT. Paul Klebs, Senior Applications Engineer Aqua-Aerobic Systems, Inc.

THE NEW NSF 350 AND 350-1

1 Environmental Leverage Inc Dogwood Dr. Suite A, North Aurora, IL EnvironmentalLeverage.com

The Empirical Formula of a Compound

Requirements for the ongoing assessment of treatment system performance

Best Practice Guide NO. BPGCS002. Wastewater Treatment Activated Sludge Process

Overview of Best Available Technologies for Onsite Septic Systems and Management Considerations Presentation to NAHB

Provided below is a description of the processes generating wastewater in a poultry plant and a typical pretreatment and full treatment system.

Case Study of an Advanced On-Site Wastewater Treatment System Connected to a Single-Family Residence

Ground Water Contamination by Leachate

Depletion Respiration

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGMENT OF PHARMACEUTICAL WASTES: EXPERIENCE FROM EGYPT

Bioremediation- Natural Way for Water Treatment

Biological Wastewater Treatment

RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT SYSTEMS

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES IN THE RENDERING INDUSTRY. Gregory L. Sindt, P.E. Environmental Engineer Bolton and Menk, Inc.

Removing Heavy Metals from Wastewater

Engineers Edge, LLC PDH & Professional Training

Floating Treatment Wetland Technology: Nutrient Removal from Wastewater

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS part 1

A NOVEL ION-EXCHANGE/ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY FOR THE TREATMENT OF AMMONIA IN WASTEWATER

ASSESSMENT OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND WATER REUSE PRACTICES IN THE GULF COUNTRIES

Unit 1. Physical, chemical and biological Characteristics of Wastewater

Phosphate Recovery from Municipal Wastewater through Crystallization of Calcium Phosphate

Natural and Advanced Treatment Systems for Wastewater Management at Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Site in Developing Countries

The Use of Magnesium Hydroxide Slurry as a Safe and Cost Effective Solution for H 2

POTW PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL PROCESSES

City of Lakeland s Wetlands Treatment System An Overview

A COMPUTER CONTROLLED SYSTEM FOR WATER QUALITY MONITORING

1.3 Wastewater and Ambient Water Quality

Oasis Clearwater ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS WASTEWATER TREATMENT ENGINEERS

TABLE OF CONTENTS 2. PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN IN WASTEWATER 3. PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN REMOVAL MECHANISM 4. PROCESS REQUIREMENT AND CONTROL FACTOR

Facility Classification Standards

Environmental Technology March/April 1998

Adjusting Chemical Levels in a Swimming Pool

Active Treatment Systems

MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY TREATING OILY WASTEWATER FOR REUSE

Choosing an Effluent Treatment Plant

Cadmium Reduction Method Method to 30.0 mg/l NO 3 N (HR) Powder Pillows or AccuVac Ampuls

To meet our acceptance criteria, we may require you to partially treat your wastewater before it discharges to sewer.

Studies on colour removal efficiency of textile dyeing waste water using Moringo Olifera

Lesson Plan: How Do We Know What is Healthy Water?

Membrane Filtration Technology: Meeting Today s Water Treatment Challenges

Transcription:

Treatment of dairy wastewater by natural coagulants Prof. Chidanand Patil 1, Ms. Manika Hugar 2 1 Assistant professor, Environmental Engineering, KLEMSSCET Belgaum, Karnataka, India 2PG Scholar, Environmental Engineering, KLEMSSCET Belgaum, Karnataka, India ---------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract - The dairy industry is generally considered to be largest source of food processing. These industries wastewater is characterized by high COD, BOD, nutrients etc. Such wastewater is to be treated natural coagulants and then tests are to be carried to check the water characteristics like BOD, COD, ph and turbidity, etc. The initial ph, Turbidity, COD are 7.41. 289.5 NTU, 10000 mg/l respectively. Natural coagulants to be used are Moringa Oleifera seeds, Trigonella foenum-graecum, Dolichos lablab and Cicer arietinum. The efficiency of reduction of turbidity by M.oleifera, Dolichos lablab, T.foenum-graecum and Cicer arietinum are 61.60%, 71.74%, 58.20% and 78.33% respectively. The efficiency of reduction of COD from M.oleifera, Dolichos lablab, T.foenum-graecum and Cicer arietinum are 65.0%, 75%, 62.5% and 83% respectively. For variation of doses of these natural coagulants the reduction of solids takes place. There is not much change in ph and conductivity due to natural coagulants. The efficiency of Cicer arietinum is more compared to other three; this depends on the protein content which is present Table-1: Characteristics of dairy wastewater in the natural coagulant. The increase of dosage causes the Parameter Units Value increase of turbidity. Key Words: natural coagulant, Solids, turbidity, COD, water treatment, M.oleifera, C.arietinum, D.lablab, T.foenumgraecum 1. Introduction The dairy industry is generally considered to be the largest source of food processing wastewater in many countries. With increase in demand for milk and milk products, many dairies of different sizes have come up in different places. These dairies collect the milk from the produces, and then either simply bottle it for marketing, or produce different milk foods according to their capacities. Large quantity of wastewater originates due to their different operations. The organic substances in the wastes comes either in the form in which they were present in milk, or in a degraded form due to their processing. As such, the dairy wastes, through biodegradable, are very strong in nature. [1] In dairy, wastewater is often discharged intermittently. The nature and composition of wastes depends on type of products produced and processing capacity of the plants. Dairy cleaning waters may also contain a variety of sterilizing agents and various acid and alkaline detergents. Thus, the ph of the wastewaters can vary significantly depending on the cleaning strategy employed. Dairy wastewaters are characterized by high biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentrations. Chemical oxygen demand (COD), which is normally about 1.5 times the BOD level, It also contains total solids, total dissolved solids, nitrogen and phosphorous. Important indicators for the quantification of organic load of dairy plant effluents are biological oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), the ratio of COD to BOD indicates the biodegradability of organic materials under aerobic or anaerobic condition. [2] (untreated ) ph - 7.41 Color Hazen White BOD mg/l 2250 COD mg/l 10000 Total solids mg/l 2033 Total Dissolved solids mg/l 1200 Total suspended solids mg/l 833 Oil and grease mg/l 1425 chloride mg/l 417 1.1. Characteristics of wastewater 2015, IRJET.NET- All Rights Reserved Page 1120

1.2. Material and Methodology The coagulants which are used in this study are Moringa oleifera, Trigonella foenum-graecum, Dolicus lablab and Cicer arietinum for treatment of dairy wastewater. The natural coagulants are collected from the local market of belagavi, Karnataka, India. Fig-1: M.oleifera Fig-3: D.lablab Fig-2: C.arietinum Fig-4: T.foenum-graecum Chart -1: Optimum Dosage of natural coagulants The optimum dosage of T.foenum-graecum, M.oleifera, C.arietinum and D.lablab are 0.05gm, 0.1gm, 0.1gm and 0.05gm respectively. 2.2 Optimum ph Optimum ph is ph at which the maximum reduction of turbidity takes place. Optimum ph can be determined by varying the ph value as 6, 7.41, 8, 9, 10, 11.The below chat-2 shows optimum ph. [5] 1.3. Preparation of natural coagulants The seed pods of Cicer arietinum, Dolichos lablab, Moringa oleifera and T.foenum-graecum are collected, and dried naturally by sunlight. And remove the seeds from the pod manually. The dried seeds were ground to fine powder by domestic blender. This powder was sieved through 600µm sieve. [4, 3, 6] 1.4. Coagulation study For the study of coagulation jar apparatus has been used. The doses considered for the natural coagulants are 0.025gm, 0.05gm, 0.1gm, 0.2gm, 0.3gm, 0.4gm, 0.5gm. The jar apparatus has the six beakers and six steel paddles which helps in the agitation process. The initial speed of agitation is 100rpm for 2 min, followed by 40rpm for 30min. The settling time applied for this coagulation process is 60 min. 2. Results and discussion 2.1. Optimum dosage The optimum dosage of coagulants are determined by varying the dosage of coagulants are 0.025gm, 0.05gm,0.1gm,0.2gm,0.3gm,0.4gm,0.5gm/500ml at original ph of dairy wastewater (ph =7.41). Chart-2: optimum ph of natural coagulants The optimum ph for the T.foenum-graecum, M.oleifera, C.arietinum and D.lablab are 8, 9, 10 and 7.41 respectively. 2.3. Efficiency of natural coagulants The performance evaluation can be determined by varying the COD value by dilution method and note down the initial value of Turbidity. Efficiency can be determined by maximum reduction of turbidity and COD after treatment of Dairy wastewater by natural coagulants with optimum dosage at optimum ph. 2015, IRJET.NET- All Rights Reserved Page 1121

Chart-4: Effect of Trigonella foenum-graecum on reduction of COD Table -2: Loading rate of COD SL NO COD mg/l 1 2000 2 4000 3 6000 4 8000 5 10000 2.3.1. Efficiency of T. foenum-graecum For each loading rate of COD, note down the initial turbidity. Then treat the dairy wastewater by T. foenumgraecum coagulant with optimum dosage (0.05/500ml) at optimum ph (8) of wastewater and determined the reduction of turbidity as shown in chart 3. The maximum reduction of COD by Trigonella foenumgraecum with optimum dosage (0.05gm/500ml) at optimum ph (8) is 62.5%. Hence the efficiency of Trigonella foenum-graecum is 62.5% in reduction of COD. 2.3.2. Efficiency of Moringa oleifera The COD varies as shown in the table 2. By the effect of Moringa Oleifera coagulant the reduction of turbidity is 61.60 %. The earlier study of Parmar Gaurang and Parikh Punita recommended the reduction of turbidity was takes place due to active component of M.oleifera seeds, which was found to be soluble cationic proteins having molecular weight of 13 kda. This will binds with solid particles. Hence the reduction of turbidity and COD takes place. [8] Chart-5: Effect of Moringa Oleifera in reduction of turbidity Chart-3: Effect of Trigonella foenum-graecum in reduction of turbidity The maximum reduction in turbidity is 58.20% at 8000mg/l, hence the reduction efficiency of Trigonella foenum-graecum is 58.20%. Chitti Ramamurthy et al. studied the reduction of turbidity of pond water was due to phytochemical compounds (Plant sterol and steroid) which are present in the Trigonella foenum-graecum. [7] Efficiency of Moringa oleifera is determined by optimum dosage of coagulant with optimum ph of dairy wastewater. By the effect of Moringa Oleifera coagulant the reduction of turbidity is 61.60 % at COD value of 8000 mg/l. Chart-6: Effect of Moringa Oleifera in reduction of COD 2015, IRJET.NET- All Rights Reserved Page 1122

The reduction of COD is 65% at 8000 mg/l by optimum dosage of 0.1 gm/ml and optimum ph of 9 for Moringa Oleifera coagulant. 2.3.3. Efficiency of Cicer arietinum To determination of efficiency of C. arietinum, the optimum dosage and optimum ph can be maintained. Optimum dosage is 0.1gm/500ml and optimum ph is 10. Chart-9: Effect of dolichos lablab in reduction of turbidity The reduction of turbidity is 71.74 % at 4000 mg/l of COD at dosage of 0.05gm and ph of 7.41. Chart-7: Effect of Cicer arietinum in reduction of turbidity The reduction in turbidity for the dairy wastewater is 78.33 % at 6000 mg/l by the influence of Cicer arietinum coagulant. The Cicer arietinum is more effective than other natural coagulants such as T.foenum-graecum, M.oleifera and D.lablab. Sonal Choubey et al. [9], studied the efficiency of M.oleifera, D.lablab and Cicer arietinum in reduction of turbidity of synthetic turbid water and in the study also Cicer Arietinum is more effective than the other two. Chart-10: Effect of Dolicus lablab in reduction of COD The reduction of COD is from 4000 mg/l to 1000 mg/l which means the percentage of reduction is 75%. 2.4. Comparison of efficiency of natural coagulants in terms of reduction of both turbidity and COD Table-3: Comparison of efficiency of natural coagulants Chart-8: Effect of Cicer arietinum in reduction in COD The reduction of COD is 83.3 % at 6000 mg/l of COD by optimum dosage and optimum ph of Cicer arietinum. 2.3.4. Efficiency of Dolichos lablab The efficiency of Dolichos lablab can be determined with the optimum dosage and optimum ph. The optimum dosage is 0.05gm/500ml and optimum ph is 7.41. SL NO Natural Coagulants 1 Trigonella foenum-graecum % of Reduction of Turbidity % of Reduction of COD 58.20 62.5 2 Moringa Oleifera 61.60 65.0 2015, IRJET.NET- All Rights Reserved Page 1123

3 Dolicus lablab 71.74 75 4 Cicer arietinum 78.33 83 The efficiency of T. foenum-graecum, M.oleifera, C.arietinum and D.lablab in the reduction of turbidity and COD with their optimum dosage at optimum ph value are given in the above table. Among the four natural coagulants, the maximum reduction of turbidity and COD is 78.33% and 83% for Cicer arietinum; hence the Cicer arietinum is more effective for treatment of dairy wastewater. 2.5. Effect of natural coagulant on ph After treatment of dairy wastewater by natural coagulants with the initial ph, Change in ph can be analyzed and it is shown in the below figure. Coagulants 3. CONCLUSIONS The characteristics of untreated dairy wastewater are ph - 7.41, conductivity-2.21ms/cm, COD-10000 mg/l, BOD- 2250 mg/l, total solids-2033 mg/l, suspended solids- 1200 mg/l, dissolved solids-833 mg/l, Turbidity-289.5 NTU. The optimum dosage of T.foenum-graecum, Moringa Oleifera, Cicer arietinum and Dolichos lablab seed powder as a coagulant is found to be 0.05/500ml, 0.1gm/500ml, 0.1gm/500ml and 0.05gm/500ml respectively. The optimum ph of T.foenum-graecum, M.oleifera, C. arietinum and D.lablab are found to be 8, 9, 10, 7.41 respectively. Among the three natural coagulants, the maximum reduction of turbidity and COD is found to be 78.33% and 83% with Cicer arietinum; hence the Cicer arietinum is more effective for treatment of dairy wastewater. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The authors can acknowledge any person/authorities in this section. This is not mandatory. REFERENCES Chart-19: The change of ph due to natural coagulants There is no significant change in ph due to natural coagulants. It is changing in decimal values so it is considered as almost negligible. 2.6. Effect of natural coagulant on Conductivity There is no significant change in conductivity due to natural coagulants. Chart-20: The change of conductivity due to natural [1] M.N.Rao, A.K.Datta, wastewater treatment, Rational Methods of design an industrial practices, Oxford & IBH Publishing Co.Pvt.Ltd, 3 rd Edition, 1999. [2] Onet Crisian, Characteristics of the untreated wastewater produced by food industry Journal of Environmental Sciences, Vol. XV, 2010. [3] C.Ramamurthy,Malige Uma maheswari, Natarajan Selvaganabathy, Evaluation of eco-friendly coagulant from Trigonella foenum-gracecum seed", Journal Of Advances in Biological Chemistry, vol.2,pp.58-63,2012. [4] Syeda Azeem Unnisa,Punam deepthi and Khagga mukkanti, Efficiency studies with dolichos lablab and solar disinfection for treating turbid waste waters,journal Of Environmental Protection Science, vol.4,pp.8-12, 2010. [5] Md. Asrafuzzaman, A.N.M. Fakhruddin, and Md. Alamgir Hossain, Reduction of Turbidity of Water Using Locally Available Natural Coagulants ISRN Microbiology Volume, Article ID 632189, 2011. [6] Tasneem banu Kazi, Arjun Virupakshi, Treatment of Tannery Wastewater Using Natural Coagulants International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 2, Issue 8, 2013, pp: 43-47. [7] Chitteti Ramamurthy, Malige Uma Maheswari, Natarajan Selvaganabathy, Muthuvel Suresh Kumar, Venugopal Sujatha, Chinnasamy Thirunavukkarasu, Evaluation of eco-friendly coagulant from Trigonella 2015, IRJET.NET- All Rights Reserved Page 1124

foenum-graecumseed, Advances in Biological Chemistry, vol. 2, pp.58-63, 2012. [8] Parmar Gaurang and Parikh Punita, An evolution of turbidity removal from industrial waste by natural coagulants obtained from some plants, Journal of Environmental Research and Development, Vol. 7 No. 2A, pp.1043-1046, 2012. [9] Sonal Choubey, S.K.Rajput, K.N.Bapat, Comparison of Efficiency of some Natural Coagulants- Bioremediation, International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, ISSN 2250-2459, Volume 2, Issue 10, pp.429-434, 2012. 2015, IRJET.NET- All Rights Reserved Page 1125