System. Stability. Security. Integrity. 150 Helical Anchor

Similar documents
Stability. Security. Integrity.

The Stabilizer TM. Benefits. Supplemental support system for sagging beams and floor joists within a crawl space

New construction Repairing failed or old foundations Retrofit foundations Permanent battered piers Machinery/equipment foundations

How to Design Helical Piles per the 2009 International Building Code

LEGACY REPORT ER ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Reissued November 1, Legacy report on the 1997 Uniform Building Code

Helical Piles and Anchors Hydraulically Driven Push Piers Polyurethane Injection Supplemental Support Systems

SECTION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

Engineered, Time-Tested Foundation Repairs for Settlement in Residential and Light Commercial Structures. The Leading Edge.

Comprehensive Design Example 2: Foundations for Bulk Storage Facility

Figure A-1. Figure A-2. continued on next page... HPM-1. Grout Reservoir. Neat Cement Grout (Very Flowable) Extension Displacement Plate

PTS HELICAL PIERS INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS NOTICE

DIVISION: EARTHWORK SECTION: BORED PILES REPORT HOLDER: HUBBELL POWER SYSTEMS, INC.

High Capacity Helical Piles Limited Access Projects

ATLAS RESISTANCE Pier Foundation Systems

Micropiles Reduce Costs and Schedule for Merchant RR Bridge Rehabilitation

Report on. Wind Resistance of Signs supported by. Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) Pillars

Helical Piles. A Practical Guide to Design and Installation

DESIGN, INSTALLATION AND TESTING OF HELICAL PILES & ANCHORS. Presented by: Donald A. Deardorff, P.E. CHANCE Civil Construction Centralia, MO USA

Designed and Engineered to Perform

Now That s IDEAL. Now That s IDEAL. LISTEN. RESEARCH. DESIGN. DELIVER.

Evaluation Report CCMC R Pieux Vissés Vistech / Postech Screw Piles

A Solid Foundation Solution for Homeowners. from. Our products are made with 90% Recycled Material Down. Right. Solid. GREEN.

load on the soil. For this article s examples, load bearing values given by the following table will be assumed.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA

Step 11 Static Load Testing

Helical Pier Foundation System U.S. Patents 5,011,336; 5,120,163; 5,213,448

ICC-ES Evaluation Report

5/1/2013. Topics. The challenge is to better maintain native characteristics of soils during and after construction

Dynamic Load Testing of Helical Piles

GUIDELINE FOR HAND HELD SHEAR VANE TEST

B.TECH. (AEROSPACE ENGINEERING) PROGRAMME (BTAE) Term-End Examination December, 2011 BAS-010 : MACHINE DESIGN

Hilti, Inc South 122 nd East Avenue Tulsa, OK

HUS-H Screw Anchor. Technical data. Seismic design data. HUS-H Carbon steel screw anchor. HUS-H diameter 8, 10, 14. Seismic design data

Design and Construction of Cantilevered Reinforced Concrete Structures

Page B-1 Hubbell Power Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright 2014 LOAD TESTS

TZ WEDGE ANCHOR FOR CRACKED AND UNCRACKED CONCRETE

METHOD OF STATEMENT FOR STATIC LOADING TEST

Transmission Foundations. helical piles and guy anchors for transmission structures.

Outline MICROPILES SUBJECT TO LATERAL LOADING. Dr. Jesús Gómez, P.E.

EVALUATING INSTALLATION DISTURBANCE OF HELICAL ANCHORS IN CLAY FROM FIELD VANE TESTS

RAM JACK INTRODUCTION

1997 Uniform Administrative Code Amendment for Earthen Material and Straw Bale Structures Tucson/Pima County, Arizona

Soil Screw Design Manual Edition 2

DIRT DWELLING. and your. Pin Foundations Inc., 2008

Pro-Lift Steel Pile Foundation Repair

High Strain Dynamic Load Testing of Drilled Shafts

Diameter. Swift Lift Round Recess Plug. Note: The diameter of the narrow recess plug is the same as the diameter of the round recess plug.

Structural Bolting. Notice the Grade 5 has a much smaller head configuration and a shorter shank then the A325 structural bolt. Rev.

STRUCTURES Excavation and backfill for structures should conform to the topic EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL.

ALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE

DIVISION: MASONRY SECTION: MASONRY ANCHORS REPORT HOLDER: HILTI, INC DALLAS PARKWAY, SUITE 1000 PLANO, TEXAS 75024

CHAPTER 9 LONG TERM MONITORING AT THE ROUTE 351 BRIDGE

Helical Foundation Systems

Objectives. Experimentally determine the yield strength, tensile strength, and modules of elasticity and ductility of given materials.

Development of Guidelines for Anchor Design for High-Tension Cable Guardrails

Up-Down Construction Utilizing Steel Sheet Piles and Drilled Shaft Foundations

Screw Thread Design. Rev

Quick fix for frost heave:

product manual HS-4210 HS-4210_MAN_09.08 Digital Static Cone Penetrometer

Submittal Information

6 RETROFITTING POST & PIER HOUSES

ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design

Chapter 3 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION FEATURES IMPORTANT TO SEISMIC PERFORMANCE

Technical Notes 3B - Brick Masonry Section Properties May 1993

Hilti, Inc South 122 nd East Avenue Tulsa, OK

The following excerpt are pages from the North American Product Technical Guide, Volume 2: Anchor Fastening, Edition 16.

CEEN Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory Session 7 - Direct Shear and Unconfined Compression Tests

CRITERIA FOR PRELOADED BOLTS

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. Fig some of the trusses that are used in steel bridges

Transmission Foundations Case History : Helical piles Hydro One Networks Inc.

PRESENTATION ON REPAIR AND REHABILITATION OF BUILDINGS DAMAGED IN EARTHQUAKE. By H P Gupta & D K Gupta

Activity 2.3b Engineering Problem Solving Answer Key

Detailing of Reinforcment in Concrete Structures

ENGINEERED FOUNDATIONS. Department of Public Works Jeff Hill, PE

FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples

Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology

EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR TECHNICAL APPROVALS

PC-Concrete Injectable Concrete Anchoring and Repair System

Foundation Underpinning Process and Relationship with Groundwater in West- Central Florida

Embedded Parts Introduction - Anchors

Pole Guying More Complicated Than Meets the Eye. NRECA TechAdvantage 2014 Presented by Jason Settle, P.E.

HELICAL SCREW PILES (HSP) CAPACITY FOR AXIAL CYCLIC LOADINGS IN COHESIVE SOILS

Solid Mechanics. Stress. What you ll learn: Motivation

4B The stiffness of the floor and roof diaphragms. 3. The relative flexural and shear stiffness of the shear walls and of connections.

Underpinning Systems 14.1 FOUNDATION REPAIR. Helical Piles

Solid shape molding is not desired in injection molding due to following reasons.

Structural Integrity Analysis

Bolting: Attachment Of The Mudsill To The Foundation

The International Workshop on Micropiles, 2007

Module 5 Couplings. Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

EVALUATION OF THE AQUA WRAP SYSTEM IN REPAIRING MECHANICALLY- DAMAGED PIPES

Installation guide for the SafeLine type anchorage device. Tested in compliance with EN 795: No.: SE-...

Operations and Instruction Manual Might Swivel - Part # Concrete and Steel Anchorage Connector ANSI Z ,000 lbs / 44kn

EXAMPLE 1 DESIGN OF CANTILEVERED WALL, GRANULAR SOIL

USE OF MICROPILES IN TEXAS BRIDGES. by John G. Delphia, P.E. TxDOT Bridge Division Geotechnical Branch

Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical design - Part 2 Ground investigation and testing

Copyright by W. Tom Witherspoon. All Rights Reserved. Soil Stabilzation of Oklahoma, Inc

Vertical Break Parallel (VBP) / Vertical Break Slant (VBS)

How To Design A Foundation

Transcription:

Model 150 HELICAL ANCHOR System PN #MBHAT Stability. Security. Integrity. 150 Helical Anchor System

About Foundation Supportworks is a network of the most experienced and knowledgeable foundation repair and new construction piering and anchoring contractors in North America. With dealers from coast to coast, Foundation Supportworks is focused on training, gathering, and sharing the best practices in the industry. Your authorized dealer is therefore operating with the resources of literally hundreds of years of combined experience. Each dealer is trained, authorized, and certified by Foundation Supportworks. Omaha, Nebraska Foundation Supportworks has major dealer support facilities in Omaha, Nebraska and Seymour, Connecticut. engineering Seymour, Connecticut Foundation Supportworks has both geotechnical and structural engineers on staff for product design, quality assurance of products, and dealer support. Our in-house engineers are available to assist with preliminary designs and provide technical support to engineers, architects, building departments, and general contractors local to the projects. Helical anchors Helical anchors are a factory-manufactured steel foundation system consisting of a central shaft with one or more helix-shaped bearing plates, commonly referred to as blades, welded to the lead section. Extension shafts, with or without additional helix plates, are used to extend the anchor into competent load-bearing soils. Helical anchors are advanced ( screwed ) into the ground with the application of torque. The terms helical piles, screw piles, helical piers, helical anchors, helix piers, and helix anchors are often used interchangeably by specifiers. However, the term pier more often refers to a helical foundation system loaded in axial compression, while the term anchor more often refers to a helical foundation system loaded in axial tension. 2 Did you know? The use of helical foundation systems in construction dates back nearly 200 years. In the 1830 s, the earliest versions of today s helicals were used in England for moorings and for the foundations of lighthouse structures. Today, helical foundation options are gaining worldwide acceptance throughout the construction industry and engineering community due to the versatility of both the product and the installation equipment. In 2007, the International Code Council Evaluation Service, Inc. (ICC-ES) approved AC358, Acceptance Criteria for Helical Foundation Systems and Devices. Helical foundation systems are also now included in the 2009 International Building Code.

General Information Design Considerations Helical anchors are designed such that most of the axial capacity of the anchor is generated through bearing of the helix blades against the soil. The helix blades are typically spaced three diameters apart along the anchor shaft to prevent one blade from contributing significant stress to the bearing soil of the adjacent blade. Significant stress influence is limited to a bulb of soil within about two helix diameters from the bearing surface in the axial direction and one helix diameter from the center of the anchor shaft in the lateral direction. Each helix blade therefore acts independently in bearing along the anchor shaft. Multiple anchors shall have a center to center spacing at the helix depth of at least four (4) times the diameter of the largest helix blade (ICC-ES AC358). The tops of the anchors may be closer at the ground surface but installed at a batter or angle away from each other in order to meet the spacing criteria at the helix depth. Helix blades shall have an embedment depth of at least twelve (12) diameters in the direction of loading (ICC-ES AC358). 2009 Foundation Supportworks helix blade geometry Foundation Supportworks helical anchors feature blades manufactured with a true helix shape conforming to the geometry criteria of ICC-ES AC358. The leading and trailing edges of true helix blades are within one-quarter inch of parallel to each other and any radial measurement across the blade is perpendicular to the anchor shaft. A true helix shape along with proper alignment and spacing of the blades is critical to minimize soil disturbance during installation. Conversely, blades that are not a true helix shape are often formed to a duckbill appearance. These plates create a great deal of soil disturbance and do not conform to the helix geometry requirements of ICC-ES AC358 since their torque to capacity relationships are not well documented. 3

General Information DETERMINATION OF CAPACITY The ultimate capacity of a helical anchor may be calculated using the traditional bearing capacity equation: = [A h (cn c + qn q Where = Ultimate Anchor Capacity (lb) A h = Area of Individual Helix Plate (ft 2 ) c = Effective Soil Cohesion (lb/ft 2 ) N c = Dimensionless Bearing Capacity Factor = 9 q = Effective Vertical Overburden Pressure (lb/ft 2 ) N q = Dimensionless Bearing Capacity Factor Total stress parameters should be used for short-term and transient load applications and effective stress parameters should be used for long-term, permanent load applications. A factor of safety of 2 is typically used to determine the allowable soil bearing capacity, especially if torque is monitored during the helical anchor installation. *Like other deep foundation alternatives, there are many factors to be considered in designing a helical anchor foundation. Foundation Supportworks recommends that helical anchor design be completed by an experienced geotechnical engineer or other qualified professional. Another well-documented and accepted method for estimating helical anchor capacity is by correlation to installation torque. In simple terms, the torsional resistance generated during helical anchor installation is a measure of soil shear strength and can be related to the bearing capacity of the anchor. = KT Where = Ultimate Anchor Capacity (lb) K = Capacity to Torque Ratio (ft -1 ) T = Installation Torque (ft-lb) The capacity to torque ratio is not a constant and varies with soil conditions and the size of the anchor shaft. Load testing using the proposed helical anchor and helix blade configuration is the best way to determine project-specific K-values. However, ICC-ES AC358 provides default K-values for varying anchor shaft sizes, which may be used conservatively for most soil conditions. The default value for the Model 150 Helical Anchor System (1.50 square shaft) is K = 10 ft -1. 4 AREA OF HELIX BLADES Helix Diameter (inches) Helix Area (ft 2 ) 6 0.18 8 0.33 10 0.53 12 0.77 14 1.05

General Information anchor CAPACITY The cross section of a square shaft is very compact which can allow the anchor to penetrate more easily through the soil. This compact shape also reduces the stiffness of the cross section and introduces more potential for buckling. These two factors make square shaft helical anchors better suited for tension loads. Foundation Supportworks, Inc. therefore recommends their use mainly for these types of applications. Square shaft helical anchors (piles) used in compression should be evaluated on a case by case basis by the project engineer. Mechanical Axial Capacity (see note): Allowable Tension = 26.5 kips* technical specifications Outer Dimensions = 1.50 x 1.50 Anchor Shaft Yield Strength = 90 ksi (min.) Coupling Hardware: Ø ¾ Grade 8 Bolt with Nut Available Helix Blade Diameters = 6, 8, 10, 12 and 14 Helix Blade Thickness = 0.375 Termination Hardware: Ø1 Threaded Rod, Tensile Strength = 120 ksi (min.) *The mechanical tensile capacity of the Model 150 Helical Anchor System is limited by the allowable stress levels dictated by AISC for a high strength bolt in double shear. The allowable tensile capacity of the shaft is actually much higher than this Allowable Tension value. Torque Limited Axial Design Capacities based on Ultimate Torsional Resistance of Anchor Shaft = 6,340 ft-lbs**: Ultimate Soil Capacity = 63.4 kips** (with K = 10 ft -1, see note) Allowable Soil Capacity = 31.7 kips (FOS = 2, Allowable System Capacity therefore governed by mechanical capacity = 26.5 kips*) **This Ultimate Torsional Resistance and its corresponding Torque Limited Capacities are based on laboratory test results from an IAS accredited facility and may only be approached in idealized conditions. Plastic torsional deformations can begin in the anchor shaft near 4,600 ft-lbs. This value may be reached and exceeded in the field by maintaining alignment between the anchor and the drive head, limiting impact forces and torque reversal, and reducing the tendency to crowd (push down on) the anchor. Installation through soils with obstructions or high variability may result in impact loading on the anchor. In these cases, achieving high torque values becomes more difficult and a further reduction in the Design Torque Limit may be appropriate. note K = 10 ft -1 is a default value as published in ICC-ES AC358 which can, in many cases, be considered conservative. Higher capacities can often be achieved with site-specific load testing. Allowable capacities based on site testing shall not exceed the Mechanical Axial Capacity. coupling detail The extensions for the Model 150 Helical Anchor System are manufactured with forged, upset ends that are drilled to create a socket and bolt coupling. Direct, sufficient contact of the anchor shaft is much more difficult to achieve within upset couplings than couplings for shafts with machine cut ends. The coupling bolt then acts in double shear for both tension and compression applications. Since FSI recommends that square shaft anchors be used mainly to resist tension loads, this level of precision is not justified. 5

applications 2009 Foundation Supportworks The Model 150 Helical Anchor System provides lateral stability to foundation walls and retaining walls with unbalanced earth pressures. Helical anchors can be installed with hand-held equipment, mini-excavators, skid steers, backhoes, trackhoes, or crane-supported rigs so the installation equipment can be sized for the project. Model 150 Helical Anchor System advantages Predictable capacity Helix blade configuration selected to achieve design embedment and capacity All-weather installation Can be installed in areas of limited or tight access Installation does not generate spoils Clean installation with no messy grout Load tests can be performed immediately following installation Available with optional hot-dip galvanizing for added corrosion protection 6

applications 2009 Foundation Supportworks Foundation Supportworks recommends that all helical anchors be pre-tensioned following installation. Pre-tensioning to the design load minimizes deflection of the anchors and structure as the anchors are put into service. Anchors can also be pull tested or load tested to typically two (2) times the design load or more to identify the ultimate system capacity, better assess soil conditions and soil/anchor interaction, and validate design procedures. 7

Design examples example 1 Soil Type: Lean Clay (CL) Unit Weight (γ) = 115 lb/ft 3 Cohesion (c) = 1,000 lb/ft 2 Friction Angle (φ) = 0 degrees = Σ [ A h (cn c + qn q when φ = 0, conservatively neglect (qn q ) term = Σ [ A h (cn c = 0.53 * 1,000 * 9 + 0.77 * 1,000 * 9 + 1.05 * 1,000 * 9 Authorized Dealer of = 4,770 + 6,930 + 9,450 = 21,150 lbs. = 21 kips Q allowable = 21 / 2 (FOS) = 10.5 kips example 2 Soil Type = Silty Sand (SM) Unit Weight (γ) = 120 lb/ft 3 Cohesion (c) = 0 lb/ft 2 Friction Angle (φ) = 30 degrees = Σ [ A h (cn c + qn q when c = 0, = Σ [ A h (qn q q = γd where d = depth to helix plate N q,30 degrees = 18.4 = 0.53 * 120 * 8.67 * 18.4 + 0.77 * 120 * 8.17 * 18.4 + 1.05 * 120 * 7.67 * 18.4 = 10,146 + 13,890 + 17,782 = 41,818 lbs. = 41 kips Q allowable = 41 / 2 (FOS) = 20.5 kips 150 Helical Anchor System www.foundationsupportworks.com 2009 Foundation Supportworks