CHALLENGING CONVENTIONS



Similar documents
DESIGN OF BLAST RESISTANT BUILDINGS IN AN LNG PROCESSING PLANT

Chapter 3 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION FEATURES IMPORTANT TO SEISMIC PERFORMANCE

SECTION 7 Engineered Buildings Field Investigation

Miss S. S. Nibhorkar 1 1 M. E (Structure) Scholar,

National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying. Principles and Practice of Engineering Structural Examination

4B The stiffness of the floor and roof diaphragms. 3. The relative flexural and shear stiffness of the shear walls and of connections.

REVISION OF GUIDELINE FOR POST- EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE EVALUATION OF RC BUILDINGS IN JAPAN

SEISMIC DESIGN. Various building codes consider the following categories for the analysis and design for earthquake loading:

Current Status of Seismic Retrofitting Technology

SEISMIC RETROFIT DESIGN CRITERIA

SEISMIC ANALYSIS AND RETROFITTING OF R.C.C STRUCTURE

Seismic Risk Evaluation of a Building Stock and Retrofit Prioritization

FOUNDATION TECHNICAL CATEGORY 3 (TC3) AUGUST 2012

PERFORMANCE BASED SEISMIC EVALUATION AND RETROFITTING OF UNSYMMETRICAL MEDIUM RISE BUILDINGS- A CASE STUDY

SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF STRUCTURES

Performance-based Evaluation of the Seismic Response of Bridges with Foundations Designed to Uplift

Seismic performance evaluation of an existing school building in Turkey

Seismic Retrofitting for School Buildings in Japan Nonstructual Seismic Retrofitting

Personal Information. Professional Education

Structural Retrofitting For Earthquake Resistance

DESIGN DRIFT REQUIREMENTS FOR LONG-PERIOD STRUCTURES

Cover. When to Specify Intermediate Precast Concrete Shear Walls Rev 4. White Paper WP004

vulcanhammer.net This document downloaded from

Specification for Structures to be Built in Disaster Areas

! # # % % & () +, & +,,. / 0 % % ) () 3

CE591 Lecture 8: Shear Walls

ASSESSMENT AND RETROFITTING OF EXISTING RC BUILDINGS IN VIETNAM IN TERMS OF EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCES

Stability. Security. Integrity.

Seismic Retrofitting of Existing Structures

SEISMIC DESIGN OF MULTI-STORY BUILDINGS WITH METALLIC STRUCTURAL FUSES. R. Vargas 1 and M. Bruneau 2 ABSTRACT

CEE Earthquake Resistant Design. General Information

LINKED COLUMN FRAME STEEL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE VALIDATION USING HYBRID SIMULATION

EXAMPLES OF SEISMIC RETROFITTING IN JAPAN

TECHNICAL NOTE. Design of Diagonal Strap Bracing Lateral Force Resisting Systems for the 2006 IBC. On Cold-Formed Steel Construction INTRODUCTION

Chapter 6 ROOF-CEILING SYSTEMS

A 38-story design-build steel structure features a staggered-truss frame

REPAIR AND RETROFIT OF BRIDGES DAMAGED BY THE 2010 CHILE MAULE EARTHQUAKE

King Post Wall Information

Methods for Seismic Retrofitting of Structures

Rehabilitation of a 1985 Steel Moment- Frame Building

How to Design Helical Piles per the 2009 International Building Code

Expected Performance Rating System

Prepared For San Francisco Community College District 33 Gough Street San Francisco, California Prepared By

bi directional loading). Prototype ten story

Earthquakes and Data Centers

What is Seismic Retrofitting?

Costs of Base-isolation and Earthquake Insurance in New Zealand

SEISMIC CAPACITY OF EXISTING RC SCHOOL BUILDINGS IN OTA CITY, TOKYO, JAPAN

SEISMIC DESIGN PROVISIONS FOR PRECAST CONCRETE STRUCTURES. S.K. Ghosh, Ph. D. President S.K. Ghosh Associates Inc. Northbrook, IL BACKGROUND

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF BASE ISOLATED STRUCTURES

Seismic Retrofit of Existing Buildings: Innovative Alternatives

Requirements for the Use of PRESSS Moment-Resisting Frame Systems

Seismic Retrofit of Bridges - A Short Course

Design for Nonstructural Components

EVALUATION OF SEISMIC RESPONSE - FACULTY OF LAND RECLAMATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING -BUCHAREST

Module 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS

Tall buildings. Florea Dinu. Lecture 13: 25/02/2014

Optimum proportions for the design of suspension bridge

Helical Piles. A Practical Guide to Design and Installation

Retrofitting By Means Of Post Tensioning. Khaled Nahlawi 1

Earthquake Resistant Design and Risk Reduction. 2nd Edition

S. Gledhill 1 P. Alegria da Silva 2 S. Marks 3

ARCH 331 Structural Glossary S2014abn. Structural Glossary

Draft Table of Contents. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary ACI

Progressive Collapse Analysis and Design Guidelines

ARCHITECTURE. Asst. Prof. Meltem VATAN KAPTAN

DESIGN CRITERIA. Determination of earthquake demand. Building importance level. Component categories SEISMICALLY RESILIENT NON-STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS

Rigid and Braced Frames

Five reasons buildings fail in an earthquake and how to avoid them

SECTION 5 ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS SPANS DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: BRYAN ALLRED

Worked Example 2 (Version 1) Design of concrete cantilever retaining walls to resist earthquake loading for residential sites

Breakaway Walls

Modern Codes for Design of Concrete Concrete Structures Presentation Outline

Seismic Risk Prioritization of RC Public Buildings

FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples

PCI Reconnaissance Team Report. Preview of PCI s Japan Earthquake Reconnaissance Team Report

Analysis and Repair of an Earthquake-Damaged High-rise Building in Santiago, Chile

DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATIONS OF TUNED/HYBRID MASS DAMPERS USING MULTI-STAGE RUBBER BEARINGS FOR VIBRATION CONTROL OF STRUCTURES

WORK SCOPE. Domains in which we work:

ASSESSMENT AND PROPOSED STRUCTURAL REPAIR STRATEGIES FOR BRIDGE PIERS IN TAIWAN DAMAGED BY THE JI-JI EARTHQUAKE ABSTRACT

Structural Failures Cost Lives and Time

Geotechnical Building Works (GBW) Submission Requirements

BRIDGE RESTORATION AND LANDSLIDE CORRECTION USING STRUCTURAL PIER AND GRADE BEAM

6 RETROFITTING POST & PIER HOUSES

Perforated Shearwall Design Method 1

Stress Strain Relationships

Seismic Assessment and Retrofitting of Structures: Eurocode8 Part3 and the Greek Code on Seismic Structural Interventions

Seismic Assessment of Engineering Systems in Hospitals A Challenge for Operational Continuity

Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings

CE591 Fall 2013 Lecture 26: Moment Connections

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION INTO THE SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF HALF- SCALE FULLY PRECAST BRIDGE BENT INCORPORATING EMULATIVE SOLUTION

Design and Construction of Cantilevered Reinforced Concrete Structures

Seismic Evaluation and Retrofitting of RC Building by Using Energy Dissipating Devices

The ASCE 7 standard Minimum Design Loads for

Transcription:

CHALLENGING CONVENTIONS How Innovation, Risk and Resilience Creates Better Buildings and Greater Cost Efficiency Jade Kirk BE(Hons), MIPENZ, IntPE, CPEng, QSNdip Managing Director Kirk Roberts Consulting Engineers Limited

RISK RESILIENCE INNOVATION COST EFFICIENCY PRESENTATION OUTLINE: Early engagement, dialogue between disciplines and innovative new technologies, simple structures and performance based design manages risk, builds compliance and leads to costefficient and better buildings.

FEB 22, 2011 Building Collapse Fatalities Engineering Failures Business Interruption Led to: RISK ON THE GROUND Code Updates (Increased Seismic Loads) Conservative Engineering Increased Building Costs Damage Avoidance Design, Innovation

RISK KEY POINTS Volume 1 Summary Recommendations of (V1-3), Section 1 Irregular stiffness, torsion, strength and detailing lead to most failures (Non-Regular Buildings) There should be greater cooperation and dialogue (understanding) between structural and geotechnical engineers Structures should have sufficient strength and ductility to allow them to perform as required Methods of analysis predicting deformations and performance Engineers need to consider deformation compatibility Development of performance-based, low-damage technologies

Conservatism + Risk Aversion + Additional Scrutiny = HighCost Complacency Risk Aversion Major convincing process required (Public perception of Buildings (e.g. Height issue) Fear of being First Inherent Conservatism Building Cost Increases Geotechnical / Foundation Conservatism and Cost Increases Leadership and Appetite for Change RISK THE CHALLENGES

RESILIENCE KIRK ROBERTS THE WAY FORWARD Three Key Engineering Pathways Simple Structures Performance Based Designs New Technologies & Innovation

RESILIENCE SIMPLE SYSTEMS Simple Structures means High Performance and Cost Efficiency Conventional engineering techniques. Simplistic load paths. Create regular buildings with new or old technologies. Limit Torsion, (centre mass/centre of rigidity). Compatibility of stiffness & materials. (One type of lateral system). Localise, control damage and displacements. Improve constructability and timeframes. Invest in complex analysis, BIM modeling and high level documentation (remove risk). Avoids conservatism & over engineering. K.I.S.S. SIMPLE, RESOLVED SYSTEMS Are The Key to Economical Buildings and Structures

PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGNS Risk, Resilience, Innovation, and Economics Analysis and Design Complex Analysis Procedures Deisgn and Detailing Displacement Performance Localise and Control Damage Low-Damage Technology (LDT) (RIM) Displacement Based Designs Constructability Understand Client s Requirements, Social Requirements, Risk, Economic and Asset Protection RESILIENCE In performance-based design, owners and engineers work together to achieve the best possible balance between construction costs and ultimate performance.

RESILIENCE PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGNS Risk, Resilience, Innovation, and Economics Simplicity Conventional Systems. (Repairable, high cost) Precast Shear Walls Moment-Resisting Concrete Frames Moment-Resisting Steel Frame Structures Highly Ductile Systems High Energy Dissipation (Repairable, high cost) Eccentrically Braced Frames (RIM) (Replaceable Links Non-Replaceable Links) Buckling Restrained Braces (RIM) Tension Braced Frames (RIM) Self-Restoring Systems, Highly Ductile Excellent Energy Dissipation, Damage Protection. (Fully repairable, high performance in above-code events) PRESSS Technology (Shear Walls) (LDT) PRESSS Technology (Frames) (LDT) PRESSS Technology (Timber) (LDT) Base Isolation (Most expensive, highest protection) (LDT) PRESSS Precast Seismic Structural System RIM Repair Impact Minimisation LDT Low-Damage Technology

Design Of Ductile Jointed Self-Centering Precast/Timber Structures Performance Based Design (LDT) Low-Damage Technology (Damage avoidance) Low-Damage Structure Performance based System Inelastic Action which absorbs energy through movement of the joint Self-Centering Moment Resisting Joints. Post Tensioned Structural Elements Replaceable Ductile Energy Dissipaters The ability to withstand an earthquake well in excess of its design level (up to 1/2500) INNOVATION NEW TECHNOLOGIES CONCRETE/TIMBER (PRESSS)

Eccentrically Braced Frames (EBF) (RIM) (Replaceable Link) BRB, Buckling Restrained Braces (RIM) Repair Impact Minimisation Highly Ductile System (Link) Inelastic action which absorbs energy through rotation of the Active Link, (Shear) (If designed correctly) Some Self-Centering Properties Localised Damage, building frame protected. Replaceable Active Link. (If designed) INNOVATION NEW TECHNOLOGIES STEEL

Cost Efficiency vs Capital Value vs Asset Protection vs Social Impact Understand Client s Budget (IMPORTANT) The end game Building s Market, fit for purpose Capital Value of the Investment (yield & return) Asset Protection Social requirements of the structure Social Impact COST EFFICENCY COST EFFICENCY

COST EFFICENCY CASE STUDY BARBADOES STREET Cost Efficiency vs Capital Value vs Asset Protection vs Social Impact Barbadoes Street Developments + KR Building ( 3500m 2 ) Performance based Structure 1/1000 Probability of exceedance (code 1/500) Simplistic Structural System Limited Ductile Shear Walls, EBF frames Regular stiffness, efficient structures Simplistic Foundations & Geotechnical design Beam / Grillage foundations system + Raft Differential settlement mitigation Structural system matches geotechnical constraints Low Construction Costs Fit for Market, (Grade B+ to A-) office tenants

Cost Efficiency vs Capital Value vs Asset Protection vs Social Impact 299 Durham Street ( 3900m2) Performance based structure, Displacement based design 1/1000 event (Probability of exceedance, Code 1/500) Able maintain Strength and stiffness beyond 1/2500 event LDT Low-Damage technology PRESSS Shear Wall building Irregular building, efficient structure and stiffness. Simplistic Foundations & Geotechnical design Cost efficient foundation system, designed fit for purpose, (Screw piles) Low damage foundation performance, structural protection. Structural system match's geotechnical restraints. COST EFFICENCY CASE STUDY DURHAM STREET Low Construction Costs Fit for Market, (Grade A+) office tenants

COST EFFICENCY CASE STUDY YOUNG HUNTER HOUSE Cost Efficiency vs Capital Value vs Asset Protection vs Social Impact YOUNG HUNTER HOUSE Victoria Street ( 3000m 2 ) Performance based Structure, Displacement Based Design 1/500 event (Probability of exceedance, Code 1/500), normal structure Able maintain strength, stiffness and low damage beyond 1/2500 event LDT Low-Damage Technology PRESSS technology Timber LVL MRF Building Regular building, efficient structure and stiffness. Self Centering post tensioned LVL-MRF frames Replaceable ductile energy dissipaters Simplistic Foundations & Geotechnical Design Cost efficient foundation system, designed fit for purpose, (CFA Concrete piles, continuous flight auger) Low-damage foundation performance, structural protection. Structural system match's geotechnical restraints, distributed loads Low Construction Costs Fit for Market, (Grade A) Office Tenants

RISK RESILIENCE INNOVATION COST EFFICIENCY SUMMARY TO GO HOME WITH Early engagement, dialogue between disciplines and innovative new technologies, simple structures and performance based design manages risk, builds compliance and leads to cost efficient and better buildings.

OUR CLIENTS NEVER HEAR IT CAN T BE DONE RISK RESILIENCE INNOVATION COST EFFICIENCY