SPLIT PLOT DESIGN 2 A 2 B 1 B 1 A 1 B 1 A 2 B 2 A 1 B 1 A 2 A 2 B 2 A 2 B 1 A 1 B. Mathematical Model - Split Plot



Similar documents
Topic 9. Factorial Experiments [ST&D Chapter 15]

Analysis of Variance. MINITAB User s Guide 2 3-1

1.5 Oneway Analysis of Variance

The Design and Analysis of D-optimal Split-Plot Designs Using JMP Version 6 Software

One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Example Problem

Chapter 19 Split-Plot Designs

Section 13, Part 1 ANOVA. Analysis Of Variance

One-Way Analysis of Variance: A Guide to Testing Differences Between Multiple Groups

Package easyanova. February 19, 2015

Elementary Statistics Sample Exam #3

HOW TO USE MINITAB: DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS. Noelle M. Richard 08/27/14

An Introduction to Statistical Methods in GenStat

Required Trial Management Software Features. Gylling Data Management, Inc.

CS 147: Computer Systems Performance Analysis

Required Trial Management Software Features. Gylling Data Management, Inc.

How to calculate an ANOVA table

One-Way ANOVA using SPSS SPSS ANOVA procedures found in the Compare Means analyses. Specifically, we demonstrate

Regression Analysis: A Complete Example

ii. More than one per Trt*Block -> EXPLORATORY MODEL

Recall this chart that showed how most of our course would be organized:

Outline. RCBD: examples and model Estimates, ANOVA table and f-tests Checking assumptions RCBD with subsampling: Model

November 08, S8.6_3 Testing a Claim About a Standard Deviation or Variance

A POPULATION MEAN, CONFIDENCE INTERVALS AND HYPOTHESIS TESTING

xtmixed & denominator degrees of freedom: myth or magic

Chapter 7. One-way ANOVA

5 Analysis of Variance models, complex linear models and Random effects models

Notes from Design of Experiments

Other forms of ANOVA

Data Mining Techniques Chapter 5: The Lure of Statistics: Data Mining Using Familiar Tools

ESTIMATION OF THE EFFECTIVE DEGREES OF FREEDOM IN T-TYPE TESTS FOR COMPLEX DATA

Introduction to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Limitations of the t-test

Recommend Continued CPS Monitoring. 63 (a) 17 (b) 10 (c) (d) 20 (e) 25 (f) 80. Totals/Marginal

ANOVA. February 12, 2015

How To Run Statistical Tests in Excel

Using Excel for inferential statistics

An analysis method for a quantitative outcome and two categorical explanatory variables.

2. Simple Linear Regression

Applying Statistics Recommended by Regulatory Documents

Class 19: Two Way Tables, Conditional Distributions, Chi-Square (Text: Sections 2.5; 9.1)

Confidence Intervals for the Difference Between Two Means

ABSORBENCY OF PAPER TOWELS

ORTHOGONAL POLYNOMIAL CONTRASTS INDIVIDUAL DF COMPARISONS: EQUALLY SPACED TREATMENTS

One-Way Analysis of Variance

E(y i ) = x T i β. yield of the refined product as a percentage of crude specific gravity vapour pressure ASTM 10% point ASTM end point in degrees F

NCSS Statistical Software Principal Components Regression. In ordinary least squares, the regression coefficients are estimated using the formula ( )

Assessing Measurement System Variation

Poisson Models for Count Data

VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES: TEXT AND METHODOLOGY Q2(R1)

Curriculum Map Statistics and Probability Honors (348) Saugus High School Saugus Public Schools

Statistics for Experimenters

Chapter 13. Fractional Factorials Fractional replicates

MS DATA ANALYSIS EXAM INSTRUCTIONS

Chapter 4 and 5 solutions

Repeatability and Reproducibility

EXCEL Analysis TookPak [Statistical Analysis] 1. First of all, check to make sure that the Analysis ToolPak is installed. Here is how you do it:

(1) These are incomplete block designs (sometimes balanced) that are resolvable.

Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA)

AP: LAB 8: THE CHI-SQUARE TEST. Probability, Random Chance, and Genetics

Factor Analysis. Chapter 420. Introduction

Randomized Block Analysis of Variance

1. What is the critical value for this 95% confidence interval? CV = z.025 = invnorm(0.025) = 1.96

1 Introduction to Matrices

STATISTICS AND DATA ANALYSIS IN GEOLOGY, 3rd ed. Clarificationof zonationprocedure described onpp

The Analysis of Variance ANOVA

Chapter 5: Customer Analytics Part I

Chapter 5 Analysis of variance SPSS Analysis of variance

CROSS REFERENCE. Cross Reference Index Cast ID Number Connector ID Number 111 Engine ID Number Ford Motor Company 109

Fairfield Public Schools

Stat 5303 (Oehlert): Tukey One Degree of Freedom 1

Statistics Review PSY379

INTERPRETING THE ONE-WAY ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA)

Two-Sample T-Tests Allowing Unequal Variance (Enter Difference)

Lecture 2 Matrix Operations

Outline. Topic 4 - Analysis of Variance Approach to Regression. Partitioning Sums of Squares. Total Sum of Squares. Partitioning sums of squares

Component Ordering in Independent Component Analysis Based on Data Power

SAS Software to Fit the Generalized Linear Model

Regression step-by-step using Microsoft Excel

LATIN SQUARE DESIGN (LS) -With the Latin Square design you are able to control variation in two directions.

CHAPTER IV FINDINGS AND CONCURRENT DISCUSSIONS

A credibility method for profitable cross-selling of insurance products

Confidence Intervals for Cp

Mixed 2 x 3 ANOVA. Notes

Statistical Models in R

Using Excel (Microsoft Office 2007 Version) for Graphical Analysis of Data

MATHS ACTIVITIES FOR REGISTRATION TIME

Crosstabulation & Chi Square

Final Exam Practice Problem Answers

DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF LANCASTER MSC IN PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH METHODS ANALYSING AND INTERPRETING DATA 2 PART 1 WEEK 9

Chapter 4. Blocking. 4.1 Types of block

International Journal of Technical Research and Applications e Dr. A. Jesu Kulandairaj ABSTRACT- In the present scenario of the competitive

Math 312 Homework 1 Solutions

Fixed Income Attribution. The Wiley Finance Series

Transcription:

SPLIT PLOT DESIGN 2 Main Plot Treatments (1, 2) 2 Sub Plot Treatments (A, B) 4 Blocks Block 1 Block 2 Block 3 Block 4 2 A 2 B 1 B 1 A 1 B 1 A 2 B 2 A 1 B 1 A 2 A 2 B 2 A 2 B 1 A 1 B Mathematical Model - Split Plot Where X ijk = an observation Source of Variation = the experiment mean M i = the main plot treatment effect B j = the block effect d ij = the main plot error (error a) S k = the subplot treatment effect (MS) ik = the main plot and subplot treatment interaction effect e ijk = the subplot error (error b) i = a particular main plot treatment j = a particular block k = a particular subplot treatment Analysis of Variance Total mrs - 1 15 Main Treatment m - 1 1 Block r - 1 3 Error a (Block x Main Trt) (m - 1)(r - 1) 3 Main Plot Subtotal mr - 1 (7) df 1

Subplot Treatment s - 1 1 Main x Subplot Trt (m - 1)(s - 1) 1 Error b 6 (Block x Subplot Trt + (s - 1)(r - 1) + Block x Main Trt x Subplot Trt) (m - 1)(s - 1)(r - 1) Standard Errors for a Split Plot Design Means Compared Main plot treatments - Subplot treatments - Subplot treatments for the same main plot treatment: - Subplot treatments for different main plot treatments: - or - Standard Error of a Mean M = main plot treatment S = subplot treatment m = number of main plot treatments s = number of subplot treatments r = number of replicates Ea = MS Main Plot Error Eb = MS Subplot Error F. E. Satterthwaite's weighted t value for split plots Advantages: 1. Experimental units which are large by necessity or design may be utilized to compare subsidiary treatments. 2

2. Increased precision over a randomized complete block design is attained on the subplot treatments and the interaction between subplot and main plot treatments. 3. The overall precision of the split plot design relative to the randomized complete block design may be increased by designing the main plot treatments in a latin square design or in an incomplete latin square design. Disadvantages: 1. The main plot treatments are measured with less precision than they are in a randomized complete block design. 2. When missing data occur, the analysis is more complex than for a randomized complete block design with missing data. 3. Different treatment comparisons have different basic error variances which make the analysis more complex than with the randomized complete block design, especially if some unusual type of comparison is being made. Appropriate use of split-plot designs: 1. When the practical limit for plot size is much larger for one factor compared with the other, e.g., in an experiment to compare irrigation treatments and population densities; irrigation treatments require large plots and should, therefore, be assigned to the main plots while population density should be assigned to the subplots. 2. When greater precision is desired in one factor relative to the other e.g., if several varieties are being compared at different fertilizer levels and the factor of primary interest is the varieties, then it should be assigned to the subplots and fertilizer levels assigned to the main plots. 3

2 Column Treatments (1, 2) 2 Row Treatments (A, B) 4 Blocks SPLIT BLOCK OR STRIP PLOT DESIGN Block 1 2 A 1 A 2 B 1 B Block 2 1 B 2 B 1 A 2 A Block 3 1 A 2 A 1 B 2 B Block 4 2 B 1 B 2 A 1 A Mathematical Model - Split Block Where X ijk = an observation = the experiment mean R i = the row treatment effect B j = the block effect (RB) ij = the row plot error (error a) C k = the column treatment effect (CB) kj = the column plot error (error b) (RC) = the treatment interaction effect ik e ijk = the subplot error (error c) i = a particular row treatment j = a particular block k = a particular column treatment 4

Analysis of Variance Source of Variation df Total brc - 1 15 Block b - 1 3 Row Trt r - 1 1 Error a (Block x Row Trt) (b - 1)(r - 1) 3 Column Treatment c - 1 1 Error b (Block x Column Trt) (b - 1)(c - 1) 3 Row Trt x Column Trt (r - 1)(c - 1) 1 Error c (Block x Row Trt x Column Trt) (b - 1)(r - 1)(c - 1) 3 5

2 Main Plot Treatments (, ) 2 Sub Plot Treatments (, ) 2 Sub Sub Plot Treatments (, ) 4 Blocks SPLIT SPLIT PLOT DESIGN Block 1 Block 2 M 1 Block 3 M 1 Block 4 M 1 M 1 Mathematical Model - Split Split Plot Where X ijk = an observation = the experiment mean M i = the main plot treatment effect B j = the block effect d ij = the main plot error (error a) S k = the subplot treatment effect (MS) ik = the treatment interaction effect f ikj = the subplot error (error b) T l = the sub subplot treatment effect (MT) il = the treatment interaction effect (ST) kl = the treatment interaction effect (MST) ikl = the treatment interaction effect e ijk = the sub subplot error (error c) i, k, l = a particular treatment j = a particular block 6

Source of Variation Analysis of Variance Total mrst - 1 31 Main Treatment (M) m - 1 1 Block (B) r - 1 3 Error a (Block x Main Trt) (m - 1)(r - 1) 3 Subplot Treatment (S) s - 1 1 Main x Sub Trt (m - 1)(s - 1) 1 Error b (s - 1)(r - 1) + (m - 1)(s - 1)(r - 1) 6 (Block x Sub Trt + Block x Main Trt x Sub Trt) Sub Subplot Trt (T) t -1 1 Main x T (m -1)(t -1) 1 S x T (s -1)(t -1) 1 M x S x T (m -1)(s -1)(t -1) 1 df Error c (T x B + M x T x B + S x T x B + M x S x T x B) (r -1) [(t-1)+(m-1)(t-1) +(s-1)(t-1)+(m-1)(s-1)(t-1)] 12 7

Standard Errors for Split Split Plot Means Compared Standard Error t Values M means t a S means t b S means for same M t b S means for different Ms t b T means t c T means for same M t c T means for same S t c S means for same or different T M means for same or different T T means for same M and S t c S means for same M and same or different T M means for same or different S and T M = main plot treatment S = subplot treatment T = sub subplot treatment m = number of main plot treatments s = number of subplot treatments t = number of sub subplot treatments 8

r = number of replicates Ea = MS Main plot error Eb = MS Subplot error Ec = MS Sub sub plot error t a = tabular t with degrees of freedom for Ea t b = tabular t with degrees of freedom for Eb t = tabular t with degrees of freedom for Ec c 9