Overview of NASA s Laser Communications Relay Demonstration

Similar documents
Communication Satellite Systems Trends and Network Aspects

Microwave Photonic Systems Inc. Joshua L. Korson & Richard J. Stewart

1. Introduction. FER-Zagreb, Satellite communication systems 2011/12

Second International Symposium on Advanced Radio Technologies Boulder Co, September 8-10, 1999

Physical Layer. Communication Satellites. ECE 453 Introduction to Computer Networks. Lecture 3 Physical Layer II

Data Transmission. Data Communications Model. CSE 3461 / 5461: Computer Networking & Internet Technologies. Presentation B

Frequencies for Mars Local High-Rate Links

Fiber Optics: Engineering from Global to Nanometer Dimensions

8. Communications Subsystem

CARLETON UNIVERSITY Department of Systems and Computer Engineering. SYSC4700 Telecommunications Engineering Winter Term Exam 13 February 2014

SDR/STRS Flight Experiment and the Role of SDR-Based Communication and Navigation Systems

LCTS ON ALPHASAT AND SENTINEL 1A: IN ORBIT STATUS OF THE LEO TO GEO DATA RELAY SYSTEM

VIETNAM ACADEMY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY VIETNAM NATIONAL SATELLITE CENTER CUBESAT PICO DRAGON. Presenter Name: Do Xuan Phong

Small Satellite Attitude Determination With RF Carrier Phase Measurement

EECC694 - Shaaban. Transmission Channel

Satellite Basics. Benefits of Satellite

Public Switched Telephone System

Candidate detectors for space-qualified! time-resolved photon counting! Dr. Michael A. Krainak!

ShindaiSat : A Visible Light Communication Experimental Micro-Satellite

Signal directionality Lower frequency signals are omnidirectional Higher frequency signals can be focused in a directional beam

16 th IOCCG Committee annual meeting. Plymouth, UK February mission: Present status and near future

Unit of Learning # 2 The Physical Layer. Redes de Datos Sergio Guíñez Molinos sguinez@utalca.cl

m Antenna Subnet Telecommunications Interfaces

The NASA Global Differential GPS System (GDGPS) and The TDRSS Augmentation Service for Satellites (TASS)

C-S TEAM. Page 1 of 5

TIMED Mission System Engineering and System Architecture

Wired & Wireless LAN Connections

ViaLight. Communications

Evolution of Satellite Communication Systems

A Fractionated Space Weather Base at L 5 using CubeSats & Solar Sails

Use of CCSDS File Delivery Protocol (CFDP) in NASA/GSFC s Flight Software Architecture: core Flight Executive (cfe) and Core Flight System (CFS)

SAC-C MISSION 2.0 CONAE INSTRUMENTS DESCRIPTION 2.1 MMRS

Computer Network. Interconnected collection of autonomous computers that are able to exchange information

Fundamentals of Telecommunications

DSL Mission Concept at Lunar Orbit

Mobile Computing. Chapter 5: Satellite Systems

Architecture Frameworks in System Design: Motivation, Theory, and Implementation

DEOS. Deutsche Orbitale Servicing Mission. The In-flight Technology Demonstration of Germany s Robotics Approach to Service Satellites

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SYSTEM WITH WORLD-WIDE COVERAGE AND BIDIRECTIONAL COMMUNICATION VIA INMARSAT SATELLITE NETWORK

DEEP SPACE NETWORK SUPPORT OF SMALL MISSIONS. G. K. Noreen* Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California

Overview of LEO Satellite Systems

Development of the Extreme Ultraviolet Spectrometer: EXCEED

Space Export Controls Update

SAN Conceptual and Design Basics

Quantum cryptography

Cabling & Test Considerations for 10 Gigabit Ethernet LAN

An Introduction to the MTG-IRS Mission

Attenuation (amplitude of the wave loses strength thereby the signal power) Refraction Reflection Shadowing Scattering Diffraction

DEMONSTRATIONS OF NEW TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES USING STENTOR SATELLITE

Quest- 1 Satellite Functional Description

Fiber optic communication

Attaching the PA-A1-ATM Interface Cables

From Single to Formation Flying CubeSats: An Update of the Delfi Programme

Not All Bands Are Created Equal

Propagation Channel Emulator ECP_V3

Dawn - Overview, Science Objectives, Mission Progress. Hap McSween For PI Chris Russell

GeoMax GNSS Zenith10 & Zenith20 Series

Chapter 1: roadmap. Access networks and physical media

Sky Monitoring Techniques using Thermal Infrared Sensors. sabino piazzolla Optical Communications Group JPL

ETL Systems. RSSC Dubna July Global Leaders in Satellite RF Engineering & Custom Build ROUTE AMPLIFY SPLIT SWITCH

R2. The word protocol is often used to describe diplomatic relations. How does Wikipedia describe diplomatic protocol?

T = 1 f. Phase. Measure of relative position in time within a single period of a signal For a periodic signal f(t), phase is fractional part t p

communication over wireless link handling mobile user who changes point of attachment to network

Optimux-45, Optimux-45L Multiplexers for 21E1/28T1 over Fiber or T3

F2400 FOM II Series Fiber Optic Modem Technical Manual

Environmental Monitoring: Guide to Selecting Wireless Communication Solutions

Limiting factors in fiber optic transmissions

Loop-O9310 4E1 or 4T1 Fiber Optical Mux

IAC 09 C3.4.5 SUSTAINABILITY ON-ORBIT: SPACE SOLAR POWER AND CLOUD COMPUTING CONSTELLATION TWO EXAMPLES OF INTERNATIONAL OFFSET PROJECTS

24 GHz Point-to-Point 1.4+ Gbps Radio. Datasheet. Model: AF24. High Performance Wireless Backhaul. Long Range of 13+ km

LaserLight Networks Inc.

Recent developments in high bandwidth optical interconnects. Brian Corbett.

Telepresence for Deep Space Missions Project

Loop-O9310 4E1 or 4T1 Fiber Optical Mux

Multiplexing. Multiplexing is the set of techniques that allows the simultaneous transmission of multiple signals across a single physical medium.

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R F (Question ITU-R 157/9) b) that systems using this mode of propagation are already in service for burst data transmission,

NXU RoIP Link to Eliminate Voice-Grade Leased Line

Modeling and Performance Analysis of DWDM Based 100 Gbps Low Power Inter-satellite Optical Wireless Communication (LP-IsOWC) System

AMPLIFIED HIGH SPEED FIBER PHOTODETECTOR USER S GUIDE

RS platforms. Fabio Dell Acqua - Gruppo di Telerilevamento

Chang e-3 s Progress and Achievement 2/2014

LASP Electrical Engineer Group Capabilities

Module 13 : Measurements on Fiber Optic Systems

Network Performance: Networks must be fast. What are the essential network performance metrics: bandwidth and latency

Data Transmission. Raj Jain. Professor of CIS. The Ohio State University. Columbus, OH

LTE Evolution for Cellular IoT Ericsson & NSN

Wireless Technologies for the 450 MHz band

EE4367 Telecom. Switching & Transmission. Prof. Murat Torlak

COLLATED QUESTIONS: ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION

Datasheet. High-Performance airmax Bridge. Models: NBE-M2-13, NBE-M5-16, NBE M5-19. Uniform Beamwidth Maximizes Noise Immunity

Airborne Internet. R.Praveenkumar Department of Computer Applications IFET College of Engineering Villupuram

STEREO Guidance & Control

Chapter 6 Bandwidth Utilization: Multiplexing and Spreading 6.1

NASA ISS Research Academy and Pre-Application Meeting. Erin Beck Mission Integrator August 4, 2010

Satellite Services for Internet Access in Rural Areas 1

LoRaWAN. What is it? A technical overview of LoRa and LoRaWAN. Technical Marketing Workgroup 1.0

Transcription:

Overview of NASA s Laser Communications Relay Demonstration April 2012 Bernard Edwards NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (301) 286-8926 Bernard.L.Edwards@nasa.gov 1

LCRD Demonstration Scenarios Mission Statement Topics LCRD Mission Architecture Leveraging NASA s Lunar Laser Communications Demonstration Two Modulations in Space Flight Payload Configuration Ground Terminals LCRD Higher Layer Protocols Summary 2

The LCRD Project The Laser Communications Relay Demonstration (LCRD) Project is a joint effort between: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory MIT Lincoln Laboratory The LCRD Flight Payload will fly on a Loral Commercial Communications Satellite as a hosted payload Loral was competitively selected LCRD will leverage the knowledge, experience, and technology developed from previous NASA and MIT Lincoln Laboratory optical communications work, especially the Lunar Laser Communications Relay Demonstration (LLCD) LLCD is a short duration optical communications experiment between the Moon and Earth 3

LCRD Demonstration Scenarios 4 Deep Space Direct to Earth or Deep Space Relay Scenarios Use of PPM modulation Demonstration of coding, link layer, and network layer options Near Earth Direct to Earth or Next Generation TDRS Scenarios Use of DPSK or PPM modulation Demonstration of coding, link layer, and network layer options

Mission Statement The Laser Communications Relay Demonstration (LCRD) will demonstrate optical communications relay services between GEO and Earth over an extended period, and thereby gain the knowledge and experience base that will enable NASA to design, procure, and operate cost-effective future optical communications systems and relay networks. LCRD is the next step in NASA eventually providing an optical communications service on the Next Generation Tracking and Data Relay Satellites LCRD will demonstrate some optical communications technologies, concepts of operations, and advanced networking technologies applicable to Deep Space missions 5

LCRD Mission Architecture 6 Commercial Spacecraft Host Flight Payload Two Lunar Laser Communication Demonstration (LLCD) based Optical Modules Two LLCD Pulse Position Modulation Modems Two Multi-Rate Differential Phase Shift Keying Modems based on a MIT Lincoln Laboratory Design Two Optical Module Controllers High Speed Electronics to interconnect the two terminals, perform data processing, and to interface with the host spacecraft Two Optical Communications Ground Stations Upgraded JPL Optical Communications Telescope Laboratory (Table Mountain, CA) Upgraded LLCD Lunar Laser Ground Terminal (White Sands, NM) LCRD Mission Operations Center Connected to the two LCRD Optical Communications Ground Stations Connected to the Host Spacecraft Mission Operations Center

LCRD Leverages NASA s Lunar Laser Communication Demonstration (LLCD) NASA s First High Rate Space Lasercom Space terminal to fly on Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE) Launch: No Earlier than 2013 from Wallops Island on Minotaur V 1 month transfer 1 month lasercom 250 km orbit 3 months science 50 km orbit 3 science payloads Neutral Mass Spectrometer UV Spectrometer Lunar Dust Experiment 7

Lunar Lasercom Ground Terminal (LLGT) at NASA s White Sands Complex (WSC) LLCD Architecture Lunar Lasercom Space Terminal (LLST) 10 cm @ 0.5 W 40-622 Mbps xmt @1550 nm 10-20 Mbps rcv 4@15 cm @ 10 W 10-20 Mbps xmt @1558 nm 4@40 cm Nanowire Detectors 40-622 Mbps rcv 8 Lunar Lasercom Optical Terminal (LLOT) OCTL at Table Mtn. CA Lunar Lasercom Ops Center (LLOC) & Mission Analysis Center at MIT/LL Backup Site (Limited Functionality) Echo RF Ground Station LADEE Mission Ops Center at ARC LADEE Science Ops Center at GSFC LLCD Monitor at GSFC

Lunar Lasercom Space Terminal (LLCD) Controller Electronics (CE) OM, MM control CMD/TLM interface to S/C Optical Module (OM) Inertiallystabilized 2-axis gimbal Fiber coupled to modem transmit and receive Modem Module (MM) EDFA transmitter Opticallypreamplified receiver CODECs and data interfaces Data interface to spacecraft 9

Optical Module (OM) Configuration 2-Axis Gimbal Service Loop Optical Subassembly 10 cm Telescope Small Optics Small Optics Environmental Covers Launch Latch Solar Window Telescope Environmental Cover MIRU 10

Wavelength: 1550 nm Mass: 69 Kg LCRD Optical Terminal (Based on LLCD Optical Terminal) Power: 130 W DC Optical Transmit Power: 0.5 W Telescope Diameter: 108 mm Data Rates: 2.880 Gbps using DPSK and 622 Mbps using PPM MIT Lincoln Laboratory Design Complete LCRD Flight Payload is Composed of Two LCRD Optical Terminals: Two Lunar Laser Communication Demonstration (LLCD) based Optical Modules Two LLCD Pulse Position Modulation Modems Two Multi-Rate Differential Phase Shift Keying Modems based on a MIT Lincoln Laboratory Design Two Optical Module Controllers High Speed Electronics to interconnect the two terminals, perform data processing, and to interface with the host spacecraft 11

Two Modulations in Space Why Photon Counting and Pulse Position Modulation? Extremely photon efficient and thus ideal for long haul deep space communications Reduces the user burden (mass and power) in Near Earth applications such as Sensor Webs However, high rate utility in Near Earth applications is problematic due to lack of photon counting detector for space For example, baseline for the Lunar demonstration (LLCD) is 622 Mbps on the downlink, but only 10 Mbps on the uplink Why Differential Phase Shift Keying? Less photon efficient compared to photon counting PPM, but can easily be space qualified at high data rates For example, for a 100 Mbps uplink, using DPSK is significantly less efficient than a comparable PPM link to a photon counter detector in space. Allows growth for Near Earth applications to 10 s of Gbps 12

LCRD Flight Payload Block Diagram LCRD ST S/C S/C Controller High-Speed Electronics Module Interface Power Controller Electronics 1 Data Processing Unit (PDU) & Memory Controller Electronics 2 DPSK Modem 1 PPM Modem 1 DPSK Modem 2 PPM Modem 2 Electronics OE Components Electronics OE Components Electronics OE Components Electronics OE Components Optical Module 1 Optical Module 2 13 PPM Uplink 20 Mb/s DPSK (Bi-directional) 1.25 Gb/s PPM Downlink 622 Mb/s To/From Ground Station 1 PPM Uplink 20 Mb/s DPSK (Bi-directional) 1.25 Gb/s PPM Downlink 622 Mb/s To/From Ground Station 2

Optical Module Subassemblies via Commercial Industry Optical Subassembly Be primary & secondary mirror, small optics bench, Be structure Inertially Stable Platform Based on ATA MIRU * Gimbal & Latch Two axis gimbal based on Moog rotary actuators Solar Window Assembly Subassemblies built & tested at vendor sites Vendors being qualified by MIT Lincoln Laboratory LCRD Optical Modules assembled, integrated & tested at NASA s Goddard Space Flight Center * 14 ATA = Applied Technology Associates, MIRU = Magento-hydrodynamic Inertial Reference Unit

Minimum of Two Ground Stations LCRD will upgrade the Lunar Laser Communications Demonstration (LLCD) Ground Terminal developed by MIT Lincoln Laboratory This is an array of small telescopes with a photon counter for PPM Adaptive Optics and support for DPSK will be added JPL will upgrade the JPL Optical Communications Telescope Laboratory (OCTL) to form the LCRD Optical Ground Stations (LOGS) This is a single large telescope design Adaptive Optics and support for DPSK will be added All stations will have atmospheric monitoring capability to validate optical link performance models over a variety of atmospheric and background conditions 15

LCRD Will Upgrade the LLCD LLGT System Mount and optics subsystems Designed and fabricated by MITLL Adaptive Optics will be added Modem and control subsystems Designed and fabricated by MITLL Uses a Photon Counter Detector for the PPM link DPSK Modem will be added Housed in 40-foot shipping container 16 Interconnected via electrical cables and optical fibers. To be assembled and tested at MITLL, then partly disassembled and reassembled later at the ground station location.

LCRD Optical Ground Station (LOGS) Goals and Technologies LCRD will enhance JPL s existing Optical Communications Telescope Laboratory to support a high bandwidth optical communications link with a GEO satellite Technologies Instruments to monitor sky and atmospheric conditions Adaptive optics correction of atmospheric turbulence effects Remote ground station control capability Deep space (PPM) and near-earth (DPSK) modulation formats System to support safe laser beam propagation through navigable air and near-earth space Network protocols to ensure data distribution and delivery Optical Communications Telescope Laboratory (OCTL) 17

LCRD Optical Ground Station (LOGS) High Level Conceptual Design UPS Electrical Power ENCLOSURE Data Processor DPSK receiver PPM Receiver Adaptive Optics System Transmit- Receive Telescope Data Storage & Transfer PPM Uplink DPSK Uplink Telescope pointing control MASS/DIMM Solar scintillometer Outdoor laser safety system Data Formatter Data source 18 All sky Imager & solar photometer Weather station

LCRD Higher Layer Protocol Deep Space Applicability Mars Relay Scenario Concept LCRD includes technology development and demonstrations beyond the optical physical link Delay Tolerant Networking (DTN) protocols will be incorporated onboard at target data rates applicable to Mars or L1/L2 relay trunk lines producing flight hardware and software Relay operations without Earth in the loop requirements for user support will be demonstrated developing associated ops concepts, procedures, and flight software 19

Summary 20 The LCRD optical communications terminal leverages previous NASA and MIT Lincoln Laboratory designs The LCRD optical module is based on the Lunar Laser Communications Demonstration (LLCD) optical module The Pulse Position Modulation modem is based on the LLCD design The Differential Phase Shift Keying modem is based on a DPSK modem designed by MIT Lincoln Laboratory With a demonstration life of at least two years, LCRD will provide the necessary operational experience to guide NASA in developing an architecture and concept of operations for a worldwide network LCRD will provide an on orbit platform to test new international standards for both Near Earth and Deep Space missions for future interoperability LCRD includes technology development and demonstrations beyond the optical physical link Delay Tolerant Networking (DTN) protocols will be incorporated onboard at target data rates applicable to Mars or L1/L2 relay trunk lines NASA can go from this demonstration to providing an operational optical communications service on the Next Generation Tracking and Data Relay Satellites

21 BACKUP CHARTS

Benefits of Optical Communications GHz THz PHz Frequency 10 9 Hz 10 12 Hz 10 15 Hz LWIR vis UV Wavelength Satcom bands 0.3 m 0.3 mm 0.3 µm UHF L X K L C Fiber telecom bands Entire Band 0.85 1.2 1.1 ~5 GHz 7 THz 3.9 THz Typical User Band.02-30 30 50 25-300 MHz 50 GHz 50 GHz Features of extremely short wavelengths of IR light Nearly infinite bandwidth (and fiber telecom components to make use of it) Extremely high gain from small apertures System Potential - Extremely high data rates in unregulated bands - Use of extra bandwidth to achieve very high efficiency Very small terminals Improvement Over RF 10 s of THz vs 50 GHz Power delivery efficiency 10,000 2 greater 22

Why is Deep Space Lasercom Different than Near Earth Lasercom? (For constant efficiency signaling at all rates) Mars GEO Moon Mercury Venus 36000 Km 400 million Km 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 db GEO Link (R 2 ) 10 Gbps GEO using present near-earth technology 100 bps Mars 0.25 bps Pluto Need 40 db! 10 5 Gbps GEO required class of lasercom technology 1 Mbps Mars 2.5 Kbps Pluto 23

Efficient Signaling and Coding Lasercom Efficiencies Photons per bit (db) 12 10 8 6 4 2 0-2 -4-6 -8-10 Telecom High-rate lasercom Coherent lasercom Photon-counting Quantum limit Very near quantum limit Does not require extreme spectral or spatial purity Well-matched to pulsed modulation (high peaks pwrs) Note: -7 db photons per bit = 5 BITS PER PHOTON! Example: 8-ary Pulse Position Modulation Avg power Peak power Pulse in one of 8 = 2 3 slots (3 bits) Very powerful Error- Correction Coding and Decoding implicitly deduces when a pulse is missed or when noise fills in incorrect pulses 24