May 23, 2011 Tokyo Electric Power Company



Similar documents
IV. Occurrence and Progress of Accidents in Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations and Other Facilities

(2) Action taken at the main control rooms a. General

Boiling Water Reactor Systems

Fukushima Fukushima Daiichi accident. Nuclear fission. Distribution of energy. Fission product distribution. Nuclear fuel

Roadmap towards Restoration from the Accident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, TEPCO. Progress Status

The integrity evaluation of the reactor building at unit4 in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station

( 1 ) Overview of Safety Measures ( 2 ) Overview of Measures for Attaining Greater Safety and Reliability

Public SUMMARY OF EU STRESS TEST FOR LOVIISA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

7.1 General Events resulting in pressure increase 5

Special Report on the Nuclear Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station

IAEA INTERNATIONAL FACT FINDING EXPERT MISSION OF THE NUCLEAR ACCIDENT FOLLOWING THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION (EPFAQ) NEI REVISIONS 4 THROUGH 6; NUMARC/NESP 007

Dynamic Behavior of BWR

IAEA INTERNATIONAL FACT FINDING EXPERT MISSION OF THE FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI NPP ACCIDENT FOLLOWING THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI

Report. November 2013

Fukushima & Three Mile Island Reactor Accidents: Recovery, Cleanup, Lessons, & Future

Fukushima Daiichi Accident Study (Status as of April 2012)

Fukushima Nuclear Disaster

How To Clean Up A Reactor Water Cleanup

SAFETY EVALUATION OF INDIAN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS. BWRs AT TARAPUR ATOMIC POWER STATION (TAPS-1&2)

Operating Performance: Accident Management: Severe Accident Management Programs for Nuclear Reactors REGDOC-2.3.2

Nuclear power plant systems, structures and components and their safety classification. 1 General 3. 2 Safety classes 3. 3 Classification criteria 3

Overview of the Multi-nuclide Removal Equipment (ALPS) at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. March 29, 2013 Tokyo Electric Power Company

This occurrence is considered to be of no significance with respect to the health and safety of the public.

Contractor s Guide Outage O3 2015

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STANDARD REVIEW PLAN OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

15 April 2015 Nuclear Regulation Authority, Japan. 1. Overview

Loviisa 3 unique possibility for large scale CHP generation and CO 2 reductions. Nici Bergroth, Fortum Oyj FORS-seminar

Development Study of Nuclear Power Plants for the 21st Century

INTRODUCTION. Three Mile Island Unit 2

Belgian Stress tests specifications Applicable to all nuclear plants, excluding power reactors 22 June 2011

Operational Reactor Safety /22.903

AP1000 Overview Westinghouse Electric Company LLC - All Rights Reserved

HOW DOES A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT WORK?

10 Nuclear Power Reactors Figure 10.1

Introductions: Dr. Stephen P. Schultz

July 30, 2012 Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters Government-TEPCO Med-and-long Term Response Council

C. starting positive displacement pumps with the discharge valve closed.

Introduction to Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Advanced Nuclear Fuels

Building New Generation Nuclear Plants Worldwide : AREVA's Experience

Damage of Fukushima Nuclear Accident and a new compensation scheme

Critical Review of the Swedish Stress Tests Report

SOLVING REACTOR WATER CLEAN-UP SYSTEM ANOMALIES USING RELAP5 MOD3.3

Belgian Stress tests specifications Applicable to power reactors 17 May 2011

HEALTH & SAFETY EXECUTIVE NUCLEAR DIRECTORATE ASSESSMENT REPORT. New Reactor Build. EDF/AREVA EPR Step 2 PSA Assessment

Outlook for RWE s nuclear operations. Prof. Dr. Gerd Jäger London, 16 January 2012

SAFETY EVALUATION OF. INDIAN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS PHWRs AT RAJASTHAN ATOMIC POWER STATION (RAPS-2)

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION WASHINGTON, D.C June 1, 2005

TOPIC: KNOWLEDGE: K1.01 [3.3/3.5] Which one of the following contains indications of cavitation in an operating centrifugal pump?

Nuclear Power Plant Electrical Power Supply System Requirements

Application of Nuclear and Aerospace Industry Experience to Offshore Barrier Integrity Management

Published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) number 166 of July 10th 2009 [1]

SAFETY STANDARDS. of the. Nuclear Safety Standards Commission (KTA) KTA Residual Heat Removal Systems of Light Water Reactors.

Introduction to Process Engineering Economics. based on size of major equipment items allow to decide whether to invest in a detailed study

Generic PCSR Sub-chapter 15.4 : Electrical Equipment

URESANDACTIONSCROSS-BORDERNETHER

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION WASHINGTON, DC June 16, 2011

Nuclear Energy: Nuclear Energy

Electronic Diesel Control EDC 16

EU S TRESS TEST SWISS NA TIONAL REPORT

June 27, Scott C. Flanders, Director Division of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis Office of New Reactors

12.5: Generating Current Electricity pg. 518

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON MODERN VVER GEN III TECHNOLOGY. Mikhail Maltsev Head of Department JSC Atomenergoproekt

Generating Current Electricity: Complete the following summary table for each way that electrical energy is generated. Pros:

IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making. System Analysis. Lecturer. Workshop Information IAEA Workshop

Plant-specific safety review (RSK-SÜ) of German nuclear power plants in the light of the events in Fukushima-1 (Japan)

Condensing Economizers Workshop Enbridge Gas, Toronto. MENEX Boiler Plant Heat Recovery Technologies. Prepared by: Jozo Martinovic, M A Sc, P Eng

Government Degree on the Safety of Nuclear Power Plants 717/2013

Heating Water by Direct Steam Injection

CFD Topics at the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Christopher Boyd, Ghani Zigh Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research June 2008

Engineered Media for Removal of Fission Products from Aqueous Streams Abigail Holmquist, UOP - A Honeywell Company

Resilience improvements to UK nuclear power plants

February 19, Senior Fellow, Nuclear Energy Systems & Services Division Power Systems Company

Boiling Water Reactor Power Plant

Results and Insights of Internal Fire and Internal Flood Analyses of the Surry Unit 1 Nuclear Power Plant during Mid-Loop Operations*

Sharing and coordinating the response to disaster relief and restoration

ELECTRODE BOILERS VAPOR POWER INTERNATIONAL

A study into the fuel savings potential by a major rebuild of propulsion system

AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM 1. FFH SPECIFICATION AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM RODIUS

Marine Generating Sets 3.7 to 50 kva

GEH Safety Enhancement Services

THE REPORT ON THE INVESTIGATION OF THE REACTORS AT FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI NUCLEAR POWER STATION (NO. 1)

Insurance Recovery Alert

EMERGENCY RESPONSE FOR THE AREA SURROUNDING THE CATTENOM NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Safety assessment of the Loviisa nuclear power plant

Transcription:

Analysis and evaluation of the operation record and accident record of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station at the time of Tohoku-Chihou-Taiheiyou-Oki-Earthquake (summary) May 23, 2011 Tokyo Electric Power Company

Results of Analysis On 16 th May 2011, Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) instructed to analyze the operation record and accident record of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station before and after Tohoku-Chihou-Taiheiyou-Oki-Earthquake and to evaluate the safety of reactor facilities. This instruction is implemented to plan appropriate first aid measures for the future. This report is submitted under the above instruction of NISA. We estimated the plant situation of Unit 1,2,3 using the operation record and accident record of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station which was submitted on 16 th May 2011.

Data and of Unit1 (1/2) Record Chart Alert Operation Transition Data Data at the time of earthquake and tsunami. Not available after lost of power and signal due to tsunami. Available only for approximately ten minutes after scram. cause unknown White board For thirty minutes after the earthquake reactor facilities before earthquake reactor after scram water level, temperature and pressure of reactor pressure vessel after scram isolation condenser after scram operated at rated capacity spent fuel pool level: full capacitypool temperature25 all controlled rod installed at 14:47 on March 11 th by scram due to the earthquake. average power range monitoroutput decreased rapidly as scheduled. reactor water leveldecreased by void effect after scram maintained normal level without using emergency core cooling system reactor pressuredecreased after scram increased by closing main stream isolation valve at 14:47 on March 11 th.managed by isolation condenser. Water injection initiated at 5:46 on March 12 th by fire pump. automatically activated at 14:52 on March 11 th.deactivated at 15:03 on March 11 th.it is said valve was operated by 21:30. however, it is uncertain whether it was effective or not at the present moment.

Data and of Unit1 (2/2) emergency core cooling system main steam piping and other reactor facilities after scram core of unit 1 emergency diesel generators emission of radiation and radioactive materials no automatic activation until tsunami. containment vessel spray pump was activated to cool down suppression chamber at 15:07 on March 11 th.afterward containment vessel spray pump and core spray pump deactivated due to AC power lost. high pressure coolant injection system deactivated around 20:00 due to DC power lost. alert regarding main steam piping fracture was noted before or after closing main steam isolation valve. However main steam flow of process recorder is 0 after closing main steam isolation valve. Steam flow increase due to piping fracture is not noted in this process. Therefore, it is assumed that alert regarding main steam piping fracture was noted due to the offsite power source caused by the earthquake, and fail-safe closing signal was noted. as results of analysis, after assumed Emergency Isolation Condenser (IC) was stopped, core damage was started in relatively early stage and thereafter, the reactor pressure vessel was damaged. Although the results of analysis, based on the current temperature data and plant data of the reactor pressure vessel, it is thinkable that most part of core is cooling in the reactor pressure vessel. We think that results of analysis show more stern results than current situation. as same as temporarily results of analysis announce on May 15 th lost offsite power source due to the earthquake. At around 14:47 on March 11 th, two Emergency Diesel Generators was functioned. Normal electric voltage was confirmed and necessary electricity was secured. At 15:37 on the same day, lost all AC source. Exhaust stack radioactive monitor noise was confirmed after reactor scram, but it was stable until termination of recording

Overview of Isolation Condenser at Unit 1 of Fukushima Daiichi NPS Isolation Condenser - works to reduce the pressure in the reactor by cooling steam when the reactor is isolated (i.e. the main steam isolation valve is closed). - consists of two systems (A and B). Steam from the reactor is indirectly cooled by the water (cooling water) filled in Isolation Condenser. To the air system 10B From Fire Protection System Isolation Condenser To the air 10A system From Make-up Water System Heated cooling water is released to the air in the form of steam. 3A 2A 1A 4A Reactor Pressure Vessel 2B 1B Main steam isolation valve Reactor Recirculation pump Cooled steam from the reactor goes back to the reactor. Open at activation 3B 4B Primary Containment Vessel

Records on Operation of Isolation Condenser May 11, 2011 Approx. 2:52 pm Automatic activation Automatic activation due to the high pressure in the reactor Approx. 3:03 pm Stop (Closure of -3A and 3B) Stopped so that the change of ration of the temperature in RPV doesn t exceed 55/h (as stated in the procedure manual) 3:10 to 3:30 pm Adjustment of pressure in reactor by A system We estimate it was started-up and operated based on the pressure and the temperature in the reactor 3:37 pm Loss of all AC power 6:18 pm activation (Open -2A, 3A) 6:25 pm StopClosure of -3A) 9:30 pm Star-up (Open -3A) It is said the valve was operated and generation of steam was confirmed, however, it is uncertain how it worked at the present moment. March 12, 2011 1:48 am Failure of fire protection pump was confirmed

Data and of Unit2 (1/2) Record Chart Alert Operation Transition Data at the time of earthquake and tsunami. Not available after lost of power and signal due to tsunami. Available only for approximately two minutes after scram. cause unknown. Data was restored based on the record in the hard disk. White board. Data For thirty minutes after the earthquake. Thereafter, for thirty minutes after aftershocks including tsunami rushed. reactor facilities before earthquake reactor after scram water level, temperature and pressure of reactor pressure vessel after scram reactor core isolation cooling system after scram operated at rated capacity spent fuel pool level: full capacitypool temperature26 all controlled rod installed at 14:47 on March 11 th by scram due to the earthquake. average power range monitoroutput decreased rapidly as scheduled. reactor water leveldecreased by void effect after scram maintained normal level without using emergency core cooling system reactor pressuredecreased after scram increased by closing main stream isolation valve at 14:47 on March 11 th, managed by opening/closing the main steam safety relief valve and the pressure is under control. started up manually at 14:50 on March 11 th automatically deactivated at 14:51 on March 11 th (high water level). Started up manually at 15:02 on March 11 th automatically deactivated at 15:28 on March 11 th high water level. Started up manually at 15:39 on March 11 th at 13:25 on March 14 th deactivated (presumption).

Data and of Unit2 (2/2) emergency core cooling system main steam piping and other reactor facilities after scram core of unit 2 emergency diesel generators emission of radiation and radioactive materials [please refer to the attachment] no automatic activation until tsunami. From 15:00 on March, started up the residual heat removal system pump (RHRSP) and cooled the suppression chamber pool. Containment vessel spray pump was activated to cool down suppression chamber at 15:07 on March 11 th. Afterward, RHRSP and core spray pump deactivated due to AC power lost. High pressure coolant injection system deactivated around 15:31 due to DC power lost. alert regarding main steam piping fracture was noted before or after closing main steam isolation valve. However main steam flow of process recorder is 0 after closing main steam isolation valve. Steam flow increase due to piping fracture is not noted in this process. Therefore, it is assumed that alert regarding main steam piping fracture was noted due to the offsite power source caused by the earthquake, and fail-safe closing signal was noted. lost offsite power source due to the earthquake. At around 14:47 on March 11 th, two Emergency Diesel Generators was functioned. Normal electric voltage was confirmed and it is assumed that necessary electricity was secured. At 15:41 on the same day, lost all AC source. Exhaust stack radioactive monitor noise was confirmed after reactor scram, but it was stable rate until termination of recording.

Data and of Unit3 (1/2) Record Chart Alert Operation Transition Data Data at the time of earthquake and tsunami. Not available after lost of power and signal due to tsunami. Available only for approximately three hours and thirty minutes minutes after scram. cause unknown. There are unknown records. Complete records are not remained. Data are collected using temporarily power source during the period of after earthquake occurred until at around 16:00. reactor facilities before earthquake reactor after scram water level, temperature and pressure of reactor pressure vessel after scram reactor core isolation cooling system after scram operated at rated capacity spent fuel pool level: full capacitypool temperature25 all controlled rod installed at 14:47 on March 11 th by scram due to the earthquake. average power range monitoroutput decreased rapidly as scheduled. reactor water leveldecreased by void effect after scram maintained normal level at stable without using emergency core cooling system reactor pressuredecreased after scram increased by closing main stream isolation valve at 14:48 on March 11 th, managed by opening/closing the main steam safety relief valve and the pressure is under control. started up manually at 15:05 on March 11 th automatically deactivated at 15:25 on March 11 th. Started up manually at 16:03 on March 11 th automatically deactivated at 11:36 on March 12 th.

Data and of Unit3 (2/2) emergency core cooling system main steam piping and other reactor facilities after scram core of unit 3 emergency diesel generators emission of radiation and radioactive materials [please refer to the attachment] no automatic activation until tsunami. Residual heat removal pump and core spray pumps were deactivated due to AC power lost. At 12:35 on March 12 th, high pressure coolant injection system was started up due to lower water level. Since reactor pressure decreased it is stopped at 2:42 on March 13 th. Thereafter, it is assumable that it is deactivated due to DC power lost. alert regarding main steam piping fracture was noted before or after closing main steam isolation valve. However main steam flow of process recorder is 0 after closing main steam isolation valve. Steam flow increase due to piping fracture is not noted in this process. Therefore, it is assumed that alert regarding main steam piping fracture was noted due to the offsite power source caused by the earthquake, and fail-safe closing signal was noted. lost offsite power source due to the earthquake. At around 14:47 on March 11 th, two Emergency Diesel Generators was functioned. Normal electric voltage was confirmed and it is assumed that necessary electricity was secured. At 15:38 on the same day, lost all AC source. Exhaust stack radioactive monitor noise was confirmed after reactor scram, but it was stable rate until termination of recording From around 5:00 on March 12 th, it showed temporarily gradual increase. Since it is assumable that the water level of the reactor of Unit 3 at that time was above flooded level to cover the fuel, increase in dose is effected by the other units at the site.