Cleveland State Community College. Classified Employee Performance Review



Similar documents
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM

Performance Appraisal

County of Orange Department of Fire & EMS Employee Performance Evaluation Company Officer. Hire Date: Period Covered:

Staff Performance Evaluation

City of Sunset Valley Employee Performance Evaluation Form

Part One: Review of Performance Elements Rating Scale

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

University of Mississippi Medical Center Employee Performance Review Form. Employee Position Title: Employee Job Code: Employee Grade:

Performance Evaluation Guide for Classified Staff Employees. Classified Staff Performance Evaluation Program

DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees

ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES

Performance Review (Non-Exempt Employees)

The Bureau of Public Service System PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT

Performance Evaluation Program. for Classified Staff Employees

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL (Non-Exempt)

MILLSAPS COLLEGE ANNUAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION For Exempt and Nonexempt Staff

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM NON-BARGAINING UNIT, NON-MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

Performance Appraisal System to Improve Construction Productivity paper submitted to International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications

F. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM

2015 Performance Appraisal Template Samples

PART II GUIDE TO CONDUCTING A SUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL BEFORE

Employee Performance Appraisal Form

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH Joint Employee Performance Appraisal Form

Ratings Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Improvement Needed

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Instruction Manual. May, 2015 Performance Appraisal Process Local 2324 Represented Employees

University of Maryland Nonexempt Staff PRD Form

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY - PUEBLO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Association of Municipal Administrators The Voice of Municipal Administrators

Date Started Current Position. Instructions

Performance Evaluation Form: Part-Time & Seasonal Employees

POLICE OFFICER (EMPLOYEE) EVALUATION

Employee Performance Review and Development (Non-Exempt)

DALLAS COUNTY NON-EXEMPT PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013

CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM

Performance Appraisal Form

POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS

Writing Performance Objectives for Job Components: A Brief Tutorial

POSITION DESCRIPTION / PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Employee Performance Review. Reference Guide

Cherokee Town and Country Club Front Desk Receptionist. Administrative Employee Performance Evaluation Form

Employee Performance Review

EMPLOYEE EVALUATION WORKSHEET

Boston University Performance Evaluation Program. Administrative Employees Exempt and Non-Exempt

How To Work For A College Of Technology

Employee Self-Evaluation Form

SECTION I GENERAL JOB RESPONSIBILITIES

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Employee Performance Review

INTERNSHIP HANDBOOK. Nonprofit Administration REC 496

Performance Appraisal Policy. Purpose

Employee Performance Evaluation Form - Administrative Staff

2. Describe this employee s important accomplishments during the past year. Please provide examples.

Manchester Community Schools Bus Driver Performance Appraisal

Employee Development Plan

Number of employees who report to level of evaluated:

Town of Sunapee Supervisory Performance Evaluation. Employee Last First Middle. Probationary progress Conclusion of probation

Classified Employee Performance Assessment

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR NON-SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #:

ADAMS STATE UNIVERSITY Performance Evaluation Process Performance Evaluation

Example: Box Elder District Classified Employee Evaluation and Improvement Report

HR09a ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW (Employee)

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ROCKFORD EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

DOUGLAS COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MANUAL (Non-Supervisory Employees) TABLE OF CONTENTS

CONSISTENTLY EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS OF JOB REQUIREMENTS

Performance Management and Evaluation for Administrators and Technical Professionals

INTRODUCTION PART ONE: REVIEW OF PERFORMANCE ELEMENTS

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

Performance Management. Writing Performance Assessments and Goals 2014

STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY

STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PROCEDURE

Salaried Performance Appraisal 1870 South Boulder Avenue Tulsa, Oklahoma

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR NONFACULTY EMPLOYEES BANNER EMPLOYEE ID NUMBER:

Delaware County Human Resources Department Performance Review System Supervisor Guide

Initial Review 6 month Review Annual Other. Immediate Supervisor: Position Title: DRAFT

Exempt Performance Reviews. Date Approved: June 23, 2008 Last Edited: June 3, 2014

Bloomfield College Staff Employee Performance Review

Defiance College FIELD PLACEMENT APPLICATION. Name Student ID # Last First Middle. Local address

Radford University TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM

FOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

PERFORMANCE REVIEW NON- UNIT PROFESSIONAL

TOWN OF NEEDHAM PUBLIC WORKS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION POLICY #419

The University of Southern Mississippi Performance Appraisal Instructions

Faculty Performance Appraisal System Akamai University

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL EMPLOYEE GUIDE

GOAL SETTING and PERFORMANCE REVIEW Form

County of Mono. Performance Evaluation System. Job Performance Expectations and Standards

JOB PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Monroe County Community College Administrators. Name: Position: Supervisor: Evaluation Period:

WINTHROP UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Transcription:

Name: Review Period: Job Title: Reviewer: Note: Place a mark in the appropriate space which describes the performance of the person named, as determined by this appraisal. Use the following codes and definitions. U - Unsatisfactory Performance is not acceptable BS - Below Standard Performance consistently not to standards established for the job. FC - Fully Competent Performance meets the standards for the job E - Excellent Performance exceeds the standards for the job. S - Superior. Performance consistently exceeds the standards for the job. Factor Appraised U BS FC E S Comments I. Dependability II. Quality of Work III. Quantity of Work IV. Job Knowledge V. Interpersonal Relations VI.. Safety Overall Rating Unsatisfactory Below Standard Fully Competent Excellent Superior Reviewer

SECTION A - (Rating Factors, 1 lowest, 5 highest) FACTOR I: DEPENDABILITY - Conformance to policies and procedures 1. Employee is knowledgeable and observant of rules concerning working hours. 2. Supervisor is notified promptly in the event of absence or tardiness. 3. Employee is not abusive of sick leave taken. 4. Employee is willing to work after regular office hours when the need arises. 5. Employee is supportive of the Quality Enhancement Plan of the college. Rating for Factor I (1+2+3+4+5) divided by 5. FACTOR II: QUALITY OF WORK - How well the assigned duties are performed. 1. Employee's work is accurate, neat and with minimal error. 2. Employee demonstrates thoroughness in completion of work assigned. 3. Employee completes job assignments without excessive supervision. 4. Employee controls waste and efficiently uses materials. 5. Employee accepts additional responsibility when assigned. Rating for Factor II (1+2+3+4+5) divided by 5. FACTOR III: QUANTITY OF WORK - How much work is accomplished by the employee. 1. Employee consistently meets work requirements. 2. Employee begins and completes work assigned promptly and on schedule. 3. Employee identifies and uses work methods to increase productivity and efficiency. 4. Personal matters, telephone calls, etc. do not interfere with employee productivity. 5. Employee demonstrates consistency in the amount of work produced. Rating for Factor III (1+2+3+4+5) divided by 5. FACTOR IV: JOB KNOWLEDGE - This factor involves the application and use of basic skills and on the job experience to perform his/her duties. 1. Employee performs the job duties assigned and understands their job description. 2. Employee applies new developments and training to the job duties assigned. 3. Employee pursues self development through continued education and on-the-job training when available. 4. Employee's technical/analytical skills allow for independent decision making in completing assignments. 5. Employee submits required reports and documents that are accurate, legible and contain all necessary information. Rating for Factor IV (1 +2+3+4+5) divided by 5. Name: 2

FACTOR V: INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS 1. Employee is courteous and respectful when dealing with the public, and respects the cultural diversity of the college community. 2. The employee maintains good relations with supervisor, other employees, and students. 3. Employee maintains a positive attitude toward work and Cleveland State Community College as a whole. 4. The employee uses sound judgment in the performance of his/her duties. 5. Employee displays patience and control when confronted with stressful situations. Rating for Factor V (1+2+3+4+5) divided by 5. FACTOR VI: SAFETY 1. Employee exercises routine caution and practices the proper safety procedures in the operation of equipment. 2. Employee uses proper equipment to complete the job assignment. 3. The employee identifies and reports safety hazards to the appropriate supervisor. 4. Employee operates and maintains equipment/vehicles safely. 5. Employee adheres to and promotes Cleveland State s safety policies and procedures. Rating for Factor VI (1 +2+3+4+5) divided by 5. 3

SECTION B - OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING Rating Weights Total Factor I X.15 = Dependability Factor II X.25 = Quality of Work Factor III X.05 = Quantity of Work Factor IV X.25 = Job Knowledge Factor V X.25 = Interpersonal Relations Factor VI X.05 = Safety (Percentage Must Total 100 Percent) Total (Term which best describes employee's performance from those listed below in the performance rating. Check term which applies from the total score shown above.) Performance Rating Unsatisfactory 0.00 1.99 Below Standard 2.00 2.99 Fully Competent 3.00 4.25 Excellent 4.26 4.65 Superior 4.66 and above 4

Name: SECTION C - EMPLOYEE COMMENTS 1. Have your job duties and responsibilities been clearly explained to you? 2. Is there any area of your job with which you are having difficulties? 3. Is there anything your supervisor can do to assist you in your work? 5

SECTION D - SUPERVISORY COMMENTS 1. Briefly relate any significant accomplishments during the performance review period. 2. In what areas of performance could the employee improve? 3. What action plans and objectives have been discussed and agreed upon for the next performance review? 6

CERTIFICATION AND APPROVALS CERTIFICATION OF REVIEWER - I certify that this review constitutes my best judgment of the job performance of this employee, and is based on personal knowledge of his/her work. Signature of Reviewer: Title: REVIEW BY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL- I certify that I have carefully reviewed this performance review and informed the reviewer of any inconsistencies/errors noted and/or lack of required documentation as given on this form. I understand that, if I do not agree with the rating, I will state my disagreement in the comments section. Supervisor s Signature: Next Level Supervisor: VP or Dean s Signature: REVIEW BY EMPLOYEE - I certify that I have reviewed this performance review and that it has been discussed with me. If I disagree with this performance review, I will use the comments section to state my concern. (Please use additional pages if necessary). Name of employee (please print) Signature of Employee: 7