Major Hazard Plant ( Seveso Installations)



Similar documents
Seveso basic principles and tools. EU Seveso Directive. Main principles and tools for application. Page 1

Consequence Analysis: Comparison of Methodologies under API Standard and Commercial Software

Overview of pipelines in Europe advantages and disadvantages

On-Site Risk Management Audit Checklist for Program Level 3 Process

QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ACCIDENTS AT WORK IN THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY AND THE SEVESO II DIRECTIVE

Major Hazard Risk Assessment on Ammonia Storage at Jordan Phosphate Mines Company (JPMC) in Aqaba, Jordan

Using CFD in Platform Design

Using the Linear Risk Integral (LRI) approach in pipeline QRA for a better application of risk mitigation measures

CHAPTER 4: OFFSITE CONSEQUENCE ANALYSIS

Do you speak SAFETY?

DEEP PANUKE TECHNICAL NOTE

For further information, contact Penspen Integrity:

APPLICATION OF QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES TO BUILDING SITING STUDIES

Assessment of Hydrocarbon Explosion and Fire Risks. Professor Jeom Paik. The LRET Research Collegium Southampton, 11 July 2 September 2011

CHAPTER 7 RISK ASSESSMENT AND ONSITE EMERGENCY PLAN

Sensitivity Analysis of Safety Measures for Railway Tunnel Fire Accident

ESReDA Working Group on Fire Risk Analysis

The SPE Foundation through member donations and a contribution from Offshore Europe

PROPASAL FROM FOR PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE (For Industrial Risks and Storage Risks)

INSTITUTION OF GAS ENGINEERS AND MANAGERS. Founded 1863 IGEM/TD/2 Edition 2 Royal Charter 1929 Communication XXXX Her Majesty the Queen

A Triple Bottom Line approach to QRA

A Review of HSE s Risk Analysis and Protection Based Analysis Approaches for Land-Use Planning. Final Report

The Behaviour Of Vertical Jet Fires Under Sonic And Subsonic Regimes

MAJOR HAZARDS OF NATURAL GAS STORAGE

Hazard and Risk Assessment

Emergency Isolation Valves at Pump Suction: Application for Flammable Liquids

IGEM/UP/16 Communication 1756

Singapore s Approach to Process Safety Management

3.4.4 Description of risk management plan Unofficial Translation Only the Thai version of the text is legally binding.

DANISH ENERGY AGENCY S GUIDELINES ON SAFETY- AND HEALTH RELATED CONDITIONS ON OFFSHORE INSTALLATIIONS, ETC. HEALTH & SAFETY CASES

EPA RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM RULE TO IMPACT DISTRIBUTORS AND MANUFACTURERS

GAS DISPERSION WITH OPENFOAM

Practical Examples of Fire Protection Engineering Practices and Technology for PSM

Environmental Guidelines for Preparation of an Environmental Management Plan

Guidance on Process Safety Performance Indicators

Safety Assessment for a major hazard facility

Ingredion ANZ Pty Ltd

A Response Surface Model to Predict Flammable Gas Cloud Volume in Offshore Modules. Tatiele Dalfior Ferreira Sávio Souza Venâncio Vianna

University of Paderborn Software Engineering Group II-25. Dr. Holger Giese. University of Paderborn Software Engineering Group. External facilities

A PROGRESSIVE RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS FOR A TYPICAL CHEMICAL COMPANY: HOW TO AVOID THE RUSH TO QRA

RR749. Comparison of risks from carbon dioxide and natural gas pipelines

Explosion of a gasoline vapour cloud formed in a hydrocarbon loaded effluents storage tank 10 December 1999 Arquata Scrivia Italy

Regulation of Natural Gas Pipelines. June 23, 2008

Gas Standards and Safety. Guidance Note GAS INSTALLATIONS SUPPLIED FROM BIOGAS FACILITIES - ACCEPTANCE REQUIREMENTS GAS ACT 2000

USING INSTRUMENTED SYSTEMS FOR OVERPRESSURE PROTECTION. Dr. Angela E. Summers, PE. SIS-TECH Solutions, LLC Houston, TX

University of Nottingham Emergency Procedures and Recovery Policy

WASTE Application Form - Dublin Waste to Energy SECTION J ACCIDENT PREVENTION & EMERGENCY RESPONSE

LPG, Flammable Liquids, Toxic and Corrosive Substances

SAFETY REPORT: MAINTAINING STANDARD AND REVIEWING

Chapter 12 Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (Unplanned Events)

Environmental guidelines for preparation of an Environment Management Plan

SKILLS. Magalie LAMBERLIN Safety and Risk Engineer 1 / 7

Risk Management Tools For Port Security, Critical Infrastructure, and Sustainability. NATO Advanced Research Workshop

Investigations of a Long-Distance 1000 MW Heat Transport System with APROS Simulation Software

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited,

EXPLOSIVE ATMOSPHERES - CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARDOUS AREAS (ZONING) AND SELECTION OF EQUIPMENT

ENGINEERED DRAWINGS FOR PETROLEUM STORAGE TANKS

September 2008 AFC (2) Page 1 of 5. Maximum Size and Aggregate Capacities of Aboveground Storage Tank Systems at Fuel Dispensing Stations

LNG SAFETY MYTHS and LEGENDS

Regulations for bunkering LNG

Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS), Spill Clean-Up

INDUSTRIAL PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE

SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PLAN TEMPLATE FOR BUSINESSES IN DAYTON S SOURCE WATER PROTECTION AREA

NORSOK STANDARD RISK AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ANALYSIS

Controlling Risks Risk Assessment

Risk Assessment Data Directory. Report No March Ignition probabilities

FAQ SHEET - LAYERS OF PROTECTION ANALYSIS (LOPA)

HUMAN FAILURE IN THE ASSESSMENT OF MAJOR HAZARD RISK: A CASE STUDY FOR THE HUMAN FACTORS SAFETY CRITICAL TASK ANALYSIS (HFSCTA) METHODOLOGY

ASME B31.3 Process Piping. Scope of B31.3 Course

QAT - TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE: Domestic Suppliers 1. TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT

DET NORSKE VERITAS. Report Corrib Onshore Pipeline QRA. Shell E&P Ireland Ltd. Report no/dnv Reg No.: 01/ 12LKQW5-2 Rev 01,

Company Header POLLUTION INCIDENT RESPONSE MANAGEMENT PLAN. For [site name] [EPL number]

Population Vulnerability Assessment around a LPG Storage and Distribution Facility near Cochin using ALOHA And GIS

The Control of Major Accident Hazards Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2015

Application for Approval to Construct or Upgrade and Operate a Storage Facility October 2015 CSB CSB13001

Reporting dangerous goods incidents. Guideline (6th edition)

CHAPTER 1: GENERAL APPLICABILITY

Classification of incidents. Code: NT GN

Area Classification Why? Where? How? Who? When?

LNG regasification terminals: comparing the inherent safety performance of innovative technologies

International Format for Material Safety Data Sheets

Process Safety & Barrier Management. Lessons from major hazard industries

Process Safety Management

Annex H. Quantitative Risk Assessment Specialist Report

SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR MAJOR HAZARD FACILITIES - BOOKLET 3: Part 7.17

Is This Combustible Dust?

TOXIC AND FLAMMABLE GAS CLOUD DETECTORS LAYOUT OPTIMIZATION USING CFD

Outline. Background. NFPA 820 Applicability to Wastewater Treatment Facilities. Hazardous Area Classifications. Treatment Plant Area Classifications

MSC/Circ June 2001 GUIDELINES ON ALTERNATIVE DESIGN AND ARRANGEMENTS FOR FIRE SAFETY

Measures adopted for Monitoring Safety of Natural Gas Pipelines

Version: 1.0 Last Edited: Guideline

Waste Oil Collection / Storage

Guide for Preparing SHIPPING PAPERS

Proposed Development Phase IV at CRC Oil Terminal, Tsing Yi - Refrigerated Storage Tanks for Liquefied Gas

QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT - QRA FOR

JOINT CBA AND SIA GUIDANCE FOR THE STORAGE OF FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS IN SEALED PACKAGES IN SPECIFIED EXTERNAL STORAGE AREAS

Mechanical Systems Competency 1.20

PREVENTION of the RISKS OF MAJOR INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS (BEKRA LEGISLATION) GUIDANCE FOR OPERATORS

Transcription:

Major Hazard Plant ( Seveso Installations) Safety Report (Law 334/1999 Implementation of EU Seveso Directive) Ufa, 1-2 March 2005

Safety Authorization Process D.Lgs.334/99 (Seveso II) Preliminary Safety Report New Plant New or modificat.? Modification of existing plant Increase in haz. Subst. quantity? > 25% Safety Report Approval process by CTR (Regional Technical Committe.) on the basis of technical review and compatibility with territory Declaration END no Approved? yes Building Permit (with possible requirements) Safety Report (RdS) Approval Process by CTR Approved? no yes Operating Permit

The Safety Report shall be developed according to specific requiremetns and Table of contents by LAw. It contains: Identification data and Plant Location; General information on plant management and technology; Analisi ad Indici (Risk Indexes) and Historical analysis; Accidental events identification and consequence analysis; Design criteria; mitigation and protection measures

Compatibility The Safety Reports results are judged on the basis of the Ministry Decree 9/5/2001 on Land use compatibility Criteria: Probability of events Damage category Classe di probabilitа degli eventi Lethality Categoria di effetti Beginning Serious wounds lethality Elevata letalitа Inizio letalitа Lesioni irreversibili Wounds Lesioni reversibili < 10-6 DEF CDEF BCDEF ABCDEF 10-4 10-6 EF DEF CDEF BCDEF 10-3 10-4 F EF DEF CDEF > 10-3 F F EF DEF A F correspond to Land Use types (A = highly populated; F = Industrial areas)

Layout

Main Information Plant Operator ( Owner ): Responsible for the Report issue and the Plant Operation Rules and Standards adopted in design Production capacity and hazardous substances present (quantity in storage adn process) Detailed process and safety systems description

Main Information Hazardous Substances: Thresholds (Law) Quantities (Total, Storage, Process) SOSTANZA ALLEGATO I - PARTE 1 Gas liquefatti estremamente infiammabili e gas naturale D. Lgs. 334/99 Soglia Art. 8 (t) 200 Quantitа presenti (t) Totale Stoccaggio Impianto Propilene 11 5 6 Etilene 10120 10000 120 Gas Naturale liquefatto 75200 74,000 1200 ALLEGATO I - PARTE 2 6. INFIAMMABILI 50000 - Gasolio 8 8 Note

Risk Indexes ( Analisi per Individuare Aree Critiche ) Analysis according to specific decrees (for processes and storage) (Ministry Decrees DM 15/5/96 and 20/10/98) Plant divided into Units (homogeneous) Risk index classified according to substances, characteristics of processes, safety systems, specific conditions

The Safety Report to be developed according to Law 334/99 contains: Identification data and Plant Location; General information on plant management and technology; Analisi ad Indici (Risk Indexes); Accidental events identification and consequence analysis; Design criteria; mitigation and protection measures

Safety Analysis - Main Assumptions To define a lower bound for frequency to discriminate between credible and non-credible events (usually 1.E-07 /year). For on credible events no consequence analysis is done; Process generated accidents identified by HAZOP; frequency calculated by Fault Tree analysis; Accidental events related to loss of containment events postulated on the basis of historical data. Usually a set of cases (e.g. two cases considered : hole diameter 5% and 20% of pipe diameter) are considered for each isolatable section; Historical analysis to check past experiences and show if design can avoid past experiences.

Isolatable Sections For each section, process and design data are collected for the probability and consequence analysis

Safety Analysis - Main Assumptions Event Tree (ET) Analysis to identify Accident Scenarios and associated probabilities. The ET analysis considers meteorological conditions, safety systems, ignition sources

Accidental Scenario identification Ignition probability in Event Tree Analysis from literature data: Leak Flow rate Portata del Rilascio Probabilità di Innesco Immediato (kg/s) Rilascio Liquido Rilascio Gassoso < 1 0.01 0.01 1 50 0.03 0.07 > 50 0.08 0.30 Massa Infiammabile (kg) Probabilità di Innesco Ritardato < 100 0.001 100 1000 0.01 > 1000 0.1 Immediate ignition Liquid Gas Delayed ignition Flammable Mass Massa Infiammabile (kg) Probabilità di Esplosione se innescata < 1500 0 1 1500 0.099 0.901 Probabilità di Flash Fire se innescata UVCE Flash Fire

Loss of Containment cases Release cases are considered for Isolatable Sections, where process conditions and inventory ( duration of releases) vary

Frequency Analysis Main Data: PROCESS LINES: Historical data abses, e.g. API 581, E&P Forum, TNO etc. Pipelines: EGIG (European Incident Data gropu for Gas), CONCAWE (for Oil lines) External events (e.g. collisions): probabilistic analysis. Considering actual design and site conditions, including effect of Safety Management Systems

Events Localisation on Map

Consequence Analysis Damage levels defined by Law on the basis of International Literature: Soglie di Danno a Persone e Strutture Scenario Incidentale Incendio (radiazione termica stazionaria) Flash-fire (1) (radiazione termica istantanea) UVCE (3) (Sovrappressione di picco) Elevata letalità Inizio letalità Livello di Danno Lesioni Lesioni irreversibili reversibili Danni alle strutture Effetti Domino 12,5 kw/m 2 7 kw/m 2 5 kw/m 2 3 kw/m 2 12,5 kw/m 2 LFL (2) 0,5 LFL --- --- --- 0,3 bar (0,6 bar in spazi aperti) Rilascio tossico LC50 30 min (4) IDLH (5) 0,14 bar 0,07 bar 0,03 bar 0,3 bar Fireball/BLEVE Raggio fireball 350 kj/m 2 200 kj/m 2 125 kj/m 2 100 m da parco bombole 600 m da stoccaggio in sfere 800 m da stoccaggio in cilindri High Mortality Minor injuries Domino effects

Consequence Analysis Damage distances for each accidental scenario are calculated

Consequence Analysis Mapping Events are mapped on the site to allow assessment of land use compatibility, analysis of domino effects, emergency planning etc.

Compatibility

Risk Contours (UK, Netherlands) Risk Contours can be used to assess the Plant Safety (together with Social Risk criteria)