Geotechnical Investigation Test Report



Similar documents
FINAL REPORT ON SOIL INVESTIGATION

Geotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

COMPENDIUM OF INDIAN STANDARDS ON SOIL ENGINEERING PART 2

KWANG SING ENGINEERING PTE LTD

Geotechnical Investigation using Standard Penetration Test (SPT) in Rangamati, Bandarban and Khagrachari Towns

How To Design A Foundation

SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 3, No 3, 2013

Module 1 : Site Exploration and Geotechnical Investigation. Lecture 4 : In-situ tests [ Section 4.1: Penetrometer Tests ] Objectives

INDIRECT METHODS SOUNDING OR PENETRATION TESTS. Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode

c. Borehole Shear Test (BST): BST is performed according to the instructions published by Handy Geotechnical Instruments, Inc.

King Saud University College of Engineering Civil Engineering Department DEFORMATION OF PARTIALLY SATURATED SAND. Sultan Musaed Al-Ghamdi

Method Statement FOR. Soil Investigation

Chittagong Hill Tract Development Facilities (CHTDF) United Nations Development Programme

1.0 INTRODUCTION SCOPE OF WORK EXECUTION OF FIELD WORK LABORATORY TESTS FINDINGS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION 9

INSITU TESTS! Shear Vanes! Shear Vanes! Shear Vane Test! Sensitive Soils! Insitu testing is used for two reasons:!

product manual HS-4210 HS-4210_MAN_09.08 Digital Static Cone Penetrometer

APPENDIX F GEOTECHNICAL REPORT

GUJARAT NARMADA VALLEY FERTILIZER CO. LTD. (GNFC Ltd) TECHNICAL REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED TDI PLANT AT VILLAGE RAHIYAD, DAHEJ

Pavements should be well drained both during and upon completion of construction. Water should not be allowed to pond on or near pavement surfaces.

SPECIFICATION FOR DYNAMIC CONSOLIDATION / DYNAMIC REPLACEMENT

1 Mobilisation and demobilisation 1 Deep boring sum 2 Cone penetration tests sum 3 Miscellenous tests sum

A study on the Effect of Distorted Sampler Shoe on Standard Penetration Test Result in Cohesionless soil

Site Investigation. Some unsung heroes of Civil Engineering. buried right under your feet. 4. Need good knowledge of the soil conditions

ENGINEERED FOUNDATIONS. Department of Public Works Jeff Hill, PE

Geotechnical Investigation Reports and Foundation Recommendations - Scope for Improvement - Examples

An Automatic Kunzelstab Penetration Test

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FORMULAS. A handy reference for use in geotechnical analysis and design

ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design

BEARING CAPACITY AND SETTLEMENT RESPONSE OF RAFT FOUNDATION ON SAND USING STANDARD PENETRATION TEST METHOD

CIVL451. Soil Exploration and Characterization

JOHNSON STREET BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT

Anirudhan I.V. Geotechnical Solutions, Chennai

DYNAMIC CONE PENETRATION TEST INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL GEOTECHANICAL

Report. Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Easy Access Upgrade Marrickville Railway Station Station Street, Marrickville, NSW

Ohio Department of Transportation Division of Production Management Office of Geotechnical Engineering. Geotechnical Bulletin PLAN SUBGRADES

ANNEX D1 BASIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR REVIEWING STUDIES IN THE DETAILED RISK ASSESSMENT FOR SAFETY

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION FOR GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT GUIDANCE NOTES ON SOIL TEST FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN

Standard penetration test (SPT)

CONSULTANCY & MATERIAL TESTING FACILITY

LABORATORY CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES

Standard Test Procedures Manual

Geological and Geotechnical Investigations for Structure

Work Type Definition and Submittal Requirements

load on the soil. For this article s examples, load bearing values given by the following table will be assumed.

CW 3110 SUB-GRADE, SUB-BASE AND BASE COURSE CONSTRUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

Testing Procedures. Note: Please refer to Table 2 for a list of completed borings.

20 ACRE UBATC SITE ( 650' x 1,350') UINTAH BASIN MASTER PLAN VERNAL CAMPUS. Architects Engineers Program and Construction Managers

PERMEABILITY TEST. To determine the coefficient of permeability of a soil using constant head method.

Appendix D.1. Testing Requirements for Infiltration, Bioretention and Sand Filter Subsoils

Geotechnical Testing Methods II

S OIL C ONSULTANTS LTD

Chapter 4 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION GUIDELINES

INVITATION FOR TENDER FOR SUPPLY OF EQUIPMENT

ASSESSMENT OF SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY FROM INDIRECT INSITU TESTS

TECHNICAL NOTE: SI 01 SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF INSPECTION BODIES FOR SITE INVESTIGATION

Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical design - Part 2 Ground investigation and testing

Soils, Foundations & Moisture Control

FACTUAL GROUND INVESTIGATION

patersongroup Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Residential Development 590 Hazeldean Road - Ottawa Prepared For Ontario Inc.

GUIDELINES FOR GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION OF BRIDGE STRUCTURES. Materials Engineering Report No M (Supersedes Report No.

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING II. Subject Code : 06CV64 Internal Assessment Marks : 25 PART A UNIT 1

23 Royal Avenue London. Geotechnical Assessment Report. Report No. LW September 2014

SITE INVESTIGATION FACILITIES

Tests and Analyses on Shear Strength Increment of Soft Soil under Embankment Fill

REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION BRIDGE STRUCTURE REPORT

TECHNICAL Summary. TRB Subject Code:62-7 Soil Foundation Subgrades February 2003 Publication No.: FHWA/IN/JTRP-2002/30, SPR-2362

How To Prepare A Geotechnical Study For A Trunk Sewer Project In Lincoln, Nebraska

Washington ,

Abstract. Keywords. Pouya Salari 1, Gholam Reza Lashkaripour 2*, Mohammad Ghafoori 2. * lashkaripour@um.ac.ir

GUIDELINE FOR HAND HELD SHEAR VANE TEST

Quality control: Annex-A.

PILE FOUNDATIONS FM 5-134

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

DIRECT PUSH DRILLING.

The Manitoba Water Services Board SECTION Standard Construction Specifications PIPE EXCAVATION, BEDDING AND BACKFILL Page 1 of 11

The Soils and Foundations chapter of the code is divided into the following three major parts:

NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS FOR STANDARD PENETRATION TESTING FOR LIQUEFACTION EVALUATIONS. Jeffrey A Farrar M.S.

Highway 23 Paynesville Richmond Soils Borings, Soils Tests, and Reporting

BUTE Department of Construction Management and Technology

STRUCTURES Excavation and backfill for structures should conform to the topic EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL.

SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised 11/5/13)

CHAPTER 9 SOIL EXPLORATION 9.1 INTRODUCTION

Use of a Reinforced Jet Grout Excavation Support System for a Major Sewer Line Repair

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION. Adelaide Street Pollution Control Plant Outlet Structure Replacement London, Ontario

TENDER NO: PSER:SCT:SNG-C1667:15 VOLUME III PRICE SCHEDULE (REV-00)

Strength Determination of "Tooth-Paste" Like Sand and Gravel Washing Fines Using DMT

WDC Whakatane Central Business District Geotechnical Investigation

SNC-Lavalin Inc. Montcalm Wastewater Pumping Station Upgrades - Geotechnical Report. October 2011

Central Purchase unit National Institute of Technology Srinagar Soil Mechanics Lab of Civil Engineering Department.

SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS

Soil Mechanics. Soil Mechanics

NOTE: FOR PROJECTS REQUIRING CONTRACTOR MIX DESIGN, THE DESIGN PROCEDURES ARE SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT.

How To Work On A Mine In India

Soil Classification Through Penetration Tests

NOTES on the STANDARD PENETRATION TEST

APPLICATION FOR GRAYWATER IRRIGATION SYSTEM PERMIT SIMPLE RESIDENTIAL GRAVITY SYSTEMS, NO STORAGE

Determination of Thermal Conductivity of Coarse and Fine Sand Soils

Transcription:

Geotechnical Investigation Test Report Report No. htsc/rcd/ 3457 Dated: - 20/03/2010 Asphalt Standard Penetration Test as per IS 2131 ------------- IS 6403 Soil Job Card No - 1649 Cement Client/Department M/S PDCOR Ltd., LIC Building, Bhawani Singh Road Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur (Rajsthan) Concrete Location of Site Pushkar, Ajmer (Rajasthan) Aggregates Date of Sampling 15 March 2010 Bricks Lime Date of Laboratory Testing 16 March 2010 Steel Tiles H. S. C. Hi-tech Scientific Corporation B / 11 / 43-44 Automobile Nagar Delhi Bye pass Jaipur.302003 (Rajasthan) Telefax: 0141 2640358 Mobile: 9414073261 Email: ashim@hscindia.in Website: www.hscindia.in 1

SOIL INVESTIGATION & TEST REPORT 1. INTRODUCTION:- The main function of a foundation is to distribute or transmit all loads coming over it to the soil or ground upon which it rests. The knowledge of the characteristics of underlying soil is therefore very essential for safe & economical design of foundations. The performance of supporting stratum depends upon the physical properties of soil type & shape of footing & structure, water table depth etc. 2. CLIENT:- The work of soil investigation for this project was awarded to Hi-tech Scientific Corporation, Jaipur by M/s PDCOR Ltd., LIC Building, Bhawani Singh Road, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 3. LOCATION & CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SITE:- The site for soil investigation is situated at Pushkar, Ajmer (Rajasthan) 4. SCOPE OF WORK:- Field investigation at the site are planned to determine the required characteristics of underlying soil to design the foundations of the proposed structure, the data obtained from these investigations have been analyzed to arrive at the required parameters, mainly the safe bearing capacity of the soil at various depth with respect to the existing ground level. In order to achieve the stated objectives, the stipulated scope of work included following Operations: (1) Transportation of the personnel, plant and equipment to the site of work and with drawing the same on completion of Work. (II) (III) (IV) (V) Drilling two boreholes of 100 mm diameter from the ground level to 6m or up to refusal strata. Conducting Standard Penetration Test in the two boreholes as per Indian standard specification (IS-2131). Extracting undisturbed soil samples and sealing, numbering and preserving them as per (IS-2132). Carrying out following necessary test on the soil samples. 2

Characteristics:- Sieve analysis Natural moisture content Bulk density Specific gravity Atterberg limits Determination of Shear Parameters (VI) Preparation and submission of detailed soil investigation report in duplicate. 5.0 INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROJECT:- This project included geotechnical investigations up to 6m depth or refusal strata for BH-1 and BH-2 as decided by the client. 6.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION (STANDARD PENETRATION TEST-SPT):- The subsurface investigation in the field involves three basic operations: Drilling. Sampling. Conducting the required field test. This is followed by operation in the laboratory for conducting other prescribed tests. 6.1 DRILLING BOREHOLES:- Two boreholes (BH-1 and BH-2) of diameter 100mm were drilled with the help of a posthole auger. The auger was pressed into the soil and twisted. Extension rods were connected to auger to increase the reach of auger inside the borehole, up to the decided depth. Any loose soil was carefully removed from the bottom of the borehole so that the penetration test may be performed on natural grounds. 6.2 STANDARD PENETRATION TEST:- The standard penetration test was conducted in the two boreholes following the standard Procedure as per Indian Standard: IS2131-1981, which specifies the procedure for conducting SPT for soil. This test is carried out using the standard split spoon sampler to measure the number of blows called N value. 3

7.0 LABORATORY TESTS:- In the laboratory, the samples were extracted out carefully from the undisturbed sample tubes, which were collected from the test bore hole. Undisturbed samples were than used to carry out the following tests:- Determination of dry density. Determination of Bulk density. Determination natural moisture content. Determination of Shear Parameters Other tests conducted on disturbed samples are: Sieve analysis. Atterberg limits. Specific gravity test. All test were conducted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Indian Standard IS: 2720, results obtained are presented in Table 2 and Table-3 bearing capacity results based on IS: 6403-1981 Part I 1976 are presented in Table-4 and Table-5. 8.0 RESULTS:- The safe Bearing capacity at depth is presented in Table-1 and is based on settlement criteria and local shear criteria the tested values and the minimum values for the two bore holes. Table no 1: Safe Bearing Capacity minimum of two bore holes Depth Meter Safe Bearing Capacity Recommended Settlement Criteria t/m² Local Shear Criteria Safe Bearing t/m² Capacity t/ m² 0.75 11.20 4.67 4.00 1.5 14.90 8.69 8.00 3.0 30.57 17.63 15.00 4.5 Refusal strata encountered at 4.00m in BH-1 & 3.75m depth in BH-2. 6.0 Limited to 15 T/m² for fine sand. 4

9.0 ANALYSIS OF TEST RESULTS:- The field investigation and laboratory tests conducted over the soil revealed the following conclusions: RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST Table 2 Soil Properties for bore hole-1 S.No. Soil Property Depth m 0.75 1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0 1. Clay & Silt (%) 6.50 6.00 5.50 Remarks 2. Fine Sand (%) 92.50 94.00 93.50 3. Medium Sand (%) 1.00 0.00 1.00 4. Coarse Sand (%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 5. Gravel and Boulder (%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 6. Liquid Limit (%) 24.20 24.10 24.40 7. Plastic Limit (%) ---- ---- ---- 8. Plasticity Index (%) Non PI Non PI Non PI 9. Sp. Gravity 2.679 2.658 2.664 Refusal strata encountered at 4.00m depth. ---- 10. Angle of Internal Friction Ø 11. Av. Bulk Density (gm/cc) 29.00 30.00 31.00 1.602 1.602 1.602 5

Table 3 Soil Properties for bore hole-2 S.No. Soil Property Depth m 0.75 1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0 1. Clay & Silt (%) 4.83 5.00 6.67 Remarks 2. Fine Sand (%) 94.67 94.33 93.00 3. Medium Sand (%) 0.50 0.67 0.33 4. Coarse Sand (%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 5. Gravel and Boulder (%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 6. Liquid Limit (%) 24.00 24.20 24.10 7. Plastic Limit (%) ---- ---- ---- 8. Plasticity Index (%) Non PI Non PI Non PI 9. Sp. Gravity 2.648 2.667 2.642 Refusal strata encountered at 3.75m depth. ---- 10. Angle of Internal Friction Ø 11. Av. Bulk Density (gm/cc) 29.50 30.30 31.00 1.600 1.600 1.600 Bulk density Bore Hole 1 Bore Hole - 2 1.602 gm/cc 1.600 gm/cc 6

TABLE NO-4: Safe Bearing Capacity local Shear Criteria B.H. BH- 1 BH- 2 Depth (m) Width (m) Av Bulk Density gm/cm³ Cohesion t / m² Angle of repose Ø Ø Nc Nq Nr Qnf(t/m²) Qns(t/m²) 0.75 1.5 1.602 0.00 29.00 20.40 15.27 6.74 5.83 10.40 3.47 4.67 1.5 1.5 1.602 0.00 30.00 21.00 15.99 7.24 6.49 18.88 6.29 8.69 3.0 1.5 1.602 0.00 31.00 22.00 17.17 8.08 7.59 38.48 12.83 17.63 4.5 1.5 Refusal strata encountered at 4.00m depth in BH-1. 6.0 1.5 0.75 1.5 1.600 0.00 29.50 20.60 15.50 6.91 6.05 10.69 3.56 4.76 1.5 1.5 1.600 0.00 30.30 21.40 16.46 7.58 6.93 19.99 6.66 9.06 3.0 1.5 1.600 0.00 31.00 22.00 17.17 8.08 7.59 38.48 12.83 17.63 4.5 1.5 6.0 1.5 Refusal strata encountered at 3.75m depth in BH-2. Qs Note: ø Angel of Repose Nc- Nq- Nr- Bearing Capacity Factor W - Water Table Correction Factor Qnf-Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity Qns-Net safe Bearing Capacity Qs- Safe Bearing Capacity Table No 5: Safe Bearing Capacity 25mm Settlement Criteria B.H. 1 2 Depth Bulk density N Corrected Qns t/m² Qs t/m² (m) gm/cc N 0.75 1.602 7 12 10.00 11.20 1.5 1.602 9 13 12.50 14.90 3.0 1.602 19 23 24.04 28.84 4.5 Refusal strata encountered at 4.00m depth in BH-1. 6.0 0.75 1.600 9 15 14.29 15.49 1.5 1.600 11 16 15.15 17.55 3.0 1.600 20 24. 25.77 30.57 4.5 Refusal strata encountered at 3.75m depth in BH-2. 6.0 7

BORE HOLE NO 1 Soil stratum from ground level to refusal strata at 4.0m shows fine sand with quantity of silt varying from 5.50 to 6.50 %. Based on N values it was concluded that soil was loose up to 1.5m depth and of medium density at 3.0m depth. Water table was not encountered during borehole drilling. BORE HOLE NO 2 Soil stratum from ground level to refusal strata at 3.75m shows fine sand with quantity of silt varying from 4.43 to 6.67%. Based on N values it was concluded that soil was loose up to 1.5m depth and of medium density at 3.0m depth. Water table was not encountered during borehole drilling. 10.0 ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY:- Considering the proposed structure and taking in to account the N value an allowable settlement of 25 mm has been adopted for evaluating the net allowable bearing capacity, based on the settlement criterion. Average shear strength parameters have been used for calculating safe bearing capacity from local shear failure criterion. Lower of the two values obtained from settlement and local shear criteria is used in arriving at net allowable bearing capacity of the soil, as shown in Table -1 8

11.0 CONCLUSIONS:- The soil at this site is fine sand up to refusal strata it is classified as sandy soil. SPT N Values reveals that soil stratum is loose from ground level to 1.5m and of medium density at 3.0m. No rock was observed up to refusal strata in BH-1 & BH-2. No water table was encountered up to refusal strata in BH-1 & BH-2. Soil is suitable for strip footing for load bearing wall construction. For column and beam framed structure individual rectangular or square footing or raft footing can be adopted. Remarks: 1. The result is of sample of soil collected through SPT test. 2. The sample will be preserved in our laboratory for a period of fifteen day s only. 3. This report can not be produced for legal purposes. 4. Subject to Jaipur (Rajasthan) Jurisdiction only. 5. This report should not be treated as the endorsement of the sample submitted for testing. Checked and approved Hi-tech Scientific Corporation Dr. R. P. Kashyap M.E., Ph. D, MISTE, MIAH, MIWRS Executive Director 9