EMERGENCY WATERSHED PROTECTION

Similar documents
Wildfire & Flash Flood Recovery Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP) Flood Mitigation Efforts April Fall 2013

Available FSA and NRCS Disaster Assistance Programs Crop Insurance: Prevented Planting and Failed Acreage Considerations Click on title for video

Emergency Conservation Program

Angora Fire Restoration Activities June 24, Presented by: Judy Clot Forest Health Enhancement Program

- POLICY - Disaster Recovery Assistance Program

Post-Flood Assessment

The Teton Creek Restoration Project Summary:

Wildfire & Flash Flood Recovery NACo Justice & Public Safety Symposium January 2014

ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF FUNDING FOR

Emergency Streambank Restoration/Stabilization. Kentucky Division of Water Water Quality Certification May 2010 Educational Assistance

National Operation and Maintenance Manual

CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN TEMPLATE

US Army Corps of Engineers Authorities and Programs

Flood Mitigation in the NYC West-of-Hudson Watershed A guide to Programs, Agencies and Funding Sources for Municipalities and Property Owners

REFERENCE. All National Grid personnel who plan and perform work involving protected water resources are responsible for:

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

Appendix A. Lists of Accomplishments and Project Costs. UMRWD 10 Year Plan Update. Appendix A UPPER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT

City of Shelbyville Site Inspection Checklist

Policy Clarifications on the Eligibility of Water and Wastewater Utility Projects for FEMA s Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation Assistance Grants

30-DAY PUBLIC NOTICE CHELSEA RIVER, EAST BOSTON MASSACHUSETTS EMERGENCY STREAMBANK PROTECTION PROJECT

Index. protection. excavated drop inlet protection (Temporary) Block and gravel inlet Protection (Temporary)

A. Flood Management in Nevada

Federal Assistance for Wildfire Response and Recovery

Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon Creek Watershed. Summary Report 2002

PUBLIC ASSISTANCE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT

Disaster Recovery Managing and Leveraging Multiple Funding Sources

Public Law and Non-Structural Alternatives to Levee Repairs

REPORT TO REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY COMMISSION MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2013 LEECH WATER SUPPLY AREA RESTORATION UPDATE

Prattsville Berm Removal Project. 1.0 Project Location

Construction Site Inspection Checklist for OHC By making use of some simple Best Management Practices (BMPs) a construction site operator can

MITIGATION STRATEGY OVERVIEW

Prepared By: Tom Parker Geum Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2012 Program Report. Agricultural Group Drainage Program

Watershed Rehabilitation Program in Texas

Lesson 5. After a Disaster: Recovery and Hazard Mitigation Programs. Disaster Assistance

CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL

RESTORING streams to reduce flood loss

Chapter 11 Site Rehabilitation and Stabilization

Post-Wildfire Clean-Up and Response in Houston Toad Habitat Best Management Practices

Triangle Alliance Conference DISASTERS & HISTORIC PRESERVATION. October 23, 2009

Stream Restoration Account of Flood and Drought Response Fund Grant Program Guidance May 2014

PERPETUAL STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION EASEMENT Pre-Existing Structure. THIS PERPETUAL STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION EASEMENT is made BY AND BETWEEN.

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA

Chagrin River Watershed Partners, Inc. Cost Analysis of Low Impact Development Best Management Practices

Flood System Repair Project

Preventing Storm Water Pollution: What We Can Do

ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLOOD RECOVERY: 1- YEAR ANNIVERSARY REPORT

How To Know If A Forest Service And Bmd Plan Postfire Rehabilitation And Restoration

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

Mission Creek Flood Control & Restoration Project. City of Fremont, Alameda County

STATE LEVEL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE (NRCS) AND THE NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION

Interagency Burned Area Emergency Response Guidebook Interpretation of Department of the Interior 620 DM 3 and USDA Forest Service Manual 2523

Outlet stabilization structure

SITE-SPECIFIC BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (SSBMP) PLAN/STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) REVIEW CHECKLIST

Various options are discussed below.these low cost, low impact interventions can also be applied as general erosion control methods.

SAMPLE FRACTION MITIGATION CONTINGENCY PLAN FOR DIRECTIONAL DRILLING

Waldo Canyon Fire. Mark Shea Watershed Planning Supervisor August 23, 2012

SITE-SPECIFIC BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST

Community RiskMAP Questionnaire

BRIDGES ARE relatively expensive but often are

Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013

Standards Oversight Council (SOC) Supporting Technical Standards for Urban and Rural Soil and Water Conservation

APPLICATION PROCESS FOR LAND DISTURBING PERMIT

Activity Yes No N/A Notes

Demo Existing Curb Demo Existing Asphalt Roadway Demo Asphalt Saw Cutting Protection Fence - 4 Snow Fence with T posts

LOW INTEREST LOANS FOR AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION

United States Depmiment of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Western Colorado Area Office Grand Junction, Colorado

5.0 OVERVIEW OF FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION MEASURES

King Fire Restoration Project, Eldorado National Forest, Placer and El Dorado Counties, Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

APPENDIX III: EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTION 3 - PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING

Untreated (left) and treated (right) Sierra Nevada forests in Amador County, CA. Photos: Sierra Nevada Conservancy


Table of Contents ESF

Floodplain Connectivity in Restoration Design

CHAPTER 2 CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION

INFORMATION BULLETIN BUSINESS FLOOD PLANNING AND MITIGATION GUIDE ACE GLOBAL RISK ENGINEERING. Flood risk assessment. Introduction

Final Report. Dixie Creek Restoration Project. Funded by Plumas Watershed Forum

Benefits of USDA Programs

The Economics of Culvert Replacement: Fish Passage in Eastern Maine

Florida Division of Forestry

King County, Washington Policies and Practice for the Use of Eminent Domain For Flood Risk Reduction

Animals in Disasters

Transcription:

Understanding the EMERGENCY WATERSHED PROTECTION Program

EWP Program Overview Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) administers the EWP Program EWP responds to emergencies created by natural disasters, such as wildfires & floods

EWP Program Overview (con t) EWP recovery consists of installation of emergency measures designed to: Reduce threats to lives & property from a watershed impairment Provide protection from additional flooding or erosion Restore the hydraulic capacity to the natural environment (based upon pre-event conditions)

EWP Program Overview (con t) EWP recovery measures must be: Acceptable to affected individuals & communities Effective in protecting property & natural resources Economically & environmentally defensible & technically sound

Eligibility Owners of private, public or tribal lands may be eligible for EWP assistance if: The watershed area has been damaged by a natural disaster There is a threat to life or property

Eligibility (con t) Property owners may be eligible for EWP assistance if: The threat to life & property exceeds that which existed before the impairment They are represented by a project Sponsor who applies for assistance

Sponsorship A sponsor can be any legal subdivision of tribal, state, county or local government Sponsors are required to provide legal authority to: Perform recovery work Obtain necessary permits & land rights Contribute funds or in-kind services Maintain completed emergency measures

Cost-Sharing EWP funds can be used for up to 75% of the eligible construction costs of the project Sponsor is responsible for the remaining 25% non-federal share (can be cash and/or in-kind contributions) Federal 75% Local 25%

Cost-Sharing (con t) Examples of in-kind contributions include: Materials Labor Equipment Acquisition of land rights, permits & utility relocation do not qualify as in-kind contributions

Typical EWP Measures (Flood) Restore Stream Capacity Clearing and Snagging; debris removal Stabilize & Protect Streams & Streambanks Structural Jacks strings, Riprap, Stream barbs, gabions, Post & Wire, Pipe Revetment, etc. Vegetative Willow or Cottonwood Plantings, turf mat reinforcement, Brush Mattress, etc. Flood Protection Structural Dikes, Flood Wall (repair only) Non-Structural K-rails, Straw Wattles

Typical EWP Measures (Fire) Land Treatment Mulching, Seeding, Straw Wattles, Check Dams, Silt Fences, Contour Felling or Log Erosion Barriers, etc. Flood Protection Structural (repairs only) Dikes, Flood Walls Non-Structural Straw Bales &/or Wattles, K-rails

Step 1: Rapid Survey Immediately following a natural disaster event that may result in a watershed impairment: NRCS conducts a rapid survey to assess extent of damages & determine initial eligibility

Step 2: Request for Assistance If EWP eligibility/assistance is anticipated: Sponsor submits a letter of request for EWP assistance to the NRCS State Conservationist Sponsor must indicate ability and willingness to fulfill all Sponsor s responsibilities Request for assistance must be submitted within 60-days of the natural disaster

Step 3: Damage Survey Report Once a Sponsor has requested assistance: NRCS establishes an interdisciplinary team to further evaluate the site NRCS completes a Damage Survey Report (DSR) to document the site assessment, including economic, environmental, social & technical considerations

Step 4: Funding Request If the DSR demonstrates EWP eligibility: NRCS requests funding from Nat l HQ Funding provided through emergency congressional appropriations Funding priority (listed in order of importance) Exigency situations Non-Exigencies - Sites with a serious, but not immediate threat to human life Non-Exigencies - Sites where buildings, utilities, or infrastructure are threatened

Step 5: Design & Construction If funding is authorized for the project: Complete final engineering designs Award construction contract (either through Sponsor s agreement or federal contract) For exigencies all work to be completed within 10 days of receipt of funding For non-exigencies all work to be completed within 220 days of receipt of funding

Example EWP Project Beaver Dam Wash Flood Non-Exigency Mohave County, AZ Damage Assessment

Example EWP Project Beaver Dam Wash Flood Non-Exigency Mohave County, AZ Construction Completed

Example EWP Project Schultz Fire/Flood Exigency Coconino County, AZ Damage Assessment

Example EWP Project Schultz Fire/Flood Exigency Coconino County, AZ Construction Completed

EWP Program THANK YOU! QUESTIONS?