How To Manage Ppr

Transcription

1

2 Dr Giancarlo Ferrari (FAO) Dr Nadège Leboucq (OIE) Members of the GF TADs PPR Working Group **** PPR Monitoring

3 A Companion Tool of the Global Strategy for the Control and Eradication of PPR to monitor its proper implementation and assess progress PPR MONITORING and Assessment TOOL (PMAT) A Companion Tool of the (Can be used as a standalone Tool) 3

4 3 components PPR control and eradication Reinforcement of VS PMAT focus Combined control of other TADs 3 levels of intervention National Regional Global 4

5 is based on four different stages identified in the PPR Global Strategy The Stages correspond to a combination of decreasing levels of epidemiological risk and increasing levels of prevention and control 5

6 is based on five technical elements identified in the PPR Global Strategy Diagnostic Surveillance Prevention and control Legal framework Stakeholder involvement 6

7 is based on the Enabling Environment concept, whereby efficient VS are indispensable for the successful and sustainable implementation of PPR (and other major TADs) prevention and control activities Therefore, VS capacity must be reinforced as the country moves along the PPR Stages ( progressive institutionalisation of PPR prevention and control ) 7

8 Each Stage is described by the following aspects: Enabling environment and Prevention & control of other SR diseases Tools (focused use in the specific context of the stage) Epidemiological situation PPR Stage PPR Outcomes and Activities Focus of the Stage (objective and expected results specific to this stage) Specific objectives linked to the 5 technical elements 8

9 Each Stage is described by the following aspects: Enabling environment and Prevention & control of other SR diseases Tools (focused use in the specific context of the stage) Epidemiological situation PPR Stage PPR Outcomes and Activities Focus of the Stage (objective and expected results specific to this stage) Specific objectives linked to the 5 technical elements 9

10 Each Stage is described by the following aspects: Enabling environment and Prevention & control of other SR diseases Tools (focused use in the specific context of the stage) Epidemiological situation PPR Stage PPR Outcomes and Activities linked to the 5 technical elements Focus of the Stage (objective and expected results specific to this stage) Specific objectives (main features) Relates the five main elements (diagnostic, surveillance, prevention and control, legislation, stakeholders involvement) Activities in a given Stage are appropriate to mitigate the risk in accordance with the evidence provided in the preceding Stage Activities and their impacts are measurable in each Stage The implementation of ALL activities should enable countries to achieve the progressive decrease in the incidence of PPR to the point at which the disease can be eliminated from the domestic animal populations (and wildlife if relevant). 10

11 Each Stage is described by the following aspects: Enabling environment and Prevention & control of other SR diseases Tools (focused use in the specific context of the stage) Epidemiological situation Outcomes PPR Stage PPR Outcomes and Activities linked to the 5 technical elements Focus of the Stage (objective and expected results specific to this stage) Specific objectives (main features) Activities 11

12 Each Stage is described by the following aspects: Critical competencies (for effective performance and good governance of national VS) 33 are of particular relevance to the control and eradication of PPR However, they are also relevant according to the focus of the stage Enabling environment and Prevention & control of other SR diseases Tools (focused use in the specific context of the stage) Epidemiological situation PPR Stage PPR Outcomes and Activities linked to the 5 technical elements Focus of the Stage (objective and expected results specific to this stage) Specific objectives (main features) 12

13 Stage 1 focus To gain a better epidemiological understanding of the presence of PPR CC I.2.A CC I.3 CC II.1.A CC II.1.B CC II.3 CC. II.5.B CC III.2 CC III.3 CCIII.4 CCIII.5.A CCIII.5.B CC IV.1 CC I.1.A CC I.1.B CC I.2.B CC I.6.A CC I.6.B CC I.7 CC I. 8 CC I.11 CC. II.5.A CC II.7 CC II.8.B CC III. 1 CC III.6 CC IV.2 CC IV.7 CC II.2 CC II.12.A 13 CC II.4 CC II.6 CC I.9 CC IV.6 Risk analysis Active surveillance Consultation with stakeholders Preparation of legislation and regulations

14 Objective of the PMAT To qualify countries at the appropriate stage along the step wise approach for the control and eradication of PPR Where? [assessment tool] How? To monitor progress within a given Stage and provide an indicative list of activities to implement in the year to come (annual PPR Roadmap) [monitoring tool] 14

15 Organisation of the PMAT Description part Questionnaire part Way forward part

16 Organisation of the PMAT (descriptive part) Logical framework approach PMAT GCES Outcome X Activity 1 Indicator 1 Target Means of verification Activity 2 Indicator 2.1 Target Indicator 2.2 / Activity n 16

17 A5 Train veterinary officers from central and peripheral level on value chain and risk analysis I5 Number of Veterinarians at central, regional (Province, Directorate, district.) level involved in value chain and risk analysis trained 17 (target: 75% of the staff has received training before 12 months after entering into Stage 1, 100% before 2 years )

18 Organisation of the PMAT (questionnaire part) GCES Outcome X Activity 1 Indicator 1 Target Activity 2 Indicator 2.1 Activity n Indicator 2.2 PMAT Questions 18

19 Questionnaire List of questions: white = PPR specific yellow = VS specific Each question relate to a list of activities (and indicators) Level of achievement Fully Partially Not (not applicable) 19

20 Q2 Q7 Value chains and risk analysis studies have provided a good understanding of hotspots and transmission pathways to an extent that those can be specifically targeted and mitigated (basis for implementing a Risk based strategic plan to move to stage 2) [A5 I5; A6 I6] The VS compile and maintain data and have the capability to carry out risk analysis. The majority of risk management measures are based on risk assessment [CC II.3 level 3] 20

21 Fully achieved Partially achieved Not achieved Not applicable Comments Q2 Value chains and risk analysis studies have provided a good understanding of hotspots and transmission pathways to an extent that those can be specifically targeted and mitigated (basis for implementing a Risk based strategic plan to move to stage 2) [A5 I5; A6 I6] x x A5 and A6 achieved (targets) A5 not achieved (target) or A6 not achieved (target) or Neither A5 nor A6 achieved A5 Train veterinary officers from central and I5 Number of Veterinarians at central, regional peripheral A6 level (VS) on value Identifychain risksandhotspots and(province, I6 Number Directorate, of meetings district.) organized level involved by the analysis transmission pathways using the valuein valueveterinary chain andservices risk analysis to identify trained and (target: involve chains and risk analysis principles 75% ofstakeholders the staff hasalong received the value training chain. before Evidence 12 monthsof after meetings enteringshould into Stage be 1, available 100% before through 2 years ) minutes of the meetings (target: atleastone meeting per year at national level and if possible one meeting during the first two 21 years at each regional level)number of hotspots identified (no specific targets)

22 Fully achieved Partially achieved Not achieved Not applicable Comments Q7 The VS compile and maintain data and have the capability to carry out risk analysis. The majority of risk management measures are based on risk assessment [CC II.3 level 3] x If level 3 Fully achieved If level < 3 partially achieved Addressing PVS results confidentiality issue No PVS Assessment or Assessment older than 3 years request for a PVS Assessment mission

23 Organisation of the PMAT ( Way forward part) GCES Outcome X Activity 1 Indicator 1 Target Activity 2 Indicator 2.1 Activity n Indicator 2.2 PMAT Questions 23 Roadmap Table

24 PPR Roadmap Table for Stage 1 Outcome 2 Please report in this Table the activities above that have been partially or Not achieved at all Activity Timeframe Responsible staff Activity 1 Activity 2 Activity 3 **** PPR Monitoring Train veterinary officers from central and peripheral level on value chain and risk analysis (VS) Identify risks hotspots and transmission pathways using the value chains and risk analysis principles September 2015 March 2016 Mrs xxx Mr xxx Fully achieved Partially achieved Not achieved Not applicable Comments Q2 Value chains and risk analysis studies have provided a good understanding of hotspots and transmission pathways to an extent that those can be specifically targeted and mitigated (basis for implementing a Risk based strategic plan to move to stage 2) [A5 I5; A6 I6] 24 x Neither A5 nor A6 achieved

25

26 How to use the PMAT? [monitoring tool] To monitor progress within a given Stage and provide an indicative list of activities to implement in the year to come (annual PPR Roadmap) Self assessment mode 26

27 How to use the PMAT? [assessment tool] To qualify countries at the appropriate stage along the step wise approach for the control and eradication of PPR External assessment mode (GF TADs Acceptance involving a Regional Advisory Group) 27

28 How to use the PMAT? Gateway to enter the step wise approach Stage 2 Gateway Stage 3 Gateway Stage 4 Gateway Gateway To fulfill: The requirement of the preceding Stage + Requirements to enter the next Stage (GCES) 28

29 How to use the PMAT? 29

30 To move to the next stage, all mandatory questions (Q1, Q2, Q3) must be achieved; this is not the case in this example, the country cannot move to Stage 2 (if external assessment, it can be granted with a provisional status 1 or 2 until all documents are provided and compliant) 30

31 Finalizing the Tool Expert meeting planned before the end of 2015 Objectives: Refine the indicators Refine the targets Refine the questionnaire (means of verifications?) 31

32 **** Thank you Dr Giancarlo Ferrari Dr Nadège Leboucq GF TADs PPR Working Group members

33 [monitoring tool] To monitor progress within a given Stage and provide an indicative list of activities to implement in the year to come (annual PPR Roadmap) How? 33