BREEAM Refurbishment Statistics

Transcription

1 BREEAM Statistics This collection of statistical data provides a snap-shot of ishment and fit-out projects certificated to BREEAM from projects assessed against BREEAM 2008 and BREEAM 2011 New Construction schemes. It provides clients, architects, contractors, building owners, design teams and assessors with knowledge about how ishment and fit-out projects are performing against BREEAM across the market place, helping you to identify how you compare in terms of the overall score as well as individual category scores. Top ten scoring non domestic ishment and fit-out projects The following table highlights the top 10 scoring ishment and fit-out projects assessed under the BREEAM UK 2011, BREEAM UK 2008 New Construction schemes and the BREEAM International Commercial scheme (note: this excludes projects that are mixed new build/ishment.). Development Region Scheme Type Stage Rating Score (%) 1 Embankment Place, Price Waterhouse Coopers LLP Final Outstanding Quadrant 2 (10 Air Street), The Crown Estate Offices 2011 Major (shell only) Interim Outstanding Harrogate International Centre Yorkshire & the Humber BREEAM UK New Construction : Bespoke 2008 Interim Outstanding Waitrose, Bracknell South East BREEAM UK New Construction : Retail 2008 Powerhouse Kjørbo Norway BREEAM UK New Construction : Offices 2012 Carre Vert Ilôt Kleber France BREEAM International Commercial: Offices 2009 Fit out Final Outstanding Interim Outstanding 87.2 Final Outstanding Stable Street, Argent (Property Development) Services LLP Bombay Sapphire Distillery Process Buildings 1 Southampton Street, Aviva Investors Marcol House, Great Portland Estates South East BREEAM UK New Construction : Industrial 2008 Fit out Final Outstanding Interim Outstanding Final Excellent Final Excellent P:1

2 BREEAM Statistics Projects certified under BREEAM UK by scheme The following data is from an extract of data from 1000 buildings certificated against the BREEAM 2008 schemes, representing 10% of total buildings certificated against BREEAM. Fit-Out Offices and Retail fit-out are the most common building types certificated representing 87% of buildings. This is followed by Bespoke (4.7%), Healthcare (2.3%) and Multi-residential (2.3%) with Education, Industrial and Data Centres representing 3.6% of fit-out projects. Scheme Bespoke 4.7% Data Centres 1.2% Education 1.2% Healthcare 2.3% Higher Education 0.0% Industrial 1.2% Multi-residential 2.3% Offices 36.0% Retail 51.0% Bespoke Data Centres Education Healthcare Higher Education Industrial Multi-residential Offices Retail projects assessed against BREEAM generally include a wide range of buildings types with Offices and Bespoke projects being the predominant building type (72%) as well as Higher Education, Industrial, Multi-Residential, Retail and Healthcare making up a significant proportion of building types. Scheme Bespoke 23.7% Data Centres 0.0% Education 0.7% Healthcare 3.0% Higher Education 6.7% Industrial 5.2% Multi-residential 5.2% Offices 48.9% Retail 6.7% Bespoke Data Centres Education Healthcare Higher Education Industrial Multi-residential Offices Retail P:2

3 Average BREEAM UK Rating: and More than 75% of ishment projects achieved at least a BREEAM Very Good rating. The majority of (65%) ishment projects achieved a Very Good rating, with 10% achieving an Excellent and almost 1% achieving an Outstanding. 9.6% of buildings achieved a Pass and 8.9% achieving a Good rating. Pass 9.6% Good 8.9% Very Good 65.3% Excellent 10.4% Outstanding 0.2% More than 97% of fit out projects have achieved at least a BREEAM Very Good rating with 67% achieving a Very Good rating and more than 30% achieving an Excellent Rating, outperforming the typical rating achieved by ishment projects with a higher number of projects achieving an Excellent Rating and few achieving a Pass or Good. Pass 9.6% Good 2.3% Very Good 67% Excellent 30.2% Outstanding 0.7% P:3

4 Average BREEAM UK category score: projects perform the best against the Land Use and Ecology, Management, Waste, Materials and Transport Categories, achieving at least 60% of the available score in each category. Some of this performance is likely to be attributed to the positive impacts that ishment typically has on retention of existing materials and minimising site impacts on ecology, due to the use of an existing developed site. projects typically perform the worst against the Pollution, Energy and Health and Wellbeing categories. There are a range of reasons why ishment projects may not perform as well against these categories such as limitations with improving building fabric and existing site constraints. However, as indicated by the maximum score achieved this is not always the case with up to 91% being achieved for the energy section, 100% for the pollution category and 76% for the health and wellbeing category. Average and maximum % category scores achieved: Land Use & Ecology Pollution Waste Materials Water Transport Energy Health & wellbeing Management 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% % score Maximum score Average P:4

5 Average BREEAM UK category score: projects have the highest performance in the Waste, Materials and Management categories with more than 75% of the available category score being achieved on average. projects tend to score less well against the Pollution, Water, Transport, Energy and Health and Wellbeing categories with less than 60% of category score being achieved. The energy category is the category with the lowest average performance with just over 40% of category score being achieved on average. However, as indicated by the maximum scores achieved up to 90% has been achieved in the energy category. Average and maximum % category score achieved: Pollution Waste Materials Water Transport Energy Health & wellbeing Management 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% % score Maximum score Average Further information For further information on BREEAM including case studies on certificated ishment and fit-out projects see P:5